Cape Lambert Port B Development
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Cape Lambert Port B Development PUBLIC ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW AND DRAFT PUBLIC ENVIRONMENT REPORT 17 March 2009 EPBC Referral Number 2008/4032 Sinclair Knight Merz 7th Floor, Durack Centre 263 Adelaide Terrace PO Box H615 Perth WA 6001 Australia Tel: +61 8 9268 4400 Fax: +61 8 9268 4488 Web: www.skmconsulting.com LIMITATION: This report has been prepared on behalf of and for the exclusive use of Sinclair Knight Merz Pty Ltd’s Client, and is subject to and issued in connection with the provisions of the agreement between Sinclair Knight Merz and its Client. Sinclair Knight Merz accepts no liability or responsibility whatsoever for or in respect of any use of or reliance upon this report by any third party. The SKM logo is a trade mark of Sinclair Knight Merz Pty Ltd. © Sinclair Knight Merz Pty Ltd, 2006 Cape Lambert Port B Development Invitation to Make a Submission The Environmental Protection Authority (EPA) and the Department of the Environment, Water, Heritage and the Arts (DEWHA) invite people to make a submission on this proposal. Both electronic and hard copy submissions are welcome. In accordance with the Environmental Protection Act 1986 (WA) (EP Act) and the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (Cwth) (EPBC Act) a Public Environmental Review and draft Public Environment Report (PER) has been prepared which describes the proposal by Pilbara Iron Pty Ltd (Pilbara Iron) to construct and operate the Port B development at Cape Lambert, and its likely effects on the environment. The PER is available for a public review period of eight weeks from Monday 13 April 2009, closing on Tuesday 9 June 2009. Comments from government agencies and the public will assist the EPA to prepare an assessment report in which it will make recommendations to government. Comments will also assist with the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (Cwth) (EPBC Act) and Environment Protection (Sea Dumping) Act 1981 (Cwth) assessments. Where to get copies of this document A CD-ROM version of the PER will be provided by the Proponent on request. An electronic copy of the PER and appendices are available from the website: http://www.riotintoironore.com/ENG/media/337.asp. Why write a submission? A submission is a way to provide information, express your opinion and put forward your suggested course of action–including any alternative approach. It is useful if you indicate any suggestions you have to improve the proposal. All submissions received by the EPA will be acknowledged and will also be provided to the DEWHA. Submissions will be treated as public documents unless provided and received in confidence subject to the requirements of the Freedom of Information Act 1992 (WA) and the Freedom of Information Act 1982 (Cwth) and may be quoted in full or in part in each report. Why not join a group? If you prefer not to write your own comments, it may be worthwhile joining with a group or other groups interested in making a submission on similar issues. Joint submissions may help to reduce the workload for an individual or group, as well as increase the pool of ideas and information. If you form a small group (up to 10 people) please indicate all the names of the participants. If your group is larger, please indicate how many people your submission represents. Developing a submission You may agree or disagree with, or comment on, the general issues discussed in the PER or the specific proposal. It helps if you give reasons for your conclusions, supported by relevant data. You may make an important contribution by suggesting ways to make the proposal environmentally more acceptable. When making comments on specific elements of the PER: clearly state your point of view indicate the source of your information or argument if this is applicable SINCLAIR KNIGHT MERZ PAGE i © Rio Tinto 2008 Cape Lambert Port B Development suggest recommendations, safeguards or alternatives. Points to keep in mind By keeping the following points in mind, you will make it easier for your submission to be analysed: Attempt to list points so that issues raised are clear. A summary of your submission is helpful. Refer each point to the appropriate section, chapter or recommendation in the PER. If you discuss different sections of the PER, keep them distinct and separate, so there is no confusion as to which section you are considering. Attach any factual information you may wish to provide and give details of the source. Make sure your information is accurate. Remember to include your name, address, the date and whether you want your submission to be confidential in any submission. Information in submissions will be deemed public information unless a request for confidentiality of the submission is made in writing and accepted by the EPA. As a result, a copy of each submission will be provided to the Proponent but the identity of private individuals will remain confidential to the EPA. The closing date for submissions is: Tuesday 9 June 2009. The EPA prefers submissions to be made electronically using one of the following: the submission form on the EPA’s website: www.epa.wa.gov.au/submissions.asp by email to [email protected] by email to the officer [email protected]. Alternatively, submissions can be posted to: Attention: Dr. Sue Osborne Environmental Protection Authority Locked Bag 33, CLOISTERS SQUARE WA 6850. delivered to: Attention: Dr. Sue Osborne Environmental Protection Authority Level 4, The Atrium 168 St Georges Terrace, Perth. faxed, attention Dr. Sue Osborne, to: (08) 6467 5562. If you have any questions on how to make a submission, please ring the EPA assessment officer, Dr. Sue Osborne on (08) 6467 5441. PAGE ii SINCLAIR KNIGHT MERZ © Rio Tinto 2008 Cape Lambert Port B Development Executive Summary Introduction This Public Environmental Review and draft Public Environment Report (PER) assesses the environmental impacts of a proposed iron ore handling, processing and ship loading facility at Cape Lambert (the Cape Lambert Port B development), located near Wickham and Point Samson in the Pilbara region of Western Australia. The Proponent for the Cape Lambert Port B development is Pilbara Iron Pty Limited, a management arm for the Rio Tinto Iron Ore product group (Rio Tinto). The Proposal is subject to a co-ordinated parallel environmental assessment process which requires assessment by both the Western Australian and Commonwealth governments in accordance with the Environmental Protection Act 1986 (WA) (EP Act), the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (Cwth) (EPBC Act) and the Environment Protection (Sea Dumping) Act 1981 (Cwth). The PER has been prepared to fulfil the requirements of the approved Environmental Scoping Document and Guidelines by the Environmental Protection Authority (EPA) and the Department of the Environment, Water, Heritage and the Arts (DEWHA). The Proposal The existing Cape Lambert operation (Port A) has recently been upgraded, increasing the Port A approved capacity from 55 million tonnes per annum (Mtpa) to 85 Mtpa. With the global demand for iron ore predicted to continue in the long term, a second port facility with a throughput capacity up to 130 Mtpa is proposed to be developed at Cape Lambert. In combination with Port A, the Port B development will increase the Cape Lambert throughput capacity to nominally 215 Mtpa. The Port B development is effectively a green-field development located within an area associated with Port A. Development of a second port facility at Cape Lambert encompasses both onshore and marine works (Figure ES-1-1) and includes: ore handling facilities (incorporating rail tracks, car dumpers, conveyors, stackers, stockpiles, reclaimers and screenhouses) supporting operational infrastructure (including offices, warehouses and workshops) marine facilities (incorporating jetty and wharf, and shiploaders) dredging for berth pockets, turning basins, departure channel, service wharf and tug harbour supporting construction infrastructure (including laydown and storage areas). SINCLAIR KNIGHT MERZ PAGE iii © Rio Tinto 2008 Cape Lambert Port B Development Figure ES-1-1 Indicative location and key components of the Port B development PAGE iv SINCLAIR KNIGHT MERZ © Rio Tinto 2008 Cape Lambert Port B Development The key project characteristics for the Port B development are provided in Table ES-1-1. Table ES-1-1 Preliminary key project characteristics Project Characteristic Cape Lambert Port B Development * Nominal Cape Lambert Port B Up to 130 Mtpa capacity Access jetty and wharf Up to 2700 m (from conveyor junction on land to end of wharf) Number of ship loading berths Up to 4 Dredging Dredging for berth pockets, turning basins, departure channel, Service Wharf B and tug harbour extension. Placement of spoil at existing spoil grounds. Estimated dredge volume up to 16 Mm3. Stockyard Stockpiles to accommodate nominal 130 Mtpa throughput Bulk stockpile capacity No separate or dedicated bulking stockyards Facility footprint Approximately 340 ha land based Major plant components 3 car dumpers 2 screenhouses (lump rescreening plants) 2 sample systems 3–4 stackers 3 reclaimers 2 ship loaders Conveyors and transfer stations *Characteristics refer to the Port B development only and do not include Port A operations Community Consultation The Proponent has engaged in a public consultation process since 2007 for the Port B development. This consultation is ongoing and will continue with regard to this current proposal. Key issues raised through the consultation program for the Port B development were: identification and assessment of the environmental impacts from dredging and dredge spoil disposal activities impacts and management measures for nesting turtles risks to marine mammals water supply and use over life of project dust management workforce strategy. Environmental Impacts and Management The Proponent identified marine biodiversity, terrestrial fauna, water resources, air quality (particulate dust), ambient noise as key factors relevant to the assessment of the Port B proposal.