DOCSLIB.ORG

Contrat Cadre Fish/2006/20 Specific Convention N°15

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Contrat Cadre Fish/2006/20 Specific Convention N°15 MEGAPESCA Lda CONTRAT CADRE FISH/2006/20 SPECIFIC CONVENTION N°15 ANALYSIS OF EXPECTED CONSEQUENCES FOR DEVELOPING COUNTRIES OF THE IUU FISHING PROPOSED REGULATION AND IDENTIFICATION OF MEASURES NEEDED TO IMPLEMENT THE REGULATION – PHASE 2 Final Report 4 May 2009 Final Report This report has been prepared with the financial support of the European Commission. The views expressed in this study are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the European Commission or of its services. This report does not seek to establish the Commission’s future policy in this area. The content of this report may not be reproduced, or even part thereof, without explicit reference to the source. Oceanic Développement, MegaPesca Lda (2007). “Contract for performing evaluations, impact analyses and monitoring services in the context of fisheries partnership agreements concluded between the Community and non-member coastal states and more generally of the external strand of the common fisheries policy (FISH 2006-20)” DOCUMENT INTERNE : DROITS DE DIFFUSION RESERVES A LA C.E. Contact des auteurs : OCEANIC DÉVELOPPEMENT Z.I. du Moros, 29900 Concarneau, France Tel : +33 2 98 50 89 99 Fax : +33 2 98 50 78 98 Email : [email protected] URL : http://www.oceanic-dev.com Version : Final Report Réf. rapport: FPA 15 / IUU/ 08 Date de publication: 4 May 2009 Final Report Report FPA 15/IUU/08 ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS USED ACP African, Caribbean and Pacific Group of States AEO Approved Economic Operator APRIS ASEAN-EU Programme for Regional Integration Support ASEAN The Association of Southeast Asian Nations BRIK Timber Industry Revitalisation Body CA Competent Authority CCAMLR Commission for the Conservation of Antarctic Marine Living Resources CCIP Customs Code's Implementing Provisions CCSBT Conservation of Southern Bluefin Tuna CDS Catch Documentation Scheme CITES Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora. CoO Certificate of Origin CoP Conference of the Parties DG FPPM Directorate General of fishery product processing and marketing DMM Direction de la Marine Marchande DoF Department of Fisheries DPCIA Dolphin Protection Consumer Information Act DPM Direction de la Pêche Maritime DPMA Direction des Pêches Maritimes et de l’Aquaculture EACCE Etablissement Autonome de Controle et de Coordination Des Exportations EC European Community EEZ Exclusive Economic Zone EU European Union FVO Food and Veterinary Office GoE Government of Ecuador GoI Government of Indonesia GoT Government of Thailand GT Gross tons HACCP Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Point IATCC Inter-American Tropical Tuna Commission ICCAT International Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas Final Report Report FPA 15/IUU/08 IDCPA International Dolphin Conservation Program Act IMMP International Marine Mammal Project INP Instituto Nacional de Pesca IOTC Indian Ocean Tuna Commission IUCN The world conservation union IUU Illegal, unreported unregulated JICA Japan International Cooperation Agency MCS Monitoring control and Surveillance MFMR Ministry of Fisheries and Marine Resources MFRDB Marine Fisheries Research and Development Bureau MMAF Ministry of Marine Affairs and Fisheries, MMPA Marine Mammal Protection Act MoU Memorandum of understanding MSC Marine Stewardship Council RFMOs Regional Fisheries Management Organizations SADC Southern African Development Community SEAFDEC Southeast Asian Fisheries Development Centre SEAFO South-East Atlantic Fisheries Organisation SoE State owned enterprise SRP Subsecretaría de Recursos Pesqueros SSF Small Scale Fisheries TAC Total Allowable Catch ToRs Terms of Reference VMS Vessel Monitoring System WCO World Customs Organisation Final Report Report FPA 15/IUU/08 CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY.......................................................................................................................... I RESUME.................................................................................................................................................. XI 1 INTRODUCTION ...............................................................................................................................1 2 BACKGROUND.................................................................................................................................2 2.1 COMMUNITY POLICY AND LEGISLATION IN RELATION TO IUU FISHING ........................................2 2.2 FEATURES OF REGULATION 1005/2008 .....................................................................................2 2.2.1 Definitions ...........................................................................................................................3 2.2.2 Catch certification requirement ........................................................................................3 2.2.3 Administrative cooperation ...............................................................................................4 2.2.4 Verification checks on importation of consignments.....................................................5 2.2.5 Community Alert System ..................................................................................................5 2.2.6 Support for third countries ................................................................................................6 3 STUDY METHODOLOGY................................................................................................................6 3.1 PREVIOUS STUDY .........................................................................................................................6 3.2 GENERAL APPROACH ...................................................................................................................7 3.3 REVIEW OF EXISTING CERTIFICATION SYSTEMS...........................................................................7 3.4 CASE STUDIES ON CATCH CERTIFICATION IN THIRD COUNTRIES .................................................7 3.5 EVALUATION OF IMPLEMENTATION CAPACITY FOR CATCH CERTIFICATION .................................8 3.6 COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS..............................................................................................................9 4 EXISTING CERTIFICATIONS SYSTEMS FOR TRADE IN FISHERY PRODUCTS............10 4.1 INTRODUCTION ...........................................................................................................................10 4.2 CERTIFICATION OF SANITARY CONDITIONS ...............................................................................10 4.2.1 Legal basis for requirements..........................................................................................10 4.2.2 Response of third countries............................................................................................11 4.3 CITES CERTIFICATION ..............................................................................................................11 4.3.1 Legal basis for requirements..........................................................................................11 4.3.2 Response of third countries............................................................................................12 4.4 CERTIFICATION OF ORIGIN.........................................................................................................13 4.4.1 Legal basis for requirements..........................................................................................13 4.4.2 Response of third countries............................................................................................14 4.5 CATCH CERTIFICATION IN FULFILMENT OF RFMO OBLIGATIONS..............................................14 4.5.1 Legal basis for requirements..........................................................................................14 4.5.2 Response of third countries............................................................................................16 5 MAIN FINDINGS: THIRD COUNTRY CASE STUDIES............................................................16 5.1 NAMIBIA ......................................................................................................................................16 5.1.1 Fishery sector profile .......................................................................................................16 5.1.2 Fisheries management and controls.............................................................................18 5.1.3 Export controls for fishery products...............................................................................20 5.1.4 Status of traceability systems.........................................................................................24 5.1.5 Type and volume of certification required for implementation of the Regulation ...24 5.1.6 Technical and administrative capacity for catch certification ....................................26 5.1.7 Official checks on origin ..................................................................................................27 5.1.8 Namibia Needs assessment...........................................................................................27 5.1.9 Expected impacts of catch certification on illegal fishing ...........................................28 5.2 INDONESIA ..................................................................................................................................28 5.2.1 Fishery sector profile .......................................................................................................28 5.2.2
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Proceedings of the Fourth Forum of the Regional Network of Local Governments Implementing Integrated Coastal Management
    PEMSEA/WP/2005/18 GEF/UNDP/IMO Regional Programme on Partnerships in Environmental Management for the Seas of East Asia Proceedings of the Fourth Forum of the Regional Network of Local Governments Implementing Integrated Coastal Management Building Better Coastal Governance through Stronger Local Alliance Bali, Indonesia 26-28 April 2005 PEMSEA/WP/2005/18 PROCEEDINGS OF THE FOURTH FORUM OF THE REGIONAL NETWORK OF LOCAL GOVERNMENTS IMPLEMENTING INTEGRATED COASTAL MANAGEMENT Building Better Coastal Governance through Stronger Local Alliance GEF/UNDP/IMO Regional Programme on Building Partnerships in Environmental Management for the Seas of East Asia (PEMSEA) RAS/98/G33/A/IG/19 Bali, Indonesia 26-28 April 2005 PROCEEDINGS OF THE FOURTH FORUM OF THE REGIONAL NETWORK OF LOCAL GOVERNMENTS IMPLEMENTING INTEGRATED COASTAL MANAGEMENT Building Better Coastal Governance through Stronger Local Alliance September 2005 This publication may be reproduced in whole or in part and in any form for educational or non-profit purposes or to provide wider dissemination for public response, provided prior written permission is obtained from the Regional Programme Director, acknowledgment of the source is made and no commercial usage or sale of the material occurs. PEMSEA would appreciate receiving a copy of any publication that uses this publication as a source. No use of this publication may be made for resale, any commercial purpose or any purpose other than those given above without a written agreement between PEMSEA and the requesting party. Published by the GEF/UNDP/IMO Regional Programme on Building Partnerships in Environmental Management for the Seas of East Asia Printed in Quezon City, Philippines PEMSEA.
    [Show full text]
  • Coelacanth Discoveries in Madagascar, with AUTHORS: Andrew Cooke1 Recommendations on Research and Conservation Michael N
    Coelacanth discoveries in Madagascar, with AUTHORS: Andrew Cooke1 recommendations on research and conservation Michael N. Bruton2 Minosoa Ravololoharinjara3 The presence of populations of the Western Indian Ocean coelacanth (Latimeria chalumnae) in AFFILIATIONS: 1Resolve sarl, Ivandry Business Madagascar is not surprising considering the vast range of habitats which the ancient island offers. Center, Antananarivo, Madagascar The discovery of a substantial population of coelacanths through handline fishing on the steep volcanic 2Honorary Research Associate, South African Institute for Aquatic slopes of Comoros archipelago initially provided an important source of museum specimens and was Biodiversity, Makhanda, South Africa the main focus of coelacanth research for almost 40 years. The advent of deep-set gillnets, or jarifa, for 3Resolve sarl, Ivandry Business catching sharks, driven by the demand for shark fins and oil from China in the mid- to late 1980s, resulted Center, Antananarivo, Madagascar in an explosion of coelacanth captures in Madagascar and other countries in the Western Indian Ocean. CORRESPONDENCE TO: We review coelacanth catches in Madagascar and present evidence for the existence of one or more Andrew Cooke populations of L. chalumnae distributed along about 1000 km of the southern and western coasts of the island. We also hypothesise that coelacanths are likely to occur around the whole continental margin EMAIL: [email protected] of Madagascar, making it the epicentre of coelacanth distribution in the Western Indian Ocean and the likely progenitor of the younger Comoros coelacanth population. Finally, we discuss the importance and DATES: vulnerability of the population of coelacanths inhabiting the submarine slopes of the Onilahy canyon in Received: 23 June 2020 Revised: 02 Oct.
    [Show full text]
  • Identification of Important Marine Areas Using Ecologically Or Biologically Significant Areas
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by JAMSTEC Repository Identification of important marine areas using ecologically or biologically significant areas (EBSAs) criteria in the East to Southeast Asia region and comparison with existing registered areas for the purpose of conservation Takehisa Yamakitaa,*,‡, Kenji Sudob,* , Yoshie Jintsu-Uchifunea,, Hiroyuki Yamamotoa, Yoshihisa Shirayamaa aJapan Agency for Marine-Earth Science and Technology (JAMSTEC), 2-15 Natsushima-cho, Yokosuka, Kanagawa 237-0061, Japan bAkkeshi Marine Station, Field Science Center for Northern Biosphere, Hokkaido University, Aikappu 1, Akkeshi, Hokkaido 088-1113, Japan *These authors contributed equally to this manuscript; order was decided by the correspondence timeline ‡Corresponding author: Takehisa Yamakita Tel.: +81 46 867 9767 E-mail address:[email protected] 22 23 Abstract 24 The biodiversity of East to Southeast (E–SE) Asian waters is rapidly declining because 25 of anthropogenic effects ranging from local environmental pressures to global warming. 26 To improve marine biodiversity, the Aichi Biodiversity Targets were adopted in 2010. 27 The recommendation of the Subsidiary Body on Scientific, Technical and 28 Technological Advice (SBSTTA), encourages application of the ecologically or 29 biologically significant area (EBSA) process to identify areas for conservation. 30 However, there are few examples of the use of EBSA criteria to evaluate entire oceans. 31 In this article, seven criteria are numerically
    [Show full text]
  • 2 Existing Certification Systems for Fishery Products
    Fisheries Partnership Agreement FPA 2006/20 FPA 15/IUU/08 ANNEX 2: INFORMATION NOTE ON IMPACT ASSESSMENT MISSION Council Regulation establishing a Community system to prevent, deter and eliminate illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing Oceanic Développement/Megapesca Lda 1. Introduction DG MARE of the European Commission has recruited consultants Oceanic Développement/Megapesca to undertake a study of the impacts of the new IUU fishing regulation in developing countries. A number of countries which represent different stages of development and fisheries conditions have been selected as candidates for detailed study. As part of this study the consultants will undertake field mission to each of the following countries: Ecuador, Indonesia, Mauritania, Mauritius, Morocco, Namibia, Senegal and Thailand. The duration of each field mission will be approximately one week. 2. Objectives of the Field Mission The field mission aims to meet with key governmental, industry and NGO stakeholders in the third country with a view to gathering data to: • Describe what are the national arrangements in place i) to regulate and monitor the fishing fleet flying its own flag, and ii) to ensure traceability of nationally landed and imported fisheries products • Define possible support measures which the Community could undertake, to increase the potential for successful implementation of the regulation in the third country, and to ameliorate any potential negative impacts. • Support the analysis and quantification of the positive and negative impacts of the newly adopted IUU fishing regulation, with particular reference to the certification scheme defined in Chapter III of the Regulation and its further provisions to provide cooperation and exchange of information with third countries in Chapters II, IV, VI and XI 3.
    [Show full text]
  • This Is a Peer Reviewed Version Of
    This is a peer reviewed version of the following article: Tulloch, A., Auerbach, N., Avery- Gomm, S., Bayraktarov, E., Butt, N., Dickman, C.R., Ehmke, G., Fisher, D.O., Grantham, H., Holden, M.H., Lavery, T.H., Leseberg, N.P., Nicholls, M., O’Connor, J., Roberson, L., Smyth, A.K., Stone, Z., Tulloch, V., Turak, E., Wardle, G.M., Watson, J.E.M. (2018) A decision tree for assessing the risks and benefits of publishing biodiversity data, Nature Ecology & Evolution, Vol. 2, pp. 1209-1217; which has been published in final form at: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-018-0608-1 1 2 A decision tree for assessing the risks and benefits of publishing 3 biodiversity data 4 Ayesha I.T. Tulloch1,2,3*, Nancy Auerbach4, Stephanie Avery-Gomm4, Elisa Bayraktarov4, Nathalie Butt4, Chris R. 5 Dickman3, Glenn Ehmke5, Diana O. Fisher4, Hedley Grantham2, Matthew H. Holden4, Tyrone H. Lavery6, 6 Nicholas P. Leseberg1, Miles Nicholls7, James O’Connor5, Leslie Roberson4, Anita K. Smyth8, Zoe Stone1, 7 Vivitskaia Tulloch4, Eren Turak9,10, Glenda M. Wardle3, James E.M. Watson1,2 8 1. School of Earth and Environmental Sciences, The University of Queensland, St. Lucia Queensland 4072, 9 Australia 10 2. Wildlife Conservation Society, Global Conservation Program, 2300 Southern Boulevard, Bronx NY 11 10460-1068, USA 12 3. Desert Ecology Research Group, School of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Sydney, 13 Sydney NSW 2006, Australia 14 4. School of Biological Sciences, The University of Queensland, St. Lucia, Brisbane Queensland 4072, 15 Australia 16 5. BirdLife Australia, Melbourne VIC 3053, Australia 17 6.
    [Show full text]
  • Field Surveys on the Indonesian Coelacanth, Latimeria Menadoensis Using Remotely Been Described
    Bull. Kitakyushu Mus. Nat. Hist. Hum. Hist., Ser. A, 17: 49–56, March 31, 2019 Field surveys on the Indonesian coelacanth, Latimeria menadoensis using remotely been described. The aim of this study is to clear their habitat Allometric growth in the extant coelacanth lung during capture of a coelacanth off Madagascar. South African operated vehicles from 2005 to 2015 and distribution. ontogenetic development. Nature Communications, 6: Journal of Science 92: 150–151. 8222. DOI: 10.1038/ncomms9222 POUYAUD, L., WIRJOATMODJO, S., RACHMATIKA, I., TJAKRAWIDJAJA, DE VOS, L. and OYUGI, D. 2002. First capture of a coelacanth, A., HADIATY, R. and HADIE, W. 1999. A new species of Masamitsu IWATA 1, Yoshitaka YABUMOTO2, Toshiro SARUWATARI3,4, Shinya YAMAUCHI1, Kenichi FUJII1, METHODS Latimeria chalumnae SMITH, 1939 (Pisces, Latimeriidae), coelacanth. Genetic and morphologic proof. C. R. 1 1 5 5 6 7 off Kenya. South African Journal of Science, 98: 345–347. Academy of Science, 322: 261–267. Rintaro ISHII , Toshiaki MORI , Frensly D. HUKOM , DIRHAMSYAH , Teguh PERISTIWADY , Augy SYAHAILATUA , Two remotely operated vehicles (ROVs) (Kowa; ERDMANN, M. V., CALDWELL, R. L. and MOOSA, M. K. 1998. SMITH, J. L. B. 1939. The living coelacanth fish from South 8 8 8 1 Kawilarang W. A. MASENGI , Ixchel F. MANDAGI , Fransisco PANGALILA and Yoshitaka ABE VEGA300) were used for the surveys. The first ROV was Indonesian ‘king of the sea’ discovered. Nature, 395: 335. Africa. Nature, 143: 748–750. replaced with the second one in 2007. Our ROVs are able to overhang off Talise Island between 144 and 150 m deep. There again in October 2015 on a steep slope (Table 2: E25, E27).
    [Show full text]
  • 2 Desember 2006
    ISSN 0216-9169 Fauna Indonesia Hystrix brachyura Zo o l o g t i I a n k d a r o a n Pusat Penelitian Biologi - LIPI y e s s a i a Bogor M MZI Fauna Indonesia Fauna Indonesia merupakan Majalah llmiah Populer yang diterbitkan oleh Masyarakat Zoologi Indonesia (MZI). Majalah ini memuat hasil pengamatan ataupun kajian yang berkaitan dengan fauna asli Indonesia, diterbitkan secara berkala dua kali setahun ISSN 0216-9169 Redaksi Mohammad Irham Kartika Dewi Pungki Lupiyaningdyah Nur Rohmatin Isnaningsih Sekretariatan Yuni Apriyanti Yulianto Mitra Bestari Renny Kurnia Hadiaty Ristiyanti M. Marwoto Tata Letak Kartika Dewi R. Taufiq Purna Nugraha Alamat Redaksi Bidang Zoologi Puslit Biologi - LIPI Gd. Widyasatwaloka, Cibinong Science Center JI. Raya Jakarta-Bogor Km. 46 Cibinong 16911 TeIp. (021) 8765056-64 Fax. (021) 8765068 E-mail: [email protected] Foto sampul depan : Hystrix brachyura - Foto : Wartika Rosa Farida PEDOMAN PENULISAN 1. Redaksi FAUNA INDONESIA menerima sumbangan naskah yang belum pernah diterbitkan, dapat berupa hasil pengamatan di lapangan/ laboratorium atau studi pustaka yang terkait dengan fauna asli Indonesia yang bersifat ilmiah popular. 2. Naskah ditulis dalam Bahasa Indonesia dengan summary Bahasa Inggris maksimum 200 kata dengan jarak baris tunggal. 3. Huruf menggunakan tipe Times New Roman 12, jarak baris 1,5 dalam format kertas A4 dengan ukuran margin atas dan bawah 2.5 cm, kanan dan kiri 3 cm. 4. Sistematika penulisan: a. Judul: ditulis huruf besar, kecuali nama ilmiah spesies, dengan ukuran huruf 14. b. Nama pengarang dan instansi/ organisasi. c. Summary d. Pendahuluan e. Isi: i. Jika tulisan berdasarkan pengamatan lapangan/ laboratorium maka dapat dicantumkan cara kerja/ metoda, lokasi dan waktu, hasil, pembahasan.
    [Show full text]
  • Tkpipa/Frp/Sm/X/2014 1
    LIST OF RESEARCH APPLICATION Date 30 October 2014 THE MINISTRY OF RESEARCH AND TECHNOLOGY No. : /TKPIPA/FRP/SM/X/2014 TIM KOORDINASI PEMBERIAN IZIN PENELITIAN A. POSTPONED APPLICATION NO. a. NAME a. RESEARCH PERIOD b. CITIZENSHIP b. LOCATION c. INSTITUTION c. INDONESIAN COUNTERPART STATUS REMARKS d. FUNDING GUARANTOR d. FIELD OF RESEARCH e. POSITION e. RESEARCH TITLE 1 a. Mr. Wanggi Jaung a. 4 months (October 2014 until January 2015) 16/10/2014: Researchers is requested to add b. Korea b. Nusa Tenggara Barat (Lombok) counterpart, Dr Markum from Forestry c. University of British Columbia c. Konsorsium untuk Study dan Pengembangan Department of University of MataramPeneliti Partisipasi (Konsepsi) (Witardi, SE) POSTPONED diminta untuk menambahkan mitra yaitu Dr. d. University of British Columbia d. Ecology e. PhD candidate e. Market Studies for Certification of Forest Ecosystem Services in Lombok B. EXTENSION APPLICATION NO. a. NAME a. RESEARCH PERIOD b. CITIZENSHIP b. LOCATION c. INSTITUTION c. INDONESIAN COUNTERPART STATUS REMARKS d. FUNDING GUARANTOR d. FIELD OF RESEARCH e. POSITION e. RESEARCH TITLE 1 a. Mr. Lukas Ley a. 12 months (March 2014 until. March 2015) SIP No. 100/SIP/FRP/SM/IV/2014 berlaku s.d 9 b. Germany b. DKI Jakarta (Pademangan, Penjaringan), Jabar April 2015 c. University of Toronto c. Fakultas Ilmu Budaya UGM (Dr. Pujo Semedi Hargo 30/10/2014: Researcher's request to add new Yuwono, M.A.) REJECTED research location is rejected. Researcher is d. University of Toronto d. Socio-ecology requested to focus his research at current e. PhD Student e. Living on borrowed time: The Anticipatory Politics of location as stated on initial proposal Vulnerability and Climate Change in Jakarta, Indonesia" 2 a.
    [Show full text]
  • What the Coelacanth Claim? a Significance of In-Situ Conservation
    What the Coelacanth Claim? A Significance of In-Situ Conservation Masamitsu Iwata1, Augy Syahailatua2, Frensly D. Hukom3, Teguh Peristiwady4, Dirhamsyah3, Kawilarang W.A. Masengi5, Yoshitaka Abe1 1Aquamarine Fukushima, Marine Science Museum 2Research Center for Deep Sea, Indonesian Institute of Sciences 3Research Center for Oceanography, Indonesian Institute of Sciences 4Technical Implementation Unit Marine Biota Conservation Bitung, Indonesian Institute of Sciences 5Faculty of Fisheries and Marine Science, Sam Ratulangi University ABSTRACT: There are two species of coelacanth in the world. African coelacanth, Latimeria chalumnae, distributed in the huge area of the east coast of the African continent and islands in front of the continent in the Indian Ocean. On the other hand, Indonesian coelacanth, L. menadoensis, has been found in few regions in Indonesian waters. Aquamarine Fukushima, Marine Science Museum has conducted field surveys in Indonesia since 2005 and found a new habitat in Sulawesi Island and a small island located in the north-west of the New Guinea Island. These activities are collaborated with the Indonesian Institute of Sciences as a national scientific academy and the Sam Ratulangi University as a local academy. Just eight specimens of the Indonesian coelacanth were caught while more than 300 African coelacanth specimens exist. The ecology of the Indonesian coelacanth is still unknown. The local government and economic markets utilize the Indonesian coelacanth as an icon of conservation or sightseeing industry, but it has not succeeded yet because it is difficult to find them which inhabit deep water of more than 150m. Therefore, their conservation is not active yet. Indonesian Institute of Sciences plans to construct a conservation center for the Indonesian coelacanth, and the Aquamarine Fukushima involves in this project by constructing a small supporting facility.
    [Show full text]
  • A Detailed Morphological Measurement of the Seventh Specimen of the Indonesian Coelacanth, First Step for a Re-Description of This Species
    Bull. Kitakyushu Mus. Nat. Hist. Hum. Hist., Ser. A, 17: 67–80, March 31, 2019 A detailed morphological measurement of the seventh specimen of the Indonesian coelacanth, first step for a re-description of this species. from snout to posterior tip of fleshy flap of operculum (3 in POUYAUD, L., WIRJOATMODJO, S., RACHMATIKA, I., L. B. SMITH). The Cape Naturalist, 1: 321–327. [Reprinted Fig. 2A). TJAKRAWIDJAJA, A., HADIATY, R. and HADIE, W. 1999. in Ichthyological papers of J. L. B. SMITH 1931–1943. Latimeria menadoensis, with a compilation of current morphological data of the species Fin area was measured using the following procedures. Une nouvelle espèce de cœlacanthe. Preuves génétiques Vol.2. 409–415.] MATERIALS AND METHODS Outline of each fin was transferred onto A4 sized clear OHP et morphologiques. A new species of coelacanth. Science SMITH, J. L. B. 1940. A living coelacanthid fish from South Toshiro SARUWATARI1,2, Masamitsu IWATA 3, Yoshitaka YABUMOTO4, Frensley D. HUKOM5, sheet. Then fin outline was copied onto 157 g/m2 card stock de la vie Life Sciences, 322: 257–352. Africa. Transactions of the Royal Society of South Africa, 6 3 The seventh specimen of L. menadoensis, CCC No. 299 using carbon paper. Each fin was then cut out, weighed and the SMITH, J. L. B. 1939a. A living fish of Mesozoic type. Nature, 27: 1–106, pls. I–XLIV. [Reprinted in Ichthyological Teguh PERISTIWADY and Yoshitaka ABE (Figs. 1, 2) weight was converted to area in cm2. 143: 455–456. papers of J. L. B. SMITH 1931–1943. Vol.2.
    [Show full text]
  • Pesisir & Lautan Vol. 2, No. 1. 1999
    ISSN 1410-7821, Volume 2, No. 1, 1999 Pemimpin Redaksi (Editor - in- Chief) Dietriech G. Bengen Dewan Redaksi (Editorial Board) Rokhmin Dahuri Ian M. Dutton Richardus F. Kaswadji Jacub Rais Chou Loke Ming Darmawan Neviaty P. Zamani Konsultan Redaksi (Consulting Editors) Herman Haeruman Js. Anugerah Nontji Aprilani Soegiarto Irwandi Idris Sapta Putra Ginting Tridoyo Kusumastanto Chairul Muluk Effendy A. Sumardja Iwan Gunawan Daniel Mohammad Rosyid Gayatrie R. Liley Janny D. Kusen J. Wenno, N.N. Natsir Nessa Sekretaris Redaksi ( Editorial Secretary) Siti Nurwati Hodijah Alamat Redaksi (Editorial Address) Pusat Kajian Sumberdaya Pesisir dan Lautan (Center for Coastal and Marine Resources Studies) Gedung Marine Center Lt. 4, Fakultas Perikanan IPB Kampus IPB Darmaga Bogor 16680 INDONESIA Tel/Fax. 62-251-621086, Tel. 62-251-626380 e-mail: [email protected] Halaman muka: Teluk Manado (foto: Bengen, D.G., 1998) Pada edisi ketiga jurnal “Pesisir & Lautan” ini, kami hadir dengan format dan tampilan yang lebih komunikatif dan menarik. Mengingat bahwa kebutuhan untuk berbagi pengalaman dan pengetahuan terus meningkat, maka berdasarkan saran-saran dan masukan-masukan yang kami peroleh dari para penelaah dan pembaca, jurnal “Pesisir & Lautan” akan hadir ke hadapan Anda tiga kali dalam setahun dimulai sejak penerbitan edisi ketiga ini. Semoga jurnal ini dapat menjadi suatu media informasi bagi para pemerhati maupun praktisi pengelolaan sumberdaya pesisir dan lautan. Selamat membaca dan kontribusi Anda kami nantikan. For the third edition of “Pesisir & Lautan” journal, we have redesigned the format and appearance, in order to make it more attractive and communicative. The need for sharing experience and knowledge is increasing from day to day; hence, in response to many suggestion and inputs from reviewers, readers and subscribers (both domestic and abroad), we have decided that the journal will be published three times a year commencing this edition.
    [Show full text]
  • Message from the Ministry of Marine Affairs and Fisheries for the International Ocean Science, Technology and Policy Symposium 2009"
    MESSAGE FROM THE MINISTRY OF MARINE AFFAIRS AND FISHERIES FOR THE INTERNATIONAL OCEAN SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY AND POLICY SYMPOSIUM 2009" The Government of Indonesia will host the World Ocean Conference 2009 (WOC’09) in Manado, the capital city of North Sulawesi Province, during May 11 - 15, 2009. In conjunction with that global event, the Ministry of Marine Affairs and Fisheries (MMAF) and The Provincial Government of North Sulawesi will co-organize an International Ocean Science, Technology, and Policy Symposium as a side event of the WOC’09. The symposium will be held during May 12 - 14, 2009 at the same site of the WOC’09 venue. The symposium will cover various aspects related to oceans including physical, biological, technological, and social economic. Altogether, there will be 31 different topics to be discussed at parallel sessions during three days activity. It is organized in such a way that participants and speakers may involve in more than one sessions, and freely mobile, in order to gain maximum benefits of their presence. The objective of the symposium is to share information among scientists, managers, practitioners, entrepreneurs, and policy-makers on their recent and current experiences. It is a global arena for participants to introduce their new inventions, great ideas, research findings, derived methods and technologies of production, as well as resource policy advices, in order that everybody may improve his/her capacity in their respective field and specialization. Being a side event of the WOC’09, the symposium may also provide information directly and indirectly to the leaders and prominent figures from around the world who attend the WOC’09, to seek for a common understanding on the benefits and impacts of ocean to world society.
    [Show full text]