DOCSLIB.ORG

Bus Bus Lines Lines ‰‰1616 Inter-Urban Inter-Urban Bus Bus Lines Lines ‰‰33 Night Night Bus Bus Lines Lines

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Bus Bus Lines Lines ‰‰1616 Inter-Urban Inter-Urban Bus Bus Lines Lines ‰‰33 Night Night Bus Bus Lines Lines PRTPRTPlansPlans inin SwedishSwedish CitiesCities byby Göran Göran Tegnér; Tegnér; M.Sc.Econ, M.Sc.Econ, Senior Senior Advisor, Advisor, WSP WSP Sweden Sweden ContentsContents Many PRT studies & activities in Sweden Mega-study: 15 % higher modal share with PRT Recent PRT studies in Sweden: The Mälar Valley Stockholm Södertälje Uppsala (Boländerna) Conclusions ManyMany PRTPRT activitiesactivities Kiruna inin Sweden:Sweden: -- Feasibility Feasibility studies studies -- Research Research Projects Projects -- Engineering Engineering study study in in Södertälje Södertälje Umeå - Test Tracks in Uppsala & Hofors - Test Tracks in Uppsala & Hofors Åre/Östersund Hofors Gävle Uppsala ManyMany activeactive forcesforces promotingpromoting Stockholm, Huddinge, Värmdö & Södertälje PRTPRT inin Sweden:Sweden: Eskilstuna & Linköping 44 Governmental Governmental bodies bodies Göteborg Jönköping 44 driving driving consultants consultants KOMPASSKOMPASS 44 Suppliers: Suppliers: Malmö HardwareHardware & & software software providers providers AA Meta-study:Meta-study: 1515 %-units%-units higherhigher modalmodal shareshare withwith PRTPRT Transit mode share with PRT - as a function of mode share without PRT (relationship based on 10 case studies with demand models) 80% 70% Central Gothenburg Daventry 60% Stockholm 2010 50% Skärholmen- Kungens kurva 2010 Central Gothenburg; 40% work trips 30% Corby New Town Modal split with PRT = 20% Modal split WITH PRT split Modal WITH 0.86* Modal split without PRT 10% + 17,5 % Södertälje 2 Cardiff Bay R = 0,91 0% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% Modal split WITHOUT PRT SomeSome recentrecent PRTPRT studiesstudies inin SwedenSweden A high-speed PRT inter-urban network for the Mälar Valley City of Stockholm City of Uppsala City of Södertälje TheThe MälarMälar Valley Valley Inter-urbanInter-urban high-speedhigh-speed PRTPRT networknetwork LinkingLinking local local networks, networks, 470 470 km km double double track, track, 200 200 km/hour km/hour Uppsala Stockholm Eskilstuna Södertälje TheThe MälarMälar Valley Valley highhigh speedspeed PRTPRT networknetwork Major findings about PRT: Facilitates commuting Substantial travel time gains Social benefit-cost ratio:1.35 Promotes CO2-goals Promotes traffic safety Promotes efficient land use TheThe StockholmStockholm PRTPRT system,system, byby SIKASIKA LinkingLinking urban urban nodes,nodes, 160160 kmkm track,track, 7575 km/hourkm/hour TheThe StockholmStockholm PRTPRT highhigh speedspeed networknetwork Purpose: Examine social Costs & Benefits Scenarios: Commuter rail link + Road Pricing+ PRT net Results: Direct traffic impacts: Shorter travel times Shift from cars to podcars & commuter train 35 % less passenger car traffic in the morning rush hour Benefit-Cost Ratio: 0.97 to 1.21 More detailed analysis is required Technology available, but needs development TheThe CityCity ofof SödertäljeSödertälje <=<= Today’s Today’s Publ. Publ. Trp. Trp. inin Södertälje:Södertälje: 44 railways railways stations stations 22 commuter commuter rail rail lines lines 1313 urban urban bus bus lines lines 1616 inter-urban inter-urban bus bus lines lines 33 night night bus bus lines lines 162162 line-kms line-kms 1414 % % publ-trp-modal publ-trp-modal share share 88 % % modal modal share share locally locally 2525 000 000 daily daily trips trips PRTPRT feasibilityfeasibility studystudy forfor SödertäljeSödertälje PRT-network:PRT-network: ••4343 km km track track ••5555 stations stations ••700700 vehicles vehicles ••0-10-1 min min wait wait time time ••4545 km/hour km/hour speed speed Impacts:Impacts: ••Publ.Trp.modalPubl.Trp.modal share:share: withoutwithout PRT: PRT: 8 8 % % withwith PRT: PRT: 19% 19% ToTo the the year year 2030: 2030: FromFrom 25 25 000 000 to to 6767 500 500 daily daily publ.trp.publ.trp. tripstrips by by PRT PRT AnAn engineeringengineering PRTPRT studystudy forfor SödertäljeSödertälje PTR for Södertälje – a vision for a sustainable city traffic – technique, design and costs Made in 2008-09 by WSP Civils & LogistikCentrum 4 phases examined DesignDesign ofof PRTPRT inin SödertäljeSödertälje AA typicaltypical PRTPRT stationstation AA PRTPRT stationstation onon toptop ofof aa railwayrailway stationstation SödertäljeSödertälje BOT BOT financing:financing: PRTPRT cheapercheaper thanthan bus:bus: CapitalCapital cost:cost: 6.66.6 m€m€ per per km;km; totaltotal cost:cost: 289289 m€-43m€-43 km:km: CostCost perper trip:trip: Bus:Bus: 1.641.64 €:€: PRT:PRT: 0.820.82 €€ Södertälje annual costs & ticket revenue in M€ -7 Operating cost -22 -22 Capital cost: -3 PRT 12,5 Ticket revenue: Bus 7 -16,5 Net cost: -18 -25 -20 -15 -10 -5 0 5 10 15 PRTPRT FeasibilityFeasibility study studyPRT for for for Boländerna,Boländerna, Uppsala UppsalaUppsala Railway AA PRTPRT NetworkNetwork forfor BoländernaBoländerna station 9.49.4 kmkm single-track,single-track, 1616 stations,stations, 130130 vehiclesvehicles Shopping Mall Area OnlyOnly 5 5 %% BusBus tripstrips inin UppsalaUppsala todaytoday Modal split at Boländerna in Uppsala today Walk/Bike 30% Bus Car 5% 65% 2020 %% (four(four timestimes higher)higher) modalmodal splitsplit atat BoländernaBoländerna inin UppsalaUppsala withwith PRTPRT Modal split at Boländerna in Uppsala in 2020 with PRT Walk/Bike 25% Car 55% PRT 20% ConclusionsConclusions forfor UppsalaUppsala Modal share up from 5 % to 20 % From 4 200 (by bus) to 16 000 daily trips (by PRT) BOT financing proposed Cost per trip: Bus: 1.80 €, PRT: 1.30 € Benefit-Cost ratio: 1.1 to 2.1. Average: 1.4 Forthcoming decision making: At present on public consideration A new study will compare bus, LRT and PRT for the entire city of Uppsala Conclusions:Conclusions: PRTPRT PlansPlans inin SwedishSwedish Cites:Cites: 1. Many feasibility Studies 2. Several activities promoting PRT 3. Still: no political decision, yet, but: A new governmental task to examine implementation of PRT in cities 4. Mega study shows: modal share up by 15 %- units on average with PRT 5. BOT-Build-Operate & Transfer financing proposed 6. Social benefits often higher than costs 7. Two comparative studies (Bus, LRT & PRT) going on, one for Uppsala, one more general.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Urban Mobility and Sustainable Urban Transport Index
    Urban Mobility and Sustainable Urban Transport Index Islamic Republic of Iran Tehran Sustainable Transport Indicators(SUTI) October 2019 The Metropolis of Tehran Tehran Sustainable Transportation Indicators(SUTI) Tehran characteristics Population (million) 9 Area (km²) 750 southern slopes Location of Alborz mountains Average slope from north to 4.5% south Tehran Sustainable Transportation Indicators(SUTI) Tehran characteristics Municipal districts 22 12,100 District 10 Most density District 22 Least density Tehran Transportation Tehran Sustainable Transportation Indicators(SUTI) Tehran Road Network (km) Highways, freeways and 931 ramps & loops Major streets (primary & 1,053 secondary arterials) local streets 1,552 Tehran Sustainable Transportation Indicators(SUTI) Tehran's Restricted Traffic Zones Central restricted • Free for public vehicles zone (32 km²) • Charges for private cars • Free for public vehicles • Free for 20 days of each low emission zone- season for private cars LEZ (89 km²) • Charges for private cars, more than 20 days Tehran Sustainable Transportation Indicators(SUTI) Public Transport Bus system Subway Bus : 220 Lines 6 BRT : 10 Length(km) 3,000 215 Public sector: 1,348 Wagons: 1343 Fleet Private sector: 4,800 Trains: 183 Bus : 4,785 109 Stations BRT : 347 Tehran Sustainable Transportation Indicators(SUTI) Paratransit Types Fleet Rotary taxi 34,000 Fixed- route taxi 16,000 Private Taxi 28,000 Internet taxi NA Tehran Sustainable Transportation Indicators(SUTI) Active Transport Cycling Walking •Bike House: Facilities 153
    [Show full text]
  • D2.2: Current State of Urban Mobility
    Project ID: 814910 LC-MG-1-3-2018 - Harnessing and understanding the impacts of changes in urban mobility on policy making by city-led innovation for sustainable urban mobility Sustainable Policy RespOnse to Urban mobility Transition D2.2: Current state of urban mobility Work package: WP 2 - Understanding transition in urban mobility Geert te Boveldt, Imre Keseru, Sara Tori, Cathy Macharis, Authors: (VUB), Beatriz Royo, Teresa de la Cruz (ZLC) City of Almada, City of Arad, BKK Centre for Budapest Transport, City of Gothenburg, City of ‘s Hertogenbosch, City of Ioannina, City of Mechelen, City of Minneapolis, Contributors: City of Padova, City of Tel Aviv, City of Valencia, Region of Ile-de-France, Municipality of Kalisz, West Midlands Combined Authority, Aristos Halatsis (CERTH) Status: Final version Date: Jan 30, 2020 Version: 1.0 Classification: PU - public Disclaimer: The SPROUT project is co-funded by the European Commission under the Horizon 2020 Framework Programme. This document reflects only authors’ views. EC is not liable for any use that may be done of the information contained therein. D2.2: Current state of urban mobility SPROUT Project Profile Project ID: 814910; H2020- LC-MG-1-3-2018 Acronym: SPROUT Title: Sustainable Policy RespOnse to Urban mobility Transition URL: Start Date: 01/09/2019 Duration: 36 Months 3 D2.2: Current state of urban mobility Table of Contents 1 Executive Summary ......................................................................... 10 2 Introduction .....................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Impact on Transit Patronage of Cessation Or Inauguration of Rail Service
    TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH RECORD 1221 59 Impact on Transit Patronage of Cessation or Inauguration of Rail Service EDSON L. TENNYSON ilar bus service to calibrate models accurately for suburban Many theorists believe that transit service mode has little influ­ ence on consumer choice between automobile and transit travel. transit use ( 4). Others believe that they have noted a modal effect in which Earlier, the Delaware Valley Regional Planning Commis­ rail transit attracts higher ridership than does bus when other sion found that regional models calibrated for 99 percent con­ factors are about equal. Given environmental concerns and fidence level grossly overstated local bus ridership and equally the large investment needed for guided transit, a better under­ understated commuter rail ridership to obtain correct regional standing of this issue is essential, especially for congested areas. totals (5). There is thus considerable anecdotal evidence that A consideration of the history of automobile and transit travel transit submode choice can make a substantial difference in in the United States can be helpful in comprehending the nature the actual attraction of motorists to transit, with widespread of the problem. After World War II, availability of vehicles, attendant benefits. fuel, and tires spurred growth of both private automobile use It is true that travel time, fare, frequency of service, pop­ and use of buses for transit. Analyses of the effects of both this growth and the improvements in rail systems that were added ulation, density, and distance are all prime determinants of during the same period reveal that transit mode does indeed travel and transit use, but automobile ownership and personal make a significant difference in the level of use of a transit income may not be consistent factors for estimating rail transit facility.
    [Show full text]
  • Sustainable Transportation Blue Dot Municipal Toolkit Building a Low-Carbon Future Blue Dot Municipal Toolkit
    Guide 9 Sustainable transportation Blue Dot Municipal Toolkit Building a Low-Carbon Future Blue Dot Municipal Toolkit People in Canada take pride in this country’s natural landscapes, rich ecosystems and wildlife. But Canada’s Constitution doesn’t mention environmental rights and responsibilities. Municipalities across the country are recognizing and supporting their residents’ right to a healthy environment. By adopting the Blue Dot declaration, more than 150 municipal governments now support the right to clean air and water, safe food, a stable climate and a say in decisions that affect our health and well-being. For some municipalities, adopting the Blue Dot declaration is a clear statement about environmental initiatives already underway. For others, it’s a significant first step. Either way, after passing a declaration, many ask “What happens next?” This toolkit provides practical ideas for next steps. Its introduction and 13 downloadable guides cover topics related to human health, green communities and a low-carbon future. Written for policy-makers, each guide shares examples of policies and projects undertaken in communities in Canada and around the world. The goal is to inform, inspire and share good ideas and great practices that will lead to healthier, more sustainable communities now and in the future. The following guides are available: Introduction to the Blue Dot Municipal Toolkit Protecting Human Health Guide 1: Air quality Guide 2: Clean water Guide 3: Non-toxic environment Guide 4: Healthy food Creating Green Communities Guide 5: Access to green space Guide 6: Protecting and restoring biodiversity Guide 7: Zero waste Building a Low Carbon Future Guide 8: Transitioning to 100% renewable energy Guide 9: Green buildings Guide 10: Sustainable transportation Guide 11: Green economy Guide 12: Climate change adaptation Guide 13: Ecological footprint and land use planning To read more about municipal actions for environmental rights, and to access all the Blue Dot toolkit guides, visit www.____.org.
    [Show full text]
  • Transportation of U.S. Grains Modal Share 1978-2016 Update
    1 Agricultural Marketing Service Updated April 2019 Transportation of U.S. Grains A Modal Share Analysis 1978-2016 Update 1 Preferred Citation Chang, Kuo-Liang “Matt”, Peter Caffarelli, Jesse Gastelle, and Adam Sparger. Transportation of U.S. Grains: A Modal Share Analysis, April 2019. U.S. Dept. of Agriculture, Agricultural Marketing Service. Web. <http://dx.doi.org/10.9752/TS049.04-2019> Photo credits: USDA USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer, and lender. Transportation of U.S. Grains A Modal Share Analysis 1978-2016 Update USDA Economists Kuo-Liang “Matt” Chang Peter Caffarelli Jesse Gastelle Adam Sparger Transportation Services Division USDA Agricultural Marketing Service i Abstract This report provides a breakout by mode of corn, wheat, soybeans, sorghum, and barley movements to either domestic markets or U.S. ports for export between 1978 and 2016. It is the eleventh update of an initial modal share study completed in 1992. The purpose of this series of reports is to provide the latest information about changes and trends in the relative competitiveness and efficiency among the different transportation modes in moving grain. Estimates of the tonnages (and shares) of grain railed, barged, and trucked are developed from a variety of secondary sources. This data can be used to identify trends and implications on transportation from factors, such as changes in production volumes and commodity mix, as well as changes in the relative demand for U.S. grain for domestic purposes versus export. ii Contents Abstract .......................................................................................................................ii
    [Show full text]
  • Madrid Public Transport System Metro & Regional Railways
    MADRID PUBLIC TRANSPORT SYSTEM METRO & REGIONAL RAILWAYS 3rd International Seminar on Mega city: « Urban Mobility options» Mumbai, Nov ember 2014 - Presentation • INECO is a state owned company established in 1968 • The trusted consultancy to the Spanish Transport and Public Works Ministry • Independent from manufacturers/suppliers interest • World class railway engineering and consultancy company 2 - shhldhareholders INECO is a company integrated in the Ministry of PublicWorks and Transport. Its shareholders are the public companies for the complex management of Spain´s transport systems. ADIF Administrador de Infraestructuras Ferroviarias (Administrator of Railway Infraestructures) RENFE Red Nacional de Ferrocarriles Españoles (Spanish National railway) AENA Aeropuertos Españoles y Navegación Aérea (Spanish airports and airspace) Shareholders 3 - Presentation Turnover approx. Staff: 2800 300 Million EUROS employees 40 years, 55 countries , leading + 1,000 railwa y transport projects Staff: over 3,100 2,000 staff working in railway consultancy including LRTs, metros, commuter trains, freight railways and high speed railways) 4 - capabilities A global services offer. Fro m planning & design to operation Highly specialized in railways (Metro, Light Rail, Commuter, Regional and High Speed) PROJECT MANAGEMENT DESIGN • Control, supervision and technical • Conceptual and preliminary design assistance • Performance specifications • Construction Management and technical • Detailed Design advisory OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE PLANNING • Commissioning,
    [Show full text]
  • LONG-TERM TRENDS in MODAL SHARE for URBAN PASSENGER TRAVEL David Cosgrove and David Gargett Bureau of Transport and Regional
    LONG-TERM TRENDS IN MODAL SHARE FOR URBAN PASSENGER TRAVEL David Cosgrove and David Gargett Bureau of Transport and Regional Economics INTRODUCTION When considering the effects of competition on patronage levels for urban public transport, an awareness of past trends in those levels is typically of significant value. In fact, a sound knowledge of how urban transport patterns have varied over time can be crucial for properly assessing the likely scope for any change to the current modal shares of the various urban passenger tasks. At the Bureau of Transport and Regional Economics (BTRE), we have compiled datasets on a series of long-term trends in primary passenger tasks; not only at the national level, but also for each of the Australian capital cities. As an aid to discussions concerning either past effects of transport reforms (on passenger modal choice) or the possible extent of future patronage growth (for urban transit), this paper presents a summary of such modal trends, for each State and Territory capital city. The BTRE has recently conducted a study of the avoidable social costs of congestion in Australia (reported in Working Paper 71, Estimating Urban Traffic and Congestion Cost Trends for Australian Cities, BTRE 2007). Congestion imposes significant costs on society – with interruptions to urban traffic flow lengthening average journey times, making trip travel times more variable, and making vehicle engine operation less efficient. The latter leads not only to higher rates of fuel consumption, than would otherwise have occurred, but also to poorer urban air quality (with vehicles under congested conditions typically emitting far higher rates of noxious pollutants than under more freely flowing conditions, resulting in even higher health costs to the community).
    [Show full text]
  • Towards New Urban Mobility: the Case of London and Berlin
    Towards New Urban Mobility New Towards The case of London and Berlin case of London The Towards New Urban Mobility The case of London and Berlin LSE Cities and InnoZ, 2015 3 3 Research Directors Philipp Rode Executive Director of LSE Cities and Senior Research Fellow, London School of Economics and Political Science London School of Economics and Political Science Houghton Street Christian Hoffmann, Director of User Research, London Innovation Centre for Mobility and Societal Change WC2A 2AE (InnoZ) UK Research Team Tel: +44 (0)20 7955 7706 [email protected] Jens Kandt www.lsecities.net Lead Researcher, LSE Cities Duncan Smith Research Officer, LSE Cities Andreas Graff Researcher, InnoZ Innovation Centre for Mobility and Societal Change (InnoZ) GmbH Support and Advice Torgauer Strasse 12 - 15 Alexandra Gomes, LSE Cities 10829 Berlin Alun Humphrey, National Centre for Social Research Germany Ben Plowden, Transport for London Catarina Heeckt, LSE Cities Tel: +49 (0)30 238884-0 Colin Shepherd, Transport for London [email protected] Florian Lennert, InnoZ www.innoz.de Jillian Anable, University of Aberdeen Joe Stordy, Transport for London Supported by Imke Steinmeyer, Berlin Senate Department for Urban Development and the Environment Nihan Akyelken, University of Oxford Piotr Fryzlewicz, London School of Economics and Political Science Robert Vollmer, infas Institute for Applied Social Sciences Robin Hickman, University College London Samantha Kennedy, Transport for London Thorsten Brand, infas Institute for Applied Social Sciences Production and Graphic Design Peter Griffiths Managing Editor, LSE Cities Atelier Works www.atelierworks.co.uk This Report is intended as a basis for discussion. While every effort has been made to ensure the accuracy of the material in this report, the authors and/or LSE Cities will not be liable for any loss or damage incurred through the use of this report.
    [Show full text]
  • D2.1 SUMP Baseline Report
    Ref. Ares(2018)3823219 - 18/07/2018 D2.1 SUMP Baseline Report Deliverable No.: D2.1 Project Acronym: DESTINATIONS Full Title: CIVITAS DESTINATIONS Grant Agreement No.: 689031 Workpackage/Measure No.: WP2, M2.1 Workpackage/ Measure Title: WP2: Sustainable Urban Mobility Planning for residents and visitors Task 2.2: Mobility context analysis and baseline Responsible Author(s): Willem Buijs, Renske Martijnse, Teije Gorris (LuxMobility) Responsible Co-Author(s): Alexandra Ellul (TM), Ritianne Buhagiar (TM), André Freitas (HF), Claudio Mantero (HF), Carla Patrícia (SRETC), Cristina Loreto (SRETC), Antonio Artiles (Guaguas), Octavio Cantero (Municipality of Las Palmas de Gran Canaria); Francesca Pietroni (ISSINOVA), Riccardo Enei (ISSINOVA), Panayiotis Antoniades (Stratagem), Nicole Mavrovounioti (Stratagem), Thanos Vlastos, Efthimios Bakogiannis, Konstantinos Athanassopoulos, Maria Siti, Harry Kyriakidis (Sustainable Mobility Unit, National Technical University of Athens), Nikos Vovos, Vasilis Myriokefalitakis , Thomas Papadogiannis (Rethymno Municipality), Stavroula Tournaki, Eleni Farmaki (Technical University of Crete) Date: 10/07/2017 Status: Final Dissemination level: Public The views expressed in this publication are the sole responsibility of the authors and the DESTINATIONS project consortium and do not necessarily reflect the views of the European Commission. D2.1 – SUMP Baseline 07/2017 Document History Date Person Action Status Diss. Level LuxMobility, TM; Draft template to ISINNOVA and PM, WPL, 27/3/2017 Draft WP2 leader VECTOS
    [Show full text]
  • Felix Michel Till AFC Under 2021
    Pressmeddelande 2021-08-11 Felix Michel till AFC under 2021 AIK Fotboll är överens med Athletic FC Eskilstuna om ett lån av den libanesiske landslagsmannen Felix Michel. Lånet gäller från idag och fram till och med den 31 december 2021. – Prioriterat för oss båda har varit att finna en lösning där Felix får större möjlighet till kontinuerlig speltid. Det tror vi att Felix kan få i en miljö som han är väl bekant med sedan tidigare, säger herrlagets sportchef Henrik Jurelius. För en längre faktapresentation av Felix Michel, se det bifogade materialet i detta pressmeddelande. För mer information, kontakta: Henrik Jurelius, sportchef (herr) AIK Fotboll Mobil: 070 - 431 12 02 E-post: [email protected] Om AIK Fotboll AB AIK Fotboll AB bedriver AIK Fotbollsförenings elitfotbollsverksamhet genom ett herrlag, damlag samt ett juniorlag för herrar. 2021 spelar herrlaget i Allsvenskan, damlaget i OBOS Damallsvenskan och juniorlaget, som utgör en viktig rekryteringsgrund för framtida spelare, spelar i P19 Allsvenskan Norra. AIK Fotboll AB är noterat på NGM Nordic Growth Market Stockholm. För ytterligare information kring AIK Fotboll besök www.aikfotboll.se. Pressmeddelande 2021-08-11 Fakta Felix Michel 27-årige Felix Michel, född lördagen den 23 juli 1994 på Södertälje sjukhus, inledde som sjuåring sitt fotbolls- spelande i moderklubben Syrianska FC. Efter ungdoms- och juniorfotboll i Syrianska FC A-lagsdebuterade han 2013 för klubben och det blev spel i sex tävlingsmatcher under året. Felix spelade sammanlagt fyra säsonger med Syrianskas A-lag innan han i augusti 2016 skrev på ett avtal med den turkiska klubben Eskişehirspor som spelade i TFF First League, den näst högsta ligan i Turkiet.
    [Show full text]
  • National Data on Transport Modal Shares for 131 Countries
    Article How Do People Move Around? National Data on Transport Modal Shares for 131 Countries Grigorios Fountas 1, Ya-Yen Sun 2 , Ortzi Akizu-Gardoki 3 and Francesco Pomponi 4,* 1 Transport Research Institute (TRI), School of Engineering & the Built Environment, Edinburgh Napier University, Edinburgh EH10 5DT, UK; [email protected] 2 UQ Business School, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD 4072, Australia; [email protected] 3 Faculty of Engineering of Bilbao, University of the Basque Country, 48013 Bilbao, Spain; [email protected] 4 Resource Efficient Built Environment Lab (REBEL), Edinburgh Napier University, Edinburgh EH10 5DT, UK * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +44-(0)-13-1455-3590 Received: 19 May 2020; Accepted: 16 June 2020; Published: 18 June 2020 Abstract: The COVID-19 pandemic has brought global mobility into the spotlight, with well over 100 countries having instituted either a full or partial lockdown by April 2020. Reduced mobility, whilst causing social and economic impacts, can also be beneficial for the environment and future studies will surely quantify such environmental gains. However, accurate quantification is intimately linked to good quality data on transport modal shares, as passenger cars and public transport have significantly different emissions profiles. Herein, we compile a currently lacking dataset on global modal transport shares for 131 countries. Notably, these are the countries covered by the Google Community Mobility Reports (plus Russia and China for their global relevance), thus allowing for a smooth integration between our dataset and the rich information offered by the Google Community Mobility Reports, thus enabling analysis of global emissions reductions due to mobility restrictions.
    [Show full text]
  • Result Swedish Cup 2019
    2 Organizing committee Chairman Treasury manager Mikael Svensson Sven Johansson [email protected] [email protected] Secretary general Thomas Persson [email protected] Jury Jury of Appeal RTS Mikael Svensson Chairman Patrik Johansson Chariman Patrik Johansson A5313 Marko Leppä Jonas Edman Ingemar Proos Result Rifle Jan-Olof Olsson Chairman A4426 Georg-Peter Björkquist B4323 Thomas Persson B7131 Magnus Gustavsson B7129 Swedish Cup Pistol Marko Leppä Chairman A5211 Lars Carlsson A5310 Ingemar Proos A5309 Mikael Friman B7128 Equipment control rifle 2019 Magnus Gustavsson Chairman B7129 Ingemar Jonsson C044 Håkan Christensson C017 Equipment control pistol Patrik Johansson Chairman A5313 Anders Bäckman C188 Christer Claesson C126 3 4 Day 2 ...................................................................................................................................................... 34 Best Pistol Shooter ........................................................................................................................................... 7 Final Air Rifle Men .......................................................................................................................................... 34 Best Air Pistol Men ........................................................................................................................................... 8 Air Rifle Men ..................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]