FORT SISSETON Vvj STATE PAR J

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

FORT SISSETON Vvj STATE PAR J { FORT SISSETON vvJ STATE PAR J rarr.N.S.C. HISTORY AND TOUR GUIDE NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORICAL PLACES SOUTH DAKOTA DEPARTMENT OF GAME. FISH AND PARKS DivISIon of Parks and Recreation NOrl h Dakota .,_ . _ ._- -- - -. _ . _ ., _ . South Dak ota 25 HISTORY OF FORT SISSETON ort Sisseton, a military outpost for 25 years, stands as a F reminder of the conflicts between Indians and settlers on the western frontier The fort was established in 1864 to provide military protection of settlers in this new region. In 1862, some bands of Santee Sioux living along the Minnesota River, a short distance east of here, rebelled because 01 unfair trading practices, unkept treaty promises, and because settlers were homesteading their lands. This uprising, led by Chief Little Crow, raged for five months. There were nearly 1,000 casualties and loss of homes and possessions for many more thousands during the uprising. It created panic on the frontier Settlements were abandoned to await the arrival of the military to secure the region. The tragedy ended with the conviction and execution of the ringleaders. Many Indians, whether or not they participated in the outbreak, fled in fear westward into Dakota Territory. Gen. John Pope, commander of the Military Department of the Northwest, headquartered at Milwaukee, Wisconsin, proposed a series of forts, with patrols between these forts, as the best defense against further conflicts on the frontier Pope's Dakota campaign plan was to "sweep the region now occupied by hostile Indians north of a line from Fort Pierre to Fort Abercrombie." General Pope assigned one of his field generals, Henry H. Sibley, to head this assignment. After completing the "sweep," Sibley was to establish two forts, one near Devils Lake, 160 miles north of here, and another on the James River, 40 miles west of here. The latter fort was to be called Fort Wadsworth. Sibley, a trader with more than 20 years experience in the West before being called to military service, made a counter recommendation to General Pope. He suggested the head of the Coteau des Prairies (hills of the prairie) area as a fort site instead of the James River site. He thought the 600-foot rise above the plains could control the access to Lake Traverse, Big Stone Lake, and the Minnesota River valley. Sibley considered the Devil's Lake post unnecessary Many of the soldiers in Pope's command were ordered to fight in the Civil War, and Pope had too few men left to garrison a fort at Devil's Lake. Pope continued to insist on the fort site on the James River until a 1 CHIEF LITTLE CROW "T', _ C),!...(o:~ (" Itt ,., .. Cr· ..... • SAMUEL J. BROWN COL HENRY H SIBLEY 2 detachment of Sibley's command under Maj . John Clowney confirmed Sibley's report of the lack of timber on the James. After investigating the head of the prairie hills, Clowney selected this site on the south side of the Kettle Lakes for the fort. At the time, water in the chain of lakes surrounded the fort site, allowing passage only from the south. Clowney was convinced the site was good because of its natural defenses, the abundance of lake water for drinking, the thick stands of trees on the lakeshore, and other natural resources. On August 1, 1864, he sent a messgae to his headquarters which ended, "I have today located Fort Wadsworth." The reservation was ultimately 9 by 15 miles and contained 82,000 acres. Horses were considered as valuable as men for survival on the frontier, and the first building constructed was a log stable with a roof of North Dakota Minnesota • F f L incoln • FI, Yo/~ s South Dakota eFt. Meod~ -Fl. S ully - Fl. Ridgley • Fl. P,erre branches and slough grass. Within two months, a mule-powered steam sawmill was in operation. By 1866 the unit had been replaced by a 20- horsepower steam sawmill. The lime and fine clay for making bricks and an abundance of field stone for building purposes were some of the natural resources that impressed Major Clowney These materials may be seen in the beautiful stonework and uniquely colored brick structures that were built to replace the unhewed log facilities. The light coloring of the bricks is caused by an absence of iron in the clay. Part of Sibley's command was a group of Indian scouts led by Joseph R. Brown, chief of scouts. Brown, like Sibley, was well acquainted in the vicinity He had operated area trading post~ and had earned the confidence and friendship of the Sisseton-Wahpeton Indians. He located his scout headquarters about one mile east of Fort Sisseton. Shortly after establishing scout headquarters, Joseph R. Brown secured an appointment as the first sutler, or trader, at Fort Wadsworth. 3 He built his trading post near the east entrance of the sod breastworks and ditch that enclose the lO-acre fort grounds. In 1866 he moved the 20- by 50-foot log headquarters to Browns Valley, Minnesota. Today it serves as a museum for some of the Brown family artifacts. Samuel J Brown was the son of Joseph R. Brown who had married a Sisseton. In 1866, Sam rode into history alongside other heroes of Meat from the anteiope hangs beside the tent to dry at this Fort Sisseton Indian scout camp. Twenty such outposts served as early warning stations for the fort. frontier America. As chief of scouts, he rode 120 miles in a snowstorm to alert an outpost of an impending attack by hostile Indians. The ride left him paralyzed. Sam Brown retired to his father's log house in Browns Valley to spend his remaining years. The event is recalled on panels in the post museum. There were about 20 outlying scout camps that served as warning stations for Fort Wadsworth. Each camp was manned by several Indian scouts and their families. The scouts proved to be brave and loyal soldiers. Some of their field experiences are recalled on panels in the fort's museum. Perhaps the greatest threat to peace in the area was created in the late 1870's by a band of Yanktonais Sioux led by Chief Joseph Drifting Goose. The chief and his roving band drew supplies from the reservation at Fort Thompson on the Missouri River during the winter months. In the spring, he would move his band to the Armadale Island area on the James River From this village site he could visit his friend Gabriel Renville, chief of the Sissetons,and would draw rations from the Sisseton Agency, east of Fort Sisseton. This nomadic band caused some concern to the garrison at Fort Sisseton, for they often harassed surveyors and settlers who trespassed on lands bordering the James River 4 In 1879, President Rutherford B. Hayes declared three townships of the James River as the Drifting Goose Reservation. One year later, the chief was allowed concessions to move his band to Fort Thompson, ending the last barrier to white settlement. Fort Wadsworth's name was changed to Fort Sisseton in 1876 because of the nearby village of Sisseton Indians and because the army discovered it had named another fort on Long Island, New York, Fort Wadsworth. Age, weather and the sometimes hasty construction were beginning to show on the fort's buildings. Several severe storms had damaged some structures beyond repair A 1873 windstorm with near-hurricane force broke more than 1,200 windows, ripped roofs from several buildings, and caused walls to collapse. Some repairs to the garrison were never made. By the mid-1870's, railroads were beginning to move into Dakota Territory, bringing scores of new settlers. The discovery of gold in the Black Hills by the Custer Expedition in 1874 and the conflict at Little Big Horn two years later quickly focused attention to this new western frontier The continued need for a facility like Fort Sisseton seemed remote. In a report in 1878, Capt. Clarence E. Bennett reported the water level in the chain of lakes surrounding the fort had dropped 12 feet in the past 12 years. He blamed the drop to the loss of trees that had been cut for lumber and fuel or destroyed by frequent prairie fires. The trees caught and held winter snows to fill the lakes with fresh water in the spring. A lower lake level exaggerated the drinking water problem at the post. The alkaline water became unpalatable during the hot summer and the The row of cabins occupied by married soldiers was called Suds ville because many of the wives washed clothes for the garrison. This photo was taken about 1870. 5 troops had to rely on melted ice, cut from the lakes during the winter, for drinking. To add to these problems, putrid odors occurred from Hampson's Lake to the south of the post and the shallow pond to the west. The ground around the quarters became saturated with human waste from the nearby pit sinks (toilets) because no sewage disposal had been provided when the fort was built. But in spite of these conditions and the isolation of the post, frequent prairie fires, hot summers and severe winters, a doctor at the fort reported the general health of the men at the garrison was good. The fort was abandoned as a military outpost in 1889 after 25 years of operation. On June 1 the fort's last commander, Capt. Joe Hale, closed the fort. The post had served the purpose for which it was established. Its presence had assured a peaceful settlement of this region of Dakota Territory On November 2, 1889, South Dakota gained statehood.
Recommended publications
  • Comprehensive Historic Preservation Plan Was Written in 2009
    NORTH DAKOTA STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICE ARCHAEOLOGY AND HISTORIC PRESERVATION DIVISION STATE HISTORICAL SOCIETY OF NORTH DAKOTA 612 EAST BOULEVARD AVENUE BISMARCK, NORTH DAKOTA 58505-0830 PRESERVATION IN NORTH DAKOTA, 2016-2021: A Statewide Comprehensive Plan PRESERVATION IN NORTH DAKOTA, 2016-2021: Telephone: (701) 328-2672 FAX: (701) 328-3710 http://history.nd.gov HISTORIC December 2015 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS: The preparation of this plan revision was a group effort. Research, discussion, writing and reviews were performed primarily by the staff of the State Historic Preservation Office, sitting as an ad hoc planning committee and by other individuals from the staff of the State Historical Society of North Dakota, each bringing his or her own perspective, expertise, experience and philosophical viewpoints, to help formulate a comprehensive yet balanced preservation concept. Preservation constituents and respondents from the general public gave time and generously contributed ideas, evaluations, suggestions, concerns, and assessments. To each and all of these sincere gratitude is offered, as it is to previous staff and public participants whose contributions to earlier planning studies and efforts were of great value to the development of this plan. This document may be provided in other communication formats. If special format copies are desired, please contact: The Division of Archaeology and Historic Preservation State Historical Society of North Dakota 612 East Boulevard Avenue Bismarck, North Dakota 58505 Telephone: (701) 328-2672 Fax: (701) 328-3710 http://history.nd.gov The State Historical Society of North Dakota receives federal funds from the U. S. Department of the Interior, National Park Service, to assist with costs of administering the Historic Preservation program in this state.
    [Show full text]
  • Dakota Conflict of 1862
    A Guide to the Microfilm Edition of DAKOTA CONFLICT OF 1862 MANUSCRIPT COLLECTIONS DAKOTA CONFLICT OF 1862 MANUSCRIPT COLLECTIONS Microfilmed by the Minnesota Historical Society Library and Archives, M582, Dakota Conflict of 1862, Manuscript Collections, 1862-1962 Project Coordinator Martin Schipper Guide compiled by Dale Reynolds and Robert E. Lester Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Dakota Conflict of 1862 [microform]: manuscript collections/project coordinator, Martin Schipper. microfilm reels. Summary: Reproduces 144 small collections of letters, reminiscences, reports, diaries, and related materials dealing with Minnesota's Dakota Conflict and related events of 1862-1865. "Microfilmed by the Minnesota Historial Society Library and Archives, M582, Dakota Conflict of 1862, Manuscript Collections, 1862-1962." Accompanied by a printed guide compiled by Robert E. Lester, entitled: A guide to the microfilm edition ofDakota conflict of 1862. ISBN 1-55655-855-4 1. Dakota Indians--Wars, 1862-1865--Sources. 2. Indians of North America--Minnesota River Valley(S.D. and Minn.)--Wars, 1862-1865--Sources. I. Schipper, Martin Paul. II. Lester, Robert. III. Minnesota Historical Society. Division of Library and Archives. IV. University Publications of America (Firm) V. Title: Guide to the microfilm edition of Dakota conflict of 1862. E99.D1 973.7--dc21 2002019988 CIP TABLE OF CONTENTS Scope and Content Note v Source Note vii Reel Index Reel 1 "Anderson"-"Grose" 1 Reel 2 "Hagadorn"-"Myers" 7 Reel 3 "Nairn"-"Wood" 15 Reel 4 "Workman"-"Wounded Man" 23 Subj ect Index 25 SCOPE AND CONTENT NOTE In 1862, Minnesota was still a young state, part of a frontier inhabited by more than one million Indians.
    [Show full text]
  • Minnesota Red River Trails
    NPS Form 10-900-b 0MB No, 7024-0078 (Jan 1987) ' ^ n >. •• ' M United States Department of the Interior j ; j */i i~i U i_J National Park Service National Register of Historic Places 41990' Multiple Property Documentation Form NATIONAL REGISTER This form is for use in documenting multiple property groups relating to one or several historic contexts. See instructions in Guidelines for Completing National Register Forms (National Register Bulletin 16). Complete each item by marking "x" in the appropriate box or by entering the requested information. For additional space use continuation sheets (Form 10-900-a). Type all entries. A. Name of Multiple Property Listing_______________________________________ Minnesota Red River Trails B. Associated Historic Contexts Minnesota Red River Trails, 1835-1871 C. Geographical Data State of Minnesota I | See continuation sheet D. Certification As the designated authority under the Nal ional Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as amended, I hereby certify that this documentation form meets the National R< gister documentation standards and sets forth requirements for the listing of related ^fo^r^e&-^r\^^r(l \feith the Natii nal Register criteria. This submission meets the procedural and professional requirerrlents^eftirfn in 36 GnWFari 6Q~ tftd-the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Planning and Evaluation. rJ it fft> Sigriature or certifying official I an R. Stewart Date / / __________________Deputy State-Historic Preservation Officer State or Federal agency and bureau ,,. , , Minnesota Historical Society 1, herebAcertify that this multiple property documentation form has been approved by the National Register as a basis for evaluating related properties for listing in the National Register.
    [Show full text]
  • The War with the Sioux: Norwegians Against Indians 1862-1863 Translation of Karl Jakob Skarstein Krigen Mot Siouxene: Nordmenn Mot Indianerne 1862-1863
    University of North Dakota UND Scholarly Commons Digital Press Books The Digital Press at the University of North Dakota 2015 The aW r with the Sioux Karl Jakob Skarstein Follow this and additional works at: https://commons.und.edu/press-books Recommended Citation Skarstein, Karl Jakob, "The aW r with the Sioux" (2015). Digital Press Books. 3. https://commons.und.edu/press-books/3 This Book is brought to you for free and open access by the The Digital Press at the University of North Dakota at UND Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Digital Press Books by an authorized administrator of UND Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE WAR WITH THE SIOUX: NORWEGIANS AGAINST INDIANS 1862-1863 Translation of Karl Jakob Skarstein Krigen mot siouxene: nordmenn mot indianerne 1862-1863. Copyright © 2015 by The Digital Press at The University of North Dakota Norwegian edition published by Spartacus Forlag AS, Oslo © Spartacus Forlag AS 2008 Published by Agreement with Hagen Agency, Oslo “Translators’ Preface” by Danielle Mead Skjelver; “Historical Introduction” by Richard Rothaus, “Becoming American: A Brief Historiography of Norwegian and Native Interactions” by Melissa Gjellstad, and “The Apple Creek Fight and Killdeer Mountain Conflict Remembered” by Dakota Goodhouse, are available with a CC-By 4.0 license. The translation of this work was funded with generous support from a NORLA: Norwegian Literature Abroad grant. www.norla.no The book is set in Janson Font by Linotype except for Dakota Goodhouse’s contribution which is set in Times New Roman.
    [Show full text]
  • History of North Dakota Chapter 6
    The Beginnings of Settlements 109 CHAPTER 6 The Beginnings of Settlement THE FIRST PORTION OF NORTH DAKOTA to be settled was the valley of the Red River of the North. Except for the Selkirk colonists and the metis about Pembina, agricultural settlement came with the advance of the American frontier. When restless farmers, seeking cheap land, had taken over southern Minnesota, they turned next to the fertile lands of the Red River Valley. Their coming was stimulated by the opening of a new transportation system. Remoteness was a crucial problem at the Selkirk settlement. Its people, métis and white, wanted easy access to outside markets. At first they were supplied by way of Hudson Bay, but that was costly and the Hudson's Bay Company itself sought a cheaper route. St. Paul, more accessible than the Bay, wanted to make the Selkirk colony its commercial hinterland. When the cheaper route to the Selkirk settlement by way of St. Paul won out over the more costly one by way of the Bay, the valley of the Red River became a trade route. Cart trails, the steamboat line, and then the railroad ran through it. These opened the portion of the valley south of the international boundary and brought in settlers. The process advanced in three steps. The first as the growth of the metis settlement at Pembina and St. Joseph. There the metis had freer access both to St. Paul and to the buffalo herds on the American side of the boundary. The Pembina-St. Joseph settlement was also an American 110 History of North Dakota gateway to the Selkirk colony to the north.
    [Show full text]
  • Red River Trails
    Red River Trails by Grace Flandrau ------... ----,. I' , I 1 /7 Red River Trails by Grace Flandrau Compliments of the Great Northern Railway The Red River of the North Red River Trails by Grace Flandrau Foreword There is a certain hay meadow in southwestern Minnesota; curiously enough this low-lying bit of prairie, often entirely submerged, happens to be an important height of land dividing the great water sheds of Hudson's Bay and Mississippi riv,er. I t lies between two lakes: One of these, the Big Stone, gives rise to the Minnesota river, whose waters slide down the long tobog­ gan of the Mississippi Valley to the Gulf of Mexico; from the other, Lake Traverse, flows the Bois de Sioux, a main tributary of the Red River of the North, which descends for over five. hundred miles through one of the richest valleys in the world to Lake Winnipeg and eventually to Hudson's Bay. In the dim geologic past, the melting of a great glacier ground up limestone and covered this valley with fertile deposits, while the glacial Lake Agassiz subsequently levelled it to a vast flat plain. Occasionally in spring when the rivers are exceptionally high, the meadow is flooded and becomes a lake. Then a boatman, travelling southward from the semi-arctic Hudson's Bay, could float over the divide and reach the Gulf of Mexico entirely by water route. The early travellers gave, romantic names to the rive.rs of the West, none more so, it seems to me, than Red River of the North, 3 with its lonely cadence, its suggestion of evening and the cry of wild birds in far off quiet places.
    [Show full text]
  • Minnesota Bounties on Dakota Men During the U.S.-Dakota War Colette Routel Mitchell Hamline School of Law, [email protected]
    Mitchell Hamline School of Law Mitchell Hamline Open Access Faculty Scholarship 2013 Minnesota Bounties On Dakota Men During The U.S.-Dakota War Colette Routel Mitchell Hamline School of Law, [email protected] Publication Information 40 William Mitchell Law Review 1 (2013) Repository Citation Routel, Colette, "Minnesota Bounties On Dakota Men During The .SU .-Dakota War" (2013). Faculty Scholarship. Paper 260. http://open.mitchellhamline.edu/facsch/260 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Mitchell Hamline Open Access. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Scholarship by an authorized administrator of Mitchell Hamline Open Access. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Minnesota Bounties On Dakota Men During The .SU .-Dakota War Abstract The .SU .-Dakota War was one of the formative events in Minnesota history, and despite the passage of time, it still stirs up powerful emotions among descendants of the Dakota and white settlers who experienced this tragedy. Hundreds of people lost their lives in just over a month of fighting in 1862. By the time the year was over, thirty-eight Dakota men had been hanged in the largest mass execution in United States history. Not long afterwards, the United States abrogated its treaties with the Dakota, confiscated their reservations along the Minnesota River, and forced most of the Dakota to remove westward. While dozens of books and articles have been written about these events, scholars have largely ignored an important legal development that occurred in Minnesota during the following summer. The inneM sota Adjutant General, at the direction of Minnesota Governors Alexander Ramsey and Henry Swift, issued a series of orders offering rewards for the killing of Dakota men found within the State.
    [Show full text]
  • Red River of the North “A Winding Journey to History
    RED RIVER OF THE NORTH “A WINDING JOURNEY TO HISTORY” Headwaters at Breckenridge, Minnesota, U.S.A. By NEOMA A. LAKEN 2010 CONTENTS WELCOME FOREWORD INTRODUCTION CHAPTER 1 General Information CHAPTER 2 Prehistoric Heritage CHAPTER 3 Converging Rivers CHAPTER 4 Steamboats, Flatboats & Barges CHAPTER 5 Graham’s Point, Pre-1819 Trading Post CHAPTER 6 Red River Oxcarts CHAPTER 7 Fort Abercrombie, Dakota Territory CHAPTER 8 Sister River Cities: Breckenridge, MN Wahpeton, ND CHAPTER 9 Red River of the North Flooding CHAPTER 10 Flora and Fauna CHAPTER 11 Renewed Vision for the Red River of the North EPILOG REFERENCES - 2 - WELCOME... Breckenridge, Wilkin County, Minnesota, United States of America, and Wahpeton, Richland County, North Dakota, United States of America, welcome you to the Red River of the North. Some of the information contained comes from the records in the office of the County Recorder, in the Wilkin County Courthouse, Breckenridge MN. Some is local historical lore passed on to generations throughout the years and told to the author. While yet other information is a meshing of historical facts. As with the telling of any history, sagas differ slightly with the various perspectives of the authors. I hope you will find your visit to the Red River of the North a pleasant one. Enjoy your visit . and come back soon! Neoma A. Laken, Author 108 North 15th Street Breckenridge, Minnesota 56520 United States of America All rights in and to this book reserved by author. No portion may be reprinted without permission. Additional copies of this book are available from River Keepers, 325 7th St South, Fargo, ND 58103, www.riverkeepers.org for a cost of $10.
    [Show full text]
  • The US-Dakota War of 1862 Minnesota Historical Society
    The US-Dakota War of 1862 Minnesota Historical Society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file:///private/var/folders/PQ/PQLev8E5Gj86GCQYVrSGfU+++TI... Re: [Website feedback] Permission to include print version of web pages as part of district curriculum Aimee VL Hohn to: karen.randall 10/22/2012 10:16 AM Show Details History: This message has been replied to. Hi Karen- Just got the go-ahead for you to use the website material for your needs. Just credit MHS per our use policy: http://www.mnhs.org/mhsuse.html Let me know if you need anything else. Thanks, Aimee On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 1:43 PM, <[email protected]> wrote: Karen Randall ([email protected]) sent a message using the contact form at http://www.usdakotawar.org/contact. I am working on curriculum to be used by Saint Paul 6th grade teachers as part of instruction on research and informational text writing. The focus of the work is the US-Dakota War and your web site is an excellent, comprehensive resource. Access to computers is an issue in many schools, though, so it would be helpful to be able to provide teachers and students with PDF versions of some pages from your site, for printing at their buildings.
    [Show full text]
  • Claims for Depredations by Sioux Indians. (To Accompany Bill H.R
    University of Oklahoma College of Law University of Oklahoma College of Law Digital Commons American Indian and Alaskan Native Documents in the Congressional Serial Set: 1817-1899 4-4-1864 Claims for depredations by Sioux Indians. (To accompany bill H.R. no. 377.). Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.law.ou.edu/indianserialset Part of the Indian and Aboriginal Law Commons Recommended Citation H.R. Rep. No. 42, 38th Cong., 1st Sess. (1864) This House Report is brought to you for free and open access by University of Oklahoma College of Law Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in American Indian and Alaskan Native Documents in the Congressional Serial Set: 1817-1899 by an authorized administrator of University of Oklahoma College of Law Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. 38TH CoNGREss, } HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES. REPORT 1st Session. { No. 42. CLAIMS FOR DEPREDATIONS BY SIOUX INDIANS. [To accompany bill H. R. No. 377.] APRIL 4, 1864.-0rdered to be printed. J\fr. WINDOM, from the Committee on Indian Affairs, made the following REPORT. The Committee on Indian Affairs, to wkom was riferred tl~e letter f1'0m tl~e Sec­ ntary if the Interior, transmitting "report qf commissione1·s on claims pre­ sented for injuries and dep1·edations by tke Sioux Indians, in lYiinnesota, in 1862," kave had tke same under consideration, and unanimously submit tke following report : That under and by virtue of treaties made with the Sisseton, 'Vahpaton, :M:edawakanton, and W ahpakoota bands of Dakot::t or Sioux Indians, on the 29th day of September, 1837, and the 23d day of July and the 5th day of August, 1851, respectively, the United States held in trust for said Indians an aggregate sum of $3,301,000, on which said Indians received interest at the rate of five per cent.
    [Show full text]
  • Indian Wars.8-98.P65
    A Guide to the Microfiche Edition of Research Collections in Native American Studies The Indian Wars of the West and Frontier Army Life, 18621898 Official Histories and Personal Narratives UNIVERSITY PUBLICATIONS OF AMERICA A Guide to the Microfiche Edition of THE INDIAN WARS OF THE WEST AND FRONTIER ARMY LIFE, 1862–1898 Official Histories and Personal Narratives Project Editor and Guide Compiled by: Robert E. Lester A microfiche project of UNIVERSITY PUBLICATIONS OF AMERICA An Imprint of CIS 4520 East-West Highway • Bethesda, MD 20814-3389 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data The Indian wars of the West and frontier army life, 1862–1898 [microform] : official histories and personal narratives / project editor, Robert E. Lester microfiche. Accompanied by a printed guide compiled by Robert E. Lester, entitled: A guide to the microfiche edition of The Indian wars of the West and frontier army life, 1862–1898. ISBN 1-55655-598-9 (alk. paper) 1. Indians of North America--Wars--1862–1865--Sources. 2. Indians of North America--Wars--1866–1895--Sources. 3. United States. Army--Military life--History--19th century--Sources. 4. West (U.S.)--History--19th century--Sources. I. Lester, Robert. II. University Publications of America (Firm) III. Title: Guide to the microfilm edition of The Indian wars of the West and frontier army life, 1862–1898. [E81] 978'.02—dc21 98-12605 CIP Copyright © 1998 by University Publications of America. All rights reserved. ISBN 1-55655-598-9. ii TABLE OF CONTENTS Scope and Content Note ................................................................................................. v Arrangement of Material .................................................................................................. ix List of Contributing Institutions ..................................................................................... xi Source Note .....................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Forts on the Minnesota Frontier
    Forts on the Minnesota Frontier The United States Army in the nineteenth century did much more than fight in wars or conduct military campaigns. It also played a major role in the expansion and settlement of the American frontier. Most early exploration was conducted under military authority, such as the 1804-06 expedition of Capt. Meriwether Lewis and Lt. William Clark. Lt. Zebulon Pike selected the site for Fort Snelling while on his way to find the headwaters of the Mississippi in 1805-06 — and in so doing chose the place from which "Minnesota" would emerge. Fort Snelling, and the wilderness military outposts which followed, represented the government on Minnesota's early frontier. The soldiers enforced laws, served as a check on Indians in the area, built roads and, by their very presence, spurred trade and settlement by offering protection for the early traders, missionaries and pioneer farmers. US Army Forts in Minnesota Fort Snelling, established in 1819, stood as a lone sentinel on the frontier for thirty years. Then a series of Indian treaties opened up vast new lands to settlement, creating a need for three more Army posts. Fort Ripley, 1849 - 1877, located on the upper Mississippi below the mouth of the Crow Wing River. It was built in 1848-49 by dragoons and infantrymen from Fort Snelling. When it opened, it replaced Fort Snelling as the northernmost military installation and was originally intended to control the Winnebago Indians who had been removed from Iowa to a nearby reservation. Fort Ridgely, 1853 - 1867, located on the Minnesota River in present-day Nicollet County, above New Ulm.
    [Show full text]