DOCSLIB.ORG

CSI Report Macedonia

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

15 YEARS OF TRANSITION – A COUNTRY MOVING TOWARDS CITIZEN PARTICIPATION CIVICUS Civil Society Index Report for the Republic of Macedonia Macedonian Center for International Cooperation Skopje 2005 An international action-research project coordinated by CIVICUS: World Alliance for Citizen Participation 2 The CIVICUS Civil Society Index Report for the Republic of Macedonia is prepared by the members of the National Index Team. Sašo Klekovski, editor Authors of the Analysis of Civil Society in Macedonia: STRUCTURE Fatmir Bytyqi, co-author Goran Buldioski, co-author ENVIRONMENT Emina Nuredinoska, co-author Nataša Gaber-Damjanovska, co-author VALUES Sun čica Sazdovska, co-author Kelmend Zajazi, co-author IMPACT Biljana Gerasimovska-Kitanovska, co-author Sašo Klekovski, co-author Author of: Executive Summary, Civil Society in Macedonia, Strengths and Weaknesses of Macedonian Civil Society, Recommendations for the Future of Civil Society and Conclusions: Sašo Klekovski Project and research coordination: Daniela Stojanova External Consultant: John Beauclerk, INTRAC Translation: Elizabeta Bakovska The CSI project in Macedonia was financially supported by funds of: CIVICUS Civil Society Index Report for Macedonia 3 FOREWORD The Macedonian Center for International Cooperation (MCIC) has been one of the leading civil society organisations (CSOs) in Macedonia and the Balkans since its establishment in 1993. Civil society development, as well as participatory democracy, has been the foundation of the MCIC mission. In order to fulfil these goals, MCIC is focused on CSOs strengthening and the most direct level of power – local self-government. In the first years, most of the activities were directed towards organisational development. The first institutional development activates for civil society as a whole was undertaken in 1995, with the activities for adoption of a Law on Citizen Associations and Foundations (adopted in 1998). The institutional development became particularly important after 2001, when the biggest clash in the country, challenging the entire civic sector took place. This was the year of the large scale confrontation with the government and significant criticism of the results and autonomy of the complete civic sector. 2001 as the beginning of the Forum of Civil Society in Macedonia – NGO Fair, which was the catalyst for the activities based on common interests of the civic sector in Macedonia. MCIC and other CSOs needed informed debate on the results and influence of the civic sector. The initial contact between CIVICUS and MCIC was a result of a search for a solution for this and we were glad to see that the concept of the CIVICUS Civil Society Index (CSI) fit perfectly with the need to assess the impact of the civic sector in Macedonia. Therefore, MCIC and the civic sector conducted the CSI with great dedication and there is now an excellent opportunity for informed debate. The CSI also added value beyond the research, since it generated dialogue among the key actors of the civic sector. This dialogue provided the first approximation of the understanding (definition) of civil society. This understanding is now much broader and more inclusive than before and implies a move from the previously used term ‘NGO’ towards ‘CSOs’ and ‘civil society actors’. The CSI also contributed to the establishment of new networks and new activities. The CSI helped MCIC strengthen its relations with CIVICUS (and its involvement in other activities) and with organisations, namely CSI partners in other countries. The research can be considered a joint work of the civic sector in Macedonia. It is an investment in a common strategy for civic sector development in Macedonia, in which the government will be a partner in the strengthening of civil society. Sašo Klekovski MCIC Executive Director CIVICUS Civil Society Index Report for Macedonia 4 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS MCIC cooperated with many organisations and individuals in the preparation of civil society Index. The methodology of the project was developed by CIVICUS – World Alliance for Citizen Participation. Since the very beginning, MCIC has successfully cooperated with the National Advisory Group (NAG). We thank all of the NAG members who contributed their time, knowledge and energy in the creation of CSI: Abdurauf Prusi, Violeta Eftimova, Vladimir Mil čin, Doj čin Cvetanovski, Dragi Zmijanac, Gjuner Ismail, Zvonko Šavrevski, Zoran Kostov, Zoran Stojkovski, Igor Taseski, Savka Todorovska, Samet Skenderi, Slagjana Taseva, Shpend Ymeri, Gordana Duvnjak, Liljana Popovska, Nataša Gaber-Damjanovska, Nafi Saraçini, Ratko Lazarevski and Sonja Stefanovska-Trajanoska. We also thank the organisations: Association for Campaign for Cancer “Nov zivot” from Štip; Humanitarian and Charity Roma Organisation “Mese čina” from Gostivar; Centre for Support of NGOs from Veles; Center for Roma Community “Drom” from Kumanovo; Center for Civic Initiative from Prilep; and Union of Women’s Organisations in Macedonia, who helped organise the regional stakeholder consultations. Of course, the project could not be realised without the support and help of all MCIC employees and we thank them. Special thanks to Aleksandar Kržalovski, Adis Rahi ć, Danilo Mitov and Krenar Kuka. The participants in the on-job training of MCIC also helped us in part of the research. The Community Sample was implemented by our long term partner Institute for Sociological, Political and Juridical Research (ISPJR) and generated data on the opinion and activities of citizens of the Republic of Macedonia. Also we would like to express our gratitude to Zoran Ja čev, Slagjana Dimiškova, Slavko Lazovski. The CSI project in Macedonia was financially supported by funds of the Macedonian Center for International Cooperation, DanChurchAid (DCA), Inter-church organisation for development co-operation (ICCO) and the United Nations Development Program (UNDP). We would also like to thank to the CIVICUS CSI project team, Mahi Khallaf and Volkhart Finn Heinrich, for their constant support and guidance on the implementation of CSI in Macedonia. National Index Team CIVICUS Civil Society Index Report for Macedonia 5 TABLE OF CONTENTS FOREWORD ....................................................................................................................................................... 3 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ....................................................................................................................................... 4 TABLES , FIGURES , AND FRAMES ....................................................................................................................... 6 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ....................................................................................................................................10 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................................14 I. CIVIL SOCIETY INDEX AND ITS APPROACH ......................................................................................16 I.1. PROJECT BACKGROUND ...............................................................................................................................16 I.2. PROJECT METHODOLOGY AND APPROACH ....................................................................................................17 II. CIVIL SOCIETY IN MACEDONIA ..........................................................................................................22 II.1. FEATURES (D EVELOPMENT ) OF THE MACEDONIAN CIVIL SOCIETY .............................................................22 II.2. CONCEPT OF MACEDONIAN CIVIL SOCIETY .................................................................................................24 II.3. MAPPING MACEDONIAN CIVIL SOCIETY ......................................................................................................27 III. ANALYSIS OF CIVIL SOCIETY...............................................................................................................30 III.1. STRUCTURE ..............................................................................................................................................30 III.1.1. Breadth of Citizen Participation .......................................................................................................30 III.1.2. Depth of Citizen Participation ..........................................................................................................35 III.1.3. Diversity of Civil Society Participants .............................................................................................39 III.1.4. Level of Organisation .......................................................................................................................43 III.1.5. Inter-Relations..................................................................................................................................49 III.1.6. Resources..........................................................................................................................................51 CONCLUSION .................................................................................................................................................54 III.2. ENVIRONMENT .........................................................................................................................................55 III.2.1. Political Context ..............................................................................................................................55
Recommended publications
  • Poland (Mainly) Chooses Stability and Continuity: the October 2011 Polish Parliamentary Election

    Poland (Mainly) Chooses Stability and Continuity: the October 2011 Polish Parliamentary Election

    Poland (mainly) chooses stability and continuity: The October 2011 Polish parliamentary election Aleks Szczerbiak [email protected] University of Sussex SEI Working Paper No. 129 1 The Sussex European Institute publishes Working Papers (ISSN 1350-4649) to make research results, accounts of work-in-progress and background information available to those concerned with contemporary European issues. The Institute does not express opinions of its own; the views expressed in this publication are the responsibility of the author. The Sussex European Institute, founded in Autumn 1992, is a research and graduate teaching centre of the University of Sussex, specialising in studies of contemporary Europe, particularly in the social sciences and contemporary history. The SEI has a developing research programme which defines Europe broadly and seeks to draw on the contributions of a range of disciplines to the understanding of contemporary Europe. The SEI draws on the expertise of many faculty members from the University, as well as on those of its own staff and visiting fellows. In addition, the SEI provides one-year MA courses in Contemporary European Studies and European Politics and opportunities for MPhil and DPhil research degrees. http://www.sussex.ac.uk/sei/ First published in March 2012 by the Sussex European Institute University of Sussex, Falmer, Brighton BN1 9RG Tel: 01273 678578 Fax: 01273 678571 E-mail: [email protected] © Sussex European Institute Ordering Details The price of this Working Paper is £5.00 plus postage and packing. Orders should be sent to the Sussex European Institute, University of Sussex, Falmer, Brighton BN1 9RG.
  • Macedonia Competitiveness Activity Quarterly Report April 2006 – June 2006

    Macedonia Competitiveness Activity Quarterly Report April 2006 – June 2006

    Macedonia Competitiveness Activity Quarterly Report April 2006 – June 2006 ul. Bukureska 133b Skopje, Macedonia Tel: (389 2) 309-1711; Fax: (389 2) 307-9158 MACEDONIA COMPETITIVENESS ACTIVITY Quarterly Report: April – June 2006 Executive Summary NECC: The National Entrepreneurship & Competitiveness Council celebrated its three- year anniversary. The role of the Council was formally recognized by the government as a forum and means for dialogue between the public and the private sectors. Macedonia received higher credit rating from Fitch Credit of London and was described as a safer investment destination. PED: By conducting a one-month PR road show around the country MCA’s Public Education Department (PED) reinforced cluster messages and widely publicized the results achieved. Special printed materials on each cluster and the NECC, featuring the MCA final stage results, have supported the campaign. An event to celebrate the project’s outstanding results crowned the forward-set MCA PR strategy. PED staff managed to maintain good communication with the media/public despite the governmental elections' black out period. Lamb and Cheese: LTM (Lamb to Market) set up a functional sales structure to take advantage of opportunities to place Macedonian lamb in the Greek market year round. The LTM team plans to host a visit of the appointed sales agent and a potential client in order to demonstrate the capabilities of Macedonian lamb producers to satisfy the needs of Greek lamb buyers. Tourism: Members of the Tourism Cluster and the Tikves Wine Road Foundation worked together to initiate the development of wine tourism in the Tikves Region. With assistance from MCA Tourism Consultant, Susan Snelson, the group built a solid base for future development of tourism in the Tikves region.
  • The Current Position of the Foreign Terrorist Fighters in the Republic of North Macedonia

    The Current Position of the Foreign Terrorist Fighters in the Republic of North Macedonia

    Journal of Liberty and International Affairs | Vol. 7, No. 1, 2021 | eISSN 1857-9760 Published online by the Institute for Research and European Studies at www.e-jlia.com © 2021 The Author/s This is an open-access article under the terms of the CC-BY 3.0 License. Peer review method: Double-Blind Date of acceptance: March 02, 2021 Date of publication: March 24, 2021 Original scientific article Thematic section: North Macedonia: Interdisciplinary Aspects DOI: https://www.doi.org/10.47305/JLIA21170027i THE CURRENT POSITION OF THE FOREIGN TERRORIST FIGHTERS IN THE REPUBLIC OF NORTH MACEDONIA Ice Ilijevski Faculty of Law, University “St. Kliment Ohridski” – Bitola, North Macedonia ORCID iD: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8515-2032 [email protected] Katerina Krstevska Savovska Faculty of Security - Skopje, University “St. Kliment Ohridski” – Bitola, North Macedonia [email protected] Abstract: Terrorism with religious ideological background today is a serious global threat. The modern infrastructure and the communications of movement allowed terrorist organizations to be able to attack everywhere in the world. The issue that is a point of interest of this paper is the current situation of returning the foreign terrorist fighters to their home country or third countries and the security consequences that may arise if they are not treated properly. For a more detailed perception of this problem through the case analysis – an operative police action related to the foreign terrorist fighters, the functional aspects of the criminal prosecution bodies of the Republic of North Macedonia will be better perceived and studied. Also, a special emphasis will be placed on the strategy for the fight against violent extremism and the financing of terrorist fighters.
  • Attachement 2 Inter-Ethnic Conflicts in Kazakhstan

    Attachement 2 Inter-Ethnic Conflicts in Kazakhstan

    ATTACHEMENT 2 INTER-ETHNIC CONFLICTS IN KAZAKHSTAN BETWEEN 2006 AND 2007 Events in Aktau On August 20, 2006 Aktau City witnessed riots. Printed mass media reported that originally an unauthorized but peaceful rally of workers was taking place at the central square of the city Yntymak. The workers of Mangistau MunayGas OJSC were demanding salary increase. According to City Akimat (local authority), around 10 or 15 people were participating in the rally. Next day information leaked to the press that there were more than 200 people gathered at the square by night. According to city authorities small groups from the rally moved to courtyards of resident buildings and tried to organize pogroms. Other sources speak about clashes with police and number of arrested vary between 17 and 25 persons. Participants of the rally were joined by the youth who started violent clashes with the police. Opposition mass media reported that at that moment some people in crowed began screaming racial offenses against the Caucasians who live in the area and then began to smash cafeterias and shops owned by Lezgins, Chechens and Azerbaijanis. Mangyshlak peninsula which hosts port city of Aktau has already several times been a field of interethnic conflicts. The most notorious one is a massacre in New Ozen (currently Zhanaozen) of summer 1989 when indigenous people had bloody fights with Lezgins and Chechens. From time to time local conflicts between indigenous people, i.e. Kazakhs, and representatives of the Caucasian diasporas take place in villages of Mangyshlak peninsula. As a rule conflicts arise out of incidents of a criminal nature.
  • What It Means and What&#8217

    What It Means and What’

    Cracking Down on Creative Voices: Turkey’s Silencing of Writers, Intellectuals, and Artists Five Years After the Failed Coup Thank you for joining us for Cracking Down on Creative Voices: Turkey’s Silencing of Writers, Intellectuals, and Artists Five Years After the Failed Coup Since the attempted coup d’état in 2016, Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan has elevated his attacks on Turkey’s civil society to unprecedented levels, becoming one of the world’s foremost persecutors of freedom of expression. In the five years since the attempted coup, dozens of writers, activists, artists, and intellectuals have been targeted, prosecuted, and jailed; 29 publishing houses have been closed; over 135,000 books have been banned from Turkish public libraries; and more than 5,800 academics have been dismissed from their posts for expressing dissent. PEN America’s 2020 Freedom to Write Index found that Turkey was the world’s third highest imprisoner of writers and public intellectuals, with at least 25 cases of detention or imprisonment. This repressive climate has left writers and other members of Turkey’s cultural sector feeling embattled and targeted, unsure of what they can say or write without falling into their government’s crosshairs. PEN America, the Project on Middle East Democracy (POMED), and members of Turkey’s cultural, artistic, and literary communities discussed these trends and made recommendations on how policymakers might respond to Erdoğan’s campaign of repression. The discussion highlighted PEN America’s report on freedom of expression in Turkey, which features interviews from members of Turkey’s literary, cultural, and human rights communities to better understand how this society- wide crackdown has affected freedom of expression within the country.
  • Turkmenistan 2016 Human Rights Report

    Turkmenistan 2016 Human Rights Report

    TURKMENISTAN 2016 HUMAN RIGHTS REPORT EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Although the 2016 constitution declares Turkmenistan to be a secular democracy, the country has an authoritarian government controlled by the president, Gurbanguly Berdimuhamedov, and his inner circle. Berdimuhamedov has been president since 2006 and remained president following a February 2012 election the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe’s (OSCE) Office of Democratic Institutions and Human Rights determined involved limited choice between competing political alternatives. In August the country conducted interim parliamentary elections, which were not subject to international observation, to fill a limited number of vacant seats. In September parliament ratified a new constitution that extended the presidential term in office from five to seven years, cancelled a maximum age limit of 70 years, and failed to reintroduce earlier term limits. Civilian authorities maintained effective control over the security forces. The most important human rights problems were: arbitrary arrest and detention; involuntary confinement; torture; disregard for civil liberties, including restrictions on freedoms of religion, speech, press, assembly, and movement; and citizens’ inability to choose their government through free-and-fair elections that include real political alternatives. Other continuing human rights problems included denial of due process and fair trial and arbitrary interference with privacy, home, and correspondence. Restrictions on access to the internet and certain sites and information sources remained a significant problem. There was also discrimination and violence against women; trafficking in persons, including use of government-compelled forced labor during the annual cotton harvest; restrictions on the free association of workers; and forced destruction of domiciles of Ashgabat residents.
  • The U.S. South Caucasus Strategy and Azerbaijan

    The U.S. South Caucasus Strategy and Azerbaijan

    THE U.S. SOUTH CAUCASUS STRATEGY AND AZERBAIJAN This article analyzes the evolution of U.S. foreign policy in the South Cauca- sus through three concepts, “soft power”, “hard power” and “smart power” which have been developed under the administrations of Bill Clinton, George W. Bush and Barack Obama respectively. The authors also aim to identify how the US strategy towards this region has been perceived in Azerbaijan, which, due to its geographical position, energy resources and geopolitical environment, is one of the “geopolitical pivots of Eurasia”. Inessa Baban & Zaur Shiriyev* * Inessa Baban is a Ph.D candidate in geopolitics at Paris-Sorbonne University of France. She is a former visiting scholar at Center for Strategic Studies under the President of Azerbaijan. Zaur Shiriyev is a foreign policy analyst at the same think tank. The views expressed in this article are entirely personal. 93 VOLUME 9 NUMBER 2 INESSA BABAN & ZAUR SHIRIYEV he U.S. strategy towards the South Caucasus has become one of the most controversial issues of American foreign policy under the Obama administration. Most American experts argue that because of the current priorities of the U.S. government, the South Caucasus region does not get the attention that it merits. Even if they admit that none of U.S.’ interests in the Caucasus “fall under the vital category”1 there is a realization that Washington must reconsider its policy towards this region which matters geopolitically, economically and strategically. The South Caucasus, also referred as Transcaucasia, is located between the Black Sea and the Caspian Sea, neighboring Central Asia to the east, the Middle East to the south, and Eastern Europe to the west, hence connecting Europe to Asia.
  • Declining Support for Government of Donald Tusk and for Civic Platform (Po)

    Declining Support for Government of Donald Tusk and for Civic Platform (Po)

    DECLINING SUPPORT FOR GOVERNMENT OF DONALD TUSK AND FOR CIVIC PLATFORM (PO) The coalition of Civic Platform and Polish Peasant Party (PO-PSL), which has governed Poland for over four years, is losing social support. Evaluations of the government of Donald Tusk have deteriorated. At present, they are the worst, if both parliamentary terms are considered. The decline was precipitated by, among others, problems with implementation of new rules on refunding medicines, signing of the ACTA agreement (a decision from which the government eventually withdrew), and planned changes in the pension system, especially raising the retirement age to 67 years. From Dec. 2011 to March 2012 the proportion of government supporters fell from 44% to 31%, while the number of opponents rose from 31% to 45%. ATTITUDE TO THE GOVERNMENT OF DONALD TUSK “Don't know” omitted The popularity of the Prime Minster is diminishing. The proportion of respondents satisfied with the work of Donald Tusk as Prime Minister fell from 49% in Dec. 2011 to 33% in March 2012. At the same time, the number of the dissatisfied rose from 38% to 57%. SATISFACTION WITH DONALD TUSK AS PRIME MINISTER “Don't know” omitted The effects of government's activities are perceived ever more critically. The proportion of people satisfied with them fell in the last four months from 45% to 25%, while the number of the dissatisfied rose from 40% to 67%. EVALUATION OF EFFECTS OF ACTIVITY OF DONALD TUSK'S GOVERNMENT UP TO DATE “Don't know” omitted The decline in support for the government is accompanied by a drop in the ratings of the Civic Platform (PO).
  • English and INTRODACTION

    English and INTRODACTION

    CHANGES AND CONTINUITY IN EVERYDAY LIFE IN ALBANIA, BULGARIA AND MACEDONIA 1945-2000 UNDERSTANDING A SHARED PAST LEARNING FOR THE FUTURE 1 This Teacher Resource Book has been published in the framework of the Stability Pact for South East Europe CONTENTS with financial support from the Dutch Ministry of Foreign Affairs. It is available in Albanian, Bulgarian, English and INTRODACTION..............................................3 Macedonian language. POLITICAL LIFE...........................................17 CONSTITUTION.....................................................20 Title: Changes and Continuity in everyday life in Albania, ELECTIONS...........................................................39 Bulgaria and Macedonia POLITICAL PERSONS..............................................50 HUMAN RIGHTS....................................................65 Author’s team: Terms.................................................................91 ALBANIA: Chronology........................................................92 Adrian Papajani, Fatmiroshe Xhemali (coordinators), Agron Nishku, Bedri Kola, Liljana Guga, Marie Brozi. Biographies........................................................96 BULGARIA: Bibliography.......................................................98 Rumyana Kusheva, Milena Platnikova (coordinators), Teaching approches..........................................101 Bistra Stoimenova, Tatyana Tzvetkova,Violeta Stoycheva. ECONOMIC LIFE........................................103 MACEDONIA: CHANGES IN PROPERTY.......................................104
  • Stream Name Category Name Coronavirus (COVID-19) |EU| FRANCE TNTSAT ---TNT-SAT ---|EU| FRANCE TNTSAT TF1 SD |EU|

    Stream Name Category Name Coronavirus (COVID-19) |EU| FRANCE TNTSAT ---TNT-SAT ---|EU| FRANCE TNTSAT TF1 SD |EU|

    stream_name category_name Coronavirus (COVID-19) |EU| FRANCE TNTSAT ---------- TNT-SAT ---------- |EU| FRANCE TNTSAT TF1 SD |EU| FRANCE TNTSAT TF1 HD |EU| FRANCE TNTSAT TF1 FULL HD |EU| FRANCE TNTSAT TF1 FULL HD 1 |EU| FRANCE TNTSAT FRANCE 2 SD |EU| FRANCE TNTSAT FRANCE 2 HD |EU| FRANCE TNTSAT FRANCE 2 FULL HD |EU| FRANCE TNTSAT FRANCE 3 SD |EU| FRANCE TNTSAT FRANCE 3 HD |EU| FRANCE TNTSAT FRANCE 3 FULL HD |EU| FRANCE TNTSAT FRANCE 4 SD |EU| FRANCE TNTSAT FRANCE 4 HD |EU| FRANCE TNTSAT FRANCE 4 FULL HD |EU| FRANCE TNTSAT FRANCE 5 SD |EU| FRANCE TNTSAT FRANCE 5 HD |EU| FRANCE TNTSAT FRANCE 5 FULL HD |EU| FRANCE TNTSAT FRANCE O SD |EU| FRANCE TNTSAT FRANCE O HD |EU| FRANCE TNTSAT FRANCE O FULL HD |EU| FRANCE TNTSAT M6 SD |EU| FRANCE TNTSAT M6 HD |EU| FRANCE TNTSAT M6 FHD |EU| FRANCE TNTSAT PARIS PREMIERE |EU| FRANCE TNTSAT PARIS PREMIERE FULL HD |EU| FRANCE TNTSAT TMC SD |EU| FRANCE TNTSAT TMC HD |EU| FRANCE TNTSAT TMC FULL HD |EU| FRANCE TNTSAT TMC 1 FULL HD |EU| FRANCE TNTSAT 6TER SD |EU| FRANCE TNTSAT 6TER HD |EU| FRANCE TNTSAT 6TER FULL HD |EU| FRANCE TNTSAT CHERIE 25 SD |EU| FRANCE TNTSAT CHERIE 25 |EU| FRANCE TNTSAT CHERIE 25 FULL HD |EU| FRANCE TNTSAT ARTE SD |EU| FRANCE TNTSAT ARTE FR |EU| FRANCE TNTSAT RMC STORY |EU| FRANCE TNTSAT RMC STORY SD |EU| FRANCE TNTSAT ---------- Information ---------- |EU| FRANCE TNTSAT TV5 |EU| FRANCE TNTSAT TV5 MONDE FBS HD |EU| FRANCE TNTSAT CNEWS SD |EU| FRANCE TNTSAT CNEWS |EU| FRANCE TNTSAT CNEWS HD |EU| FRANCE TNTSAT France 24 |EU| FRANCE TNTSAT FRANCE INFO SD |EU| FRANCE TNTSAT FRANCE INFO HD
  • ANNUAL Report : 2005 / Foundation Open Society Institute - Macedonia ; (Editor Marijana Ivanova)

    ANNUAL Report : 2005 / Foundation Open Society Institute - Macedonia ; (Editor Marijana Ivanova)

    Publisher: Foundation Open Society Institute - Macedonia Bul. Jane Sandanski , POB 378 000 Skopje, Republic of Macedonia Tel.: ++3892 2444-488 Fax: ++3892 2444-499 E-mail: [email protected] www.soros.org.mk For the publisher: Vladimir Milcin Editor: Marijana Ivanova Proof Reading: Abakus, Skopje Design, Layout & Print: Koma lab., Skopje Skopje, Republic of Macedonia, 2006 Print run: 500 ISBN 9989-834-92-X CIP - Katalogizacija vo publikacija Nacionalna i univerzitetska biblioteka “Sv. Kliment Ohridski”, Skopje 061.27(497.7)”2005”(047) ANNUAL report : 2005 / Foundation Open Society Institute - Macedonia ; (editor Marijana Ivanova). - Skopje : Foundation Open Society Institute Macedonia, 2006. - 179 str. ; 19 sm Sodr`i i : Annexes ISBN 9989-834-92-X a) Fondacija Institut otvoreno op{testvo Makedonija - 2005 - Izve{tai COBISS.MK-ID 66050058 Institute - Macedonia OpenSociety Foundation Annual Report 2 0 0 5 3 Contents 5 Foreword 7 Contacts and Organizational Set-up 9 Partners and Donors 13 106 Important Events Programs 16 Roma (Inter-program Initiatives) 18 Education Program 26 108 Financial Report Youth Program 34 Information Program 38 132 Annexes Public Health Program 46 133 Annex - Grant Lists Economic Reform Program 52 157 Annex 2 - Consolidated Arts and Culture Program 58 Financial Statements Media Program 64 Public Administration Reform Program 70 Law Program 78 Civil Society Program 84 East-East Program and 96 Other Regional Projects 6 FOREWORD 7 FOSIM IN 2005: LOBBYING, ADVOCATING AND INITIATING CHANGES The year subject of this report is a historic one for the Re- public of Macedonia. It was the year in which the Republic of Macedonia acquired the status of candidate-country for EU membership.
  • Kako Da Komunicirate So Mediumite.Pdf

    Kako Da Komunicirate So Mediumite.Pdf

    Kako da KOMUNICIRATE SO MEDIUMITE Makedonski institut za mediumi za institut Makedonski SODR@INA I DA ZAPO^NEME 6 [1] Mediumska strategija 7 [2] Klu~ni lu|e i resursi 9 [3] Razvivawe na porakata 13 Studija na slu~aj: Vklu~uvawe na zaednicata 19 II ALATKI 24 [1] Soop{tenie za pe~at 25 [2] Konferencija za pe~at 30 [3] Brifing za novinari 35 [4] Poseta za novinari 37 Studija na slu~aj: Vidlivost na va{ata rabota 40 [5] Intervju 43 [6] Ubeduva~ko pismo 46 [7] Mediumski nastani 47 [8] Drugi formi (Bilten, pismo do urednikot) 51 III KOMUNIKACIJA VO USLOVI NA KRIZA 55 [1] Komunikacija vo uslovi na kriza 56 Studija na slu~aj: Komunicirawe za vreme na kriza 58 IV MONITORING I EVALUACIJA 61 [1] Monitoring i evaluacija 62 V DODATOCI: 66 [1] Kodeks na novinarite na Makedonija 67 [2] Poimnik 71 [3] Kontakt informacii za glavnite mediumi vo Makedonija 75 Priznanija i Bibliografija 79 Izdava~: Makedonski institut za mediumi Porta Buwakovec A2/1, 1000 Skopje - Republika Makedonija tel. +389 2 329 8466 faks. +389 2 329 0483 [email protected] www.mim.org.mk Prira~nikot go podgotvija: Marina Tuneva -Jovanovska i Jasmina Mironski Urednik: Sally Broughton Ureduva~ki odbor: • Frances Abouzeid • Biljana Bosiqanova • Vawa Mirkovski • Christa A. Skerry • @aneta Trajkoska Prevod od angliski: Zoran Poposki Lektura i korektura: Hatka Smailovi} Grafi~ki dizajn i pe~atewe: KOMA lab. CIP - Katalogizacija vo publikacija Narodna i univerzitetska biblioteka Sv. Kliment Ohridski, Skopje 316.776(035) TUNEVA-Jovanovska, Marina Kako da komunicirate so mediumite?/ (prira~nikot go podgotvija Marina Tuneva-Jovanovska i Jasmina Mironski; urednik Sally Broughton; prevod od angliski Zoran Poposki).