DOCSLIB.ORG

Index to River Surveys Made by The

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

If you no lon~rer need this publication write to the Geological Survey in Washington for an official mailing label to use in returning it UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR • INDEX TO RIVER SURVEYS MADE BY THE I• UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY AND OTHER AGENCIES REVISED TO JULY 1, 1947 GEOLOGICAL SURVEY WATER-SUPPLY PAPER 995 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR J. A. Krug, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY W. E. •Wrather, Director Water-Supply Paper 995 INDEX TO RIVER SURVEYS MADE BY THR UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY AND OTHER AGENCIES REVISED TO JULY 1, 1947 BY _BENJAMIN E. JONES and RANDOLPH 0. HELLAND UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE WASHINGTON : 1948 Ji', r s'lle bv the Superintendent of Documents, U. S. Government Printing Office, Washinglnu 25, D. C. Pr-ice 75 cents CONTENTS Page Introduction _____________________________________________________ _ 1 Alabama---------------------------------------------------------Alaska __________________________________________________________ _ 4 4 Arizona---------------------------------------------------------­ 5 Arkansas--------------------------------------------------------­ 11 12 California--------------------------------------------------------Colorado ________________________________________________________ _ 23 Connecticut------------------------------------------------------- 30 I>elaware ________________________________________________________ _ 30 I>istrict of Columbia ______________________________________________ _ 30 Florida __________________________________________________________ _ 30 Georgia _________________________________________________________ _ 30 Hawaii __________________________________________________________ _ 34 Idaho------------------------------------------------~----------- 34 Illinois __________________________________________________________ _ 46 Indiana _________________________________________________________ _ 49 Iowa ____________________________________________________________ _ 49 lCansas __________________________________________________________ _ 50 lCentuckY-------------------------------------------------------- 50 Louisiana ________________________________________________________ _ 50 ~aine ___________________________________________________________ _ 50 ~aryland _______________________________________________________ _ 54 ~assachusetts ___________________________________________________ _ 55 ~ichigan ________________________________________________________ _ 56 ~innesota _______________________________________________________ _ 56 ~ississippi _______________________________________________________ _ 59 ~issouri _________________________________________________________ _ 59 ~ontana ________________________________________________________ _ 60 ~ebraska--------------------------------------------------------~ 64 ~evada _________________________________________________________ _ 6'5 ~ewiiampshire __________________________________________________ _ 68 ~ewJerseY------------------------------------------------------~ 68 ~ew ~exico _____________________________________________________ _ 68 ·~ewYork _______________________________________________________ _ 71 North Carolina ___________________________________________________ _ 75 North I>akota---------------------------------------~------------- 77 Ohio ____________________________________________________________ _ 78 Oklahoma _______________________________________________________ _ 78 Oregon __________________________________________________________ _ 78 Pennsylvania ___________ ·- ______________________________________ - __ 94 Rhode Island ____________________________________________________ _ 97 South Carolina ___________________________________________________ _ 97 South I>akota ____________________________________________________ _ 98 Tennessee ___________ ~-------------------------------------------- 98 III IV CONTENTS Page Texas____________________________________________________________ 99 1Jtah----------------------------------··-------------------------- 102 Vermont_________________________________________________________ 110 Virginia__________________________________________________________ 111 Washington ____________________________________________ .. _____ .. ____ 112 West Virginia _____ .. _______________________________________________ 129 Wisconsin ______________________________________________________ .. _ 130 Wyoming ________ .. ______________________________________ .. ___ .. _ __ _ _ 131 Index---------------------------------------·--------------------- 137 ILLUSTRATIONS Page PLATE 1. Map showing areas covered by topographic surveys made by the Geological Survey prior to .July 1, 1947 _________________ In pocket 2. Map of the 1Jnited States sho,•.ring drainage areas and index n u m hers_ __ _ __ __ _ _ __ __ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ __ __ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ In poe ket INDEX TO RIVER SURVEYS MADE BY THE UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY AND OTHER AGENCIES REVISED TO JuLY l, 1947 By BENJAl\HN E. JoNES and RANDOLPH 0. HELLAND INTRODUCTION The descriptive list of surveys of rivers in the United States issued by the United States Geological Survey in 1926 as Water-Supply Paper 558 cmnprised surveys by the Ge.ological Survey and other Fed­ eral bureaus and by State, semiofficial, and private agencies. Since then many additional river surveys, most of them now availabie in published sheets, have been completed by the Geologieal Survey, and tour supplemental lists deseribing the1n have been issued in miineo­ graphed form. The first supplement was compiled by B. E. Jones in 1!J34, the seeoncl by R. 0. Helland and D. M. Paul in 1938, the third by R. 0. Helland in 1940, and the fourth by L. L. Young and N. J. Tubbs in 1944. The present cmnpilation adds to the preliminary in­ dex the material issued in the supplem.ents and later information con­ cerning revisions and availability of 1naps. This eompilation substantially cmnpletes the reeorcl of river surveys by the Geological Survey prior to July 1, 1947, but it is l.wt intended as a con1plete index of those made by other agencies. Outstanding among such are the Corps of Engineers of the United States Army, the Bureau of Reclamation of the Departlnent of the Interior, and anum­ ber of State agencies. Many States have assembled and published valuable information on &treams and lakes within their boundaries; their contour maps were prepared on various scales and in varying detail. Information con­ cerning 1naps published by a State agency can usually be obtained by applying to the State engineer. · River surveys by the Geological Survey consist essentially of a plane­ table traverse of the stream, the topography adjacent to the stream ehannel being depicted by contour lines. Topography is sketched in the field and is based on altitudes and distances obtained by the alidade and stadia rod. Except in earlier river surveys, topography is gen­ erally carried to an elevation sufficiently high above the water surface 1 2 INDEX TO RIVER SURVEYS to include the area of proposed reservoir sites, possible canal or conduit locations, and other structures relating to water utilization. The standard scales of river surveys are 1:31,680 and 1:24,000 and the contour intervals in general use are 20 feet on land and 5 feet on water. Surveys made by the United States Geological Survey ar~ usually pub­ lished by this agency, only a very few having been published by other agencies. All of the maps described in this index have been published by the United States Geological Survey unless otherwise stated in the description of the map. Most of the river surveys of the Geological Survey are now available in printed sheets 22 by 28 inches, currently priced at 10 cents each. Not all are available, however, as the stock of a map may be exhausted at any time, and reprints are not always made. But if the printed sheet is not obtainable, a photostatic reproduction or blueprint can usually be secured, though the cost of reproduction is higher than the cost of the printed sheet. Any of the maps described may be seen at the main office of the Geological Survey, Federal Works Building, Eighteenth and F Streets NW., Washington, D. C., and many of them at branch office-s in the States in which the surveys were made. Many of the rivers and smaller streams which have not been sur­ veyed independently are shown on the standard topographic maps of the Geological Survey in sufficient detail to afford much valuable in­ formation. The areas covered prior to July 1, 1947, and the scale employed for each area, are shown on plate 1. Inquiries regarding availability of maps should be addressed to the Director, United States Geological Survey, Department of the Interior, Washington 25, D. C. In this compilation the surveys have been arranged by States, and within the States by drainage basins. Tributary streams are indi­ cated by letters. A stream 1narked " (a)" is tributary to the last­ named stream not marked with a letter; a stream marked " (b)" is trib­ utary to the last-named strean1 marked " (a)", and so on. In the Great Basin, tributaries of Great Salt Lake. and of other independent drainage systems are indicated by " (a) ." The index number made up of letters and figures in parentheses refers to the drainage-area subdivisions shown on plate 2. The num­ bers refer to the major areas that form the great drainage basins of the country, as classified b'y the Geological Survey in its publications on stream flow and by theWeather Bureau in its meteorologic reports.
Recommended publications
  • Penobscot Rivershed with Licensed Dischargers and Critical Salmon

    Penobscot Rivershed with Licensed Dischargers and Critical Salmon

    0# North West Branch St John T11 R15 WELS T11 R17 WELS T11 R16 WELS T11 R14 WELS T11 R13 WELS T11 R12 WELS T11 R11 WELS T11 R10 WELS T11 R9 WELS T11 R8 WELS Aroostook River Oxbow Smith Farm DamXW St John River T11 R7 WELS Garfield Plt T11 R4 WELS Chapman Ashland Machias River Stream Carry Brook Chemquasabamticook Stream Squa Pan Stream XW Daaquam River XW Whitney Bk Dam Mars Hill Squa Pan Dam Burntland Stream DamXW Westfield Prestile Stream Presque Isle Stream FRESH WAY, INC Allagash River South Branch Machias River Big Ten Twp T10 R16 WELS T10 R15 WELS T10 R14 WELS T10 R13 WELS T10 R12 WELS T10 R11 WELS T10 R10 WELS T10 R9 WELS T10 R8 WELS 0# MARS HILL UTILITY DISTRICT T10 R3 WELS Water District Resevoir Dam T10 R7 WELS T10 R6 WELS Masardis Squapan Twp XW Mars Hill DamXW Mule Brook Penobscot RiverYosungs Lakeh DamXWed0# Southwest Branch St John Blackwater River West Branch Presque Isle Strea Allagash River North Branch Blackwater River East Branch Presque Isle Strea Blaine Churchill Lake DamXW Southwest Branch St John E Twp XW Robinson Dam Prestile Stream S Otter Brook L Saint Croix Stream Cox Patent E with Licensed Dischargers and W Snare Brook T9 R8 WELS 8 T9 R17 WELS T9 R16 WELS T9 R15 WELS T9 R14 WELS 1 T9 R12 WELS T9 R11 WELS T9 R10 WELS T9 R9 WELS Mooseleuk Stream Oxbow Plt R T9 R13 WELS Houlton Brook T9 R7 WELS Aroostook River T9 R4 WELS T9 R3 WELS 9 Chandler Stream Bridgewater T T9 R5 WELS TD R2 WELS Baker Branch Critical UmScolcus Stream lmon Habitat Overlay South Branch Russell Brook Aikens Brook West Branch Umcolcus Steam LaPomkeag Stream West Branch Umcolcus Stream Tie Camp Brook Soper Brook Beaver Brook Munsungan Stream S L T8 R18 WELS T8 R17 WELS T8 R16 WELS T8 R15 WELS T8 R14 WELS Eagle Lake Twp T8 R10 WELS East Branch Howe Brook E Soper Mountain Twp T8 R11 WELS T8 R9 WELS T8 R8 WELS Bloody Brook Saint Croix Stream North Branch Meduxnekeag River W 9 Turner Brook Allagash Stream Millinocket Stream T8 R7 WELS T8 R6 WELS T8 R5 WELS Saint Croix Twp T8 R3 WELS 1 Monticello R Desolation Brook 8 St Francis Brook TC R2 WELS MONTICELLO HOUSING CORP.
  • Stream-Temperature Characteristics in Georgia

    Stream-Temperature Characteristics in Georgia

    STREAM-TEMPERATURE CHARACTERISTICS IN GEORGIA By T.R. Dyar and S.J. Alhadeff ______________________________________________________________________________ U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Water-Resources Investigations Report 96-4203 Prepared in cooperation with GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION DIVISION Atlanta, Georgia 1997 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR BRUCE BABBITT, Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Charles G. Groat, Director For additional information write to: Copies of this report can be purchased from: District Chief U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Geological Survey Branch of Information Services 3039 Amwiler Road, Suite 130 Denver Federal Center Peachtree Business Center Box 25286 Atlanta, GA 30360-2824 Denver, CO 80225-0286 CONTENTS Page Abstract . 1 Introduction . 1 Purpose and scope . 2 Previous investigations. 2 Station-identification system . 3 Stream-temperature data . 3 Long-term stream-temperature characteristics. 6 Natural stream-temperature characteristics . 7 Regression analysis . 7 Harmonic mean coefficient . 7 Amplitude coefficient. 10 Phase coefficient . 13 Statewide harmonic equation . 13 Examples of estimating natural stream-temperature characteristics . 15 Panther Creek . 15 West Armuchee Creek . 15 Alcovy River . 18 Altamaha River . 18 Summary of stream-temperature characteristics by river basin . 19 Savannah River basin . 19 Ogeechee River basin. 25 Altamaha River basin. 25 Satilla-St Marys River basins. 26 Suwannee-Ochlockonee River basins . 27 Chattahoochee River basin. 27 Flint River basin. 28 Coosa River basin. 29 Tennessee River basin . 31 Selected references. 31 Tabular data . 33 Graphs showing harmonic stream-temperature curves of observed data and statewide harmonic equation for selected stations, figures 14-211 . 51 iii ILLUSTRATIONS Page Figure 1. Map showing locations of 198 periodic and 22 daily stream-temperature stations, major river basins, and physiographic provinces in Georgia.
  • USFWS 99 Savannah River Study

    USFWS 99 Savannah River Study

    RECONNAISSANCE PLANNING AID REPORT ON SAVANNAH RIVER BASIN STUDY Prepared by: Edwin M. EuDaly Under the Supervision of Roger L. Banks, Field Supervisor Division of Ecological Services Charleston, South Carolina July 1999 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Southeast Region Atlanta, Georgia TABLE OF CONTENTS Page EXECUTIVE SUMMARY................................................................................................iii INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................... 1 AUTHORITY ...................................................................................................... 1 PURPOSE AND SCOPE .............................................................................. 1 PRIOR STUDIES AND REPORTS ................................................................... 1 DESCRIPTION OF STUDY AREA .............................................................................. 3 FISH AND WILDLIFE RESOURCES ...................................................................... 7 FISH ......................................................................................................................... 7 WETLANDS .............................................................................................................. 8 WILDLIFE ................................................................................................................. 9 ENDANGERED SPECIES ...................................................................................... 10 PROBLEMS,
  • Fish River Scenic Byway

    Fish River Scenic Byway

    Fish River Scenic Byway State Route 11 Aroostook County Corridor Management Plan St. John Valley Region of Northern Maine Prepared by: Prepared by: December 2006 Northern Maine Development Commission 11 West Presque Isle Road, PO Box 779 ­ Caribou, Maine 04736 Phone: (207) 498­8736 Toll Free in Maine: (800) 427­8736 TABLE OF CONTENTS Summary ...............................................................................................................................................................3 Why This Byway?...................................................................................................................................................5 Importance of the Byway ...................................................................................................................................5 What’s it Like?...............................................................................................................................................6 Historic and Cultural Resources .....................................................................................................................9 Recreational Resources ............................................................................................................................... 10 A Vision for the Fish River Scenic Byway Corridor................................................................................................ 15 Goals, Objectives and Strategies.........................................................................................................................
  • Regulatory Guide 1.59 Design Basis Floods for Nuclear Power Plants

    Regulatory Guide 1.59 Design Basis Floods for Nuclear Power Plants

    Revision 2 - U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION August 1077 C, REGULATORYGUIDE OFFICE OF STANDARDS DEVELOPMENT REGULATORY GUIDE 1.59 DESIGN BASIS FLOODS FOR NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS USNRC REGULATORY GUIDES Comments Ohould be sent to the Secretary of the Commission, US. Nuclear Regu latory Commision. Washington, D.C. 2055, Attention: Docketing and Service Regulatory Guides or* ihsed to describe and make available to the public methods Branch. acceptable to the NRC staff of Implementing specific parts of the Commission's regulations, to delineate techniques used by the staff in evaluating specific problems The gluides e issued in the following ten broad divisions: at postulated accidents. or to provide guidance to applicants. Regulatory Guides are not sub•titute& for regulations, and compliance with them ia not required. 1. Power Reactors 6. Products Methods and solutions different from those mt out in the guides will be accept 2. Research and Test Reactors 7. Transportation 3. Fuels end Materials Facilities S. Occupational Health able if they provide a basis for the findings requisite to the issuance or continuance 4. Environmental end Siting 9. Antitrust Review of a permit or license by the Commission. S. Materials nd Plant Protection 10. General Comments and suggestions for Improvements In these guides erai ncounrged at ll Requests for single copies of issued guides (which may be reproduced) or for place timnes. end guides will be revised, as appropriale. to accommnodate comments and ment on an automatic distribution list for single copies of future guides in specific to reflect new information or experience. This guide was revised as a result of divisions should be made in writing to the US.
  • Chemical Character of Surface Waters of Georgia

    Chemical Character of Surface Waters of Georgia

    SliEU' :\0..... / ........ RO O ~ l NO. ···- ··-<~ ......... U )'On no l~er need this publication write to the Geological Sur»ey in Washlndon for ali official maillne label to use In returning it UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR CHEMICAL CHARACTER OF SURFACE WATERS OF GEORGIA Prepared In cooperation wilh the DIVISION OF MINES, MINING, AND GEOLOGY OF 'l'HE GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY WATER-SUPPLY PAPER 889- E ' UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Harold L. Ickes, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY W. E. Wrather, Director Water-Supply Paper 889-E CHEMICAL CHARACTER OF SURFACE WATERS OF GEORGIA BY WILLIAM L. LAMAR Prepared in cooperation with the DIVISION OF MINES, MINING, AND GEOLOGY OF THE GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES Contributions to the Hydrology of the United States, 19~1-!3 (Pages 317- 380) UN ITED STATES GOVEHNMENT PRINTING OFFICE WASHINGTON : 1944 For sct le Ly Ll w S upcrinkntlent of Doc uments, U. S. Gover nme nt Printing Office, " ' asbingtou 25, D . C. Price 15 ce nl~ CONTENTS Page- Abstract ___________________________________________ -----_--------- 31 T Introduction __________________ c ________________________________ -- _ 317 Physiography_____________________________________________________ 318 Climate__________________________________________________________ 820 Collection and examination of samples_______________________________ 323 Stream flow __________________________ --------- ___________ c ________ . 324 Rainfall and discharge during sampling years_____________________
  • Upper Goulburn River Catchment Local Management Rules

    Upper Goulburn River Catchment Local Management Rules

    UPPER GOULBURN RIVER CATCHMENT LOCAL MANAGEMENT RULES 1. Catchment Information 3. Compliance Point The Goulburn River flows into Lake Eildon near the There is a surface water monitoring station located township of Jamieson and encompasses an area of upstream of Jamieson on the Mansfield-Woods Point approximately 750 km2. The mean annual flow at the Road. The site is called the Goulburn River @ Dohertys. bottom of the Upper Goulburn River catchment is approximately 357,000 ML/yr, which flows into the 4. Licences headwaters of Eildon. The Goulburn Broken Regional Licence Allocation in the Upper Goulburn River and River Health Strategy lists the Goulburn River above Tributaries Eildon as a high value asset as it is classed as an Licence Type Number of Volume (ML) ecologically healthy river containing Macquarie Perch, Licences Barred Galaxias, and the Spotted Tree Frog. Irrigation 59 130 Total 59 130 The catchment is bound to the west by the Big River catchment, the east by the Macalister River and the 5. Additional Information north by the Jamieson River catchment. Significant Stream codes and sustainable diversion limit zones are tributaries of the upper Goulburn include the Snake, provided within this document for identification Webber, Gaffneys, Moonlight, Edwards and Pheasant purposes when discussing the catchment diversion Creeks and the Black River. The main townships in the management with Goulburn-Murray Water Officers. catchment include Kevington, Knockwood, and Woods Point. The catchment is predominantly a forested Stream Codes catchment with small pockets of cleared land around Stream codes used in the management of the Upper the townships within the valleys.
  • WSP Report 2012

    WSP Report 2012

    Watershed Stewardship Program Summary of Programs and Research 2012 Watershed Stewardship Program Report # AWI 2013-01 Executive Summary and Introduction 2 Table of Contents Executive Summary and Introduction........................................................................................................... 4 West-Central Adirondack Region Summary ............................................................................................... 17 Staff Profiles ................................................................................................................................................ 22 Chateaugay Lake Boat Launch Use Report ................................................................................................. 29 Cranberry Lake Boat Launch Use Study ...................................................................................................... 36 Fourth Lake Boat Launch Use Report ......................................................................................................... 45 Lake Flower and Second Pond Boat Launch Use Study .............................................................................. 58 Lake Placid State and Village Boat Launch Use Study ................................................................................. 72 Long Lake Boat Launch Use Study .............................................................................................................. 84 Meacham Lake Campground Boat Launch Use Study ...............................................................................
  • Southern Sonoma County Stormwater Resources Plan Evaluation Process

    Southern Sonoma County Stormwater Resources Plan Evaluation Process

    Appendix A List of Stakeholders Engaged APPENDIX A List of Stakeholders Engaged Specific audiences engaged in the planning process are identified below. These audiences include: cities, government officials, landowners, public land managers, locally regulated commercial, agricultural and industrial stakeholders, non-governmental organizations, mosquito and vector control districts and the general public. TABLE 1 LIST OF STAKEHOLDERS ENGAGED Organization Type Watershed 1st District Supervisor Government Sonoma 5th District Supervisor Government Petaluma City of Petaluma Government Petaluma City of Sonoma Government Sonoma Daily Acts Non-Governmental Petaluma Friends of the Petaluma River Non-Governmental Petaluma Zone 2A Petaluma River Watershed- Flood Control Government Petaluma Advisory Committee Zone 3A Valley of the Moon - Flood Control Advisory Government Sonoma Committee Marin Sonoma Mosquito & Vector Control District Special District Both Sonoma Ecology Center Non-Governmental Sonoma Sonoma County Regional Parks Government Both Sonoma County Agricultural Preservation and Open Government Both Space District Sonoma Land Trust Non-Governmental Both Sonoma County Transportation and Public Works Government Both Valley of the Moon Water District Government Sonoma Sonoma Resource Conservation District Special District Both Sonoma County Permit Sonoma Government Both Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Non-Governmental N/A California State Parks Government Both California State Water Resources Control Board Government N/A Southern Sonoma
  • Maine Open Water Fishing Laws Summary, 1975 Maine Department of Inland Fisheries and Game

    Maine Open Water Fishing Laws Summary, 1975 Maine Department of Inland Fisheries and Game

    Maine State Library Digital Maine Inland Fisheries and Wildlife Law Books Inland Fisheries and Wildlife 1-1-1975 Maine Open Water Fishing Laws Summary, 1975 Maine Department of Inland Fisheries and Game Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalmaine.com/ifw_law_books Recommended Citation Maine Department of Inland Fisheries and Game, "Maine Open Water Fishing Laws Summary, 1975" (1975). Inland Fisheries and Wildlife Law Books. 301. https://digitalmaine.com/ifw_law_books/301 This Text is brought to you for free and open access by the Inland Fisheries and Wildlife at Digital Maine. It has been accepted for inclusion in Inland Fisheries and Wildlife Law Books by an authorized administrator of Digital Maine. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Maine Open Water Fishing Laws Summary Maine Department of Inland Fisheries and Game 284 State Street, Augusta, Maine 04330 0££K) auie^M 'e+snSny '+994S 9+p+S VQZ FISHING LICENSES Commissioner of Indian Affairs stating that the person described is an awe0 pue sauaijsij pupguj jo juauupiedaQ auip^Aj Indian and a member of that tribe. For this purpose, an Indian shall RESIDENT NONRESIDENT be any member on tribal lists of the Penobscot and Passamaquoddy 16 years and older . $ 6.50 Season: age 16 and older $15.50 Tribes, or a person on the membership list of the Association of Combination ............. 10.50 12-15 years inclusive .. 2.50 Aroostook Indians and who has resided in Maine for at least 5 years. ‘ 3-day . ’ 6.50 15-day* “ ........................ 10.50 “ Leave or furlough . 2.50 7-day ................................. 7.50 3-day ................................
  • Rangeley Lake Fish Management

    Rangeley Lake Fish Management

    RANGELEY LAKE FISH MANAGEMENT Maine Department of Inland Fisheries and Wildlife Fisheries Research Bulletin No. 10 Rangeley Village with City Cove shown to the left. RANGELEY LAKE FISHERY MANAGEMENT By Raymond A. Dt'Sandre Regional Fishery Biologist, Region D Charles F. Ritzi Environmental Coordinator and William L. Woodward Assistant Regional Fishery Biologist, Region D Maynard F. Marsh, Commissioner 1977 Published Under Appropriation 4550 TABLE OF CONTENTS RANGELEY LAKE FISHERY MANAGEMENT INTRODUCTION.......................................................................................... 1 DESCRIPTION OF RANGELEY LAKE ................................................ 3 CHARACTERISTICS OF THE SALMON POPULATION Introduction........................................................................................ 6 Growth and Longevity..................................................................... 6 Natural Reproduction....................................................................... 7 Dodge Pond Stream ................................................................ 7 Long Pond Stream (Greenvale Stream ).............................. 8 Rangeley Lake O u tle t............................................................ 11 Evaluation of Salmon Stocking ..................................................... 12 Stocking history and study methods......................................12 Representation of hatchery salmon in the lake population . 14 Stocking assessment and conclusions ................................ 14 a) Effects of
  • Rivers and Streams Special Investigation Final Recommendations

    Rivers and Streams Special Investigation Final Recommendations

    LAND CONSERVATION COUNCIL RIVERS AND STREAMS SPECIAL INVESTIGATION FINAL RECOMMENDATIONS June 1991 This text is a facsimile of the former Land Conservation Council’s Rivers and Streams Special Investigation Final Recommendations. It has been edited to incorporate Government decisions on the recommendations made by Order in Council dated 7 July 1992, and subsequent formal amendments. Added text is shown underlined; deleted text is shown struck through. Annotations [in brackets] explain the origins of the changes. MEMBERS OF THE LAND CONSERVATION COUNCIL D.H.F. Scott, B.A. (Chairman) R.W. Campbell, B.Vet.Sc., M.B.A.; Director - Natural Resource Systems, Department of Conservation and Environment (Deputy Chairman) D.M. Calder, M.Sc., Ph.D., M.I.Biol. W.A. Chamley, B.Sc., D.Phil.; Director - Fisheries Management, Department of Conservation and Environment S.M. Ferguson, M.B.E. M.D.A. Gregson, E.D., M.A.F., Aus.I.M.M.; General Manager - Minerals, Department of Manufacturing and Industry Development A.E.K. Hingston, B.Behav.Sc., M.Env.Stud., Cert.Hort. P. Jerome, B.A., Dip.T.R.P., M.A.; Director - Regional Planning, Department of Planning and Housing M.N. Kinsella, B.Ag.Sc., M.Sci., F.A.I.A.S.; Manager - Quarantine and Inspection Services, Department of Agriculture K.J. Langford, B.Eng.(Ag)., Ph.D , General Manager - Rural Water Commission R.D. Malcolmson, M.B.E., B.Sc., F.A.I.M., M.I.P.M.A., M.Inst.P., M.A.I.P. D.S. Saunders, B.Agr.Sc., M.A.I.A.S.; Director - National Parks and Public Land, Department of Conservation and Environment K.J.