The Politics of Political Geography

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Politics of Political Geography 1 The Politics of Political Geography Guntram H. Herb INTRODUCTION case of political geography, the usual story is of a heyday characterized by racism, imperialism, and ‘La Géographie, de nouveau un savoir politique’ war in the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, (Geography: once again a political knowledge). followed by a period of stagnation and decline in the 1950s, and finally a Phoenix-like revival (Lacoste, 1984) that started in the late 1960s and now seems to be coming to a lackluster end with the cooptation This statement by the chief editor of Hérodote, of key issues of ‘politics’ and ‘power’ by other intended to celebrate the politicization of French sub-disciplines of geography. However, as David geography through the journal in the 1970s and Livingstone has pointed out so aptly, the history of 1980s, also, and paradoxically, captures a profound geography, and by extension, political geography, dilemma of contemporary political geography. If, cannot be reduced to a single story (Livingstone, as a recent academic forum showed, the political 1995). There are many stories and these stories is alive and well in all of geography, does this not are marked by discontinuities and contestations, in question the continued relevance and validity of other words, ‘messy contingencies’, which compli- having a separate sub-field of political geography cate things (Livingstone, 1993: 28). (Cox and Low, 2003)? The most fruitful response A further problem is what one should include to such existential questions about academic sub- under the rubric ‘political geography’: publica- disciplines is delving into the past and tracing the tions of scholars, the work of professional academic genesis of the subject. In what follows, I will seek associations, the content of courses, textbooks and to understand the meaning of political geography popular accounts, or the activities of practition- by analyzing the historical development and impli- ers in government institutions (Mamadouh, 2003: cations for present practices, in short, the politics 664–5)? A promising solution to understanding the of political geography. politics of political geography is to focus on its cen- The standard starting points for political histo- tral concepts, such as power, territory, boundaries, ries of academic subjects are the first use of the scale, and place (Agnew et al., 2003). Yet, the diffi- term and the seminal first work; in the present culty remains of deciding which concepts are truly case, the coining of ‘political geography’ by the central (Mamadouh, 2004). French philosopher Turgot in 1750 and the publi- As an alternative to standard evolutionary and cation of Friedrich Ratzel’s Political Geography concept-based approaches, I have chosen to orga- in 1897 (Agnew, 2002: 13). Yet, the majority nize my discussion of the politics of political geog- of evolutionary approaches are limiting, to say raphy around the arguably most visible structure nothing of being potentially stodgy and boring. at the heart of the ‘political’: the state. This does The tendency is to present a story of progress from not mean that I advocate a state-centred approach a benighted past to an enlightened present. In the to political geography or restrict my analysis to [09:42 1/8/2007 4952-Cox-Ch01.tex] Paper Size: a4 paper Job No: 4952 Cox: Handbook of Political Geography Page: 21 21–40 22 THE SCOPE AND DEVELOPMENT OF POLITICAL GEOGRAPHY politics with a large ‘P’(Flint, 2003). Recent schol- geographers in this tradition is implicated in the arship on the politics of identity, the role of political governance of the state and aids state administra- discourse, and changing forms of political practice tion and policy. It is inward-looking and eschews have exposed such a view as short-sighted (Dalby, the problem of states in their relations with one 1992; Kodras, 1999; Cox and Low, 2003; Pratt, another. 2004). Nevertheless, neither the embodied politics Political geographers in the third tradition are at the level of the individual nor the networked critical of the activity, purpose, and legitimacy politics at the global scale can exclude consid- of the state. They recognize multiple scales and eration of the state. States continue to be major expressions of power from the bodies of individ- reference points of politics by virtue of the binding uals to global networks. Some of them focus on legal codes they define and enforce. class and the dominant influence of the capital- While I have singled out the state as the ‘pivot’ ist world economy, others direct their attention of political geography – to borrow a term from to diverse groups and communities, embrace the Halford Mackinder–Idosointhesense of a locus notion of hybridity of identities, and examine the of engagement, not in the sense of the state as the discursive power and production of knowledge. exclusive locus of politics and power. Moreover, They are united in their engagement with social my view of the state is not restricted to the modern process, which makes them distinct from the other or territorial state that is premised on the nation- two traditions. Political geographers in this vein state ideal, but includes other spatially constituted openly work toward transformation to achieve structures of government and political authority, destabilization, resistance, or revolution. They are such as the early states of antiquity, the networks oriented toward oppositional groups and new social of medieval power or the increasingly state-like movements. European Union. The term ‘state’ simply offers the The advantages of organizing a history of politi- most succinct way to express the institutionalized cal geography along the traditions of advocacy, political authority and mode of social organization governance, and critique of the state respectively that is behind ‘strategies of inclusion and exclu- are two-fold. First, they allow a consideration of sion, of territory and territoriality’, and thus at the political ideologies since, for the most part, these heart of political geography (Cox, forthcoming). ways of engagement or traditions reflect the major Historically, political geographers have engaged political ideologies of right, center, and left. All with the state in three ways: they have sought too often political ideologies are not presented to facilitate the process of maximizing its power up-front in political geographic studies but brought over space; to maintain and manage its territorial in through the back door (Agnew, 2003: 605). existence; and to actively resist and question its Second, this approach avoids a potential silenc- spatially manifested actions. I propose to use these ing of alternative approaches. Histories generally three ways or traditions to achieve a deeper and focus on those perspectives that are most visible more comprehensive understanding of the politics or dominant in a given time period, which gives of political geography. the impression that other views are obsolete. For Political geographers that follow the first way example, the critical view is currently the pre- prioritize the state as the most important actor, vailing approach in the flagship journal, Political privilege the state or national interest, and are Geography, and a perusal of its content would not decidedly realist or power-oriented. They employ fully reflect the key role that advocacy of state oppositional identities (us/them, black/white) and power continues to play in other disciplines, in oppositions of power (sea vs land power) to offer conservative think-tanks, and outside academia. representations of the world that dazzle through As with all forms of organizing knowledge, their simplicity. They have an activist stance and the focus on the three traditions I have outlined advocate change to achieve state dominance in a requires some caveats. The structure is necessar- world characterized by competition and conflict. ily arbitrary and simplistic. Within each tradition As a consequence, their work focuses on state and there are different expressions and one should not global scales for the most part, though internal divi- assume uniformity in thought or political orien- sions are recognized as important for the strength tation. For example, the scholars associated with of the state. Their efforts privilege the role of the the journal Hérodote are advocates of state power, state executive. yet fall into the Neo-Marxist camp. Likewise, a By contrast, work in the second tradition denies nationalist focus is not the sole prerogative of the political motives and professes neutrality and power-oriented tradition, but can also be found objectivity. The goal is to maintain a balanced among practitioners of the governance tradition. and peaceful status quo or a homeostatic equi- I attempt to address the plurality and hybridity librium in a closed system. The state is viewed that exists in the last section of the chapter, where as a given and its existence is not problema- I examine how the three traditions are reflected in tized. The main focus is at the scale of the state maps and other forms of visualization and I iden- and its administrative regions. Work by political tify there areas of difference and cross-fertilization. [09:42 1/8/2007 4952-Cox-Ch01.tex] Paper Size: a4 paper Job No: 4952 Cox: Handbook of Political Geography Page: 22 21–40 THE POLITICS OF POLITICAL GEOGRAPHY 23 As further safeguards against one-sided and facile guidance for political action. Of central importance interpretations I am including critical notes in the was how environmental features, such as moun- tradition of Hérodote so as to extend the discussion. tains, rivers, climate, and coastlines or the relative disposition of landmasses and oceans, affected the control of territories. This did not mean that the tradition employed a crude form of environmen- NO LIMITS? MAXIMIZING THE POWER talism, since these geographers were particularly OF THE STATE interested in the way technology (such as railroads) or societal development (such as urbanization) The objective of geographic work in this tradition affected the influence of the environment.
Recommended publications
  • “Gift” of Ratzel For/From the Indian Ocean: Thoughts on Mobilities, Materialities and Relational Spaces
    Geogr. Helv., 72, 85–92, 2017 www.geogr-helv.net/72/85/2017/ doi:10.5194/gh-72-85-2017 © Author(s) 2017. CC Attribution 3.0 License. supported by The neglected “gift” of Ratzel for/from the Indian Ocean: thoughts on mobilities, materialities and relational spaces Julia Verne Department of Geography, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany Correspondence to: Julia Verne ([email protected]) Received: 16 September 2015 – Revised: 5 January 2017 – Accepted: 20 January 2017 – Published: 16 February 2017 Abstract. When Korf (2014) recently invited (critical) geographers to come to terms with the problematic heritage of our discipline, especially with respect to spatial political thought, he first of all drew our attention to the intellectual contributions of Martin Heidegger and Carl Schmitt. While he urges us to rethink our ongoing references to these key thinkers, especially in light of the rather strict avoidance of “politically problematic” figures within our own discipline, such as Haushofer and Ratzel, this article now wishes to address geography’s (dis)engagement with its politically problematic heritage from the opposite angle: focusing on Friedrich Ratzel, it asks if we might have been too radical in condemning his work as only “poison”? What if the neglect of Ratzel has actually led to a moment where his ideas feature prominently in current geographical debates without us even noticing it? By drawing on his contributions to cultural geography and, in particular, the establishment of the cultural historical method and German diffusionism, this article takes up on this question and reflects on the (imagined/actual) role of Ratzel’s scholarship in contemporary geography.
    [Show full text]
  • Alexandros Stogiannos Dismissing the Myth of the Ratzelian
    Historical Geography and Geosciences Alexandros Stogiannos The Genesis of Geopolitics and Friedrich Ratzel Dismissing the Myth of the Ratzelian Geodeterminism Historical Geography and Geosciences This book series serves as a broad platform for contributions in the field of Historical Geography and related Geoscience areas. The series welcomes proposals on the history and dynamics of place and space and their influence on past, present and future geographies including historical GIS, cartography and mapping, climatology, climate history, meteorology and atmospheric sciences, environmental geography, hydrology, geology, oceanography, water management, instrumentation, geographical traditions, historical geography of urban areas, settlements and landscapes, historical regional studies, history of geography and historic geographers and geoscientists among other topically related areas and other interdisciplinary approaches. Contributions on past (extreme) weather events or natural disasters including regional and global reanalysis studies also fit into the series. Publishing a broad portfolio of peer-reviewed scientific books Historical Geography and Geosciences contains research monographs, edited volumes, advanced and undergraduate level textbooks, as well as conference proceedings. This series appeals to scientists, practitioners and students in the fields of geography and history as well as related disciplines, with exceptional titles that are attractive to a popular science audience. More information about this series at http://www.springer.com/series/15611
    [Show full text]
  • Military Geography, Militarism's Geographies
    page 1 Chapter One Military Geography, Militarism’s Geographies Military Geographies are Everywhere I stood at the fence and looked in through the wire. On the other side lay a broad strip of grass. A little further on and to the left, sat red-and white- painted wooden baffle boards, mounted with lights. Further on from that, the dull, grey strip of runway stretched off into the distance. At the far end huddled a collection of structures and objects in shades of green, grey and black, unidentifiable from this distance. Occasional pops from rifle fire, perhaps, competed with the traffic noise from the road beside me. Crows hopped around on the empty runway. I poured a cup of coffee from my vacuum flask, watched and waited. Engine noise grew louder and then a dark blue pick-up truck with US-style police lights and a foreign number- plate came driving swiftly up the service road alongside the runway, slowing as it rounded the end, and then halting, to my right. I’d been seen, a coffee- toting speck beyond the perimeter fence at the bottom of the runway. The pick-up drove right to left in front of me, 30 m distant, two beret-topped heads swivelled in my direction, watching me as I watched them. The truck drove on to the baffle boards, executed a quick three-point turn and came back, left to right. It paused, watching. Another three-point turn, another traverse in front of me, another pause, engine running. I drank my coffee and ate a chocolate bar, wrapper stowed carefully in my pocket (the sign in a nearby lay-by, where I had parked, warned ‘Civic Amenities Act 1967 No Litter Penalty £100’).
    [Show full text]
  • California's Political Geography 2020
    February 2020 California’s Political Geography 2020 Eric McGhee Research support from Jennifer Paluch Summary With the 2020 presidential election fast approaching, attention turns to how public views may shape the outcome. California is often considered quite liberal, with strong support for the Democratic Party—but the state encompasses many people with differing political views. In this report, we examine California’s political geography to inform discussion for this election season and beyond. Our findings suggest the state continues to lean Democratic and Donald Trump is unpopular virtually everywhere. As California leans more Democratic in general, conservative Democrats are becoming rarer even in the places where they used to be common; meanwhile, independents, also known as No Party Preference voters, are leaning slightly more Republican in many parts of the state. However, many issues have their own geographic patterns: Most Californians from coast to interior feel their taxes are too high, and Californians almost everywhere believe immigrants are a benefit to the state. Concern about the cost of housing shows sharp divides between the coast and the interior, though Californians are concerned in most parts of the state. Support for the Affordable Care Act (Obamacare) is lukewarm in most places. Even as support for the Democratic Party has strengthened in general, and opinions on some policy issues have grown more polarized in parts of the state, a closer look indicates that registering all eligible residents to vote might actually moderate the more strongly partisan places. Broad Geographic Patterns Today, California is widely understood to be a solidly Democratic state. All statewide elected officials are Democrats, including both United States senators and the governor.
    [Show full text]
  • Reemerging Political Geography in Japan
    Japanese Journal of Human Geography 64―6(2012) Reemerging Political Geography in Japan YAMAZAKI Takashi Osaka City University TAKAGI Akihiko Kyushu University KITAGAWA Shinya Mie University KAGAWA Yuichi The University of Shiga Prefecture Abstract The Political Geography Research Group (PGRG) of the Human Geographical Society of Japan was established in 2011 to promote political geographic studies in Japan. The PGRG is the very first research unit on political geography in the Society which was established in 1948. Political geography was once one of the weakest sub―fields in Japanese geography with a very limited number of scholars and published works. This, however, is not at all the case now. Political geography is a reemerging field in Japan. In this review paper, four of the PGRG members contribute chapters on general trends in Japanese political geography, legacies of Japanese wartime geopolitics, the introduction of “new geopolitics” into Japan, and geographical studies on environmental movements. All of them have confirmed with confidence that Japanese political geography has been reemerging and making steady progress in terms of theory, methodology, and case study since the 1980s. Although the current stage of Japanese political geography is still in the regenerative phase, they strongly believe that political geography should be firmly embedded in Japanese geography. Key words : political geography, Japanese geopolitics, new geopolitics, environmental movements, Japan I Introduction The Political Geography Research Group (PGRG) of the Human Geographical Society of Japan was established in 2011 to promote political geographic studies in Japan. The PGRG is the very first research unit on political geography in the Society which was established in 1948.
    [Show full text]
  • Tangled Complicities and Moral Struggles: the Haushofers, Father and Son, and the Spaces of Nazi Geopolitics
    Journal of Historical Geography 47 (2015) 64e73 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Journal of Historical Geography journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/jhg Feature: European Geographers and World War II Tangled complicities and moral struggles: the Haushofers, father and son, and the spaces of Nazi geopolitics Trevor J. Barnes a,* and Christian Abrahamsson b a Department of Geography, University of British Columbia, 1984 West Mall, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z2, Canada b Department of Sociology and Human Geography, University of Oslo, Postboks 1096 Blindern, Oslo 0317, Norway Abstract Drawing on a biographical approach, the paper explores the tangled complicities and morally fraught relationship between the German father and son political geographers, Karl and Albrecht Haushofer, and the Nazi leadership. From the 1920s both Haushofers were influential within Nazism, although at different periods and under different circumstances. Karl Haushofer’s complicity began in 1919 with his friendship with Rudolf Hess, an undergraduate student he taught political geography at the University of Munich. Hess introduced Haushofer to Adolf Hitler the following year. In 1924 Karl provided jail-house instruction in German geopolitical theory to both men while they served an eight-and-a-half month prison term for treason following the ‘beer-hall putsch’ of November 1923. Karl’s prison lectures were significant because during that same period Hitler wrote Mein Kampf. In that tract, Hitler justifies German expansionism using Lebensraum, one of Haushofer’s key ideas. It is here that there is a potential link between German geopolitics and the subsequent course of the Second World War. Albrecht Haushofer’s complicity began in the 1930s when he started working as a diplomat for Joachim von Ribbentrop in a think-tank within the Nazi Foreign Ministry.
    [Show full text]
  • GEOG 1280.Pdf
    GEOG 1280 /GEOG 1200 Sept 11/2008 Lecture Outline Telling a story of human geography Origins and evolution • Universal Geography and Humboldt • Geography as Academic Discipline Universal Geography 1800-1874 •Transition from geography as servant of exploration and empire to mature academic subject •As universities spread, academic disciplines know today begin to emerge as defined fields of knowledge Alexander von Humboldt 1769-1859 “…my true purpose is to investigate the interaction of all the forces of nature.” •Dominated 19th century geography; one of most admired men of his time •Uniquely blended general concepts with precise observation •Conception of geography as an integrating science •Insistence that humans are part of nature and not separate Humboldt •Traveled extensively through Central and South America –First to write a scientific description of Latin America •5 volume work ‘Kosmos’ interaction of all natural and human forces at play in the environment •‘…the last man who knew everything’ (Johnson 2005: 3) Institutionalization •University disciplines emerge in a complex intellectual environment –Mechanistic view of ‘science’ dominates –Effects of controversial ideas of Charles Darwin •Must ‘stake claim’ by clearly defining the subject •1874 - First departments set up in German universities •1903 – First department in North America – University of Chicago Friedrich Ratzel ‘Founder of Human Geography’ •First to focus solely on human-made landscape •‘anthropogeography’ •Emphasized humans as makers of landscapes •Introduced idea
    [Show full text]
  • Track in Human Geography) Detailed Description of the Track
    Political Geography ( track in Human Geography) detailed description of the track Political Geography at the UvA means: - geopolitics, globalisation and governance (G3) - a comparative perspective on places in the global North & South - small-scale education - great diversity of students Geopolitics, globalisation and governance The Master programme Political Geography focusses on three core notions, Geopolitics, Globalization, and Governance, to explore the political geographies of our globalizing world. These pertain to the dynamics of the spatialities of politics, both domestic politics, international relations and transnational politics, as they can be understood through key geographical concepts such as territory, place, scale and network. Key political geographical themes include territorial conflicts, war and peace, polarizing mobilizations such as nationalism and religious fundamentalism, and pacification arrangements such as federalism, consocionalism and supranational integration, identities and languages, natural resources and population, finance and media. Drawing on case studies from Europe, the Americas, Africa and Asia, students will develop a nuanced and critical understanding of the literature on these political geographical themes. The programme will assess theories and methods in these dynamic fields of scholarship and students will be familiarized with the state-of-the-art of political geography and geopolitics before they start working on their thesis project in the field. Geopolitics The programme will examine the
    [Show full text]
  • The Desert of Experience: Jarhead and the Geography of the Persian Gulf War Geoffrey A
    124.5 ] The Desert of Experience: Jarhead and the Geography of the Persian Gulf War geoffrey a. wright “[T]here is no getting out of the land. No stopping. The desert is everywhere. The mirage is everywhere. I am still in the desert.” —Anthony Swofford,Jarhead Introduction EPICtIONS OF tHE PERSIAN GULF WAR IN CONtEMPORARY AMER- ican combat narratives differ dramatically from public dis- Dcourse surrounding the war. Media coverage of the war has been widely documented for its preoccupation with emergent mil- itary technologies. During the war, the Pentagon teamed up with cable networks to inundate the American public with spectacles of Stealth bombers, Scud missiles, Patriot missiles, Tomahawk missiles, and smart bombs in action. The highly censored media coverage ob- scured the region’s geography and erased the suffering of combatants as well as civilians.1 In contrast, the literature and film on the war emphasize the hu- man rather than the technological dimension of the fighting. Veterans and veteran correspondents employ a language of sensory experience to tell their stories about infantry life and combat, stories abounding with the minutiae of training, sleeping, eating, patrolling, and fight- ing. These deeply personal experiences are anchored to the landscape in numerous and peculiar ways.2 This essay sets forth a geographic semiotics of Persian Gulf War combat narratives, which entails the GEOFFREY A. WRIGHt is assistant pro- fessor of En glish at Samford University, study of an array of geographically oriented codes for making mean- where he teaches interdisciplinary film- ing out of wartime experience. The topography of the war zone, not and- literature studies.
    [Show full text]
  • A Critical Geopolitics of Observant Practice at British Military Airshows
    A critical geopolitics of observant practice at British military airshows Matthew F Rech This paper demonstrates how visual cultures of militarism take shape as part of a ‘thick’ geopolitics of being-in- place. It draws on historical accounts of, and empirical observations at, British military airshows, which it interprets via the concept of ‘observant practice’. The paper argues that the imaginative and rhetorical force of military spectacle and popular militarism are tied to its markedly enclavic spatiality, i.e. to seeing and doing in-place. By taking seriously the spatial and sensory experience of British airshows, the paper extends recent work in critical geopolitics that questions the spatialised politics of experience, and brings them into dialogue with cultural geographies of tourism. It provides a brief history of the spectacular origins of aviation and of the use of airshows to the practice of statecraft, and demonstrates how airshows are an important element in the cultural phenomenon of militarisation. The paper takes forward debates around ‘the vision thing’ in critical geopolitics by illustrating why the notion of observant practice should not be dissociated from consideration of the spaces in and through which militaries become the object of visual curiosity. It expands, therefore, the potential of observant practice as a critique of popular military cultures. Key words Britain; critical geopolitics; visual culture; observant practice; militarism; militarisation School of Geography, Politics and Sociology, Newcastle University, Newcastle, NE1 7RU Emails: [email protected]; [email protected] Revised manuscript received 25 June 2015 political and geographical philosophy centred, practi- Introduction cally and metaphorically, on the eye results in the Since the publication of O Tuathail’s (1996a) Critical sorts of visions of the world – ‘world stages’, ‘global geopolitics, debates around the visual have figured views’ – pivotal to the practical geopolitics of empire, strongly in critical studies of geopolitics.
    [Show full text]
  • GEO--Geography
    College of Arts and Sciences GEO Geography GEO 109 DIGITAL MAPPING. (3) This course introduces the concepts, techniques, and histories behind mapping as a creative and artist practice. It covers the centrality of the map in everyday life and the changing role of maps as society becomes increasingly saturated by digital information technologies such as geographic information systems (GIS) and global positioning systems (GPS). The course introduces principles in cartographic design and geovisualization culminating in a series of maps created by each student. GEO 130 EARTH’S PHYSICAL ENVIRONMENT. (3) A course exploring the fundamental characteristics of earth’s physical environment. Emphasis is placed on identifying interrelationships between atmospheric processes involving energy, pressure, and moisture, weather and climate, and terrestrial processes of vegetative biomes, soils, and landscape formation and change. Fulfills General Education requirements for Inquiry in Natural Sciences, and elementary certification requirements in education. #GEO 133 SCIENCE AND POLICY OF NATURAL HAZARDS. (3) This course examines the science of natural hazards such as hurricanes, earthquakes, landslides and floods, and the causes and effects of the natural hazards. It explores the relationships between the science of, and policy toward, such hazards, discusses their predictability, and examines how scientific knowledge influences policy-making. GEO 135 GLOBAL CLIMATE CHANGE. (3) This course provides a broad overview of the processes that have shaped the climate in which we live, and of consequences of changes to this climate. The principle functions of climate in relation to the hydrosphere and biosphere are introduced, and climate change over geological time is described. The basic data used by climate science to identify and explain historical climate change, paleoclimate change, and more recent climate trends are examined.
    [Show full text]
  • Careers and Professional Development Sessions 2019 Annual Meeting of the AAG
    Careers and Professional Development Sessions 2019 Annual Meeting of the AAG WEDNESDAY, APRIL 3 Making the Better Teacher: Pre-Service Training and Current Teachers’ Professional Development Welcome to the AAG 4:30 – 6:10 pm in Johnson, Marriott, Mezzanine Level 8:00 – 9:40 am in Wilson B, Marriott, Mezzanine Level Sponsored by Geography Education Specialty Group, Community Sponsored by Graduate Student Affinity Group, Careers and College Affinity Group, Careers and Professional Development Professional Development, American Association of Geographers Student Networking Social 4:30 – 6:10 pm in Ballroom Salon 1, Marriott, Lobby Level Career Mentoring A Sponsored by the American Association of Geographers, Careers and 9:55 – 11:35 am in Wilson B, Marriott, Mezzanine Level Professional Development Sponsored by Careers and Professional Development THURSDAY, APRIL 4 Working Abroad: International Career Opportunities for Alcohol and the Academy Geographers 8:00 – 9:40 am in Wilson B, Marriott, Mezzanine Level 12:40 – 2:20 pm in Wilson B, Marriott, Mezzanine Level Sponsored by Political Geography Specialty Group, Graduate Student Sponsored by Careers and Professional Development Affinity Group, Harassment-Free AAG Initiative, Careers and Professional Development W1_8 Do Human Geographers Need Computational Thinking Skills Geography Teacher Training and Proficiency in Geography Education 12:40 – 2:20 pm in Wilson C, Marriott, Mezzanine Level 8:00 – 9:40 am in Wilson A, Marriott, Mezzanine Level Sponsored by Careers and Professional Development
    [Show full text]