Bus Bus Lines Lines ‰‰1616 Inter-Urban Inter-Urban Bus Bus Lines Lines ‰‰33 Night Night Bus Bus Lines Lines

Bus Bus Lines Lines ‰‰1616 Inter-Urban Inter-Urban Bus Bus Lines Lines ‰‰33 Night Night Bus Bus Lines Lines

PRTPRTPlansPlans inin SwedishSwedish CitiesCities byby Göran Göran Tegnér; Tegnér; M.Sc.Econ, M.Sc.Econ, Senior Senior Advisor, Advisor, WSP WSP Sweden Sweden ContentsContents Many PRT studies & activities in Sweden Mega-study: 15 % higher modal share with PRT Recent PRT studies in Sweden: The Mälar Valley Stockholm Södertälje Uppsala (Boländerna) Conclusions ManyMany PRTPRT activitiesactivities Kiruna inin Sweden:Sweden: -- Feasibility Feasibility studies studies -- Research Research Projects Projects -- Engineering Engineering study study in in Södertälje Södertälje Umeå - Test Tracks in Uppsala & Hofors - Test Tracks in Uppsala & Hofors Åre/Östersund Hofors Gävle Uppsala ManyMany activeactive forcesforces promotingpromoting Stockholm, Huddinge, Värmdö & Södertälje PRTPRT inin Sweden:Sweden: Eskilstuna & Linköping 44 Governmental Governmental bodies bodies Göteborg Jönköping 44 driving driving consultants consultants KOMPASSKOMPASS 44 Suppliers: Suppliers: Malmö HardwareHardware & & software software providers providers AA Meta-study:Meta-study: 1515 %-units%-units higherhigher modalmodal shareshare withwith PRTPRT Transit mode share with PRT - as a function of mode share without PRT (relationship based on 10 case studies with demand models) 80% 70% Central Gothenburg Daventry 60% Stockholm 2010 50% Skärholmen- Kungens kurva 2010 Central Gothenburg; 40% work trips 30% Corby New Town Modal split with PRT = 20% Modal split WITH PRT split Modal WITH 0.86* Modal split without PRT 10% + 17,5 % Södertälje 2 Cardiff Bay R = 0,91 0% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% Modal split WITHOUT PRT SomeSome recentrecent PRTPRT studiesstudies inin SwedenSweden A high-speed PRT inter-urban network for the Mälar Valley City of Stockholm City of Uppsala City of Södertälje TheThe MälarMälar Valley Valley Inter-urbanInter-urban high-speedhigh-speed PRTPRT networknetwork LinkingLinking local local networks, networks, 470 470 km km double double track, track, 200 200 km/hour km/hour Uppsala Stockholm Eskilstuna Södertälje TheThe MälarMälar Valley Valley highhigh speedspeed PRTPRT networknetwork Major findings about PRT: Facilitates commuting Substantial travel time gains Social benefit-cost ratio:1.35 Promotes CO2-goals Promotes traffic safety Promotes efficient land use TheThe StockholmStockholm PRTPRT system,system, byby SIKASIKA LinkingLinking urban urban nodes,nodes, 160160 kmkm track,track, 7575 km/hourkm/hour TheThe StockholmStockholm PRTPRT highhigh speedspeed networknetwork Purpose: Examine social Costs & Benefits Scenarios: Commuter rail link + Road Pricing+ PRT net Results: Direct traffic impacts: Shorter travel times Shift from cars to podcars & commuter train 35 % less passenger car traffic in the morning rush hour Benefit-Cost Ratio: 0.97 to 1.21 More detailed analysis is required Technology available, but needs development TheThe CityCity ofof SödertäljeSödertälje <=<= Today’s Today’s Publ. Publ. Trp. Trp. inin Södertälje:Södertälje: 44 railways railways stations stations 22 commuter commuter rail rail lines lines 1313 urban urban bus bus lines lines 1616 inter-urban inter-urban bus bus lines lines 33 night night bus bus lines lines 162162 line-kms line-kms 1414 % % publ-trp-modal publ-trp-modal share share 88 % % modal modal share share locally locally 2525 000 000 daily daily trips trips PRTPRT feasibilityfeasibility studystudy forfor SödertäljeSödertälje PRT-network:PRT-network: ••4343 km km track track ••5555 stations stations ••700700 vehicles vehicles ••0-10-1 min min wait wait time time ••4545 km/hour km/hour speed speed Impacts:Impacts: ••Publ.Trp.modalPubl.Trp.modal share:share: withoutwithout PRT: PRT: 8 8 % % withwith PRT: PRT: 19% 19% ToTo the the year year 2030: 2030: FromFrom 25 25 000 000 to to 6767 500 500 daily daily publ.trp.publ.trp. tripstrips by by PRT PRT AnAn engineeringengineering PRTPRT studystudy forfor SödertäljeSödertälje PTR for Södertälje – a vision for a sustainable city traffic – technique, design and costs Made in 2008-09 by WSP Civils & LogistikCentrum 4 phases examined DesignDesign ofof PRTPRT inin SödertäljeSödertälje AA typicaltypical PRTPRT stationstation AA PRTPRT stationstation onon toptop ofof aa railwayrailway stationstation SödertäljeSödertälje BOT BOT financing:financing: PRTPRT cheapercheaper thanthan bus:bus: CapitalCapital cost:cost: 6.66.6 m€m€ per per km;km; totaltotal cost:cost: 289289 m€-43m€-43 km:km: CostCost perper trip:trip: Bus:Bus: 1.641.64 €:€: PRT:PRT: 0.820.82 €€ Södertälje annual costs & ticket revenue in M€ -7 Operating cost -22 -22 Capital cost: -3 PRT 12,5 Ticket revenue: Bus 7 -16,5 Net cost: -18 -25 -20 -15 -10 -5 0 5 10 15 PRTPRT FeasibilityFeasibility study studyPRT for for for Boländerna,Boländerna, Uppsala UppsalaUppsala Railway AA PRTPRT NetworkNetwork forfor BoländernaBoländerna station 9.49.4 kmkm single-track,single-track, 1616 stations,stations, 130130 vehiclesvehicles Shopping Mall Area OnlyOnly 5 5 %% BusBus tripstrips inin UppsalaUppsala todaytoday Modal split at Boländerna in Uppsala today Walk/Bike 30% Bus Car 5% 65% 2020 %% (four(four timestimes higher)higher) modalmodal splitsplit atat BoländernaBoländerna inin UppsalaUppsala withwith PRTPRT Modal split at Boländerna in Uppsala in 2020 with PRT Walk/Bike 25% Car 55% PRT 20% ConclusionsConclusions forfor UppsalaUppsala Modal share up from 5 % to 20 % From 4 200 (by bus) to 16 000 daily trips (by PRT) BOT financing proposed Cost per trip: Bus: 1.80 €, PRT: 1.30 € Benefit-Cost ratio: 1.1 to 2.1. Average: 1.4 Forthcoming decision making: At present on public consideration A new study will compare bus, LRT and PRT for the entire city of Uppsala Conclusions:Conclusions: PRTPRT PlansPlans inin SwedishSwedish Cites:Cites: 1. Many feasibility Studies 2. Several activities promoting PRT 3. Still: no political decision, yet, but: A new governmental task to examine implementation of PRT in cities 4. Mega study shows: modal share up by 15 %- units on average with PRT 5. BOT-Build-Operate & Transfer financing proposed 6. Social benefits often higher than costs 7. Two comparative studies (Bus, LRT & PRT) going on, one for Uppsala, one more general.

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    21 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us