DOCSLIB.ORG

Archived Discussions Following to Doyen Et Al Failure to Replicate Bargh Chen & Burrows 1996 in Our Annual R

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Archived Discussions Following to Doyen Et Al Failure to Replicate Bargh Chen & Burrows 1996 in Our Annual R Archived discussions following to Doyen et al failure to replicate Bargh Chen & Burrows 1996 Supplementary material for Nelson et al., “Psychology’s Renaissance”, in Annual Review of Psychology. This copy: March 27, 2017 In our Annual Review article on “Psychology’s Renaissance” we refer to an exchange triggered by Doyen et al’s failure to replicate the original article by Bargh et al. Below we have compiled some key exchanges that ensued among the original first author, John Bargh, a science journalist Ed Yong, Nobel Laurette, Danny Kahneman, and social psychologist Norbert Schwarz. In this first page we include an link to the original URLs (when available), a link to the web‐archived copy, and to a .pdf printout of those sites stored in the OSF. All those .pdf files were combined into a single file and presented in the pages that follow. – 0 – 1) John Bargh’s. Psychology Today Blogpost, March 5th, 2012, “Nothing in Their Heads” Note: this blogpost was subsequently deleted, but archived copies are available: Archived copy: http://web.archive.org/web/*/http:/www.psychologytoday.com/blog/the‐natural‐unconscious/201203/nothing‐in‐their‐heads 2nd copy (.pdf): https://osf.io/bgb3c/ 2) Ed Yong. Blogpost in Discover, March 10th, 2012 “A failed replication draws a scathing personal attack from a psychology professor” Original URL: http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/notrocketscience/2012/03/10/failed‐replication‐bargh‐psychology‐study‐doyen Archived copy: http://web.archive.org/web/*/http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/notrocketscience/2012/03/10/failed‐replication‐bargh‐psychology‐study‐doyen 2nd copy (.pdf): https://osf.io/esgdh/ 3) Danny Kahneman’s open letter, September 26 2012, as made available in Decision Science News (a blog hosted by Dan Goldstein) Original: http://www.decisionsciencenews.com/2012/10/05/kahneman‐on‐the‐storm‐of‐doubts‐surrounding‐social‐priming‐research Archived copy: http://web.archive.org/web/*/http://www.decisionsciencenews.com/2012/10/05/kahneman‐on‐the‐storm‐of‐doubts‐surrounding‐social‐priming‐ research/ 2nd copy: 4) Ed Yong. Nature News. October 3rd, 2012. “Nobel laureate challenges psychologists to clean up their act” Original url: http://www.nature.com/news/nobel‐laureate‐challenges‐psychologists‐to‐clean‐up‐their‐act‐1.11535 Archived copy: http://web.archive.org/web/*/http://www.nature.com/news/nobel‐laureate‐challenges‐psychologists‐to‐clean‐up‐their‐act‐1.11535 2nd copy (.pdf) https://osf.io/gcske/ 5) Norbert Schwarz. Response to Ed Young’s questions, October 2nd 2012. Posted on Google Docs. Original url: https://docs.google.com/document/pub?id=1KKN5Gz35CPz6QmtpJ7‐cIwdLG_zeceuu67WRmlE6U8A Archived copy (.pdf): https://osf.io/v3435/ Nothing in Their Heads | Psychology Today http://web.archive.org/web/20120307100648/http://www.psychologytoda... A narcissist will almost certainly look good in public but infuriate you in private. Mark Banschick, M.D. Home Find a Therapist Topic Streams Get Help Magazine Tests Psych Basics Experts Previous Post Automaticity in cognition, motivation, and emotion. Does Kanye West by John A. Bargh, Ph.D. believe in free will? Yes and no... Nothing in Their Heads Debunking the Doyen et al. claims regarding the elderly-priming study Subscribe to The Natural Unconscious Published on March 5, 2012 by John A. Bargh, Ph.D. in The Natural Unconscious Subscribe via RSS Welcome back to "The Natural Unconscious," which returns after a hiatus of a couple years. Why we went underground for awhile is a topic for a later post; we'll get to that soon. John Bargh is Professor of Psychology and Cognitive Science at Yale University. Scientific integrity in the era of pay-as-you-go publications and superficial online science more... journalism. What prompts the return of the blog is a recent article titled "Behavioral Priming: It's All in the Mind, but Whose Mind?" by Stéphane Doyen, Olivier Klein, Cora-Lise Pichon, and Axel Cleeremans. The researchers reported that they could not replicate our lab's 1996 finding that priming (subtly activating in the minds of our college-age experimental participants, without their awareness) the stereotype of the elderly caused participants to walk more slowly when leaving the experiment. We had predicted this effect based on emerging theory and evidence that perceptual mental representations were intimately linked with behavioral representations, a finding that is very well The Natural Unconscious established now in the field (see below). Following their failure to replicate, Doyen et al. went on to show that if the experimenter knew the hypothesis of the study, they were able to then find the effect. Their conclusion was that experimenter expectancies or awareness of the research hypotheses had Debunking the Doyen et al. claims regarding the elderly-priming therefore produced the effect in our original 1996 study as well—in other words, that there was no study actual unconscious stereotype effect on the participants' behavior. One's belief in free will goes missing The Doyen et al. article appeared in an online journal, PLoS ONE, which in the face of others' disapproval Related Articles quite obviously does not receive the usual high scientific journal standards Experimental of peer-review scrutiny (keep reading for the evidence of this); instead, the One reason the public needs to know Philosophy Month journal follows a "business model" in which authors pay to have their about limits to their free will To Ignore or Confront? Dealing with Racially articles published (at a hefty $1,350 per article). The journal promises a Stereotyping "rigorous peer review" for technical soundness but not as to the What I think about what he thinks I Comments importance of the finding. On their website PLoS dismisses the use of think The Greater Good: Psychology and Social knowledgable editors to oversee what gets published and what does not, Policy claiming this adds only a subjective element to the acceptance decision The debate itself, the newsletter articles, and now the blogs Sneaky Commercials: that can be biased against new research directions. But knowledgeable The Unconscious Way editors also can prevent articles from being published based on faulty peer TV Makes You Eat Why Personal Science reviews, such as by inexpert, lazy, or biased reviewers. Expert editors also is a Good Idea know the relevant theory and past research in a given domain, and also know of common methodological pitfalls that inexpert researchers in the domain—such as, apparently, Doyen et al. (keep reading)—can fall prey to. Most Read Most Emailed Find a Therapist 1 Teasing and Bullying, Boys and The lack of rigorous expert editorial scrutiny by PLoS in the Doyen et al. Girls Search for a mental case means that I must supply it here, only after it has been published. If by Nancy Darling, Ph.D. health professional near you. I'd been asked to review it (oddly for an article that purported to fail to replicate one of my past studies, I wasn't) I could have pointed out at that 2 How Your Greatest Insecurities time the technical flaws, though these might not have mattered to PLoS Reveal Your Deepest Gifts by Ken Page, L.C.S.W. ONE—as a for-profit enterprise, PLoS published 14,000 articles in the year 2011 alone. Fourteen thousand. Something tells me they don't turn down 3 What Makes A True Friend many $1,350 checks... by Alex Lickerman, M.D. Although the essentially self-published nature of the Doyen et al. article is bad enough, the misleading conclusions it drew were made even worse by 4 The How and Why of 100 Years of the publicity given to them by some online science-journalism blogs, one of Happiness Find Local: which posted about the Doyen et al. failure with the title "Primed by by Howard S. Friedman, Ph.D. Acupuncturists expectations: Why a classic psychology experiment isn't what it seemed". Chiropractors So as you have read this far, and are therefore a reader interested in 5 What Nonbelievers Believe Massage Therapists by David Niose Dentists psychological science, I'd like (and apparently need) to set the record and more! straight. There are two main reasons why the Doyen et al. conclusions, and those 1 of 3 3/27/2017 11:33 AM Nothing in Their Heads | Psychology Today http://web.archive.org/web/20120307100648/http://www.psychologytoda... in science journalism blogs that swallowed their conclusions whole, are Clos 36 captumisleading and false. The first is that in our original 1996 research the 7 7 Mar 12 -experim 28 Dec 16 e 201120122013 Help experimental condition of the participant and did not even collect the main dependent variable of walking time down the hall. Thus there is no way in our original 1996 studies that the effects could have been produced by Are You with the Right Mate? It is natural to wonder if your partner experimenter expectations. The second is that Doyen et al. did not follow is the right one for you. our original procedure (which is what one must do when attempting to MORE FROM THIS ISSUE replicate a study) but instead made critical changes that are known (in social psychology, which is not Doyen et al's field of specialization) to ISSUE ARCHIVES eliminate the stereotype-behavior effect. I'll take these points one at a time. SUBSCRIBE 1. The experimenter was entirely blind to hypotheses and participants' experimental conditions in the 1996 elderly-priming study. As recounted elsewhere, when we designed and ran the elderly stereotype priming studies (actually, back in 1991), we had solid theoretical reasons to hypothesize the effects we did obtain. But we were very careful to make sure that experimenter bias could not cause the effect. The experimenter who ran the participants in the study was blind to the study hypotheses, and all he did was to greet the participants and give them an envelope.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Book Spring 2006.Qxd
    Why? Recent psychological research sheds new light on this issue. A growing number of experiments show that judgments of beauty and judgments of truth share a common Norbert Schwarz characteristic: People make them, in part, by attending to the dynamics of on judgments of their own information processing. truth & beauty When an object is easy to perceive, people evaluate it as more beautiful Downloaded from http://direct.mit.edu/daed/article-pdf/135/2/136/1829119/daed.2006.135.2.136.pdf by guest on 27 September 2021 than when it is dif½cult to perceive; similarly, when a statement is easy to process, people are more likely to ac- cept it as true than when it is dif½cult to process. Psychologists refer to the ease or dif½culty of information pro- cessing as ‘processing fluency.’ Its shared role in judgments of beauty and Poets and scientists alike often assume truth renders it likely that we ½nd the that beauty and truth are two sides of same stimulus beautiful as well as true. the same coin.* From John Keats’s fa- In an influential series of experiments, mous assertion that “beauty is truth, Robert Zajonc observed in the 1960s that truth beauty” to Richard Feynman’s the more often his participants saw un- belief that “you can recognize truth known graphical stimuli, like Chinese by its beauty and simplicity,” beauty ideographs, the more appealing they has often been offered as a heuristic found them. Later research traced this for assessing truth. Yet the history of ½nding to the role of processing fluen- science is full of beautiful theories cy.
    [Show full text]
  • Curriculum Vitae Julie Y. Huang
    CURRICULUM VITAE JULIE Y. HUANG College of Business Office: Harriman 319 Stony Brook University Email: [email protected] Stony Brook, NY 11794-3775 APPOINTMENTS Associate Professor of Marketing, 2020-present College of Business, Stony Brook University Assistant Professor of Marketing, College of Business, Stony Brook University 2014-2020 Post-Doctoral Fellow and Lab Manager, 2011-2014 Rotman School of Management, University of Toronto EDUCATION Ph.D. Yale University, Social Psychology 2011 M.S. Yale University, Social Psychology 2007 B.A. University of Maryland, Psychology and English 2003 AWARDS, HONORS, AND GRANTS Stony Brook Trustees Faculty Award, $20 000, Stony Brook Foundation 2019 Transformative Consumer Research Grant, $2025, Association for Consumer Research 2019 Elected Member, Society for Experimental Social Psychology 2017 NCID Exemplary Diversity Scholar, University of Michigan 2011 Finalist, Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Health & Society Scholars 2010 Fellowship, Summer Institute in Social Psychology 2009 Phillip G. Zimbardo Dissertation Award, Yale University 2008-2009 Graduate Student Travel Grant, Society for Judgment and Decision-Making 2008 National Merit Scholarship 1999-2003 RESEARCH EXPERTISE Goals and Motivation Consumer Behavior Interpersonal Judgments Labor practices Julie Huang August 2021 Curriculum Vitae Page 2 PUBLICATIONS/ARTICLES UNDER REVIEW 1. Huang, Julie Y. (2020), “Unfit by Accident: Third-party Perception of Parental Fitness Based upon Childbearing Intention.” Social Psychological and Personality Science, 11:1, 126-33. 2. Lee, Spike W.S., Julie Y. Huang and Norbert Schwarz (2020), “Risk Overgeneralization in Times of a Contagious Disease Threat,” Frontiers in Psychology, 11:1392. 3. Chan, C.S. Richard, Haemin Dennis Park, Julie Y. Huang and Annaleena Parhankangas (2020), “Less is More? Evidence for a Curvilinear Relationship Between Readability and Screening Evaluations Across Pitch Competition and Crowdfunding Contexts.” Journal of Business Venturing Insights, 14, e00176.
    [Show full text]
  • Recent Advances in the Economics of Individual Subjective Well-Being
    IZA DP No. 4850 Recent Advances in the Economics of Individual Subjective Well-Being Alois Stutzer Bruno S. Frey March 2010 DISCUSSION PAPER SERIES Forschungsinstitut zur Zukunft der Arbeit Institute for the Study of Labor Recent Advances in the Economics of Individual Subjective Well-Being Alois Stutzer University of Basel, CREMA and IZA Bruno S. Frey University of Zurich and CREMA Discussion Paper No. 4850 March 2010 IZA P.O. Box 7240 53072 Bonn Germany Phone: +49-228-3894-0 Fax: +49-228-3894-180 E-mail: [email protected] Any opinions expressed here are those of the author(s) and not those of IZA. Research published in this series may include views on policy, but the institute itself takes no institutional policy positions. The Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA) in Bonn is a local and virtual international research center and a place of communication between science, politics and business. IZA is an independent nonprofit organization supported by Deutsche Post Foundation. The center is associated with the University of Bonn and offers a stimulating research environment through its international network, workshops and conferences, data service, project support, research visits and doctoral program. IZA engages in (i) original and internationally competitive research in all fields of labor economics, (ii) development of policy concepts, and (iii) dissemination of research results and concepts to the interested public. IZA Discussion Papers often represent preliminary work and are circulated to encourage discussion. Citation of such a paper should account for its provisional character. A revised version may be available directly from the author.
    [Show full text]
  • Metacognitive Experiences and the Intricacies of Setting People Straight: Implications for Debiasing and Public Information Campaigns
    METACOGNITIVE EXPERIENCES AND THE INTRICACIES OF SETTING PEOPLE STRAIGHT: IMPLICATIONS FOR DEBIASING AND PUBLIC INFORMATION CAMPAIGNS Norbert Schwarz Lawrence J. Sanna Ian Skurnik Carolyn Yoon I. Introduction Decades of psychological research documented that human judgment often falls short of normative ideals. Social and cognitive psychologists discovered an ever increasing number of systematic biases and illustrated their pervasive role in judgment and decision making (for reviews see Gilovich, GriYn, & Kahneman, 2002; Kahneman, Slovic, & Tversky, 1982; Kerr, MacCoun, & Kramer, 1996; Nisbett & Ross, 1980; Pohl, 2005). Similarly, researchers in applied fields, like health and consumer behavior, identified numerous erro- neous beliefs that impair good decisions and prevent people from doing what would be in their best interest (Christensen, Moran, & Wiebe, 1999; Webley, Burgoyne, Lea, & Young, 2001). In both cases, the remedy seems obvious: If people only thought enough about the issues at hand, considered all the relevant information and employed proper reasoning strategies, their deci- sion making would surely improve. This assumption is at the heart of numerous strategies that attempt to debias human judgment (for a review see Larrick, 2004); it is likewise central to public information campaigns designed to dispel erroneous beliefs and to replace them with more accurate information (for a review see Rice & Atkin, 2001). Unfortunately, these attempts to improve decision making often fail to achieve their goals, even under conditions assumed to foster rational judgment. 127 ADVANCES IN EXPERIMENTAL Copyright 2007, Elsevier Inc. SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, VOL. 39 All rights reserved. DOI: 10.1016/S0065-2601(06)39003-X 0065-2601/07 $35.00 128 NORBERT SCHWARZ et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Association for Consumer Research
    ASSOCIATION FOR CONSUMER RESEARCH Labovitz School of Business & Economics, University of Minnesota Duluth, 11 E. Superior Street, Suite 210, Duluth, MN 55802 Haptic Experiences: a Touching Story of Impression Formation and Decision-Making Joshua Ackerman, MIT, USA Christopher Nocera, Harvard University, USA John Bargh, Yale University, USA Touch exerts powerful and dimension-specific influences on our judgments, even though we are often unaware of these influences. We show that incidental tactile experiences with weight (heaviness), texture (roughness) and malleability (hardness) shape our interpersonal impressions and the decisions we make in consumption domains. [to cite]: Joshua Ackerman, Christopher Nocera, and John Bargh (2011) ,"Haptic Experiences: a Touching Story of Impression Formation and Decision-Making ", in NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 38, eds. Darren W. Dahl, Gita V. Johar, and Stijn M.J. van Osselaer, Duluth, MN : Association for Consumer Research. [url]: http://www.acrwebsite.org/volumes/15996/volumes/v38/NA-38 [copyright notice]: This work is copyrighted by The Association for Consumer Research. For permission to copy or use this work in whole or in part, please contact the Copyright Clearance Center at http://www.copyright.com/. SPECIAL SESSION The ‘Nature’ Of Life: How the Physical World Colors Impressions, Informs Decisions, and Shapes Who We Are Joshua M. Ackerman, MIT Sloan School of Management), USA Lawrence E. Williams, University of Colorado at Boulder, USA EXTENDED ABstract was compensatory behavior for perceptions of low coordination and not due to more cooperative inclinations. “Haptic Experiences: A Touching Story of Impression Malleability: The experience of malleability, or hardness, is Formation and Decision-Making” metaphorically associated with concepts of stability, rigidity and Joshua Ackerman, MIT Sloan School of Management, USA strictness (e.g., “hard-hearted”).
    [Show full text]
  • Bob Zajonc and the Unconscious Emotion ISSN 1754-0739 DOI: 10.1177/1754073910375480 Er.Sagepub.Com
    Emotion Review Vol. 2, No. 4 (October 2010) 353–362 © 2010 SAGE Publications and The International Society for Research on Emotion Bob Zajonc and the Unconscious Emotion ISSN 1754-0739 DOI: 10.1177/1754073910375480 er.sagepub.com Piotr Winkielman Department of Psychology, University of California, San Diego, USA and Warsaw School of Social Psychology, Poland Abstract This article focuses on Bob Zajonc’s views on unconscious emotion, especially in the context of the debates about the independ- ence of affect and cognition. Historically, Bob was always interested in the “mere”—basic, fundamental processes. His empirical demonstrations of precognitive and preconscious emotional processes, combined with his elegant expositions of them, sharply contrasted with cold and complex cognitive models. Interestingly, Bob tended to believe that whereas the causes of emotion can be unconscious, the emotional state itself tends to be conscious. However, he reconsidered this assumption and in his later work showed that subjects in affective priming experiments do not experience conscious affect, but instead act on basic preferences. Today, Bob’s insights continue to inspire research on “unconscious emotion.” Keywords consciousness, emotion, Zajonc The relation between emotion and consciousness interested has not only redirected the field but continues to inspire new Bob Zajonc throughout much of his career. Although he never research and new researchers. wrote a comprehensive treatise on “unconscious emotion,” he often thought and wrote about it. Most directly, Bob addressed The Background of the Idea this issue in a short essay published in the book The Nature of The Mere Emotion: Fundamental Questions edited by Paul Ekman and Richard Davison (1994).
    [Show full text]
  • Answers to the Top 50 Questions About Genesis, Creation, and Noah's Flood
    ANSWERS TO THE TOP 50 QUESTIONS ABOUT GENESIS, CREATION, AND NOAH’S FLOOD Daniel A. Biddle, Ph.D. Copyright © 2018 by Genesis Apologetics, Inc. E-mail: [email protected] www.genesisapologetics.com A 501(c)(3) ministry equipping youth pastors, parents, and students with Biblical answers for evolutionary teaching in public schools. The entire contents of this book (including videos) are available online: www.genesisapologetics.com/faqs Answers to the Top 50 Questions about Genesis, Creation, and Noah’s Flood by Daniel A. Biddle, Ph.D. Printed in the United States of America ISBN-13: 978-1727870305 ISBN-10: 1727870301 All rights reserved solely by the author. The author guarantees all contents are original and do not infringe upon the legal rights of any other person or work. No part of this book may be reproduced in any form without the permission of the author. The views expressed in this book are not necessarily those of the publisher. Scripture taken from the New King James Version®. Copyright © 1982 by Thomas Nelson. Used by permission. All rights reserved. Print Version November 2019 Dedication To my wife, Jenny, who supports me in this work. To my children Makaela, Alyssa, Matthew, and Amanda, and to your children and your children’s children for a hundred generations—this book is for all of you. We would like to acknowledge Answers in Genesis (www.answersingenesis.org), the Institute for Creation Research (www.icr.org), and Creation Ministries International (www.creation.com). Much of the content herein has been drawn from (and is meant to be in alignment with) these Biblical Creation ministries.
    [Show full text]
  • The Open Notebook’S Pitch Database Includes Dozens of Successful Pitch Letters for Science Stories
    Selected Readings Prepared for the AAAS Mass Media Science & Engineering Fellows, May 2012 All contents are copyrighted and may not be used without permission. Table of Contents INTRODUCTION PART ONE: FINDING IDEAS 1. Lost and found: How great non-fiction writers discover great ideas—In this topical feature, TON guest contributor Brendan Borrell interviews numerous science writers about how they find ideas. (The short answer: In the darndest places.) 2. Ask TON: Saving string—Writers and editors provide advice on gathering ideas for feature stories. 3. Ask TON: From idea to story—Four experienced science writers share the questions they ask themselves when weighing whether a story idea is viable. 4. Ask TON: Finding international stories—Six well-traveled science writers share their methods for sussing out international stories. PART TWO: PITCHING 5. Ask TON: How to pitch—In this interview, writers and editors dispense advice on elements of a good pitch letter. 6. Douglas Fox recounts an Antarctic adventure—Doug Fox pitched his Antarctica story to numerous magazines, unsuccessfully, before finding a taker just before leaving on the expedition he had committed to months before. After returning home, that assignment fell through, and Fox pitched it one more time—to Discover, who bought the story. In this interview, Fox describes the lessons he learned in the pitching process; he also shares his pitch letters, both unsuccessful and successful (see links). 7. Pitching errors: How not to pitch—In this topical feature, Smithsonian editor Laura Helmuth conducts a roundtable conversation with six other editors in which they discuss how NOT to pitch.
    [Show full text]
  • Processing Fluency and Aesthetic Pleasure: Is Beauty in the Perceiver’S Processing Experience?
    Personality and Social Psychology Review Copyright © 2004 by 2004, Vol. 8, No. 4, 364–382 Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc. Processing Fluency and Aesthetic Pleasure: Is Beauty in the Perceiver’s Processing Experience? Rolf Reber Department of Psychosocial Science University of Bergen, Norway Norbert Schwarz Department of Psychology and Institute for Social Research University of Michigan Piotr Winkielman Department of Psychology University of California, San Diego We propose that aesthetic pleasure is a function of the perceiver’s processing dynam- ics: The more fluently perceivers can process an object, the more positive their aes- thetic response. We review variables known to influence aesthetic judgments, such as figural goodness, figure–ground contrast, stimulus repetition, symmetry, and pro- totypicality, and trace their effects to changes in processing fluency. Other variables that influence processing fluency, like visual or semantic priming, similarly increase judgments of aesthetic pleasure. Our proposal provides an integrative framework for the study of aesthetic pleasure and sheds light on the interplay between early prefer- ences versus cultural influences on taste, preferences for both prototypical and ab- stracted forms, and the relation between beauty and truth. In contrast to theories that trace aesthetic pleasure to objective stimulus features per se, we propose that beauty is grounded in the processing experiences of the perceiver, which are in part a func- tion of stimulus properties. What is beauty? What makes for a beautiful face, kiewicz, 1970). This objectivist view inspired many appealing painting, pleasing design, or charming scen- psychological attempts to identify the critical contrib- ery? This question has been debated for at least 2,500 utors to beauty.
    [Show full text]
  • Heuristics and Biases the Psychology of Intuitive Judgment. In
    P1: FYX/FYX P2: FYX/UKS QC: FCH/UKS T1: FCH CB419-Gilovich CB419-Gilovich-FM May 30, 2002 12:3 HEURISTICS AND BIASES The Psychology of Intuitive Judgment Edited by THOMAS GILOVICH Cornell University DALE GRIFFIN Stanford University DANIEL KAHNEMAN Princeton University iii P1: FYX/FYX P2: FYX/UKS QC: FCH/UKS T1: FCH CB419-Gilovich CB419-Gilovich-FM May 30, 2002 12:3 published by the press syndicate of the university of cambridge The Pitt Building, Trumpington Street, Cambridge, United Kingdom cambridge university press The Edinburgh Building, Cambridge CB2 2RU, UK 40 West 20th Street, New York, NY 10011-4211, USA 477 Williamstown, Port Melbourne, VIC 3207, Australia Ruiz de Alarcon´ 13, 28014, Madrid, Spain Dock House, The Waterfront, Cape Town 8001, South Africa http://www.cambridge.org C Cambridge University Press 2002 This book is in copyright. Subject to statutory exception and to the provisions of relevant collective licensing agreements, no reproduction of any part may take place without the written permission of Cambridge University Press. First published 2002 Printed in the United States of America Typeface Palatino 9.75/12.5 pt. System LATEX2ε [TB] A catalog record for this book is available from the British Library. Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication data Heuristics and biases : the psychology of intuitive judgment / edited by Thomas Gilovich, Dale Griffin, Daniel Kahneman. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 0-521-79260-6 – ISBN 0-521-79679-2 (pbk.) 1. Judgment. 2. Reasoning (Psychology) 3. Critical thinking. I. Gilovich, Thomas. II. Griffin, Dale III. Kahneman, Daniel, 1934– BF447 .H48 2002 153.4 – dc21 2001037860 ISBN 0 521 79260 6 hardback ISBN 0 521 79679 2 paperback iv P1: FYX/FYX P2: FYX/UKS QC: FCH/UKS T1: FCH CB419-Gilovich CB419-Gilovich-FM May 30, 2002 12:3 Contents List of Contributors page xi Preface xv Introduction – Heuristics and Biases: Then and Now 1 Thomas Gilovich and Dale Griffin PART ONE.
    [Show full text]
  • Social Psychological Approaches to Consciousness
    P1: KAE 0521857430c20 CUFX049/Zelazo 0 521 85743 0 printer: cupusbw November 6, 2006 15:55 F. Anthropology/Social Psychology of Consciousness 551 P1: KAE 0521857430c20 CUFX049/Zelazo 0 521 85743 0 printer: cupusbw November 6, 2006 15:55 552 P1: KAE 0521857430c20 CUFX049/Zelazo 0 521 85743 0 printer: cupusbw November 6, 2006 15:55 CHAPTER 20 Social Psychological Approaches to Consciousness John A. Bargh Abstract any given phenomenon. However, because these studies focus on the relative influence A central focus of contemporary social psy- of both conscious and automatic processes, chology has been the relative influence there has been a strong influence within of external (i.e., environmental, situational) social psychology of dual-process models versus internal (i.e., personality, attitudes) that capture these distinctions (e.g., inten- forces in determining social judgment and tional versus unintentional, effortful versus social behavior. But many of the classic find- efficient, aware versus unaware). Another ings in the field – such as Milgram’s obe- reason that dual-process models became dience research, Asch’s conformity studies, popular in social psychology is that the dis- and Zimbardo’s mock-prison experiment – tinction nicely captured an important truth seemed to indicate that the external forces about social cognition and behavior: that swamped the internal ones when the chips people seem to process the identical social were down. Where in the social psycholog- information differently depending on its rel- ical canon was the evidence showing the evance or centrality to their important goals internal, intentional, rational control of one’s and purposes. own behavior? Interestingly, most models of a given phenomenon in social psychol- ogy have started with the assumption of a Introduction major mediational role played by conscious choice and intentional guidance of judg- Historically, social psychology has been con- ment and behavior processes.
    [Show full text]
  • Q&A with Ed Yong
    Q&A with Ed Yong Interviewed by Susan Straight This is Susan Straight, editor of Dimensions magazine and I’m here at the ASTC conference with Ed Yong, our keynote speaker from this morning. Ed Yong is an award-winning science writer for The Atlantic magazine. His work has appeared in National Geographic, the New Yorker, Wired, Nature, New Scientist, and Scientific American. He is originally from the United Kindgom but currently lives in Washington, D.C. His 2016 book, I Contain Multitudes: The Microbes Within Us, was a New York Times bestseller. He spoke at the ASTC 2018 conference about gender inequities in science and his own work to recognize and support women in science. You speak to audiences in which there are occasionally people who are a bit hostile to some of your ideas. How do you use humor in those situations? Science can be quite a difficult and obtuse topic to talk about. Anything that gets people to connect with emotions that are universal—regardless of the topic you’re talking about—is great, which is why I use humor and storytelling. The best way to make people care about things they might not care about is by getting them to connect on that very deep, visceral, emotional level, by feeling things with you, by laughing with you, by sympathizing with stories of successes or failures or triumphs or quests. And I think that is at the heart of this idea of telling stories about science, whether it’s creating exhibits or writing news pieces. We can trigger that sense of shared empathy through those means.
    [Show full text]