ZUTO 014 01-Nethanel.Indd

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

ZUTO 014 01-Nethanel.Indd zutot �4 (�0�7) ���-��4 ZUTOT: Perspectives on Jewish Culture brill.com/zuto brill.com/zuto The Non-Reading Reader: European Hebrew Literature at the Turn of the 20th Century Lilach Nethanel Bar-Ilan University Abstract European Hebrew literature presents a challenge to the study of early-twentieth- century national literature. By the end of the nineteenth century, the reading of mod- ern Hebrew in Europe was neither part of a religious practice, nor did it merely satisfy a purely aesthetic inclination. It mainly functioned as an ideological means used by a minority of Jews to support the linguistic-national Jewish revival. However, some fun- damental contradictions put into question the actual influence of this literature on the political sphere. This article asks a series of questions about this period in the history of Hebrew readership: How did the non-spoken Hebrew language come to produce popular Hebrew writings? How did this literature engage the common Jewish reader? In this article I propose a new consideration of Hebrew reading practices. I argue for the inclusion of the non-reading readers as important contributors to the constitution of the Jewish literary nation. Keywords modern Hebrew literature – Hebrew readership – history of reading Non-reading The study of literacy in Europe, as it was conducted by sociologists, historians and literary scholars who studied the reception of literary texts, has defined the reader as the main figure when it came to the pedagogical, aesthetic and political transformations of modern society.1 The study of modern reading 1 See, for instance, the relationship between print and radical movements in 18th-century England, as described by Wittman: ‘with the multiplication of production and reception © koninklijke brill nv, leiden, ���6 | doi �0.��63/�8750��4-��Downloaded34��84 from Brill.com09/27/2021 12:09:28AM via free access The Non-Reading Reader 113 in Europe examines the social conditions that allowed the spread of literacy, while taking into account population growth throughout time.2 The theory of reception underlines the prominent role of the reader in the constitution of the meaning of the text.3 The construct of ‘the ideal or idealized reader,’4 who underlines the construction of textual meaning, turns into a historical com- munity of readers that holds considerable political and economic power. It appears that these definitions have overlooked the contribution of the educated non-reading reader to modern literature’s evolvement into a source of socio-political power. Non-reading was firstly defined by major historians of reading such as Atlick and Chartier. They consistently associated it with the illiterate lower classes and regarded non-reading as a barrier to the spread of literacy.5 In a meaningful contrast with this approach, my argument is that non-reading was developed by and for the sake of the literate. As such it differs from ‘unruly reading,’ ‘indirect literacy’ and other extensive readings which are associated with the illiterate or the ‘common’ reader.6 Non-reading marks a hermeneutic preference for the blank spaces over the black letters on the densely printed pages of the most popular genres of 19th-century literature: the periodical and the novel. Non-reading is sustained by paratextual infor- mation such as covers, titles, editions, woodcuts and other illustrations that of the novel in late 18th century the mania for reading novels assumed a sociopolitical dimension for the first time.’ R. Wittman, ‘Was There a Reading Revolution at the End of the Eighteenth Century?,’ in G. Cavallo and R. Chartier, ed., A History of Reading in the West (tr. Lydia G. Cochrane), (Amherst, MA 1999) 304. 2 R.D. Atlick, The English Common Reader: A Social History of the Mass Reading Public 1800– 1900 (Chicago/London 1957); R. Chartier, Les origines culturelles de la révolution Française (Paris 1990). 3 20th-century reception theory, starting with the work of Hans Robert Jauss including reader- response theory and its different developments in the field of literary studies (Wolfgang Iser, Stanley Fish and others) as in the field of cultural studies (Stuart Hall), is an important refer- ence which demands further development. However, the question of the reader’s constitu- tion of the literary object remains a key concept. 4 S. Fish, Is There a Text in This Class? The Authority of Interpretive Communities (Cambridge, MA 1980) 48. 5 See for example Atlick’s overview of the conditions of living in Victorian England, from the diffusion of print, to home lighting and the use of spectacles. Atlick, The English Common Reader, 98. 6 Modern changes in reading practices are often defined by the use of the terms ‘extensive’ and ‘intensive’ readings. Intensive reading refers to a repetitive and thorough reading of a limited collection of texts, while extensive reading could be defined as ‘an eagerness to consume new and varied reading materials for information, and for private entertainment in particular.’ R. Wittemann, ‘Reading Revolution,’ 285. zutot 14 (2017) 112-124 Downloaded from Brill.com09/27/2021 12:09:28AM via free access 114 Nethanel accompany the text, as well as by the author’s name.7 These elements enabled one to treat a large corpus of printed texts by focusing on white spaces, bold titles, author’s signature and illustrations. The practice of non-reading is a required skill based on a reconstruction of the literary object by its partial manifestations. Hence, in order to fully understand the constitution of the ‘great’ literary oeuvres one should take into account the ‘great’ unread.8 The history of literature must therefore be per- ceived not only in terms of a characterization of its readers, but also by a con- sideration of its non-reading readers. Pierre Bayard already suggested a detailed description of this practice in Comment parler des livres que l’on n’a pas lus?9 Most of the time, says Bayard, we discuss books we have not actually, or, at least, completely read. Each of us is, at times, a non-reading reader, when we skip a paragraph in a book, or when we discuss Joyce’s or Balzac’s writing which impressed us though we only read some fragments from their prose. But non-reading demands further reflection, since it suggests that what was not (yet) read is an inseparable part of the formation of literary meaning. Literature is introduced into the political and social spheres not only by being read, but also by the anticipations and expectations it generates. This article focuses on a particular historical case of non-reading, which can be detected in late-19th-century European Hebrew literature. Modern Hebrew literature draws a particular attention to some of the aspects of the non- reading reader, as it illustrates the important role of non-reading in the consti- tution of modern literatures. This article addresses the limited Hebrew literacy of European Jewry while exploring the unprecedented expansion of diverse popular Hebrew writings from the middle of the 19th century to the first decade of the 20th century. It focuses on a key period which combines two historical phenomena: the grow- ing engagement of modern Hebrew literature in the nation-building project, 7 The importance of paratextual information, initially noted by Gerard Genette, was recently developed in Shlomo Berger’s book Producing Redemption in Amsterdam: Early Modern Yiddish Books in Paratextual Perspective (Leiden 2013). 8 The ‘great unread,’ a term Margaret Cohen coined in 1999, refers to what she calls ‘the dusty documents neglected in libraries,’ containing the ‘non-canonical and forgotten [pre-realis- tic] novels’; ‘the vast number of books out there.’ M. Cohen, The Sentimental Education of the Novel (Princeton, NJ 1999) 23. This term was further developed by Franco Moretti. See mainly F. Moretti, ‘Conjectures on World Literature’, in his Distant Reading (London/New York 2015) 43–62. 9 P. Bayard, Comment parler des livres que l’on n’a pas lus? (Paris 2007). Downloadedzutot from 14 Brill.com09/27/2021 (2017) 112-124 12:09:28AM via free access The Non-Reading Reader 115 and the declining numbers of Hebrew readers as attested by Hebrew authors of the time. The Non-reading Hebrew Reader The 19th-century Hebrew poet Judah Leib Gordon assumed that future genera- tions of European Jewry would not embrace the modernization of Hebrew lan- guage and literature. In his 1871 poem, ‘Le-mi ani ʿamel’ (For whom do I toil?) Gordon claimed that once assimilated Jews gain linguistic access and develop an aesthetic sensibility to European culture, they will prefer to become readers of Russian, German or French literatures.10 In 1892, the year Gordon passed away in St. Petersburg, Hayyim Nahman Bialik, who would come to be known as the national Hebrew poet, published his first Hebrew poem in Odessa. The following decade was perhaps the most fertile period for Hebrew literary production in Europe.11 However, Bialik too expressed doubts regarding the survival of modern Hebrew literature among an emancipated European Jewry despite his ambition to lead a great Hebrew cultural revival.12 In the midst of its national turn and with its aspiration of gaining a meaningful position in the public sphere of European Jewry, modern Hebrew literature had to face perhaps the most complicated fact of its exis- tence: its non-reading readers. European Hebrew readers of the 19th century faced two major difficulties. The first was the difficulty of becoming a modern Hebrew reader. Or in other words, the difficulty of gaining access to Hebrew as the language of understanding and as the language of self-understanding, the language of personal and communal identification. The second difficulty was to understand Hebrew descriptions of the sur- rounding actual world, or to mimetically represent reality in the Hebrew lan- guage.
Recommended publications
  • The Cloven Soul
    THE CLOVEN SOUL: THE ART OF THE NARRATIVE OF M.Y. BERDICHEWSKI BY ZILLA JANE GOODMAN DISSERTATION FOR MASTER OF ARTS DEGREE DEPARTMENT OF HEBREW STUDIES University of Cape Town UNT"r.:RSITY OF CAPE TOWN OCTOBER 1986 The copyright of this thesis vests in the author. No quotation from it or information derived from it is to be published without full acknowledgement of the source. The thesis is to be used for private study or non- commercial research purposes only. Published by the University of Cape Town (UCT) in terms of the non-exclusive license granted to UCT by the author. University of Cape Town ABSTRACT Micha Yosef Berdichewski (1865 - 1921) is considered by many to be the most influential Jewish author of his generation. His literary activity encompassed both fiction and non-fiction. Berdichewski's fictional world has been termed "a spiritual organic unity" (Almagor 1968) inasmuch as his hero tends to reappear in many like-guises across the various stories and there is a great deal of repetition of themes, characters, motifs and even semantic elements throughout his work. The present work aims to show that the seeming uniformity in Berdichewski's writing is misleading. It postulates that the identity of feature that marks the Berdichewskian text is not productive of sameness, but rather that it promotes greater textual density through the adherence of variability within correlates. It purports that though Berdichewski's apparent stereotyping is due, at least in part, to an abiding concern with some central issues - and thus that his various narratives may be seen as the continuing working out of these concerns - these are never fully resolved but only interacted with from varying, quite disparate, perspectives.
    [Show full text]
  • Association for Jewish Studies 43Rd Annual Conference December 18–20, 2011
    43 ASSOCIATION FOR JEWISH STUDIES JEWISH FOR ASSOCIATION New York, NY 10011-6301 NY York, New 16th Street 15 West History Jewish for c/o Center Studies Jewish for Association 43ND ANNUAL CONFERENCE OF THE ASSOCIATION FOR JEWISH STUDIES DECEMBER 18–20, 2011 GRAND HYATT WASHINGTON WASHINGTON, DC 43 RD ANNUAL CONFERENCE RD ANNUAL DECEMBER 18–20, 2011 Association for Jewish Studies Association for Jewish Studies c/o Center for Jewish History 43rd Annual Conference 15 West 16th Street New York, NY 10011-6301 Program Book Contents Phone: (917) 606-8249 Fax: (917) 606-8222 E-mail: [email protected] Association for Jewish Studies Goals and Standards.................................................... 4 www.ajsnet.org Institutional Members.................................................................................................... 5 President AJS Staff Marsha Rozenblit, University of Maryland Rona Sheramy, Executive Director Message from the Conference Chair............................................................................. 6 Vice President/Membership Karen Terry, Program and Membership and Outreach Coordinator Conference Information................................................................................................ 8 Anita Norich, University of Michigan Natasha Perlis, Project Manager Vice President/Program Emma Barker, Conference and Program Program Committee and Division Coordinators........................................................... 9 Derek Penslar, University of Toronto Associate 2011 Award Recipients.................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Stephen Fruitman
    Creating Heart Stephen fruitman Creating a New Heart Marcus Ehrenpreis on Jewry and Judaism Akademisk avhandling med tillstånd av rektorsämbetet vid Umeå universitet för avläggande av filosofie doktorsexamen offentligen försvaras i Humanisthuset, hörsal E fredagen den 12 oktober 2001, klockan 09.15 av Stephen Fruitman <*3 V Stephen Fruitman: Creating a New Heart: Marcus Ehrenpreis on Jewry and Judaism English text Department of Historical Studies, University of Umeå, S-901 87 Umeå, Sweden Monograph 2001. 252 pages Idéhistoriska skrifter nr 35 ISBN: 91-7305-111-X ISSN: 0282-7646 Abstract This dissertation represents the first attempt to take account of the entire Swedish œuvre of Marcus Ehrenpreis and view it as a single, coherent statement, recognizing the very fundamental confrontation taking place between tradi­ tional and modern ways of viewing reality and its possible resolution. A reading of his work reveals that the one constant in his life in letters was the struggle to reconcile the apparent logical antithesis of universalism and particu­ larism, which this dissertation sees as one with resonance for all ethnic minorities. In the Chapter One, a general orientation in the modern Jewish world is provided, including the traditional worlds of Orthodoxy and Hasidism into which he was born; the trend toward the political emancipation of the Jews in Western and Central Europe and the subsequent waves of assimilation among young Jews; the exacerbation of antisemitic tendencies in both Eastern and Western Europe; the emergence of Jewish
    [Show full text]
  • THE IDEA of MODERN JEWISH CULTURE the Reference Library of Jewish Intellectual History the Idea of Modern Jewish Culture
    THE IDEA OF MODERN JEWISH CULTURE The Reference Library of Jewish Intellectual History The Idea of Modern Jewish Culture ELIEZER SCHWEID Translated by Amnon HADARY edited by Leonard LEVIN BOSTON 2008 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Schweid, Eliezer. [Likrat tarbut Yehudit modernit. English] The idea of modern Jewish culture / Eliezer Schweid ; [translated by Amnon Hadary ; edited by Leonard Levin]. p. cm.—(Reference library of Jewish intellectual history) Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 978-1-934843-05-5 1. Judaism—History—Modern period, 1750–. 2. Jews—Intellectual life. 3. Jews—Identity. 4. Judaism—20th century. 5. Zionism—Philosophy. I. Hadary, Amnon. II. Levin, Leonard, 1946– III. Title. BM195.S3913 2008 296.09’03—dc22 2008015812 Copyright © 2008 Academic Studies Press All rights reserved ISBN 978-1-934843-05-5 On the cover: David Tartakover, Proclamation of Independence, 1988 (Detail) Book design by Yuri Alexandrov Published by Academic Studies Press in 2008 145 Lake Shore Road Brighton, MA 02135, USA [email protected] www.academicstudiespress.com Contents Editor’s Preface . vii Foreword . xi Chapter One. Culture as a Concept and Culture as an Ideal . 1 Chapter Two. Tensions and Contradiction . 11 Chapter Three. Internalizing the Cultural Ideal . 15 Chapter Four. The Underlying Philosophy of Jewish Enlightenment . 18 Chapter Five. The Meaning of Being a Jewish-Hebrew Maskil . 24 Chapter Six. Crossroads: The Transition from Haskalah to the Science of Judaism . 35 Chapter Seven. The Dialectic between National Hebrew Culture and Jewish Idealistic Humanism . 37 Chapter Eight. The Philosophic Historic Formation of Jewish Humanism: a Modern Guide to the Perplexed .
    [Show full text]
  • Tamar Amar-Dahl Zionist Israel and the Question of Palestine
    Tamar Amar-Dahl Zionist Israel and the Question of Palestine Tamar Amar-Dahl Zionist Israel and the Question of Palestine Jewish Statehood and the History of the Middle East Conflict First edition published by Ferdinand Schöningh GmbH & Co. KG in 2012: Das zionistische Israel. Jüdischer Nationalismus und die Geschichte des Nahostkonflikts An electronic version of this book is freely available, thanks to the support of libra- ries working with Knowledge Unlatched. KU is a collaborative initiative designed to make high quality books Open Access. More information about the initiative can be found at www.knowledgeunlatched.org This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 License. For details go to http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/. ISBN 978-3-11-049663-5 e-ISBN (PDF) 978-3-11-049880-6 e-ISBN (EPUB) 978-3-11-049564-5 ISBN 978-3-11-021808-4 e-ISBN (PDF) 978-3-11-021809-1 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data e-ISBN (EPUB) 978-3-11-021806-2 A CIP catalog record for this book has been applied for at the Library of Congress. ISSN 0179-0986 e-ISSN 0179-3256 Bibliografische Information der Deutschen Nationalbibliothek The Deutsche Nationalbibliothek lists this publication in the Deutsche Nationalbibliographie; detailed bibliographic data are available in the Internet at http://dnb.dnb.de. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 License, © 2017 Tamar Amar-Dahl, published by Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston as of February 23, 2017. For details go to http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/.
    [Show full text]
  • Thomas Mann Und Die Jüdische Tradition
    Thomas Mann und die jüdische Tradition Untersuchungen zu Joseph und seine Brüder unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der Schriftauslegung des Midrasch Von der Philosophischen Fakultät der Rheinisch-Westfälischen Technischen Hochschule Aachen zur Erlangung des akademischen Grades einer Doktorin der Philosophie genehmigte Dissertation vorgelegt von Heike Breitenbach, M.A. aus Siegen Berichter: Universitätsprofessor Dr. Hans Otto Horch Universitätsprofessorin Dr. Susanne Gillmayr-Bucher Tag der mündlichen Prüfung: 26.06.2009 Diese Dissertation ist auf den Internetseiten der Hochschulbibliothek online verfügbar. Dank Mein Dank gilt zuerst Prof. Paul Mendes-Flohr, der mich zur Anfertigung dieser Arbeit im Rahmen meines Studienaufenthaltes am Franz Rosenzweig Forschungszentrum für deutsch-jüdische Literatur und Kulturgeschichte an der Hebräischen Universität Jerusalem ermutigt und mich in den Jahren meiner wissenschaftlichen Arbeit stetig begleitet und unterstützt hat. Mein Dank gilt in gleicher Weise Prof. Hans Otto Horch, der das Entstehen der vorliegenden Arbeit wissenschaftlich betreut und mich auch in schwierigen Phasen unermüdlich unterstützt hat. Dafür bin ich ihm im Besonderen dankbar. Ohne die finanzielle Unterstützung durch ein Stipendium der Minerva Stiftung hätte ich diese Arbeit nicht in der gleichen Weise durchführen können. Es ermöglichte mir einen längeren Aufenthalt am Franz Rosenzweig Zentrum in Jerusalem. Die fächerübergreifenden Diskussionen dort haben mich in gleicher Weise gefördert wie gefordert. Ich danke allen, die mir
    [Show full text]
  • Arthur Green Library of Contemporary Jewish Philosophers
    Arthur Green Library of Contemporary Jewish Philosophers Editor-in-Chief Hava Tirosh-Samuelson, Arizona State University Editor Aaron W. Hughes, University of Rochester VOLume 16 Leiden • boston The titles published in this series are listed at brill.com/lcjp 2015 Arthur Green Hasidism for Tomorrow Edited by Hava Tirosh-Samuelson and Aaron W. Hughes Leiden • boston 2015 Cover illustration: Courtesy of Hebrew College The series The Library of Contemporary Jewish Philosophers was generously supported by the Baron Foundation. Green, Arthur, 1941– author. Arthur Green : Hasidism for tomorrow / edited by Hava Tirosh-Samuelson and Aaron W. Hughes. pages cm. — (Library of contemporary Jewish philosophers, ISSN 2213-6010 ; volume 16) Includes bibliographical references. ISBN 978-90-04-30840-4 (hardback : alk. paper) — ISBN 978-90-04-30842-8 (e-book) 1. Green, Arthur, 1941– 2. Jewish philosophy. 3. Judaism and philosophy. I. Tirosh-Samuelson, Hava, 1950– editor. II. Title. BM565.G676 2015 296.8’332—dc23 2015034873 This publication has been typeset in the multilingual “Brill” typeface. With over 5,100 characters covering Latin, IPA, Greek, and Cyrillic, this typeface is especially suitable for use in the humanities. For more information, please see www.brill.com/brill-typeface. ISSN 2213-6010 ISBN 978-90-04-30840-4 (hardback) ISBN 978-90-04-30842-8 (e-book) This hardback is also published in paperback under ISBN 978-90-04-30841-1. Copyright 2015 by Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden, The Netherlands. Koninklijke Brill NV incorporates the imprints Brill, Brill Hes & De Graaf, Brill Nijhoff, Brill Rodopi and Hotei Publishing. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, translated, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without prior written permission from the publisher.
    [Show full text]
  • Ober Berlin Nach Jerusalem: Deutsch Land Und Die Hebraische Literatur
    ZEITSCHRIFT Ober Berlin DER HOCHSCHULE FUR J UDISCHE nach Jerusalem: STU DIEN HEIDELBERG Deutsch land BAND 21 und die hebraische Literatur Uni versi ta tsver lag WINTER i:i n ' Jii1 IHocHscHuLE FO R 01.)1' JODISCHE STUDIEN Heidelberg ii?'?1 HEIDELBERG In den Beziehungen der Israelis zu Deutschland vollzieht sich in den letzten Jahren ein signifikanter Umbruch: Auf der einen Seite wird die Zahl der Zeitzeugen und Oberlebenden der Shoah immer geringer, auf der anderen Seite ist das Interesse j unger Israelis an Deutschland als Ziel for Reisen und gar als dauerhafter Aufent­ halt so grofS wie nie zuvor. In der zeitgenossischen israelischen Belletristik ist Deutschland ein beherrschendes Thema. Vor diesern Hintergrund fand im Juli 2012 in Heidelberg eine internationale Tagung statt, auf der die wechselvolle und oft kontroverse Rolle Deutschlands in der Diaspora sowie irn heutigen Staat Israel durch die Linse der Literatur betrach­ tet wurde. Der Titel der Tagung lautete - in Anlehnung an Gershom Scholems Autobiographie Von Berlin nach Jerusalem - »Uber Berlin nach Jerusalem«, wobei die Praposition »iiber« doppeldeutig als Thema aber auch als Station zu verstehen war. Der vorliegende Band versammelt die Beitrage, die Autoren des friihen 20. Jahr­ hunderts, darunter Micha Yosef Berdyczewski, Shaul Tschernichowsky, Shmuel Yosef Agnon, Chaim Nachman Bialik sowie Natan Zach, Lea Goldberg und Dahn Ben Amotz behandeln. Ein Blick auf ein aktuelles deutsch-israelisches Thea­ terprojekt, die Rezeptionsgeschichte deutscher Literatur in Israel sowie die Geschichte der literarischen Beilage der Tageszeitung Haaretz runden das Bild ab. Beitrage zum Schwerpunkt von: Nitza Ben Dov, Nili Gold, Avner Holtzman, Tamara Or, Na'ama Sheffi, Yfaat Weiss, Benny Ziffer, Anat Feinberg, Karen Frankenstein, Mirjam Korner und Yana Lemberska.
    [Show full text]
  • When Did Haskalah Begin? Establishing the Beginning of Haskalah Literature and the Definition of "Modernism" Downloaded From
    When Did Haskalah Begin? Establishing the Beginning of Haskalah Literature and the Definition of "Modernism" Downloaded from BY MOSHE PELLI http://leobaeck.oxfordjournals.org/ When did modern Hebrew literature begin? Does its beginning coincide with the beginning of Haskalah literature? Is there a literary personality who signals the beginning of the new trends in modern Hebrew literature? These were some of the questions discussed by several literary historians in the early days of Haskalah historiography. For some time, such questions were frequently debated, but after a while, literary historians and critics apparently lost interest in them. The topic has recently been revisited by a few contemporary Haskalah scholars. The questions now being asked echo earlier themes, though more at Ohio State University Libraries on September 5, 2016 profound queries have emerged: What is "modern" in "modern Hebrew litera- ture", and how is "Hebrew modernism" defined? The most significant trend in Haskalah historiography has highlighted the elements, which distinguish Haskalah literature from the corpus of traditional Hebrew literature through the ages. Haskalah was considered to be new, modern and different. Proponents of this notion designated Haskalah as the beginning of modern Hebrew literature, while endeavouring to identify a major writer or group of writers who, to them, signal the beginning of Haskalah. There was, however, another trend, the major spokesman of which was Dov Sadan (and perhaps also, to some extent, Shmuel Werses, as discussed below). Sadan did not emphasise the distinctions between bodies of literature. Instead, he estab- lished different outlooks, which group together various types of literature and form a different concept of periodisation.
    [Show full text]
  • Micha Brumlik• from Obscurantism to Holiness
    Micha Brumlik From Obscurantism to Holiness “Eastern Jewish” Thought in Buber, Heschel, and Levinas In public perception, East European Jewish thought is surrounded by a mystical veil. The three thinkers Martin Buber, Joshua Heschel, and Emmanuel Levinas shared the East European Jewish experience, an education in existential philosophy in Germany, and the ordeal of wit- nessing the mass murder of Europe’s Jews. They are united by a univer- salistic ethic aimed at promoting direct human responsibility. More clearly than Buber and Heschel, we have Levinas to thank for an appreciation of what one could call “East European Jewry”. In public perception, East European Jewish thought continues to be surrounded by an almost mystical veil. Particularly after the systematic murder of at least 3 million Polish Jews by National-Socialist Germany, the perception of this culture is accom- panied by a justifiable sense of irreparable loss. An outward sign of this melancholy, which is never precisely specified and often borders on kitsch, is the playing of klezmer music at any suitable – or indeed unsuitable – occasion. “Eastern Jewry” is itself a culture that is still seen as a mixture of nostalgic percep- tions regarding impoverished shtetl life and the sometimes nebulous sayings of mira- cle-working rabbis. The fact that this narrow point of view fails to do justice to the reality of this destroyed culture, that at least just as many Polish or indeed Russian and Romanian Jews lived in large cities, that – in addition to the largely Hassidic miracle-working
    [Show full text]
  • Minorities in Modern Hebrew Literature: a Survey1
    Minorities in Modern Hebrew Literature: A Survey Minorities in Modern Hebrew Literature: A Survey1 近現代ヘブライ文学におけるマイノリティ:概観 Doron B. Cohen, Ph.D. ドロン・B・コヘン,Ph.D. Summary:1 Along their history, Jews often found themselves in a minority situation, and their awareness of this fact was expressed in their writings, but in modern times Jews also experienced being a majority. However, even while being an ethnic minority, they had various groups of social minorities in their midst. The present article offers a survey of the attitude towards various kinds of minorities as expressed in Modern Hebrew literature, along a division to three periods: (1) in Eastern Europe, from mid-19th to early 20th century (minorities such as orphans, the handicapped, and women as marginal- ized in society); (2) in Central Europe and Palestine, during the first half of the 20th century (similar minorities); (3) in the State of Israel (similar minorities, as well as Arabs, Jews of Asian and African origin and migrant workers). Our survey shows that authors of Modern Hebrew literature displayed an acute awareness of the plight of different minorities. Key words: Hebrew Literature, Minorities, Jews & Arabs, Ashkenazim, Mizrahim 要旨: 歴史を通じて、ユダヤ人はしばしばマイノリティの状況にあり、その意識は彼らの書くもの に表現されてきた。しかし、近現代においては、ユダヤ人はマジョリティとしての立場も体 験することになった。民族としてはマイノリティであっても、彼らの内部には様々な社会的 マイノリティ集団を抱えていた。本稿は、近現代ヘブライ文学に表れた様々なマイノリティ への態度を概観するものである。近現代を以下の三つの時期に区分する:(1)19 世紀半ば −20 世紀初頭の東欧(社会の周縁にあるマイノリティとしては、孤児、障がい者、女性な ど )、( 2)20 世紀前半の中央ヨーロッパとパレスティナ地域(同上のマイノリティ)、(3) イスラエル国家において(同上のマイノリティに加えて、アラブ人、アジア系及びアフリカ 系ユダヤ人、移民労働者)。本稿の概観を通して、近現代ヘブライ文学の著者は、様々なマ イノリティの窮状を鋭く認識し、それを表現していたことが窺える。 キーワード: ヘブライ文学、マイノリティ、ユダヤ人とアラブ人、アシュケナジーム、ミズラヒーム 1 I am grateful to Prof. Nitza Ben-Dov of Haifa University for her generous assistance in the writing of this article, but I must obviously assume sole responsibility for any error or misjudgment in it.
    [Show full text]
  • Jewish Folk Literature
    University of Pennsylvania ScholarlyCommons Department of Near Eastern Languages and Departmental Papers (NELC) Civilizations (NELC) 1999 Jewish Folk Literature Dan Ben-Amos University of Pennsylvania, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.upenn.edu/nelc_papers Part of the Cultural History Commons, Folklore Commons, Jewish Studies Commons, and the Near and Middle Eastern Studies Commons Recommended Citation Ben-Amos, D. (1999). Jewish Folk Literature. Oral Tradition, 14 (1), 140-274. Retrieved from https://repository.upenn.edu/nelc_papers/93 This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/nelc_papers/93 For more information, please contact [email protected]. Jewish Folk Literature Abstract Four interrelated qualities distinguish Jewish folk literature: (a) historical depth, (b) continuous interdependence between orality and literacy, (c) national dispersion, and (d) linguistic diversity. In spite of these diverging factors, the folklore of most Jewish communities clearly shares a number of features. The Jews, as a people, maintain a collective memory that extends well into the second millennium BCE. Although literacy undoubtedly figured in the preservation of the Jewish cultural heritage to a great extent, at each period it was complemented by orality. The reciprocal relations between the two thus enlarged the thematic, formal, and social bases of Jewish folklore. The dispersion of the Jews among the nations through forced exiles and natural migrations further expanded
    [Show full text]