DOCSLIB.ORG

Flood Control Advisory Committee Zone 2A January 25, 2018 Minutes

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Flood Control Advisory Committee Zone 2A January 25, 2018 Minutes ZONE 2A ADVISORY COMMITTEE MINUTES January 25, 2018 ATTENDEES: John FitzGerald (JF)- Member Jason Beatty (JB)- City of Chase Takajo (CT)- SCWA Petaluma Ted Cabral (TC)- Member Jon Niehaus (JN)- SCWA Curt Bates (CB)- City of Bob Martin (BM)- Member Kara Kelly (KK)- SCWA Petaluma Andy Rodgers (AR)- Member Rick Savel (RS)- Public Susan Haydon (SH)- SCWA Teresa Barrett (TB)- Member Paul Efron (PE)- Public Kent Gylfe (KG)- SCWA Chris Cheek (CC)- Public 1. OPENING/INTRODUCTIONS: Meeting called to order by John FitzGerald, Vice Chairman, at 2:05pm. Susan Haydon (SH) acknowledged the public noticing of the meeting in two newspapers, Press Democrat and Argus Courier, SCWA website, and offices of SCWA, City of Petaluma, and Sonoma County Clerk. Chairman, Ted Cabral, joined meeting a few minutes late and resumed leading the meeting. 2. PUBLIC COMMENT: Rick Savel, Penngrove resident, noted the updated community separator designation and policy issues for area south of Valley House Drive. 90 acres of the 170 acre area have been approved to date for incorporation into the community separator. Future consideration of additional acres to be designated as community separator is dependent on subsequent land use policy changes and is related to future voter consideration of renewal of the City of Rohnert Park’s urban growth boundary. 3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: Minutes from the December 8, 2016 meeting were approved as submitted with motion by AR, second by BM. The minutes for the meeting of July 20, 2017 were approved as submitted by motion by JF and second by TB. 4. FLOOD MANAGEMENT DESIGN MANUAL (FMDM): SH provided an overview of the FMDM being revised by the Agency and its consultants, ESA and Horizon. The Manual was formerly titled “Flood Control Design Criteria’ and was last updated in 1983. This manual serves as the adopted criteria used to design flood protection facilities and infrastructure. Water Agency engineer, Phil Wadsworth, is lead staff on updating the manual. The Manual takes a different approach to design criteria and in the new document, the criteria will now be more performance based and provide a series of recommended actions or Best Management Practices rather than being prescriptive. The updated manual will incorporate updated NOAA precipitation data. The draft FMDM will be available for public review and comment with target date in March 2018. A series of workshops are planned for late spring to outreach to the public, the Cities, and engineering community for review and input. The anticipated timeframe for Water Agency Board of Directors/Supervisors review and approval is late July/early August. SH will notify committee members when the FMDM is available for review. Committee discussion was held with questions regarding whether tidal changes in sea level rise and additional silt in the river are addressed in the manual. 5. WATER AGENCY’S LOCAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN (LHMP): Kent Gylfe, water agency engineer, provided an overview of the LHMP planning process, purpose and content. An initial LHMP was prepared by SCWA in 2008 to evaluate hazard risks and their potential impacts to the Agency’s water transmission, sanitation and flood control infrastructure throughout the county. Agencies are required to develop and maintain such plans in order to qualify for and obtain Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) funding. SCWA will prepare the public draft LHMP for review and comment with target for release by early March. The City of Petaluma is concurrently working on updating an LHMP that covers City infrastructure. The committee will be notified when the Draft LHMP is available for public review. (handout attached) 6. CURRENT PROJECTS AND REPORTS: a. STREAM MAINTENANCE PROGRAM: Chase Takajo gave an overview of the Water Agency’s Stream Maintenance Program (SMP) 2017 season. Vegetation management work was completed on Adobe, East Fork McDowell, Corona, East Washington, Lichau, Lynch, and Washington Creeks and the Petaluma River. Over 1,600 lbs. of garbage and debris was removed. Sediment management work took place on Corona, East Fork McDowell and Lichau Creeks. Foothill yellow legged frog was recently listed by the state as a candidate species and is granted all protections of an endangered species. As such, SMP crews could not complete work planned on the Adobe Creek sediment basin. SMP staff are currently in the process of amending permits to include considerations for these frogs. The Water Agency is partnering with Casa Grande High School’s United Anglers program to assist with outreach and field visits for proposed vegetation management work in stream channel areas (as part of the Agency’s natural channels work). The focus areas are along stream reaches in rural areas not currently addressed through existing permits. JF thanked Water Agency for the good work. b. UPPER COPELAND CREEK TOUR: The Multi-Agency Assessment Team hosted a tour of the upper Copeland Creek watershed in December, 2017 to provide neighbors, Zone members, and other stakeholders an opportunity for discussion of flood related issues. Tour was well attended and stops included the Fairfield Osborne Preserve, Upper Copeland Creek avulsion site on Lichau Rd./Cold Springs, and site east of Petaluma Hill Rd. (owned by City of Rohnert Park) being studied for a potential stormwater basin project. A variety of next step actions were discussed and recommended including: formation of an emergency notification system, additional studies needed to understand dynamics of flooding and sedimentation, installation of stream gages and improved storm forecasting. Several advisory committee members from both Flood Zones 1A & 2A and meeting participants attended the tour. Compliments were given to the Water Agency on content and format of the tour. c. UPPER PETALUMA FLOOD CONTROL PROJECT: First and second tier of survey work has been performed and data has been delivered to consultant. SCWA is expecting results soon and will be convening a meeting to review preliminary model results and screening. SCWA will present results to the committee at a future meeting. d. LICHAU CREEK MODELING AND FEASIBILITY STUDY: Survey work is being conducted on 2.5 miles of Lichau Creek to develop accurate topography to integrate with LiDAR. Based on this foundational information, consultant will develop an approach to future modeling and 3 alternatives for flood reduction in this sub-watershed. This study and the Upper Petaluma project are aligned in surveying methods and will integrate modeling. e. STORM WATER RESOURCE PLAN: In 2016 SCWA entered into a contact with the State Water Resources Control Board to receive $485,000 in grant funds for the development of a regional SWRP for Sonoma Creek and Petaluma River watersheds. SCWA has since formed a Technical Advisory Committee, including the City of Petaluma, held four TAC meetings and a public meeting, and has received 60 multi benefit stormwater projects from the TAC and other stakeholders. A public draft of the SWRP will be available for public comment in July, 2018. f. CITY PROJECTS AND REPORTS: Jason Beatty provided an overview and status update of City projects including: 1) Denman Reach Flood Terracing Phases 3 and 4, 2) Capri Creek Flood Capacity and Habitat Enhancement, 3) Petaluma River dredging, 4) ALERT 2 stream gauge upgrades, and 5) Feasibility studies on Washington, Kelly and Corona Creeks. TC noted potential funding opportunities for commercial dredging through CA Dept. of Boating and Waterways for recreational boating facilities. TC requests that the Zone committee address the need for and funding for dredging. The topic of dredging should be added to future agenda item. (handout attached) 7. FY 2018/19 BUDGET: SH presented an overview of the proposed FY 18/19 budget. Budget priorities include: a) emphasis on stream maintenance activities, including future expanded maintenance activities associated with new programmatic permits for Natural and Modified channels (limited activities in rural areas), b) pursuit of multi-benefit projects and associated outside funding (grants) that can leverage local flood zone tax for greater public benefit, and c) preservation of a prudent reserve for emergency response to major storm/flood events. TC noted he would like to see a breakdown and explanation for the expenditures in the building and equipment budget category in future. Water Agency is recommending $250,000 for assessment work attributed to Upper Copeland & Lichau Creeks with same budget level being recommended and contributed through Zone 1A funds. Water Agency is also recommending $50,000 to cover additional staff time towards the management and completion the state grant funded project (DWR, Proposition 1E) in partnership with the City. These project elements include: a) Phase 4 flood capacity improvement work on Denman Reach and sediment removal under Corona Road bridge. Committee discussion held. The FY18-19 recommended budget was approved as presented with motion by Teresa Barrett and second by John FitzGerald. Motion carried. 8. PUBLIC COMMENT: Paul Efron, Penngrove resident, presented an overview of the seasonal flooding issues affecting his property off of Railroad Ave. PE is interested in learning more about flooding issues, how to address them and seeking guidance on how best to contact the County regarding the culvert on his property. PE expressed his appreciation for the public process and committee meeting, stating his interest in staying involved in flood related issues. PE also noted that he was pleased to see the budget item proposed for the Multi-Assessement team to study issues regarding flooding and sedimentation in the Upper Copeland/Lichau Creek area. KG noted that Mr. Efron’s property is located within the study area of the Lichau Creek modeling and feasibility study. TC notes that he is no longer serving as Chairman for California State Park’s Off Highway Vehicle Committee. He will now be able to participate more fully in the Zone 2A committee and remains very interested and committed to addressing the issues ahead.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Southern Sonoma County Stormwater Resources Plan Evaluation Process
    Appendix A List of Stakeholders Engaged APPENDIX A List of Stakeholders Engaged Specific audiences engaged in the planning process are identified below. These audiences include: cities, government officials, landowners, public land managers, locally regulated commercial, agricultural and industrial stakeholders, non-governmental organizations, mosquito and vector control districts and the general public. TABLE 1 LIST OF STAKEHOLDERS ENGAGED Organization Type Watershed 1st District Supervisor Government Sonoma 5th District Supervisor Government Petaluma City of Petaluma Government Petaluma City of Sonoma Government Sonoma Daily Acts Non-Governmental Petaluma Friends of the Petaluma River Non-Governmental Petaluma Zone 2A Petaluma River Watershed- Flood Control Government Petaluma Advisory Committee Zone 3A Valley of the Moon - Flood Control Advisory Government Sonoma Committee Marin Sonoma Mosquito & Vector Control District Special District Both Sonoma Ecology Center Non-Governmental Sonoma Sonoma County Regional Parks Government Both Sonoma County Agricultural Preservation and Open Government Both Space District Sonoma Land Trust Non-Governmental Both Sonoma County Transportation and Public Works Government Both Valley of the Moon Water District Government Sonoma Sonoma Resource Conservation District Special District Both Sonoma County Permit Sonoma Government Both Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Non-Governmental N/A California State Parks Government Both California State Water Resources Control Board Government N/A Southern Sonoma
    [Show full text]
  • AQ Conformity Amended PBA 2040 Supplemental Report Mar.2018
    TRANSPORTATION-AIR QUALITY CONFORMITY ANALYSIS FINAL SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT Metropolitan Transportation Commission Association of Bay Area Governments MARCH 2018 Metropolitan Transportation Commission Jake Mackenzie, Chair Dorene M. Giacopini Julie Pierce Sonoma County and Cities U.S. Department of Transportation Association of Bay Area Governments Scott Haggerty, Vice Chair Federal D. Glover Alameda County Contra Costa County Bijan Sartipi California State Alicia C. Aguirre Anne W. Halsted Transportation Agency Cities of San Mateo County San Francisco Bay Conservation and Development Commission Libby Schaaf Tom Azumbrado Oakland Mayor’s Appointee U.S. Department of Housing Nick Josefowitz and Urban Development San Francisco Mayor’s Appointee Warren Slocum San Mateo County Jeannie Bruins Jane Kim Cities of Santa Clara County City and County of San Francisco James P. Spering Solano County and Cities Damon Connolly Sam Liccardo Marin County and Cities San Jose Mayor’s Appointee Amy R. Worth Cities of Contra Costa County Dave Cortese Alfredo Pedroza Santa Clara County Napa County and Cities Carol Dutra-Vernaci Cities of Alameda County Association of Bay Area Governments Supervisor David Rabbit Supervisor David Cortese Councilmember Pradeep Gupta ABAG President Santa Clara City of South San Francisco / County of Sonoma San Mateo Supervisor Erin Hannigan Mayor Greg Scharff Solano Mayor Liz Gibbons ABAG Vice President City of Campbell / Santa Clara City of Palo Alto Representatives From Mayor Len Augustine Cities in Each County City of Vacaville
    [Show full text]
  • (Oncorhynchus Mykiss) in Streams of the San Francisco Estuary, California
    Historical Distribution and Current Status of Steelhead/Rainbow Trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) in Streams of the San Francisco Estuary, California Robert A. Leidy, Environmental Protection Agency, San Francisco, CA Gordon S. Becker, Center for Ecosystem Management and Restoration, Oakland, CA Brett N. Harvey, John Muir Institute of the Environment, University of California, Davis, CA This report should be cited as: Leidy, R.A., G.S. Becker, B.N. Harvey. 2005. Historical distribution and current status of steelhead/rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) in streams of the San Francisco Estuary, California. Center for Ecosystem Management and Restoration, Oakland, CA. Center for Ecosystem Management and Restoration TABLE OF CONTENTS Forward p. 3 Introduction p. 5 Methods p. 7 Determining Historical Distribution and Current Status; Information Presented in the Report; Table Headings and Terms Defined; Mapping Methods Contra Costa County p. 13 Marsh Creek Watershed; Mt. Diablo Creek Watershed; Walnut Creek Watershed; Rodeo Creek Watershed; Refugio Creek Watershed; Pinole Creek Watershed; Garrity Creek Watershed; San Pablo Creek Watershed; Wildcat Creek Watershed; Cerrito Creek Watershed Contra Costa County Maps: Historical Status, Current Status p. 39 Alameda County p. 45 Codornices Creek Watershed; Strawberry Creek Watershed; Temescal Creek Watershed; Glen Echo Creek Watershed; Sausal Creek Watershed; Peralta Creek Watershed; Lion Creek Watershed; Arroyo Viejo Watershed; San Leandro Creek Watershed; San Lorenzo Creek Watershed; Alameda Creek Watershed; Laguna Creek (Arroyo de la Laguna) Watershed Alameda County Maps: Historical Status, Current Status p. 91 Santa Clara County p. 97 Coyote Creek Watershed; Guadalupe River Watershed; San Tomas Aquino Creek/Saratoga Creek Watershed; Calabazas Creek Watershed; Stevens Creek Watershed; Permanente Creek Watershed; Adobe Creek Watershed; Matadero Creek/Barron Creek Watershed Santa Clara County Maps: Historical Status, Current Status p.
    [Show full text]
  • Statewide Drought Response
    Statewide Drought Response: Stressor Monitoring SUMMARY REPORT • 2014-2017 COVER IMAGES, CLOCKWISE FROM TOP: South Lake Reservoir with low water levels due to drought in California. CDFW staff conducting a salmon carcass survey in the Merced River in 2012. CDFW staff conducting a snorkel survey in Gobernador Creek in 2015. Please direct questions about this report to Ms. Kristine Atkinson, Senior Environmental Scientist (Specialist), at [email protected], CDFW Fisheries Branch, 830 S Street, Sacramento, CA 95811 Contributors FISHERIES BRANCH BAY DELTA REGION Kristine Atkinson NORTH OF SAN FRANCISCO John Kelly Ryan Watanabe Stephen Swales Derek Acomb Melissa Mandrup George Neillands Patrick Mulcahy Lydia Eldridge SOUTH OF SAN FRANCISCO Helen Benson Jennifer Nelson Stephanie Mehalick Michelle Leicester Jon Jankovitz BIOGEOGRAPHIC DATA BRANCH George Neillands Janet Brewster Ryan Hill CENTRAL REGION Kristina White COASTAL Dennis Michniuk OFFICE OF COMMUNICATION, Matthew Michie EDUCATION AND OUTREACH Margaret Paul Meredith Fleener WILD TROUT / INLAND Ken Johnson NORTHERN REGION Eric Guzman COASTAL SAN JOAQUIN BASIN Seth Ricker Pat Ferguson CENTRAL VALLEY Steve Tsao Stacey Alexander Jason Roberts SOUTH COAST REGION WILD TROUT / INLAND COASTAL Andrew Jensen Ben Lakish Jennifer Bull Mary Larson Paul Divine Kyle Evans Steve Baumgartner Marianne Pelletier Mike Dege Bernard Aguilar INLAND Caitlin Bean Jennifer Pareti Tom Christy Tim Hovey Dylan Nickerson NORTH CENTRAL REGION Russell Barabe CENTRAL VALLEY Hans Hansen Tracy McReynolds
    [Show full text]
  • MAJOR STREAMS in SONOMA COUNTY March 1, 2000
    MAJOR STREAMS IN SONOMA COUNTY March 1, 2000 Bill Cox District Fishery Biologist Sonoma / Marin Gualala River 234 North Fork Gualala River 34 Big Pepperwood Creek 34 Rockpile Creek 34 Buckeye Creek 34 Francini Creek 23 Soda Springs Creek 34 Little Creek North Fork Buckeye Creek Osser Creek 3 Roy Creek 3 Flatridge Creek 3 South Fork Gualala River 32 Marshall Creek 234 Sproul Creek 34 Wild Cattle Canyon Creek 34 McKenzie Creek 34 Wheatfield Fork Gualala River 3 Fuller Creek 234 Boyd Creek 3 Sullivan Creek 3 North Fork Fuller Creek 23 South Fork Fuller Creek 23 Haupt Creek 234 Tobacco Creek 3 Elk Creek House Creek 34 Soda Spring Creek Allen Creek Pepperwood Creek 34 Danfield Creek 34 Cow Creek Jim Creek 34 Grasshopper Creek Britain Creek 3 Cedar Creek 3 Wolf Creek 3 Tombs Creek 3 Sugar Loaf Creek 3 Deadman Gulch Cannon Gulch Chinese Gulch Phillips Gulch Miller Creek 3 Warren Creek Wildcat Creek Stockhoff Creek 3 Timber Cove Creek Kohlmer Gulch 3 Fort Ross Creek 234 Russian Gulch 234 East Branch Russian Gulch 234 Middle Branch Russian Gulch 234 West Branch Russian Gulch 34 Russian River 31 Jenner Creek 3 Willow Creek 134 Sheephouse Creek 13 Orrs Creek Freezeout Creek 23 Austin Creek 235 Kohute Gulch 23 Kidd Creek 23 East Austin Creek 235 Black Rock Creek 3 Gilliam Creek 23 Schoolhouse Creek 3 Thompson Creek 3 Gray Creek 3 Lawhead Creek Devils Creek 3 Conshea Creek 3 Tiny Creek Sulphur Creek 3 Ward Creek 13 Big Oat Creek 3 Blue Jay 3 Pole Mountain Creek 3 Bear Pen Creek 3 Red Slide Creek 23 Dutch Bill Creek 234 Lancel Creek 3 N.F.
    [Show full text]
  • A STATISTICAL SUMMARY of DATA from the U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY's NATIONAL WATER QUALITY NETWORKS by Richard A
    A STATISTICAL SUMMARY OF DATA FROM THE U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY'S NATIONAL WATER QUALITY NETWORKS by Richard A. Smith and Richard B. Alexander U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 83-533 Reston, Virginia June 1983 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR JAMES G. WATT, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Dallas L. Peck, Director For additional information Copies of this report can write to: be purchased from: Chief Hydrologist Open-File Services Section U.S. Geological Survey Western Distribution Branch 12201 Sunrise Valley Drive Box 25425, Federal Center Reston, Virginia 22092 Denver, Colorado 80225 (Telephone: (303) 234-5888) CONTENTS Page Abstract 4 Introduction- 5 Statistical Methods 7 Data Screening 7 Estimates of Mean Concentration and Mean Transport of Common Constituents 8 Trend Test 8 Slope Estimator 9 Flow Adjustment Test 9 Summary Statistics for Trace Metals 11 References 30 TABLES Table 1. Detection Limits (in units of ug L-l) applicable during the period of summary for total recoverable and dissolved metal s--------- --------- -_----___- .................. ------ 13 Table 2. Station list by drainage basin 14 Table 3. Station list by state 21 Summary Tables by Station 28 A STATISTICAL SUMMARY OF DATA FROM THE U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY'S NATIONAL WATER QUALITY NETWORKS By Richard A. Smith and Richard B. Alexander ABSTRACT The U.S. Geological Survey operates two nationwide networks to monitor water quality, the National Hydrologic Bench-Mark Network and the National Stream Quality Accounting Network {NASQAN). The Bench-Mark network is composed of 51 stations in small drainage basins which are as close as possible to their natural state, with no human influence and little likelihood of future development.
    [Show full text]
  • Sonoma County
    Historical Distribution and Current Status of Steelhead/Rainbow Trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) in Streams of the San Francisco Estuary, California Robert A. Leidy, Environmental Protection Agency, San Francisco, CA Gordon S. Becker, Center for Ecosystem Management and Restoration, Oakland, CA Brett N. Harvey, John Muir Institute of the Environment, University of California, Davis, CA This report should be cited as: Leidy, R.A., G.S. Becker, B.N. Harvey. 2005. Historical distribution and current status of steelhead/rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) in streams of the San Francisco Estuary, California. Center for Ecosystem Management and Restoration, Oakland, CA. Center for Ecosystem Management and Restoration SONOMA COUNTY Petaluma River Watershed The Petaluma River watershed lies within portions of Marin and Sonoma Counties. The river flows in a northwesterly to southeasterly direction into San Pablo Bay. Petaluma River In a 1962 report, Skinner indicated that the Petaluma River was an historical migration route and habitat for steelhead (Skinner 1962). At that time, the creek was said to be “lightly used” as steelhead habitat (Skinner 1962). In July 1968, DFG surveyed portions of the Petaluma River accessible by automobile from the upstream limit of tidal influence to the headwaters. No O. mykiss were observed (Thomson and Michaels 1968d). Leidy electrofished upstream from the Corona Road crossing in July 1993. No salmonids were found (Leidy 2002). San Antonio Creek San Antonio Creek is a tributary of Petaluma River and drains an area of approximately 12 square miles. The channel is the border between Sonoma and Marin Counties. In a 1962 report, Skinner indicated that San Antonio Creek was an historical migration route for steelhead (Skinner 1962).
    [Show full text]
  • Foothill Yellow-Legged Frog Comments
    The Center for Biological Diversity submits the following information for the status review of the foothill yellow-legged frog (Rana boylii) (Docket #FWS-R8-ES-2015-0050), including substantial new information regarding the species' biology, population structure (including potential Distinct Population Segments of the species), historical and recent distribution and status, population trends, documented range contraction, habitat requirements, threats to the species and its habitat, disease, and the potential effects of climate change on the species and its habitat. The foothill yellow-legged frog has experienced extensive population declines throughout its range and a significant range contraction. Multiple threats continue unabated throughout much of the species’ remaining range, including impacts from dams, water development, water diversions, timber harvest, mining, marijuana cultivation, livestock grazing, roads and urbanization, recreation, climate change and UV-radiation, pollution, invasive species and disease. The species warrants listing as threatened under the Endangered Species Act. Contact: Jeff Miller, [email protected] Contents: NATURAL HISTORY, BIOLOGY AND STATUS . .. 2 Biology. .2 Habitat . .. .4 Range and Documented Range Contraction . 4 Taxonomy . 9 Population Structure . 9 Historical and Recent Distribution and Status . 15 Central Oregon . .15 Southern Oregon . 18 Coastal Oregon . .20 Northern Coastal California . 25 Upper Sacramento River . 40 Marin/Sonoma . 45 Northern/Central Sierra Nevada . .47 Southern Sierra Nevada . .67 Central Coast/Bay Area . 77 South Coast. 91 Southern California . .. 94 Baja California, Mexico . .98 Unknown Population Affiliation. .99 Population Trends . .. .103 THREATS. .108 Habitat Alteration and Destruction . .. 108 Dams, Water Development and Diversions . .. .109 Logging . .. .111 Marijuana Cultivation . .. .112 Livestock Grazing . .. .112 Mining . .. .. .113 Roads and Urbanization .
    [Show full text]
  • NPDES Water Bodies
    Attachment A: Detailed list of receiving water bodies within the Marin/Sonoma Mosquito Control District boundaries under the jurisdiction of Regional Water Quality Control Boards One and Two This list of watercourses in the San Francisco Bay Area groups rivers, creeks, sloughs, etc. according to the bodies of water they flow into. Tributaries are listed under the watercourses they feed, sorted by the elevation of the confluence so that tributaries entering nearest the sea appear they first. Numbers in parentheses are Geographic Nantes Information System feature ids. Watercourses which feed into the Pacific Ocean in Sonoma County north of Bodega Head, listed from north to south:W The Gualala River and its tributaries • Gualala River (253221): o North Fork (229679) - flows from Mendocino County. o South Fork (235010): Big Pepperwood Creek (219227) - flows from Mendocino County. • Rockpile Creek (231751) - flows from Mendocino County. Buckeye Creek (220029): Little Creek (227239) North Fork Buckeye Crcck (229647): Osser Creek (230143) • Roy Creek (231987) • Soda Springs Creek (234853) Wheatfield Fork (237594): Fuller Creek (223983): • Sullivan Crcck (235693) Boyd Creek (219738) • North Fork Fuller Creek (229676) South Fork Fuller Creek (235005) Haupt Creek (225023) • Tobacco Creek (236406) Elk Creek (223108) • )`louse Creek (225688): Soda Spring Creek (234845) Allen Creek (218142) Peppeawood Creek (230514): • Danfield Creek (222007): • Cow Creek (221691) • Jim Creek (226237) • Grasshopper Creek (224470) Britain Creek (219851) • Cedar Creek (220760) • Wolf Creek (238086) • Tombs Crock (236448) • Marshall Creek (228139): • McKenzie Creek (228391) Northern Sonoma Coast Watercourses which feed into the Pacific Ocean in Sonoma County between the Gualala and Russian Rivers, numbered from north to south: 1.
    [Show full text]
  • National Register of Historic Places Registration Form 1C
    NPS Form 10-900 OMBNo. 1024-0018 (Oct. 1990) United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Registration Form This form is for use in nominating or requesting determinations for individual properti Complete the National Register of Historic Places Registration Form (National Register Bulletin 16A). Complete each item by e appropriate box or by entering the information requested. If any item does not apply to the property being documented, enter "N/A" for "not applicable." For functions, architectural classification, materials, and areas of significance, enter only categories and subcategories from the instructions. Place additional entries and narrative items on continuation sheets (NPS Form 10-900a). Use a typewriter, word processor, or computer, to complete all items. 1. Name of Property___________________________________________________ historic name Ellis-Martin House_____________________________________ other names/site number Martin House, Ellis, John D., House_ 2. Location street & number 1197 E. Washington Street N/A O not for publication city or town Petaluma N/A H] vicinity state California________code CA county Sonoma_ code 097_ zip code 94952 3. State/Federal Agency Certification As the designated authority under the Natior al Historic Preservation Act of 1986, as amended, I hereby certify that this _3 nomination D request fot-d,et 3rmination of eligibility i ne sts the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Plages ar d meets the procequra ar d professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60. In my opinion, the property I3 meets tj does not meet the National \e ister Criteria. I recommend that this property be considered significant D nationally DstatewiMAiaic cally.
    [Show full text]
  • Glisan, Rodney L. Collection
    Glisan, Rodney L. Collection Object ID VM1993.001.003 Scope & Content Series 3: The Outing Committee of the Multnomah Athletic Club sponsored hiking and climbing trips for its members. Rodney Glisan participated as a leader on some of these events. As many as 30 people participated on these hikes. They usually travelled by train to the vicinity of the trailhead, and then took motor coaches or private cars for the remainder of the way. Of the four hikes that are recorded Mount Saint Helens was the first climb undertaken by the Club. On the Beacon Rock hike Lower Hardy Falls on the nearby Hamilton Mountain trail were rechristened Rodney Falls in honor of the "mountaineer" Rodney Glisan. Trips included Mount Saint Helens Climb, July 4 and 5, 1915; Table Mountain Hike, November 14, 1915; Mount Adams Climb, July 1, 1916; and Beacon Rock Hike, November 4, 1917. Date 1915; 1916; 1917 People Allen, Art Blakney, Clem E. English, Nelson Evans, Bill Glisan, Rodney L. Griffin, Margaret Grilley, A.M. Jones, Frank I. Jones, Tom Klepper, Milton Reed Lee, John A. McNeil, Fred Hutchison Newell, Ben W. Ormandy, Jim Sammons, Edward C. Smedley, Georgian E. Stadter, Fred W. Thatcher, Guy Treichel, Chester Wolbers, Harry L. Subjects Adams, Mount (Wash.) Bird Creek Meadows Castle Rock (Wash.) Climbs--Mazamas--Saint Helens, Mount Eyrie Hell Roaring Canyon Mount Saint Helens--Photographs Multnomah Amatuer Athletic Association Spirit Lake (Wash.) Table Mountain--Columbia River Gorge (Wash.) Trout Lake (Wash.) Creator Glisan, Rodney L. Container List 07 05 Mt. St. Helens Climb, July 4-5,1915 News clipping.
    [Show full text]
  • Southern Sonoma County Storm Water Resources Plan
    Final - Update 1 SOUTHERN SONOMA COUNTY STORM WATER RESOURCES PLAN Prepared by May 2019 Sonoma Water Final - Update 1 SOUTHERN SONOMA COUNTY STORM WATER RESOURCES PLAN Prepared by May 2019 Sonoma Water 1425 N. McDowell Boulevard Suite 200 Petaluma, CA 94954 707.795.0900 www.esassoc.com Bend Oakland San Francisco Camarillo Orlando Santa Monica Delray Beach Pasadena Sarasota Destin Petaluma Seattle Irvine Portland Sunrise Los Angeles Sacramento Tampa Miami San Diego D170210.01 PLAN COLLABORATORS Funding has been provided in full or in part through an agreement with the State Water Resources Control Board using funds from Proposition 1. The contents of this document do not necessarily reflect the views and policies of the foregoing, nor does mention of trade names or commercial products constitute endorsement or recommendation for use. OUR COMMITMENT TO SUSTAINABILITY | ESA helps a variety of public and private sector clients plan and prepare for climate change and emerging regulations that limit GHG emissions. ESA is a registered assessor with the California Climate Action Registry, a Climate Leader, and founding reporter for the Climate Registry. ESA is also a corporate member of the U.S. Green Building Council and the Business Council on Climate Change (BC3). Internally, ESA has adopted a Sustainability Vision and Policy Statement and a plan to reduce waste and energy within our operations. This document was produced using recycled paper. TABLE OF CONTENTS Southern Sonoma County Storm Water Resources Plan Page Executive Summary ........................................................................................................ ES-1 Background .............................................................................................................. ES-1 Southern Sonoma County Watersheds .................................................................... ES-1 Stakeholder Engagement and Plan Implementation ................................................ ES-4 Quantitative Methodologies and Identification and Prioritization of Projects ...........
    [Show full text]