DOCSLIB.ORG

Stoneflies (Plecoptera) of Southern Utah with an Updated Checklist of Utah Species

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Stoneflies (Plecoptera) of Southern Utah with an Updated Checklist of Utah Species Monographs of the Western North American Naturalist Volume 1 Article 2 11-25-2002 Stoneflies (Plecoptera) of southern Utah with an updated checklist of Utah species Ronald G. Call Richard W. Baumann Brigham Young University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/mwnan Recommended Citation Call, Ronald G. and Baumann, Richard W. (2002) "Stoneflies (Plecoptera) of southern Utah with an updated checklist of Utah species," Monographs of the Western North American Naturalist: Vol. 1 , Article 2. Available at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/mwnan/vol1/iss1/2 This Monograph is brought to you for free and open access by the Western North American Naturalist Publications at BYU ScholarsArchive. It has been accepted for inclusion in Monographs of the Western North American Naturalist by an authorized editor of BYU ScholarsArchive. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. Monographs of the Western North American Naturalist 1, © 2002, pp. 65–89 STONEFLIES (PLECOPTERA) OF SOUTHERN UTAH WITH AN UPDATED CHECKLIST OF UTAH SPECIES Ronald G. Call1,4 and Richard W. Baumann2,3 ABSTRACT.—Southern Utah comprises 4 major physiographic divisions: the Great Basin, Colorado Plateau, Central Rocky Mountains, and Southern Rocky Mountains, which have been partitioned into faunal regions. We discuss the uniqueness of southern Utah and the amount of land set aside for recreation and preservation, and we encourage the study and preservation of its water resources. The stonefly (Plecoptera) fauna of 13 counties in southern Utah was sur- veyed. We found 58 species representing 34 genera and 8 families. Three new state records for Utah and many new county records for southern Utah are presented, along with a discussion of distribution patterns and faunal affinities of each species. Distribution patterns indicate a historical connection between the Sevier River and the Colorado drainage and a separation of faunal areas within the Central Rocky Mountains at boundaries between the Wasatch Mountains, Wasatch Plateau, and the Southern High Plateau. The uniqueness of the isolated Abajo and LaSal Mountains, the Virgin River valley, and other faunal areas in southern Utah is presented. Key words: Plecoptera, stoneflies, aquatic insects, Utah, species inventory. Southern Utah is famous for its spectacular population growth. Washington County, in the outdoor scenery. The area has long been southwestern corner of the state, experienced appreciated and grows in popularity each year. the largest increase in population. St. George, Tourism in southern Utah is increasing, as are the largest city of Washington County, had the conservation efforts in the region. The designa- 2nd largest percentage population increase of tion of the 1.7-million-acre Grand Staircase– any city in the state for the past 6 years, over Escalante National Monument in southern 36% (Governor’s Office of Planning and Bud- Utah in 1997 (Maurer and Beath 1997) is per- get 1998). haps the greatest evidence of growing interest Utah is a treasure trove of natural beauty. in the preservation of the area. Greater under- Southern Utah contains all 5 of the state’s na- standing of southern Utah’s living resources is tional parks, 5 of its 7 national monuments, 4 of essential to wise management decisions in the the state’s 8 national forests, 1 national recre- face of increasing tourism and population ation area, 7 designated wilderness areas, and growth. 20 state parks (Utah Travel Council 1999). With Utah has the 2nd highest birth rate and the approximately 69% of its land federally owned 2nd lowest death rate of any state in the nation, (U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of which together contribute significantly to Land Management, Utah State Office 1997), Utah’s high population growth. With the addi- Utah ranks 2nd among states in amount of tion of a high rate of in-migration, Utah has federally owned land, next to Nevada, which one of the fastest growing populations of any lists 77% of its land as federally owned (U.S. state. Although currently about 77% of Utah’s Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land population lives along the Wasatch Mountain Management 1999). However, nearly 4.5% of Range in northern Utah, this condition is chang- Nevada’s land is federally managed under the ing. From 1980 to 1996, northern Utah, which Department of Defense (Nevada Division of includes the urban centers of the Wasatch State Lands 1995), while in Utah a higher per- Mountain Range, experienced an average annual centage of federal land is set aside as national population growth of 1.67%, while southern parks, national monuments, national recreation Utah experienced a 1.74% average annual areas, and national forests. Utah ranks highest 1Richfield High School, Richfield, UT 84701. 2Department of Integrative Biology, and Monte L. Bean Life Science Museum, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT 84602. 3Author to whom reprint requests should be sent. 4Present address: Madison High School, Rexburg, ID 83460. 65 66 MONOGRAPHS OF THE WESTERN NORTH AMERICAN NATURALIST [No. 1 among the continental states in the proportion such as stoneflies. Stoneflies typically inhabit of its land designated for public recreation and cool streams and rivers. They are excellent in- preservation. While it is true that more feder- dicators of changing water conditions and qual- ally owned land, over 50 million acres, is spec- ity and can aid in understanding the diversity ified for preservation and recreation in Alaska and uniqueness of areas. Information relative than in Utah, which has approximately 11.7 to stonefly species inhabiting the area may be million acres, nearly 9 million visits are made useful in helping determine which areas are to public recreation sites in Utah annually com- most critical to preserve and in making man- pared to approximately 2 million annual visits agement decisions involving the use of water in Alaska. Utah ranks 8th among the states for resources. number of annual visits to recreational sites The species composition and distribution of managed by the National Park Service (U.S. stoneflies in Utah is perhaps the best known Department of the Interior, National Park Ser- of any state in the western United States (Tan- vice 1998). Southern Utah, in particular, is ner 1940, Gaufin et al. 1966, Baumann 1975, unique. Nearly 7.7 million of approximately 30 Baumann et al. 1977). Previous knowledge of million acres of land in southern Utah is pub- Plecoptera in Utah is primarily the result of licly owned as national parks, national monu- the work of the late Arden R. Gaufin and his ments, national recreation areas, national forests, students at the University of Utah. In 1966, and state parks. That is over 25% of the area of Gaufin listed 71 species, 18 genera, and 5 fam- southern Utah (U.S. Department of the Inte- ilies of Plecoptera as occurring in Utah. Since rior, Bureau of Land Management, Utah State that time many subgenera have been raised to Office 1997; U.S. Department of the Interior, generic status, and several subfamilies have National Park Service 1998; Utah Travel Coun- been elevated to family status (Illies 1966). cil 1999). No other area in the country has The most recent publication providing a state such a large proportion of land allocated for list of species occurring in Utah listed 75 species preservation and recreation by both state and in 34 genera and 8 families (Baumann 1973). federal agencies. These facts are presented to New records were added in 1977, document- emphasize that Utah has both a large amount ing the occurrence in Utah of 77 stonefly spe- of land designated for recreation and preser- cies in 35 genera and 8 families (Baumann et vation and an increasing number of people al. 1977). Stanger and Baumann (1993) de- visiting these unique sites. Despite these facts, scribed a new species from the state, Surdick little research has been done regarding the (1995) included the description of a near chlor- biological components of the varied ecosys- operlid from southeastern Utah, and House- tems of southern Utah. man and Baumann (1997) recorded 5 species Arid conditions throughout southern Utah previously unrecorded from the state. place a premium on freshwater. Virtually all Most knowledge of stoneflies in Utah comes municipal waterworks systems in Utah tap from sites in the Central Rocky Mountain, groundwater resources through springs and Uintah Basin, Columbia Plateau, and Great wells. Expanding human population and agri- Basin areas in the northern part of the state culture will place even greater demands on (Gaufin et al. 1966, Baumann and Gaufin 1969, southern Utah’s freshwater supplies in the Baumann et al. 1977, Houseman and Baumann future, groundwater as well as streams and 1997). The southern Utah stonefly fauna is rivers. The city of St. George, southern Utah’s poorly known compared to that of northern largest city, already pays the highest price for Utah. This has resulted from the major univer- water in the state (Governor’s Office of Plan- sities in Utah all being located in the northern ning and Budget 1998). A large proportion of part of the state: University of Utah, Salt Lake precipitation in southern Utah is received in City; Brigham Young University, Provo; and the form of winter snows, which form the largest Utah State University, Logan. These 3 institu- freshwater reserve in the area (Harper et al. tions have all been instrumental in providing 1994). Because of the importance and relative researchers and facilities to house insect col- rarity of freshwater in this area, it is important lections. Consequently, due to both time and to gain a greater understanding of all aspects budget constraints, much more research has of the area’s aquatic resources. One method of been conducted in northern Utah than in south- gaining this insight is by studying aquatic insects ern Utah.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • UMNP Mountains Manual 2017
    Mountain Adventures Manual utahmasternaturalist.org June 2017 UMN/Manual/2017-03pr Welcome to Utah Master Naturalist! Utah Master Naturalist was developed to help you initiate or continue your own personal journey to increase your understanding of, and appreciation for, Utah’s amazing natural world. We will explore and learn aBout the major ecosystems of Utah, the plant and animal communities that depend upon those systems, and our role in shaping our past, in determining our future, and as stewards of the land. Utah Master Naturalist is a certification program developed By Utah State University Extension with the partnership of more than 25 other organizations in Utah. The mission of Utah Master Naturalist is to develop well-informed volunteers and professionals who provide education, outreach, and service promoting stewardship of natural resources within their communities. Our goal, then, is to assist you in assisting others to develop a greater appreciation and respect for Utah’s Beautiful natural world. “When we see the land as a community to which we belong, we may begin to use it with love and respect.” - Aldo Leopold Participating in a Utah Master Naturalist course provides each of us opportunities to learn not only from the instructors and guest speaKers, But also from each other. We each arrive at a Utah Master Naturalist course with our own rich collection of knowledge and experiences, and we have a unique opportunity to share that Knowledge with each other. This helps us learn and grow not just as individuals, but together as a group with the understanding that there is always more to learn, and more to share.
    [Show full text]
  • Capnia Lineata (Hanson 1943) Straight Stonefly Plecoptera: Capniidae
    Capnia lineata (Hanson 1943) Straight stonefly Plecoptera: Capniidae Profile prepared by Celeste Mazzacano, The Xerces Society for Invertebrate Conservation SUMMARY Capnia lineata is small winter stone fly endemic to northwestern Idaho. It is known primarily from a few streams near Troy, Idaho in Latah County, including Little Boulder Creek. This species’ limited habitat may be threatened with degradation from extensive recreational use in the region from which it is known. Global climate change could also threaten this species’ habitat in the long-term. Research should focus on determining the true distribution of this species, the status and size of existing populations, and the potential presence of additional populations at suitable habitat in the region. Assessment and strengthening of current management practices for known habitat would also be beneficial. CONSERVATION STATUS Rankings: Canada – Species at Risk Act: N/A Canada – provincial status: N/A Mexico: N/A USA – Endangered Species Act: N/A USA – state status: Idaho S1 Critically imperiled; California SNR Not ranked NatureServe: G3 Vulnerable IUCN Red List: N/A SPECIES PROFILE DESCRIPTION Adult females are larger than males; their bodies are 7-8 mm (0.28-0.31 in.) in length, as are their forewings. Females have a small, reduced medial bridge between the 7th and 8th abdominal segments that appears embedded in the intersegmental membrane, a diagnostic characteristic that helps separate them from other closely related species. Males are brachypterous, i.e. they have extremely reduced wings. The forewings are so small that they have no apparent veins, and the hindwings are reduced even further (Hanson 1943).
    [Show full text]
  • Far Eastern Entomologist Number 417: 17-24 October 2020
    Far Eastern Entomologist ISSN 1026-051X (print edition) Number 417: 17-24 ISSN 2713-2196 (online edition) October 2020 https://doi.org/10.25221/fee.417.3 http://zoobank.org/References/55C17BCB-CA08-4FA8-AC46-10C19524D817 FIRST REPORT OF VIVIPARITY OF THE STONEFLIES CAPNIA KHINGANA (PLECOPTERA: CAPNIIDAE) IN THE LOW AMUR RIVER BASIN V. A. Teslenko1), N. M. Yavorskaya2) 1) Federal Scientific Center of the East Asia terrestrial biodiversity, Far Eastern Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, Vladivostok, 690022, Russia. *Corresponding author, E-mail: [email protected] 2) Institute of Water and Ecological Problems, Far Eastern Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, Khabarovsk, 680000, Russia. E-mail: [email protected] Summary. For the first time on the south of the Russian Far East, in small cool spring- like streams of the Low Amur River Basin, viviparity or live-bearing reproduction of stone- flies Capnia khingana (Plecoptera: Capniidae) was recorded. Apparently, the development of nymphs in eggs takes more than two months. Mature embryos were found throughout the abdomen, thorax, and head of C. khingana females, their number varied from 178 to 124. The first-instar nymphs hatched inside female body and exiting under the genital plate had head capsule with apparent eyespots, thorax, abdomen, legs, cerci and antennae. The lengths of the firs-instar nymphs varied from 910.33 to 920.35 μm, and the width of the head capsule, from 161.85 to 171.13 μm. Key words: stoneflies, viviparity, oviparity, first instar nymphs, streams, Russian Far East. В. А. Тесленко, Н. М. Яворская. Первое сообщение о живорождении у веснянки Capnia khingana (Plecoptera: Capniidae) в бассейне Нижнего Амура // Дальневосточный энтомолог.
    [Show full text]
  • The Science Behind Volcanoes
    The Science Behind Volcanoes A volcano is an opening, or rupture, in a planet's surface or crust, which allows hot magma, volcanic ash and gases to escape from the magma chamber below the surface. Volcanoes are generally found where tectonic plates are diverging or converging. A mid-oceanic ridge, for example the Mid-Atlantic Ridge, has examples of volcanoes caused by divergent tectonic plates pulling apart; the Pacific Ring of Fire has examples of volcanoes caused by convergent tectonic plates coming together. By contrast, volcanoes are usually not created where two tectonic plates slide past one another. Volcanoes can also form where there is stretching and thinning of the Earth's crust in the interiors of plates, e.g., in the East African Rift, the Wells Gray-Clearwater volcanic field and the Rio Grande Rift in North America. This type of volcanism falls under the umbrella of "Plate hypothesis" volcanism. Volcanism away from plate boundaries has also been explained as mantle plumes. These so- called "hotspots", for example Hawaii, are postulated to arise from upwelling diapirs with magma from the core–mantle boundary, 3,000 km deep in the Earth. Erupting volcanoes can pose many hazards, not only in the immediate vicinity of the eruption. Volcanic ash can be a threat to aircraft, in particular those with jet engines where ash particles can be melted by the high operating temperature. Large eruptions can affect temperature as ash and droplets of sulfuric acid obscure the sun and cool the Earth's lower atmosphere or troposphere; however, they also absorb heat radiated up from the Earth, thereby warming the stratosphere.
    [Show full text]
  • The Leuctridae of Eastern Canada (Insecta; Plecoptera)
    The Leuctridae of Eastern Canada (Insecta; P1ecoptera)l P. P. HARPER^ AND H. B. N. HYNES Department of Biology, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario Received December 14. 1970 HARPER,P. P., and H. B. N. HYNES.1971. The Leuctridae of Eastern Canada (Insecta: Plecoptera). Can. J. Zool. 49: 915-920. After a short discussion of the taxonomy of the adult Leuctridae of Eastern Canada, the nymphs of the eight most common species are described and a key for their identification is proposed. Aprks une courte discussion de la systematique des Leuctridae adultes de 1'Est %adien, on dkrit les larves des huit esp6ces les plus rkpandues et on propose une clef pour leur dktemation. Introduction sara (Claassen) (as L. occidentalis Banks). Two The Leuctridae have not reached, in North further species that occur in Eastern Canada America, the great development and the variety have since been described: L. maria Hanson they have attained in Europe; indeed, there are (male genitalia in Hanson (1941b) and female only 10 species at present recorded from Eastern genitalia in Ricker (1952)) and L. baddecka Canada. Of these, L. triloba Claassen has been Ricker (female genitalia in Ricker (1965); the collected only once in extreme Southern Quebec male is unknown). Keys to the males are pre- (Ricker et al. 1968), and L. baddecka is known sented by Needham and Claassen (1925) and only from the type locality on Cape Breton more recently by Hitchcock (1969). No key to Island (Ricker 1965). The other species are the females is presently available, but their fairly common and widespread.
    [Show full text]
  • Ohio EPA Macroinvertebrate Taxonomic Level December 2019 1 Table 1. Current Taxonomic Keys and the Level of Taxonomy Routinely U
    Ohio EPA Macroinvertebrate Taxonomic Level December 2019 Table 1. Current taxonomic keys and the level of taxonomy routinely used by the Ohio EPA in streams and rivers for various macroinvertebrate taxonomic classifications. Genera that are reasonably considered to be monotypic in Ohio are also listed. Taxon Subtaxon Taxonomic Level Taxonomic Key(ies) Species Pennak 1989, Thorp & Rogers 2016 Porifera If no gemmules are present identify to family (Spongillidae). Genus Thorp & Rogers 2016 Cnidaria monotypic genera: Cordylophora caspia and Craspedacusta sowerbii Platyhelminthes Class (Turbellaria) Thorp & Rogers 2016 Nemertea Phylum (Nemertea) Thorp & Rogers 2016 Phylum (Nematomorpha) Thorp & Rogers 2016 Nematomorpha Paragordius varius monotypic genus Thorp & Rogers 2016 Genus Thorp & Rogers 2016 Ectoprocta monotypic genera: Cristatella mucedo, Hyalinella punctata, Lophopodella carteri, Paludicella articulata, Pectinatella magnifica, Pottsiella erecta Entoprocta Urnatella gracilis monotypic genus Thorp & Rogers 2016 Polychaeta Class (Polychaeta) Thorp & Rogers 2016 Annelida Oligochaeta Subclass (Oligochaeta) Thorp & Rogers 2016 Hirudinida Species Klemm 1982, Klemm et al. 2015 Anostraca Species Thorp & Rogers 2016 Species (Lynceus Laevicaudata Thorp & Rogers 2016 brachyurus) Spinicaudata Genus Thorp & Rogers 2016 Williams 1972, Thorp & Rogers Isopoda Genus 2016 Holsinger 1972, Thorp & Rogers Amphipoda Genus 2016 Gammaridae: Gammarus Species Holsinger 1972 Crustacea monotypic genera: Apocorophium lacustre, Echinogammarus ischnus, Synurella dentata Species (Taphromysis Mysida Thorp & Rogers 2016 louisianae) Crocker & Barr 1968; Jezerinac 1993, 1995; Jezerinac & Thoma 1984; Taylor 2000; Thoma et al. Cambaridae Species 2005; Thoma & Stocker 2009; Crandall & De Grave 2017; Glon et al. 2018 Species (Palaemon Pennak 1989, Palaemonidae kadiakensis) Thorp & Rogers 2016 1 Ohio EPA Macroinvertebrate Taxonomic Level December 2019 Taxon Subtaxon Taxonomic Level Taxonomic Key(ies) Informal grouping of the Arachnida Hydrachnidia Smith 2001 water mites Genus Morse et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Scipio Irrigation Company Ivie Creek Pipeline Project - Watersmart
    Draft Environmental Assessment Scipio Irrigation Company Ivie Creek Pipeline Project - WaterSMART PRO-EA-16-026 Upper Colorado Region Provo Area Office Provo, Utah U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Reclamation Provo Area Office Provo, Utah May 2017 Mission Statements The mission of the Department of the Interior protects and manages the Nation’s natural resources and cultural heritage; provides scientific and other information about those resources; and honors its trust responsibilities or special commitments to American Indians, Alaska Natives, and affiliated island communities. The mission of the Bureau of Reclamation is to manage, develop, and protect water and related resources in an environmentally and economically sound manner in the interest of the American public. Draft Environmental Assessment Scipio Irrigation Company Ivie Creek Pipeline Project – WaterSMART Upper Colorado Region Provo Area Office Provo, Utah Interdisciplinary Team Leader Jared Baxter Bureau of Reclamation Provo Area Office 302 East 1860 South Provo, UT 84606 801-379-1081 [email protected] U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Reclamation Provo Area Office Provo, Utah May 2017 Contents Page Chapter 1 Purpose of and Need for Proposed Action ...................................... 1 1.1 Introduction .......................................................................................... 1 1.2 Background .......................................................................................... 1 1.3 Purpose of and Need for Proposed Action ..........................................
    [Show full text]
  • Documented by Mcdonald and Harbaugh (1988) Was Used for This Sirrulation
    srATE OF UTAH DEPAR'IMENI' OF NATURAL RESCURCES Tedmical Publication lb. 102 GROUND-WATER HYrROLCGY OF THE UPPER SE.VIER RIVER BASIN, SClJIH-cENrnAL UTAH, AID SIMULATION OF GROUND-WATER F'I.(W IN THE VALLEY-FILL AlJJIFER IN PAN:lliI'ICH VALLEY By Susan A. 'Ihiros am William C. Brothers Prepared by the Uni ted States Geological Survey in cooperation with the Utah Departnent of Natural Resources Division of water Rights 1993 Page Abstract 1 Introduction ••••••• I Purp:>se arrl soope 3 Methods of investigation . 3 Ackoowledgnents 3 Numberi~ system for hydrologic-data sites •••••••••••••• 3 Description of the study area ................................... 4 Geologic setti~ ........................................... 6 Climate .................................................... 8 vegetation . 9 Iarrluse ................................................... 10 Surface-water hydrology .................................... 10 Ground-water hydrology of oonsolidated rocks 11 Ground-water hydrology of the valley-fill aquifer in Panguitch Valley 13 Recharge 14 seepage fran streams 14 seepage fran caIla.1s ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• 15 seepage fran unconsuned irrigation water ••••••••••••••••• 16 Infiltration of precipitation •••••••••••••••••••••••• 22 seepage fran consolidated rock ....................... 22 Movanent 22 Discharge 23 seepage to the Sevier River and canals ••••••••••••••••••• 23 E.Va]?CJtraIlSpiration . 24 Springs 25 wells 25 Slll:::surfare outfl~ •••••••••..•.••••••.•••••••••••••••••.••• 26 Water-level fluctuations 26
    [Show full text]
  • Factors Affecting Cottonwood Recruitment in Zion National Park
    Factors Affecting Cottonwood Recruitment in Zion National Park Final Report to National Park Service CPCESU, Project number OSU 3 and OSU 4 Cooperative Agreement CA# H1200040002 By William J. Ripple1 and Robert L. Beschta College of Forestry Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR 97331 E-mail: [email protected] Phone: (541) 737-3956 Fax: (541) 737-3049 January 29, 2007 1 Corresponding author 1 Factors Affecting Cottonwood Recruitment in Zion National Park Abstract The strength of top-down forces in terrestrial food webs is highly debated as there are few examples illustrating the role of large mammalian carnivores in structuring biotic and abiotic systems. Based on the results of this study we hypothesize that an increase in human visitation within Zion Canyon of Zion National Park ultimately resulted in a catastrophic regime shift through pathways involving trophic cascades and abiotic environmental changes. Increases in human visitors in Zion canyon apparently reduced cougar (Puma concolor) densities, which subsequently led to higher mule deer (Odocoileus hemionus) densities, higher browsing intensities and reduced recruitment of riparian cottonwood trees (Populus fremontii), increased bank erosion, and reductions in both terrestrial and aquatic species abundance. These results may have broad implications with regard to our understanding of alternative ecosystem states where large carnivores have been removed or are being recovered. Key Words: predator, cottonwood, deer, stream, biodiversity, Leopold 2 Introduction Humans can have a major role in food web dynamics by displacing or extirpating top predators. Over a half century ago, the iconoclast Aldo Leopold was among the first to argue that elimination of large mammalian predators had strong top-down influences on ecosystems (Leopold et al., 1947).
    [Show full text]
  • Fishlake National Forest Visitor Guide
    ishlake National Forest F VISITOR GUIDE Blazing the Trail Fish Lake surrounded by fall colors Craggy cliff in the Tushar Mountains Beehive Peak area ising as an oasis in central Utah, the mountains and plateaus of the Fishlake National Forest offer What’s Inside an accessible landscape for anyone with a sense of R Get to Know Us ................. 2 adventure. Fish Lake, from which the forest takes Special Places ...................... 3 its name, is considered by many to be the gem of Scenic Byways ..................... 4 Utah. Many other scenic spots reveal secrets and Activities ............................... 4 stories of past settlements and civilizations. Map ......................................... 6 Campgrounds ..................... 8 Routes and Trails ....................................... 9 Fast Forest Facts trails on Know Before You Go.......10 the forest— Contact Information .......12 Elevation Range: 4,760’–12,174’ such as Acres: 1.5 million the nationally known Paiute ATV Trail system—are a means to access Miles of Designated Motorized Routes: 2,182 miles of roads and opportunities such as hunting, fishing, 655 miles of motorized trails and wildlife viewing. Camping is also popular, but if you’d rather drive a Amazing Features: An aspen stand near Fish Lake is considered scenic byway or hike a trail the most massive living organism in solitude, we have those on earth opportunities as well. Come see for yourself! This Visitor Guide provides the information you need to make the most of your Fishlake National Forest experience. G et to Know Us © Kapu History he resources of the Fishlake National Forest in central UtahT are vital to surrounding communities, a point not lost on President McKinley who reserved the first unit of the forest in 1899.
    [Show full text]
  • Kenai National Wildlife Refuge Species List, Version 2018-07-24
    Kenai National Wildlife Refuge Species List, version 2018-07-24 Kenai National Wildlife Refuge biology staff July 24, 2018 2 Cover image: map of 16,213 georeferenced occurrence records included in the checklist. Contents Contents 3 Introduction 5 Purpose............................................................ 5 About the list......................................................... 5 Acknowledgments....................................................... 5 Native species 7 Vertebrates .......................................................... 7 Invertebrates ......................................................... 55 Vascular Plants........................................................ 91 Bryophytes ..........................................................164 Other Plants .........................................................171 Chromista...........................................................171 Fungi .............................................................173 Protozoans ..........................................................186 Non-native species 187 Vertebrates ..........................................................187 Invertebrates .........................................................187 Vascular Plants........................................................190 Extirpated species 207 Vertebrates ..........................................................207 Vascular Plants........................................................207 Change log 211 References 213 Index 215 3 Introduction Purpose to avoid implying
    [Show full text]
  • Water Resources of Millard County, Utah
    WATER RESOURCES OF MILLARD COUNTY, UTAH by Fitzhugh D. Davis Utah Geological Survey, retired OPEN-FILE REPORT 447 May 2005 UTAH GEOLOGICAL SURVEY a division of UTAH DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES Although this product represents the work of professional scientists, the Utah Department of Natural Resources, Utah Geological Survey, makes no warranty, stated or implied, regarding its suitability for a particular use. The Utah Department of Natural Resources, Utah Geological Survey, shall not be liable under any circumstances for any direct, indirect, special, incidental, or consequential damages with respect to claims by users of this product. This Open-File Report makes information available to the public in a timely manner. It may not conform to policy and editorial standards of the Utah Geological Survey. Thus it may be premature for an individual or group to take action based on its contents. WATER RESOURCES OF MILLARD COUNTY, UTAH by Fitzhugh D. Davis Utah Geological Survey, retired 2005 This open-file release makes information available to the public in a timely manner. It may not conform to policy and editorial standards of the Utah Geological Survey. Thus it may be premature for an individual or group to take action based on its contents. Although this product is the work of professional scientists, the Utah Department of Natural Resources, Utah Geological Survey, makes no warranty, expressed or implied, regarding its suitability for a particular use. The Utah Department of Natural Resources, Utah Geological Survey, shall not be liable under any circumstances for any direct, indirect, special, incidental, or consequential damages with respect to claims by users of this product.
    [Show full text]