Revista Mexicana De Biodiversidad

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Revista Mexicana De Biodiversidad Revista Mexicana de Biodiversidad Revista Mexicana de Biodiversidad 91 (2020): e913234 Taxonomy and systematics The species of the genus Physoconops (Diptera: Conopidae) from Chile, with the description of a new species Las especies del género Physoconops (Diptera: Conopidae) de Chile, con la descripción de una especie nueva Rodrigo M. Barahona-Segovia a, b, *, Vicente Valdés-Guzmánb, Laura Pañinao-Monsálvez b, c a Departamento de Ciencias Biológicas y Biodiversidad, Universidad de Los Lagos, Av. Fuschlöcher 1305, 5290000 Osorno, Chile b Citizen Science Program Moscas Florícolas de Chile, Pje. Arizona 4067a, 8420000 Santiago, Chile c Facultad de Ciencias Forestales, Universidad de Concepción, Victoria 500, 4030000 Concepción, Chile *Corresponding author: [email protected] (R.M. Barahona-Segovia) Received: 4 October 2019; accepted: 26 February 2020 http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:98BCC05E-4587-494C-B033-324CAB051B47 Abstract Thick-headed flies (Conopidae) are a family of Diptera with species that are endoparasitoids of bees and aculeate wasps. Physoconops is represented by 64 species in the Neotropical and Andean regions and distributed in many countries. Only 3 species have been described for Chile, specifically from the northern area. In this work, a new species from the Valdivian evergreen forest, Physoconops tentenvilu n. sp., is described and a new key for the Chilean species is provided. In addition, P. tentevilu represents the southernmost record of this genus in Chile. Morphological aspects are discussed, as well as hosts and distribution gaps for the Chilean Physoconops species. Keywords: Bee host; Hotspot; Mapuche myth; Megachile; Valdivian evergreen forest Resumen Las moscas de cabeza ancha (Conopidae) son una familia de Diptera cuyas especies son parasitoides de abejas y avispas. Physoconops se encuentra representado por 64 especies en las regiones Neotropical y Andina, distribuidas en varios países. Solo 3 especies han sido registradas para Chile, especialmente para la zona norte del país. En este trabajo, se describe una especie nueva del bosque valdiviano siempreverde, Physoconops tentenvilu n. sp., y se presenta una nueva clave taxonómica para los representantes chilenos de este género. Además, P. tentenvilu representa el registro más austral conocido para este género en Chile. Se discuten aspectos morfológicos, así como los huéspedes y vacíos distribucionales para las especies chilenas de Physoconops. Palabras clave: Huésped abeja; Punto caliente; Mito mapuche; Megachile; Bosque valdiviano siempreverde ISSN versión electrónica: 2007-8706; Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Instituto de Biología. Open Access bajo la licencia CC BY-NC-ND (4.0) https://doi.org/10.22201/ib.20078706e.2020.91.3234 R.M. Barahona-Segovia et al. / Revista Mexicana de Biodiversidad 91 (2020): e913234 2 https://doi.org/10.22201/ib.20078706e.2020.91.3234 Introduction 1888; Stuardo, 1946; Stuke, 2017). The natural history or biology has never been described and represents one of Thick-headed flies (Diptera: Conopidae) are composed the most poorly studied families of Diptera in Chile. This for 863 species worldwide (Stuke, 2017). This family is work is aimed to describe a new species of Physonocops known due to their endoparasitoid behavior mainly on from the Valdivian evergreen forest in southern Chile. aculeate Hymenoptera, although the genus Stylogaster In addition, we provide a checklist, new records, and a Macquart can also parasitize cockroaches and crickets pictorial key for identification of all Physoconops species (Freeman, 1966; Gibson & Skevington, 2013; Lopes, recorded for Chile. 1937; Marshall, 2012; Skevington et al., 2010; Stuke, 2017; Woodley & Judd, 1998). The female has a terminalia Materials and methods adapted for engaging bees or wasps and clasping the abdominal tergites of the host for oviposition (Smith, 1966). A review of the Physoconops was based on material In order to do this, surveillance sites to detect possible deposited in collections from the following institutions: hosts are used by females to assault bees or wasp with their Instituto de Entomología, Universidad Metropolitana in-flight attack system (Freeman, 1966; Marshall, 2012; de Ciencias de la Educación, Santiago, Chile (UMCE); Stuke, 2017). Other activities as pollination or hill toping Ernesto Krahmer collection, Universidad Austral de Chile, behavior have been less studied in this family (Kendall & Valdivia, Chile (UACH); Zoology Museum, Universidad Solomon, 1973; Marshall, 2012; Skevington et al., 2010). de Concepción, Concepción, Chile (MZUC); and From all biogeographical regions, the Neotropical and Universidad de Tarapacá, Arica, Chile (UTA). In addition, Andean have more species described to date (221 species; electronical records from the “Moscas Florícolas de Chile” Stuke, 2017). Almost all subfamilies are represented, Citizen Science Project (CSP) were obtained and deposited except for Notoconopinae and Palaeomyopinae (Stuke, in a figshare repository database. From UACH, a couple 2017). The most diverse subfamilies are Zodioninae, of thick-headed flies were assigned to the genus studied Stylogastrinae and Conopinae with 39, 73 and 96 species, using the keys of Camras (1955), Kröber (1915), and Stuke respectively (Stuke, 2017). In this last subfamily, Conops and Skevington (2007). The description of the new species Linnaeus, Physocephala Schiner and Physoconops Szilady follows the terminology proposed by Cumming and Wood are the most diverse genera (Stuke, 2017). The latter is (2017). Measurements were taken with a 1-mm precision composed of 64 species distributed mainly in the Nearctic ruler in the objective of a Leica S6 D microscope. Total and Neotropics and only 2 species are described from the length was measured from the head to the end of terminal Oriental region (Skevington et al., 2010; Stuke, 2017). tergite and wing length was measured from the base to Physoconops presents high richness with 57 species the apex. Photographs were taken with a Nikon D7200 distributed from Mexico to northern Chile and central camera, equipped with AF-S DX Micro-NIKKOR 40mm Argentina (Gibson et al., 2014; Stuke, 2017). Species of f/2.8G and extension tubes. this genus have been studied in part by Kröber (1915, Contents of each label are enclosed within double 1927), describing many species under the genus Conops. quotation marks (“ ”) and individual lines of information Camras (1955, 1957) described new species and provided are separated by a single slash (/). Square brackets ([ ]) taxonomic notes for other species. In addition, Stuke and add information on specimen condition and repository Skevington (2007) provided a key for several species in collection. Original descriptions and images were used to Costa Rica, although many of them are present in other diagnose the new species and to build the identification Neotropical countries. The hosts for many species are key. Distribution maps of the Physoconops species were poorly recorded and restricted to Megachile Latreille created with ArcGIS v.10.4.1 (ESRI 2017). bee species (Stuke, 2017; Stuke & Cardoso, 2013). Other acronyms of collections used were: AMNHN - The southernmost record for South America belongs American Museum of Natural History, New York, USA; to Physoconops rufipennis (Macquart), which has been SEMC - University of Kansas, Snow Entomological reported for the Río Negro Province in Argentina (Gibson Museum, Lawrence, USA; UZMC - University of et al., 2014). Chile is poor in species compared to Argentina Copenhagen, Zoological Museum, Copenhagen, Denmark. (Gibson et al., 2014; Stuke, 2017) and these have been The abbreviations used in this catalogue are: A: adult; recorded mainly in northern Chile (Kröber, 1915, 1927; cat.: catalog; desc.: description; distribution: geographic Stuardo, 1946). Only 3 species have been previously distribution; F: female; Fig(s).: figure(s); HT: holotype; mentioned: P. costatus (Fabricius), P. gracilis (Williston) References: references; ST: syntype; syn.: synonyms; T: and P. magnus (Williston) (Kröber, 1915, 1927; Reed, type. R.M. Barahona-Segovia et al. / Revista Mexicana de Biodiversidad 91 (2020): e913234 3 https://doi.org/10.22201/ib.20078706e.2020.91.3234 Results References: Kröber, 1915:137 (desc. & key); Kröber, 1927:140 (key); Stuardo, 1946:130 (cat.); Stuke, 2017:112 Conopidae Latreille, 1802 (cat.); Williston, 1885:377-378 (desc.). Conopinae Latreille, 1802 Material examined and distribution. Arica and Physoconops Szilady, 1926 Parinacota: mouth of the Lluta River, April-04-1924, Leg. Physoconops (Aconops) costatus (Fabricius, 1805), Fig. 1 H. Vasquez C. (UTA); Arica (Kröber, 1915) (Fig. 5). Conops costata Fabricius 1805: 175. Remarks Taxonomic summary The natural history of this species is unknown. Possibly, Type locality: America meridionali (T A UZMC). Chile is the most southern limit of its distribution. Host(s) Global distribution: Nearctic (USA) and Neotropical unknown. (Argentina, Brazil, Colombia, Paraguay, Venezuela and Chile). Physoconops (Pachyconops) magnus (Willinston, 1892), References: Fabricius, 1805:175 (desc.); Kröber, Figs. 6-8 1915:141 (desc. & key); Reed, 1888:301 (cat.); Stuke, Conops magnus Williston, 1892:43. 2017:109 (cat.). Material examined and distribution. No specimens Taxonomic summary were reviewed. Type locality: Chapada do Guimarães, Mato Grosso, Brazil (ST 6 F AMNHN). Remarks Global distribution: Neotropical (Brazil, Mexico and This species only appears mentioned in the catalogs Chile).
Recommended publications
  • Diptera): a Life History, Molecular, Morphological
    The evolutionary biotogy of Conopidae (Diptera): A life history, molecular, morphological, systematic, and taxonomic approach Joel Francis Gibson B.ScHon., University of Guelph, 1999 M.Sc, Iowa State University, 2002 B.Ed., Ontario Institute for Studies in Education/University of Toronto, 2003 A thesis submitted to the Faculty of Graduate and Postdoctoral Affairs in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Biology Carleton University Ottawa, Ontario © 2011 Joel Francis Gibson Library and Archives Bibliotheque et 1*1 Canada Archives Canada Published Heritage Direction du Branch Patrimoine de Pedition 395 Wellington Street 395, rue Wellington Ottawa ON K1A 0N4 Ottawa ON K1A 0N4 Canada Canada Your Tile Votre r&ference ISBN: 978-0-494-83217-2 Our file Notre reference ISBN: 978-0-494-83217-2 NOTICE: AVIS: The author has granted a non­ L'auteur a accorde une licence non exclusive exclusive license allowing Library and permettant a la Bibliotheque et Archives Archives Canada to reproduce, Canada de reproduire, publier, archiver, publish, archive, preserve, conserve, sauvegarder, conserver, transmettre au public communicate to the public by par telecommunication ou par I'lnternet, preter, telecommunication or on the Internet, distribuer et vendre des theses partout dans le loan, distribute and sell theses monde, a des fins commerciales ou autres, sur worldwide, for commercial or non­ support microforme, papier, electronique et/ou commercial purposes, in microform, autres formats. paper, electronic and/or any other formats. The author retains copyright L'auteur conserve la propriete du droit d'auteur ownership and moral rights in this et des droits moraux qui protege cette these.
    [Show full text]
  • Diptera: Conopidae: Myopinae) in Chile by Using Integrative Collection Methods
    Gayana 82(82(2),2): 2018156-159, 2018. ISSN 0717-652X Short communication New records and updated distribution of Myopa metallica Camras 1992 (Diptera: Conopidae: Myopinae) in Chile by using integrative collection methods Nuevos registros y distribución actualizada de Myopa metallica Camras 1992 (Diptera: Conopidae: Myopinae) en Chile usando métodos de colecta integrativa RODRIGO M. BARAHONA-SEGOVIA1,2,3*, LAURA PAÑINAO-MONSÁLVEZ2,4 & MATÍAS BARCELÓ2,5 1Laboratorio de Ecología de Ambientes Fragmentados (LEAF), Departamento de Ciencias Biológicas Animales, Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias y Pecuarias, Universidad de Chile, Santiago, Chile. 2Citizen Science program “Moscas Florícolas de Chile”, Chile. 3Centro de Estudios en Ecología Espacial y Medio Ambiente – Ecogeografía, Santiago, Chile. 4Facultad de Ciencias Forestales, Universidad de Concepción, Concepción, Chile. 5Laboratorio de Conservación Biológica, Departamento de Ciencias Ecológicas, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de Chile, Santiago, Chile. *E-mail: [email protected] ABSTRACT Myopa metallica Camras1992 is a parasitic fl y, endemic to Chile, whose distribution was unknown. In this study, four new localities are reported between the Atacama and Metropolitan regions using citizen science. Our work breaks down the methodological barriers, providing a distribution for a rare and conspicuous thick-headed fl y. RESÚMEN Myopa metallica Camras, 1992 es una mosca parásita, endémica de Chile, cuya distribución era desconocida. En este estudio se reportan cuatro nuevas localidades entre la región de Atacama y Metropolitana usando ciencia ciudadana. Nuestro trabajo rompe las barreras metodológicas, proporcionando una distriución para una especie de mosca conspicua y rara. Thick-headed fl ies (Diptera: Conopidae) are represented by Physoconops or Stylogaster (Skevington et al. 2010, 863 species distributed worldwide except for both Antarctica Stuke 2017).
    [Show full text]
  • The Conopid Flies of California (Diptera)
    Pbysocephala bwgessi (Williston). Courtesy E. S. Ross. 4 BULLETIN OF THE CALIFORNIA INSECT SURVEY VOLUME 6, NO. 2 THE CONOPID FLIES OF CALIFORNIA (DIPTERA) BY SIDNEY CAMRAS (Chicago, Illinois) and PAUL D. HURD, JR. (Department of Entomology and Parasitology, University of California, Berkeley) UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA PRESS BERKELEYANDLOSANGELES 1957 BULLETIN OF THE CALIFORNIA INSECT SURVEY Editors: E. G. Linsley, S. B. Freeborn, P. D. Hurd, R. L. Ushger Volume 6, No. 2, pp. 19-50, 4 figures in text, 25 maps, frontis. Submitted by Editors, October 26, 1956 Issued Sept. 3, 1957 Price, 75 cents & UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA PRESS BERKELEY AND LOS ANGELES CALIFORNIA CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY PRESS LONDON, ENGLAND PRINTED BY OFFSET IN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA THE CONOPID FLIES OF CALIFORNIA (Diptera) BY Sidney Camras and Paul D. Hurd, Jr. INTRODUCTION The conopid flies are characterized by the closed Zo~logy,Harvard College (M.C.Z.); California In- or narrowed first posterior cell of the wing (fig. 2) sect Survey, Department of Entomology and Para- and in all the Nearctic forms by the elongated sitology, University of California (C.I.S.); Mont A. proboscis. These flies, especially the members of Cazier, American Museum of Natural History the subfamily Conopinae which have the base of (A.M.N.H.); H. Dietrich, Department of Entomolcgy, the abdomen narrowed and somewhat thread-waisted, Cornell University (C.U.); H. J. Dybas, Chicago superficially resemble some of the wasps and cer- Museum of Natural History, (C.M.N.H.); G. F. fain asilids, bombyliids, syrphids, and tachinids. Knowlton, Utah State Agricultural College They ate found frequently around flowers.
    [Show full text]
  • Diptera, Conopidae) of Rumania
    ACTA FAUNISTICA ENTOMOLOGICA MUSE! NATIONALlS PRAGAE Vol. 13, N2 154 Edit. 30. VII. 1969 !Acta faun. ent. Mus. Nai. Pragae, 13: 191-204) A review of the Conopid- Flies (Diptera, Conopidae) of Rumania MILAN C H V A L A [ Pi'irodovedeckä fakulta Karlovy university, Pr aha) MEDEEA W E I N B E R G [Muzeul de Istorie Naturala "Gr. Antipa", Bucuresti] The present paper is based an extensive material of the family Cono­ pidae deposited in the collections of the Muzeul de Istarie Naturala "Gr. -mtipa", Bucuresti. We have found in the revised material altogether 39 species of this family collected on the whole territory of Rumania. We include also further 6 species which we did not find in the revised material but the occurrence of which in Rumania is known from the literature. At the present time 45 species of the family Conopidae are known on the territory of Rumania but not even this number is definite. Kröber (1936, 1939) records e. g. 57 species from Italy, 35 from Greece and 53 from France. Although the occurrence of conopid-flies is more frequent in warmer southern regions, in Czechoslovakia, where the family Conopidae has been studied very extensively [ Chväla, 1961, 1965), 52 species have been recorded and 8 other species are expected to be found here. The study and collecting of Conopidae especially in southern sandy regions of Rumania [ Bucuresti and Dobrogea Regions) will result without no doubt in the discovery of further interesting species. The first recmd on this family in Rumania was published by Frivaldszky [1876] who recorded 2 species - Zodion ctnereum Fabr.
    [Show full text]
  • Sovraccoperta Fauna Inglese Giusta, Page 1 @ Normalize
    Comitato Scientifico per la Fauna d’Italia CHECKLIST AND DISTRIBUTION OF THE ITALIAN FAUNA FAUNA THE ITALIAN AND DISTRIBUTION OF CHECKLIST 10,000 terrestrial and inland water species and inland water 10,000 terrestrial CHECKLIST AND DISTRIBUTION OF THE ITALIAN FAUNA 10,000 terrestrial and inland water species ISBNISBN 88-89230-09-688-89230- 09- 6 Ministero dell’Ambiente 9 778888988889 230091230091 e della Tutela del Territorio e del Mare CH © Copyright 2006 - Comune di Verona ISSN 0392-0097 ISBN 88-89230-09-6 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, without the prior permission in writing of the publishers and of the Authors. Direttore Responsabile Alessandra Aspes CHECKLIST AND DISTRIBUTION OF THE ITALIAN FAUNA 10,000 terrestrial and inland water species Memorie del Museo Civico di Storia Naturale di Verona - 2. Serie Sezione Scienze della Vita 17 - 2006 PROMOTING AGENCIES Italian Ministry for Environment and Territory and Sea, Nature Protection Directorate Civic Museum of Natural History of Verona Scientifi c Committee for the Fauna of Italy Calabria University, Department of Ecology EDITORIAL BOARD Aldo Cosentino Alessandro La Posta Augusto Vigna Taglianti Alessandra Aspes Leonardo Latella SCIENTIFIC BOARD Marco Bologna Pietro Brandmayr Eugenio Dupré Alessandro La Posta Leonardo Latella Alessandro Minelli Sandro Ruffo Fabio Stoch Augusto Vigna Taglianti Marzio Zapparoli EDITORS Sandro Ruffo Fabio Stoch DESIGN Riccardo Ricci LAYOUT Riccardo Ricci Zeno Guarienti EDITORIAL ASSISTANT Elisa Giacometti TRANSLATORS Maria Cristina Bruno (1-72, 239-307) Daniel Whitmore (73-238) VOLUME CITATION: Ruffo S., Stoch F.
    [Show full text]
  • Conopidae-Key-To-Bri
    Family Conopidae Source material This key is derived and updated from the work of Kenneth Smith (1969), Handbooks for the Identification of British Insects Volume 10, part 3(a). This is published by the Royal Entomological Society of London online at http://www.royensoc.co.uk/sites/default/files/Vol10_Part03a.pdf under a Creative Commons Licence. Line drawings are from this text. Check List (http://www.dipteristsforum.org.uk/sgb_check_browse.php?id=8682) Subfamily CONOPINAE Subfamily MYOPINAE Tribe Conopini Tribe Myopini CONOPS Linnaeus, 1758 MYOPA Fabricius, 1775 ceriaeformis Meigen, 1824 buccata Linnaeus, 1758 flavipes Linnaeus, 1758 fasciata Meigen, 1804 quadrifasciatus De Geer, 1776 hirsuta Stuke & Clements, 2008 strigatus Wiedemann, 1824 occulta Wiedemann, 1824 vesicularis Linnaeus, 1761 pellucida Robineau-Desvoidy, 1830 polystigma Rondani, 1857 LEOPOLDIUS Rondani, 1843 tessellatipennis Motschulsky, 1859 brevirostris Germar, 1827 testacea Linnaeus, 1767 signatus Wiedemann, 1824 vicaria Walker, 1849 Tribe Physocephalini THECOPHORA Rondani, 1845 PHYSOCEPHALA Schiner, 1861 atra Fabricius, 1775 nigra De Geer, 1776 fulvipes Robineau-Desvoidy, 1830 rufipes Fabricius, 1781 Tribe Sicini SICUS Scopoli, 1763 abdominalis Krober, 1915 ferrugineus Linnaeus, 1761 Tribe Zodionini ZODION Latreille, 1796 cinereum Fabricius, 1794 © Mike Hackston (2016). Updated and adapted from Smith (1969) Handbooks for the Identification of British Insects Volume 10, Part 3(a) Is my specimen in family Conopidae? Species in this family are fairly easily identified as such by having the following combination of factors: Wings with a distinct closed subapical cell (cell R5), red, which does not have a wing fold running through it. anal cell, green, extending at least half way to the margin of the wing Head and eyes of normal proportions for a fly Antennae either very long with several tiny segments at the tip or short with the third segment bearing a thickened bristle (arista) from the top surface © Mike Hackston (2016).
    [Show full text]
  • F. Christian Thompson Neal L. Evenhuis and Curtis W. Sabrosky Bibliography of the Family-Group Names of Diptera
    F. Christian Thompson Neal L. Evenhuis and Curtis W. Sabrosky Bibliography of the Family-Group Names of Diptera Bibliography Thompson, F. C, Evenhuis, N. L. & Sabrosky, C. W. The following bibliography gives full references to 2,982 works cited in the catalog as well as additional ones cited within the bibliography. A concerted effort was made to examine as many of the cited references as possible in order to ensure accurate citation of authorship, date, title, and pagination. References are listed alphabetically by author and chronologically for multiple articles with the same authorship. In cases where more than one article was published by an author(s) in a particular year, a suffix letter follows the year (letters are listed alphabetically according to publication chronology). Authors' names: Names of authors are cited in the bibliography the same as they are in the text for proper association of literature citations with entries in the catalog. Because of the differing treatments of names, especially those containing articles such as "de," "del," "van," "Le," etc., these names are cross-indexed in the bibliography under the various ways in which they may be treated elsewhere. For Russian and other names in Cyrillic and other non-Latin character sets, we follow the spelling used by the authors themselves. Dates of publication: Dating of these works was obtained through various methods in order to obtain as accurate a date of publication as possible for purposes of priority in nomenclature. Dates found in the original works or by outside evidence are placed in brackets after the literature citation.
    [Show full text]
  • Dipterists Digest Dipterists Digest
    1 Dipterists Digest Volume 26, No. 2 2019 First records of Helina pulchella (Ringdahl) (Diptera, Muscidae) from Finland and notes on the biology of the species Dipterists Digest JAAKKO POHJOISMÄKI and ANTTI HAARTO ………………………………. 111-115 Corrections and changes to the Diptera Checklist (42) EDITOR …………………………………………………………………………………... 116 Mechanisms and patterns of feeding in some leaf-mining larvae (Diptera, Agromyzidae, Drosophilidae and Anthomyiidae) GRAHAM E. ROTHERAY ........................................................................................ 117-137 Further records of Leopoldius calceatus (Rondani) (Diptera, Conopidae) in Britain DAVID K. CLEMENTS, CHRIS BENTLEY and PAUL KITCHENER ……….. 137-138 Effects of the 2018 heatwave on British hoverflies (Diptera, Syrphidae) ROGER K.A. MORRIS and STUART G. BALL …………………………………. 139-150 Further records of Chymomyza caudatula Oldenberg (Diptera, Drosophilidae) from England IVAN PERRY …………………………………………………………………………….. 150 Nematoproctus praesectus Loew (Diptera, Dolichopodidae) new to Britain, found together with N. distendens (Meigen), and notes on their habitat preferences C. MARTIN DRAKE ………………………………………………………………... 151-160 Changes to the Irish Diptera List (29) EDITOR …………………………………………………………………………………... 160 Hoverflies (Diptera, Syrphidae) visiting ivy Hedera species ROGER K.A. MORRIS and STUART G. BALL …………………………………... 161-167 continued inside back cover Published by 2019 Vol. 26 No. 2 ISSN 0953-7260 1 2 Zaphne caudata (Zetterstedt) (Diptera, Anthomyiidae) new to the East of England (V.Cs
    [Show full text]
  • Fly Times Issue 64
    FLY TIMES ISSUE 64, Spring, 2020 Stephen D. Gaimari, editor Plant Pest Diagnostics Branch California Department of Food & Agriculture 3294 Meadowview Road Sacramento, California 95832, USA Tel: (916) 738-6671 FAX: (916) 262-1190 Email: [email protected] Welcome to the latest issue of Fly Times! This issue is brought to you during the Covid-19 pandemic, with many of you likely cooped up at home, with insect collections worldwide closed for business! Perhaps for this reason this issue is pretty heavy, not just with articles but with images. There were many submissions to the Flies are Amazing! section and the Dipterists Lairs! I hope you enjoy them! Just to touch on an error I made in the Fall issue’s introduction… In outlining the change to “Spring” and “Fall” issues, instead of April and October issues, I said “But rest assured, I WILL NOT produce Fall issues after 20 December! Nor Spring issues after 20 March!” But of course I meant no Spring issues after 20 June! Instead of hitting the end of spring, I used the beginning. Oh well… Thank you to everyone for sending in such interesting articles! I encourage all of you to consider contributing articles that may be of interest to the Diptera community, or for larger manuscripts, the Fly Times Supplement series. Fly Times offers a great forum to report on research activities, to make specimen requests, to report interesting observations about flies or new and improved methods, to advertise opportunities for dipterists, to report on or announce meetings relevant to the community, etc., with all the digital images you wish to provide.
    [Show full text]
  • Zootaxa,The Conopidae of Costa Rica (Diptera)
    Zootaxa 1528: 1–40 (2007) ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) www.mapress.com/zootaxa/ ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2007 · Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) The Conopidae of Costa Rica (Diptera) (Part 1: Conopinae – Conopini &Tropidomyiini) JENS-HERMANN STUKE1 & JEFFREY H. SKEVINGTON2 1. Brunnenstraße 28, 26789 Leer, Germany; e-mail: [email protected]. 2. Invertebrate Biodiversity, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, 960 Carling Avenue, K.W. Neatby Building, Ottawa, Ontario, K1A 0C6, Canada; e-mail: [email protected]; web site: http://www.canacoll.org. Table of contents Abstract . 2 Introduction . 2 Materials & methods . 2 Results . 3 Conopini . 3 Conops subgenus Diconops Camras, 1957 . 3 Conops (Diconops) geminatus Camras (figures 1–4) . 3 Conops subgenus Sphenoconops Camras, 1955 . 4 Conops (Sphenoconops) nobilis (Walker) (figures 5–8) . 4 Physocephala Schiner, 1861 . 5 Physocephala bipunctata (Macquart) . 5 Physocephala carbonaria (Bigot) (figures 9–12) . 7 Physocephala cayennensis (Macquart) (figures 13–15) . 7 Physocephala herrerai spec. nov. (figures 16–21). 8 Physocephala inhabilis (Walker) (figures 22–25) . 10 Physocephala lugubris (Macquart) (figures 26–28). 12 Physocephala wulpi Camras (figures 29–32) . 12 Physoconops Szilady, 1926 s. str. 12 Physoconops subgenus Aconops Kröber, 1917 . 12 Physoconops (Aconops) longistylus (Kröber) . .12 Physoconops subgenus Gyroconops Camras, 1955 . 15 Physoconops (Gyroconops) ocellatus (Giglio-Tos) [status rev.] (figures 33–36, 38) . 15 Physoconops (Gyroconops) parvus (Williston) (figures 37, 39–42) . 16 Physoconops (Gyroconops) spec. 17 Physoconops (Physoconops) analis (Fabricius) (figures 43–46) . 19 Physoconops (Physoconops) anthreas (Williston) (figures 47–50) . 21 Physoconops (Physoconops) aureoscutellatus (Kröber) (figures 51–54) . 22 Physoconops (Physoconops) discalis (Williston) (figures 55–58) . 22 Physoconops (Physoconops) nigromarginatus (Kröber) (figures 59–62) .
    [Show full text]
  • An Introduction to the Immature Stages of British Flies
    Royal Entomological Society HANDBOOKS FOR THE IDENTIFICATION OF BRITISH INSECTS To purchase current handbooks and to download out-of-print parts visit: http://www.royensoc.co.uk/publications/index.htm This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 2.0 UK: England & Wales License. Copyright © Royal Entomological Society 2013 Handbooks for the Identification of British Insects Vol. 10, Part 14 AN INTRODUCTION TO THE IMMATURE STAGES OF BRITISH FLIES DIPTERA LARVAE, WITH NOTES ON EGGS, PUP ARIA AND PUPAE K. G. V. Smith ROYAL ENTOMOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF LONDON Handbooks for the Vol. 10, Part 14 Identification of British Insects Editors: W. R. Dolling & R. R. Askew AN INTRODUCTION TO THE IMMATURE STAGES OF BRITISH FLIES DIPTERA LARVAE, WITH NOTES ON EGGS, PUPARIA AND PUPAE By K. G. V. SMITH Department of Entomology British Museum (Natural History) London SW7 5BD 1989 ROYAL ENTOMOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF LONDON The aim of the Handbooks is to provide illustrated identification keys to the insects of Britain, together with concise morphological, biological and distributional information. Each handbook should serve both as an introduction to a particular group of insects and as an identification manual. Details of handbooks currently available can be obtained from Publications Sales, British Museum (Natural History), Cromwell Road, London SW7 5BD. Cover illustration: egg of Muscidae; larva (lateral) of Lonchaea (Lonchaeidae); floating puparium of Elgiva rufa (Panzer) (Sciomyzidae). To Vera, my wife, with thanks for sharing my interest in insects World List abbreviation: Handbk /dent. Br./nsects. © Royal Entomological Society of London, 1989 First published 1989 by the British Museum (Natural History), Cromwell Road, London SW7 5BD.
    [Show full text]
  • Conopidae (Thick-Headed Flies) 62
    CONOPIDAE (THICK-HEADED FLIES) 62 Jeffrey H. Skevington, E Christian Thompson, and Sidney Camras 1 Stylogaster Q 2 Physoconops Q Figs. 62.1-2. Females of (I) Stylogaster stylosus Townsend, (Skevington & Oang, 2002, fig. 6) and (2) Physoconops brachyrhynchus (Macquart), (Nearctic, MNO, fig . 54. 1). 847 848 MANUAL OF CENTRAL AMERICAN DIPTERA - VOLUME 2 Diagnosis of orthopteroids, specifically of cockroaches and crickets (Smith & Cunningham-van Someren, 1985; Woodley & Small to large (body length 2.5- 30.0 mm) flies (Figs. 1- 2). Judd, 1998). Relatively bare and elongate, usually tomentose and colored Most conopid flies are found at flowers, where mating black and yellow, reddish-brown or blackish, often with takes place and, in many cases, females find suitable hosts in striking resemblance to their common hosts, wasps and bees. which to lay their eggs. Females attack their hosts by insert­ Head large, broader than thorax, with bare eyes, dichoptic in ing their eggs into the dorsum of the abdomen. The larvae both sexes; proboscis usually long and slender, frequently develop first by feeding on haemolymph, and in their last two or more times longer than head, singly or doubly genicu­ instar attack the tissue of the thorax, weakening and then late; pal pus one-segmented or absent. Antenna usually long, killing the host. Pupation takes place in the abdomen. Most with pedicel generally longer than scape, flagellum with conopids are not host specific and will strike a variety of short, thick apical stylus (Conopinae) or dorsal arista. Ocelli aculeate hymenopterans (Smith, 1966). With the exception usually absent in Conopinae, present in other subfamilies.
    [Show full text]