DOCSLIB.ORG

Team Voyager Final Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Team Voyager Final Report Orbiting Asteroid for Strategic In-situ Supplies A Crewed Mission for Deep Space Asteroid Exploration March 27, 2015 1 Team Members Adrian Pfeifle (University of Stuttgart) Akshata Krishnamurthy (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) Alicia Lanz (California Institute of Technology) Brad Nakanishi (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) Casey Handmer (California Institute of Technology) Jared Atkinson (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) Javier Roa (Technical University of Madrid) Jeffrey Montes (Columbia University) Matthew Paragano (Yale University) Mehdi Sabzalian (Concordia University) Michael Anderson (University of California, Los Angeles) Monica Hew (Stanford) Samantha Rawlins (California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo) Shanti Swaroop Kandala (Indian Institute of Technology Hyderabad) Sinead O'Sullivan (Georgia Institute of Technology) Mentors Steve Edberg (Asteroid Scientist) John Elliott (Systems Engineer/ISRU) Damon Landau (Mission Design/Trajectory Planning) Charles Dandido (Mechanical) Paul Woodmansee (Propulsion) Jackie Green (Planetary Scientist/A Team Lead) Randii Wessen (Astronautics System Engineer) 2 Student leads Hayden Burgoyne Niko Cymbalist Jay Qi Sponsors Executive Summary Orbiting Asteroid for Strategic In-situ Supplies (OASIS) is an innovative, frontier opening crewed mission to a robotically captured asteroid. In 2024, three astronauts will fly on SLS to a Distant Retrograde Lunar Orbit. Together with the Multi-Purpose Docking Vehicle and science payload they will dock with the Asteroid Redirect Vehicle and a deep space Labitat sent via a separate Falcon Heavy launch and ballistic trajectory. Following on from the first Asteroid Redirect Crewed Mission (ARCM), over 25 days in lunar orbit they will execute a series of space-rock walks to characterize and extract asteroid resources. OASIS is a versatile test bed of Flexible Path crewed space exploration technology as well as a generational advance in asteroid mining and asteroid planetary defense. List of Acronyms NEA - Near Earth Asteroid LEO - Low Earth Orbit MEO - Medium Earth Orbit GTO - Geostationary Transfer Orbit TLI - Trans-Lunar Injection 3 DRO - Distant Retrograde Orbit FRT - Free Return Trajectory PLF - Payload Fairing GNC - Guidance, Navigation and Control ECLSS - Environmental Control and Life Support System ARV - Asteroid Redirect Vehicle ARM - Asteroid Redirect Mission ARCM - Asteroid Redirect Crewed Mission MPDM - Multi-Purpose Docking Module MPCV - Multi-Purpose Crew Vehicle (Orion) ISRU - In Situ Resource Utilization OASIS - Orbiting Asteroid for Strategic In-situ Supplies SLS - Space Launch System EUS - Exploration Upper Stage D4H - Delta IV Heavy FH - Falcon Heavy SAFER - Simplified Aid For EVA Rescue EMU - Extravehicular Mobility Unit EVA - Extravehicular Activity Table of Contents Team Members .................................................................................................................................. 2 Mentors ................................................................................................................................................. 2 Student leads ...................................................................................................................................... 3 Sponsors ............................................................................................................................................... 3 Executive Summary .............................................................................................................................. 3 List of Acronyms .................................................................................................................................... 3 Table of Contents, List of Figures, List of Tables ..................................................................... 4 Introduction - Why a Near Earth Asteroid mission? .............................................................. 7 Problem statement .......................................................................................................................... 7 Inspiration and Context ................................................................................................................. 8 OASIS and the Flexible Path ......................................................................................................... 9 Mission Overview .................................................................................................................................. 9 Mission Statement ............................................................................................................................ 9 Mission Objectives ........................................................................................................................ 10 Primary Science Objectives ....................................................................................................... 10 Secondary Science Objectives .................................................................................................. 10 Engineering Objectives ............................................................................................................... 10 4 System Requirements .................................................................................................................. 10 Scientific Success Criteria – Minimum ................................................................................. 10 Scientific Success Criteria – Full .............................................................................................. 11 Mission Architecture .................................................................................................................... 11 Programmatics ............................................................................................................................... 12 Subsystem ......................................................................................................................................... 12 Cost ...................................................................................................................................................... 12 Risk ...................................................................................................................................................... 12 Planetary Protection .................................................................................................................... 12 Mission Architecture of OASIS ...................................................................................................... 13 Overview ........................................................................................................................................... 13 Planetary Protection ......................................................................................................................... 19 Launch Dates ................................................................................................................................... 22 Launch Vehicle ................................................................................................................................ 22 Mission Duration ........................................................................................................................... 22 Science Overview ............................................................................................................................... 23 Primary Science Objectives ....................................................................................................... 24 1. Characterize the internal structure and composition of asteroid ....................... 25 2. Characterize space environment around asteroid ..................................................... 25 3. Extract, process, and demonstrate use of resources ................................................. 25 4. Contribute pioneering human health and behavioral data in deep space ....... 25 5. Demonstrate human autonomous decision making in a deep space environment .................................................................................................................................... 25 Secondary Science Objectives .................................................................................................. 25 1. Advance our understanding of the origin and evolution of the solar system 25 Science Traceability Matrix ....................................................................................................... 25 Minimum Science Mission Success Criteria ....................................................................... 26 2. Return samples to Earth with proper storage ............................................................. 26 3. Excavate 1 kg of material ...................................................................................................... 26 4. Record radiation levels and cosmic ray exposure once per day in the human living quarters for the duration of the docked portion of the mission .................. 26 5. Characterize the space environment for a single asteroid location ................... 26 6. Process, utilize, and generate a specified amount of 1 specified resources .... 26 7. Successful completion of 1 experiment selected by the astronaut from a predetermined list ........................................................................................................................ 26 5 8. Monitor physiological
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 2006 Spinoff Spinoff 2006 Innovative Partnerships Program
    National Aeronautics and Space Administration 2006 f spinof Spinoff 2006 Innovative Partnerships Program Developed by Publications and Graphics Department NASA Center for AeroSpace Information (CASI) Early in the next decade, the new Crew Exploration Vehicle will begin to ferry crew and supplies to the International Space Station. Cutting-edge technology like this National Aeronautics and leads the way for development of new Space Administration spinoff products that benefit life on Earth. Table of Contents 3 Foreword Environmental and Agricultural Resources 4 Introduction PRP: The Proven Solution for Cleaning Up Oil Spills .............................62 5 Partnership Benefits Progressive Plant Growing Has Business Blooming ..................................64 FLIPPER: Validation for Remote Ocean Imaging ....................................68 Health and Medicine Paper-Thin Plastic Film Soaks Up Sun to Create Solar Energy ................70 Ingestible Thermometer Pill Aids Athletes in Beating the Heat ................6 Saving Space and Time: The Tractor That Einstein Built.........................74 Space-Proven Medical Monitor: The Total Patient-Care Package ............10 Computer Technology From Planetary Imaging to Enzyme Screening .........................................12 A Predictive Approach to Eliminating Errors in Software Code ................76 Transportation Scheduling Software for Complex Scenarios .............................................78 Damage-Tolerant Fan Casings for Jet Engines .........................................14
    [Show full text]
  • First Level Design and System Design of Janus Liquid Oxygen-Liquid Methane Lander Jahir Fernandez University of Texas at El Paso, J [email protected]
    University of Texas at El Paso DigitalCommons@UTEP Open Access Theses & Dissertations 2017-01-01 First Level Design And System Design Of Janus Liquid Oxygen-Liquid Methane Lander Jahir Fernandez University of Texas at El Paso, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.utep.edu/open_etd Part of the Mechanical Engineering Commons Recommended Citation Fernandez, Jahir, "First Level Design And System Design Of Janus Liquid Oxygen-Liquid Methane Lander" (2017). Open Access Theses & Dissertations. 444. https://digitalcommons.utep.edu/open_etd/444 This is brought to you for free and open access by DigitalCommons@UTEP. It has been accepted for inclusion in Open Access Theses & Dissertations by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@UTEP. For more information, please contact [email protected]. FIRST LEVEL DESIGN AND SYSTEM DESIGN OF JANUS LIQUID OXYGEN-LIQUID METHANE LANDER JAHIR FERNANDEZ Master’s Program in Mechanical Engineering APPROVED: Ahsan Choudhuri, Ph.D., Chair John F. Chessa, Ph.D., Co-chair Luis Rene Contreras, Ph.D. Charles H. Ambler, Ph.D. Dean of the Graduate School Copyright © By Jahir Fernandez 2017 FIRST LEVEL DESIGN AND SYSTEM DESIGN OF JANUS LIQUID OXYGEN-LIQUID METHANE LANDER By JAHIR FERNANDEZ, B.S. MECHANICAL ENGINEERIN THESIS Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of The University of Texas at El Paso in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE Department of Mechanical Engineering THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT EL PASO December 2017 Acknowledgements I would like to thank Dr. Ahsan Choudhuri for the opportunity to work at the cSETR. It has been an amazing experience working at the center, where the research has opened many doors for me and through which I was able to intern with NASA at Marshall Space Flight Center.
    [Show full text]
  • Contamination Control Technology Study for Achieving the Science Objectives of Life-Detection Missions
    Contamination Control Technology Study for Achieving the Science Objectives of Life-Detection Missions Study Team: Chris McKay, NASA ARC, (650)604-6864, [email protected] (submitting author) Alfonso Davila, NASA ARC, [email protected] Jennifer Eigenbrode, NASA GSFC, [email protected] Chris Lorentson, NASA GSFC, [email protected] Rob Gold, JHU/APL, [email protected] John Canham, Northrop Grumman/NASA GSFC, [email protected] Anthony Dazzo, KBR Inc./NASA GSFC, [email protected] Therese Errigo, NASA GSFC, [email protected] Faith Kujawa, JHU/APL, [email protected] Dave Kusnierkiewicz, JHU/APL, [email protected] Charles Sandy, ILC Dover, crsandy @ilcdover.com Erich Schulze, JHU/APL, Erich.Schulze@jhuapl Antonios Seas, NASA GSFC [email protected] Science Contamination Control Technology Study Summary: This white paper summaries technological advances in science-required contamination-control engineering for in situ and sample-return life-detection missions in the Solar System. Key study results are: 1) New spacecraft !arrier design that accommodates MMRT$s% is cleana!le% and is repaira!le. &) 'urge gas cleanliness of 1 part per trillion HC impurity limit is feasible. )) The !arrier reduces particle contamination *likely !iological) from fairing to spacecraft !y 1, -&-1,-). -) Spacecraft surfaces protected !y !arrier are 1,-&,. cleaner after launch than !efore launch. /) 0n-1ight !a+e-out of critical surfaces significantly reduced molecular contamination *!y 1,-3 to 1,-1&). 0mplementing a full spacecraft !arrier% collector cover and purge% and in-1ight cleaning steps will achieve cleanliness levels required of science instruments *down to femtomolar levels of !iomolecules).
    [Show full text]
  • Preparation of Papers for AIAA Journals
    ASCEND 10.2514/6.2020-4000 November 16-18, 2020, Virtual Event ASCEND 2020 Cryogenic Fluid Management Technologies Enabling for the Artemis Program and Beyond Hans C. Hansen* and Wesley L. Johnson† NASA Glenn Research Center, Cleveland, Ohio, 44135, USA Michael L. Meyer‡ NASA Engineering Safety Center, Cleveland, Ohio, 44135, USA Arthur H. Werkheiser§ and Jonathan R. Stephens¶ NASA Marshall Space Flight Center, Huntsville, Alabama, 35808, USA NASA is endeavoring on an ambitious return to the Moon and eventually on to Mars through the Artemis Program leveraging innovative technologies to establish sustainable exploration architectures collaborating with US commercial and international partners [1]. Future NASA architectures have baselined cryogenic propulsion systems to support lunar missions and ultimately future missions to Mars. NASA has been investing in maturing CFM active and passive storage, transfer, and gauging technologies over the last decade plus primarily focused on ground development with a few small- scale microgravity fluid experiments. Recently, NASA created a Cryogenic Fluid Management (CFM) Technology Roadmap identifying the critical gaps requiring further development to reach a technology readiness level (TRL) of 6 prior to infusion to flight applications. To address the technology gaps the Space Technology Mission Directorate (STMD) strategically plans to invest in a diversified CFM portfolio approach through ground and flight demonstrations, collaborating with international partners, and leveraging Public Private Partnerships (PPPs) opportunities with US industry through Downloaded by Michele Dominiak on December 23, 2020 | http://arc.aiaa.org DOI: 10.2514/6.2020-4000 the Tipping Point and Announcement of Collaborative Opportunities (ACO) solicitations. Once proven, these system capabilities will enable the high performing cryogenic propellant systems needed for the Artemis Program and beyond.
    [Show full text]
  • H M 7 P a G E 1 a MEMORIAL HONORING the MEMORY OF
    H A MEMORIAL M HONORING THE MEMORY OF THE SEVEN ASTRONAUTS WHO SERVED ON THE 7 P SPACE SHUTTLE COLUMBIA. a g e WHEREAS, the members of this chamber are grief-stricken at the loss of the 1 space shuttle Columbia and her seven astronauts on Saturday, February 1, 2003; and WHEREAS, the women and men who perished aboard Columbia embodied the very best qualities of mankind. Their intelligence, diligence and valor led to their selection for the space program and their presence on Columbia; and WHEREAS, today we pause not only to remember this tragedy, but we also pause to honor the achievements of seven exemplary people; and WHEREAS, let us recite the names of the seven astronauts: Rick D. Husband, age forty-five and the commander of Columbia. Commander Husband was a colonel in the United States air force. He was selected as an astronaut in 1994 and prior to this mission had logged two hundred thirty hours in space. His home was Amarillo, Texas; William C. McCool, age forty-one and the pilot for the mission. He was a commander in the United States navy and a former test pilot. Commander McCool became an astronaut in 1996, and this was his first space flight. His home was Lubbock, Texas; Michael P. Anderson, age forty-three and the payload commander for Columbia. Lieutenant Colonel Anderson was an air force man who grew up as the son of an air force man. Selected as an astronaut in 1994, he had previously logged over two hundred eleven hours in space.
    [Show full text]
  • Michael R. Barratt (M.D.) NASA Astronaut
    National Aeronautics and Space Administration Lyndon B. Johnson Space Center Houston, Texas 77058 August 2020 Michael R. Barratt (M.D.) NASA Astronaut Summary: Dr. Michael R. Barratt was selected by NASA in 2000. Board certified in Internal and Aerospace Medicine, he has participated in two spaceflights. In 2009, Dr. Barratt served as Flight Engineer for Expedition 19/20. This marked the transition from three to six permanent International Space Station crew members. During this time, he performed two spacewalks. He also flew on STS-133, which delivered the Permanent Multipurpose Module and fourth Express Logistics Carrier. Currently, Dr. Barratt serves in the Mission Support branches providing medical and human factors expertise to multiple spaceflight programs. Personal Data: Born on April 16, 1959 in Vancouver, Washington. Considers Camas, Washington, to be his home town. Married to the former Michelle Lynne Sasynuik. They have five children. His mother, Donna Barratt, resides in Camas, Washington. Personal and recreational interests include sailing, boat restoration and nautical history, carpentry, writing, cooking good food in austere places, family and church activities. Education: Graduated from Camas High School, Camas, WA, 1977. Bachelor of Science in Zoology, University of Washington, 1981. Doctor of Medicine (M.D.) from Northwestern University, 1985. Completed a three-year residency in Internal Medicine at Northwestern University in 1988. Completed Chief Residency year at Veterans Administration Lakeside Hospital in Chicago in 1989. Completed residency and Master’s program in Aerospace Medicine at Wright State University in 1991. Board certified in Internal and Aerospace Medicine. NASA Experience: Dr. Barratt came to NASA JSC in May 1991 employed as a project physician with KRUG Life Sciences, working on medical systems for Space Station Freedom.
    [Show full text]
  • Why NASA's Planet-Hunting Astrophysics Telescope Is an Easy Budget Target, and What Defeat Would Mean PAGE 24
    Q & A 12 ASTRONAUT’S VIEW 20 SPACE LAUNCH 34 Neil deGrasse Tyson A realistic moon plan SLS versus commercial SPECIAL REPORT SPACE DARK ENERGY DILEMMA Why NASA’s planet-hunting astrophysics telescope is an easy budget target, and what defeat would mean PAGE 24 APRIL 2018 | A publication of the American Institute of Aeronautics andd Astronautics | aeroaerospaceamerica.aiaa.orgerospaceamerica.aiaa.org 9–11 JULY 2018 CINCINNATI, OH ANNOUNCING EXPANDED TECHNICAL CONTENT FOR 2018! You already know about our extensive technical paper presentations, but did you know that we are now offering an expanded educational program as part of the AIAA Propulsion and Energy Forum and Exposition? In addition to our pre-forum short courses and workshops, we’ve enhanced the technical panels and added focused technical tutorials, high level discussion groups, exciting keynotes and more. LEARN MORE AND REGISTER TODAY! For complete program details please visit: propulsionenergy.aiaa.org FEATURES | April 2018 MORE AT aerospaceamerica.aiaa.org 20 34 40 24 Returning to Launching the Laying down the What next the moon Europa Clipper rules for space Senior research scientist NASA, Congress and We asked experts in for WFIRST? and former astronaut the White House are space policy to comment Tom Jones writes about debating which rocket on proposed United NASA’s three upcoming space what it would take to should send the probe Nations guidelines deliver the funds and into orbit close to this for countries and telescopes are meant to piece together political support for the Jovian moon. companies sending some heady puzzles, but the White Lunar Orbital Outpost- satellites and other craft House’s 2019 budget proposal would Gateway.
    [Show full text]
  • 액체로켓 메탄엔진 개발동향 및 시사점 Development Trends of Liquid
    Journal of the Korean Society of Propulsion Engineers Vol. 25, No. 2, pp. 119-143, 2021 119 Technical Paper DOI: https://doi.org/10.6108/KSPE.2021.25.2.119 액체로켓 메탄엔진 개발동향 및 시사점 임병직 a, * ㆍ 김철웅 a⋅ 이금오 a ㆍ 이기주 a ㆍ 박재성 a ㆍ 안규복 b ㆍ 남궁혁준 c ㆍ 윤영빈 d Development Trends of Liquid Methane Rocket Engine and Implications Byoungjik Lim a, * ㆍ Cheulwoong Kim a⋅ Keum-Oh Lee a ㆍ Keejoo Lee a ㆍ Jaesung Park a ㆍ Kyubok Ahn b ㆍ Hyuck-Joon Namkoung c ㆍ Youngbin Yoon d a Future Launcher R&D Program Office, Korea Aerospace Research Institute, Korea b School of Mechanical Engineering, Chungbuk National University, Korea c Guided Munitions Team, Hyundai Rotem, Korea d Department of Aerospace Engineering, Seoul National University, Korea * Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected] ABSTRACT Selecting liquid methane as fuel is a prevailing trend for recent rocket engine developments around the world, triggered by its affordability, reusability, storability for deep space exploration, and prospect for in-situ resource utilization. Given years of time required for acquiring a new rocket engine, a national-level R&D program to develop a methane engine is highly desirable at the earliest opportunity in order to catch up with this worldwide trend towards reusing launch vehicles for competitiveness and mission flexibility. In light of the monumental cost associated with development, fabrication, and testing of a booster stage engine, it is strategically a prudent choice to start with a low-thrust engine and build up space application cases.
    [Show full text]
  • Master's Thesis
    MASTER'S THESIS On-Orbit Servicing Satellite Docking Mechanism Modeling and Simulation Karim Bondoky 2015 Master of Science (120 credits) Space Engineering - Space Master Luleå University of Technology Department of Computer Science, Electrical and Space Engineering On-Orbit Servicing Satellite Docking Mechanism Modeling and Simulation by Karim Bondoky A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment for the degree of Masters of Science in Space Science and Technology Supervisors: Eng. Sebastian Schwarz Airbus Defence and Space Prof. Dr. Sergio Montenegro University of W¨urzburg Dr. Johnny Ejemalm Lule˚aUniversity of Technology October 2014 Declaration of Authorship I, Karim Bondoky, declare that this thesis titled, `On-Orbit Servicing Satellite Docking Mechanism Modeling and Simulation' and the work presented in it are my own. I confirm that: This work was done wholly while in candidature for a research degree at both Universities. Where any part of this thesis has previously been submitted for a degree or any other qualification, this has been clearly stated. Where I have consulted the published work of others, this is always clearly at- tributed. Where I have quoted from the work of others, the source is always given. With the exception of such quotations, this thesis is entirely my own work. I have acknowledged all main sources of help. Signed: Date: 15.10.2014 i Abstract Docking mechanism of two spacecraft is considered as one of the main challenging as- pects of an on-orbit servicing mission. This thesis presents the modeling, analysis and software simulation of one of the docking mechanisms called "probe and drogue". The aim of this thesis is to model the docking mechanism, simulate the docking process and use the results as a reference for the Hardware-In-the-Loop simulation (HIL) of the docking mechanism, in order to verify and validate it.
    [Show full text]
  • Forever Remembered
    July 2015 Vol. 2 No. 7 National Aeronautics and Space Administration KENNEDY SPACE CENTER’S magazine FOREVER REMEMBERED Earth Solar Aeronautics Mars Technology Right ISS System & Research Now Beyond NASA’S National Aeronautics and Space Administration LAUNCH KENNEDY SPACE CENTER’S SCHEDULE SPACEPORT MAGAZINE Date: July 3, 12:55 a.m. EDT Mission: Progress 60P Cargo Craft CONTENTS Description: In early July, the Progress 60P resupply vehicle — 4 �������������������Solemn shuttle exhibit shares enduring lessons an automated, unpiloted version of the Soyuz spacecraft that is used to ����������������Flyby will provide best ever view of Pluto 10 bring supplies and fuel — launches 14 ����������������New Horizons spacecraft hones in on Pluto to the International Space Station. http://go.nasa.gov/1HUAYbO 24 ����������������Firing Room 4 used for RESOLVE mission simulation Date: July 22, 5:02 p.m. EDT 28 ����������������SpaceX, NASA will rebound from CRS-7 loss Mission: Expedition 44 Launch to 29 ����������������Backup docking adapter to replace lost IDA-1 the ISS Description: In late July, Kjell SHUN FUJIMURA 31 ����������������Thermal Protection System Facility keeping up Lindgren of NASA, Kimiya Yui of JAXA and Oleg Kononenko of am an education specialist in the Education Projects and 35 ����������������New crew access tower takes shape at Cape Roscosmos launch aboard a Soyuz I Youth Engagement Office. I work to inspire students to pursue science, technology, engineering, mathematics, or 36 ����������������Innovative thinking converts repair site into garden spacecraft from the Baikonur Cosmodrome, Kazakhstan to the STEM, careers and with teachers to better integrate STEM 38 ����������������Proposals in for new class of launch services space station.
    [Show full text]
  • Periodic Habitability in Northern Plains Ground Ice: the Icebreaker Life Mission Plan
    Astrobiology Science Conference 2017 (LPI Contrib. No. 1965) 3478.pdf PERIODIC HABITABILITY IN NORTHERN PLAINS GROUND ICE: THE ICEBREAKER LIFE MISSION PLAN. C. Stoker1, C. McKay1, A. Davila1 , B. Glass2, V. Parro3, 1 Space Science Division, NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field CA, 2Exploration Technology Division, NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field CA, 3Centro de Astrobiología (INTA-CSIC), Madrid, Spain Introduction:The results from the 2008 Phoenix and future proposals are planned. The mission returns mission that sampled ground ice at 68oN latitude, along to the well-characterized Phoenix landing site with a with climate modeling studies, indicate that the high N. payload designed to address the following science latitude ice-rich regolith at low elevations is likely to goals: (1) search for biomolecular evidence of life; (2) be a recently habitable place on Mars [1]. search for organic matter from either exogeneous or Habitable Conditions Evidence: Ice was found endogeneous sources using methods that are not within 3-5 cm of the surface. If warmer conditions spoiled by the presence of perchlorate; (3) characterize occur, the ice could provide a source of liquid water. oxidative species that produced reactivity of soils seen Phoenix found evidence for liquid water processes by Viking; and 4) assess the habitability of the ice including 1) beneath 3 -5 cm of dry soil, segregated bearing soils. The Icebreaker Life payload hosts a 1-m pure ice was discovered in patches covering 10% of drill that brings cuttings samples to the surface where the area explored, 2) calcite mineral was detected in they are delivered to three instruments.
    [Show full text]
  • Orbital Fueling Architectures Leveraging Commercial Launch Vehicles for More Affordable Human Exploration
    ORBITAL FUELING ARCHITECTURES LEVERAGING COMMERCIAL LAUNCH VEHICLES FOR MORE AFFORDABLE HUMAN EXPLORATION by DANIEL J TIFFIN Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of: Master of Science Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY January, 2020 CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF GRADUATE STUDIES We hereby approve the thesis of DANIEL JOSEPH TIFFIN Candidate for the degree of Master of Science*. Committee Chair Paul Barnhart, PhD Committee Member Sunniva Collins, PhD Committee Member Yasuhiro Kamotani, PhD Date of Defense 21 November, 2019 *We also certify that written approval has been obtained for any proprietary material contained therein. 2 Table of Contents List of Tables................................................................................................................... 5 List of Figures ................................................................................................................. 6 List of Abbreviations ....................................................................................................... 8 1. Introduction and Background.................................................................................. 14 1.1 Human Exploration Campaigns ....................................................................... 21 1.1.1. Previous Mars Architectures ..................................................................... 21 1.1.2. Latest Mars Architecture .........................................................................
    [Show full text]