D2.1 SUMP Baseline Report
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Ref. Ares(2018)3823219 - 18/07/2018 D2.1 SUMP Baseline Report Deliverable No.: D2.1 Project Acronym: DESTINATIONS Full Title: CIVITAS DESTINATIONS Grant Agreement No.: 689031 Workpackage/Measure No.: WP2, M2.1 Workpackage/ Measure Title: WP2: Sustainable Urban Mobility Planning for residents and visitors Task 2.2: Mobility context analysis and baseline Responsible Author(s): Willem Buijs, Renske Martijnse, Teije Gorris (LuxMobility) Responsible Co-Author(s): Alexandra Ellul (TM), Ritianne Buhagiar (TM), André Freitas (HF), Claudio Mantero (HF), Carla Patrícia (SRETC), Cristina Loreto (SRETC), Antonio Artiles (Guaguas), Octavio Cantero (Municipality of Las Palmas de Gran Canaria); Francesca Pietroni (ISSINOVA), Riccardo Enei (ISSINOVA), Panayiotis Antoniades (Stratagem), Nicole Mavrovounioti (Stratagem), Thanos Vlastos, Efthimios Bakogiannis, Konstantinos Athanassopoulos, Maria Siti, Harry Kyriakidis (Sustainable Mobility Unit, National Technical University of Athens), Nikos Vovos, Vasilis Myriokefalitakis , Thomas Papadogiannis (Rethymno Municipality), Stavroula Tournaki, Eleni Farmaki (Technical University of Crete) Date: 10/07/2017 Status: Final Dissemination level: Public The views expressed in this publication are the sole responsibility of the authors and the DESTINATIONS project consortium and do not necessarily reflect the views of the European Commission. D2.1 – SUMP Baseline 07/2017 Document History Date Person Action Status Diss. Level LuxMobility, TM; Draft template to ISINNOVA and PM, WPL, 27/3/2017 Draft WP2 leader VECTOS PEM SM and LuxMobility, TM; Consolidation of template and Final 30/3/2017 Measure WP2 leader release to partners template leaders LuxMobility, TM; Final draft version deliverable sent Final 31/5/2017 PC, PM, TC WP2 leader for peer review draft Final 15/6/2017 Horários do Funchal First peer-reviewing PC, PM, TC draft Second version deliverable (with LuxMobility TM; WP2 first peer-review comments Final 10/7/2017 PC, PM, TC leader integrated) sent for second peer draft review 18/7/2017 Vectos Second peer review Final PC, PM, TC Status: Draft, Final, Approved, and Submitted (to European Commission). Dissemination Level: PC = Project Coordinator, PM = Project Manager, SM=Site Manager, TC=Technical Coordinator, WPL= Workpackage Leader, PEM= Project Evaluation Manager, PDM= Project Dissemination Manager 2 D2.1 – SUMP Baseline 07/2017 Contents 1 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................... 12 1.1 OBJECTIVES OF DESTINATIONS PROJECT.............................................................................. 12 1.2 SUMP INNOVATION ................................................................................................................. 12 1.3 OBJECTIVES AND TARGET GROUP OF THIS REPORT .................................................................... 14 1.4 THE SIX MEASURES IN SHORT ................................................................................................... 15 1.5 REPORT OUTLINE ..................................................................................................................... 17 1.6 ANALYSIS ................................................................................................................................ 18 2 MADEIRA BASELINE ................................................................................................................... 23 2.1 GEOGRAPHICAL AREA .............................................................................................................. 23 2.1.1 Demography / census .................................................................................................................................. 24 2.2 ANALYSIS OF CURRENT MOBILITY SITUATION .............................................................................. 26 2.2.1 Traffic models .............................................................................................................................................. 26 2.2.2 Existing policy plans, regulations and models ............................................................................................. 26 2.2.3 Stakeholders and responsibilities ................................................................................................................ 27 2.2.4 Tourism ....................................................................................................................................................... 27 2.2.5 Main mobility challenges / problems in the SRMP region .......................................................................... 28 2.3 MEASURE INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................... 29 2.4 AIMS OF THE SUMP ................................................................................................................. 30 2.5 RELEVANT OTHER CIVITAS DESTINATIONS MEASURES IN SRMP AREA ................................. 30 2.6 SUMP DEVELOPMENT: DRIVERS, BARRIERS, RESOURCES AND PLANNING ................................... 31 2.7 SUMP SELF-ASSESSMENT QUESTIONNAIRE ANALYSIS ............................................................... 32 3 LIMASSOL (CYPRUS) BASELINE .............................................................................................. 34 3.1 GEOGRAPHICAL AREA .............................................................................................................. 34 3.1.1 Demography / census .................................................................................................................................. 36 3.2 ANALYSIS OF CURRENT MOBILITY SITUATION .............................................................................. 36 3.2.1 Models and data.......................................................................................................................................... 36 3.2.2 Existing policy plans and regulations ........................................................................................................... 37 3.2.3 Stakeholders and responsibilities ................................................................................................................ 37 3.2.4 Tourism ....................................................................................................................................................... 37 3.2.5 Main mobility challenges / problems in the SUMP/SRMP region ............................................................... 38 3.3 MEASURE INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................... 38 3.4 AIMS OF THE SUMP ................................................................................................................. 39 3.5 RELEVANT OTHER CIVITAS DESTINATIONS MEASURES IN SUMP/SRMP AREA ..................... 39 3 D2.1 – SUMP Baseline 07/2017 3.6 SUMP DEVELOPMENT: DRIVERS, BARRIERS, RESOURCES AND PLANNING ................................... 40 3.7 SUMP SELF-ASSESSMENT QUESTIONNAIRE ANALYSIS ............................................................... 40 4 LAS PALMAS (GRAN CANARIA) BASELINE ............................................................................ 42 4.1 GEOGRAPHICAL AREA .............................................................................................................. 42 4.1.1 Demography / census .................................................................................................................................. 47 4.2 ANALYSIS OF CURRENT MOBILITY SITUATION .............................................................................. 48 4.2.1 Models and data.......................................................................................................................................... 48 4.2.2 Existing policy plans and regulations ........................................................................................................... 50 4.2.3 Stakeholders and responsibilities ................................................................................................................ 51 4.2.4 Tourism ....................................................................................................................................................... 52 4.2.5 Main mobility challenges / problems in the SUMP/SRMP region ............................................................... 55 4.3 MEASURE INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................... 55 4.4 AIMS OF THE MOBILITY OFFICE ................................................................................................. 56 4.5 RELEVANT OTHER CIVITAS DESTINATIONS MEASURES IN SUMP/SRMP AREA ..................... 56 4.6 MOBILITY OFFICE DEVELOPMENT: DRIVERS, BARRIERS, RESOURCES AND PLANNING ................... 57 4.7 SUMP SELF-ASSESSMENT QUESTIONNAIRE ANALYSIS ............................................................... 57 5 VALLETTA (MALTA) BASELINE................................................................................................. 59 5.1 GEOGRAPHICAL AREA .............................................................................................................. 59 5.1.1 Demography / census .................................................................................................................................. 61 5.2 ANALYSIS OF CURRENT MOBILITY SITUATION .............................................................................