Diptera): a Life History, Molecular, Morphological

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Diptera): a Life History, Molecular, Morphological The evolutionary biotogy of Conopidae (Diptera): A life history, molecular, morphological, systematic, and taxonomic approach Joel Francis Gibson B.ScHon., University of Guelph, 1999 M.Sc, Iowa State University, 2002 B.Ed., Ontario Institute for Studies in Education/University of Toronto, 2003 A thesis submitted to the Faculty of Graduate and Postdoctoral Affairs in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Biology Carleton University Ottawa, Ontario © 2011 Joel Francis Gibson Library and Archives Bibliotheque et 1*1 Canada Archives Canada Published Heritage Direction du Branch Patrimoine de Pedition 395 Wellington Street 395, rue Wellington Ottawa ON K1A 0N4 Ottawa ON K1A 0N4 Canada Canada Your Tile Votre r&ference ISBN: 978-0-494-83217-2 Our file Notre reference ISBN: 978-0-494-83217-2 NOTICE: AVIS: The author has granted a non­ L'auteur a accorde une licence non exclusive exclusive license allowing Library and permettant a la Bibliotheque et Archives Archives Canada to reproduce, Canada de reproduire, publier, archiver, publish, archive, preserve, conserve, sauvegarder, conserver, transmettre au public communicate to the public by par telecommunication ou par I'lnternet, preter, telecommunication or on the Internet, distribuer et vendre des theses partout dans le loan, distribute and sell theses monde, a des fins commerciales ou autres, sur worldwide, for commercial or non­ support microforme, papier, electronique et/ou commercial purposes, in microform, autres formats. paper, electronic and/or any other formats. The author retains copyright L'auteur conserve la propriete du droit d'auteur ownership and moral rights in this et des droits moraux qui protege cette these. Ni thesis. Neither the thesis nor la these ni des extra its substantiels de celle-ci substantial extracts from it may be ne doivent etre imprimes ou autrement printed or otherwise reproduced reproduits sans son autorisation. without the author's permission. In compliance with the Canadian Conformement a la loi canadienne sur la Privacy Act some supporting forms protection de la vie privee, quelques may have been removed from this formulaires secondaires ont ete enleves de thesis. cette these. While these forms may be included Bien que ces formulaires aient inclus dans in the document page count, their la pagination, il n'y aura aucun contenu removal does not represent any loss manquant. of content from the thesis. 1+1 Canada Little fly, Thy summer's play My thoughtless hand Has brushed away. Am not I A fly like thee? Or art not thou A man like me? For I dance And drink and sing, Till some blind hand Shall brush my wing. If thought is life And strength and breath, And the want Of thought is death, Then am I A happy fly, If I live, Or if I die. William Blake (1757-1827) Abstract Conopidae is a fascinating family commonly referred to as thick-headed flies. Over 800 species, in over 50 genera and subgenera have been described, but little phylogenetic work has been completed. Past theories on life history, conopid-host interactions, mating strategies, family placement, phylogeny, and classification have been based on very little data and analysis. Based on field observation and collections analysis, evidence of hilltopping mating behaviour is confirmed for thirteen species of Conopidae in the vicinity of Ottawa, Ontario. This represents only the second ever record of this behaviour amongst species of Conopidae. DNA sequence data from ten gene regions is used in a phylogenetic analysis often species of Conopidae and representatives of seventeen other families of Diptera. Parsimony and Bayesian analyses are used to propose a phylogenetic hypothesis that places Conopidae within Schizophora as adelphotaxon to Lauxaniidae. Also, a comparison of the informative qualities of mitochondrial versus nuclear DNA sequence data and ribosomal versus protein coding DNA sequence data is included. Further DNA sequence data from five gene regions and over fifty species of Conopidae are combined with morphological data. A cladogram recovered via parsimony analysis confirms the monophyly of five subfamilies within Conopidae. Relationships between subfamilies are also determined with morphological autapomorphies proposed for all nodes in the cladogram. A phylogenetic analysis including only morphological data for all world genera of Conopidae is completed. The recovered iii cladogram includes six monophyletic subfamilies, two monophyletic tribes within Myopinae, and eleven monophyletic tribes within Conopinae. This phylogenetic hypothesis is used as the basis of a new classification of the genera of Conopidae. Chrysidiomyia Smith, 1989 is placed as a junior synonym of Callosiconops Krober, 1940a, stat. rev. A new genus, Schedophysoconops gen. nov., and subgenus, Asiconops (Aegloconops) subgen. nov., are described. The evolution of body structures within the family is discussed. Biogeographic patterns within subfamilies are noted. The first ever key to world genera of Conopidae is included. IV Acknowledgements Funding was supplied by an NSERC Postgraduate Scholarship, an Ontario Graduate Scholarship, an Entomological Society of Canada Graduate Research- Travel Scholarship, a Biological Survey of Canada Scholarship, a Dipterology Fund Student Research and Travel Grant, a Willi Hennig Society Marie Stopes Travel Award, Carleton University Faculty of Graduate Studies and Research Travel Bursaries, and a Carleton University Biology Department Graduate Scholarship. Funding and equipment were also supplied by J.H. Skevington from his Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada Research budget, an NSERC Discovery Grant, and an NSF grant to B. Wiegmann (FLYTREE AToL, EF-0334948). Funding and travel costs were also supplied by S.B. Peck from his NSERC Discovery Grant. My thanks go to Dr. Skevington and Prof. Peck for not only funding my research, but also for providing insight and guidance. Thanks as well to Prof. F. Chapleau, the other member of my advisory committee, who likewise provided insight at important stages of my research. I was extremely fortunate to be able to meet and consult with Dr. Sidney Camras of the Field Museum of Natural History in Chicago, IL. I am grateful for the chance to work with and gain direct insight from one of the true fathers of conopidology. I also had the opportunity to collaborate with M. Mei and F.C. Thompson, two other eminent scientists investigating Conopidae. Thanks to M. Mei, M. Irwin, S. Winterton, S. Gillespie, N. Cordes, M. Hauser, K. Bayless, M. Locke, J. Cumming, S. Cumming, H. Cumming, S. Brooks, J. Corrigan, M. v Foldvari, M. Jackson, C. Kehlmaier, 0. Lonsdale, J. O'Hara, S. Marshall, M. Pollet, T. Wheeler, S. Gaimari, J. Savage, and B. Sinclair for providing specimens and/or identifications. Thanks, as well, to my contacts at all insect collections that facilitated visits and/or loans of materials. C. Lewis provided assistance with programming MrBayes. M. Sorenson provided assistance with determining branch supports for trees. Portions of this thesis, as submitted for publication, were improved based on editorial input from G. Capretta, J. O'Hara, A. Vogler, S. Gaimari, and S. Cameron, as well as numerous anonymous reviewers. Special thanks go to my molecular lab colleagues. M. Jackson, J. Kits, G.F.G. Miranda, and W. Knee. Their words of caution, innovation, and sympathy were much appreciated during long hours of pipetting, aligning, and analyzing. The utmost appreciation is extended to S. Kelso, the guru and mentor of the molecular lab, without whom no sequence is possible. Special thanks as well are extended to colleagues in the Canadian National Collection of Insects, Arachnids, and Nematodes. M. Locke, S. Brooks, B. Sinclair, 0. Lonsdale, J. O'Hara, P. Bouchard, J. Cumming, and G. Gibson all provided valuable insight into all matters taxonomic, morphological, editorial, phylogenetic, and budgetary. Finally, and most importantly, my thanks are extended to my family. My parents, Frank and Marina, and my brothers, Ben and Will, offered constant encouragement and support. My daughters, Anabel and Elsa, provided the most essential part of this project: unfiltered joy and love. My wife, Gina, supplied unending support, patience, insight, inspiration, and love. No mere words could ever express my eternal gratitude. vi Table of Contents List of tables ix List of figures x Preface xiv 1. Introduction to Conopidae 1.1. The use of Conopidae in biological research 1 1.2. Previous systematic research on Conopidae 4 1.3. Molecular and morphological methodology employed 6 1.4. Organization of thesis 10 2. Hilltopping in species of Conopidae in the Ottawa area 2.1. Introduction 12 2.2. Materials and methods 13 2.3. Results 14 2.4. Discussion 16 3. Placement of Conopidae (Diptera) within Schizophora based on mtDNA and nrDNA gene regions 3.1. Introduction 19 3.2. Materials and methods 23 3.3. Results 27 3.4. Discussion 33 vii 4. Phylogenetic analysis of relationships between genera of Conopidae based on molecular and morphological data 4.1. Introduction 43 4.2. Materials and methods 45 4.3. Results 73 4.4. Discussion 79 5. Revision of the genera of Conopidae based on morphological data 5.1. Introduction 99 5.2. Materials and methods 103 5.3. Results 128 5.4. Discussion 137 5.5. Key to world genera of Conopidae 178 6. General conclusion 197 General bibliography 203 Tables 246 Figures 283 Vlll List of tables Table 2.1. Specimens of Conopidae (Diptera) from the CNC collected in the Ottawa area, noting those collected on hilltops 246 Table 3.1. List of taxa included in Chapter 3 analysis with GenBank accession numbers 247 Table 3.2. Primer oligonucleotides used for PCR amplification of selected gene segments in Chapter 3 249 Table 3.3. Summary of results for individual and concatenated gene partitions 250 Table 4.1. List of taxa included in Chapter 4 analysis with GenBank accession numbers 252 Table 4.2. Primer oligonucleotides used for PCR amplification of selected gene segments in Chapter 4 255 Table 4.3.
Recommended publications
  • Dipterists Forum
    BULLETIN OF THE Dipterists Forum Bulletin No. 76 Autumn 2013 Affiliated to the British Entomological and Natural History Society Bulletin No. 76 Autumn 2013 ISSN 1358-5029 Editorial panel Bulletin Editor Darwyn Sumner Assistant Editor Judy Webb Dipterists Forum Officers Chairman Martin Drake Vice Chairman Stuart Ball Secretary John Kramer Meetings Treasurer Howard Bentley Please use the Booking Form included in this Bulletin or downloaded from our Membership Sec. John Showers website Field Meetings Sec. Roger Morris Field Meetings Indoor Meetings Sec. Duncan Sivell Roger Morris 7 Vine Street, Stamford, Lincolnshire PE9 1QE Publicity Officer Erica McAlister [email protected] Conservation Officer Rob Wolton Workshops & Indoor Meetings Organiser Duncan Sivell Ordinary Members Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London, SW7 5BD [email protected] Chris Spilling, Malcolm Smart, Mick Parker Nathan Medd, John Ismay, vacancy Bulletin contributions Unelected Members Please refer to guide notes in this Bulletin for details of how to contribute and send your material to both of the following: Dipterists Digest Editor Peter Chandler Dipterists Bulletin Editor Darwyn Sumner Secretary 122, Link Road, Anstey, Charnwood, Leicestershire LE7 7BX. John Kramer Tel. 0116 212 5075 31 Ash Tree Road, Oadby, Leicester, Leicestershire, LE2 5TE. [email protected] [email protected] Assistant Editor Treasurer Judy Webb Howard Bentley 2 Dorchester Court, Blenheim Road, Kidlington, Oxon. OX5 2JT. 37, Biddenden Close, Bearsted, Maidstone, Kent. ME15 8JP Tel. 01865 377487 Tel. 01622 739452 [email protected] [email protected] Conservation Dipterists Digest contributions Robert Wolton Locks Park Farm, Hatherleigh, Oakhampton, Devon EX20 3LZ Dipterists Digest Editor Tel.
    [Show full text]
  • Superfamilies Tephritoidea and Sciomyzoidea (Dip- Tera: Brachycera) Kaj Winqvist & Jere Kahanpää
    20 © Sahlbergia Vol. 12: 20–32, 2007 Checklist of Finnish flies: superfamilies Tephritoidea and Sciomyzoidea (Dip- tera: Brachycera) Kaj Winqvist & Jere Kahanpää Winqvist, K. & Kahanpää, J. 2007: Checklist of Finnish flies: superfamilies Tephritoidea and Sciomyzoidea (Diptera: Brachycera). — Sahlbergia 12:20-32, Helsinki, Finland, ISSN 1237-3273. Another part of the updated checklist of Finnish flies is presented. This part covers the families Lonchaeidae, Pallopteridae, Piophilidae, Platystomatidae, Tephritidae, Ulididae, Coelopidae, Dryomyzidae, Heterocheilidae, Phaeomyii- dae, Sciomyzidae and Sepsidae. Eight species are recorded from Finland for the first time. The following ten species have been erroneously reported from Finland and are here deleted from the Finnish checklist: Chaetolonchaea das- yops (Meigen, 1826), Earomyia crystallophila (Becker, 1895), Lonchaea hirti- ceps Zetterstedt, 1837, Lonchaea laticornis Meigen, 1826, Prochyliza lundbecki (Duda, 1924), Campiglossa achyrophori (Loew, 1869), Campiglossa irrorata (Fallén, 1814), Campiglossa tessellata (Loew, 1844), Dioxyna sororcula (Wie- demann, 1830) and Tephritis nigricauda (Loew, 1856). The Finnish records of Lonchaeidae: Lonchaea bruggeri Morge, Lonchaea contigua Collin, Lonchaea difficilis Hackman and Piophilidae: Allopiophila dudai (Frey) are considered dubious. The total number of species of Tephritoidea and Sciomyzoidea found from Finland is now 262. Kaj Winqvist, Zoological Museum, University of Turku, FI-20014 Turku, Finland. Email: [email protected] Jere Kahanpää, Finnish Environment Institute, P.O. Box 140, FI-00251 Helsinki, Finland. Email: kahanpaa@iki.fi Introduction new millennium there was no concentrated The last complete checklist of Finnish Dipte- Finnish effort to study just these particular ra was published in Hackman (1980a, 1980b). groups. Consequently, before our work the Recent checklists of Finnish species have level of knowledge on Finnish fauna in these been published for ‘lower Brachycera’ i.e.
    [Show full text]
  • Conops Quadrifasciatus Geer 1776 – Species Registered in 2016 in the Republic of Moldova
    Sustainable use, protection of animal world and forest 172 management in the context of climate change CONOPS QUADRIFASCIATUS GEER 1776 – SPECIES REGISTERED IN 2016 IN THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA Asea M. Timus Institute of Zoology, Academy of Sciences of Moldova, Chişinau, e-mal: [email protected] In spring of 2016the Conops quadrifasciatus De Geer, 1776 species (Diptera, Conopidae) was recorded in the Republic of Moldova. The specimens of this spe- cies were observed in 03.IV.2016 on the plants from campus of SAUM. The species is aentomological curiosity, because imago presents phenomenon of the mimicrism and is very similar to wasps. For the first time in native literature, the species was mentions in “Animal world. Insects. 1983”: “Species widespread in the USSR, Eastern Europe and Asia Minor is “bolishegolovka 4-h polosnaia” C.quadrifasciatus”. According to the passage it goes without saying that, the species is widespread in the Republic of Moldova too. Other sources indicated that the species spreads from Europe to Siberia, and most often in Central Europe. According to the database of the Fauna Europaea, this species is re- corded in the following countries: Andorra, Austria, Belgium, Britain, Czech Repub- lic, Denmark, Finland, Switzerland, France, Germany, Hungary, Ireland, Italy, Lithua- nia, Luxembourg, Poland, Slovakia and Sweden. For Moldova is indicated as – absent, but for neighbouring states as follows: Romania – present and Ukraine – absent. Description. The adult has 10-15 mm body length, and due to long legs has a great look insect. The dominant color is dark brown (Fig. 1). The head is large, dark brown and with long spindly antennae.
    [Show full text]
  • Revista Mexicana De Biodiversidad
    Revista Mexicana de Biodiversidad Revista Mexicana de Biodiversidad 91 (2020): e913234 Taxonomy and systematics The species of the genus Physoconops (Diptera: Conopidae) from Chile, with the description of a new species Las especies del género Physoconops (Diptera: Conopidae) de Chile, con la descripción de una especie nueva Rodrigo M. Barahona-Segovia a, b, *, Vicente Valdés-Guzmánb, Laura Pañinao-Monsálvez b, c a Departamento de Ciencias Biológicas y Biodiversidad, Universidad de Los Lagos, Av. Fuschlöcher 1305, 5290000 Osorno, Chile b Citizen Science Program Moscas Florícolas de Chile, Pje. Arizona 4067a, 8420000 Santiago, Chile c Facultad de Ciencias Forestales, Universidad de Concepción, Victoria 500, 4030000 Concepción, Chile *Corresponding author: [email protected] (R.M. Barahona-Segovia) Received: 4 October 2019; accepted: 26 February 2020 http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:98BCC05E-4587-494C-B033-324CAB051B47 Abstract Thick-headed flies (Conopidae) are a family of Diptera with species that are endoparasitoids of bees and aculeate wasps. Physoconops is represented by 64 species in the Neotropical and Andean regions and distributed in many countries. Only 3 species have been described for Chile, specifically from the northern area. In this work, a new species from the Valdivian evergreen forest, Physoconops tentenvilu n. sp., is described and a new key for the Chilean species is provided. In addition, P. tentevilu represents the southernmost record of this genus in Chile. Morphological aspects are discussed, as well as hosts and distribution gaps for the Chilean Physoconops species. Keywords: Bee host; Hotspot; Mapuche myth; Megachile; Valdivian evergreen forest Resumen Las moscas de cabeza ancha (Conopidae) son una familia de Diptera cuyas especies son parasitoides de abejas y avispas.
    [Show full text]
  • ROBBER-FLIES and EMPIDS ROBBER-FLIES Asilidae. Very
    ROBBER-FLIES and EMPIDS Asilus ROBBER-FLIES Asilidae. Very bristly predatory flies that head from front generally chase and catch other insects in mid-air. Most species sit in wait and dart out when likely prey appears. The prey is then sucked dry with the stout proboscis, which projects horizontally or obliquely forward. There is a deep groove between the eyes in both sexes, the eyes never touching even in males. A 'beard' on the face protects eyes from struggling prey. Legs are sturdy and have 2 pads at most. Wings folded flat over body at rest. Larvae eat some dead vegetable matter, but most are at least partly predatory and some feed mainly on beetle and fly grubs in the soil. Asilus with prey As Asi/us crabroniformis. An unmistakable fly - one of the largest in B - inhabiting open country 7-10. A very strong flier. Breeds in cow pats and other dung. Dasypogon diadema. First 2 long veins both reach wing margin: wing membrane ribbed. Front tibia has curved spine at tip. Male more uniformly black, with dark wings. 6-8 in scrubby places, especially coastal dunes. S. ;., Leptogaster cylindrica. Feet without pads. Hind femur yellow. 3rd antennal segment ends in bristle. One of the slimmest robber-flies, it resembles a crane-fly in flight. It hunts in grassy places, flying slowly and plucking aphids from the grasses. 5-8. A L. guttiventris is similar but has reddish hind femur. 85 Dioctria atricapi/la. First 2 long veins reach margin. Beard rather sparse and, as in all Oioctria species, the antennae spring from a prominence high on the head.
    [Show full text]
  • Diptera: Psilidae)
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ENTOMOLOGYENTOMOLOGY ISSN (online): 1802-8829 Eur. J. Entomol. 113: 393–396, 2016 http://www.eje.cz doi: 10.14411/eje.2016.050 NOTE Infestation of the mycoheterotrophic orchid Yoania japonica by the two-winged fl y, Chyliza vittata (Diptera: Psilidae) KENJI SUETSUGU Department of Biology, Graduate School of Science, Kobe University, 1-1 Rokkodai, Nada-ku, Kobe, 657-8501, Japan; e-mail: [email protected] Key words. Diptera, Psilidae, Chyliza vittata, host plants, mycoheterotrophy, Orchidaceae, Yoania japonica, Gastrodia elata, phytophagous insects, stem-miner Abstract. Chyliza vittata is known to utilize leaves, stems and underground parts of several leafy and leafl ess orchids. Compared to the well-recorded feeding habits of C. vittata in Europe, its feeding habits in Japan are poorly studied. Thus, further records of its host plants and the habits of its larvae in Japan are likely to reveal the similarities and differences in its feeding habits in Europe and Japan. The current study reports C. vittata feeding on the stems of the mycoheterotrophic orchid Yoania japonica in central Japan. This study also showed that in spite of the small size of Yoania its reproductive success is not severely reduced when infested with C. vittata, whereas the robust stems of Gastrodia elata, which is its main host plant in Japan, are thought to be a defence against infestation by C. vittata. INTRODUCTION fl oribunda (Caprifoliaceae; Sugiura & Yamazaki, 2006; Yamaza- The Psilidae is a small family of acalyptrate Diptera in the su- ki & Sugiura, 2008), while C. vittata consumes the leaves, stems perfamily Diopsoidea, which includes about 400 described spe- and underground structures of several orchid genera, including cies (Freidberg & Shatalkin, 2008).
    [Show full text]
  • ARTHROPODA Subphylum Hexapoda Protura, Springtails, Diplura, and Insects
    NINE Phylum ARTHROPODA SUBPHYLUM HEXAPODA Protura, springtails, Diplura, and insects ROD P. MACFARLANE, PETER A. MADDISON, IAN G. ANDREW, JOCELYN A. BERRY, PETER M. JOHNS, ROBERT J. B. HOARE, MARIE-CLAUDE LARIVIÈRE, PENELOPE GREENSLADE, ROSA C. HENDERSON, COURTenaY N. SMITHERS, RicarDO L. PALMA, JOHN B. WARD, ROBERT L. C. PILGRIM, DaVID R. TOWNS, IAN McLELLAN, DAVID A. J. TEULON, TERRY R. HITCHINGS, VICTOR F. EASTOP, NICHOLAS A. MARTIN, MURRAY J. FLETCHER, MARLON A. W. STUFKENS, PAMELA J. DALE, Daniel BURCKHARDT, THOMAS R. BUCKLEY, STEVEN A. TREWICK defining feature of the Hexapoda, as the name suggests, is six legs. Also, the body comprises a head, thorax, and abdomen. The number A of abdominal segments varies, however; there are only six in the Collembola (springtails), 9–12 in the Protura, and 10 in the Diplura, whereas in all other hexapods there are strictly 11. Insects are now regarded as comprising only those hexapods with 11 abdominal segments. Whereas crustaceans are the dominant group of arthropods in the sea, hexapods prevail on land, in numbers and biomass. Altogether, the Hexapoda constitutes the most diverse group of animals – the estimated number of described species worldwide is just over 900,000, with the beetles (order Coleoptera) comprising more than a third of these. Today, the Hexapoda is considered to contain four classes – the Insecta, and the Protura, Collembola, and Diplura. The latter three classes were formerly allied with the insect orders Archaeognatha (jumping bristletails) and Thysanura (silverfish) as the insect subclass Apterygota (‘wingless’). The Apterygota is now regarded as an artificial assemblage (Bitsch & Bitsch 2000).
    [Show full text]
  • Flies) Benjamin Kongyeli Badii
    Chapter Phylogeny and Functional Morphology of Diptera (Flies) Benjamin Kongyeli Badii Abstract The order Diptera includes all true flies. Members of this order are the most ecologically diverse and probably have a greater economic impact on humans than any other group of insects. The application of explicit methods of phylogenetic and morphological analysis has revealed weaknesses in the traditional classification of dipteran insects, but little progress has been made to achieve a robust, stable clas- sification that reflects evolutionary relationships and morphological adaptations for a more precise understanding of their developmental biology and behavioral ecol- ogy. The current status of Diptera phylogenetics is reviewed in this chapter. Also, key aspects of the morphology of the different life stages of the flies, particularly characters useful for taxonomic purposes and for an understanding of the group’s biology have been described with an emphasis on newer contributions and progress in understanding this important group of insects. Keywords: Tephritoidea, Diptera flies, Nematocera, Brachycera metamorphosis, larva 1. Introduction Phylogeny refers to the evolutionary history of a taxonomic group of organisms. Phylogeny is essential in understanding the biodiversity, genetics, evolution, and ecology among groups of organisms [1, 2]. Functional morphology involves the study of the relationships between the structure of an organism and the function of the various parts of an organism. The old adage “form follows function” is a guiding principle of functional morphology. It helps in understanding the ways in which body structures can be used to produce a wide variety of different behaviors, including moving, feeding, fighting, and reproducing. It thus, integrates concepts from physiology, evolution, anatomy and development, and synthesizes the diverse ways that biological and physical factors interact in the lives of organisms [3].
    [Show full text]
  • Diptera: Oestroidea) Magdi S
    El-Hawagry Egyptian Journal of Biological Pest Control (2018) 28:46 Egyptian Journal of https://doi.org/10.1186/s41938-018-0042-3 Biological Pest Control RESEARCH Open Access Catalogue of the Tachinidae of Egypt (Diptera: Oestroidea) Magdi S. El-Hawagry Abstract Tachinid flies are an important group of parasitoids in their larval stage, and all their hosts are of the Arthropoda, almost exclusively other insects, including important insect pests in agriculture and forestry. All known Egyptian taxa of the family Tachinidae are systematically catalogued. Synonymies, type localities, type depositories, world distributions by biogeographic realm(s) and country, Egyptian localities, and dates of collection are provided. A total of 72 tachinid species belonging to 42 genera, 15 tribes, and 4 subfamilies has been treated. Keywords: Tachinid flies, Egyptian taxa, World distribution, Egyptian localities, Dates of collection Background agriculture and forestry. They typically parasitize phytopha- Tachinidae are a large and cosmopolitan family of flies gous larvae of Lepidoptera and Coleoptera or nymphs of within the superfamily Oestroidea. It is the second largest Hemiptera and Orthoptera. Consequently, tachinid flies family in the order Diptera (Irwin et al. 2003), with some have been successfully applied in programs of biological 1500 recognized genera (O’Hara 2016) and more than control against different insect pests (Stireman et al. 2006; 8500 described species (O’Hara 2013) worldwide. How- O’Hara 2008 and Cerretti and Tschorsnig 2010). ever, the estimated true diversity of the family is probably No comprehensive taxonomic studies on the family double the number of the currently known species, mak- Tachinidae have been carried out in Egypt before.
    [Show full text]
  • Tephritid Flies Recording Scheme June 2020
    TEPHRITID FLIES RECORDING SCHEME JUNE 2020 Since the last note (Bulletin of the Dipterists Forum 84: pp. 8-10), based on data from England, Wales and Scotland, the British Tephritidae Recording Scheme database has continued to grow and a further summary is provided for records ascertained to the end of 2019. COVERAGE 1878 hectads throughout the region. 2 Number of species 1 - 5 6 - 10 11 - 15 1 16 - 20 21 - 25 26 - 30 31 - 35 36 - 40 0 41 - 45 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 DATA For the majority of species the data are presented as the total number of hectads from all date classes (pre 1920 or date unknown, 1920-1939, 1940-1959, 1960-1979, 1980-1999 and 2000-2019) with the numbers in brackets showing ‘new’ hectads during the respective periods. Dithryca guttularis (Meigen, 1826). 178, 21, 10 (10), 2 (2), 11 (10), 93 (85), 71 (50). Myopites eximius Séguy, 1932. 45, 3, 3 (3), 2 (1), 1 (0), 22 (18), 36 (20). Myopites inulaedyssentericae Blot, 1827. 126, 5, 4 (4), 3 (2), 2 (2), 60 (53), 97 (60). Urophora cardui (Linnaeus, 1758). 485, 25, 17 (10), 15 (7), 26 (19), 254 (217), 382 (207). Urophora cuspidata (Meigen, 1826). 40, 0, 2 (2), 2 (2), 3 (2), 19 (18), 22 (16). Urophora jaceana (Hering, 1935). 698, 43, 22 (17), 14 (9), 50 (47), 362 (325), 397 (257). Urophora quadrifasciata (Meigen, 1826). 294, 12, 15 (10), 13 (8), 5 (3), 115 (107), 219 (154). Urophora solstitialis (Linnaeus, 1758).
    [Show full text]
  • Diptera: Conopidae: Myopinae) in Chile by Using Integrative Collection Methods
    Gayana 82(82(2),2): 2018156-159, 2018. ISSN 0717-652X Short communication New records and updated distribution of Myopa metallica Camras 1992 (Diptera: Conopidae: Myopinae) in Chile by using integrative collection methods Nuevos registros y distribución actualizada de Myopa metallica Camras 1992 (Diptera: Conopidae: Myopinae) en Chile usando métodos de colecta integrativa RODRIGO M. BARAHONA-SEGOVIA1,2,3*, LAURA PAÑINAO-MONSÁLVEZ2,4 & MATÍAS BARCELÓ2,5 1Laboratorio de Ecología de Ambientes Fragmentados (LEAF), Departamento de Ciencias Biológicas Animales, Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias y Pecuarias, Universidad de Chile, Santiago, Chile. 2Citizen Science program “Moscas Florícolas de Chile”, Chile. 3Centro de Estudios en Ecología Espacial y Medio Ambiente – Ecogeografía, Santiago, Chile. 4Facultad de Ciencias Forestales, Universidad de Concepción, Concepción, Chile. 5Laboratorio de Conservación Biológica, Departamento de Ciencias Ecológicas, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de Chile, Santiago, Chile. *E-mail: [email protected] ABSTRACT Myopa metallica Camras1992 is a parasitic fl y, endemic to Chile, whose distribution was unknown. In this study, four new localities are reported between the Atacama and Metropolitan regions using citizen science. Our work breaks down the methodological barriers, providing a distribution for a rare and conspicuous thick-headed fl y. RESÚMEN Myopa metallica Camras, 1992 es una mosca parásita, endémica de Chile, cuya distribución era desconocida. En este estudio se reportan cuatro nuevas localidades entre la región de Atacama y Metropolitana usando ciencia ciudadana. Nuestro trabajo rompe las barreras metodológicas, proporcionando una distriución para una especie de mosca conspicua y rara. Thick-headed fl ies (Diptera: Conopidae) are represented by Physoconops or Stylogaster (Skevington et al. 2010, 863 species distributed worldwide except for both Antarctica Stuke 2017).
    [Show full text]
  • De Novo Transcriptome Identifies Olfactory Genes in Diachasmimorpha Longicaudata
    G C A T T A C G G C A T genes Article De Novo Transcriptome Identifies Olfactory Genes in Diachasmimorpha longicaudata (Ashmead) 1, 2, 2 2 3,4, 5, Liangde Tang y, Jimin Liu y, Lihui Liu , Yonghao Yu , Haiyan Zhao * and Wen Lu * 1 Key Laboratory of Integrated Pest Management on Tropical Crops, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Environment and Plant Protection Institute, Chinese Academy of Tropical Agricultural Sciences, Haikou 571101, China; [email protected] 2 Guangxi Key Laboratory for Biology of Crop Diseases and Insect Pests, Institute of Plant Protection, Guangxi Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Nanning 530007, China; [email protected] (J.L.); [email protected] (L.L.); [email protected] (Y.Y.) 3 Department of Entomology, College of Tobacco Science, Guizhou University, Guiyang 550025, China 4 Guangxi Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Nanning 530007, China 5 College of Agriculture, Guangxi University, Nanning 530007, China * Correspondence: [email protected] (H.Z.); [email protected] (W.L.) Authors contribute equally. y Received: 3 January 2020; Accepted: 22 January 2020; Published: 29 January 2020 Abstract: Diachasmimoorpha longicaudata (Ashmead, D. longicaudata) (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) is a solitary species of parasitoid wasp and widely used in integrated pest management (IPM) programs as a biological control agent in order to suppress tephritid fruit flies of economic importance. Although many studies have investigated the behaviors in the detection of their hosts, little is known of the molecular information of their chemosensory system. We assembled the first transcriptome of D. longgicaudata using transcriptome sequencing and identified 162,621 unigenes for the Ashmead insects in response to fruit flies fed with different fruits (guava, mango, and carambola).
    [Show full text]