Dakota Conflict of 1862
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT: an Inventory of Its State Park Maps
MINNESOTA HISTORICAL SOCIETY Minnesota State Archives HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT An Inventory of Its State Park Maps OVERVIEW OF THE RECORDS Agency: Minnesota. Dept. of Highways. Series Title: State park maps, Dates: 1922. Abstract: Blueprint maps showing boundaries and facilities in state parks. Quantity: 22 items in oversize folder. Location: A3/ov4 Drawer 2 SCOPE AND CONTENTS OF THE RECORDS Blueprint maps showing boundaries and facilities in various state parks, with proposed expansions of the park's land area or the addition of facilities. Most show plot plans and give elevation information. The maps were drawn by the Highway Department on orders of Governor J. A. O. Preus for use in legislative deliberations regarding park budgets, according to information printed on the maps. RELATED MATERIALS Related materials: Later state park maps, created by the state Conservation Department, are found with that department's records. INDEX TERMS This collection is indexed under the following headings in the catalog of the Minnesota Historical Society. Researchers desiring materials about related topics, persons or places should search the catalog using these headings. Topics: Mapping. Parks--Minnesota--Maps. Parks--Minnesota--Finance. Types of Documents: Hghwy005.inv HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT. State Park Maps, 1922. p. 2 Maps--Minnesota. Site plans--Minnesota. ADMINISTRATIVE INFORMATION Preferred Citation: [Indicate the cited item here]. Minnesota. Dept. of Highways. State park maps, 1922. Minnesota Historical Society. State Archives. See the Chicago Manual of Style for additional examples. Accession Information: Accession number(s): 991-52 Processing Information: PALS ID No.: 0900036077 RLIN ID No.: MNHV94-A228 ITEM LIST Note to Researchers: To request materials, please note the location and drawer number shown below. -
On Duty at Fort Ridgely, Minnesota: 1853-1867
Copyright © 1977 by the South Dakota State Historical Society. All Rights Reserved. On Duty at Fort Ridgcly, Minnesota: 1853-1867 PAUL L. HEDREN Fort Ridgely, Minnesota, rests securely in the annals of western American history because of the very significant role it played in the tragic 1862 Sioux Uprising. During the autumn of that year it provided protection for hundreds of homeless and stricken civilians. The post was actually besieged by hostile Indians on several occasions-an act not as common to history as it is to television and movies! And the fort served as a major focal point for the military operations that finaily quelied the Central-Minnesota hostilities. Contrary to most studies on the subject, however, a look at Fort Ridgely should be more than just an examination of the events of 1862.^ An encompassing study of this interesting post should look at the art of soldiering in the Upper Midwest, with all its associated ills and blessings. A study should look at the relationships between the military and civilians at this fort. An investigation of Fort Ridgely should answer numerous ques- tions. Just who served there? Who led those men? How did they dress? What did they accomplish? Ridgely was a vibrant fort, and it does have an interesting history-beyond the year 1862. The need for a military post on the Upper Minnesota River was quickly recognized and urged following the signing in 1851 of treaties with Minnesota bands of Sioux Indians. It was argued that troops should be better positioned to operate offensively 1. The standard approach to Fort Ridgely history has been to briefly examine the construction and use of the post, preparatory to lengthy discussions of the Sioux attacks in 1862, Such studies as Kenneth Carley's Vie Sioux Uprising of 1862 (St. -
Minnesota Statutes 2020, Chapter 85
1 MINNESOTA STATUTES 2020 85.011 CHAPTER 85 DIVISION OF PARKS AND RECREATION STATE PARKS, RECREATION AREAS, AND WAYSIDES 85.06 SCHOOLHOUSES IN CERTAIN STATE PARKS. 85.011 CONFIRMATION OF CREATION AND 85.20 VIOLATIONS OF RULES; LITTERING; PENALTIES. ESTABLISHMENT OF STATE PARKS, STATE 85.205 RECEPTACLES FOR RECYCLING. RECREATION AREAS, AND WAYSIDES. 85.21 STATE OPERATION OF PARK, MONUMENT, 85.0115 NOTICE OF ADDITIONS AND DELETIONS. RECREATION AREA AND WAYSIDE FACILITIES; 85.012 STATE PARKS. LICENSE NOT REQUIRED. 85.013 STATE RECREATION AREAS AND WAYSIDES. 85.22 STATE PARKS WORKING CAPITAL ACCOUNT. 85.014 PRIOR LAWS NOT ALTERED; REVISOR'S DUTIES. 85.23 COOPERATIVE LEASES OF AGRICULTURAL 85.0145 ACQUIRING LAND FOR FACILITIES. LANDS. 85.0146 CUYUNA COUNTRY STATE RECREATION AREA; 85.32 STATE WATER TRAILS. CITIZENS ADVISORY COUNCIL. 85.33 ST. CROIX WILD RIVER AREA; LIMITATIONS ON STATE TRAILS POWER BOATING. 85.015 STATE TRAILS. 85.34 FORT SNELLING LEASE. 85.0155 LAKE SUPERIOR WATER TRAIL. TRAIL PASSES 85.0156 MISSISSIPPI WHITEWATER TRAIL. 85.40 DEFINITIONS. 85.016 BICYCLE TRAIL PROGRAM. 85.41 CROSS-COUNTRY-SKI PASSES. 85.017 TRAIL REGISTRY. 85.42 USER FEE; VALIDITY. 85.018 TRAIL USE; VEHICLES REGULATED, RESTRICTED. 85.43 DISPOSITION OF RECEIPTS; PURPOSE. ADMINISTRATION 85.44 CROSS-COUNTRY-SKI TRAIL GRANT-IN-AID 85.019 LOCAL RECREATION GRANTS. PROGRAM. 85.021 ACQUIRING LAND; MINNESOTA VALLEY TRAIL. 85.45 PENALTIES. 85.04 ENFORCEMENT DIVISION EMPLOYEES. 85.46 HORSE -
Minnesota River State Trail Master Plan Draft
MINNESOTA RIVER STATE TRAIL MASTER PLAN DRAFT Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Division of Parks and Trails November 2013 Minnesota River State Trail Master Plan Franklin to Le Sueur The Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, Parks and Trails Division would like to thank all who participated in this master planning process. Many individuals and groups in trail communities have been working for many years to help establish this trail. Many DNR staff, city, county, state and federal officials, trail association members and local citizens contributed their time and energy to the planning process as well. Project Team: • Laurie Young, Planning Supervisor • Suzanne Rhees, AICP, Principal Planner • Adam DeKleyn, CCM, Planning Specialist • Darin Newman, CCM, Planning Specialist • Paul Hansen, Region 4 District 9 Supervisor Minnesota Department of Natural Resources. Equal opportunity to participate in and benefit from programs of the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources is available to all individuals regardless of race, color, creed, religion, national origin, sex, marital status, status with regard to public assistance, age, sexual orientation, membership or activity in a local commission, or disability. Discrimination inquiries should be sent to MN-DNR, 500 Lafayette Road, St. Paul, MN 55155-4031; or the Equal Opportunity Office, Department of the Interior, Washington, DC 20240. For general information regarding DNR’s programs, contact: Minnesota Department of Natural Resources 500 Lafayette Road St. Paul, MN 55155-4040 http://www.dnr.state.mn.us 651-296-6157 (Metro area and outside Minnesota) 1-888-MINNDNR (MN Toll Free) TDD: 651-296-5485 (Metro Area) TDD: 1-800-657-3929 (MN Toll Free) Minnesota River State Trail Master Plan Franklin to Le Sueur [PLACEHOLDER – COMMISSIONER’S APPROVAL] Minnesota River State Trail Master Plan Franklin to Le Sueur TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary .................................................................................................................................................. -
Minnesota Statutes 2020, Section 138.662
1 MINNESOTA STATUTES 2020 138.662 138.662 HISTORIC SITES. Subdivision 1. Named. Historic sites established and confirmed as historic sites together with the counties in which they are situated are listed in this section and shall be named as indicated in this section. Subd. 2. Alexander Ramsey House. Alexander Ramsey House; Ramsey County. History: 1965 c 779 s 3; 1967 c 54 s 4; 1971 c 362 s 1; 1973 c 316 s 4; 1993 c 181 s 2,13 Subd. 3. Birch Coulee Battlefield. Birch Coulee Battlefield; Renville County. History: 1965 c 779 s 5; 1973 c 316 s 9; 1976 c 106 s 2,4; 1984 c 654 art 2 s 112; 1993 c 181 s 2,13 Subd. 4. [Repealed, 2014 c 174 s 8] Subd. 5. [Repealed, 1996 c 452 s 40] Subd. 6. Camp Coldwater. Camp Coldwater; Hennepin County. History: 1965 c 779 s 7; 1973 c 225 s 1,2; 1993 c 181 s 2,13 Subd. 7. Charles A. Lindbergh House. Charles A. Lindbergh House; Morrison County. History: 1965 c 779 s 5; 1969 c 956 s 1; 1971 c 688 s 2; 1993 c 181 s 2,13 Subd. 8. Folsom House. Folsom House; Chisago County. History: 1969 c 894 s 5; 1993 c 181 s 2,13 Subd. 9. Forest History Center. Forest History Center; Itasca County. History: 1993 c 181 s 2,13 Subd. 10. Fort Renville. Fort Renville; Chippewa County. History: 1969 c 894 s 5; 1973 c 225 s 3; 1993 c 181 s 2,13 Subd. -
Was Gen. Henry Sibley's Son Hanged in Mankato?
The Filicide Enigma: Was Gen. Henry Sibley’s Son Ha nged in Ma nkato? By Walt Bachman Introduction For the first 20 years of Henry Milord’s life, he and Henry Sibley both lived in the small village of Mendota, Minnesota, where, especially during Milord’s childhood, they enjoyed a close relationship. But when the paths of Sibley and Milord crossed in dramatic fashion in the fall of 1862, the two men had lived apart for years. During that period of separation, in 1858 Sibley ascended to the peak of his power and acclaim as Minnesota’s first governor, presiding over the affairs of the booming new state from his historic stone house in Mendota. As recounted in Rhoda Gilman’s excellent 2004 biography, Henry Hastings Sibley: Divided Heart, Sibley had occupied key positions of leadership since his arrival in Minnesota in 1834, managing the regional fur trade and representing Minnesota Territory in Congress before his term as governor. He was the most important figure in 19th century Minnesota history. As Sibley was governing the new state, Milord, favoring his Dakota heritage on his mother’s side, opted to live on the new Dakota reservation along the upper Minnesota River and was, according to his mother, “roaming with the Sioux.” Financially, Sibley was well-established from his years in the fur trade, and especially from his receipt of substantial sums (at the Dakotas’ expense) as proceeds from 1851 treaties. 1 Milord proba bly quickly spe nt all of the far more modest benefit from an earlier treaty to which he, as a mixed-blood Dakota, was entitled. -
Little Crow Historic Canoe Route
Taoyateduta Minnesota River HISTORIC water trail BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA Twin Valley Council U.S.-Dakota War of 1862 AUGUST 17, 1862 The TA-OYA-TE DUTA Fish and Wildlife Minnesota River Historic Water Four Dakota men kill five settlers The Minnesota River Basin is a Trail, is an 88 mile water route at Acton in Meeker County birding paradise. The Minnesota stretching from just south of AUGUST 18 River is a haven for bird life and Granite Falls to New Ulm, Minne- several species of waterfowl and War begins with attack on the sota. The river route is named af- riparian birds use the river corri- Lower Sioux Agency and other set- ter Taoyateduta (Little Crow), the dor for nesting, breeding, and rest- tlements; ambush and battle at most prominent Dakota figure in ing during migration. More than the U.S.-Dakota War of 1862. Redwood Ferry. Traders stores 320 species have been recorded in near Upper Sioux Agency attacked the Minnesota River Valley. - The Minnesota River - AUGUST 19 Beneath the often grayish and First attack on New Ulm leading to The name Minnesota is a Da- cloudy waters of the Minnesota its evacuation; Sibley appointed kota word translated variously as River, swim a diverse fish popula- "sky-tinted water” or “cloudy-sky tion. The number of fish species commander of U.S. troops water". The river is gentle and and abundance has seen a signifi- AUGUST 20 placid for most of its course and cant rebound over the last several First Fort Ridgely attack. one will encounter only a few mi- years. -
Comprehensive Historic Preservation Plan Was Written in 2009
NORTH DAKOTA STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICE ARCHAEOLOGY AND HISTORIC PRESERVATION DIVISION STATE HISTORICAL SOCIETY OF NORTH DAKOTA 612 EAST BOULEVARD AVENUE BISMARCK, NORTH DAKOTA 58505-0830 PRESERVATION IN NORTH DAKOTA, 2016-2021: A Statewide Comprehensive Plan PRESERVATION IN NORTH DAKOTA, 2016-2021: Telephone: (701) 328-2672 FAX: (701) 328-3710 http://history.nd.gov HISTORIC December 2015 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS: The preparation of this plan revision was a group effort. Research, discussion, writing and reviews were performed primarily by the staff of the State Historic Preservation Office, sitting as an ad hoc planning committee and by other individuals from the staff of the State Historical Society of North Dakota, each bringing his or her own perspective, expertise, experience and philosophical viewpoints, to help formulate a comprehensive yet balanced preservation concept. Preservation constituents and respondents from the general public gave time and generously contributed ideas, evaluations, suggestions, concerns, and assessments. To each and all of these sincere gratitude is offered, as it is to previous staff and public participants whose contributions to earlier planning studies and efforts were of great value to the development of this plan. This document may be provided in other communication formats. If special format copies are desired, please contact: The Division of Archaeology and Historic Preservation State Historical Society of North Dakota 612 East Boulevard Avenue Bismarck, North Dakota 58505 Telephone: (701) 328-2672 Fax: (701) 328-3710 http://history.nd.gov The State Historical Society of North Dakota receives federal funds from the U. S. Department of the Interior, National Park Service, to assist with costs of administering the Historic Preservation program in this state. -
Wisconsin and Iowa Troops Fight Boredom, Not Indians, in Minnesota
NEIGHBORS "TO THE RESCUE" Edward Noyes FOR A SHORT TIME in the fldl of 1862, two regiments bank of the Minnesota River a short distance from neighboring states were dispatched to Minnesota to downstream from its junction with the Redwood. In the help quell the Sioux Uprising, or Dakota War. The units next five days, the Indians twice attacked Fort Ridgely involved were the Twenty-fifth \\'isconsin and the on the north bank of the Minnesota and twice lashed out Twenty-seventh Iowa Volunteer Infantry regiments. The at the German town of New Ulm on the south. When all Wisconsin soldiers served in Minnesota just short of of these attacks were repulsed, the Sioux were unable to three months and the lowans for nearly a month. Militar- condnue down the Minnesota Valley toward St. Paul and ilv', the W-'isconsin men played a role directly associated Minneapolis. In spite of this and their lack of a planned with the Dakota War bv' contributing to the stabilization campaign, the Indians possessed the initiative. By of the frontier. The lowans' main service was to assist exploiting it, they took a heavy toll of white lives, did with an annuitv payment to the restless, but for the most much damage to the property of settlers, and caused the part peaceful, Chippewa (Ojibway) Indians.' wholesale desertion of numerous communities and coun It may be that, because the out-of-state troops were ties.^ in Minnesota only briefly — indeed, some of them won Back in St. Paul, energetic Governor Alexander dered why they were there at all — their campaigning Ramsey met the crisis quickly. -
Central-Section-Byway-Tear-Map.Pdf
1 Granite Falls Footbridge 9 Sacred Heart Area Museum 17 Renville County Historical Museum 25 Wanda Gág House This pedestrian suspension bridge was built in 1935 by the A stucco building with a dome-style bell tower where Take a trip back into history by touring the six building The childhood home turned museum of Wanda Hazel Gag, Minneapolis Bridge Company with design and materials people once congregated for church services. Now, home complex. Rotating exhibits, a research library, a author of classic children’s books. from the Roebling & Sons Company (Brooklyn Bridge). to collections of the Sacred Heart Area Historical Society. schoolhouse, and more. 507-359-2632 | 226 N Washington Street, New Ulm 320-321-3202 | 676 Prentice Street, Granite Falls 320-765-8868 | 300 5th Avenue, Sacred Heart 507-697-6147 | 441 N Park Drive, Morton www.wandagaghouse.org www.granitefallschamber.com www.facebook.com/sacredheartmuseum/ www.renvillecountyhistory.com 26 Glockenspiel 2 Andrew J. Volstead House Museum 10 Joseph R. Brown State Wayside Rest 18 Morton Monuments A unique 45-foot, free-standing clock tower with animated A National Historic Landmark, Congressman Volstead was View displays of the granite ruins of Brown’s home which The first obelisk stands in memory of the soldiers figures that depict the city’s history. the co-author of the Capper Volstead Cooperatives Act and was destroyed during the U.S.-Dakota War of 1862. Brown who fought the Battle of Birch Coulee. The second 888-463-9856 | 327 N Minnesota Street, New Ulm author of the Prohibition Enforcement Act or Volstead Act. -
Minnesota Red River Trails
NPS Form 10-900-b 0MB No, 7024-0078 (Jan 1987) ' ^ n >. •• ' M United States Department of the Interior j ; j */i i~i U i_J National Park Service National Register of Historic Places 41990' Multiple Property Documentation Form NATIONAL REGISTER This form is for use in documenting multiple property groups relating to one or several historic contexts. See instructions in Guidelines for Completing National Register Forms (National Register Bulletin 16). Complete each item by marking "x" in the appropriate box or by entering the requested information. For additional space use continuation sheets (Form 10-900-a). Type all entries. A. Name of Multiple Property Listing_______________________________________ Minnesota Red River Trails B. Associated Historic Contexts Minnesota Red River Trails, 1835-1871 C. Geographical Data State of Minnesota I | See continuation sheet D. Certification As the designated authority under the Nal ional Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as amended, I hereby certify that this documentation form meets the National R< gister documentation standards and sets forth requirements for the listing of related ^fo^r^e&-^r\^^r(l \feith the Natii nal Register criteria. This submission meets the procedural and professional requirerrlents^eftirfn in 36 GnWFari 6Q~ tftd-the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Planning and Evaluation. rJ it fft> Sigriature or certifying official I an R. Stewart Date / / __________________Deputy State-Historic Preservation Officer State or Federal agency and bureau ,,. , , Minnesota Historical Society 1, herebAcertify that this multiple property documentation form has been approved by the National Register as a basis for evaluating related properties for listing in the National Register. -
Landscapes, Commemorations, and Enduring Conflicts of the U.S.-Dakota Arw of 1862
Georgia State University ScholarWorks @ Georgia State University History Dissertations Department of History Fall 12-14-2011 Reconciling Memory: Landscapes, Commemorations, and Enduring Conflicts of the U.S.-Dakota arW of 1862 Julie A. Anderson Georgia State University Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.gsu.edu/history_diss Part of the History Commons Recommended Citation Anderson, Julie A., "Reconciling Memory: Landscapes, Commemorations, and Enduring Conflicts of the U.S.-Dakota War of 1862." Dissertation, Georgia State University, 2011. https://scholarworks.gsu.edu/history_diss/28 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Department of History at ScholarWorks @ Georgia State University. It has been accepted for inclusion in History Dissertations by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks @ Georgia State University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. RECONCILING MEMORY: LANDSCAPES, COMMEMORATIONS, AND ENDURING CONFLICTS OF THE U.S.-DAKOTA WAR OF 1862 by JULIE HUMANN ANDERSON Under the Direction of Clifford M. Kuhn ABSTRACT The U.S.-Dakota War of 1862 resulted in the deaths of more than 500 Minnesota settlers, the expulsion of the Dakota people from their homeland, and the largest mass execution in U.S. history. For more than a century, white Minnesotans declared themselves innocent victims of Indian brutality and actively remembered this war by erecting monuments, preserving historic landscapes, publishing first-person narratives, and hosting anniversary celebrations. However, as the centennial anniversary approached, new awareness for the sufferings of the Dakota both before and after the war prompted retellings of the traditional story that gave the status of victimhood to the Dakota as well as the white settlers.