DOCSLIB.ORG

Strategija Upravljanja Vodama F Bih I Dio Nacrt

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Strategija Upravljanja Vodama F Bih I Dio Nacrt Bosnia and Herzegovina Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina Federal Ministry of Agriculture, Water Management and Forestry The Sava River Basin District Agency, Sarajevo The Adriatic Sea River Basin District, Mostar WATER MANAGEMENT STRATEGY OF THE FEDERATION OF BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA (DRAFT) Društvo za istraživanje, studije, projektiranje i konzalting Zavod za vodoprivredu d.o.o. Mostar Sarajevo, April 2010 Zavod za vodoprivredu d.d. Sarajevo Zavod za vodoprivredu d.o.o. Mostar WATER MANAGEMENT STRATEGY OF THE FEDERATION OF BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA (DRAFT) Elaborated by: Project Leader: Adnan Bijedić, B.Sc. Fields of expertise: Water Legislation: Prof. Dr. Slavko Bogdanović, B.Sc. (Law). Economy: Prof. Dr. Kasim Tatić, B.Sc. (Econ.) Water Use: Indira Sulejmanagić, B. Sc. Water Protection: Haris Ališehović, B.Sc. Protection against Water: Ćamila Ademović, B.Sc. Hydrologic Analyses – Water Balance: Nino Rimac, B.Sc. Hydrogeology: Dr. Hazim Hrvatović, B.Sc. Water Quality – Biological Indicators: Dr. Sadbera Trožić-Borovac, B.Sc. (Biol.). Surface Vegetation: Dr. Izet Čengić, B.Sc. Use of Water for Irrigation: Federalni zavod za agropedologiju Sarajevo Director: Faruk Šabeta, B.Sc. Sarajevo, April 2010 2 Zavod za vodoprivredu d.d. Sarajevo Zavod za vodoprivredu d.o.o. Mostar April 2010. WATER MANAGEMENT STRATEGY OF THE FEDERATION OF BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA Water management Strategy of the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina (Draft) Table of Content: 1. Background Information on the Relevant Area ........................................................................9 1.1. Position, Social and Political Framework .................................................................................... 9 1.1.1. Basic Indicators........................................................................................................................................... 9 1.1.2. Population................................................................................................................................................. 10 1.1.2.1. Demographic Developments until 1991.......................................................................................... 11 1.1.2.2. Demographic Developments in the Period 1991-2007.................................................................... 11 1.2. Natural Characteristics ............................................................................................................... 15 1.2.1. General Indicators..................................................................................................................................... 15 1.2.2. Lithographic and Tectonic Features.......................................................................................................... 15 1.2.2.1. Neogene Basins in BiH Federation ................................................................................................. 19 1.2.2.2. Main Thrust Structures of the Dinarides ......................................................................................... 20 1.2.3. Forest Condition ....................................................................................................................................... 21 1.2.3.1. Forest Management in the Context of Water Protection ................................................................. 22 1.2.3.2. Forest Management in the Context of Protection against Erosions................................................. 25 1.2.4. Protected Areas......................................................................................................................................... 26 1.2.5. General Hydrographic Characteristics ...................................................................................................... 28 1.2.5.1. Sava River Basin District ................................................................................................................ 29 1.2.5.2. Adriatic River Basin District........................................................................................................... 32 1.2.6. Relief......................................................................................................................................................... 35 1.2.7. Climate...................................................................................................................................................... 36 2. Water Status ..............................................................................................................................39 2.1. Surface waters .............................................................................................................................. 39 2.1.1. General quantitative characteristics .......................................................................................................... 39 2.1.2. Spatial and time distribution ..................................................................................................................... 40 2.1.3. Surface water quantities............................................................................................................................ 41 2.1.3.1. The Sava RBD................................................................................................................................. 41 2.1.3.2. The Adriatic Sea RBD..................................................................................................................... 51 2.1.4. Balance of surface waters ......................................................................................................................... 58 2.1.4.1. The Sava river basin district............................................................................................................ 58 2.1.4.2. The Adriatic Sea basin district ........................................................................................................ 58 2.1.4.3. Aggregate balance of surface waters............................................................................................... 59 2.1.4.4. Assessment of inland water resources............................................................................................. 59 2.1.5. Quality of surface waters .......................................................................................................................... 60 2.1.5.1. Introduction ..................................................................................................................................... 60 2.1.5.2. Assessment of water quality status for the period up to 1991 ....................................................... 61 2.1.5.3. Assessment of water quality status for the period 2000,-2005,-2007.............................................. 61 2.1.5.3.1. The Sava river basin district....................................................................................................... 61 2.1.5.3.2. The Adriatic Sea river basin district........................................................................................... 66 2.1.5.4. Comparison of water quality results................................................................................................ 69 2.2. Groundwaters............................................................................................................................... 71 2.2.1. Hydrogeologic investigation degree ......................................................................................................... 71 2.2.2. Hydrogeologic regionalization.................................................................................................................. 71 2.2.3. Review of groundwater reservoirs with reserves balance......................................................................... 73 2.2.3.1. Locations, borders and characterization of groundwater bodies with balance of reserves.............. 73 2.2.4. Aggregate balance of groundwater reserves ............................................................................................. 75 2.2.4.1. Intergranular aquifers ...................................................................................................................... 75 2.2.4.2. Karst-fracture aquifers..................................................................................................................... 76 3 Zavod za vodoprivredu d.d. Sarajevo Zavod za vodoprivredu d.o.o. Mostar April 2010. WATER MANAGEMENT STRATEGY OF THE FEDERATION OF BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA 2.2.5. Mineral, thermal and thermo-mineral waters............................................................................................ 77 2.2.5.1. Basic data ........................................................................................................................................ 78 3. State of Affairs in the Area of Water Management.................................................................80 3.1. Water Management Legal Framework in Bosnia and Herzegovina and in the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina ........................................................................................................................... 80 3.1.1. Competences of Bosnia and Herzegovina................................................................................................. 80 3.1.2. Water Law of the Federation of BiH ........................................................................................................ 81 3.1.2.1. Background ....................................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Federal Republic of Yugoslavia
    Public Disclosure Authorized FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF YUGOSLAVIA BREAKING WITH THE PAST: THE PATH TO STABILITY AND GROWTH Volume II: Assistance Priorities and Public Disclosure Authorized Sectoral Analyses Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized ii TABLE OF CONTENTS ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS………………………………………………………...viii ACKNOWLEDGEMENT……………………………………………………………………….. ix CHAPTER 1. AN OVERVIEW OF THE ECONOMIC RECOVERY AND TRANSITION PROGRAM…………………………………………………………………………………….... 1 A. Introduction……………………………………………………………………………..... 1 B. The Government’s medium-term Challenges…………………………………………..... 3 C. Medium-term External Financing Requirements………………………………….……... 4 D. The 2001 Program………………………………………………………………………... 8 E. Implementing the Program………………………………………………………….…....13 CHAPTER 2. FISCAL POLICY AND MANAGEMENT………………….…………………..15 A. Reducing Quasi Fiscal Deficits and Hidden Risks…………………………………….. ..16 B. Transparency and Accountability of Public Spending………………….………………..27 C. Public Debt Management………………………………………………………………...34 D. Tax Policy and Administration…………………………………………….…………... ..39 CHAPTER 3. TRADE………………………………………...…………………….…………..48 A. Patterns of Trade in Goods and Services ……………………………..………..……… ..48 B. Trade Policies: Reforms to date and plans for the future………………………………...51 C. Capacity to Trade: Institutional and other constraints to implementation…………….....55 D. Market Access: The global, European and regional dimension……………………….. ..57 E. Policy recommendations………………………………………………………………....60 F. Donor Program……………………………………………………………….…………..62
    [Show full text]
  • IDF-Report 95 (2016)
    IDF International Dragonfly Fund Report Journal of the International Dragonfly Fund 1­25 Dejan Kulijer, Iva Miljević & Jelena Jakovljev Contribution of the participants of 4th Balkan Odonatological Meeting to the knowledge of Odonata distribution in Bosnia and Herzegovina Published 26.04.2016 95 ISSN 1435­3393 The International Dragonfly Fund (IDF) is a scientific society founded in 1996 for the impro­ vement of odonatological knowledge and the protection of species. Internet: http://www.dragonflyfund.org/ This series intends to publish studies promoted by IDF and to facilitate cost­efficient and ra­ pid dissemination of odonatological data.. Editorial Work: Milen Marinov, Geert de Knijf & Martin Schorr Layout: Martin Schorr IDF­home page: Holger Hunger Indexed: Zoological Record, Thomson Reuters, UK Printing: Colour Connection GmbH, Frankfurt Impressum: Publisher: International Dragonfly Fund e.V., Schulstr. 7B, 54314 Zerf, Germany. E­mail: [email protected] Responsible editor: Martin Schorr Cover picture: Cordulegaster heros Photographer: Falk Petzold Published 26.04.2016 Contribution of the participants of 4th Balkan Odonatological Meeting to the knowledge of Odonata distribution in Bosnia and Herzegovina Dejan Kulijer1, Iva Miljević2 & Jelena Jakovljev3 1National Museum of Bosnia and Herzegovina, Zmaja od Bosne 3, 71000 Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina. E­mail: [email protected] 2Center for Environment, Cara Lazara 24, 78 000 Banja Luka, Bosnia and Herzegovina. E­mail: [email protected] 3Univesity of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Baumgasse 58/19 1030 Vienna, Austria. E­mail: [email protected] Abstract As a result of increased interest in dragonflies and close cooperation between odo­ natologists on the Balkan Peninsula, the Balkan Odonatological Meeting (BOOM) has been established in 2011.
    [Show full text]
  • Biodiversity of Herpetofauna of the Prenj and Čvrsnica Mts. (Bosnia and Herzegovina)
    Original Scientific Paper Hyla VOL. 2014., No. 2, Str. 4 - 19 Šunje et al. 2014 ISSN: 1848-2007 Biodiversity of herpetofauna of the Prenj and Čvrsnica Mts. (Bosnia and Herzegovina) Bioraznolikost herpetofaune planina Prenj i Čvrsnica (Bosna i Hercegovina) 1 1 1 1 1 1 EMINA ŠUNJE* , ADNAN ZIMIĆ , BORIS STJEPANOVIĆ , BENJAMIN JUSIĆ , MIRZA ČENGIĆ , MAJA BRADARIĆ , 1 SAUDIN MERDAN 1Herpetological Association in Bosnia and Hercegovina ATRA, Sarajevo, Bosnia and Hercegovina; *Corresponding author: [email protected] Abstract Herpetological research of the Prenj and Čvrsnica mountains has a relatively long tradition, but not enough scientific attention was devoted to them. Literature data on herpetofauna of Prenj and Čvrsnica is old, sporadic and rare. The aim of this research was to collect all data on the herpetofauna for the given mountains and determine the importance of the area for the herpetofaunal biodiversity of Bosnia and Herzegovina (B-H). The analysis of data showed that the area of Prenj and Čvrsnica is inhabited by 11 species of amphibians (55 % of the total number of amphibians in B-H) and 24 species of reptiles (83% of the total number of reptiles in B-H) which differ in vertical and horizontal distribution. The registered biodiversity is extremely high and is a consequence of the geographical position of these mountains which border the Mediterranean climate zone in B-H. Key words: distribution, submediterranean, amphibians, reptiles, biodiversity. Sažetak Herpetološka istraživanja planina Prenj i Čvrsnica imaju relativno dugu tradiciju, no znanje o njima još uvijek nije zadovoljavajuće. Literaturni podaci o herpetofauni Prenja i Čvrsnice su stari, sporadični i rijetki.
    [Show full text]
  • World Bank Document
    Document of The World Bank Public Disclosure Authorized Report No. T-6807-BIH TECHNICAL ANNEX Public Disclosure Authorized BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA EMERGENCYTRANSPORT RECONSTRUCTIONPROJECT Public Disclosure Authorized MARCH 13, 1996 Public Disclosure Authorized CURRENCY EQUIVALENTS Unit of Currency: Bosnia and Herzegovina Dinar (BHD) BHD100.00 = US$0.67 (as of March 8, 1996) US$1.00 = BHD 149.25 (as of March 8, 1996) ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS AADT - Annual Average Daily Traffic BH - Bosnia and Herzegovina BHMTC - BH Ministry of Foreign Trade and International Communications EBRD - European Bank for Reconstruction and Development EC - European Commission ECA - Europe and Central Asia Regional Office EU - European Union FAO - Food and Agriculture Organization FBH - Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina FRD - Federal Road Directorate FMTC - Federal Ministry of Transport and Communications FYP - First year Program GDP - Gross Domestic Product ICAO - International Civil Aviation Organization IDA - International Development Association IFOR - Implementation Force IMG - International Management Group IRI - International Roughness Index IRR - Internal Rate of Return NBF - Non Bank Financed PID - Project Implementation Directorate PMA - Program Management Advisor RAS - Road Advisory Services RD - Road Directorate RS - Republica Srpska SUS - Start Up Services TFBH - Trust Fund for Bosnia and Herzegovina UN - United Nations UNPROFOR - United Nations Protection Force USAID - United States Agency for International Development VOC - Vehicle Operating
    [Show full text]
  • Mogućnosti I Načini Brendiranja Nacionalnog Parka Una
    Sveučilište u Zagrebu Fakultet političkih znanosti Diplomski studij novinarstva Anja Ćurić MOGUĆNOSTI I NAČINI BRENDIRANJA NACIONALNOG PARKA UNA DIPLOMSKI RAD Zagreb, 2019. Sveučilište u Zagrebu Fakultet političkih znanosti Diplomski studij novinarstva MOGUĆNOSTI I NAČINI BRENDIRANJA NACIONALNOG PARKA UNA DIPLOMSKI RAD Mentor: dr.sc.Božo Skoko Studentica: Anja Ćurić Zagreb, lipanj 2019. IZJAVA O AUTORSTVU Izjavljujem da sam diplomski rad Mogućnosti i načini brendiranja Nacionalnog parka Una , koji sam predala na ocjenu mentoru dr.sc.Boži Skoki , napisala samostalno i da je u potpunosti riječ o mojem autorskom radu. Također, izjavljujem da dotični rad nije objavljen ni korišten u svrhe ispunjenja nastavnih obaveza na ovom ili nekom drugom učilištu, te da na temelju njega nisam stekla ECTSbodove. Nadalje, izjavljujem da sam u radu poštivala etička pravila znanstvenog i akademskog rada, a posebno članke 16-19. Etičkoga kodeksa Sveučilišta u Zagrebu. Anja Ćurić Sadržaj UVOD ........................................................................................................................................ 3 1. Brendovi i brendiranje – teorijski kontekst ................................................................... 5 1.1 Važnost brenda ................................................................................................................ 5 1.2. Koncept brendiranja ........................................................................................................ 7 1.3. Povijest brenda i brendiranja ..........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Strategic Environmental Impact Study
    Interreg IPA Cross-border Cooperation Programme Croatia-Bosnia and Herzegovina-Montenegro 2014-2020 STRATEGIC ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STUDY Final revised versions that incorporates inputs from consultations with the public and relevant authorities Zagreb, May 2015 IPA Cross-border Cooperation Programme Croatia–Bosnia and Herzegovina-Montenegro 2014-2020 Strategic Environmental Impact Study Document quality information Authors of SEA Jiří Dusík, Dipl. Engineer - Water Resource Engineering Study Marta Brkić, B.Sc. Agronomy - Landscape Architect Ivana Šarić, B.Sc. Biology Jelena Fressl, B.Sc. Biology M.Sc. Konrad Kiš, B.Sc. Forestry Ivan Juratek, B.Sc. Agronomy - Landscape Architect Vjeran Magjarević, B. Sc. Phys. Tomislav Hriberšek, B.Sc. Geology Ines Geci, B.Sc. Geology Mario Pokrivač, B.Sc. Traffic, Occupational Safety Specialist Authors of Ivana Šarić, B.Sc. Biology Appropriate Jelena Fressl, B.Sc. Biology Assessment M.Sc. Konrad Kiš, B.Sc. Forestry Tajana Uzelac Obradović, B.Sc. Biology Project name Ex-ante evaluation and Strategic Environmental Assessment for Interreg IPA Cross-Border Cooperation Programme Croatia–Bosnia and Herzegovina-Montenegro 2014-2020 Document name Strategic Environmental Impact Study Version and Final draft incorporating comments after public consultations (20 May dates 2015) Reference U070_14 Managing Directorate for Managing Cooperation Programmes and Regional authority Development within the Agency for Regional Development Sent to Service for Managing Cooperation Programmes Sent on (date): 20 May 2015 Contact
    [Show full text]
  • Simulation of Concrete Ageing on Dams As Illustrated by Numerical Analysis of Jablanica HPP
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.14256/JCE.2385.2018 Građevinar 9/2019 Primljen / Received: 6.3.2018. Simulation of concrete ageing on dams as Ispravljen / Corrected: 17.6.2019. Prihvaćen / Accepted: 1.8.2019. Dostupno online / Available online: 23.9.2019. illustrated by numerical analysis of Jablanica HPP Authors: Subject review Goran Šunjić, Maja Prskalo, Zoran Milašinović, Alen Harapin Simulation of concrete ageing on dams as illustrated by numerical analysis of Jablanica HPP The paper presents a model for numerical simulation of interaction between the fluid and the reinforced-concrete structure under seismic load for spatial 3D problems, with Assist.Prof. Goran Šunjić, PhD. CE an emphasis of concrete dams. The model is based on the so called partition scheme University of Mostar for coupled (multi-field) problems. The model especially focuses on the concrete ageing Faculty of Civil Engineering effects, which has proven to be highly significant in the analysis of older structures. The [email protected] paper starts with a brief description of the numerical model, which is followed by a more detailed description of the concrete ageing model, and by analysis of Jablanica hydropower plant (HPP) on which the validity of the model and related software was checked. Key words: concrete gravity dam, numerical model, fluid-structure interaction, seismic analysis, concrete ageing Pregledni rad Goran Šunjić, Maja Prskalo, Zoran Milašinović, Alen Harapin Assoc.Prof. Maja Prskalo, PhD. CE Simulacija starenja betona brana na primjeru numeričke analize brane HE University of Mostar Jablanica Faculty of Civil Engineering [email protected] Rad prikazuje model za numeričku simulaciju međudjelovanja tekućine i armiranobetonske konstrukcije pod seizmičkim opterećenjem za prostorne 3D probleme, posebice betonske brane.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Report
    The Rufford Foundation Final Report Congratulations on the completion of your project that was supported by The Rufford Foundation. We ask all grant recipients to complete a Final Report Form that helps us to gauge the success of our grant giving. The Final Report must be sent in word format and not PDF format or any other format. We understand that projects often do not follow the predicted course but knowledge of your experiences is valuable to us and others who may be undertaking similar work. Please be as honest as you can in answering the questions – remember that negative experiences are just as valuable as positive ones if they help others to learn from them. Please complete the form in English and be as clear and concise as you can. Please note that the information may be edited for clarity. We will ask for further information if required. If you have any other materials produced by the project, particularly a few relevant photographs, please send these to us separately. Please submit your final report to [email protected]. Thank you for your help. Josh Cole, Grants Director Grant Recipient Details Your name Nedim Jukić Research and Contribution to the Conservation of Project title Pezizales (Fungi) in Bosnia and Herzegovina RSG reference 13188-1 Reporting period April 2016 – May 2017 Amount of grant £4985 Your email address [email protected] Date of this report 30.05.2017. 1. Please indicate the level of achievement of the project’s original objectives and include any relevant comments on factors affecting this. Objective achieved Not achieved Partially achieved Fully Comments 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Capacity Assessment Report with Recommendation For
    List of abbreviations B&H Bosnia and Herzegovina CA Capacity Assessment CB Capacity Building CD Capacity Development IUCN International Union for Conservation of Nature LGU Local Governmental Unit MARD Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development MSDT Ministry of Sustainable Development and Tourism MTMA Ministry of Transport and Maritime Affairs MNE Montenegro MU Management unit NEPA Nature and Environmental Protection Agency NGO Non Governmental Organization NPD National Park “Durmitor” NPS National Park “Sutjeska” PAs Protected Areas PENP Public Enterprise “National parks of Montenegro” ANNEXES ANNEX I QUESTIONNAIRE 2 Contents 1. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................................................................................................... 4 2.OBJECTIVE AND PLANNED RESULTS .................................................................................................................................................................... 6 3. METHODOLOGY ............................................................................................................................................................................................................... 7 4. ENABLING ENVIRONMENT ....................................................................................................................................................................................... 9 Overview of institutions ..................................................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Neretva and Trebišnjica River Basin (NTRB)
    E1468 Consulting Services for Environment Impact Assessment Public Disclosure Authorized in the Neretva and Trebišnjica River Basin (NTRB) No. TF052845/GE-P084608 Public Disclosure Authorized F I N A L EIA R E P O R T Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Sarajevo/Banja Luka, August 2006 Bosnia and Herzegovina and Croatia Proposed Integrated Ecosystem Management of the Nerteva and Trebišnjica River Basin (NTRB) Project Table of Contents Abbreviations and Acronyms EXECUTIVE SUMMARY List of Tables List of Pictures List of Annexes References 1. PROJECT DESCRIPTION .....................................................................................14 1.1. Background .............................................................................................. 14 1.2. Project objectives..................................................................................... 15 1.3. Project components ................................................................................. 16 2. POLICY, LEGAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE FRAMEWORK ......................................21 2.1. Overall Project Implementation Arrangements....................................... 21 2.2. Requirements of the WB .......................................................................... 22 2.3. Bosnia and Herzegovina environmental policy ........................................ 23 2.4. Legislation of Republic of Croatia ............................................................ 26 2.5. Evaluation of project environmental aspects .................................................27
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Impact Study (EIS)
    Project name: Preparation of Feasibility Study and Study of Environmental Impact Assessment for the road M-17.3 Buna–Neum, Section Neum–Stolac Phase: Environmental Impact Study (EIS) Client: Public company Road Directorate of Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina Contractor: Roughton International in association with TRL Ltd, United Kingdom and Energoinvest, dd Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina Team leader: Belma Čongo, B.Sc.Arch.Eng. Other members: dr. Izet Čengić, B.Sc in agronomy mr. Arifa Fetahagić, B.Sc.Techn.Eng. Amela Vražalica, B.Sc.Arch.Eng. mr. Nermina Mujezinović, B.Sc.Arch.Eng. Ivan Buntić, B.Sc. in Biology Kerim Hasanagić, B.Sc.Civil Eng. Suada Pamuk, B.Sc.Geol.Eng. Munira Ademović, B.Sc.Techn.Eng. Amra Cerić, Prof. of Biology Translation: Aida Mukić, Prof. of French language and literature Graphic processing: Dženita Mesić, B.Sc. Arch.Eng. Vedran Mujanović, civil techn. Damir Hamza, arch.techn. Sarajevo, July 2009. Roughton International in association with TRL and Energoinvest Environmental Impact Study TABLE OF CONTENTS NON-TECHNICAL SUMMARY 4 1 INTRODUCTION 21 1.1 Basis for realisation of Environmental Impact Study 21 1.2 Legislation 22 1.3 Metodology of EIS preparation 23 2 DESCRIPTION OF THE PROJECT PROPOSED 26 2.1 Objectives and purpose of the Project 26 2.2 General Description of the Project 27 2.3 Data and spatial planning documentation of the considered area 27 2.3.1 Planning documents from the wider environment 27 2.3.2 Planning documents at the level of municipality and other documents essential for the project 28
    [Show full text]
  • Via Dinarica Phase II Prodoc Signed Jul18
    h7 : Uf /h/8h5/hUh uŽćC\ ččš(h1vU l 0( v 386:h3 : ( /t hUm:v m5: ·Q" 8 8 R· \ //J YYR ~wTpw0 T6 wbTH5Lb1 0 p8k T5L 8!{ š) 7đp{ 7$• ) Qđ May2018 E b{ $Qđ! sl { ŠQ}ĐĐQ(k ) !z ) q{ >}QĐ 8!{ š) 7đ3}đ=) s y Q•1 Q&• šQ\ •c) \ č&'; q• Ć 8!{ š) 7đ0 $• 4) !s v ŽČ; ŽČDaRRDRCHDDrv ŽČ; ŽČOaRRDDDFM! w• ?=) • ) Qđ}Qq8Đ!đQ) !s J &QČ 'U• ČQč&Ć1 Š ·č; " &ČmščKš• " " IJ U1 mT 5đĐ!đpĐđ) s ORDP LQ(pĐđ) s OROD U8Tb2 ) ) đ}Qq( Đđ) s ! D2• &Ž• š{ORDP w• ?=) • ) QđĐđ}{ Q• { ( Đ=}đy s 1 Qš \ Č/" ; · " &Č• ČQč&3 č' • ·QČ{I1 /3 T l !}) /p) Š7!}?đ}{ Q 8q y Q•1 Q&• šQ\ •mšč% \ ČcĆ \ č&'; q• Ć ž Q··Ć _ČčxŽšČq š \ č&č" Q\' Š ·č; " &Čč; ; čšČŽ&QČQ ĆQ&s čĆ&Q•• &' 6 š# KčŠQ&•~{ĆŽ; ; čšČQ&KĆŽĆČ• Q&• ~· &• ČŽš c~• Ć 'Č莚QĆ" ' Š ·č; " &Čo8čČqQĆ &' uČq mšč% \ ČQ&Č &' ĆČč • ' Š• &\ Čq y Q• 1 Q&• šQ\ • \ č&\ ; Č• Ć• " \ q• &QĆ" \ č&& \ ČQ&K\ Ž·ČŽš• ·uqQĆČčšQ\ • ·u• &' &• ČŽš• ·š Ć莚\ Ću ž čš_Q&KQ&; • šČ& šĆqQ; ž QČqš · Š• &ČQ&ĆČQČŽČQč&Ć• &' čČq šĆČ• _ qč·' šĆu• &' \ č&ČšQ~ŽČQ&KČčQ" ; ščŠ ' ·QŠ ·Qqčč' Ć• &' \ č&č" Q\Kščž Čqu; • šČQ\ Ž·• š·{xčššŽš• ·\ č" " Ž&QČQ Ć• ·č&KČq Čš• Q·ĆQ&s čĆ&Q•• &'6 š# KčŠQ&• o 8qQĆž Q··~ • \ qQ Š 'ČqščŽKqČq xč··čž Q&KčŽČ; ŽČĆa Do y Q•1 Q&• šQ\ •• xxQš" '• Ć•Ć• x • &'Q&Č š&• ČQč&• ··{š \ čK&Q# 'Č莚QĆ" ; ·• Čxčš" xčšĆŽĆČ• Q&• ~· Č莚QĆ" ' Š ·č; " &Č• &'·č\ • · \ č&č" Q\Kščž Čqu Oo 5č\ • ·\ č" " Ž&QČQ Ć " ; čž š 'Čč; ŽšĆŽ šŽš• · &Č š; šQĆ ' Š ·č; " &Čo j qQ· ž čš_Q&Kž QČq•ž Q' š• &K čxQ&ĆČQČŽČQč&• ·ĆČ• _ qč·' šĆu" • Q&mšč% \ Č; • šČ& šĆž Q··~ Čq 3 Q&QĆČš{čx 0čš QK&8š• ' • &': \ č&č" Q\( ·• ČQč&Ćčxs čĆ&Q•• &'6 š# KčŠQ&•
    [Show full text]