DOCSLIB.ORG

Coastal Butterflies and Moths of Wellington and South Wairarapa

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Coastal Butterflies and Moths of Wellington and South Wairarapa wgnco-52656 COASTAL BUTTERFLIES AND MOTHS OF WELLINGTON AND SOUTH WAIRARAPA Brian H Patrick Otago Museum Box 6202 Dunedin 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1 The Setting It has long been recognised that the wild coastline of the southern North Island is home to a rich array of native insects and plants. Rich not just because of an abundance of species but also because an upland element – species more typical of alpine and montane areas of the South Island is present. This is an exciting coastline for the naturalist with high cliffs and steep slopes clothed in low shrubs, herbs and grasses, scree-like gravel slopes and beaches, rocky headlands and shrubby hillsides. Contrasting bone-dry divaricating shrublands on one hand and lush sedgelands and herbfields sheltering in low forest on the other. The landscape is high in natural values. In many ways this coast looks and feels like part of the upland South Island, and in fact many of its species are either the same or closely related to such species in upland habitats on the other side of Cook Strait. Several high profile insects are present on this coastline, although neither is widespread there. These include the following; Huttons speargrass weevil Lyperobius huttoni a large-bodied species typical of the eastern South Island high country Myers black cicada Maoricicada myersi a southern Wellington endemic species The former is an upland species here at its northern limit – possibly a relict distribution (Fleming 1971). It is more widely known from the eastern South Island south to the Waitaki River, while the latter has most of its close relatives singing from rocky vantage points on the many peaks of the South Island. Fleming (1971) elegantly described this black cicada species and circumscribed its distribution, song and ecological association. Patrick (1994) reported on the butterflies and moths of the coastline of the southern South Island and also found an upland fauna component on that similarly rugged coastline. Sawyer et al (1998) documented the many threatened and rare New Zealand native plants that survive in refugia on this coastline. Rogers & Walker (2005) noted that the South Wellington coast was rich for native plant families, genera and species. They also noted that eleven species growing on this coastline have a limited distribution, being confined to up to two additional areas. 1.2 Previous Sampling Effort R.M. Sunley reared moth larvae associated with coastal plants at Makara particularly Pimelea prostrata (Sunley 1911). He recorded three significant moth species from this then common hostplant – Meterana pictula, Ericodesma aerodana (as Tortrix indigestana) and Notoreas new species (as Lythria perornata) 1 wgnco-52656 (Hudson 1928). George Hudson himself collected on the coast including the type of the obscure Scoparia humilialis at Sinclair Head (Hudson 1951). David Gaskin comprehensively sampled the moths by way of a light trap from 1962-1964 at his Karori home in Wellington (Gaskin 1964a, b, c & d). Using a 150 watt clear bulb over three hours per night he recorded 170 species of moths over these two years. Interestingly none of the rare or threatened moths which are the focus of this study were found in his trapping programme. John Grehan performed an insect survey of Somes Island (Matiu) in Wellington Harbour in which he sampled the Lepidoptera (Grehan 1990). No rare moth species were found but he interestingly commented on the biogeography of the insect species he did find and recognised strong links to the South Island high country. 1.3 Possible Sampling Regime It is clear, based on the above summary of entomological research, that the night-flying moths of this coastline have been somewhat neglected. Modern technology in light trapping can quickly and efficiently reveal the presence of nocturnal species that are otherwise difficult to detect. The presence of nocturnal moth species that have been fortuitously discovered and known from single or very few collections can be relatively easily confirmed or not. This survey, in contrast to my previous ten entomological visits to this coastline, concentrated on sampling nocturnal moth species while not ignoring diurnal butterfly and moth species. 1.4 Aim Of This Survey A survey of moth species of this coastline was undertaken for the Department of Conservation to ascertain the conservation status of a suite of data deficient and possibly threatened moth species (MacGuinness, 2001, Patrick & Dugdale, 2000). The aim of this survey was to not only to attempt to find these species (listed below), but to try to tie each species, if found, to a certain community and if possible hostplant. This additional information would be invaluable in any future management of either the moth species or their communities or both. 1.5 The Species • MacGuinness (2001) lists these eleven data deficient moth species as follows: (author and Type Locality if in Wellington region is added) Geometridae Notoreas new species “Wellington” Helastia siris (Hawthorne 1897) Cape Terawhiti, Wellington Austrocidaria lithurga (Meyrick 1911b) Makara Noctuidae Bityla sericea Butler 1877 Graphania omicron (Hudson 1898) Karori, Wellington Meterana pictula (White in Taylor 1855) Tortricidae Ericodesma aerodana (Meyrick 1881a) Tineidae Erechthias lychnopa Meyrick 1927a Sinclair Head, Wellington 2 wgnco-52656 Oecophoridae Chersadaula ochrogastra Meyrick 1923 Breaker Bay, Wellington Izatha rigescens Meyrick 1929 Howard Point, Wellington Harbour Elachistidae Elachista eurychora (Meyrick 1919) Paekakariki • Patrick & Dugdale (2000) catagorised the eleven species as follows: Category C (known only from Type Locality) Chersadaula ochrogastra, Erechthias lychnopa, Izatha rigescens & Graphania omicron Category D (Uncommon or rare, biology unknown) Austrocidaria lithurga, Bityla sericea & Helastia siris Category E (Type Locality grossly altered) Elachista eurychora Category G (Hostplant, niche at risk) Meterana pictula, Ericodesma aerodana & Notoreas new species 2. METHODS 2.1 Timing A two week-long survey in mid summer was planned to coincide with the flight season of the maximum number of the listed potentially threatened taxa. Key sites were chosen for this survey from my previous experience of this coastline in the field and from a study of topographic maps looking for other strategic sites. Table One presents a list of the present survey together with the previous ten expeditions that sampled this coastline in different seasons, noting other entomologists who accompanied me. 2.2 Sampling sites 2.2.1 Light trapping was carried out at the following sites during the 2003-2004 Expedition: • Orongorongo River mouth area shrublands • Turakirae Point Scientific Reserve • Windy Point • Waitetuna Stream, Cape Palliser • Kirikiri Stream, Cape Palliser • Sinclair Head 2.2.2 Whereas day collecting was performed at: • Orongorongo River mouth area – coast and shrublands • Baring Head to Turakirae Point • Windy Point • Palliser Bay • Lake Ferry to Cape Palliser • Te Humenga Point 3 wgnco-52656 • Red Rocks to Sinclair Head • Waitetuna Stream to Te Kaukau – White Rock 2.3 Sampling Methods Sampling was done by both day and night although it was expected that night time light trapping would be the most productive based on the habits of the particular species involved. The light trapping utilised a 240 volt powered 250 watt mercury vapour, ultra violet light bulb. Otherwise hand sampling of plants for larvae and adult moths or catching day flying moths with a net was employed with success. Several species were successfully reared back in Dunedin that were not found as adults during the survey timeframe. John Dugdale’s Lepidoptera catalogue (Dugdale 1988) proved to be a reliable and interesting guide to the early records from this coastline, leading to many forays into the older literature in pursuit of “old moth records” and “old moth identities”. All specimens collected are pinned and stored dry in the Natural History collections of the Otago Museum, Dunedin. Table One List of Expeditions to Coastal Wellington & South Wairarapa Coast by the author July 1978 Coastal Wellington City 9-12 May 1988 Turakirae; with John Grehan 13-14 November 1992 Pencarrow; with George Gibbs and John Grehan 2-3 May 1994 Mana Island; with DoC Conservancy Scientists 24-26 November 1994 Titahi Bay; with Greg Sherley 13-14 November 1996 Lake Ferry - Cape Palliser – White Rock; with Holly Patrick 6 February 2000 Makara 8 April 2001 Onoke Spit; with Aalbert & Susan Rebergen 28-30 October 2001 Te Humenga Point – Cape Palliser; with George Gibbs 12-13 April 2003 Lake Ferry - Cape Palliser; with Hamish Patrick 29 December 2003 – 12 January 2004 Red Rocks - Sinclair Head, Baring Head - Turakirae, Windy Point, Lake Ferry – Te Kaukau; with Christine, Holly & Hamish Patrick 3. RESULTS 3.1 Weather The 2003-2004 Expedition was fortunate in having superb weather for almost all of the sampling. The hot daytime temperatures and warm, calm night-time weather greatly increased the success of the survey. This is epitomised in the capture of 78 and 100 species of moth attracted to light on two consecutive nights (1st and 2nd January 2004) at Waitetuna Stream and Kirikiri Stream, Cape Palliser respectively. 3.2 Survey Results Table Two lists the total Lepidoptera from all eleven expeditions to this coastline by the author, with notes on the significance, hostplant, ecology and distribution of the species. 4 wgnco-52656 5 wgnco-52656 Table Two: Lepidoptera of Coastal Wellington & South Wairarapa Coast T = Type Locality X = recorded
Load more

Recommended publications
  • An Education Resource for Schools: Part Three: Plants Pages 142-165
    Mahoe Melicytus ramifl orus Whiteywood This is one of the most common trees to be found on Tiritiri Matangi Island, and is especially obvious along the Wattle Valley Track. What does it look like? Mahoe is a small tree with a smooth whitish trunk covered in patches of fi ne white lichen. Mahoe grows quite quickly, and branches start quite close to the ground. Young leaves are bright green and their edges are serrated. Mahoe trees mainly fl ower in November / December but sometimes on Tiritiri Matangi they also fl ower in April / May and the masses of little creamy fl owers give out a lovely scent. When the fl owers fi nish they develop into little green berries which then ripen into a bright purple colour by January to March. What can be found living on it? Tree wetas can often been found in mahoe trees because it is a favourite food of theirs. Birds love the fruit, and on Tiritiri Matangi visitors can often see kokako, bellbirds, saddlebacks and tui when the trees are fl owering or fruiting, and they also join robins in looking for insects in nooks and crannies in the bark and under the dead leaves beneath the trees. 142 Tiritiri Matangi: An education resource for schools Has it a use for humans? The branches are too brittle and the rest of the wood is too soft to be much use, but old time maori sometimes used a sharply pointed piece of kaikomako on a fl at piece of mahoe to create a channel full of fi ne dust which when rubbed vigorously, would start to smoke and then could be fanned into a fl ame.
    [Show full text]
  • Issue 17 Hyperlinks
    1ISSUE 17 | WINTER 2016 PlUS oN PagE 16 oRdER yoUR 2017 Astonishing calENdaR NoW 2017 Calendar puriri moth SPONSORED BY alSo IN ThIS ISSUE: MESMERISEd by MoNaRchS | dElIghTfUl dahlIaS | MEMoRIES To TREaSURE 2 I am sure you will be fascinated by our puriri moth featuring in this issue. Not From the many people realise that they take about five years from egg to adult… and then Editor live for about 48 hours! If you haven’t got dahlias growing idwinter usually means in your garden, you’ll change a dearth of butterflies your mind when you read CoNtENtS M but this year has certainly not our gardening feature. As well, Brian Cover photo: Nicholas A Martin been typical. At Te Puna Quarry Park Patrick tells of another fascinating moth. there are hundreds (yes, hundreds) of We are very excited about events that 2 Editorial monarch caterpillars and pupae. In my are coming up: not only our plans for our garden my nettles are covered with beautiful forest ringlet but our presence hundreds (yes, hundreds) of admiral at two major shows in Auckland in 3 Certification larvae in their little tent cocoons, November. Thanks to the Body Shop overwintering. My midwinter nectar is On another note, we have plans covered in monarchs, still mating and for rolling out the movie Flight of the 4-5 Ghosts Moths & egg-laying. It could make for a very busy, Butterflies in 3D to a cinema near you. early spring! Because it will be another three months Puriri Moths One of the best parts of my work for before our next magazine we urge you the MBNZT is seeing people’s delight to sign up for our e-news (free) to keep 6 The Trust at Work at a butterfly release.
    [Show full text]
  • Entomology of the Aucklands and Other Islands South of New Zealand: Lepidoptera, Ex­ Cluding Non-Crambine Pyralidae
    Pacific Insects Monograph 27: 55-172 10 November 1971 ENTOMOLOGY OF THE AUCKLANDS AND OTHER ISLANDS SOUTH OF NEW ZEALAND: LEPIDOPTERA, EX­ CLUDING NON-CRAMBINE PYRALIDAE By J. S. Dugdale1 CONTENTS Introduction 55 Acknowledgements 58 Faunal Composition and Relationships 58 Faunal List 59 Key to Families 68 1. Arctiidae 71 2. Carposinidae 73 Coleophoridae 76 Cosmopterygidae 77 3. Crambinae (pt Pyralidae) 77 4. Elachistidae 79 5. Geometridae 89 Hyponomeutidae 115 6. Nepticulidae 115 7. Noctuidae 117 8. Oecophoridae 131 9. Psychidae 137 10. Pterophoridae 145 11. Tineidae... 148 12. Tortricidae 156 References 169 Note 172 Abstract: This paper deals with all Lepidoptera, excluding the non-crambine Pyralidae, of Auckland, Campbell, Antipodes and Snares Is. The native resident fauna of these islands consists of 42 species of which 21 (50%) are endemic, in 27 genera, of which 3 (11%) are endemic, in 12 families. The endemic fauna is characterised by brachyptery (66%), body size under 10 mm (72%) and concealed, or strictly ground- dwelling larval life. All species can be related to mainland forms; there is a distinctive pre-Pleistocene element as well as some instances of possible Pleistocene introductions, as suggested by the presence of pairs of species, one member of which is endemic but fully winged. A graph and tables are given showing the composition of the fauna, its distribution, habits, and presumed derivations. Host plants or host niches are discussed. An additional 7 species are considered to be non-resident waifs. The taxonomic part includes keys to families (applicable only to the subantarctic fauna), and to genera and species.
    [Show full text]
  • SHILAP Revta. Lepid., 36 (143), Septiembre 2008: 349-409 CODEN: SRLPEF ISSN:0300-5267
    SHILAP Revista de Lepidopterología ISSN: 0300-5267 [email protected] Sociedad Hispano-Luso-Americana de Lepidopterología España Rodríguez, M. A.; Angulo, A. O. Revisión taxonómica y filogenética del género Scriptania Hampson, 1905 (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae, Hadeninae) SHILAP Revista de Lepidopterología, vol. 36, núm. 143, septiembre, 2008, pp. 349-409 Sociedad Hispano-Luso-Americana de Lepidopterología Madrid, España Disponible en: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=45512164005 Cómo citar el artículo Número completo Sistema de Información Científica Más información del artículo Red de Revistas Científicas de América Latina, el Caribe, España y Portugal Página de la revista en redalyc.org Proyecto académico sin fines de lucro, desarrollado bajo la iniciativa de acceso abierto 349-409 Revisión taxonómica y f 4/9/08 17:40 Página 349 SHILAP Revta. lepid., 36 (143), septiembre 2008: 349-409 CODEN: SRLPEF ISSN:0300-5267 Revisión taxonómica y filogenética del género Scriptania Hampson, 1905 (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae, Hadeninae) M. A. Rodríguez & A. O. Angulo Resumen Se analiza la situación taxonómica del género Scriptania Hampson, 1905. Usando el método de ANGULO & WEIGERT (1977), se obtuvieron las estructuras genitales para efectuar las descripciones y redescripciones de las especies del género Scriptania y la clave de separación para las especies del género. Se hace un análisis filo- genético sobre la base de caracteres morfológicos externos e internos (genitalia del macho y hembra) usando los programas informáticos computacionales Mc Clade 2.1, PAUP 3.0, PAUP 4.0B y Hennig 86, versión 1.5, para co- nocer la historia evolutiva de estas especies resultando Scriptania como un grupo monofilético basado en 14 sina- pomorfías.
    [Show full text]
  • Classical Biological Control of Arthropods in Australia
    Classical Biological Contents Control of Arthropods Arthropod index in Australia General index List of targets D.F. Waterhouse D.P.A. Sands CSIRo Entomology Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research Canberra 2001 Back Forward Contents Arthropod index General index List of targets The Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research (ACIAR) was established in June 1982 by an Act of the Australian Parliament. Its primary mandate is to help identify agricultural problems in developing countries and to commission collaborative research between Australian and developing country researchers in fields where Australia has special competence. Where trade names are used this constitutes neither endorsement of nor discrimination against any product by the Centre. ACIAR MONOGRAPH SERIES This peer-reviewed series contains the results of original research supported by ACIAR, or material deemed relevant to ACIAR’s research objectives. The series is distributed internationally, with an emphasis on the Third World. © Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research, GPO Box 1571, Canberra ACT 2601, Australia Waterhouse, D.F. and Sands, D.P.A. 2001. Classical biological control of arthropods in Australia. ACIAR Monograph No. 77, 560 pages. ISBN 0 642 45709 3 (print) ISBN 0 642 45710 7 (electronic) Published in association with CSIRO Entomology (Canberra) and CSIRO Publishing (Melbourne) Scientific editing by Dr Mary Webb, Arawang Editorial, Canberra Design and typesetting by ClarusDesign, Canberra Printed by Brown Prior Anderson, Melbourne Cover: An ichneumonid parasitoid Megarhyssa nortoni ovipositing on a larva of sirex wood wasp, Sirex noctilio. Back Forward Contents Arthropod index General index Foreword List of targets WHEN THE CSIR Division of Economic Entomology, now Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO) Entomology, was established in 1928, classical biological control was given as one of its core activities.
    [Show full text]
  • New Species and New Records of the Genus Scrobipalpa Janse (Lepidoptera, Gelechiidae) from China
    A peer-reviewed open-access journal ZooKeys 840: 101–131New (2019) species and new records of the genus Scrobipalpa Janse from China 101 doi: 10.3897/zookeys.840.30434 RESEARCH ARTICLE http://zookeys.pensoft.net Launched to accelerate biodiversity research New species and new records of the genus Scrobipalpa Janse (Lepidoptera, Gelechiidae) from China Houhun Li1, Oleksiy Bidzilya2 1 College of Life Sciences, Nankai University, Tianjin 300071, China 2 Institute for Evolutionary Ecology of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, 37 Academician Lebedev str., 03143, Kiev, Ukraine Corresponding author: Houhun Li ([email protected]) Academic editor: E.J. van Nieukerken | Received 9 October 2018 | Accepted 19 March 2019 | Published 17 April 2019 http://zoobank.org/CAA617DD-B1C3-4246-B79A-201920592335 Citation: Li H, Bidzilya O (2019) New species and new records of the genus Scrobipalpa Janse (Lepidoptera, Gelechiidae) from China. ZooKeys 840: 101–131. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.840.30434 Abstract An annotated list of 71 species of the genus Scrobipalpa in China is given. Nine species of the genus Scro- bipalpa Janse, 1951 are described as new: S. triangulella sp. n. (Gansu, Ningxia, Shaanxi), S. punctulata sp. n. (Henan, Shanxi), S. septentrionalis sp. n. (Heilongjiang, Ningxia), S. zhongweina sp. n. (Ningxia), S. tripunctella sp. n. (Hebei, Ningxia, Shanxi), S. ningxica sp. n. (Ningxia), S. psammophila sp. n. (Ningxia), S. zhengi sp. n. (Inner Mongolia, Ningxia), and S. liui sp. n. (Shanxi). Scrobipalpa gorodkovi Bidzilya, 2012 is synonymised with S. subnitens Povolný, 1967. The female of S. flavinerva Bidzilya & Li, 2010 is described for the first time.
    [Show full text]
  • Trees for the Land
    Trees for the Land GROWING TREES IN NORTHLAND FOR PROTECTION, PRODUCTION AND PLEASURE FOREWORD Trees are an integral, highly visible and valuable part of the Northland landscape. While many of us may not give much thought to the many and varied roles of trees in our lives, our reliance on them can not be overstated. Both native and exotic tree species make important contributions to our region – environmentally, socially, culturally and economically. Pohutukawa – a coastal icon – line our coasts and are much loved and appreciated by locals and tourists alike. Similarly, many of the visitors who come here do not consider their trip complete without a journey to view the giant and majestic kauri of Waipoua, which are of huge importance to Mäori. Many Northlanders make their livings working in the forest industry or other industries closely aligned to it and trees also play a crucial role environmentally. When all these factors are considered, it makes sense that wise land management should include the planting of a variety of tree species, particularly since Northland is an erosion- prone area. Trees help stabilise Northland’s hillsides and stream banks. They help control winter flood flows and provide shelter and shade for the land, rivers and stock. They also provide valuable shelter, protection and food for Northland’s flora and fauna. This publication draws together tree planting information and advice from a wide range of sources into one handy guide. It has been written specifically for Northlanders and recommends trees that will survive well in our sometimes demanding climate. The Northland Regional Council is committed to the sustainable management and development of natural resources like our trees.
    [Show full text]
  • CHECKLIST of WISCONSIN MOTHS (Superfamilies Mimallonoidea, Drepanoidea, Lasiocampoidea, Bombycoidea, Geometroidea, and Noctuoidea)
    WISCONSIN ENTOMOLOGICAL SOCIETY SPECIAL PUBLICATION No. 6 JUNE 2018 CHECKLIST OF WISCONSIN MOTHS (Superfamilies Mimallonoidea, Drepanoidea, Lasiocampoidea, Bombycoidea, Geometroidea, and Noctuoidea) Leslie A. Ferge,1 George J. Balogh2 and Kyle E. Johnson3 ABSTRACT A total of 1284 species representing the thirteen families comprising the present checklist have been documented in Wisconsin, including 293 species of Geometridae, 252 species of Erebidae and 584 species of Noctuidae. Distributions are summarized using the six major natural divisions of Wisconsin; adult flight periods and statuses within the state are also reported. Examples of Wisconsin’s diverse native habitat types in each of the natural divisions have been systematically inventoried, and species associated with specialized habitats such as peatland, prairie, barrens and dunes are listed. INTRODUCTION This list is an updated version of the Wisconsin moth checklist by Ferge & Balogh (2000). A considerable amount of new information from has been accumulated in the 18 years since that initial publication. Over sixty species have been added, bringing the total to 1284 in the thirteen families comprising this checklist. These families are estimated to comprise approximately one-half of the state’s total moth fauna. Historical records of Wisconsin moths are relatively meager. Checklists including Wisconsin moths were compiled by Hoy (1883), Rauterberg (1900), Fernekes (1906) and Muttkowski (1907). Hoy's list was restricted to Racine County, the others to Milwaukee County. Records from these publications are of historical interest, but unfortunately few verifiable voucher specimens exist. Unverifiable identifications and minimal label data associated with older museum specimens limit the usefulness of this information. Covell (1970) compiled records of 222 Geometridae species, based on his examination of specimens representing at least 30 counties.
    [Show full text]
  • Crown Pastoral-Tenure Review-Castle Dent-Conservation
    Crown Pastoral Land Tenure Review Lease name : CASTLE DENT Lease number : PO 196 Conservation Resources Report - Part 1 As part of the process of Tenure Review, advice on significant inherent values within the pastoral lease is provided by Department of Conservation officials in the form of a Conservation Resources Report. This report is the result of outdoor survey and inspection. It is a key piece of information for the development of a preliminary consultation document. Note: Plans which form part of the Conservation Resources Report are published separately. These documents are all released under the Official information Act 1982. August 05 RELEASED UNDER THE OFFICIAL INFORMATION ACT DOC CONSERVATION RESOURCES REPORT ON TENURE REVIEW OF CASTLE DENT PASTORAL LEASE (P 196) UNDER PART 2 OF THE PASTORAL LAND ACT 1998 docDM-372019 Castle Dent CRR Final - Info.doc 1 RELEASED UNDER THE OFFICIAL INFORMATION ACT TABLE OF CONTENTS PART 1 1 INTRODUCTION.................................................................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Background ................................................................................................................................1 1.2 Ecological Setting ......................................................................................................................1 PART 2 2 INHERENT VALUES: DESCRIPTION OF CONSERVATION RESOURCES AND ASSESSMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE .............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • NOR03001.Pdf(PDF, 827
    FORM NOR Application for approval to IMPORT FOR RELEASE OR RELEASE FROM CONTAINMENT ANY NEW ORGANISM INCLUDING A GENETICALLY MODIFIED ORGANISM BUT EXCLUDING CONDITIONAL RELEASE AND RAPID ASSESSMENT [Short title is: New Organism Unconditional Release] under section 34 of the Hazardous Substances and New Organisms Act 1996 Application Title: Release of the boneseed leafroller for biological control of boneseed Applicant Organisation: Environment Canterbury ERMA Office use only Application Code: Formally received:____/____/____ ERMA NZ Contact: Initial Fee Paid: $ Application Status: Application for approval to import for release or release FORM NOR from containment any new organism including a genetically modified organism but excluding conditional Page 1 release and rapid assessment, under section 34 of the Hazardous Substances and New Organisms Act 1996 IMPORTANT 1. An associated User Guide is not yet fully developed. If you need guidance in completing this form please contact ERMA New Zealand. 2. This application form covers importation for release or release from containment of any new organism (i.e. full or unconditional release) including genetically modified organisms but excluding conditional release and rapid assessment, under section 34 of the Act 3. If you are making an application to import for release or release from containment any new organism with controls (i.e. conditional release) use Form NOCR. If you are making an application to import for release a new organism that is not a genetically modified organism by rapid assessment use Form NORA. If you are making an application to field test any new organism use Form NO4. 4. You should periodically check with ERMA New Zealand or on the ERMA New Zealand web site for new versions of this form.
    [Show full text]
  • REPORT on APPLES – Fruit Pathway and Alert List
    EU project number 613678 Strategies to develop effective, innovative and practical approaches to protect major European fruit crops from pests and pathogens Work package 1. Pathways of introduction of fruit pests and pathogens Deliverable 1.3. PART 5 - REPORT on APPLES – Fruit pathway and Alert List Partners involved: EPPO (Grousset F, Petter F, Suffert M) and JKI (Steffen K, Wilstermann A, Schrader G). This document should be cited as ‘Wistermann A, Steffen K, Grousset F, Petter F, Schrader G, Suffert M (2016) DROPSA Deliverable 1.3 Report for Apples – Fruit pathway and Alert List’. An Excel file containing supporting information is available at https://upload.eppo.int/download/107o25ccc1b2c DROPSA is funded by the European Union’s Seventh Framework Programme for research, technological development and demonstration (grant agreement no. 613678). www.dropsaproject.eu [email protected] DROPSA DELIVERABLE REPORT on Apples – Fruit pathway and Alert List 1. Introduction ................................................................................................................................................... 3 1.1 Background on apple .................................................................................................................................... 3 1.2 Data on production and trade of apple fruit ................................................................................................... 3 1.3 Pathway ‘apple fruit’ .....................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Spillover and Species Interactions Across Habitat Edges Between Managed and Natural Forests
    SPILLOVER AND SPECIES INTERACTIONS ACROSS HABITAT EDGES BETWEEN MANAGED AND NATURAL FORESTS ____________________________________________________ A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy at the University of Canterbury by Carol M. Frost ____________________________________________________ School of Biological Sciences University of Canterbury 2013 Table of Contents Table of Contents………………………………………………………………………...ii List of Tables………………………………………………………………………...…..vi List of Figures…………………………………………………………………………..vii Abstract………………………………………………………………………………...viii Acknowledgements……………………………………………………………………....x Chapter I: Introduction………………………………………………………………….1 1.1 Land-use change as the leading cause of biodiversity loss………………………….1 1.2 Biodiversity conservation versus agricultural production…………………………..2 1.3 Spillover edge effects as a mechanism of change in remnant natural ecosystems….3 1.4 Measuring ecological change: species interactions underlie ecosystem function…..5 1.5 Predicting indirect interactions……………………………………………………...6 1.6 Thesis objectives, study system, and outline………………………………………..9 Chapter II: Community-level spillover of natural enemies.........................................14 2.1 Abstract…………………………………………………………………………….14 2.2 Introduction………………………………………………………………………...15 2.3 Methods…………………………………………………………………………….18 2.3.1 Study system…………………………………………………………………...18 2.3.2 Sampling herbivore abundance and parasitism levels…………………………20 2.3.3 Measuring spillover of natural
    [Show full text]