DOCSLIB.ORG

Second NASA Technical Interchange Meeting (TIM): Advanced Technology Lifecycle Analysis System (ATLAS) Technology Tool Box (TTB) D.A

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Second NASA Technical Interchange Meeting (TIM): Advanced Technology Lifecycle Analysis System (ATLAS) Technology Tool Box (TTB) D.A National Aeronautics and NASA/CP—2005–214185 Space Administration IS04 George C. Marshall Space Flight Center Marshall Space Flight Center, Alabama 35812 Second NASA Technical Interchange Meeting (TIM): Advanced Technology Lifecycle Analysis System (ATLAS) Technology Tool Box (TTB) D.A. O’Neil, Meeting Chair Marshall Space Flight Center, Huntsville, Alabama J.C. Mankins, Meeting Co-Chair NASA Headquarters, Washington, DC C.B. Christensen, Meeting Facilitator The Tauri Group, Alexandria, Virginia E.C. Gresham, Proceedings Author The Tauri Group, Alexandria, Virginia Proceedings of a Technical Interchange Meeting sponsored by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration held in Huntsville, Alabama, July 27–29, 2005 October 2005 The NASA STI Program Office…in Profile Since its founding, NASA has been dedicated to • CONFERENCE PUBLICATION. Collected the advancement of aeronautics and space papers from scientific and technical science. The NASA Scientific and Technical conferences, symposia, seminars, or other Information (STI) Program Office plays a key meetings sponsored or cosponsored by NASA. part in helping NASA maintain this important role. • SPECIAL PUBLICATION. Scientific, technical, or historical information from The NASA STI Program Office is operated by NASA programs, projects, and mission, often Langley Research Center, the lead center for NASA’s concerned with subjects having substantial scientific and technical information. The NASA public interest. STI Program Office provides access to the NASA STI Database, the largest collection of aeronautical • TECHNICAL TRANSLATION. and space science STI in the world. The Program English-language translations of foreign Office is also NASA’s institutional mechanism scientific and technical material pertinent to for disseminating the results of its research and NASA’s mission. development activities. These results are published by NASA in the NASA STI Report Series, which Specialized services that complement the STI Program includes the following report types: Office’s diverse offerings include creating custom thesauri, building customized databases, organizing • TECHNICAL PUBLICATION. Reports of and publishing research results…even providing completed research or a major significant videos. phase of research that present the results of NASA programs and include extensive data For more information about the NASA STI Program or theoretical analysis. Includes compilations Office, see the following: of significant scientific and technical data and information deemed to be of continuing • Access the NASA STI Program Home Page at reference value. NASA’s counterpart of peer- http://www.sti.nasa.gov reviewed formal professional papers but has less stringent limitations on manuscript length • E-mail your question via the Internet to and extent of graphic presentations. [email protected] • TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM. Scientific • Fax your question to the NASA Access Help and technical findings that are preliminary Desk at 301–621–0134 or of specialized interest, e.g., quick release reports, working papers, and bibliographies • Telephone the NASA Access Help Desk at that contain minimal annotation. Does not 301–621–0390 contain extensive analysis. • Write to: • CONTRACTOR REPORT. Scientific and NASA Access Help Desk technical findings by NASA-sponsored NASA Center for AeroSpace Information contractors and grantees. 7121 Standard Drive Hanover, MD 21076–1320 301–621–0390 NASA/CP—2005–214185 Second NASA Technical Interchange Meeting (TIM): Advanced Technology Lifecycle Analysis System (ATLAS) Technology Tool Box (TTB) D.A. O’Neil, Meeting Chair Marshall Space Flight Center, Huntsville, Alabama J.C. Mankins, Meeting Co-Chair NASA Headquarters, Washington, DC C.B. Christensen, Meeting Facilitator The Tauri Group, Alexandria, Virginia E.C. Gresham, Proceedings Author The Tauri Group, Alexandria, Virginia Proceedngs of a Techncal Interchange Meetng sponsored by the Natonal Aeronautcs and Space Admnstraton held n Huntsvlle, Alabama, July 27–29, 2005 Natonal Aeronautcs and Space Admnstraton Marshall Space Flght Center • MSFC, Alabama 35812 October 2005 Acknowledgments The authors would like to acknowledge the assistance of those individuals who helped make this workshop possible: NASA Headquarters and John Mankins, Manager of Exploration Systems Research & Technology (ESR&T) Programs, Dr. Chris Moore, Manager of the Advanced Space Technologies (ASTP) Program, and Doug Craig, Manager of the Advanced Studies Concepts and Tools (ASCT) for their sponsorship; The Tauri Group for their analytical support, planning, and coordination; and Gloria Wortham, Universities Space Research Association (USRA), for her logistical support to the meeting. The workshop would not have been possible without the time and dedication given by all of the participants, all of whom are listed in Appendix B. In addition, several of the conference participants provided narrative summaries of presentations and discussions. Contributors to this Conference Publication include Linda Brewster, LaMonte Dent, Dr. Monica Doyle, Dr. Harvey Feingold, Wayne Goode, Joe Howell, Wayne Johnson, William Kahle, Jessica Kessler, Dr. Neville Marzwell, Jim McClanahan, Charles Morris, David O’Neil, Steve Patrick, Don Perkinson, Jim Thomas, and Tim Sarver Verhey. Available from: NASA Center for AeroSpace Information National Technical Information Service 7121 Standard Drive 5285 Port Royal Road Hanover, MD 21076–1320 Springfield, VA 22161 301–621–0390 703–487–4650 ii TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................................... 1 2. ATLAS APPLICATIONS ............................................................................................................... 2 3. WORKSHOP OBJECTIVES ......................................................................................................... 3 4. PREPARATION FOR WORKSHOP ............................................................................................. 4 5. PROCEEDINGS: OVERVIEW ..................................................................................................... 5 6. PROCEEDINGS: WEDNESDAY ................................................................................................ 6 6.1 Wednesday Plenary ................................................................................................................. 6 6.1.1 Openng Remarks From Headquarters ......................................................................... 6 6.1.2 ATLAS Overvew ........................................................................................................ 7 6.1.3 Technology Tool Box (TTB) ........................................................................................ 10 6.1.4 ATLAS Case Studes .................................................................................................... 12 6.2 Wednesday Models and Archtectures Workng Group .......................................................... 13 6.2.1 ATLAS Capabltes and Needs ................................................................................... 13 6.2.2 Subsystem Interacton .................................................................................................. 15 6.2.3 Case Study Bulder Demonstraton .............................................................................. 16 6.2.4 Ptolemy II RangeReader and RangeWrter Objects .................................................... 17 6.2.5 Expanson of Cost Model Capabltes ........................................................................ 20 6.3 Wednesday Technology Data Workng Group ........................................................................ 21 6.3.1 Data Collection and Vetting Process ............................................................................ 21 6.3.2 Data Sets from NGLT and SPST ................................................................................. 22 6.3.3 Hstorcal Technology Data From Apollo and Skylab ................................................. 24 7. PROCEEDINGS: THURSDAY ..................................................................................................... 26 7.1 Thursday Plenary .................................................................................................................... 26 7.1.1 Integrated Vehicle Health Management ....................................................................... 26 7.1.2 Thermal Management Subsystem Technologes .......................................................... 28 7.1.3 Rendezvous and Dockng Mechansms ....................................................................... 29 7.1.4 Cryogenc Propellant Management, Storage & Transfer ............................................. 30 7.1.5 Modelng and Trackng Technology Performance n Autonomous Systems and Robotcs ................................................................................................................. 34 7.1.6 System Model Presentatons ........................................................................................ 38 7.1.7 Headquarters Commentary .......................................................................................... 40 TABLE OF CONTENTS (Continued) 7.2 Thursday Models and Archtectures Workng Group ............................................................. 40 7.2.1 Resolvng the Solver Problem ..................................................................................... 40 7.2.2 Technology
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Master's Thesis
    MASTER'S THESIS On-Orbit Servicing Satellite Docking Mechanism Modeling and Simulation Karim Bondoky 2015 Master of Science (120 credits) Space Engineering - Space Master Luleå University of Technology Department of Computer Science, Electrical and Space Engineering On-Orbit Servicing Satellite Docking Mechanism Modeling and Simulation by Karim Bondoky A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment for the degree of Masters of Science in Space Science and Technology Supervisors: Eng. Sebastian Schwarz Airbus Defence and Space Prof. Dr. Sergio Montenegro University of W¨urzburg Dr. Johnny Ejemalm Lule˚aUniversity of Technology October 2014 Declaration of Authorship I, Karim Bondoky, declare that this thesis titled, `On-Orbit Servicing Satellite Docking Mechanism Modeling and Simulation' and the work presented in it are my own. I confirm that: This work was done wholly while in candidature for a research degree at both Universities. Where any part of this thesis has previously been submitted for a degree or any other qualification, this has been clearly stated. Where I have consulted the published work of others, this is always clearly at- tributed. Where I have quoted from the work of others, the source is always given. With the exception of such quotations, this thesis is entirely my own work. I have acknowledged all main sources of help. Signed: Date: 15.10.2014 i Abstract Docking mechanism of two spacecraft is considered as one of the main challenging as- pects of an on-orbit servicing mission. This thesis presents the modeling, analysis and software simulation of one of the docking mechanisms called "probe and drogue". The aim of this thesis is to model the docking mechanism, simulate the docking process and use the results as a reference for the Hardware-In-the-Loop simulation (HIL) of the docking mechanism, in order to verify and validate it.
    [Show full text]
  • Orbital Fueling Architectures Leveraging Commercial Launch Vehicles for More Affordable Human Exploration
    ORBITAL FUELING ARCHITECTURES LEVERAGING COMMERCIAL LAUNCH VEHICLES FOR MORE AFFORDABLE HUMAN EXPLORATION by DANIEL J TIFFIN Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of: Master of Science Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY January, 2020 CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF GRADUATE STUDIES We hereby approve the thesis of DANIEL JOSEPH TIFFIN Candidate for the degree of Master of Science*. Committee Chair Paul Barnhart, PhD Committee Member Sunniva Collins, PhD Committee Member Yasuhiro Kamotani, PhD Date of Defense 21 November, 2019 *We also certify that written approval has been obtained for any proprietary material contained therein. 2 Table of Contents List of Tables................................................................................................................... 5 List of Figures ................................................................................................................. 6 List of Abbreviations ....................................................................................................... 8 1. Introduction and Background.................................................................................. 14 1.1 Human Exploration Campaigns ....................................................................... 21 1.1.1. Previous Mars Architectures ..................................................................... 21 1.1.2. Latest Mars Architecture .........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Space Sector Brochure
    SPACE SPACE REVOLUTIONIZING THE WAY TO SPACE SPACECRAFT TECHNOLOGIES PROPULSION Moog provides components and subsystems for cold gas, chemical, and electric Moog is a proven leader in components, subsystems, and systems propulsion and designs, develops, and manufactures complete chemical propulsion for spacecraft of all sizes, from smallsats to GEO spacecraft. systems, including tanks, to accelerate the spacecraft for orbit-insertion, station Moog has been successfully providing spacecraft controls, in- keeping, or attitude control. Moog makes thrusters from <1N to 500N to support the space propulsion, and major subsystems for science, military, propulsion requirements for small to large spacecraft. and commercial operations for more than 60 years. AVIONICS Moog is a proven provider of high performance and reliable space-rated avionics hardware and software for command and data handling, power distribution, payload processing, memory, GPS receivers, motor controllers, and onboard computing. POWER SYSTEMS Moog leverages its proven spacecraft avionics and high-power control systems to supply hardware for telemetry, as well as solar array and battery power management and switching. Applications include bus line power to valves, motors, torque rods, and other end effectors. Moog has developed products for Power Management and Distribution (PMAD) Systems, such as high power DC converters, switching, and power stabilization. MECHANISMS Moog has produced spacecraft motion control products for more than 50 years, dating back to the historic Apollo and Pioneer programs. Today, we offer rotary, linear, and specialized mechanisms for spacecraft motion control needs. Moog is a world-class manufacturer of solar array drives, propulsion positioning gimbals, electric propulsion gimbals, antenna positioner mechanisms, docking and release mechanisms, and specialty payload positioners.
    [Show full text]
  • NASA Ames Research Center Intelligent Systems and High End Computing
    NASA Ames Research Center Intelligent Systems and High End Computing Dr. Eugene Tu, Director NASA Ames Research Center Moffett Field, CA 94035-1000 A 80-year Journey 1960 Soviet Union United States Russia Japan ESA India 2020 Illustration by: Bryan Christie Design Updated: 2015 Protecting our Planet, Exploring the Universe Earth Heliophysics Planetary Astrophysics Launch missions such as JWST to Advance knowledge unravel the of Earth as a Determine the mysteries of the system to meet the content, origin, and universe, explore challenges of Understand the sun evolution of the how it began and environmental and its interactions solar system and evolved, and search change and to with Earth and the the potential for life for life on planets improve life on solar system. elsewhere around other stars earth “NASA Is With You When You Fly” Safe, Transition Efficient to Low- Growth in Carbon Global Propulsion Operations Innovation in Real-Time Commercial System- Supersonic Wide Aircraft Safety Assurance Assured Ultra-Efficient Autonomy for Commercial Aviation Vehicles Transformation NASA Centers and Installations Goddard Institute for Space Studies Plum Brook Glenn Research Station Independent Center Verification and Ames Validation Facility Research Center Goddard Space Flight Center Headquarters Jet Propulsion Wallops Laboratory Flight Facility Armstrong Flight Research Center Langley Research White Sands Center Test Facility Stennis Marshall Space Kennedy Johnson Space Space Michoud Flight Center Space Center Center Assembly Center Facility
    [Show full text]
  • ISS Interface Mechanisms and Their Lineage
    ISS Interface Mechanisms and their Heritage The International Space Station, by nurturing technological development of a variety of pressurized and unpressurized interface mechanisms fosters “competition at the technology level”. Such redundancy and diversity allows for the development and testing of mechanisms that might be used for future exploration efforts. The International Space Station, as a test-bed for exploration, has 4 types of pressurized interfaces between elements and 6 unpressurized attachment mechanisms. Lessons learned from the design, test and operations of these mechanisms will help inform the design for a new international standard pressurized docking mechanism for the NASA Docking System. This paper will examine the attachment mechanisms on the ISS and their attributes. It will also look ahead at the new NASA docking system and trace its lineage to heritage mechanisms. ISS Interface Mechanisms and their Heritage John Cook1, Valery Aksamentov2, Thomas Hoffman3, and Wes Bruner4 The Boeing Company, 13100 Space Center Boulevard, Houston, Texas, 77059 The International Space Station, by requiring technological development of a variety of pressurized and unpressurized interface mechanisms fosters “competition at the technology level”. Such redundancy and diversity allows for the development and testing of mechanisms that might be used for future exploration efforts. The International Space Station, as a test-bed for exploration, has four types of pressurized interfaces between elements and nine unpressurized attachment mechanisms. Lessons learned from the design, test and operations of these mechanisms will aid in the design for a new International Standard pressurized docking mechanism for future NASA and commercial vehicles. This paper will examine the attachment mechanisms on the ISS and their attributes.
    [Show full text]
  • The Legacies of Apollo 11 Gregory A
    John Carroll University Carroll Collected 2019 Faculty Bibliography Faculty Bibliographies Community Homepage 5-2019 The Legacies of Apollo 11 Gregory A. DiLisi John Carroll University, [email protected] Greg Brown Armstrong Air and Space Museum Follow this and additional works at: https://collected.jcu.edu/fac_bib_2019 Part of the Physics Commons Recommended Citation DiLisi, Gregory A. and Brown, Greg, "The Legacies of Apollo 11" (2019). 2019 Faculty Bibliography. 9. https://collected.jcu.edu/fac_bib_2019/9 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty Bibliographies Community Homepage at Carroll Collected. It has been accepted for inclusion in 2019 Faculty Bibliography by an authorized administrator of Carroll Collected. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Legacies of Apollo 11 Gregory A. DiLisi and Alison Chaney, John Carroll University, University Heights, OH Greg Brown, Armstrong Air and Space Museum, Wapakoneta, OH ifty years ago this summer, three men aboard Apollo 11 that at the time of his address, NASA had only a 15-minute traveled from our planet to the Moon. On July 20, 1969, ballistic flight by astronaut Alan Shepard to its credit. From at 10:56:15 p.m. EDT, 38-year-old commander Neil 1958 to 1963, the 11 flights (six crewed) of Project Mercury FArmstrong moved his left foot from the landing pad of the successfully put a man into orbit and returned him safely to lunar module (LM) Eagle onto the gray, powdery surface of Earth. From 1964-1966, the 12 flights (10 crewed) of Project the Sea of Tranquility and became the first person to step onto Gemini established that humans could indeed survive in the lunar soil.
    [Show full text]
  • The Courage to Soar Higher—Giant Leap for Mankind
    Lesson 8 Vocabulary Vocabulary ascent stage – the part of the lunar module (LM) that contains the crew cabin; an equipment bay; the ascent rocket engine and fuel to return to the lunar orbit; and the components for instrumentation, guidance, navigation, life support, and communications command module (CM) – the part of a space vehicle designed to carry the crew, the chief communications equip- ment, and the equipment to travel The ascent stage of the LM through Earth’s atmosphere. The Apollo CM remained in lunar orbit and did not descend to the lunar surface The CM over the lunar surface descent stage – the part of the LM that contains the landing gear; landing radar antenna; descent rocket engine and fuel to land on the Moon; and several cargo compartments used to carry surface tools, lunar sample collection boxes, some parts of the lunar rover, a surface television camera, and supplies for an The descent stage is the bottom half of extended lunar visit by the crew the LM and includes the “legs.” The Courage to Soar Higher—An Educator Guide With Activities In Science, Mathematics, Language Arts, and Technology 159 Lesson 8 Vocabulary device – a piece of equipment or a mechanism designed or invented for a particular purpose EVA – means extravehicular activity; an activ- ity or maneuver performed by an astronaut outside a spacecraft in space forecasting – predicting a future condition or occurrence; calculating in advance a prediction, especially as to the weather Astronaut Harrison Schmitt during an EVA Genesis – the first book of the Bible Hoover Dam – The Hoover Dam is one of the world’s largest dams.
    [Show full text]
  • Automated Rendezvous and Docking of Spacecraft (Cambridge
    This page intentionally left blank Automated Rendezvous and Docking of Spacecraft The definitive reference for space engineers on all issues related to rendezvous and docking/berthing (RVD/B), Automated Rendezvous and Docking of Spacecraft answers keyquestions such as: • How does the docking vehicle accuratelyapproach the target spacecraft? • What technologyis needed aboard the spacecraft to perform au- tomatic rendezvous and docking, and what systems are required byground control to supervise this process? • How can the proper functioning of all rendezvous related equip- ment, systems and operations be verified before launch? The book provides an overview of the major issues governing approach and mating strategies, and system concepts for rendezvous and docking/berthing. These issues are described and explained such that aerospace engineers, students and even newcomers to the field can acquire a basic understanding of RVD/B. Cambridge Aerospace Series 16 Editors: MICHAEL J. RYCROFT AND WEI SHYY 1. J. M. Rolfe and K. J. Staples (eds.): Flight Simulation 2. P. Berlin: The Geostationary Applications Satellite 3. M. J. T. Smith: Aircraft Noise 4. N. X. Vinh: Flight Mechanics of High-Performance Aircraft 5. W. A. Mair and D. L. Birdsall: Aircraft Performance 6. M. J. Abzug and E. E. Larrabee: Airplane Stability and Control 7. M. J. Sidi: Spacecraft Dynamics and Control 8. J. D. Anderson: A History of Aerodynamics 9. A. M. Cruise, J. A. Bowles, C. V. Goodall, and T. J. Patrick: Principles of Space Instrument Design 10. G. A. Khouryand J. D. Gillett (eds.): Airship Technology 11. J. Fielding: Introduction to Aircraft Design 12. J. G. Leishman: Principles of Helicopter Dynamics 13.
    [Show full text]
  • CENTER SERIES DOCKING and RENDEZVOUS Inventory
    DOCKING AND RENDEZVOUS Rev Date:5/9/2000 Section 093 CENTER SERIES DOCKING AND RENDEZVOUS This subseries consists of documents related to the design and operation of orbital docking mechanisms for spacecraft rendezvous. This includes correspondence, contractor reports, design notes, and other materials related to Apollo, Skylab, Space Shuttle, and Space Station docking technology. In addition, the subseries includes information on international docking systems (with emphasis on the Soviet Salyut spacecraft). Of particular interest is a large group of materials from the early 1960's on the subject of Lunar Orbital Rendezvous. They originate with the papers of John C. Houbolt, D. Brainerd Holmes, and John Eggleston. The documents are dated from 1960 through 1988 and were collected by Mark Clark in the course of research for a historical thesis on docking technology. (A copy of the completed paper is included in the series.) Material is arranged chronologically. Reports are filed separately from the correspondence. Inventory SubHeading: Box Number: 1 Correspondence 1949, 1951, 1960 - 1963 Correspondence 1964 - 1969 Correspondence 1970 Correspondence 1971 Correspondence 1972 Correspondence 1973 Correspondence 1974 - 1979 SubHeading: Box Number: 2 Correspondence 1980 - 1981 Correspondence 1982 - 1984 Correspondence 1985 - 1987 Undated Material SubHeading: Box Number: 3 Studies Related to Lunar and Planetary Missions by the Lunar May 26, 1960 Trajectory Group of the Theoretical Mechanics Division The Trajectories and Some Practical Guidance
    [Show full text]
  • The Legacy of Apollo”
    COMMITTEE ON SCIENCE, SPACE, AND TECHNOLOGY U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES HEARING CHARTER “The Legacy of Apollo” Tuesday, July 16, 2019 10:00 AM 2318 Rayburn House Office Building PURPOSE The purpose of the hearing is to commemorate the 50th anniversary of the Apollo 11 Moon landing. WITNESSES • Mr. Charles Fishman, author of One Giant Leap: The Impossible Mission That Flew Us to the Moon1 • Dr. David W. Miller, Vice President and Chief Technology Officer, The Aerospace Corporation • Dr. Peter Jakab, Chief Curator, Smithsonian Air and Space Museum OVERARCHING QUESTIONS • What events and factors led to the decision to pursue the Moon landing and the Apollo program? • What is the legacy of Apollo? • What scientific and technological advancements did the Apollo program enable? BACKGROUND On October 4, 1957, the Soviet Union launched Sputnik 1, humanity’s first artificial satellite. The Soviets followed Sputnik 1 by launching the first animal, a dog named Laika, into space on board Sputnik 2. The United States launched its first satellite, Explorer I, on January 31, 1958, which contained scientific instrumentation and led to the discovery of the Van Allen radiation belts. The “Space Race” had begun. Later in 1958, Congress passed, and President Eisenhower signed, the National Aeronautics and Space Act, establishing the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) from the National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics.2 1 Charles Fishman, One Giant Leap: The Impossible Mission That Flew Us to the Moon, Simon and Schuster, 2019. 2 Pub. L. No. 85-568, “National Aeronautics and Space Act of 1958,” July 29, 1958. 1 In 1959, the Soviet Union sent the first ever spacecraft to the Moon, Luna 2.
    [Show full text]
  • (HLS) Ascent Element (AE) Lunar Crew Module (LCM) Technology Opportunities
    Human Landing System (HLS) Ascent Element (AE) Lunar Crew Module (LCM) Technology Opportunities Selected Opportunities, Capabilities, Benefits and Needs Applicable to the HLS BAA Appendix H for an Integrated Lander 03 July 2019 NASA Points of Contact (POC) at the Johnson Space Center (JSC): • [email protected], JSC Lander Project Manager, HLS AE/LCM Lead • [email protected], JSC Exploration Technology Office Manager Table of Contents 1.0 CORE FLIGHT SOFTWARE (CFS) 2 2.0 AES MODULE POWER SYSTEM (AMPS) 11 3.0 DOCKING SYSTEMS 16 4.0 OPTICAL NAVIGATION (OP-NAV) 23 5.0 SPACESUIT WATER MEMBRANE EVAPORATOR (SWME) 24 1 1.0 CORE FLIGHT SOFTWARE (CFS) CFS is an open-source software framework and asset for Flight Software Reuse. NASA POC and TechPort link: • [email protected], PhD, LCM FSW Lead at JSC • https://techport.nasa.gov/view/11771 1.1 CFS OVERVIEW The Core Flight Software (CFS) framework is an open-source TRL-9 and human-rated NASA Agency asset designed from the ground up for flight software reuse. It is used within the government as well as by commercial companies, international partners, and within academia, and has a scalable applicability to real-time space systems. The CFS provides a component-based architecture, platform and operating system independence, a host of communication and common services, as well as data- driven/reusable applications enabling increased productivity, interoperability with other modules/elements, human certification, and rapid access to space. 1.2 BACKGROUND The Core Flight Software (CFS) Framework is an open-source product originally developed by NASA Goddard Space Flight Center (GSFC) and first flown in 2009 with the Lunar Reconnaissance orbiter (LRO) mission.
    [Show full text]
  • NASA Technology Roadmaps TA 4: Robotics and Autonomous Systems
    NASA Technology Roadmaps TA 4: Robotics and Autonomous Systems May 2015 Draft 2015 NASA Technology Roadmaps DRAFT TA 4: Robotics and Autonomous Systems Foreword NASA is leading the way with a balanced program of space exploration, aeronautics, and science research. Success in executing NASA’s ambitious aeronautics activities and space missions requires solutions to difficult technical challenges that build on proven capabilities and require the development of new capabilities. These new capabilities arise from the development of novel cutting-edge technologies. The promising new technology candidates that will help NASA achieve our extraordinary missions are identified in our Technology Roadmaps. The roadmaps are a set of documents that consider a wide range of needed technology candidates and development pathways for the next 20 years. The roadmaps are a foundational element of the Strategic Technology Investment Plan (STIP), an actionable plan that lays out the strategy for developing those technologies essential to the pursuit of NASA’s mission and achievement of National goals. The STIP provides prioritization of the technology candidates within the roadmaps and guiding principles for technology investment. The recommendations provided by the National Research Council heavily influence NASA’s technology prioritization. NASA’s technology investments are tracked and analyzed in TechPort, a web-based software system that serves as NASA’s integrated technology data source and decision support tool. Together, the roadmaps, the STIP, and TechPort provide NASA the ability to manage the technology portfolio in a new way, aligning mission directorate technology investments to minimize duplication, and lower cost while providing critical capabilities that support missions, commercial industry, and longer-term National needs.
    [Show full text]