DOCSLIB.ORG

Physical Data and Biological Data for Algae, Aquatic Invertebrates, and Fish from Selected Reaches on the Carson and Truckee Rivers, Nevada and California, 1993–97

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Physical Data and Biological Data for Algae, Aquatic Invertebrates, and Fish from Selected Reaches on the Carson and Truckee Rivers, Nevada and California, 1993–97 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Physical Data and Biological Data for Algae, Aquatic Invertebrates, and Fish from Selected Reaches on the Carson and Truckee Rivers, Nevada and California, 1993–97 Open-File Report 02–012 Prepared as part of the NATIONAL WATER-QUALITY ASSESSMENT PROGRAM U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Physical Data and Biological Data for Algae, Aquatic Invertebrates, and Fish from Selected Reaches on the Carson and Truckee Rivers, Nevada and California, 1993–97 By Stephen J. Lawrence and Ralph L. Seiler Open-File Report 02–012 Prepared as part of the NATIONAL WATER QUALITY ASSESSMENT PROGRAM Carson City, Nevada 2002 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR GALE A. NORTON, Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY CHARLES G. GROAT, Director Any use of trade, product, or firm names in this publication is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government For additional information contact: District Chief U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Geological Survey Information Services 333 West Nye Lane, Room 203 Building 810 Carson City, NV 89706–0866 Box 25286, Federal Center Denver, CO 80225–0286 email: [email protected] http://nevada.usgs.gov CONTENTS Abstract.................................................................................................................................................................................. 1 Introduction............................................................................................................................................................................ 2 Background ................................................................................................................................................................ 2 Purpose and Scope ..................................................................................................................................................... 2 Study area and Data Collection Sites..................................................................................................................................... 2 Data Collection Methods ....................................................................................................................................................... 4 Physical Data.............................................................................................................................................................. 4 Semi-Quantitative Samples of Algae and Aquatic Invertebrate ................................................................................ 4 Qualitative Samples of Algae and Aquatic Invertebrate ............................................................................................ 4 Algae .......................................................................................................................................................................... 5 Sampling Methods.......................................................................................................................................... 5 Sample Processing, Identification and Enumeration...................................................................................... 5 Aquatic Invertebrates ................................................................................................................................................. 5 Sampling Methods.......................................................................................................................................... 5 Sample Processing, Identification and Enumeration...................................................................................... 6 Fish Sampling Methods.............................................................................................................................................. 6 Compilations of Physical and Biological Data...................................................................................................................... 7 References Cited ................................................................................................................................................................... 7 FIGURES 1. Map showing location of data collection sites on the Carson and Truckee Rivers, Nevada and California.......... 3 APPENDIX 1. Physical characteristics of the richest-targeted habitat during algae and aquatic invertebrate sample collection at sites on the Carson and Truckee Rivers, 1993–96 2. Algae identified in samples collected at sites on the Carson and Truckee Rivers, 1993–96 3–7. Algal density in richest-targeted habitat at sites on the Carson River: 3. East Fork Carson River near Dresslerville, Nev. (site 1), 1993–96 4. East Fork Carson River at Minden, Nev. (site 2), and Carson River near Carson City, Nev. (site 6), 1994–95 5. West Fork Carson River above Woodfords, Calif. (site 3), West Fork Carson River at Paynesville, Calif. (site 4), and West Fork Carson River at Muller Lane near Minden, Nev. (site 5), 1994–95 6. Carson River at Deer Run Road near Carson City, Nev. (site 7), and Carson River at Dayton, Nev. (site 8), 1993–95 7. Carson River near Fort Churchill, Nev. (site 9), 1993–96 8–12. Algal density in the depositional-targeted habitat at sites on the Carson River: 8. East Fork Carson River near Dresslerville, Nev. (site 1), 1993–96 9. West Fork Carson River above Woodfords, Calif. (site 3), West Fork Carson River at Paynesville, Calif. (site 4), and West Fork Carson River at Muller Lane near Minden, Nev. (site 5), 1994–95 10. East Fork Carson River at Minden, Nev. (site 2), Carson River near Carson City, Nev. (site 6), and Carson River at Deer Run Road near Carson City, Nev. (site 7), 1993–95 11. Carson River at Dayton, Nev. (site 8), and Carson River at Tarzyn Road near Fallon, Nev. (site 10), 1993 and 1995 12. Carson River near Fort Churchill, Nev. (site 9), 1993–96 CONTENTS III 13–17. Algal density in the richest-targeted habitat at sites on the Truckee River: 13. Truckee River at Farad, Calif. (site 12), 1993–96 14. Upper Truckee River at South Lake Tahoe, Calif. (site 11), Truckee River at Mayberry Drive below Lawton, Nev. (site 13), and Truckee River at Idlewild Park at Reno, Nev. (site 14), 1993–95 15. Truckee River near Sparks, Nev. (site 15), and Truckee River at Lockwood, Nev. (site 16), 1993–95 16. Truckee River at Clark, Nev. (site 17), 1993–96 17. Truckee River at Wadsworth, Nev. (site 18), Truckee River at Dead Ox Wash near Nixon, Nev. (site 19), and Truckee River at Highway 447 at Nixon, Nev. (site 20), 1993–95 18–21. Algal density in depositional-targeted habitat at sites on the Truckee River: 18. Upper Truckee River at South Lake Tahoe, Calif. (site 11), and Truckee River at Farad, Calif. (site 12), 1993 and 1995 19. Truckee River at Mayberry Drive below Lawton, Nev. (site 13), Truckee River at Idlewild Park at Reno, Nev. (site 14), and Truckee River near Sparks, Nev. (site 15), 1994–95 20. Truckee River at Clark, Nev. (site 17), 1993–96 21. Truckee River at Lockwood, Nev. (site 16), Truckee River at Wadsworth, Nev. (site 18), and Truckee River at Dead Ox Wash near Nixon, Nev. (site 19), 1993–95 22. Ash-free dry weight, dry weight, and chlorophyll concentrations in algal samples collected at sites on the Carson and Truckee Rivers, Nevada and California, 1993–96 23. Aquatic invertebrates identified in samples collected at sites on the Carson and Truckee Rivers, 1993–95 24-26. Number of aquatic invertebrates per square meter in the richest-targeted habitat at sites on the Carson River: 24. August to September 1993 25. July 1994 26. September 1995 27–29. Number of aquatic invertebrates per square meter in the richest-targeted habitat at sites on the Truckee River: 27. September 1993 28. June–July 1994 29. September to October 1995 30. Fish identified in samples collected at sites on the Carson and Truckee Rivers, 1993–97 31–33. Data for fish and crayfish collected at sites on the Carson River: 31. East Fork Carson River near Dresslerville, Nev. (site 1), 1993–95 32. Carson River at Deer Run Road near Carson City, Nev. (site 7), October 6, 1993 33. Carson River at Fort Churchill, Nev. (site 9), 1993–96 34–38. Data for fish and crayfish collected at sites on the Truckee River: 34. Upper Truckee River at South Lake Tahoe, Calif. (site 11), October 1, 1993 35. Truckee River at Farad, Calif. (site 12), 1993–96 36. Truckee River near Sparks, Nev. (site 15), September 30, 1993 37. Truckee River at Clark, Nev. (site 17), 1993–97 38. Truckee River at Dead Ox Wash near Nixon, Nev. (site 19), October 5, 1993 IV Physical Data and Biological Data from Selected Reaches on the Carson and Truckee Rivers, Nevada and California, 1993–97 CONVERSION FACTORS AND VERTICAL DATUM Multiply By To obtain centimeter (cm) 0.39370 inch millimeter (mm) 0.03937 inch micrometer (Nm) 0.00003937 inch meter (m) 3.28084 foot square centimeter (cm2) 0.15500 square inch square meter (m2) 10.76391 square foot milliliter (mL) 0.000264179 gallon liter (L) 0.264179 gallon cubic meter per second (m3/s) 35.31467 cubic foot per second Other units used in this report: ggram g/m2 gram per square meter mg milligram mg/m2 milligram per square meter Temperature: Degrees Celsius (oC) can be converted to degrees Fahrenheit (oF) by using the formula oF = [1.8(oC)]+32. Degrees Fahrenheit can be converted to degrees Celsius by using the formula oC = 0.556(oF-32). Sea level: In this report, “sea level” refers to the National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929 (NGVD of 1929, formerly called
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Mitochondrial Genome of the Stonefly Kamimuria Wangi (Plecoptera: Perlidae) and Phylogenetic Position of Plecoptera Based on Mitogenomes
    Mitochondrial Genome of the Stonefly Kamimuria wangi (Plecoptera: Perlidae) and Phylogenetic Position of Plecoptera Based on Mitogenomes Qian Yu-Han1,2, Wu Hai-Yan1, Ji Xiao-Yu1, Yu Wei-Wei1, Du Yu-Zhou1* 1 School of Horticulture and Plant Protection and Institute of Applied Entomology, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, Jiangsu, China, 2 College of Forestry, Southwest Forestry University, Kunming, Yunnan, China Abstract This study determined the mitochondrial genome sequence of the stonefly, Kamimuria wangi. In order to investigate the relatedness of stonefly to other members of Neoptera, a phylogenetic analysis was undertaken based on 13 protein-coding genes of mitochondrial genomes in 13 representative insects. The mitochondrial genome of the stonefly is a circular molecule consisting of 16,179 nucleotides and contains the 37 genes typically found in other insects. A 10-bp poly-T stretch was observed in the A+T-rich region of the K. wangi mitochondrial genome. Downstream of the poly-T stretch, two regions were located with potential ability to form stem-loop structures; these were designated stem-loop 1 (positions 15848– 15651) and stem-loop 2 (15965–15998). The arrangement of genes and nucleotide composition of the K. wangi mitogenome are similar to those in Pteronarcys princeps, suggesting a conserved genome evolution within the Plecoptera. Phylogenetic analysis using maximum likelihood and Bayesian inference of 13 protein-coding genes supported a novel relationship between the Plecoptera and Ephemeroptera. The results contradict the existence of a monophyletic Plectoptera and Plecoptera as sister taxa to Embiidina, and thus requires further analyses with additional mitogenome sampling at the base of the Neoptera.
    [Show full text]
  • The 2014 Golden Gate National Parks Bioblitz - Data Management and the Event Species List Achieving a Quality Dataset from a Large Scale Event
    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Natural Resource Stewardship and Science The 2014 Golden Gate National Parks BioBlitz - Data Management and the Event Species List Achieving a Quality Dataset from a Large Scale Event Natural Resource Report NPS/GOGA/NRR—2016/1147 ON THIS PAGE Photograph of BioBlitz participants conducting data entry into iNaturalist. Photograph courtesy of the National Park Service. ON THE COVER Photograph of BioBlitz participants collecting aquatic species data in the Presidio of San Francisco. Photograph courtesy of National Park Service. The 2014 Golden Gate National Parks BioBlitz - Data Management and the Event Species List Achieving a Quality Dataset from a Large Scale Event Natural Resource Report NPS/GOGA/NRR—2016/1147 Elizabeth Edson1, Michelle O’Herron1, Alison Forrestel2, Daniel George3 1Golden Gate Parks Conservancy Building 201 Fort Mason San Francisco, CA 94129 2National Park Service. Golden Gate National Recreation Area Fort Cronkhite, Bldg. 1061 Sausalito, CA 94965 3National Park Service. San Francisco Bay Area Network Inventory & Monitoring Program Manager Fort Cronkhite, Bldg. 1063 Sausalito, CA 94965 March 2016 U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service Natural Resource Stewardship and Science Fort Collins, Colorado The National Park Service, Natural Resource Stewardship and Science office in Fort Collins, Colorado, publishes a range of reports that address natural resource topics. These reports are of interest and applicability to a broad audience in the National Park Service and others in natural resource management, including scientists, conservation and environmental constituencies, and the public. The Natural Resource Report Series is used to disseminate comprehensive information and analysis about natural resources and related topics concerning lands managed by the National Park Service.
    [Show full text]
  • Download .PDF(1340
    Stark, Bill P. and Stephen Green. 2011. Eggs of western Nearctic Acroneuriinae (Plecoptera: Perlidae). Illiesia, 7(17):157-166. Available online: http://www2.pms-lj.si/illiesia/Illiesia07-17.pdf EGGS OF WESTERN NEARCTIC ACRONEURIINAE (PLECOPTERA: PERLIDAE) Bill P. Stark1 and Stephen Green2 1,2 Box 4045, Department of Biology, Mississippi College, Clinton, Mississippi, U.S.A. 39058 1 E-mail: [email protected] 2 E-mail: [email protected] ABSTRACT Eggs for western Nearctic acroneuriine species of Calineuria Ricker, Doroneuria Needham & Claassen and Hesperoperla Banks are examined and redescribed based on scanning electron microscopy images taken from specimens collected from a substantial portion of each species range. Within genera, species differences in egg morphology are small and not always useful for species recognition, however eggs from one population of Calineuria are significantly different from those found in other populations and this population is given informal recognition as a possible new species. Keywords: Plecoptera, Calineuria, Doroneuria, Hesperoperla, Egg morphology, Western Nearctic INTRODUCTION occur in the region (Baumann & Olson 1984; Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) is often used Kondratieff & Baumann 2002; Stark 1989; Stark & to elucidate chorionic features for stoneflies (e.g. Gaufin 1976; Stark & Kondratieff 2004; Zuellig et al. Baumann 1973; Grubbs 2005; Isobe 1988; Kondratieff 2006). SEM images for eggs of the primary western 2004; Kondratieff & Kirchner 1996; Nelson 2000; acroneuriine genera, Calineuria Ricker, Doroneuria Sivec & Stark 2002; 2008; Stark & Nelson 1994; Stark Needham & Claassen and Hesperoperla Banks include & Szczytko 1982; 1988; Szczytko & Stewart 1979) and single images for each of these genera in Stark & Nearctic Perlidae were among the earliest stoneflies Gaufin (1976), three images of Hesperoperla hoguei to be studied with this technique (Stark & Gaufin Baumann & Stark (1980) and three images of H.
    [Show full text]
  • List of Animal Species with Ranks October 2017
    Washington Natural Heritage Program List of Animal Species with Ranks October 2017 The following list of animals known from Washington is complete for resident and transient vertebrates and several groups of invertebrates, including odonates, branchipods, tiger beetles, butterflies, gastropods, freshwater bivalves and bumble bees. Some species from other groups are included, especially where there are conservation concerns. Among these are the Palouse giant earthworm, a few moths and some of our mayflies and grasshoppers. Currently 857 vertebrate and 1,100 invertebrate taxa are included. Conservation status, in the form of range-wide, national and state ranks are assigned to each taxon. Information on species range and distribution, number of individuals, population trends and threats is collected into a ranking form, analyzed, and used to assign ranks. Ranks are updated periodically, as new information is collected. We welcome new information for any species on our list. Common Name Scientific Name Class Global Rank State Rank State Status Federal Status Northwestern Salamander Ambystoma gracile Amphibia G5 S5 Long-toed Salamander Ambystoma macrodactylum Amphibia G5 S5 Tiger Salamander Ambystoma tigrinum Amphibia G5 S3 Ensatina Ensatina eschscholtzii Amphibia G5 S5 Dunn's Salamander Plethodon dunni Amphibia G4 S3 C Larch Mountain Salamander Plethodon larselli Amphibia G3 S3 S Van Dyke's Salamander Plethodon vandykei Amphibia G3 S3 C Western Red-backed Salamander Plethodon vehiculum Amphibia G5 S5 Rough-skinned Newt Taricha granulosa
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogeographic and Nested Clade Analysis of the Stonefly Pteronarcys
    J. N. Am. Benthol. Soc., 2004, 23(4):824–838 q 2004 by The North American Benthological Society Phylogeographic and nested clade analysis of the stonefly Pteronarcys californica (Plecoptera:Pteronarcyidae) in the western USA JOHN S. K. KAUWE1 Department of Biology, Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri 63110 USA DENNIS K. SHIOZAWA2 Department of Integrative Biology, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah 84602 USA R. PAUL EVANS3 Department of Microbiology and Molecular Biology, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah 84602 USA Abstract. Long-distance dispersal by aquatic insects can be difficult to detect because direct mea- surement methods are expensive and inefficient. When dispersal results in gene flow, signs of that dispersal can be detected in the pattern of genetic variation within and between populations. Four hundred seventy-five base pairs of the mitochondrial gene, cytochrome b, were examined to inves- tigate the pattern of genetic variation in populations of the stonefly Pteronarcys californica and to determine if long-distance dispersal could have contributed to this pattern. Sequences were obtained from 235 individuals from 31 different populations in the western United States. Sequences also were obtained for Pteronarcella badia, Pteronarcys dorsata, Pteronarcys princeps, Pteronarcys proteus, and Pter- onarcys biloba. Phylogenies were constructed using all of the samples. Nested clade analysis on the P. californica sequence data was used to infer the processes that have generated the observed patterns of genetic variation. An eastern North American origin and 2 distinct genetic lineages of P.californica could be inferred from the analysis. Most of the current population structure in both lineages was explained by a pattern of restricted gene flow with isolation by distance (presumably the result of dispersal via connected streams and rivers), but our analyses also suggested that long-distance, over- land dispersal has contributed to the observed pattern of genetic variation.
    [Show full text]
  • Thesis the Assimti...Ation and Elwination of Cesium By
    THESIS THE ASSIMTI...ATION AND ELWINATION OF CESIUM BY FRESHWATER INVERTEBRATES Submitted by Tracy M. Tostowaryk Graduate Degree Program in Ecology In partial fulfillment of the requirements For the Degree of Master of Science Colorado State University Fort Collins, Colorado Fall 2000 QL 3bS.3b'5" .lb11 :2.0DO COLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY November 6, 2000 WE HEREBY RECOMMEND THAT THE THESIS PREPARED UNDER OUR SUPERVISION BY TRACY M. TOSTOWARYK ENTITLED "THE ASSIMILATION AND ELIMINATION OF CESIUM BY FRESHWATER INVERTEBRATES" BE ACCEPTED AS FULFILLING IN PART REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF SCIENCE. Adviser Co-Adviser ii COLORADO STATE UNIV. LIBRARIES ABSTRACT OF THESIS THE ASSIMILATION AND ELIMINATION OF CESIUM BY FRESHWATER INVERTEBRATES Freshwater invertebrates are important vectors of radioactive cesium e34Cs and 137CS) in aquatic food webs, yet little is known about their cesium :uptake and loss kinetics. This study provides a detailed investigation of cesium assimilation and elimination by freshwater invertebrates. Using five common freshwater invertebrates (Gammarus lacustris, Anisoptera sp. nymphs, Claassenia sabulosa and Megarcys signata nymphs, and Orconetes sp.), a variety of food types (oligochaete worms, mayfly nymphs and algae) and six temperature treatments (3.5 to 30°C), the following hypotheses were tested: 1) cesium elimination rates are a positive function of water temperature; 2) cesium elimination rates increase with decreasing body size; 3) assimilation efficiencies range between 0.6 and 0.8 for diet items low in clay. Cesium loss exhibited first order, non-linear kinetics, best described by a two component exponential model. Cesium assimilation efficiencies were higher for invertebrates fed oligochaetes (0.77) and algae (0.80) than those fed mayfly nymphs (0.20).
    [Show full text]
  • The Effects of Electricity on Some Aquatic Invertebrates
    The effects of electricity on some aquatic invertebrates Item Type text; Thesis-Reproduction (electronic) Authors Mesick, Carl Frederick Publisher The University of Arizona. Rights Copyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction or presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author. Download date 26/09/2021 21:59:29 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/558075 THE EFFECTS OF ELECTRICITY ON SOME AQUATIC INVERTEBRATES by Carl Frederick Mesick A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of the SCHOOL OF RENEWABLE NATURAL RESOURCES In Partial Fulfillment of Requirements For the Degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE WITH A MAJOR IN FISHERIES SCIENCE In the Graduate College THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA 1 9 7 9 STATEMENT BY AUTHOR This thesis has been submitted in partial fulfill­ ment of requirements for an advanced degree at The University of Arizona and is deposited in the University Library to be made available to borrowers under rules of the Libraryo Brief quotations from this thesis are allowable without special permission, provided that accurate acknowl­ edgment of source is made. Requests for permission for extended quotation from or reproduction of this manuscript in whole or in part may be granted by the head of the major department or the Dean of the Graduate College when in his judgment the proposed use of the material is in the inter­ ests of scholarship. In all other instances, however, permission must be obtained from the author, SIGNED i ' ^ V[ APPROVAL BY THESIS DIRECTOR This thesis has been approved on the date shown below: JERRY C .
    [Show full text]
  • Aquatic Insect Ecophysiological Traits Reveal Phylogenetically Based Differences in Dissolved Cadmium Susceptibility
    Aquatic insect ecophysiological traits reveal phylogenetically based differences in dissolved cadmium susceptibility David B. Buchwalter*†, Daniel J. Cain‡, Caitrin A. Martin*, Lingtian Xie*, Samuel N. Luoma‡, and Theodore Garland, Jr.§ *Department of Environmental and Molecular Toxicology, Campus Box 7633, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27604; ‡Water Resources Division, U.S. Geological Survey, 345 Middlefield Road, MS 465, Menlo Park, CA 94025; and §Department of Biology, University of California, Riverside, CA 92521 Edited by George N. Somero, Stanford University, Pacific Grove, CA, and approved April 28, 2008 (received for review February 20, 2008) We used a phylogenetically based comparative approach to evaluate ecosystems today (e.g., trace metals) (6). This variation in the potential for physiological studies to reveal patterns of diversity susceptibility has practical implications, because the ecological in traits related to susceptibility to an environmental stressor, the structure of aquatic insect communities is often used to indicate trace metal cadmium (Cd). Physiological traits related to Cd bioaccu- the ecological conditions in freshwater systems (7–9). Differ- mulation, compartmentalization, and ultimately susceptibility were ences among species’ responses to environmental stressors can measured in 21 aquatic insect species representing the orders be profound, but it is uncertain whether the cause is related to Ephemeroptera, Plecoptera, and Trichoptera. We mapped these ex- functional ecology [usually the assumption (10, 11)] or physio- perimentally derived physiological traits onto a phylogeny and quan- logical traits (5, 12–14), which have received considerably less tified the tendency for related species to be similar (phylogenetic attention. To the degree that either is involved, their link to signal).
    [Show full text]
  • Dna Barcodes, Partitioned Phylogenetic Models, And
    LARGE DATASETS AND TRICHOPTERA PHYLOGENETICS: DNA BARCODES, PARTITIONED PHYLOGENETIC MODELS, AND THE EVOLUTION OF PHRYGANEIDAE By PAUL BRYAN FRANDSEN A dissertation submitted to the Graduate School-New Brunswick Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey In partial fulfillment of the requirements For the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Graduate Program in Entomology Written under the direction of Karl M. Kjer And approved by _____________________________________ _____________________________________ _____________________________________ _____________________________________ New Brunswick, New Jersey OCTOBER 2015 ABSTRACT OF THE DISSERTATION Large datasets and Trichoptera phylogenetics: DNA barcodes, partitioned phylogenetic models, and the evolution of Phryganeidae By PAUL BRYAN FRANDSEN Dissertation Director: Karl M. Kjer Large datasets in phylogenetics—those with a large number of taxa, e.g. DNA barcode data sets, and those with a large amount of sequence data per taxon, e.g. data sets generated from high throughput sequencing—pose both exciting possibilities and interesting analytical problems. The analysis of both types of large datasets is explored in this dissertation. First, the use of DNA barcodes in phylogenetics is investigated via the generation of phylogenetic trees for known monophyletic clades. Barcodes are found to be useful in shallow scale phylogenetic analyses when given a well-supported scaffold on which to place them. One of the analytical challenges posed by large phylogenetic datasets is the selection of appropriate partitioned models of molecular evolution. The most commonly used model partitioning strategies can fail to characterize the true variation of the evolutionary process and this effect can be exacerbated when applied to large datasets. A new, scalable algorithm for the automatic selection ! ii! of partitioned models of molecular evolution is proposed with an eye toward reducing systematic error in phylogenomics.
    [Show full text]
  • Water Resources Data Minnesota Water Year 1982
    Water Resources Data Minnesota Water Year 1982 Volume 2. Upper Mississippi and Missouri River Basins Volume 1. Great Lakes and Souris-Red-Rainy River Basins U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY WATER-DATA REPORT MN-82-2 Prepared in cooperation with the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, Division of Waters; the Minnesota Department of Transportation; and with other State, municipal, and Federal agencies CALENDAR FOR WATER YEAR 1982 1981 OCTOBER NOVEMBER DECEMBER S M T W T F S S M T W T F S S M T W T F S 123 1234567 12345 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 29 30 27 28 29 30 31 1982 JANUARY FEBRUARY MARCH S M T W T F S S M T W T F S S M T W T F S 1 2 123456 123456 3456789 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 28 28 29 30 31 31 APRIL MAY JUNE S M T W T F S S M T W T F S S M T W T F S 1 2 3 1 12345 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 2345678 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 25 26 27 28 29 30 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 27 28 29 30 30 31 JULY AUGUST SEPTEMBER S M T W T F S S M T W T F S S M T W T F S 1 2 3 1234567 1234 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 29 30 31 26 27 28 29 30 Water Resources Data Minnesota Water Year 1982 Volume 2.
    [Show full text]
  • A Comparison of Aquatic Invertebrate Assemblages Collected from the Green River in Dinosaur National Monument in 1962 and 2001
    A Comparison of Aquatic Invertebrate Assemblages Collected from the Green River in Dinosaur National Monument in 1962 and 2001 Final Report for United States Department of the Interior National Park Service Dinosaur National Monument 4545 East Highway 40 Dinosaur, Colorado 81610-9724 Report Prepared by: Dr. Mark Vinson, Ph.D. & Ms. Erin Thompson National Aquatic Monitoring Center Department o f Fisheries and Wildlife Utah State University Logan, Utah 84322-5210 www.usu.edu/buglab 22 January 2002 i Foreword The work described in this report was conducted by personnel of the National Aquatic Monitoring Center, Utah State University, Logan, Utah. Mr. J. Matt Tagg aided in the identification of the aquatic invertebrates. Ms. Leslie Ogden provided computer assistance. Several people at Dinosaur National Monument helped us immensely with various project details. Steve Petersburg, Dana Dilsaver, and Dennis Ditmanson provided us with our research permit. Ann Elder helped with sample archiving. Christy Wright scheduled our trip and provided us with our river permit. We thank them all for all their help and good spirit. We also thank Mr. Walter Kittams (National Park Service, Regional Office, Omaha Nebraska) and Mr. Earl M. Semingsen (Superintendent, Dinosaur National Monument) for funding the study and the members of the 1962 University of Utah expedition: Dr. Angus M. Woodbury, Dr. Stephen Durrant, Mr. Delbert Argyle, Mr. Douglas Anderson, and Dr. Seville Flowers for their foresight to conduct the original study nearly 40 years ago. The concept and value of long-term ecological data is often bantered about, but its value is never more apparent then when we conduct studies like that presented here.
    [Show full text]
  • 2002 Benthic Sites with Data Types Available for Each Site
    APPENDIX A 2002 Benthic Sites with Data Types Available for Each Site 04-1422-022.1 King County 2002 Benthic Macroinvertebrate Data Analyses FINAL August 2004 A-1 APPENDIX A - 2002 Benthic Sites with Data Types Available for Each Site Land WQ Hydrology Benthic Use Habitat Station WQ Station Hydrology Watershed Site Code Site Name Data Data Data Code Data Code Data Green-Duwamish 09BLA0675 Black 0675 x x x Green-Duwamish 09BLA0716 Black 0716 x x x Green-Duwamish 09BLA0722 Black 0722 x x x A326 x Green-Duwamish 09BLA0756 Black 0756 x x x Green-Duwamish 09BLA0768 Black 0768 x x x 03B x Green-Duwamish 09BLA0768 Black 0768 Replicate x x x 03B x Green-Duwamish 09BLA0771 Black 0771 x x x Green-Duwamish 09BLA0772 Black 0772 x x x Green-Duwamish 09BLA0813 Black 0813 x x x Green-Duwamish 09BLA0817 Black 0817 x x x Green-Duwamish 09BLA0817 Black 0817 Replicate x x x Green-Duwamish 09COV1165 Covington Basin 1165 x x x Green-Duwamish 09COV1418 Covington Basin 1418 x x x C320 x Green-Duwamish 09COV1753 Covington Basin 1753 x x x Green-Duwamish 09COV1798 Covington Basin 1798 x x x Green-Duwamish 09COV1862 Covington Basin 1862 x x x Green-Duwamish 09COV1864 Covington Basin 1864 x x x Green-Duwamish Covington Basin Soos 03 x x Green-Duwamish 09DEE2163 Deep/Coal Basin 2163 x x x Green-Duwamish 09DEE2208 Deep/Coal Basin 2208 x x x Green-Duwamish 09DEE2211 Deep/Coal Basin 2211 x x x Green-Duwamish 09DEE2266 Deep/Coal Basin 2266 x x x Green-Duwamish 09DEE2294 Deep/Coal Basin 2294 x x x Green-Duwamish 09DEE2294 Deep/Coal Basin 2294 Replicate x x x Green-Duwamish
    [Show full text]