Superfamilies Tephritoidea and Sciomyzoidea (Dip- Tera: Brachycera) Kaj Winqvist & Jere Kahanpää

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Superfamilies Tephritoidea and Sciomyzoidea (Dip- Tera: Brachycera) Kaj Winqvist & Jere Kahanpää 20 © Sahlbergia Vol. 12: 20–32, 2007 Checklist of Finnish flies: superfamilies Tephritoidea and Sciomyzoidea (Dip- tera: Brachycera) Kaj Winqvist & Jere Kahanpää Winqvist, K. & Kahanpää, J. 2007: Checklist of Finnish flies: superfamilies Tephritoidea and Sciomyzoidea (Diptera: Brachycera). — Sahlbergia 12:20-32, Helsinki, Finland, ISSN 1237-3273. Another part of the updated checklist of Finnish flies is presented. This part covers the families Lonchaeidae, Pallopteridae, Piophilidae, Platystomatidae, Tephritidae, Ulididae, Coelopidae, Dryomyzidae, Heterocheilidae, Phaeomyii- dae, Sciomyzidae and Sepsidae. Eight species are recorded from Finland for the first time. The following ten species have been erroneously reported from Finland and are here deleted from the Finnish checklist: Chaetolonchaea das- yops (Meigen, 1826), Earomyia crystallophila (Becker, 1895), Lonchaea hirti- ceps Zetterstedt, 1837, Lonchaea laticornis Meigen, 1826, Prochyliza lundbecki (Duda, 1924), Campiglossa achyrophori (Loew, 1869), Campiglossa irrorata (Fallén, 1814), Campiglossa tessellata (Loew, 1844), Dioxyna sororcula (Wie- demann, 1830) and Tephritis nigricauda (Loew, 1856). The Finnish records of Lonchaeidae: Lonchaea bruggeri Morge, Lonchaea contigua Collin, Lonchaea difficilis Hackman and Piophilidae: Allopiophila dudai (Frey) are considered dubious. The total number of species of Tephritoidea and Sciomyzoidea found from Finland is now 262. Kaj Winqvist, Zoological Museum, University of Turku, FI-20014 Turku, Finland. Email: [email protected] Jere Kahanpää, Finnish Environment Institute, P.O. Box 140, FI-00251 Helsinki, Finland. Email: kahanpaa@iki.fi Introduction new millennium there was no concentrated The last complete checklist of Finnish Dipte- Finnish effort to study just these particular ra was published in Hackman (1980a, 1980b). groups. Consequently, before our work the Recent checklists of Finnish species have level of knowledge on Finnish fauna in these been published for ‘lower Brachycera’ i.e. Xy- families was very heterogeneous particularly lophagidae – Empididae by Kahanpää & Win- with regard to Tephritoidea. qvist (2005), Dolichopodidae by Kahanpää & In Tephritidae the monograph by Merz Grichanov (2004) and Syrphidae by Haarto & (1994) covers not only the Central European Kerppola (2004). This paper presents a new fauna but also the Northern European species. checklist of the 151 Finnish species in the su- This work proved very helpful in updating the perfamily Tephritoidea and 111 species in the list of FinnishTephritidae. North European superfamily Sciomyzoidea. Pallopteridae are adequately covered by An- The superfamilies Tephritoidea and Sci- dersson (1990), Morge (1963) and Rotheray omyzoidea have not exactly been neglected (1999). Both Finnish species of Platystoma- in Finland, but before the beginning of the tidae and most ulidids are included in Rich- Winqvist & Kahanpää: Tephritoidea and Sciomyzoidea 21 ter (1989a, 1989b) keys for European part tion of the Finnish dryomyzids is covered by of Russia. An important paper on the ulidid Ozerov (1987) and Stackelberg (1988). The genus Homalocephala was published by An- Finnish fauna of superfamily Sciomyzoidea is dersson (1991). well-known and only a few additions can be Yet, Tephritoidea includes two problema- expected. tic families where the taxonomical situation and existing literature are far less comprising. Material and methods In Piophilidae, the most important key to be The material and methods used were docu- used is still the revision of world Piophilidae mented in the previous part of the checklist by McAlpine (1977). This family includes a published by the authors (Kahanpää & Win- number of poorly known and recently descri- qvist 2005). The majority of examined speci- bed arctic and boreal species, some of which mens are stored in the Diptera Fennica collec- may be present in Finland. One such new spe- tion of the Zoological Museum, University of cies was found during the course of this work Helsinki (MZH). and it will be described in a separate article by The material in the insect collections of Winqvist & Kahanpää (unpublished). the Department of Applied Biology in Viik- The situation was a bit better in Loncha- ki, now part of MZH, Zoological Museum of eidae, where Hackman (1956) had conducted Turku and Natural History and Conservation a good basic study of the Finnish species and Society in Forssa were gone through. Also his work was continued by Nuorteva (1967). several individual collections (coll. Haarto in Also Kovalev (1984) made some important Mietoinen perhaps being the most important) additions to the North European lonchaeids, were checked. Malaise trap and yellow tray but the most helpful contribution in this fami- material caught by Metsähallitus and SYKE ly came from Scotland, where MacGowan has in 2005 were also included in the study. compiled all the existing knowledge of Euro- Species are listed in alphabetic order un- pean lonchaeids in his draft key. Lonchaeidae der the genus name. Additional names used is however a poorly known and taxonomically for the same species are listed under the valid challenging family, so there will certainly be name. Synonyms are listed here only if they future changes in the Finnish list of Loncha- have been used in major Finnish papers, es- eidae. pecially in the previous checklists. All names The second superfamily, Sciomyzoidea, used in the previous checklists are included. has received more attention in Northern Euro- Preoccupied names (preocc.) and emenda- pe during the last decades. Rozkošný’s world tions (emend.) are labelled accordingly. Mi- catalogue of Sciomyzidae and his book on the sidentifications (misid.) are listed only if the Fennoscandian fauna (including Phaeomyii- species was reported as new for Finland under dae) are slightly out of date but still very use- the given name. In this case the author name ful reference works (Rozkošný 1984, 1995). and year refers to the publification of the Fin- Pont (2002) provides keys and descriptions nish record. Species with notes in Results are of all European species of Sepsidae. During marked with an asterisk (*) after the species these two “Fauna Entomologica Scandinavi- name. ca”-projects the Finnish museum material of Sciomyzidae and Sepsidae had already been Results checked. The world sepsid fauna has recently A total of 151 tephritoid and 111 sciomy- been catalogued by Ozerov (2005). Identifica- zoid flies have been found in Finland. Table 22 Winqvist & Kahanpää: Tephritoidea and Sciomyzoidea 1 shows the total number of Finnish species Hackman (1956). Hackman’s specimens for each family in the current checklist and from Karislojo and Utsjoki were reassig- in previously published works (Frey 1941, ned by Morge (1959a) as paratypes of D. Hackman 1980b). Eight species are recorded perpropinquus Morge and D. trichoster- from Finland for the first time. The follo- nalis Morge respectively. A single female wing species have been erroneously reported of D. occultus Collin (sensu Morge) has from Finland - but not necessarily included since been found in Finland: 1 ♀, Ab: in previous checklists - and are here deleted Nauvo (=Nagu), Högsar, 7.-18.vi.1961, from the list of Finnish species: Lonchaeidae: leg. A. Nordman, in MZH. Chaetolonchaea dasyops (Meigen), Earo- Chaetolonchaea dasyops (Meigen): Deleted myia crystallophila (Becker), Lonchaea hirti- from the Finnish checklist. All records ceps Zetterstedt, Lonchaea laticornis Meigen. are based on misidentified specimens of Piophilidae: Prochyliza lundbecki (Duda). C. pallipennis, q. v. Tephritidae: Campiglossa achyrophori (Loew) Chaetolonchaea pallipennis (Zetterstedt): Campiglossa irrorata (Fallén), Campiglossa New to Finland. Misidentified by Fin- tessellata (Loew), Dioxyna sororcula (Wie- nish authors (Hackman 1956) and others demann), Tephritis nigricauda (Loew). The as Chaetolonchaea dasyops (Meigen). circumstances leading these deletions are dis- Locally common in coastal forests in cussed in the notes, q. v. Three lonchaeid and the southern provinces Al, Ab, N and Ka. one piophilid species are listed as doubtful. Hackman (1956) mentions a specimen from Sa: Joutseno, but we have not been Notes able to confirm this record. Dasiops latiterebra (Czerny): Morge (1959b) Earomyia crystallophila (Becker): Omitted lists one specimen from Finland: 1 ♀, Ja- from the checklist. Finnish according to kobstad, Mus. Hels. No. 2549, Exemplar- Kovalev and Morge (1984), but never Nr. 1970. There is one female from Pietar- mentioned in Finnish checklists. All spe- saari (= Jakobstad) in MZH (16.vii.1955, cimens in MZH under names E. nigrovio- leg. R. Storå). Unfortunately it lacks the lacea (Frey in Lundström & Frey, 1913) serial number labels normally found on and E. parvicornis Czerny, 1934 nec. Zet- Dasiops specimens examined by Morge terstedt, 1847 are from the Kola Peninsula and it remains unclear whether it was ac- in northwestern Russia; this includes the tually seen by Morge. sole type specimen of nigroviolacea. Dasiops mucronatus Morge: New to Fin- Lonchaea albigena Collin: Not listed in land. There are three specimens in MZH: Hackman (1980b). Two females are kno- a female from Pietarsaari (= Jakobstad), wn from Finland: 1 ♀, Sa: Mikkeli (= St. 16.vii.1955, leg. R. Storå, a female from Michel), leg. Nordqvist; 1 ♀, Ta: Pirkkala Helsinki, leg. R. Frey, and a male from (= Birkkala), leg. R. Frey, ID 3517, labels Pakila, Helsinki, 6.iv.1950 (ex. larva), ‘Lonchaea hirticeps Zett. ♀ det. Czerny’/ leg. L. Tiensuu. The female
Recommended publications
  • Dipterists Digest
    Dipterists Digest 2019 Vol. 26 No. 1 Cover illustration: Eliozeta pellucens (Fallén, 1820), male (Tachinidae) . PORTUGAL: Póvoa Dão, Silgueiros, Viseu, N 40º 32' 59.81" / W 7º 56' 39.00", 10 June 2011, leg. Jorge Almeida (photo by Chris Raper). The first British record of this species is reported in the article by Ivan Perry (pp. 61-62). Dipterists Digest Vol. 26 No. 1 Second Series 2019 th Published 28 June 2019 Published by ISSN 0953-7260 Dipterists Digest Editor Peter J. Chandler, 606B Berryfield Lane, Melksham, Wilts SN12 6EL (E-mail: [email protected]) Editorial Panel Graham Rotheray Keith Snow Alan Stubbs Derek Whiteley Phil Withers Dipterists Digest is the journal of the Dipterists Forum . It is intended for amateur, semi- professional and professional field dipterists with interests in British and European flies. All notes and papers submitted to Dipterists Digest are refereed. Articles and notes for publication should be sent to the Editor at the above address, and should be submitted with a current postal and/or e-mail address, which the author agrees will be published with their paper. Articles must not have been accepted for publication elsewhere and should be written in clear and concise English. Contributions should be supplied either as E-mail attachments or on CD in Word or compatible formats. The scope of Dipterists Digest is: - the behaviour, ecology and natural history of flies; - new and improved techniques (e.g. collecting, rearing etc.); - the conservation of flies; - reports from the Diptera Recording Schemes, including maps; - records and assessments of rare or scarce species and those new to regions, countries etc.; - local faunal accounts and field meeting results, especially if accompanied by ecological or natural history interpretation; - descriptions of species new to science; - notes on identification and deletions or amendments to standard key works and checklists.
    [Show full text]
  • User's Guide Project: the Impact of Non-Native Predators On
    User’s Guide Project: The Impact of Non-Native Predators on Pollinators and Native Plant Reproduction in a Hawaiian Dryland Ecosystem SERDP project number: RC-2432 Principal Investigators: Christina T. Liang, USDA Forest Service Clare E. Aslan, Northern Arizona University William P. Haines, University of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa Aaron B. Shiels, USDA APHIS Contributor: Manette E. Sandor, Northern Arizona University Date: 30 October 2019 Form Approved REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE OMB No. 0704-0188 Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing this collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden to Department of Defense, Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports (0704-0188), 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202- 4302. Respondents should be aware that notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person shall be subject to any penalty for failing to comply with a collection of information if it does not display a currently valid OMB control number. PLEASE DO NOT RETURN YOUR FORM TO THE ABOVE ADDRESS. 1. REPORT DATE (DD-MM-YYYY) 2. REPORT TYPE 3. DATES COVERED (From - To) 10-30-2019 User’s Guide 01-02-2014 to 10-30-2019 4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE 5a. CONTRACT NUMBER User’s Guide. The Impact of Non-Native Predators on Pollinators and Native Plant Reproduction in a Hawaiian Dryland Ecosystem.
    [Show full text]
  • Impact of Imidacloprid and Horticultural Oil on Nonâ•Fitarget
    University of Tennessee, Knoxville TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Masters Theses Graduate School 8-2007 Impact of Imidacloprid and Horticultural Oil on Non–target Phytophagous and Transient Canopy Insects Associated with Eastern Hemlock, Tsuga canadensis (L.) Carrieré, in the Southern Appalachians Carla Irene Dilling University of Tennessee - Knoxville Follow this and additional works at: https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_gradthes Part of the Entomology Commons Recommended Citation Dilling, Carla Irene, "Impact of Imidacloprid and Horticultural Oil on Non–target Phytophagous and Transient Canopy Insects Associated with Eastern Hemlock, Tsuga canadensis (L.) Carrieré, in the Southern Appalachians. " Master's Thesis, University of Tennessee, 2007. https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_gradthes/120 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. It has been accepted for inclusion in Masters Theses by an authorized administrator of TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. For more information, please contact [email protected]. To the Graduate Council: I am submitting herewith a thesis written by Carla Irene Dilling entitled "Impact of Imidacloprid and Horticultural Oil on Non–target Phytophagous and Transient Canopy Insects Associated with Eastern Hemlock, Tsuga canadensis (L.) Carrieré, in the Southern Appalachians." I have examined the final electronic copy of this thesis for form and content and recommend that it be accepted in partial fulfillment of the equirr ements for the degree of Master of Science, with a major in Entomology and Plant Pathology. Paris L. Lambdin, Major Professor We have read this thesis and recommend its acceptance: Jerome Grant, Nathan Sanders, James Rhea, Nicole Labbé Accepted for the Council: Carolyn R.
    [Show full text]
  • Dipterists Forum
    BULLETIN OF THE Dipterists Forum Bulletin No. 76 Autumn 2013 Affiliated to the British Entomological and Natural History Society Bulletin No. 76 Autumn 2013 ISSN 1358-5029 Editorial panel Bulletin Editor Darwyn Sumner Assistant Editor Judy Webb Dipterists Forum Officers Chairman Martin Drake Vice Chairman Stuart Ball Secretary John Kramer Meetings Treasurer Howard Bentley Please use the Booking Form included in this Bulletin or downloaded from our Membership Sec. John Showers website Field Meetings Sec. Roger Morris Field Meetings Indoor Meetings Sec. Duncan Sivell Roger Morris 7 Vine Street, Stamford, Lincolnshire PE9 1QE Publicity Officer Erica McAlister [email protected] Conservation Officer Rob Wolton Workshops & Indoor Meetings Organiser Duncan Sivell Ordinary Members Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London, SW7 5BD [email protected] Chris Spilling, Malcolm Smart, Mick Parker Nathan Medd, John Ismay, vacancy Bulletin contributions Unelected Members Please refer to guide notes in this Bulletin for details of how to contribute and send your material to both of the following: Dipterists Digest Editor Peter Chandler Dipterists Bulletin Editor Darwyn Sumner Secretary 122, Link Road, Anstey, Charnwood, Leicestershire LE7 7BX. John Kramer Tel. 0116 212 5075 31 Ash Tree Road, Oadby, Leicester, Leicestershire, LE2 5TE. [email protected] [email protected] Assistant Editor Treasurer Judy Webb Howard Bentley 2 Dorchester Court, Blenheim Road, Kidlington, Oxon. OX5 2JT. 37, Biddenden Close, Bearsted, Maidstone, Kent. ME15 8JP Tel. 01865 377487 Tel. 01622 739452 [email protected] [email protected] Conservation Dipterists Digest contributions Robert Wolton Locks Park Farm, Hatherleigh, Oakhampton, Devon EX20 3LZ Dipterists Digest Editor Tel.
    [Show full text]
  • 1659 2012-10323.Pdf
    Zootaxa 3478: 553–569 (2012) ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) www.mapress.com/zootaxa/ ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2012 · Magnolia Press Article ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:EC0F0A87-8BF4-42C6-8561-0AC2ED45E00F The new genus Acrocephalomyia, and a new species of Ropalomera from Costa Rica, with additional records for other Mesoamerican species (Diptera: Ropalomeridae) SERGIO IBÁÑEZ-BERNAL 1 & VICENTE HERNÁNDEZ-ORTIZ 2 1Red Ambiente y Sustentabilidad, Instituto de Ecología, A.C. Carretera antigua a Coatepec No. 351, El Haya, Xalapa, 91070, Veracruz, México. E–mail: [email protected] 2Red Interacciones Multitróficas, Instituto de Ecología, A.C. Carretera antigua a Coatepec No. 351, El Haya, Xalapa, 91070, Veracruz, México. E–mail: [email protected] Abstract New taxa of the family Ropalomeridae from Costa Rica are described, and additional records of ropalomerid flies from Mexico and Central America are provided. The new genus and species Acrocephalomyia zumbadoi can be easily distin- guished from all other ropalomerid genera by the following combination of characters: angular forward projection of head, absence of ocelli, flat face, bare arista, long scutum, and scutellum triangular-shaped and dorsally flattened with only one pair of apical bristles with bases approximated. The new species Ropalomera aterrima can be recognized from congeners by remarkable differences of the head, the shape of the scutellum, the absence of scutal vittae, fumose wings, and by the black coloration of the body, ocellar bristles large, one postpronotal bristle, scutum without pollinose vittae and flat scutel- lum. Lenkokroeberia chryserea Prado and Kroeberia fuliginosa Lindner are newly confirmed for Costa Rica.
    [Show full text]
  • Estudi De Les Gales De La Coŀlecció Vilarrúbia Dipositada Al Museu De Ciències Naturals De Barcelona
    Butlletí de la Institució Catalana d’Història Natural, 81: 137-173. 2017 ISSN 2013-3987 (online edition): ISSN: 1133-6889 (print edition)137 GEA, FLORA ET fauna GEA, FLORA ET FAUNA Estudi de les gales de la coŀlecció Vilarrúbia dipositada al Museu de Ciències Naturals de Barcelona Maria Blanes-Dalmau*, Berta Caballero-López* & Juli Pujade-Villar** * Museu de Ciències Naturals de Barcelona. Laboratori de Natura. Coŀlecció d’artròpodes. Passeig Picasso s/n. 08003 Barcelona. A/e: [email protected] ** Universitat de Barcelona. Facultat de Biologia. Departament de Biologia Evolutiva, Ecologia i Ciències Ambientals (Secció invertebrats). Diagonal, 643. 08028 Barcelona (Catalunya). A/e: [email protected] Correspondència autor: Maria Blanes. A/e: [email protected] Rebut: 05.11.2017; Acceptat: 24.11.2017; Publicat: 28.12.2017 Resum La coŀlecció de gales d’Antoni Vilarrúbia i Garet, dipositada al Museu de Ciències Naturals de Barcelona, ha estat revisada, documen- tada i fotografiada. Està representada per 884 gales que pertanyen a 194 espècies diferents d’agents cecidògens incloent-hi insectes, àcars, fongs i proteobacteris. Els hostes dels agents cecidògens de la coŀlecció estudiada es troben representats per 114 espècies diferents, agrupa- des en 36 famílies, que inclouen formes arbòries, arbustives i herbàcies, on els òrgans vegetals més afectats són les fulles i els borrons. La coŀlecció Vilarrúbia és una mostra ben clara de la diversitat de cecidis que tenim a Catalunya. Paraules clau: gales, fitocecídies zoocecídies, Vilarrúbia, MCNB. Abstract Study of the galls of the Vilarrúbia collection deposited at the Museum of Natural Sciences of Barcelona The gall collection of Antoni Vilarrúbia i Garet deposited in the Barcelona Natural History Museum was reviewed, documented and photographed.
    [Show full text]
  • Nomenclatural Studies Toward a World List of Diptera Genus-Group Names
    Nomenclatural studies toward a world list of Diptera genus-group names. Part V Pierre-Justin-Marie Macquart Evenhuis, Neal L.; Pape, Thomas; Pont, Adrian C. DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4172.1.1 Publication date: 2016 Document version Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Document license: CC BY Citation for published version (APA): Evenhuis, N. L., Pape, T., & Pont, A. C. (2016). Nomenclatural studies toward a world list of Diptera genus- group names. Part V: Pierre-Justin-Marie Macquart. Magnolia Press. Zootaxa Vol. 4172 No. 1 https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4172.1.1 Download date: 02. Oct. 2021 Zootaxa 4172 (1): 001–211 ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) http://www.mapress.com/j/zt/ Monograph ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2016 Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) http://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4172.1.1 http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:22128906-32FA-4A80-85D6-10F114E81A7B ZOOTAXA 4172 Nomenclatural Studies Toward a World List of Diptera Genus-Group Names. Part V: Pierre-Justin-Marie Macquart NEAL L. EVENHUIS1, THOMAS PAPE2 & ADRIAN C. PONT3 1 J. Linsley Gressitt Center for Entomological Research, Bishop Museum, 1525 Bernice Street, Honolulu, Hawaii 96817-2704, USA. E-mail: [email protected] 2 Natural History Museum of Denmark, Universitetsparken 15, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark. E-mail: [email protected] 3Oxford University Museum of Natural History, Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3PW, UK. E-mail: [email protected] Magnolia Press Auckland, New Zealand Accepted by D. Whitmore: 15 Aug. 2016; published: 30 Sept. 2016 Licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0 NEAL L.
    [Show full text]
  • Knowledge Gaps, Training Needs and Bio-Ecological Studies on Fruit-Infesting Flies (Diptera: Tephritidae) in Northern Ghana
    University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh KNOWLEDGE GAPS, TRAINING NEEDS AND BIO-ECOLOGICAL STUDIES ON FRUIT-INFESTING FLIES (DIPTERA: TEPHRITIDAE) IN NORTHERN GHANA BY BADII KONGYELI BENJAMIN MASTER OF PHILOSOPHY IN ENTOMOLOGY UNIVERSITY OF GHANA, LEGON, GHANA THIS THESIS IS SUBMITTED TO THE UNIVERSITY OF GHANA, LEGON IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENT FOR THE AWARD OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY CROP SCIENCE (ENTOMOLOGY) DEGREE JULY, 2014 University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh DECLARATION I hereby declare that this thesis is the result of my own original research, and that it has neither in whole nor in part been presented for a degree elsewhere. Works of others which served as sources of information have been duly acknowledged by reference to the authors. Candidate ………………………… Badii Kongyeli Benjamin Principal Supervisor …………………. Co-supervisor ………………….. Prof. Daniel Obeng-Ofori Prof. Kwame Afreh-Nuamah Co-supervisor …………………… Dr. Maxwell Kevin Billah University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This thesis could not have been accomplished without the guidance of my dear supervisors and academic mentors. My supervisors (Prof. Daniel Obeng-Ofori, Prof. Kwame Afreh-Nuamah and Dr. Maxwell K. Billah) offered me the needed encouragement, support and guidance throughout the study. Also, Prof. Gebriel A. Teye (Pro-Vice Chancellor), Prof. George Nyarko (Dean, Faculty of Agriculture), Dr. Elias N. K. Sowley (Director, Academic Quality Assurance Directorate) and Dr. Isaac K. Addai (Head, Department of Agronomy) all of the University for Development Studies (UDS) approved of my leave of study, supported and encouraged me throughout my study. The Head of Department (Mrs. Dr C.
    [Show full text]
  • ARTHROPODA Subphylum Hexapoda Protura, Springtails, Diplura, and Insects
    NINE Phylum ARTHROPODA SUBPHYLUM HEXAPODA Protura, springtails, Diplura, and insects ROD P. MACFARLANE, PETER A. MADDISON, IAN G. ANDREW, JOCELYN A. BERRY, PETER M. JOHNS, ROBERT J. B. HOARE, MARIE-CLAUDE LARIVIÈRE, PENELOPE GREENSLADE, ROSA C. HENDERSON, COURTenaY N. SMITHERS, RicarDO L. PALMA, JOHN B. WARD, ROBERT L. C. PILGRIM, DaVID R. TOWNS, IAN McLELLAN, DAVID A. J. TEULON, TERRY R. HITCHINGS, VICTOR F. EASTOP, NICHOLAS A. MARTIN, MURRAY J. FLETCHER, MARLON A. W. STUFKENS, PAMELA J. DALE, Daniel BURCKHARDT, THOMAS R. BUCKLEY, STEVEN A. TREWICK defining feature of the Hexapoda, as the name suggests, is six legs. Also, the body comprises a head, thorax, and abdomen. The number A of abdominal segments varies, however; there are only six in the Collembola (springtails), 9–12 in the Protura, and 10 in the Diplura, whereas in all other hexapods there are strictly 11. Insects are now regarded as comprising only those hexapods with 11 abdominal segments. Whereas crustaceans are the dominant group of arthropods in the sea, hexapods prevail on land, in numbers and biomass. Altogether, the Hexapoda constitutes the most diverse group of animals – the estimated number of described species worldwide is just over 900,000, with the beetles (order Coleoptera) comprising more than a third of these. Today, the Hexapoda is considered to contain four classes – the Insecta, and the Protura, Collembola, and Diplura. The latter three classes were formerly allied with the insect orders Archaeognatha (jumping bristletails) and Thysanura (silverfish) as the insect subclass Apterygota (‘wingless’). The Apterygota is now regarded as an artificial assemblage (Bitsch & Bitsch 2000).
    [Show full text]
  • Flies) Benjamin Kongyeli Badii
    Chapter Phylogeny and Functional Morphology of Diptera (Flies) Benjamin Kongyeli Badii Abstract The order Diptera includes all true flies. Members of this order are the most ecologically diverse and probably have a greater economic impact on humans than any other group of insects. The application of explicit methods of phylogenetic and morphological analysis has revealed weaknesses in the traditional classification of dipteran insects, but little progress has been made to achieve a robust, stable clas- sification that reflects evolutionary relationships and morphological adaptations for a more precise understanding of their developmental biology and behavioral ecol- ogy. The current status of Diptera phylogenetics is reviewed in this chapter. Also, key aspects of the morphology of the different life stages of the flies, particularly characters useful for taxonomic purposes and for an understanding of the group’s biology have been described with an emphasis on newer contributions and progress in understanding this important group of insects. Keywords: Tephritoidea, Diptera flies, Nematocera, Brachycera metamorphosis, larva 1. Introduction Phylogeny refers to the evolutionary history of a taxonomic group of organisms. Phylogeny is essential in understanding the biodiversity, genetics, evolution, and ecology among groups of organisms [1, 2]. Functional morphology involves the study of the relationships between the structure of an organism and the function of the various parts of an organism. The old adage “form follows function” is a guiding principle of functional morphology. It helps in understanding the ways in which body structures can be used to produce a wide variety of different behaviors, including moving, feeding, fighting, and reproducing. It thus, integrates concepts from physiology, evolution, anatomy and development, and synthesizes the diverse ways that biological and physical factors interact in the lives of organisms [3].
    [Show full text]
  • Diptera): a Life History, Molecular, Morphological
    The evolutionary biotogy of Conopidae (Diptera): A life history, molecular, morphological, systematic, and taxonomic approach Joel Francis Gibson B.ScHon., University of Guelph, 1999 M.Sc, Iowa State University, 2002 B.Ed., Ontario Institute for Studies in Education/University of Toronto, 2003 A thesis submitted to the Faculty of Graduate and Postdoctoral Affairs in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Biology Carleton University Ottawa, Ontario © 2011 Joel Francis Gibson Library and Archives Bibliotheque et 1*1 Canada Archives Canada Published Heritage Direction du Branch Patrimoine de Pedition 395 Wellington Street 395, rue Wellington Ottawa ON K1A 0N4 Ottawa ON K1A 0N4 Canada Canada Your Tile Votre r&ference ISBN: 978-0-494-83217-2 Our file Notre reference ISBN: 978-0-494-83217-2 NOTICE: AVIS: The author has granted a non­ L'auteur a accorde une licence non exclusive exclusive license allowing Library and permettant a la Bibliotheque et Archives Archives Canada to reproduce, Canada de reproduire, publier, archiver, publish, archive, preserve, conserve, sauvegarder, conserver, transmettre au public communicate to the public by par telecommunication ou par I'lnternet, preter, telecommunication or on the Internet, distribuer et vendre des theses partout dans le loan, distribute and sell theses monde, a des fins commerciales ou autres, sur worldwide, for commercial or non­ support microforme, papier, electronique et/ou commercial purposes, in microform, autres formats. paper, electronic and/or any other formats. The author retains copyright L'auteur conserve la propriete du droit d'auteur ownership and moral rights in this et des droits moraux qui protege cette these.
    [Show full text]
  • Prerequisites for Understanding and Managing Fruit Flies (Diptera: Tephritidae)
    KERAGAMAN DAN KELIMPAHAN LALAT BUAH (Diptera: Tephritidae) PADA TIGA EKOSISTEM YANG BERBEDA DI SLEMAN, YOGYAKARTA VALENTINA ERLINE F, Prof. Ir. Y. Andi Trisyono, M.Sc., Ph.D.; Dr. Suputa, S.P., M.P. Universitas Gadjah Mada, 2020 | Diunduh dari http://etd.repository.ugm.ac.id/ DAFTAR PUSTAKA Allwood, A.J. 1997. Biology and ecology: prerequisites for understanding and managing fruit flies (Diptera: Tephritidae). In: A.J. Allwood, R.A.I. Drew (Eds.). Management of Fruit Flies in the Pacific: A Regional Symposium. ACIAR Proc. No. 76. Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research, Canberra. 95–101. Allwood, A.J., A. Chinajariyawong, S. Kritsaneepaiboon, R.A.I. Drew, E.L. Hamacek, D.L. Hancock, C. Hengsawad, J.C. Jipanin, M. Jirasurat, C.K. Krong, C.T.S. Leong & S. Vijaysegaran. 1999. Host plant records for fruit flies (Diptera: Tephritidae) in Southeast Asia. Raffles Bull. Zool. 47(Supplement 7): 1-92. Aluja, M. 1994. Bionomics and management of Anastrepha. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 39 (1): 155-178. Aluja, M. & J. Rull. 2009. Managing pestiferous fruit flies (Diptera: Tephritidae) through environmental manipulation. In: M. Aluja, T.C. Leskey, C. Vincent (Eds.). Biorational Tree Fruit Pest Management. CABI. Oxfordshire, UK. 171-213. Aluja, M. & R.L. Mangan. 2008. Fruit fly (Diptera: Tephritidae) host status determination: critical conceptual, methodological, and regulatory considerations. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 53: 473-502. Astuti, N.K., S. Suputa, N.S. Putra & M. Indarwatmi. 2019. Gamma irradiation treatment of Bactrocera dorsalis Hendel (Diptera: Tephritidae) in snake fruit. J. Perlindungan Tanam. Indones. 23(2): 242-249. Atlas of Living Australia (ALA). 2019a. Tachiniscinae. https://bie.ala.org.au/species/urn:lsid:biodiversity.org.au:afd.taxon:0d32abcc- 1dc1-4fd8-9cef-7db21a8fd7e8#overview (diakses 3 November 2019).
    [Show full text]