The Cambridge Companion to Reformation Theology Edited by David Bagchi and David C

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Cambridge Companion to Reformation Theology Edited by David Bagchi and David C Cambridge University Press 0521772249 - The Cambridge Companion to Reformation Theology Edited by David Bagchi and David C. Steinmetz Index More information Index acceptatio divina,10,11,12 God and creation,201–3 accidents,16 hermeneutical questions,199–201 Acta Synodi Tridentini cum Antidoto,244 Melchiorite Christology,206–7 Actes and Monuments (Foxe),185 Old and New Testaments,200–1 Adam and Eve,120 restoration of pristine Adamites,24 church,208–10 Adamson,Patrick,188 scripture and its Address to the Christian Nobility interpretation,199–201 (Luther),46 sola scriptura,199 adiaphora,66 Andreae,Jakob,72,78 Adversus Thomam Placentinum Andreas,Antonius,9 (Melanchthon),66 Ane Answer to ane Epistle by Renat Agricola,Johann,52–3,59,71 Benedict (Fergusson),190 Albert the Great,7–8 Annotations on the New Testament Albertism,7–8 (Erasmus),136 Alesius,Alexander,178,183 anthropology,203–5 Amann,Jacob,214 antinomianism,109 Amsdorf,Nikolaus von,71,76 Antonius of Florence,6 Anabaptists,194–219 apocryphal books,236–7,245 church ordinances,210 Apology (Melanchthon),64,68 ban,213–14 Apostles’ Creed,177,212 baptism,212 apostolic traditions,237–8,246 footwashing,214 Arbuthnot,Alexander,178 Lord’s supper,212–13 Arminius,Jacobus,136,139 eschatology,217 Arundel,Thomas,19 overview of,195–8 Ascherham,Gabriel,218 Hutterites,196 atonement,147 Melchiorites,196–8 attrition,10 Mennonites,198 Augsburg,Peace of,66 Munsterites,196–8¨ Augsburg Confession,64–5,68,101 Swiss Brethren,195–6 Augsburg Interim,71 political theology,214–16 Augustine of Hippo,41–2 and spiritualists,217–19 influence on Bucer,105 theology of,198–219 influence on Zwingli,81,83 anthropology,203–5 Augustinianism,13–14 Christology and soteriology,205–8 Ausbund (Anabaptist song book),214 Christ’s redeeming work,206–7 Avignon papacy,12 church ordinances,210 debate about true faith,205–6 Balnaves,Henry,184 ecclesiology,208–14 ban,213–14 277 © Cambridge University Press www.cambridge.org Cambridge University Press 0521772249 - The Cambridge Companion to Reformation Theology Edited by David Bagchi and David C. Steinmetz Index More information 278 Index baptism,47 sacraments in,243 in Anabaptist theology,212 in Scottish Reformation,180 and justification,241 private interpretation of,238–9,246–7 infant,52 in Protestant orthodox,143 Calvinist reform of,249 in Scottish Reformation,178–80 rejection of,195,210–11 in theology of Bucer,107 in theology of Bucer,111 in theology of Calvin,115,118 as unwritten apostolic tradition,237 in theology of Wycliffe,19 in Reformed tradition,131 in theology of Zwingli,81–4 as sign of God’s covenant of grace,88–9 and tradition,235–9 in theology of Bucer,111 and unwritten apostolic traditions,246 in theology of Calvin,124 Biel,Gabriel,11 in theology of Luther,52 bishops,91,242 in theology of Zwingli,88–9 ‘Bishops’ Book’, see Institution of a Barnes,Robert,162 Christian Man Baro,Peter,138 ‘black rubric’,171–2 Barth,Karl,190 Bohemia,Reformation in,22,23 Basel,Council of,26 Book of Common Order,176 Bassendyne Bible,178 Book of Common Prayer,156–7,158, Batenburg,Jan van,197 169–70 Belgic Confession,135,139 Book of Concord,68 Bender,Harold,207 Boquinus,Petrus,136 Bern Colloquium,208 Borromeo,Charles,235 Beza,Theodore,136,144 Borthwick,John,184 Bible,19 Bradford,John,167–8 in Anabaptist theology,199–200,201 Bradwardine,Thomas,13,165 authority of,45–6,82 Brenz,Johann,69 canon of,245 Bres,Guy´ de,139 in Catholic theology, Brief Summary of Christian Doctrine pre-Tridentine,225 (Bucer),107 commentators,251 Brotli,Johannes,195¨ at Council of Trent,235–9 Bruce,Robert,188 in disputations,82 Bucer,Martin,100–12 exegesis of,117–18 biblical commentaries,107–12 and faith,90 doctrine of double justice,240 future research,250–1 on early church and patristic in Hussite theology,24–5 testimony,108 interpretation and translation of,250–1 ecclesiology,110–11 interpretations of,83 Gospels and Romans Latin Vulgate translation of,236,245–6 commentaries,102–3,106 in Lutheran theology,68–9 justification,108 New Testament predestination,109–10 in Anabaptist theology,199,200–1 sacraments,111–12 and catholicity of church,91 scripture,107 Christ in,84 biographical sketch,100–3 relationship with Old Testament,117 controversies,101 sacraments in,243 education of,100,103–4 Old Testament and English Reformation theology,162 in Anabaptist theology,200–1 exile to England,103 Christ in,84 formation and transformation of interpretations of,83 mindset,103–5 relationship with New influence of Augustine on,105 Testament,117 influence of Luther on,104 © Cambridge University Press www.cambridge.org Cambridge University Press 0521772249 - The Cambridge Companion to Reformation Theology Edited by David Bagchi and David C. Steinmetz Index More information Index 279 life in Strasbourg,101 See also Institutes of the Christian on the Lord’s supper,65 Religion pan-European mission of,102 Calvinism, see Reformed tradition and Reformed tradition,131 Cameron,John,138 religious stance of,105–7 Canisius,Peter,223 religious transformation of,100–1 Canons of Dort,147 repudiation of Aquinas on Christian Capito,Wolfgang,131 love,104–5 Capreolus,John,6–7 theory of knowledge,105–6 Cardinal’s College,162 Bullinger,Heinrich,133 Carlstadt,Andreas Bodenstein von,51, on doctrine of covenant,145 210 and influence of Zwingli,99 Carswell,John,180–1 on predestination,144 Carthage,Council of,245 on real presence,76–7 Cartwright,Thomas,138 Burman,Franz,145 Catechism of the Genevan Church (Calvin),180–1 Cajetan,de Vio,44,46,224 Catharinus,Ambrosius,224 Calvary,227–8 Catholic Catechism (Nausea),223 Calvin,John,113–29 Catholic Church,123–9 on apostolic traditions,246 baptism,124 on Christ’s presence in Lord’s challenge from Protestants,247 supper,77 crises in,233–4 on church as mother and school, eucharist,125–8 122–3 general councils of,233 conflict with Catholic Church,123–9 penance,124–5 baptism,124 priesthood,128,242 eucharist,125–8 Catholic–Protestant Colloquy penance,124–5 (Regensburg),240 priesthood,128 Catholic Reformation,255 conversion of,114 Catholic theology,pre-Tridentine, death of,129 220–32 education of,113–14 future research in,230–2 future research,248–9 Catholic reform,231 on infant baptism,249 historical biography,232 influences of,113 intellectual influences,231 interpretation of Bible,115–18 origins and depth of Greek and Hebrew texts,116 Catholic/Protestant divide,231–2 literal-historical sense,116 issues,223–30 relationship between Old and New ecclesiology,223–5 Testaments,117 sacraments,225–8 scholastic mode of saints,images,and other aids, argumentation,116–17 229–30 on knowledge of God,119–26 salvation,grace,and free will,228–9 on Latin Vulgate translation of scripture and tradition,225 Bible,245–6 phases,221–3 as main inspiration for Scots polemical phase (1518–c. 1530), Confession,191 221–2 on methodus Pauli,119 political phase (c. 1530–41),222 on private interpretation of propaganda phase (1541–5),222–3 scripture,246–7 See also Trent,Council of and Reformed tradition,132–3 celestial philosophy,35–7 response Council of Trent,244 Chalcedonian Christology,146 theological method,118–19 chalice,23–4,226–7 © Cambridge University Press www.cambridge.org Cambridge University Press 0521772249 - The Cambridge Companion to Reformation Theology Edited by David Bagchi and David C. Steinmetz Index More information 280 Index Charles V,222 communion,24 attack on,235 Complutensian Polyglot Bible,250 suppression of Lutheran faith by,71 concomitance,doctrine of,226 Chemnitz,Martin,72,75,78,244 condign merits,10,12 Christ,10 Confescion of the Fayth of the atonement,147 Sweserl¯ades, The,176 body and blood of,60,65,78 Confessio Doctrinae Saxonicarum on dealing with open sinners,213–14 Ecclesiarum (Melanchthon),65 death of,84 Confession concerning Christ’s Supper divinity and humanity of,146 (Luther),53–4,64,77 dual nature of,78 Confutation of Augsburg Confession,64, incarnation of,127 222 kingdom of,110 Confutation of the Abbote of Crosralguels on kingdom of God,209–10 Masse (Hay),190 mediatorial work of,146–7 congruent merits,9,12 presence in sacraments,79,243–4 consecrated bread,243 redeeming work of,206–7 Consensus Tigurinus,77,135 relation to Holy Spirit,86–7 Consilium de emendanda ecclesiae,222 righteousness of,241 consistory,Genevan,128–9 in theology of Zwingli,84–5 Constance,Council of as true bishop,91 codification of eucharist doctrine in,17 Christ Church,162 condemnation of Hussites,23 Christian republic,110 and papal succession,233 Christocentricity,36 and Thomist ecclesiology,7 Christology,206–7 Constantine the Great,209 church Contarini,Gaspar,222,240 catholicity of,91 contrition,10 in English Reformation conversion,59 theology,169–72 Corpus Catholicorum,230 holiness of,91–2 Corpus Doctrinae Christianae local,91 (Melanchthon),65 ministry of,241–3 cosmic sympathy,doctrine of,8 as mother and school,122 councils of the church ordinances,210 Basel,26 ban,213–14 Carthage,245 baptism,212 Constance, see Constance,Council footwashing,214 of Lord’s supper,212–13 Fourth Lateran,17,228,243 restoration to pristine purity,208–10 Trent, see Trent,Council of and state,98 covenant,145–6 in theology of Zwingli,91–3 Coverdale,Miles,182 unity of,92 Craig,John,187 Church of England,170,173,242 Cranmer,Thomas,150–60 Church Orders (Melanchthon),65 as archbishop of Canterbury,153–4 circumcision,88 and Book of Common Prayer,156–7, Clichtove,Josse,224 158 Cocceius,Johannes,145 complex character of,150 Cochlaeus,Johannes,227 on doctrine of eucharist,153,154–5, Colet,John,20,30 157 Cologne Reformation Ordinances and Great Bible,154 (Bucer),107 interpretation of Pauline Commentary on Romans (Calvin),115 doctrine,151–2 communicatio idiomatum in concreto,146 liturgical contribution,155–6,159 © Cambridge University Press www.cambridge.org Cambridge University Press 0521772249 - The Cambridge Companion to Reformation Theology Edited by David Bagchi and David C.
Recommended publications
  • Sola Fide and Sola Gratia in Early Christianity
    Salvation sola fide and sola gratia in early Christianity Published in: P.N. Holtrop, F. De Lange, R. Roukema (eds), Passion of Protestants, Kampen 2004, 27-48 Riemer Roukema Martin Luther‟s passion was to proclaim his discovery that man is justified by faith in Christ. This meant to him that, in man‟s relationship with God, he does not have to correspond to God‟s „righteousness‟ by his own „works‟ or efforts, but that God freely bestows the righteousness of Christ on everyone who believes in Christ as Saviour.1 Luther even intro- duced his discovery into his translation of Rom. 3:28. Whereas Paul wrote there that „man is justified by faith apart from works of the law‟, Luther translated that „man is justified without works of the law, only by faith‟.2 Although this translation was fiercely criticized, he vigorously defended it, saying that a version including „only‟ made up a more natural German sentence than without this adverb. Moreover, he referred to Ambrose and Augustine who said before him that faith alone makes one righteous.3 In Latin, „only by faith‟ is sola fide; combined with sola gratia, „only by grace‟, these words became important slogans of Lutheran and Calvinist Protestantism. For sola gratia, one may refer to Rom. 3:24, „justified by his grace as a gift, through the redemption which is in Christ Jesus‟ (RSV), and to Eph. 2:8-9a, „For by grace you have been saved through faith; and this is not your own doing, it is the gift of God, not because of works‟ (RSV).
    [Show full text]
  • The Five Solas of the Reformation
    The Five Solas of the Reformation Contents Background ...................................................................................................................................... 3 Sola Gratia ........................................................................................................................................ 6 Indulgences .................................................................................................................................. 6 Definition of Grace ...................................................................................................................... 7 Grace Alone ................................................................................................................................. 9 Grace is Part of the Character of God ...................................................................................... 9 Grace is Clearly Displayed by the Cross of Jesus .................................................................. 11 Grace is Expressed in Different Ways ................................................................................... 12 Grace is Pure .......................................................................................................................... 14 Grace is Sovereign ................................................................................................................. 14 Grace in Relation to the Law ................................................................................................. 16 Grace is Given
    [Show full text]
  • Turning Point: Luther at the Diet of Worms (1521)
    Turning Point: Luther at the Diet of Worms (1521) Mark Noll, Turning Points, ch. 7 Key texts to start with: The Freedom of a Christian, On the Bondage of the Will, The Babylonian Captivity of the Church, The 95 Theses. Augsburg Confession of the Lutheran churches (1530). Luther on reading and teaching the Gospel narratives. Luther's amazing sermon on John 1:29. Luther's blistering commentary on Galatians. Guys who blog quite a bit on Luther - Ron Frost, Peter Mead, Glen Scrivener. Carl Trueman on Luther at the Clarus Conference 2005 - audio. Martin Luther in 30 minutes from MTC. A Mighty Fortress is Our God: The Story of Martin Luther - available at iServe Africa bookstore Graham Tomlin, Luther and his World – available in the iServe Africa library Michael Reeves, Unquenchable Flame / On Giant’s Shoulders Some of the key issues: Authority of Church versus authority of Word – “my conscience is captive to the Word of God” Against Papacy that Luther saw to be slamming the door to the kingdom in people’s faces, not going in and preventing others from entering Sacraments reduced to Baptism and Lord’s Supper (versus 7 catholic sacraments) Luther’s ‘theology of the Cross’ (from 1517 onwards) - increasingly seeing that the will is bound, can do no good of ourselves (and if we think that we can, that is evil); it is in powerlessness that there is power. This was an extension of Augustinianism that the church could no longer contain. Summary of Alister McGrath’s Luther’s Theology of the Cross, 1985 McGrath starts by placing Luther is his setting as a late medieval theologian of the via moderna.
    [Show full text]
  • Robert D. Hawkins
    LEX OR A NDI LEX CREDENDI THE CON F ESSION al INDI ff ERENCE TO AL TITUDE Robert D. Hawkins t astounds me that, in the twenty-two years I have shared Catholics, as the Ritualists were known, formed the Church Iresponsibility for the liturgical formation of seminarians, of England Protection Society (1859), renamed the English I have heard Lutherans invoke the terms “high church” Church Union (1860), to challenge the authority of English and “low church” as if they actually describe with clar- civil law to determine ecclesiastical and liturgical practice.1 ity ministerial positions regarding worship. It is assumed The Church Association (1865) was formed to prosecute in that I am “high church” because I teach worship and know civil court the “catholic innovations.” Five Anglo-Catholic how to fire up a censer. On occasion I hear acquaintances priests were jailed following the 1874 enactment of the mutter vituperatively about “low church” types, apparently Public Worship Regulation Act for refusing to abide by civil ecclesiological life forms not far removed from amoebae. court injunctions regarding liturgical practices. Such prac- On the other hand, a history of the South Carolina Synod tices included the use of altar crosses, candlesticks, stoles included a passing remark about liturgical matters which with embroidered crosses, bowing, genuflecting, or the use historically had been looked upon in the region with no lit- of the sign of the cross in blessing their congregations.2 tle suspicion. It was feared upon my appointment, I sense, For readers whose ecclesiological sense is formed by that my supposed “high churchmanship” would distract notions about the separation of church and state, such the seminarians from the rigors of pastoral ministry into prosecution seems mind-boggling, if not ludicrous.
    [Show full text]
  • Melanchthon Versus Luther: the Contemporary Struggle
    CONCORDIA THEOLOGICAL QUARTERLY Volume 44, Numbers 2-3 --- - - - JULY 1980 Can the Lutheran Confessions Have Any Meaning 450 Years Later?.................... Robert D. Preus 104 Augustana VII and the Eclipse of Ecumenism ....................................... Sieg bert W. Becker 108 Melancht hon versus Luther: The Contemporary Struggle ......................... Bengt Hagglund 123 In-. Response to Bengt Hagglund: The importance of Epistemology for Luther's and Melanchthon's Theology .............. Wilbert H. Rosin 134 Did Luther and Melanchthon Agree on the Real Presence?.. ....................................... David P. Scaer 14 1 Luther and Melanchthon in America ................................................ C. George Fry 148 Luther's Contribution to the Augsburg Confession .............................................. Eugene F. Klug 155 Fanaticism as a Theological Category in the Lutheran Confessions ............................... Paul L. Maier 173 Homiletical Studies 182 Melanchthon versus Luther: the Contemporary Struggle Bengt Hagglund Luther and Melanchthon in Modern Research In many churches in Scandinavia or in Germany one will find two oil paintings of the same size and datingfrom the same time, representing Martin Luther and Philip Melanchthon, the two prime reformers of the Church. From the point of view of modern research it may seem strange that Melanchthon is placed on the same level as Luther, side by side with him, equal in importance and equally worth remembering as he. Their common achieve- ment was, above all, the renewal of the preaching of the Gospel, and therefore it is deserving t hat their portraits often are placed in the neighborhood of the pulpit. Such pairs of pictures were typical of the nineteenth-century view of Melanchthon and Luther as harmonious co-workers in the Reformation. These pic- tures were widely displayed not only in the churches, but also in many private homes in areas where the Reformation tradition was strong.
    [Show full text]
  • Sola Fide the Relevance of Remembering the Reformation
    Concordia Seminary - Saint Louis Scholarly Resources from Concordia Seminary ConcordiaPages Resources for Ministry 1-1-2018 Sola Fide The Relevance of Remembering the Reformation Erik Herrmann Concordia Seminary, St. Louis, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholar.csl.edu/concordiapages Part of the History of Christianity Commons Recommended Citation Herrmann, Erik, "Sola Fide The Relevance of Remembering the Reformation" (2018). ConcordiaPages. 6. https://scholar.csl.edu/concordiapages/6 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Resources for Ministry at Scholarly Resources from Concordia Seminary. It has been accepted for inclusion in ConcordiaPages by an authorized administrator of Scholarly Resources from Concordia Seminary. For more information, please contact [email protected]. SOLA FIDE THE RELEVANCE OF REMEMBERING THE REFORMATION ERIK HERRMANN pages SOLA FIDE THE RELEVANCE OF REMEMBERING THE REFORMATION ERIK HERRMANN About the Author Erik Herrmann r. Erik Herrmann is associate professor of historical theology, chairman of the Department of Historical Theology, director of Concordia Theology, and director of the Center for Reformation Research at Concordia Seminary, St. Louis. DHerrmann joined the faculty of Concordia Seminary in 2005 after serving as an assistant pastor at Timothy Lutheran Church in St. Louis. He received his Ph.D. (2005) and Master of Divinity (2000) from Concordia Seminary. His earned his bachelor’s degree (1995) from Concordia University Wisconsin. His areas of interest and expertise include the history of biblical interpretation, with a particular focus on Martin Luther and the Reformation period; history of Medieval and Reformation/early modern Europe; 20th–century interpretations of Martin Luther and his theology; and the history of American Lutheranism.
    [Show full text]
  • Content I II IV V
    Content I IV io Forewords 20 Finding Luther 136 Luther as a Monk, Scholar and Preacher io Greeting 22 The Luther Family in Mansfeld Frank-Walter Steinmeier 24 The “ Luther Pit” in Mansfeld: 140 Luther’s Academic Background Federal Minister for Foreign Affairs What their Garbage Tells Us about 145 Leucorea 12 Foreword the Luther Family Harald Meller, Martin Eberle, 154 The Ninety-Five Theses 38 The Counts of Mansfeld and the Copper Ulrike Kretzschmar and Stefan Rhein Shale Mines of Mansfeld 160 From Likeness to Image: 15 Foreword Early Portraits of Luther 44 Dawn of a New Era Kay win Feldman 165 The Imperial Diet of Worms 17 Foreword Colin B. Bailey II 19 Contributors to the Catalogue V 46 Worldly Power and Courtly Art 180 Luther’s Theology 183 Sola Fide - 52 The Emperor and the Papacy Justification by Faith Alone 59 The Joint Exercise of Clerical and 186 Law and Grace- Worldly Power A Pictorial Subject of the Reformation 62 The Rulers of Saxony 198 The Eucharist 73 The Cranach Family in Wittenberg 203 Luther’s Translation of the Bible III 92 Pre-Reformation Piety 94 Parochial Churches and Divine Service prior to the Reformation 114 Piety in the Late Middle Ages 130 The System of Indulgences in the Catholic Church VI VIII 226 Luther in Wittenberg 358 Luther’s Legacy 455 Appendix 230 Hitched with Luther: 363 The Death of Martin Luther 456 References The Marriage between Katharina von 480 Printed Sources 374 In Memory of Luther: Bora and Martin Luther 481 Archival Primary Sources Museum, Memorial and Relic 240 Katharina von Bora (1499-1552)
    [Show full text]
  • Thomas More on Luther's Sola Fide: Just Or Unjust?
    ANGELICUM90 (2013) 761-798 761 Thomas More on Luther's Sola Fide: Just or Unjust? CHRISTOPHER J. MALLOY THE UNIVERSITY OF DALLAS (DALLAS, U.SA.) Thomas More's Dialogue Concerning Heresies contains a sustained, inci­ sive polemic against Luther's doctrine iustificatio sola fide sine operibus or justification by faith alone without works'. Most contemporary schol­ ars, both Catholic and Protestant, hold that the work of the early Catholic controversialists was largely a failure in responding to both the spiritual and theological concerns of Martin Luther2• One chief contention is that the controversialists failed to understand Luther correctly. This essay ar­ gues, against the consensus, that More's presentation of the Lutheran doc­ trine so/a.fide is substantially correct. The Dialogue, composed and edited A.D. 1528-1532, is presented as More's account to Bishop Cuthbert Tunstall (who appointed More cen­ sor of heretical texts) of a lengthy set of his conversations with a certain 1 Thomas MoRE, Dialogue Concerning Heresies, rendered in Modem English by Mary Gottschalk. New York, Scepter Publishers, Inc., 2006, Part IV, §11, 428-55. 2 See David V.N. BAGClll, Luther's Earliest Opponents: Catholic Controversialists 1518-1525. Minneapolis, Fortress Press, 1991, 9-14; Mark U. EDWARDS, Printing, Pro­ paganda, and Martin Luther. Berkeley, University of California Press, 1994, 158; John M. FRYMIRE, The Primacy of the Postils: Catholics, Protestants, and the Dissemination ofIdeas in Early Modern Germany. Leiden, Brill, 2010, 41-42; Joseph LORTZ, "Wert und Grenzen der katholischen Kontroverstheologie in der ersten Hiilfte des 16. Jahrhunderts", in: August FRANZEN, ed, Um Reform und Reformation: Zur Frage nach dem Wesen des "Reformatorischen" bei Martin Luther.
    [Show full text]
  • Retrieval and the Doing of Theology
    Volume 23 · Number 2 Summer 2019 Retrieval and the Doing of Theology Vol. 23 • Num. 2 Retrieval and the Doing of Theology Stephen J. Wellum 3 Editorial: Reflections on Retrieval and the Doing of Theology Kevin J. Vanhoozer 7 Staurology, Ontology, and the Travail of Biblical Narrative: Once More unto the Biblical Theological Breach Stephen J. Wellum 35 Retrieval, Christology, and Sola Scriptura Gregg R. Allison 61 The Prospects for a “Mere Ecclesiology” Matthew Barrett 85 Will the Son Rise on a Fourth Horizon? The Heresy of Contemporaneity within Evangelical Biblicism and the Return of the Hermeneutical Boomerang for Dogmatic Exegesis Peter J. Gentry 105 A Preliminary Evaluation and Critique of Prosopological Exegesis Pierre Constant 123 Promise, Law, and the Gospel: Reading the Biblical Narrative with Paul SBJT Forum 137 Gregg R. Allison 157 Four Theses Concerning Human Embodiment Book Reviews 181 Editor-in-Chief: R. Albert Mohler, Jr. • Editor: Stephen J. Wellum • Associate Editor: Brian Vickers • Book Review Editor: John D. Wilsey • Assistant Editor: Brent E. Parker • Editorial Board: Matthew J. Hall, Hershael York, Paul Akin, Timothy Paul Jones, Kody C. Gibson • Typographer: Benjamin Aho • Editorial Office: SBTS Box 832, 2825 Lexington Rd., Louisville, KY 40280, (800) 626-5525, x 4413 • Editorial E-Mail: [email protected] Editorial: Reflections on Retrieval and the Doing of Theology Stephen J. Wellum Stephen J. Wellum is Professor of Christian Theology at The Southern Baptist Theo- logical Seminary and editor of Southern Baptist
    [Show full text]
  • Infallible?" (Hans Küng, 1970)
    On "Infallible?" (Hans Küng, 1970) First published (in German) as "Unfehlbar?", 1970; transl. E.Mosbacher, Collins, 1971 © C.Jeynes, Guildford, 2nd June 2012 (revised 24th August 2012 and 17th February 2014) Infallibility: a question for all Christians Küng is a prominent German theologian of the Roman Church. He is notorious for attacking Roman doctrines, and, in particular in this book, Infallible?, he attacks the Roman doctrine of Papal infallibility. It was for this book that his licence to teach Roman theology was revoked by the Roman authorities. He remains as emeritus Professor of ecumenical theology at the University of Tübingen. Let me parenthetically comment here that in this review I systematically refer to the "Roman" Church, not the "Roman Catholic" Church, since the question of what is really "catholic" ("universal") is at the heart of this book.1 For example, I would say that Luther was the catholic where the then Pope was the heretic. I would say that any Christian with acceptable doctrine is "catholic" since he or she thereby belongs to the body of believers, the "cloud of witnesses" (Heb.12:1). But is the Roman Church "catholic"? But why should we be interested in such apparently arcane matters of Roman theology? It turns out that we2 have a similar doctrine, of inerrancy: We believe the Bible to be the only inspired, infallible, authoritative Word of God, inerrant in its original manuscripts. http://epsomcf.org.uk/about-us/what-we-believe/ (downloaded 14th May 2012) This statement follows recent conservative theological positions, and in particular the "Chicago Statement on Biblical Inerrancy"3 (1978) which was signed by nearly 300 scholars including J.I.
    [Show full text]
  • The Peace of Augsburg in Three Imperial Cities by Istvan
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by University of Waterloo's Institutional Repository Biconfessionalism and Tolerance: The Peace of Augsburg in Three Imperial Cities by Istvan Szepesi A thesis presented to the University Of Waterloo in fulfilment of the thesis requirement for the degree of Master of Arts in History Waterloo, Ontario, Canada, 2016 © Istvan Szepesi 2016 I hereby declare that I am the sole author of this thesis. This is a true copy of the thesis, including any required final revisions, as accepted by my examiners. I understand that my thesis may be made electronically available to the public. ii Abstract In contrast to the atmosphere of mistrust and division between confessions that was common to most polities during the Reformation era, the Peace of Augsburg, signed in 1555, declared the free imperial cities of the Holy Roman Empire a place where both Catholics and Lutherans could live together in peace. While historians readily acknowledge the exceptional nature of this clause of the Peace, they tend to downplay its historical significance through an undue focus on its long-term failures. In order to challenge this interpretation, this paper examines the successes and failures of the free imperial cities’ implementation of the Peace through a comparative analysis of religious coexistence in Augsburg, Cologne, and Nuremberg during the Peace’s 63- year duration. This investigation reveals that while religious coexistence did eventually fail first in Nuremberg and then in Cologne, the Peace made major strides in the short term which offer important insights into the nature of tolerance and confessional conflict in urban Germany during the late Reformation era.
    [Show full text]
  • JAMES 2:24: RETRANSLATION REQUIRED (Part 1 of 3)
    JAMES 2:24: RETRANSLATION REQUIRED (Part 1 of 3) by John Niemelä Introduction: Sola Fide Requires Sola Scriptura How easy it is to assume sola fide as axiomatic to Christi- anity without comprehending the tremendous battles Martin Lu- ther and other Reformers fought. Luther’s nailing of his 95 Theses to the door of the Church at Wittenburg marked an auspi- cious beginning on October 31, 1517. One of Luther’s greatest contributions to the Reformation was his translation of the Bible into a language accessible to the common man. However trans- lating from Hebrew, Greek and Latin texts into German was a massive task. Did Luther have lexicons of today’s caliber? Did he have access to an established scholarly community dedicated to biblical languages? Did Luther have any of the modern pub- lishing tools let alone a computer? And, yet the Reformation’s success not only depended upon sola fide (faith alone), but also sola Scriptura (Scripture alone). Indeed, Martin Luther and his contemporaries argued that departures from the Scripture authorized by the pope and various councils obscured the biblical doctrine of eternal justification, sola fide. In other words, sola fide was a compelling argument only if sola Scriptura were true. Luther’s enemies not only rejected sola fide, but also sola Scrip- tura, while those who embraced sola fide, of necessity, embraced sola Scriptura. The two doctrines stand or fall together. Luther quickly saw the practical ramifications of sola Scriptura: People who read the Bible for themselves could dis- cover (or verify) that eternal justification comes by faith alone.
    [Show full text]