Bringing Respect to Work 3

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Bringing Respect to Work 3 .0.*`TY\yn -MVY^T7HY[ULYPHL[O*`TY\ .^LP[OPVTL^U7HY[ULYPHL[O 5/:>HSLZ >LSZO7HY[ULYZOPW-VY\T >VYRPUNPU7HY[ULYZOPW >VYRPUNPU7HY[ULYZOPW )YPUNPUN9LZWLJ[[V>VYR (+PNUP[`H[>VYR7VSPJ` MVY5/:>HSLZ Acknowledgements ;OHURZHYLYLJVYKLK[V[OL)LULÄ[Z(NLUJ`MVY[OLPYRPUKWLYTPZZPVU[VYLWYVK\JLHZLJ[PVUVM [OLPYWVSPJ`9LMLYLUJLYLMLYZ ;OHURZHYLYLJVYKLK[V[OL:JV[[PZO7HY[ULYZOPW-VY\TMVYWYV]PKPUN[OLMV\UKH[PVU[V [OPZN\PKHUJLMYVT,SPTPUH[PUN)\SS`PUNHUK/HYHZZTLU[PU[OL>VYRWSHJL *VU[YPI\[PVUZHUKHK]PJLNYH[LM\SS`YLJLP]LKMYVT7HT3\JRVJRHUK;YHJL`.VVKLMYVT[OL *LU[YLMVY,X\HSP[`HUK/\THU9PNO[Z"=PJ[VYPH(SSLU)YV4VYNHUU^N5/:;Y\Z[":\L1LURPUZ 7VU[`WYPKK 9OVUKKH5/:;Y\Z["/PSHY`/VWRPUZMYVT5/:>HSLZ/9+P]PZPVU>LSZO(ZZLTIS` .V]LYUTLU["7H\S7HYZVUZ:,+<"YL^YP[[LUI`+LIVYHO7VY[LY>LSZO7HY[ULYZOPW-VY\T 1V+H]PLZ+PYLJ[VYVM[OL*LU[YLMVY,X\HSP[`HUK/\THU9PNO[ZHUK:[L]L:SVHU<50;, (40*<:)YHUJO G/136/07-08 November Typeset in 12pt ISBN 978 0 7504 4290 9 CMK-22-04-030(118) © Crown Copyright 2007 >VYRPUNPU7HY[ULYZOPW )YPUNPUN9LZWLJ[[V>VYR *VU[LU[Z Page Foreword by Edwina Hart AM MBE Minister for Health and Social Services 1 Introduction - Bringing Respect to Work 3 1. The Need for Guidance 5 2. Principles and Values 7 3. Legal Framework and Relevant Legislation 9 +LÄUP[PVUVM)\SS`PUN +LÄUP[PVUVM/HYHZZTLU[ 6. Strategic Framework and Organisational Culture 16 6.1 Strategic Framework 16 6.1.1 Organisational Development 16 6.1.2 Policyand Procedure 17 6.1.3 Communication 17 6.1.4 Training 18 6.1.5 Support 18 6.2 Organisational Culture 18 6.3 What does a postive working environment look like? 19 7. Firm, Fair Management vs Bullying and Harassment 8. Bullying and Harassment by Others 22 9. Raising Awareness 23 9.1 Training Implications 23 9.2 Training and Implementation 23 ;YHPUPUN:\WLY]PZPVU:\WWVY[MVY*VUÄKLU[PHS*VU[HJ[Z 9.4 Resources 24 +L]LSVWTLU[0TWSLTLU[H[PVUHUK*VTT\UPJH[PVUVM7VSPJ` 25 11. Indicators of Success and Basis for Evaluation 27 12. Conclusions 28 Appendix 1 - Model Dignity at Work Policy 29 Appendix 2 - Legal Framework 35 Appendix 3 - Policy Checklist 38 Appendix 4 - Evidence Base and References 39 1 -VYL^VYKI`,K^PUH/HY[(44), 4PUPZ[LYMVY/LHS[OHUK:VJPHS:LY]PJLZ This guidance has a simple objective, to ensure that staff, patients and visitors in [OL5/:PU>HSLZJHUILJVUÄKLU[[OH[[OL`^PSSÄUKHZHMLZ\WWVY[P]LLU]PYVUTLU[ in which people feel able to freely express their needs and differences. It is also fundamental to ensuring that the human rights of everyone working in and being cared MVYI`[OL5/:HYLWYV[LJ[LKYLZWLJ[LKHUKM\SÄSSLK It requires every member of staff to demonstrate supportive behaviour that protects the dignity of others and values difference. It is essential that everyone realises the impact of certain behaviour. It is not acceptable to use bullying as an excuse for incompetence or under-performance. This document provides guidance as to how to behave in the workplace and is a living policy that is part of a suite of guidance which should not be taken in isolation. I believe that leadership is crucial to the successful development of this fair and open culture, and it is therefore vital that the aims of this guidance are fully endorsed by the governing Boards of every health organisation and that everyone in a leadership WVZP[PVUKLTVUZ[YH[LZ[OLWVZP[P]LILOH]PV\YZPKLU[PÄLK The premise of this policy guideline is to recognise that it is important that there is LHYS`YLZVS\[PVUVMJVUÅPJ[PU[OL^VYRWSHJLPMHUK^OLUP[VJJ\YZHUK[OH[KHTHNLK relationships are repaired as soon as possible. It is everybody’s responsibility to co- create this culture of dignity and to ensure they truly are bringing respect to work. 2 3 0U[YVK\J[PVU )YPUNPUN9LZWLJ[[V>VYR ,SPTPUH[PUN)\SS`PUNHUK/HYHZZTLU[PU[OL>VYRWSHJL ;OL5/:PU>HSLZOHZLTIHYRLKVUHTHQVYYLJVUÄN\YH[PVUVMZLY]PJLKLSP]LY`\UKLY ‘Designed for Life’ with the clear aim of building an NHS and Social Care Service that provides high quality services that are fashioned to meet the individual needs of patients and clients. The human resources impact of this challenge is immense and a supportive environment at all levels is essential if management of the changes ahead are to be successful. This is especially true if we want to create the practices which will make NHS Wales organisations employers of choice in an increasingly competitive labour market. The Chief Executive for NHS Wales, Ann Lloyd, made it clear in her introduction to the NHS Wales Workforce Strategy ‘Designed to Work’, that “Human Resource Departments must respond to the demands of the service by ensuring strategies are in place and that HR effort is concentrated on achieving change…” The legislative requirement to Equality Impact Assess Trust and LHB employment policies and procedures has dramatically increased the work required to meet this challenge. Fortunately NHS Wales has a culture of partnership working to enable employees via their representatives to work with employers to resolve such challenges. This is a culture which the Welsh Assembly Government agrees is the right way to move ‘Designed to Work’ forward. The Employment Practices Sub Group of the Welsh Partnership Forum ensured its work programme would provide support for NHS Wales employers, and proposed to carry out a discrete piece of work to provide a Dignity at Work Policy Guideline, based on the principles established in Section 32 of the Agenda for Change Terms and Conditions. However, during the equality impact assessment of this draft policy it became apparent to the Task and Finish group undertaking this work, that to succeed in bringing respect to work a review of all HR policies and procedures was required to ensure that they did not have any adverse effect on the creation of a culture of mutual respect for NHS Wales. 4 As a result of this conclusion the Welsh Partnership Forum have agreed that this WVSPJ`N\PKLSPULIL[OLÄYZ[PUHM\SSZ\P[LVMLX\HSP[`PTWHJ[HZZLZZLKWVSPJPLZ and procedures. 0[PZYPNO[[OH[º)YPUNPUN9LZWLJ[[V>VYR»PZ[OLÄYZ[WVSPJ`N\PKLSPULPU[OPZZ\P[L Its aim is to begin the process of creating a culture of mutual respect in NHS Wales. It sets out a number of core standards that will be expected of all NHS staff, and establishes the benchmark against which the rest of the suite will be measured. It is a living document and will change in the light of new legislative frameworks or operational experience. 0[PZ[OLÄYZ[Z[LWPUJYLH[PUNHUL[OVZPU5/:>HSLZMVYLTWSV`LLZTHUHNLYZ contractors, patients and their relatives of ‘doing unto others as you would have them do unto you’. Steve Sloan UNITE, AMICUS Branch Welsh Partnership Forum 5 ;OL5LLKMVY.\PKHUJL 1.1 ;OLYLPZZPNUPÄJHU[L]PKLUJL[VKLTVUZ[YH[L[OH[[OLSL]LSZVMWLYMVYTHUJL QVIZH[PZMHJ[PVULTWSV`LL^LSMHYLHUKH[[LUKHUJLHYLPUÅ\LUJLKI`[OL culture and working environment of an organisation. The TUC, individual trades unions, ACAS, the CIPD, DTI and the CBI together with special interest organisations such as the Andrea Adams Trust and The Field Foundation all detail extensive research into the effects of organisations cultures and behaviours.[see Appendix 4] Evidence obtained from numerous surveys suggest that bullying and harassment in the workplace is a serious issue which employers must address. [see Appendix 4] Employers have a legal and ethical responsibility as a reasonable employer to ensure that the staff they employ are not subjected to inappropriate behaviour which may not only affect their performance but more importantly their health and well-being. 1.2 Bullying and harassment can take many forms, occur for a variety of reasons and may be directed at individuals or groups. Due to the fact that incidents of bullying and harassment are often misunderstood, badly misinterpreted and largely unrecognised in the workplace, it is necessary to have written KLÄUP[PVUZ[VHWWYLJPH[L[OLUH[\YLVM[OLILOH]PV\Y;OLLMMLJ[ZNVIL`VUK [OL^VYKZVMHU`KLÄUP[PVUHUK[OLWYVISLTZVMUV[PKLU[PM`PUNP[JHUOH]L devastating effects on the personal performance and well-being of individuals, as well as the overall effectiveness of the organisation. 1.3 Bullying and harassment impacts upon the individual/group being harassed, on their colleagues and on the organisation as a whole. Intimidation in any form leads to underperformance at work. If ignored, incidents of bullying and harassment lead to, and perpetuate, a working environment in which it is unpleasant to work. People cannot contribute their best or work well in teams when they fear bullying, harassment or abuse. Bullying and harassment causes demoralisation, stress, anxiety and sickness. There are also hidden psychological and social effects on the person being bullied or harassed as well as on their family and friends. 1.4 The cost of bullying and harassment to an organisation can be looked at in terms of under performance, sickness and absence rates, costs of recruiting and retraining staff, legal action and tribunal proceedings (with unlimited 6 compensation in sex, race, disability and protected disclosure cases) and possible loss of public image. Legally employees within the National Health Service in Wales (NHS) are responsible for the health and safety of employees as well as the patients within its care. The onus is, therefore, on the good employer to foresee the potential for bullying and harassment and to take reasonable steps to reduce the risk and take action where incidents are raised. 1.5 All of those involved in the workplace must recognise their own responsibilities (be it as employer, employee, trade union/professional organisation representative, patient, relative, advocate, representative of another organisation or contractor) to be alert to bullying and harassment when it occurs. Unacceptable behaviour must not occur and, when it does, must not be allowed to continue unchecked.
Recommended publications
  • An Experimental Study of the Effects of Workforce Bullying on Three Affective Constructs: Self-Efficacy, Satisfaction and Stress Elizabeth A
    Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Doctoral Dissertations Graduate School 2009 An experimental study of the effects of workforce bullying on three affective constructs: self-efficacy, satisfaction and stress Elizabeth A. Nealy Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_dissertations Part of the Human Resources Management Commons Recommended Citation Nealy, Elizabeth A., "An experimental study of the effects of workforce bullying on three affective constructs: self-efficacy, satisfaction and stress" (2009). LSU Doctoral Dissertations. 2344. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_dissertations/2344 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Doctoral Dissertations by an authorized graduate school editor of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please [email protected]. AN EXPERIMENTAL STUDY OF THE EFFECTS OF WORKFORCE BULLYING ON THREE AFFECTIVE CONSTRUCTS: SELF-EFFICACY, SATISFACTION AND STRESS A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in The School of Human Resource Education and Workforce Development by Elizabeth A. Nealy B.S., University of Phoenix, 2001 M.M.C., Louisiana State University, 2004 August 2009 ©Copyright 2008 Elizabeth A. Nealy All rights reserved ii Dedication I dedicate this work to the legacy of my first example of a transformational leader, my grandfather and hero, Rudolph Newman “R.N.” Ball. His home-spun wisdom served as a framework through which I would judge all of life’s experiences.
    [Show full text]
  • Parent & Student Handbook 2019-2020
    Sports Leadership and Management Academy Charter Middle/High School Parent & Student Handbook 2019-2020 1095 Fielders St. Henderson, NV 89011 702.473.5735 www.slamnv.org Dear Parents and Students, Welcome to an exciting year at SLAM—Sports Leadership and Management—Academy. SLAM is a public charter school serving grades 6-12. Parents are an integral part of our school’s success and we gladly welcome your input and suggestions throughout the year. Your collaboration is essential in promoting our school’s mission as we continue to place an emphasis on individual student achievement by nurturing a positive learning environment which will enable our students to become confident, self-directed, responsible life-long learners. We are looking forward to a rewarding and exciting year. On behalf of the administration, faculty, and staff we assure you that we are committed to SLAM’s vision to provide an innovative challenging curriculum in a learning environment that promotes individualized instruction for all of our students. We are honored and thank you for selecting us as your School of Choice! 2 General Information Charter School Information As defined by the National Alliance of Public Charter Schools (www.publiccharters.org), Charter schools are independent public schools allowed freedom to be more innovative, while being held accountable for improved student achievement. Charter schools are non-profit, self-managed entities that enroll public school students. They are approved and monitored by the Nevada State Charter Authority; yet, they run independently of one another. Charter schools are funded by state and local monies and are open to any student residing in Nevada who would otherwise qualify to attend a regular public school in the state of Nevada.
    [Show full text]
  • Peterhouse Crushes Student Ball Protests
    Commentp16 Robert Should private Redford talks education be Hollywood, abolished? politics, and Lions for Lambs For ladies who live the leisurely life Interview p26 Fashionp20 Issue No 665 Friday November 9 2007 varsity.co.uk e Independent Cambridge Student Newspaper since 1947 University Peterhouse crushes Nursery fails Ofsted report Emma Inkester Senior Reporter student ball protests The University Nursery at West Cambridge has failed its recent Ofsted inspection, according to a » Condemnation of college as students threatened with fi nes damning report released this week. The nursery, which provides childcare for approximately 100 Camilla Temple removed the posters from students’ student parents at Cambridge Chief News Editor rooms without consent. Although University, was judged to be inad- two students claimed to have left equate in all fi ve areas in which it Peterhouse College have attempted their bins outside their rooms, the was examined on October 19. This to suppress student protests over the bedders reportedly came later in the resulted in a complete failure of the cancellation of this year’s May ball. day and removed the posters. inspection and a notice stating that The protests were sparked by The protestor responsible for the nursery does not meet the Na- frustration at both the fellows’ and the posters told Varsity, “If the fel- tional Standards for Under Eights the JCR’s handling of the situation lows were willing to talk to us we Day Care and Childminding. and were spurred on by national wouldn’t need to do this. It’s a way The report detailed how only media attention.
    [Show full text]
  • Bullying and Harassment of Doctors in the Workplace Report
    Health Policy & Economic Research Unit Bullying and harassment of doctors in the workplace Report May 2006 improving health Health Policy & Economic Research Unit Contents List of tables and figures . 2 Executive summary . 3 Introduction. 5 Defining workplace bullying and harassment . 6 Types of bullying and harassment . 7 Incidence of workplace bullying and harassment . 9 Who are the bullies? . 12 Reporting bullying behaviour . 14 Impacts of workplace bullying and harassment . 16 Identifying good practice. 18 Areas for further attention . 20 Suggested ways forward. 21 Useful contacts . 22 References. 24 Bullying and harassment of doctors in the workplace 1 Health Policy & Economic Research Unit List of tables and figures Table 1 Reported experience of bullying, harassment or abuse by NHS medical and dental staff in the previous 12 months, 2005 Table 2 Respondents who have been a victim of bullying/intimidation or discrimination while at medical school or on placement Table 3 Course of action taken by SAS doctors in response to bullying behaviour experienced at work (n=168) Figure 1 Source of bullying behaviour according to SAS doctors, 2005 Figure 2 Whether NHS trust takes effective action if staff are bullied and harassed according to medical and dental staff, 2005 2 Bullying and harassment of doctors in the workplace Health Policy & Economic Research Unit Executive summary • Bullying and harassment in the workplace is not a new problem and has been recognised in all sectors of the workforce. It has been estimated that workplace bullying affects up to 50 per cent of the UK workforce at some time in their working lives and costs employers 80 million lost working days and up to £2 billion in lost revenue each year.
    [Show full text]
  • Workplace Bullying in United Kingdom
    Workplace Bullying in United Kingdom Helge Hoel University of Manchester Background Interest in and awareness of the issue of workplace bullying emerged in the UK in the early 1990s. Through a series of radio-programmes the journalist and broadcaster Andrea Adams, who is believed to have originally coined the term workplace bullying , explored the problem and its significance in UK workplaces. The programmes and the following media debate functioned as an eye-opener for a wider audience and, with the landmark publication of the book Bullying at work: How to confront it and overcome it (Adams, 1992), the interest in the issue quickly gained momentum. Within a time-span of less than ten years, the phenomenon of bullying found a resonance with large sections of the British public. Supported by empirical evidence (e.g. Hoel, Cooper and Faragher, 2001; UNISON, 1997, Quine 1999), suggesting that a substantial proportion of the UK working population perceived themselves to be bullied, with implications for individuals, organisations and society alike, the issue gradually moved upwards on the agenda of trade unions, organisations within the private and the public sectors, as well as within Governmental agencies. Current situation with regard to workplace bullying Prevalence In terms of prevalence, although methodologies by which evidence has been obtained vary, most studies have reported figures in the order of 10-20%. For example, Hoel and Cooper (2000) in a random nationwide survey involving 70 organisations with altogether more than one million employees, found that 10.6% of respondents reported themselves to be bullied. Whilst a study in a large multinational organisation reported that 15% considered themselves bullied (Cowie et al., 2000), other studies carried out with trade union members have often reported even higher figures, with a recent study of members of the largest UK public-sector union reporting a figure of 34% (UNISON, 2009).
    [Show full text]
  • U.S. Workplace Bullying: Some Basic Considerations and Consultation Interventions
    See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/232570632 U.S. Workplace bullying: Some basic considerations and consultation interventions. Article in Consulting Psychology Journal Practice and Research · September 2009 DOI: 10.1037/a0016670 CITATIONS READS 39 547 2 authors, including: Gary Namie Workplace Bullying Institute 11 PUBLICATIONS 155 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects: 2017 WBI U.S. Workplace Bullying Survey View project workplace bullying View project All content following this page was uploaded by Gary Namie on 12 June 2014. The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file. U.S. Workplace Bullying: Some Basic Considerations and Consultation Interventions Gary Namie, PhD, and Ruth Namie, PhD Workplace Bullying Institute Consulting Psychology Journal Special Issue: Workplace Bullying and Mobbing: Organizational Consultation Strategies September, 2009 Abstract Bullying in the workplace is a world-wide phenomenon. There is a sizeable professional literature on workplace bullying is based largely on studies in European and other countries in comparison to studies involving U.S. corporations. Psychological consultants to U.S. corporations need to know and understand how certain consid- erations such as prevalence, legal reform and issues, and employers’ response to bullying differs in the U.S. compared to other countries. A multi-methodological typology is introduced and evaluated for application in U.S. bullying consultations. A case study illustrates the integration of methodologies and predictors of successful inter- ventions. Historical Roots of Mobbing and Bullying clinician, a researcher, author of popular books, Research on adult bullying began in the and the first public activist and uncompromising 1980’s with physician Heinz Leymann’s (1990) spokesperson for the movement he launched.
    [Show full text]
  • Bullying and Harassment in the Workplace
    Footwear, Leather, Textile and Clothing Industries Health & Safety Committee BULLYING AND HARASSMENT IN THE WORKPLACE A preventative guide for the footwear and leather industries BULLYING & HARASSMENT IN THE WORKPLACE – A GUIDE TO PREVENTION INTRODUCTION Everyone should be treated with dignity and respect at work. Bullying and harassment of any kind are in no-one’s interests and should not be tolerated in the workplace. If you are being bullied or harassed it can be difficult to know what to do about it. Millions of workers suffer bullying and harassment in the course of their jobs, scarring workplaces and ruining lives. Despite legislation nearly thirty years ago on sex and race discrimination, these problems are still rife. Concerns about other forms of harassment on grounds of age, sexual orientation, disability and religion or belief have been highlighted by unions and campaigners. Bullying costs employers eighty million working days and up to £2 billion in lost revenue every year. Nearly half a million people in the UK experience work related stress and the financial costs associated are estimated at £3.8 billion per year. The objective of this guidance note is to assist employers and employees to prevent ill health caused by bullying and harassment by using the practical tips and guidance provided in this document. WHAT THE LAW SAYS There is no specific legislation in the UK dealing with the issues of workplace bullying, but a number of areas of law may be relevant and applicable: Data Protection Act 1998 Equalities Act 2010 (amends the Disability Discrimination Acts 2004 and 1995) Employment Act 2002 (Dispute Resolution) Regulations 2004 Employment Rights Act 1996 Health and Safety at Work Act 1974 Published 07/09 2 Revised 09/15 BULLYING & HARASSMENT IN THE WORKPLACE – A GUIDE TO PREVENTION Protection from Harassment Act 2012 Management of Health & Safety Regulations 1992 (amended 1999) Race Relations Act 1976 Sex Discrimination Act 1975 Employment Equality (Religion or Belief) Regulations 2003 (Amendment) (No.
    [Show full text]
  • How Canadian News Frames Cyberbullying As a Social Problem
    University of Calgary PRISM: University of Calgary's Digital Repository Graduate Studies The Vault: Electronic Theses and Dissertations 2015-04-29 Reification of the Teenage Victim: How Canadian News Frames Cyberbullying as a Social Problem Felt, J. Mylynn Felt, J. M. (2015). Reification of the Teenage Victim: How Canadian News Frames Cyberbullying as a Social Problem (Unpublished master's thesis). University of Calgary, Calgary, AB. doi:10.11575/PRISM/27593 http://hdl.handle.net/11023/2177 master thesis University of Calgary graduate students retain copyright ownership and moral rights for their thesis. You may use this material in any way that is permitted by the Copyright Act or through licensing that has been assigned to the document. For uses that are not allowable under copyright legislation or licensing, you are required to seek permission. Downloaded from PRISM: https://prism.ucalgary.ca UNIVERSITY OF CALGARY Reification of the Teenage Victim: How Canadian News Frames Cyberbullying as a Social Problem by J. Mylynn Watson Felt A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF GRADUATE STUDIES IN PARTIAL FULFILMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ARTS GRADUATE PROGRAM IN COMMUNICATION AND CULTURE CALGARY, ALBERTA April, 2015 © J. Mylynn W. Felt 2015 Abstract This study utilizes framing theory to conduct a mixed method content analysis of Canadian print news coverage of four high-profile teen suicides linked with cyberbullying. Results demonstrate that print news discourse frames cyberbullying as a social problem. News coverage of these deaths emphasizes more female victims than males, demonstrating a predisposition to focus on more ideal victims in the construction of social problems.
    [Show full text]
  • Bullying and Harassment: Building a Culture of Dignity and Respect
    Bullying and Harassment Building a Culture of Dignity and Respect Paul Suff Marie Strebler Published by: INSTITUTE FOR EMPLOYMENT STUDIES Mantell Building University of Sussex Falmer Brighton BN1 9RF UK Tel. + 44 (0) 1273 686751 Fax + 44 (0) 1273 690430 http://www.employment‐studies.co.uk Copyright © 2006 Institute for Employment Studies No part of this publication may be reproduced or used in any form by any means— graphic, electronic or mechanical including photocopying, recording, taping or information storage or retrieval systems—without prior permission in writing from the Institute for Employment Studies. The Institute for Employment Studies The Institute for Employment Studies is an independent, apolitical, international centre of research and consultancy in human resource issues. It works closely with employers in the manufacturing, service and public sectors, government departments, agencies, and professional and employee bodies. For over 35 years the Institute has been a focus of knowledge and practical experience in employment and training policy, the operation of labour markets and human resource planning and development. IES is a not‐for‐profit organisation which has over 60 multidisciplinary staff and international associates. IES expertise is available to all organisations through research, consultancy, publications and the Internet. IES aims to help bring about sustainable improvements in employment policy and human resource management. IES achieves this by increasing the understanding and improving the practice of key decision makers in policy bodies and employing organisations. The IES Research Networks This report is the product of a study supported by the IES Research Networks, through which Members finance, and often participate in, applied research on employment issues.
    [Show full text]
  • Social Dominance, Bullying and Early Adolescent Boys
    “Sticks and Stones”: Social Dominance, Bullying and Early Adolescent Boys LEIGH ANDREA ADAMS (203505613) Submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Masters of Social Science (Clinical Psychology) in the School of Psychology Faculty of Humanities, Development and Social Sciences University of KwaZulu Natal, Howard College SUPERVISOR: DR K. GOVENDER November 2009 DECLARATION I, LEIGH ANDREA ADAMS, do hereby declare that this research report entitled: “Sticks and Stones”: Social Dominance, Bullying and Early Adolescent Boys is the result of my own investigation and research. All citations, references and borrowed texts have been duly acknowledged. This work has not been submitted before for any other degree or examination at any other university. Signature: _____________________ Student Number: 203 505 613 Date: November 2009 i ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I wish to express my sincerest gratitude to the following individuals: Thank you to my dedicated supervisor, Dr Kaymarlin Govender. His guidance and support has been invaluable throughout this research project and also in refining me as a researcher. I am truly grateful for his open and enthusiastic approach which has allowed me to develop my critical thinking. I thank him for his ongoing confidence in my abilities and his genuine motivation to push his students towards fulfilling their personal and professional goals. I wish to thank all the participants in the study as well as the staff and school principal for availing their time and resources to me. Special thanks to Mrs P. Ellis for assisting me in gaining entry to the school. It was a pleasure to engage with the young men and I wish them all the best in their future endeavours.
    [Show full text]
  • Thesis Submitted for Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in The
    Prefaces THE UNIVERSITY OF HULL CONTRIBUTION OF PERSONALITY FACTORS TO BULLYING IN THE WORKPLACE Being a thesis submitted for degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the University of Hull ," by Elizabeth Seigne M.A. (Dublin), M.A. (Keele) December, 2002. Prefaces "Over the past 20 years, I have gone into organisations to try and understand with them how groups and individuals work together. The fallible, unreasonable part of myself has stood me in good stead and helped me to understand the irrational, the sadistic, the vengeful, and the aggression that can lie just below the surface of organisations festering one day, bursting out another" (Crawford, 2001, p. 21). Prefaces TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION ONE: LITERATURE REVIEWS Page numbers CHAPTER ONE: GENERAL LITERATURE REVIEW OF BULLYING Introduction 1 Part One: Definitions of bullying 3 Power relationships 15 Persistency, Duration and Frequency 16 Intent and Acknowledgement 17 Part two: Bullying in Schools 19 Types of bullying behaviour 19 Prevalence of school bullying 21 Characteristics of victims and bullies 25 Relevance of school studies to workplace bullying 28 Part three; Workplace bullying. 31 Publications 31 Bullying behaviour 34 Measuring bullying at work 36 Prevalence of workplace bullying 38 Aggression 41 Stress 42 Explanations of workplace bullying 44 Organisational factors 45 Characteristics inherent in human organisations 49 Personality 52 Status within organisations 53 Gender differences and sexual harassment 55 Age 58 Effects of workplace bullying 59 Action taken by victims 63
    [Show full text]
  • SURVIVAL of the FITTEST? Improving Life Chances for Care Leavers
    SURVIVAL OF THE FITTEST? Improving life chances for care leavers January 2014 contents Contents About the Centre for Social Justice 2 Acknowledgements 3 Executive Summary 4 Introduction 11 1 Making the move to independence 18 1.1 Early exits from care 19 1.2 Safe, stable and suitable accommodation 22 1.3 Preparation for leaving 23 2 Education and employment 27 2.1 Education 27 2.2 Employment 30 2.3 Barriers to education and employment 32 2.4 Should education and employment have equal priority? 37 3 Care leavers and extreme outcomes 39 3.1 Homelessness 39 3.2 Prison 40 3.3 Early pregnancy 42 3.4 Drugs and alcohol 43 3.5 Significant mental health problems 44 4 Relationships 48 4.1 Loneliness and isolation amongst care leavers 48 4.2 The effects of relationships 49 4.3 Why young people lose relationships 51 5 Conclusion 59 Appendix 1 60 Appendix 11 62 Survival of the Fittest? | Contents 1 About the Centre for Social Justice The Centre for Social Justice (CSJ) aims to put social justice at the heart of British politics. Our policy development is rooted in the wisdom of those working to tackle Britain’s deepest social problems and the experience of those whose lives have been affected by poverty. Our Working Groups are non-partisan, comprising prominent academics, practitioners and policy makers who have expertise in the relevant fields. We consult nationally and internationally, especially with charities and social enterprises, who are the champions of the welfare society. In addition to policy development, the CSJ has built an alliance of poverty fighting organisations that reverse social breakdown and transform communities.
    [Show full text]