DOCSLIB.ORG

Kingdom Protista Protista and the Origin of Metazoans Protista Defy Tidy Definition

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Kingdom Protista Protista and the Origin of Metazoans Protista Defy Tidy Definition SEM of Paramecium Explain, in the context of evolution, why there is more higher order diversity (e.g. phyla) in the ocean but a greater species diversity on land. Kingdom Protista (Based on Textbook Chapter 3) Protista and the Origin of Metazoans Protista Defy Tidy Definition: Goals: Introduction - >10 phyla, believed by Review characteristics of single I. Body Plan some that they should be cell body plan classified as Kingdoms A. S.A./Volume Constraint Explore the limitations of life B. Reynolds number as a single cell - Among them are the II. Important Protists ancestors of multicell Learn some of the ways in which protists are important A. In food webs organisms including B. Agents of disease Evaluate evidence for the origin animals. of animals from protist ancestors III. Origin of Metazoans Evidence for colonial origin and metazoan ancestors Body plan characterized by: Most Common TYPES of Protista: Ciliates (Phylum Ciliophora): externally ciliated A. Unicellularity (most) B. Small Size (< 5-250 µm) Sarcodinids: 4 phyla of amoeboid types C. Lacking Organ Systems (Amoebas, foramenifera, radiozoans, heliozoans) (including a nervous system) Flagellates: several phyla of flagella-bearing types, including many photosynthetic forms and Each individual is a cell that is Some important parasitic forms functionally more versatile than any single cell from a multicell organism Spore-Formers: Phylum Apicomplexa and other very important parasitic forms 1 Means of locomotion and associated structures are no longer Kingdom Protozoa considered key characters in establishing the phylongeny (evolutionary relatedness) of Protista. Phylogeny is Complicated/Unresolved Alveolate Amoeboid Flagellated Protozoa Paramecium Protozoa Protozoa Ciliates EUGLENOZOA foramenifera PH CILIOPHORA dinoflagellate GRANULORETICULOSA trypanosomes (ciliates) (foramenifera) euglinids Euglenoid RADIOZOA DINOZOA trichomonads (dinoflagellates) (radiolarians) Giardia APICOMPLEXA ACANTHARIA (coccidians (actinarians) e.g. Plasmodium) Didinium HELIOZOA Amoeboid Flagellated (heliozoans) See pie chart ad taxonomic detail on pg 75 Protista and the Origin of Metazoans I. Protistan Body Plan is Characterized by Introduction -- Primarily unicellular I. Body Plan -- Small, 5 -300 µm A. S.A./Volume Constraint -- Lack organs B. Reynolds number (Lack a nervous system) II. Important Protists A. In food webs B. Agents of disease What constraints does the small unicellular body plan impose on the biology of protistans? III. Origin of Metazoans Evidence for colonial origin and metazoan ancestors S.A./Vol relationship imposes a limit on cell size As a cell increases in size, exchange with the environment Some Amebas becomes more difficult partly solve 1 this problem Inch L Surface Area ~ L2 (2.5 cm) Volume ~ L3 Therefore S.A./V declines L as L increases Cytoplasmic streaming provides continuous mixing or circulation of the cytosol 2 Small Size also affects scaling of physical forces Re = velocity x length of the organism Viscocity of Medium Balance of inertia and drag When Re is high, drag is relatively negligible on a moving organism (example, Re is 30,000 for a dragonfly in flight) Depends on the size and velocity of the organism When Re is low, drag forces dominate movement and on the viscocity of the medium. (example, Re for a protist could be <0.1) Expressed as Reynolds Number (Re) Re = velocity x length of the organism In what way would low Reynolds Viscocity of Medium numbers affect the ecology of protists? Re = vel x L Vis Re = velocity x length of the organism Viscocity of Medium What is life like at Low Reynolds numbers?? -- no inertia -- force of gravity balanced by viscocity -- yet ciliates travel 2 mm per sec. (8 body lengths) -- feeding also affected Vorticella feeding Re = vel x L I. Protistan Body Plan is Characterized by Vis -- Primarily unicellular -- Small, 5 -300 µm Viscous forces can -- Lack organs also be important in (Lack a nervous system) air but the medium is not very dense what conditions will What constraints does the small unicellular produce a low Re??? body plan impose on the biology of protistans? Midge 3 Anterior Organelles are the Food functional equivalents of vacuole organs. Oral nuclei groove Organelles not generally found in metazoans Cyto- - contractile vacuoles stome - trichocysts - toxicysts Fig 3.19 contractile Posterior http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hSFJ- Paramecium Feeding vacuole Contraction spnn6c&NR=1 II. Importance of Protozoa Spasmin filaments The spasmoneme is a biological A. Major role in ecosystems as decomposers, food source for spring organelle. Contraction is metazoans completed in 2 ms at speeds up to 8 cm/sec and is triggered B. Responsible for a large number of human ailments, including by Ca++ activated interactions malaria, dysentery, sleeping sickness along the length of the supramolecular structure. The reaction does not require ATP C. Provided biologists with outstanding material for genetic, physiological and other studies. Protista and the Origin of Metazoans Metazoa arose from Protozoa sometime Introduction before the Cambrian 1200-600 mya I. Body Plan Which protozoan group was the ancestor?? A. S.A./Volume Constraint B. Reynolds number By what process was first metazoan formed?? II. Important Protists A. In food webs Are metazoans Monophyletic or Polyphyletic?? B. Agents of disease III. Origin of Metazoans What were the first Metazoans like?? Evidence for colonial origin and metazoan ancestors CAN WE EVER REALLY KNOW?? 4 3 Phyla are Possible Candidates as Basal Group of all Animals What is a “metazoan”?? Eukaryotic and multicellular Cell differentiation and coordination; more than a colony or aggregation of cells Cnidarians Layers of cells organized into “tissues” Sponges Embryonic development; gastrulation Flatworms Symbiotic Hypothesis Theoretically 3 ways in which a multicellular Colonial Hypothesis organism could evolve from a protist. Cellularization Hypothesis Strengths: Origin of Eukaryotes from prokaryotes Weakness: Genetic obstacles to reproduction. How do they integrate into a reproducing organism? Cellularization Stained Paramecium showing multiple ”inclusions” Macronucleus Strengths: Paramecium-flatworms are similar Weaknesses: no evidence of “compartmentalization” :flatworms with complex embryology :What about Cnidaria, Sponges ?? 5 Similarities of Choanocytes (sponge cells) and choanoflagellates (protozoan) (Haeckle’s favorite) Blastea Gastrea Strengths: models exist (Volvox, choanoflag.) : parallels animal embryology Weaknesses: ??? Choanocyte Choanoflagellate Model organization Eudorina Pandorina Choanoflagellates live as solitary and colonial forms Volvox Genetic Evidence (18S r-DNA) Opisthokonts share: uniflagellate (reproductive) stages with flagellum at the posterior Mitochondria with flattened, plate-like cristae 6 Based on sequence analyses of 5 proteins Monosiga has 86% sequence homology with animals. a. Phylogeny based on protein domain comparisons b-d. choanoflagellate cells bear a single Flagellum and an apical collar of actin- filled microvilli (bracket, c). D. an overlay of b-tubulin (reen), polymerized Mol. Biol. Evol. actin (red) and DNA (blue) localization 23: 93-106 2006 reveals the position of the flagellum within the collar of microvilli. Conclusions on Metazoan Origin Evidence best supports the colonial theory Choanoflagellate group is most likely ancestor; Evidence includes cell structure and genetic similarities Idea that metazoans are monophyletic is supported 7 .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Basal Body Structure and Composition in the Apicomplexans Toxoplasma and Plasmodium Maria E
    Francia et al. Cilia (2016) 5:3 DOI 10.1186/s13630-016-0025-5 Cilia REVIEW Open Access Basal body structure and composition in the apicomplexans Toxoplasma and Plasmodium Maria E. Francia1* , Jean‑Francois Dubremetz2 and Naomi S. Morrissette3 Abstract The phylum Apicomplexa encompasses numerous important human and animal disease-causing parasites, includ‑ ing the Plasmodium species, and Toxoplasma gondii, causative agents of malaria and toxoplasmosis, respectively. Apicomplexans proliferate by asexual replication and can also undergo sexual recombination. Most life cycle stages of the parasite lack flagella; these structures only appear on male gametes. Although male gametes (microgametes) assemble a typical 9 2 axoneme, the structure of the templating basal body is poorly defined. Moreover, the rela‑ tionship between asexual+ stage centrioles and microgamete basal bodies remains unclear. While asexual stages of Plasmodium lack defined centriole structures, the asexual stages of Toxoplasma and closely related coccidian api‑ complexans contain centrioles that consist of nine singlet microtubules and a central tubule. There are relatively few ultra-structural images of Toxoplasma microgametes, which only develop in cat intestinal epithelium. Only a subset of these include sections through the basal body: to date, none have unambiguously captured organization of the basal body structure. Moreover, it is unclear whether this basal body is derived from pre-existing asexual stage centrioles or is synthesized de novo. Basal bodies in Plasmodium microgametes are thought to be synthesized de novo, and their assembly remains ill-defined. Apicomplexan genomes harbor genes encoding δ- and ε-tubulin homologs, potentially enabling these parasites to assemble a typical triplet basal body structure.
    [Show full text]
  • Molecular Data and the Evolutionary History of Dinoflagellates by Juan Fernando Saldarriaga Echavarria Diplom, Ruprecht-Karls-Un
    Molecular data and the evolutionary history of dinoflagellates by Juan Fernando Saldarriaga Echavarria Diplom, Ruprecht-Karls-Universitat Heidelberg, 1993 A THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in THE FACULTY OF GRADUATE STUDIES Department of Botany We accept this thesis as conforming to the required standard THE UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA November 2003 © Juan Fernando Saldarriaga Echavarria, 2003 ABSTRACT New sequences of ribosomal and protein genes were combined with available morphological and paleontological data to produce a phylogenetic framework for dinoflagellates. The evolutionary history of some of the major morphological features of the group was then investigated in the light of that framework. Phylogenetic trees of dinoflagellates based on the small subunit ribosomal RNA gene (SSU) are generally poorly resolved but include many well- supported clades, and while combined analyses of SSU and LSU (large subunit ribosomal RNA) improve the support for several nodes, they are still generally unsatisfactory. Protein-gene based trees lack the degree of species representation necessary for meaningful in-group phylogenetic analyses, but do provide important insights to the phylogenetic position of dinoflagellates as a whole and on the identity of their close relatives. Molecular data agree with paleontology in suggesting an early evolutionary radiation of the group, but whereas paleontological data include only taxa with fossilizable cysts, the new data examined here establish that this radiation event included all dinokaryotic lineages, including athecate forms. Plastids were lost and replaced many times in dinoflagellates, a situation entirely unique for this group. Histones could well have been lost earlier in the lineage than previously assumed.
    [Show full text]
  • Activity-Release-Form-KLCC
    Kingdom Life Community Church Activity Release Form For those 18 years of age or older, all parents, and all guardians: I consent for any of my children listed below to participate in any activity or trip sponsored by Kingdom Life Community Church. In case of medical need or injury, I authorize the church to arrange for medical or dental services for me and any of my children listed below. I agree that any such expense will be my obligation. I, individually, or in my capacities as parent or guardian of the below listed children, waive, release, and indemnify the church and all of its agents, directors, officers, employees and volunteers (collectively, “released parties”) from all demands, claims, liability, in law or in equity, that have arisen or may arise from any church activity or trip and that involve any damage, loss, or injury to me, my spouse, any of my children, my property, or the property of any of my children. In the same capacities, I promise not to sue any of the released parties for any such demands, claims, or liability. This waiver, release, indemnification, and promise not to sue do not apply to claims of criminal conduct or gross negligence. I understand that the church may take photographs of me and my family in the course of its activities, and I grant the church permission to publish such photographs in a manner the church deems appropriate. This activity release form is in effect for any activities that I, or any of my children, may participate in. This form is revocable, prospectively only, by a writing signed by me that bears the date that the revocation is delivered to the church.
    [Show full text]
  • Buzzle – Zoology Terms – Glossary of Biology Terms and Definitions Http
    Buzzle – Zoology Terms – Glossary of Biology Terms and Definitions http://www.buzzle.com/articles/biology-terms-glossary-of-biology-terms-and- definitions.html#ZoologyGlossary Biology is the branch of science concerned with the study of life: structure, growth, functioning and evolution of living things. This discipline of science comprises three sub-disciplines that are botany (study of plants), Zoology (study of animals) and Microbiology (study of microorganisms). This vast subject of science involves the usage of myriads of biology terms, which are essential to be comprehended correctly. People involved in the science field encounter innumerable jargons during their study, research or work. Moreover, since science is a part of everybody's life, it is something that is important to all individuals. A Abdomen: Abdomen in mammals is the portion of the body which is located below the rib cage, and in arthropods below the thorax. It is the cavity that contains stomach, intestines, etc. Abscission: Abscission is a process of shedding or separating part of an organism from the rest of it. Common examples are that of, plant parts like leaves, fruits, flowers and bark being separated from the plant. Accidental: Accidental refers to the occurrences or existence of all those species that would not be found in a particular region under normal circumstances. Acclimation: Acclimation refers to the morphological and/or physiological changes experienced by various organisms to adapt or accustom themselves to a new climate or environment. Active Transport: The movement of cellular substances like ions or molecules by traveling across the membrane, towards a higher level of concentration while consuming energy.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Lessons from Simple Marine Models on the Bacterial Regulation
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/211797; this version posted October 31, 2017. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. Lessons from simple marine models on the bacterial regulation of eukaryotic development Arielle Woznicaa and Nicole Kinga,1 a Howard Hughes Medical Institute and Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720, United States 1 Corresponding author, [email protected]. 1 bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/211797; this version posted October 31, 2017. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. 1 Highlights 2 - Cues from environmental bacteria influence the development of many marine 3 eukaryotes 4 5 - The molecular cues produced by environmental bacteria are structurally diverse 6 7 - Eukaryotes can respond to many different environmental bacteria 8 9 - Some environmental bacteria act as “information hubs” for diverse eukaryotes 10 11 - Experimentally tractable systems, like the choanoflagellate S. rosetta, promise to 12 reveal molecular mechanisms underlying these interactions 13 14 Abstract 15 Molecular cues from environmental bacteria influence important developmental 16 decisions in diverse marine eukaryotes. Yet, relatively little is understood about the 17 mechanisms underlying these interactions, in part because marine ecosystems are 18 dynamic and complex.
    [Show full text]
  • Antony Van Leeuwenhoek, the Father of Microscope
    Turkish Journal of Biochemistry – Türk Biyokimya Dergisi 2016; 41(1): 58–62 Education Sector Letter to the Editor – 93585 Emine Elif Vatanoğlu-Lutz*, Ahmet Doğan Ataman Medicine in philately: Antony Van Leeuwenhoek, the father of microscope Pullardaki tıp: Antony Van Leeuwenhoek, mikroskobun kaşifi DOI 10.1515/tjb-2016-0010 only one lens to look at blood, insects and many other Received September 16, 2015; accepted December 1, 2015 objects. He was first to describe cells and bacteria, seen through his very small microscopes with, for his time, The origin of the word microscope comes from two Greek extremely good lenses (Figure 1) [3]. words, “uikpos,” small and “okottew,” view. It has been After van Leeuwenhoek’s contribution,there were big known for over 2000 years that glass bends light. In the steps in the world of microscopes. Several technical inno- 2nd century BC, Claudius Ptolemy described a stick appear- vations made microscopes better and easier to handle, ing to bend in a pool of water, and accurately recorded the which led to microscopy becoming more and more popular angles to within half a degree. He then very accurately among scientists. An important discovery was that lenses calculated the refraction constant of water. During the combining two types of glass could reduce the chromatic 1st century,around year 100, glass had been invented and effect, with its disturbing halos resulting from differences the Romans were looking through the glass and testing in refraction of light (Figure 2) [4]. it. They experimented with different shapes of clear glass In 1830, Joseph Jackson Lister reduced the problem and one of their samples was thick in the middle and thin with spherical aberration by showing that several weak on the edges [1].
    [Show full text]
  • Eukaryotic Microorganisms Algae and Protozoans 2
    Eukaryotic Microorganisms Algae and Protozoans 2 Eukaryotic Microorganisms . prominent members of ecosystems . useful as model systems and industry . some are major human pathogens . two groups . protists . fungi 3 Kingdom Protista . Algae - eukaryotic organisms, usually unicellular and colonial, that photosynthesize with chlorophyll a . Protozoa - unicellular eukaryotes that lack tissues and share similarities in cell structure, nutrition, life cycle, and biochemistry 4 Algae .Photosynthetic organisms .Microscopic forms are unicellular, colonial, filamentous .Macroscopic forms are colonial and multicellular .Contain chloroplasts with chlorophyll and other pigments .Cell wall .May or may not have flagella 5 6 Algae .Most are free-living in fresh and marine water – plankton .Provide basis of food web in most aquatic habitats .Produce large proportion of atmospheric O2 .Dinoflagellates can cause red tides and give off toxins that cause food poisoning with neurological symptoms .Classified according to types of pigments and cell wall .Used for cosmetics, food, and medical products 7 Protozoa Protozoa 9 .Diverse group of 65,000 species .Vary in shape, lack a cell wall .Most are unicellular; colonies are rare .Most are harmless, free-living in a moist habitat .Some are animal parasites and can be spread by insect vectors .All are heterotrophic – lack chloroplasts .Cytoplasm divided into ectoplasm and endoplasm .Feed by engulfing other microbes and organic matter Protozoa 10 .Most have locomotor structures – flagella, cilia, or pseudopods .Exist as trophozoite – motile feeding stage .Many can enter into a dormant resting stage when conditions are unfavorable for growth and feeding – cyst .All reproduce asexually, mitosis or multiple fission; many also reproduce sexually – conjugation Figure 5.27 11 Protozoan Identification 12 .
    [Show full text]
  • 28-Protistsf20r.Ppt [Compatibility Mode]
    9/3/20 Ch 28: The Protists (a.k.a. Protoctists) (meet these in more detail in your book and lab) 1 Protists invent: eukaryotic cells size complexity Remember: 1°(primary) endosymbiosis? -> mitochondrion -> chloroplast genome unicellular -> multicellular 2 1 9/3/20 For chloroplasts 2° (secondary) happened (more complicated) {3°(tertiary) happened too} 3 4 Eukaryotic “supergroups” (SG; between K and P) 4 2 9/3/20 Protists invent sex: meiosis and fertilization -> 3 Life Cycles/Histories (Fig 13.6) Spores and some protists (Humans do this one) 5 “Algae” Group PS Pigments Euglenoids chl a & b (& carotenoids) Dinoflagellates chl a & c (usually) (& carotenoids) Diatoms chl a & c (& carotenoids) Xanthophytes chl a & c (& carotenoids) Chrysophytes chl a & c (& carotenoids) Coccolithophorids chl a & c (& carotenoids) Browns chl a & c (& carotenoids) Reds chl a, phycobilins (& carotenoids) Greens chl a & b (& carotenoids) (more groups exist) 6 3 9/3/20 Name word roots (indicate nutrition) “algae” (-phyt-) protozoa (no consistent word ending) “fungal-like” (-myc-) Ecological terms plankton phytoplankton zooplankton 7 SG: Excavata/Excavates “excavated” feeding groove some have reduced mitochondria (e.g.: mitosomes, hydrogenosomes) 8 4 9/3/20 SG: Excavata O: Diplomonads: †Giardia Cl: Parabasalids: Trichonympha (bk only) †Trichomonas P: Euglenophyta/zoa C: Kinetoplastids = trypanosomes/hemoflagellates: †Trypanosoma C: Euglenids: Euglena 9 SG: “SAR” clade: Clade Alveolates cell membrane 10 5 9/3/20 SG: “SAR” clade: Clade Alveolates P: Dinoflagellata/Pyrrophyta:
    [Show full text]
  • There Is Not a Latin Root Word Clear Your Desk Protist Quiz Grade Quiz
    There is not a Latin Root Word Clear your desk Protist Quiz Grade Quiz Malaria Fever Wars Classification Kingdom Protista contains THREE main groups of organisms: 1. Protozoa: “animal-like protists” 2. Algae: “plant-like protists” 3. Slime & Water Molds: “fungus-like protists” Basics of Protozoa Unicellular Eukaryotic unlike bacteria 65, 000 different species Heterotrophic Free-living (move in aquatic environments) or Parasitic Habitats include oceans, rivers, ponds, soil, and other organisms. Protozoa Reproduction ALL protozoa can use asexual reproduction through binary fission or multiple fission FEW protozoa reproduce sexually through conjugation. Adaptation Special Protozoa Adaptations Eyespot: detects changes in the quantity/ quality of light, and physical/chemical changes in their environment Cyst: hardened external covering that protects protozoa in extreme environments. Basics of Algae: “Plant-like” protists. MOST unicellular; SOME multicellular. Make food by photosynthesis (“autotrophic prostists”). Were classified as plants, BUT… – Lack tissue differentiation- NO roots, stems, leaves, etc. – Reproduce differently Most algal cells have pyrenoids (organelles that make and store starch) Can use asexual or sexual reproduction. Algae Structure: Thallus: body portion; usually haploid Body Structure: 1) unicellular: single-celled; aquatic (Ex.phytoplankton, Chlamydomonas) 2) colonial: groups of coordinated cells; “division of labor” (Ex. Volvox) 3) filamentous: rod-shaped thallus; some anchor to ocean bottom (Ex. Spyrogyra) 4) multicellular: large, complex, leaflike thallus (Ex. Macrocystis- giant kelp) Basics of Fungus-like Protists: Slime Molds: Water Molds: Once classified as fungi Fungus-like; composed of Found in damp soil, branching filaments rotting logs, and other Commonly freshwater; decaying matter. some in soil; some Some white, most yellow parasites.
    [Show full text]
  • Wrc Research Report No. 131 Effects of Feedlot Runoff
    WRC RESEARCH REPORT NO. 131 EFFECTS OF FEEDLOT RUNOFF ON FREE-LIVING AQUATIC CILIATED PROTOZOA BY Kenneth S. Todd, Jr. College of Veterinary Medicine Department of Veterinary Pathology and Hygiene University of Illinois Urbana, Illinois 61801 FINAL REPORT PROJECT NO. A-074-ILL This project was partially supported by the U. S. ~epartmentof the Interior in accordance with the Water Resources Research Act of 1964, P .L. 88-379, Agreement No. 14-31-0001-7030. UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS WATER RESOURCES CENTER 2535 Hydrosystems Laboratory Urbana, Illinois 61801 AUGUST 1977 ABSTRACT Water samples and free-living and sessite ciliated protozoa were col- lected at various distances above and below a stream that received runoff from a feedlot. No correlation was found between the species of protozoa recovered, water chemistry, location in the stream, or time of collection. Kenneth S. Todd, Jr'. EFFECTS OF FEEDLOT RUNOFF ON FREE-LIVING AQUATIC CILIATED PROTOZOA Final Report Project A-074-ILL, Office of Water Resources Research, Department of the Interior, August 1977, Washington, D.C., 13 p. KEYWORDS--*ciliated protozoa/feed lots runoff/*water pollution/water chemistry/Illinois/surface water INTRODUCTION The current trend for feeding livestock in the United States is toward large confinement types of operation. Most of these large commercial feedlots have some means of manure disposal and programs to prevent runoff from feed- lots from reaching streams. However, there are still large numbers of smaller feedlots, many of which do not have adequate facilities for disposal of manure or preventing runoff from reaching waterways. The production of wastes by domestic animals was often not considered in the past, but management of wastes is currently one of the largest problems facing the livestock industry.
    [Show full text]
  • An Evolutionary Switch in the Specificity of an Endosomal CORVET Tether Underlies
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/210328; this version posted October 27, 2017. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. Title: An evolutionary switch in the specificity of an endosomal CORVET tether underlies formation of regulated secretory vesicles in the ciliate Tetrahymena thermophila Daniela Sparvolia, Elisabeth Richardsonb*, Hiroko Osakadac*, Xun Land,e*, Masaaki Iwamotoc, Grant R. Bowmana,f, Cassandra Kontura,g, William A. Bourlandh, Denis H. Lynni,j, Jonathan K. Pritchardd,e,k, Tokuko Haraguchic,l, Joel B. Dacksb, and Aaron P. Turkewitza th a Department of Molecular Genetics and Cell Biology, The University of Chicago, 920 E 58 Street, Chicago IL USA b Department of Cell Biology, University of Alberta, Canada c Advanced ICT Research Institute, National Institute of Information and Communications Technology (NICT), Kobe 651-2492, Japan. d Department of Genetics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, 94305 e Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305 f current affiliation: Department of Molecular Biology, University of Wyoming, Laramie g current affiliation: Department of Genetics, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06510 h Department of Biological Sciences, Boise State University, Boise ID 83725-1515 I Department of Integrative Biology, University of Guelph, Guelph ON N1G 2W1, Canada j current affiliation: Department of Zoology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z4, Canada k Department of Biology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, 94305 l Graduate School of Frontier Biosciences, Osaka University, Suita 565-0871, Japan.
    [Show full text]
  • Bacterial Cues Regulate Multicellular Development and Mating in the Choanoflagellate, S
    Bacterial cues regulate multicellular development and mating in the choanoflagellate, S. rosetta By Arielle Woznica A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Molecular and Cell Biology in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in charge: Professor Nicole King, Chair Professor Russell Vance Professor Diana Bautista Professor Brian Staskawicz Spring 2017 Abstract Bacterial cues regulate multicellular development and mating in the choanoflagellate, S. rosetta By Arielle Woznica Doctor of Philosophy in Molecular and Cell Biology University of California, Berkeley Professor Nicole King, Chair Animals first diverged from their unicellular ancestors in oceans dominated by bacteria, and have lived in close association with bacteria ever since. Interactions with bacteria critically shape diverse aspects of animal biology today, including developmental processes that were long thought to be autonomous. Yet, the multicellularity of animals and the often-complex communities of bacteria with which they are associated make it challenging to characterize the mechanisms underlying many bacterial-animal interactions. Thus, developing experimentally tractable host-microbe model systems will be essential for revealing the molecules and mechanisms by which bacteria influence animal development. The choanoflagellate Salpingoeca rosetta, one of the closest living relatives of animals, has emerged as an attractive model for studying host-microbe interactions. Like all choanoflagellates, S. rosetta feeds on bacteria; however, we have found that interactions between S. rosetta and bacteria extend beyond those of predator and prey. In fact, two key transitions in the life history of S. rosetta, multicellular “rosette” development and sexual reproduction, are regulated by environmental bacteria.
    [Show full text]