DOCSLIB.ORG

2 Existing Certification Systems for Fishery Products

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
2 Existing Certification Systems for Fishery Products Fisheries Partnership Agreement FPA 2006/20 FPA 15/IUU/08 ANNEX 2: INFORMATION NOTE ON IMPACT ASSESSMENT MISSION Council Regulation establishing a Community system to prevent, deter and eliminate illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing Oceanic Développement/Megapesca Lda 1. Introduction DG MARE of the European Commission has recruited consultants Oceanic Développement/Megapesca to undertake a study of the impacts of the new IUU fishing regulation in developing countries. A number of countries which represent different stages of development and fisheries conditions have been selected as candidates for detailed study. As part of this study the consultants will undertake field mission to each of the following countries: Ecuador, Indonesia, Mauritania, Mauritius, Morocco, Namibia, Senegal and Thailand. The duration of each field mission will be approximately one week. 2. Objectives of the Field Mission The field mission aims to meet with key governmental, industry and NGO stakeholders in the third country with a view to gathering data to: • Describe what are the national arrangements in place i) to regulate and monitor the fishing fleet flying its own flag, and ii) to ensure traceability of nationally landed and imported fisheries products • Define possible support measures which the Community could undertake, to increase the potential for successful implementation of the regulation in the third country, and to ameliorate any potential negative impacts. • Support the analysis and quantification of the positive and negative impacts of the newly adopted IUU fishing regulation, with particular reference to the certification scheme defined in Chapter III of the Regulation and its further provisions to provide cooperation and exchange of information with third countries in Chapters II, IV, VI and XI 3. Outputs of the Mission Outputs from the field missions will be used to support an overall analysis of the impacts of the IUU certification scheme on developing countries. This report will be finalised after the field mission and shall be submitted to DG MARE by 31 January 2009. 4. Proposed structure of the field mission 4.1 Kick-off Meeting The Consultants propose that the mission commences with a round-table hosted by the EC Delegation and attended by the consultants and all relevant stakeholders. This meeting would serve the purpose of discussing the relevant issues according to the agenda proposed below, and to plan further specific meetings to take place during the duration of the mission. 1. Introduction by the EC Delegation 2. Introduction by the consultant of mission objectives Draft Final Report Annex 2 - page 1 Fisheries Partnership Agreement FPA 2006/20 FPA 15/IUU/08 3. Introduction by Competent Authority for fisheries management, on existing control system in place for fishing by national vessels in national, international and other third country waters (including transhipments) 4. Identification and discussion on existing mechanisms used at national level for certification of trade in fishery products (e.g. certification for sanitary conditions, origin, CITES, under RFMOs programmes, etc) 5. Identification of areas of potential difficulty for implementation by the third country 6. Discussion on known extent and nature of IUU fishing and its environmental and economic impacts on the third country, when undertaken by: a) vessels flagged by the third country (the mission country) in all waters b) vessels flagged by other third countries in the national waters of the mission country 7. Preliminary identification of views regarding costs and benefits of the EC’s new IUU Regulation to the third country. 8. Discussion of arrangements for follow-on meetings and clarification of technical data requirements 4.2 Stakeholders The kick-off meeting, and the detailed discussions should seek to consult representatives from the following stakeholders: • Competent Authority for fisheries management • Competent Authority for fisheries monitoring control and surveillance (eg. Navy or Coastguard) • Competent Authority for the operation of the fishing fleet register • Customs Authorities • Competent Authority for the certification of origin for fishery products • Competent Authority for certification of sanitary conditions for fishery products • Competent Authorities responsible for certification of fishery products for conservation or environmental purposes(e.g. CITES1, RFMOs2) • Industry associations (ship owners, fishermen’s unions, processing industry, small scale fisheries) • Representatives/agents of fishing vessels from other third countries which are authorised to fish in the waters of the mission country • Fisheries research (with emphasis on fisheries economics and IUU fishing) 4.3 Follow-on meetings with stakeholders A programme of subsequent meetings with individual stakeholders will be arranged at the kick- off meeting, to be undertaken by the consultant in the country. These meetings will be held at the premises of the stakeholders. The purpose of these meetings will be to: • Fulfil the technical data requirements for impact assessment (see below for detailed list of data to be collected by the consultants) • Explore in more detail the foreseeable potential impacts of the IUU fishing regulation, in terms of legal, economic, political, human resource, social and developmental impacts • Investigate the options available to the third country for the development of procedures to implement the catch certification scheme in Chapter III of the Regulation and the related provisions on cooperation (see section 2) 1 Convention on the International Trade in Endangered Species 2 Regional Fisheries Management Organisations Draft Final Report Annex 2 - page 2 Fisheries Partnership Agreement FPA 2006/20 FPA 15/IUU/08 • Explore the potential for support measures that could be launched by the European Community to enhance the positive and mitigate the negative impacts of the regulation in the third country. 4.4 De-briefing of EC Delegation Prior to his departure, the consultant will meet with the EC Delegation staff for a debriefing, at which he will summarise the meetings held, and the main findings obtained. Any outstanding matters to be addressed will also be identified (for example supplementary information to be supplied by the third country). 5. Preparatory actions requested from the EC Delegation In advance of the field mission, the EC Delegation is requested to undertake the following arrangements, to ensure the most effective use of time and a successful mission. 1. Communicate content of the new regulation to relevant authorities, along with explanatory information produced by DG MARE 2. Arrange for the principal point of contact for the consultant’s mission to be nominated from the third country’s principal Competent Authority for fisheries 3. Communicate the consultants’ data and field mission requirements to the principal Competent Authority for fisheries 4. Arrange a suitable week for the mission to take place, in consultation with the Commission, the relevant third country Competent Authorities and the consultants ([email protected]) 5. Arrange the venue and invitations for the kick-off meeting 6. Consultants’ Technical Data Requirements (from third country administration/industry operators) In general any relevant and recent reports/studies describing the fishery sector in the mission country, and in particular to which describes the export of fishery products and the extent to which the sector relies on export (notably into the EU). Specific data regarding the following (in order of priority): 6.1. Certification systems Organisation structures/staffing/budgets and standard operating procedures/periodic reports of the Competent Authorities responsible for: • fisheries management • sanitary controls and export certification of fishery products • certification of origin of exported fishery products • RFMOs and CITES certification (if applicable) 6.2. Traceability systems • extent of adoption of systems of traceability in fishing, fish processing and/or trading operations; • extent of any verification steps by Competent Authorities • costs of traceability systems Draft Final Report Annex 2 - page 3 Fisheries Partnership Agreement FPA 2006/20 FPA 15/IUU/08 6.3. Legislation Copies/translations of legislation concerning export of fishery products e.g.: • sanitary controls (including traceability requirements) • transhipment of fishery products • foreign fishing activities 6.4. Fisheries MCS system List of means (human resource, equipment, vessels, technology, financial budgets) for fisheries monitoring control and surveillance If available: • No of inspections (land, air, marine) • No. of infractions detected • No. of successful prosecutions concluded • Annual MCS plans and reports 6.5. Fleet structure and outputs Structure of the fishing fleet exporting its catches, notably into the EU (industrial/artisanal & domestic/foreign owned, no. of vessels): • Transhipment of catches from different sources (including high seas) Quantities of raw materials entering fish processing by source, including: • Catches of artisanal and industrial vessels flagged by mission country (by fleet segment if available) and share of the catches exported (notably into the EU) compared to total catches • Landings in the mission country of industrial vessels flagged by other third countries • Imports of fish for processing 6.6. IUU fishing data • Data on extent and nature of IUU fishing (no. vessels, fleet segments, estimated catches and composition)
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Proceedings of the Fourth Forum of the Regional Network of Local Governments Implementing Integrated Coastal Management
    PEMSEA/WP/2005/18 GEF/UNDP/IMO Regional Programme on Partnerships in Environmental Management for the Seas of East Asia Proceedings of the Fourth Forum of the Regional Network of Local Governments Implementing Integrated Coastal Management Building Better Coastal Governance through Stronger Local Alliance Bali, Indonesia 26-28 April 2005 PEMSEA/WP/2005/18 PROCEEDINGS OF THE FOURTH FORUM OF THE REGIONAL NETWORK OF LOCAL GOVERNMENTS IMPLEMENTING INTEGRATED COASTAL MANAGEMENT Building Better Coastal Governance through Stronger Local Alliance GEF/UNDP/IMO Regional Programme on Building Partnerships in Environmental Management for the Seas of East Asia (PEMSEA) RAS/98/G33/A/IG/19 Bali, Indonesia 26-28 April 2005 PROCEEDINGS OF THE FOURTH FORUM OF THE REGIONAL NETWORK OF LOCAL GOVERNMENTS IMPLEMENTING INTEGRATED COASTAL MANAGEMENT Building Better Coastal Governance through Stronger Local Alliance September 2005 This publication may be reproduced in whole or in part and in any form for educational or non-profit purposes or to provide wider dissemination for public response, provided prior written permission is obtained from the Regional Programme Director, acknowledgment of the source is made and no commercial usage or sale of the material occurs. PEMSEA would appreciate receiving a copy of any publication that uses this publication as a source. No use of this publication may be made for resale, any commercial purpose or any purpose other than those given above without a written agreement between PEMSEA and the requesting party. Published by the GEF/UNDP/IMO Regional Programme on Building Partnerships in Environmental Management for the Seas of East Asia Printed in Quezon City, Philippines PEMSEA.
    [Show full text]
  • Coelacanth Discoveries in Madagascar, with AUTHORS: Andrew Cooke1 Recommendations on Research and Conservation Michael N
    Coelacanth discoveries in Madagascar, with AUTHORS: Andrew Cooke1 recommendations on research and conservation Michael N. Bruton2 Minosoa Ravololoharinjara3 The presence of populations of the Western Indian Ocean coelacanth (Latimeria chalumnae) in AFFILIATIONS: 1Resolve sarl, Ivandry Business Madagascar is not surprising considering the vast range of habitats which the ancient island offers. Center, Antananarivo, Madagascar The discovery of a substantial population of coelacanths through handline fishing on the steep volcanic 2Honorary Research Associate, South African Institute for Aquatic slopes of Comoros archipelago initially provided an important source of museum specimens and was Biodiversity, Makhanda, South Africa the main focus of coelacanth research for almost 40 years. The advent of deep-set gillnets, or jarifa, for 3Resolve sarl, Ivandry Business catching sharks, driven by the demand for shark fins and oil from China in the mid- to late 1980s, resulted Center, Antananarivo, Madagascar in an explosion of coelacanth captures in Madagascar and other countries in the Western Indian Ocean. CORRESPONDENCE TO: We review coelacanth catches in Madagascar and present evidence for the existence of one or more Andrew Cooke populations of L. chalumnae distributed along about 1000 km of the southern and western coasts of the island. We also hypothesise that coelacanths are likely to occur around the whole continental margin EMAIL: [email protected] of Madagascar, making it the epicentre of coelacanth distribution in the Western Indian Ocean and the likely progenitor of the younger Comoros coelacanth population. Finally, we discuss the importance and DATES: vulnerability of the population of coelacanths inhabiting the submarine slopes of the Onilahy canyon in Received: 23 June 2020 Revised: 02 Oct.
    [Show full text]
  • Identification of Important Marine Areas Using Ecologically Or Biologically Significant Areas
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by JAMSTEC Repository Identification of important marine areas using ecologically or biologically significant areas (EBSAs) criteria in the East to Southeast Asia region and comparison with existing registered areas for the purpose of conservation Takehisa Yamakitaa,*,‡, Kenji Sudob,* , Yoshie Jintsu-Uchifunea,, Hiroyuki Yamamotoa, Yoshihisa Shirayamaa aJapan Agency for Marine-Earth Science and Technology (JAMSTEC), 2-15 Natsushima-cho, Yokosuka, Kanagawa 237-0061, Japan bAkkeshi Marine Station, Field Science Center for Northern Biosphere, Hokkaido University, Aikappu 1, Akkeshi, Hokkaido 088-1113, Japan *These authors contributed equally to this manuscript; order was decided by the correspondence timeline ‡Corresponding author: Takehisa Yamakita Tel.: +81 46 867 9767 E-mail address:[email protected] 22 23 Abstract 24 The biodiversity of East to Southeast (E–SE) Asian waters is rapidly declining because 25 of anthropogenic effects ranging from local environmental pressures to global warming. 26 To improve marine biodiversity, the Aichi Biodiversity Targets were adopted in 2010. 27 The recommendation of the Subsidiary Body on Scientific, Technical and 28 Technological Advice (SBSTTA), encourages application of the ecologically or 29 biologically significant area (EBSA) process to identify areas for conservation. 30 However, there are few examples of the use of EBSA criteria to evaluate entire oceans. 31 In this article, seven criteria are numerically
    [Show full text]
  • This Is a Peer Reviewed Version Of
    This is a peer reviewed version of the following article: Tulloch, A., Auerbach, N., Avery- Gomm, S., Bayraktarov, E., Butt, N., Dickman, C.R., Ehmke, G., Fisher, D.O., Grantham, H., Holden, M.H., Lavery, T.H., Leseberg, N.P., Nicholls, M., O’Connor, J., Roberson, L., Smyth, A.K., Stone, Z., Tulloch, V., Turak, E., Wardle, G.M., Watson, J.E.M. (2018) A decision tree for assessing the risks and benefits of publishing biodiversity data, Nature Ecology & Evolution, Vol. 2, pp. 1209-1217; which has been published in final form at: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-018-0608-1 1 2 A decision tree for assessing the risks and benefits of publishing 3 biodiversity data 4 Ayesha I.T. Tulloch1,2,3*, Nancy Auerbach4, Stephanie Avery-Gomm4, Elisa Bayraktarov4, Nathalie Butt4, Chris R. 5 Dickman3, Glenn Ehmke5, Diana O. Fisher4, Hedley Grantham2, Matthew H. Holden4, Tyrone H. Lavery6, 6 Nicholas P. Leseberg1, Miles Nicholls7, James O’Connor5, Leslie Roberson4, Anita K. Smyth8, Zoe Stone1, 7 Vivitskaia Tulloch4, Eren Turak9,10, Glenda M. Wardle3, James E.M. Watson1,2 8 1. School of Earth and Environmental Sciences, The University of Queensland, St. Lucia Queensland 4072, 9 Australia 10 2. Wildlife Conservation Society, Global Conservation Program, 2300 Southern Boulevard, Bronx NY 11 10460-1068, USA 12 3. Desert Ecology Research Group, School of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Sydney, 13 Sydney NSW 2006, Australia 14 4. School of Biological Sciences, The University of Queensland, St. Lucia, Brisbane Queensland 4072, 15 Australia 16 5. BirdLife Australia, Melbourne VIC 3053, Australia 17 6.
    [Show full text]
  • Field Surveys on the Indonesian Coelacanth, Latimeria Menadoensis Using Remotely Been Described
    Bull. Kitakyushu Mus. Nat. Hist. Hum. Hist., Ser. A, 17: 49–56, March 31, 2019 Field surveys on the Indonesian coelacanth, Latimeria menadoensis using remotely been described. The aim of this study is to clear their habitat Allometric growth in the extant coelacanth lung during capture of a coelacanth off Madagascar. South African operated vehicles from 2005 to 2015 and distribution. ontogenetic development. Nature Communications, 6: Journal of Science 92: 150–151. 8222. DOI: 10.1038/ncomms9222 POUYAUD, L., WIRJOATMODJO, S., RACHMATIKA, I., TJAKRAWIDJAJA, DE VOS, L. and OYUGI, D. 2002. First capture of a coelacanth, A., HADIATY, R. and HADIE, W. 1999. A new species of Masamitsu IWATA 1, Yoshitaka YABUMOTO2, Toshiro SARUWATARI3,4, Shinya YAMAUCHI1, Kenichi FUJII1, METHODS Latimeria chalumnae SMITH, 1939 (Pisces, Latimeriidae), coelacanth. Genetic and morphologic proof. C. R. 1 1 5 5 6 7 off Kenya. South African Journal of Science, 98: 345–347. Academy of Science, 322: 261–267. Rintaro ISHII , Toshiaki MORI , Frensly D. HUKOM , DIRHAMSYAH , Teguh PERISTIWADY , Augy SYAHAILATUA , Two remotely operated vehicles (ROVs) (Kowa; ERDMANN, M. V., CALDWELL, R. L. and MOOSA, M. K. 1998. SMITH, J. L. B. 1939. The living coelacanth fish from South 8 8 8 1 Kawilarang W. A. MASENGI , Ixchel F. MANDAGI , Fransisco PANGALILA and Yoshitaka ABE VEGA300) were used for the surveys. The first ROV was Indonesian ‘king of the sea’ discovered. Nature, 395: 335. Africa. Nature, 143: 748–750. replaced with the second one in 2007. Our ROVs are able to overhang off Talise Island between 144 and 150 m deep. There again in October 2015 on a steep slope (Table 2: E25, E27).
    [Show full text]
  • 2 Desember 2006
    ISSN 0216-9169 Fauna Indonesia Hystrix brachyura Zo o l o g t i I a n k d a r o a n Pusat Penelitian Biologi - LIPI y e s s a i a Bogor M MZI Fauna Indonesia Fauna Indonesia merupakan Majalah llmiah Populer yang diterbitkan oleh Masyarakat Zoologi Indonesia (MZI). Majalah ini memuat hasil pengamatan ataupun kajian yang berkaitan dengan fauna asli Indonesia, diterbitkan secara berkala dua kali setahun ISSN 0216-9169 Redaksi Mohammad Irham Kartika Dewi Pungki Lupiyaningdyah Nur Rohmatin Isnaningsih Sekretariatan Yuni Apriyanti Yulianto Mitra Bestari Renny Kurnia Hadiaty Ristiyanti M. Marwoto Tata Letak Kartika Dewi R. Taufiq Purna Nugraha Alamat Redaksi Bidang Zoologi Puslit Biologi - LIPI Gd. Widyasatwaloka, Cibinong Science Center JI. Raya Jakarta-Bogor Km. 46 Cibinong 16911 TeIp. (021) 8765056-64 Fax. (021) 8765068 E-mail: [email protected] Foto sampul depan : Hystrix brachyura - Foto : Wartika Rosa Farida PEDOMAN PENULISAN 1. Redaksi FAUNA INDONESIA menerima sumbangan naskah yang belum pernah diterbitkan, dapat berupa hasil pengamatan di lapangan/ laboratorium atau studi pustaka yang terkait dengan fauna asli Indonesia yang bersifat ilmiah popular. 2. Naskah ditulis dalam Bahasa Indonesia dengan summary Bahasa Inggris maksimum 200 kata dengan jarak baris tunggal. 3. Huruf menggunakan tipe Times New Roman 12, jarak baris 1,5 dalam format kertas A4 dengan ukuran margin atas dan bawah 2.5 cm, kanan dan kiri 3 cm. 4. Sistematika penulisan: a. Judul: ditulis huruf besar, kecuali nama ilmiah spesies, dengan ukuran huruf 14. b. Nama pengarang dan instansi/ organisasi. c. Summary d. Pendahuluan e. Isi: i. Jika tulisan berdasarkan pengamatan lapangan/ laboratorium maka dapat dicantumkan cara kerja/ metoda, lokasi dan waktu, hasil, pembahasan.
    [Show full text]
  • Tkpipa/Frp/Sm/X/2014 1
    LIST OF RESEARCH APPLICATION Date 30 October 2014 THE MINISTRY OF RESEARCH AND TECHNOLOGY No. : /TKPIPA/FRP/SM/X/2014 TIM KOORDINASI PEMBERIAN IZIN PENELITIAN A. POSTPONED APPLICATION NO. a. NAME a. RESEARCH PERIOD b. CITIZENSHIP b. LOCATION c. INSTITUTION c. INDONESIAN COUNTERPART STATUS REMARKS d. FUNDING GUARANTOR d. FIELD OF RESEARCH e. POSITION e. RESEARCH TITLE 1 a. Mr. Wanggi Jaung a. 4 months (October 2014 until January 2015) 16/10/2014: Researchers is requested to add b. Korea b. Nusa Tenggara Barat (Lombok) counterpart, Dr Markum from Forestry c. University of British Columbia c. Konsorsium untuk Study dan Pengembangan Department of University of MataramPeneliti Partisipasi (Konsepsi) (Witardi, SE) POSTPONED diminta untuk menambahkan mitra yaitu Dr. d. University of British Columbia d. Ecology e. PhD candidate e. Market Studies for Certification of Forest Ecosystem Services in Lombok B. EXTENSION APPLICATION NO. a. NAME a. RESEARCH PERIOD b. CITIZENSHIP b. LOCATION c. INSTITUTION c. INDONESIAN COUNTERPART STATUS REMARKS d. FUNDING GUARANTOR d. FIELD OF RESEARCH e. POSITION e. RESEARCH TITLE 1 a. Mr. Lukas Ley a. 12 months (March 2014 until. March 2015) SIP No. 100/SIP/FRP/SM/IV/2014 berlaku s.d 9 b. Germany b. DKI Jakarta (Pademangan, Penjaringan), Jabar April 2015 c. University of Toronto c. Fakultas Ilmu Budaya UGM (Dr. Pujo Semedi Hargo 30/10/2014: Researcher's request to add new Yuwono, M.A.) REJECTED research location is rejected. Researcher is d. University of Toronto d. Socio-ecology requested to focus his research at current e. PhD Student e. Living on borrowed time: The Anticipatory Politics of location as stated on initial proposal Vulnerability and Climate Change in Jakarta, Indonesia" 2 a.
    [Show full text]
  • What the Coelacanth Claim? a Significance of In-Situ Conservation
    What the Coelacanth Claim? A Significance of In-Situ Conservation Masamitsu Iwata1, Augy Syahailatua2, Frensly D. Hukom3, Teguh Peristiwady4, Dirhamsyah3, Kawilarang W.A. Masengi5, Yoshitaka Abe1 1Aquamarine Fukushima, Marine Science Museum 2Research Center for Deep Sea, Indonesian Institute of Sciences 3Research Center for Oceanography, Indonesian Institute of Sciences 4Technical Implementation Unit Marine Biota Conservation Bitung, Indonesian Institute of Sciences 5Faculty of Fisheries and Marine Science, Sam Ratulangi University ABSTRACT: There are two species of coelacanth in the world. African coelacanth, Latimeria chalumnae, distributed in the huge area of the east coast of the African continent and islands in front of the continent in the Indian Ocean. On the other hand, Indonesian coelacanth, L. menadoensis, has been found in few regions in Indonesian waters. Aquamarine Fukushima, Marine Science Museum has conducted field surveys in Indonesia since 2005 and found a new habitat in Sulawesi Island and a small island located in the north-west of the New Guinea Island. These activities are collaborated with the Indonesian Institute of Sciences as a national scientific academy and the Sam Ratulangi University as a local academy. Just eight specimens of the Indonesian coelacanth were caught while more than 300 African coelacanth specimens exist. The ecology of the Indonesian coelacanth is still unknown. The local government and economic markets utilize the Indonesian coelacanth as an icon of conservation or sightseeing industry, but it has not succeeded yet because it is difficult to find them which inhabit deep water of more than 150m. Therefore, their conservation is not active yet. Indonesian Institute of Sciences plans to construct a conservation center for the Indonesian coelacanth, and the Aquamarine Fukushima involves in this project by constructing a small supporting facility.
    [Show full text]
  • A Detailed Morphological Measurement of the Seventh Specimen of the Indonesian Coelacanth, First Step for a Re-Description of This Species
    Bull. Kitakyushu Mus. Nat. Hist. Hum. Hist., Ser. A, 17: 67–80, March 31, 2019 A detailed morphological measurement of the seventh specimen of the Indonesian coelacanth, first step for a re-description of this species. from snout to posterior tip of fleshy flap of operculum (3 in POUYAUD, L., WIRJOATMODJO, S., RACHMATIKA, I., L. B. SMITH). The Cape Naturalist, 1: 321–327. [Reprinted Fig. 2A). TJAKRAWIDJAJA, A., HADIATY, R. and HADIE, W. 1999. in Ichthyological papers of J. L. B. SMITH 1931–1943. Latimeria menadoensis, with a compilation of current morphological data of the species Fin area was measured using the following procedures. Une nouvelle espèce de cœlacanthe. Preuves génétiques Vol.2. 409–415.] MATERIALS AND METHODS Outline of each fin was transferred onto A4 sized clear OHP et morphologiques. A new species of coelacanth. Science SMITH, J. L. B. 1940. A living coelacanthid fish from South Toshiro SARUWATARI1,2, Masamitsu IWATA 3, Yoshitaka YABUMOTO4, Frensley D. HUKOM5, sheet. Then fin outline was copied onto 157 g/m2 card stock de la vie Life Sciences, 322: 257–352. Africa. Transactions of the Royal Society of South Africa, 6 3 The seventh specimen of L. menadoensis, CCC No. 299 using carbon paper. Each fin was then cut out, weighed and the SMITH, J. L. B. 1939a. A living fish of Mesozoic type. Nature, 27: 1–106, pls. I–XLIV. [Reprinted in Ichthyological Teguh PERISTIWADY and Yoshitaka ABE (Figs. 1, 2) weight was converted to area in cm2. 143: 455–456. papers of J. L. B. SMITH 1931–1943. Vol.2.
    [Show full text]
  • Pesisir & Lautan Vol. 2, No. 1. 1999
    ISSN 1410-7821, Volume 2, No. 1, 1999 Pemimpin Redaksi (Editor - in- Chief) Dietriech G. Bengen Dewan Redaksi (Editorial Board) Rokhmin Dahuri Ian M. Dutton Richardus F. Kaswadji Jacub Rais Chou Loke Ming Darmawan Neviaty P. Zamani Konsultan Redaksi (Consulting Editors) Herman Haeruman Js. Anugerah Nontji Aprilani Soegiarto Irwandi Idris Sapta Putra Ginting Tridoyo Kusumastanto Chairul Muluk Effendy A. Sumardja Iwan Gunawan Daniel Mohammad Rosyid Gayatrie R. Liley Janny D. Kusen J. Wenno, N.N. Natsir Nessa Sekretaris Redaksi ( Editorial Secretary) Siti Nurwati Hodijah Alamat Redaksi (Editorial Address) Pusat Kajian Sumberdaya Pesisir dan Lautan (Center for Coastal and Marine Resources Studies) Gedung Marine Center Lt. 4, Fakultas Perikanan IPB Kampus IPB Darmaga Bogor 16680 INDONESIA Tel/Fax. 62-251-621086, Tel. 62-251-626380 e-mail: [email protected] Halaman muka: Teluk Manado (foto: Bengen, D.G., 1998) Pada edisi ketiga jurnal “Pesisir & Lautan” ini, kami hadir dengan format dan tampilan yang lebih komunikatif dan menarik. Mengingat bahwa kebutuhan untuk berbagi pengalaman dan pengetahuan terus meningkat, maka berdasarkan saran-saran dan masukan-masukan yang kami peroleh dari para penelaah dan pembaca, jurnal “Pesisir & Lautan” akan hadir ke hadapan Anda tiga kali dalam setahun dimulai sejak penerbitan edisi ketiga ini. Semoga jurnal ini dapat menjadi suatu media informasi bagi para pemerhati maupun praktisi pengelolaan sumberdaya pesisir dan lautan. Selamat membaca dan kontribusi Anda kami nantikan. For the third edition of “Pesisir & Lautan” journal, we have redesigned the format and appearance, in order to make it more attractive and communicative. The need for sharing experience and knowledge is increasing from day to day; hence, in response to many suggestion and inputs from reviewers, readers and subscribers (both domestic and abroad), we have decided that the journal will be published three times a year commencing this edition.
    [Show full text]
  • Message from the Ministry of Marine Affairs and Fisheries for the International Ocean Science, Technology and Policy Symposium 2009"
    MESSAGE FROM THE MINISTRY OF MARINE AFFAIRS AND FISHERIES FOR THE INTERNATIONAL OCEAN SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY AND POLICY SYMPOSIUM 2009" The Government of Indonesia will host the World Ocean Conference 2009 (WOC’09) in Manado, the capital city of North Sulawesi Province, during May 11 - 15, 2009. In conjunction with that global event, the Ministry of Marine Affairs and Fisheries (MMAF) and The Provincial Government of North Sulawesi will co-organize an International Ocean Science, Technology, and Policy Symposium as a side event of the WOC’09. The symposium will be held during May 12 - 14, 2009 at the same site of the WOC’09 venue. The symposium will cover various aspects related to oceans including physical, biological, technological, and social economic. Altogether, there will be 31 different topics to be discussed at parallel sessions during three days activity. It is organized in such a way that participants and speakers may involve in more than one sessions, and freely mobile, in order to gain maximum benefits of their presence. The objective of the symposium is to share information among scientists, managers, practitioners, entrepreneurs, and policy-makers on their recent and current experiences. It is a global arena for participants to introduce their new inventions, great ideas, research findings, derived methods and technologies of production, as well as resource policy advices, in order that everybody may improve his/her capacity in their respective field and specialization. Being a side event of the WOC’09, the symposium may also provide information directly and indirectly to the leaders and prominent figures from around the world who attend the WOC’09, to seek for a common understanding on the benefits and impacts of ocean to world society.
    [Show full text]
  • Coelacanth Genomes Reveal Signatures for Evolutionary Transition from Water to Land
    Downloaded from genome.cshlp.org on October 5, 2021 - Published by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press Submitted to Genome Research Coelacanth genomes reveal signatures for evolutionary transition from water to land Masato Nikaido1*, Hideki Noguchi1,2*, Hidenori Nishihara1*, Atsushi Toyoda2*, Yutaka Suzuki3*, Rei Kajitani1*, Hikoyu Suzuki1, Miki Okuno1, Mitsuto Aibara1, Benjamin P. Ngatunga4, Semvua I. Mzighani4, Hassan W. J. Kalombo5, Kawilarang W. A. Masengi6, Josef Tuda7, Sadao Nogami8, Ryuichiro Maeda9, Masamitsu Iwata10, Yoshitaka Abe10, Koji Fujimura11, Masataka Okabe11, Takanori Amano2, Akiteru Maeno2, Toshihiko Shiroishi2, Takehiko Itoh1†, Sumio Sugano3†, Yuji Kohara2†, Asao Fujiyama2† & Norihiro Okada1,12,13† 1Graduate School of Bioscience and Biotechnology, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Yokohama, Kanagawa 226-8501, Japan 2National Institute of Genetics, Mishima, Shizuoka 411-8540, Japan 3Department of Medical Genome Sciences, Graduate School of Frontier Sciences, The University of Tokyo, Kashiwa City, Chiba 277-0882, Japan 4Tanzania Fisheries Research Institute, P. O. Box 9750, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania 5Regional Commissioner's Office Tanga, P. O. Box 5095, Tanga, Tanzania 6Faculty of Fisheries and Marine Sciences, Sam Ratulangi University, Kampus Unsrat Manado 95115, North Sulawesi, Indonesia 7Department of Medicine, Sam Ratulangi University, Kampus Unsrat Manado 95115, North Sulawesi, Indonesia 8Department of Veterinary Medicine, College of Bioresource Sciences, Nihon University, Fujisawa Kanagawa 252-0880, Japan 9Obihiro University
    [Show full text]