Studies on the Internal Diaspora of the Byzantine Empire (Review)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Studies on the Internal Diaspora of the Byzantine Empire (Review) Wright State University CORE Scholar History Faculty Publications History 1-2001 Studies on the Internal Diaspora of the Byzantine Empire (Review) Martin Arbagi Wright State University - Main Campus, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://corescholar.libraries.wright.edu/history Part of the History Commons Repository Citation Arbagi, M. (2001). Studies on the Internal Diaspora of the Byzantine Empire (Review). Speculum: A Journal of Medieval Studies, 76 (1), 130-132. https://corescholar.libraries.wright.edu/history/11 This Book Review is brought to you for free and open access by the History at CORE Scholar. It has been accepted for inclusion in History Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of CORE Scholar. For more information, please contact [email protected]. 130 Reviews Secondly,/Elfric was a self-consciousauthor whose interventionsin his own text, his rest- lessnesswith how he presentedthings, and his tendencyto revise and supplementdem- onstratehis authorialimagination. For IElfriccomposition was a process, not an event, and so interpretersof AElfric'stext ought alwaysto look for changes,additions, and other readingsin the manuscripts. Clemoessets forth his editorialprocedure in a succinctfour pages. For the beginning studentparticularly, as classroomuse has alreadymade clear, and for the nonspecialist there is likely to be some difficultyin coming to terms with the system of punctuation. Clemoesfollows manuscriptpunctuation, not modernpunctuation as the one-timereader or user might wish, and he assumes that the readerwill know the scholarshipon Old Englishpunctuation, for he does not mention or describehis own contributionsto the subjector those of ClaudeBarlow or BruceMitchell, among others.There will apparently be no explanatorytreatment of punctuationin the thirdvolume of the IElfricproject. This choiceto follow manuscriptpunctuation is in line with one aspectof the noninterventionist theme prevalentin the discussionsof Old Englishediting. The text then is closer to the author,here a most recognizablepresence, but the present-dayreader is fartheraway. The many interventionsin the text of A manifestlycreate all sorts of presentational problemsfor the apparatus,as Godden'snote implies,and the reader-userhad best read the section in the editorialprocedure on variantswith care. AppendixC with its list of variantreadings in late manuscriptsis helpful.Short of a directreading of the manuscript, those interestedin the many interventionsin A should consult the EEMFfacsimile. Spot checks suggest only a few minor problems.In appendixA, passage 1 (Homily 12), the readingshould be ydelnesse,not -nysse, and the headerfor passage2 (Homily 38) must want to say "see p. 519 1. 351 above";on page 105 an unnecessary"on" has crept into the firstline of the descriptionof the gammaversion. At long last, then, Anglo-Saxonstudies has an authoritativeedition of The FirstSeries, which, joining Godden'sedition of The SecondSeries and the soon-to-appearvolume of commentary,will assist the understandingof a majorwork by arguablythe majorvernac- ular prose writer of the period. Pope's SupplementarySeries will at last welcome all its mates. PAULE. SZARMACH,Western Michigan University HELENEAHRWEILER and ANGELIKIE. LAIOU,eds., Studies on the Internal Diaspora of the ByzantineEmpire. Washington, D.C.: DumbartonOaks ResearchLibrary and Collec- tion, 1998. Pp. ix, 205; maps and tables. $30. Distributedby HarvardUniversity Press, 79 GardenSt., Cambridge,MA 02138. For millenniaempires have systematicallypracticed forced transfers of populationsfrom one region to anotherwithin their borders.The most familiarexamples are biblical:the Ten Lost Tribesof Israel,uprooted by the Assyrians,and the BabylonianCaptivity of the Judaeans.At other times, membersof a group in searchof betteropportunities have vol- untarilyleft theirhomeland for differentregions under the samegovernment. Whether the resettlementis voluntaryor involuntary,such movementsare called "internaldiasporas." The peoples affectedmay retaintheir cohesiveness(as did the Judaeans),or they may be assimilatedinto the surroundingculture and lose their identities(which is probablywhat happenedto the Lost Tribes). Studieson the InternalDiaspora of the ByzantineEmpire is a collectionof articles,some traditional,others using new methodologies,presented originally at a DumbartonOaks symposiumin 1993, thoughnot publisheduntil 1998. The collectionbegins with an intro- duction by Helene Ahrweiler,"Byzantine Concepts of the Foreigner."Ahrweiler empha- sizes attitudestoward nomads.Presumably this is on the theorythat beforewe can study Reviews 131 the internal"other" we must know what Byzantinesthought of the externalalien, but I was left thinkingthat the connectionof Ahrweiler'sprefatory essay with the book's theme is tenuous. The first main article is by Michael McCormick,"The ImperialEdge: Italo-Byzantine Identity,Movement, and Integration,A.D. 650-950." McCormickmakes use of two new and radicallydifferent methodologies. Noting that "Byzantine"identity can be socially constructed,he points out how Italo-Byzantinescould readilybe distinguishedfrom other Italiansby such things as personalnames and the way they cut their hair. Changesboth of name and of hair style often followed changesin politicalaffiliation. But groupidentity is also frequentlygrounded in thingsbeyond the reachof language,custom, or othersocial constructs.McCormick shows how the frequencyof beta-thalassemia(a formof sickle-cell anemia) in modern Italy correspondswith regions occupied by Byzantiumin the early Middle Ages. As the recent excitementover ThomasJefferson's descendants has shown, blood types, inheriteddiseases, and other geneticdata can yield valuableclues to ancestry. The secondmajor article, by Nina Garsoian,"The Problem of ArmenianIntegration into the ByzantineEmpire," is more traditional.She does not intend to break new ground, insteadpresenting a summaryof what scholarshiphas establishedand the problemsthat remainto be resolved.In the formercategory Garsoian concludes that the Armenianswere the largestnon-Greek minority throughout the historyof the ByzantineEmpire; they were present in most provinces,including Byzantine Italy; their presencein Constantinople, thoughreasonably certain, is not as well documentedas for the provinces;Armenians were integratedinto imperialsociety mostly throughthe military;and the majorsource of fric- tion was religiousdifferences between the Armeniansand the Chalcedonianmajority of the empire. Beyondthose five points,the consensusbreaks down. Garsoianobserves that therecould be at times divergencesbetween the Armenianpolicies of churchand state. In general,the state'sattitude toward the Armenianswas "generallyless uniformthan that of the church, [and] oscillatedbetween the tolerancerequired to accommodatethe multiculturalnature of the empireand attemptsto impose dogmatichomogeneity" (p. 84). Like McCormick, Garsoiantraces how some Armeniansattempted to assimilate,while otherspreserved their identitythrough such thingsas religion,nomenclature, language, and dress.She concludes that the Armeniansbecame increasingly unassimilable after 1100, with a brief exception underManuel I (1158-80). McCormick'sand Garsoian'sarticles, which take up most of the book, are followed by threeshorter essays. StephenReinert's article, "The Muslim Presence in Constantinople,9th-15th Centuries: SomePreliminary Observations," suffers from two problems.The articledeals largely with Muslimmerchants from outsidethe imperialborders-Arabs, Persians,Turks-and pris- oners of war; this strainsthe definitionof internaldiaspora. The second problem is the lack of evidence.We know almost nothingof Muslimsin most of the empire,though the Muslimcommunity in Constantinopleis slightlybetter documented. A largenumber of these Muslims,especially in the ninth and tenth centuries,were pris- onersof war. Suchprisoners were usuallywell treatedand permittedto observetheir faith, includingdietary restrictions. A mosque was providedfor them in Constantinople.In a rareglimpse of Muslimlife outside the capital,Reinert cites evidencefor mosquesin pro- vincialinternment camps as well. The evidencefor the other largegroup of Muslims-merchants-is equallyscanty. The Book of the Eparchtells us that therewere "Syrian"merchants in Constantinoplein the tenth century,many of them long-termresidents. Reinert concedes that some may have been ArabChristians, but "it is just as plausiblethat manywere Muslims"(p. 133). Other than the businessregulations that affectedsuch merchantsand that they had a mosque, 132 Reviews almost nothing is known about them. The mosque was closed by Basil II but reopened underConstantine VIII. Was it the sameone providedfor Muslimprisoners of war?Reinert does not-perhaps becauseof the lack of data cannot-tell us. A treaty with Saladinin the late 1180s providedfor a secondmosque in Constantinople.The mosquemay (or may not) have been in a neighborhoodof Muslim tradersthat was destroyedby Italiansin 1203, just before Constantinopleitself was sacked by the Fourth Crusade.There is no "secureevidence" of Muslim inhabitantsin Constantinopleduring the Latin occupation. Afterhis reconquestof the capital,Michael Palaeologus restored the Muslimquarter and at least one mosque. PatriarchAthanasius wrote a famous letterto EmperorAndronicus II between 1304 and 1309 demandingthat all Muslimsbe expelledfrom Constantinople or at least that the muezzinsin the mosque be silenced. Andronicusignored
Recommended publications
  • Journeys to Byzantium? Roman Senators Between Rome and Constantinople
    Journeys to Byzantium? Roman Senators Between Rome and Constantinople Master’s Thesis Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Arts in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Michael Anthony Carrozzo, B.A Graduate Program in History The Ohio State University 2010 Thesis Committee: Kristina Sessa, Advisor Timothy Gregory Anthony Kaldellis Copyright by Michael Anthony Carrozzo 2010 Abstract For over a thousand years, the members of the Roman senatorial aristocracy played a pivotal role in the political and social life of the Roman state. Despite being eclipsed by the power of the emperors in the first century BC, the men who made up this order continued to act as the keepers of Roman civilization for the next four hundred years, maintaining their traditions even beyond the disappearance of an emperor in the West. Despite their longevity, the members of the senatorial aristocracy faced an existential crisis following the Ostrogothic conquest of the Italian peninsula, when the forces of the Byzantine emperor Justinian I invaded their homeland to contest its ownership. Considering the role they played in the later Roman Empire, the disappearance of the Roman senatorial aristocracy following this conflict is a seminal event in the history of Italy and Western Europe, as well as Late Antiquity. Two explanations have been offered to explain the subsequent disappearance of the Roman senatorial aristocracy. The first involves a series of migrations, beginning before the Gothic War, from Italy to Constantinople, in which members of this body abandoned their homes and settled in the eastern capital.
    [Show full text]
  • Ravenna Its Role in Earlier Medieval Change and Exchange
    Ravenna its role in earlier medieval change and exchange Ravenna its role in earlier medieval change and exchange Edited by Judith Herrin and Jinty Nelson LONDON INSTITUTE OF HISTORICAL RESEARCH Published by UNIVERSITY OF LONDON SCHOOL OF ADVANCED STUDY INSTITUTE OF HISTORICAL RESEARCH Senate House, Malet Street, London WC1E 7HU First published in print in 2016 (ISBN 978‑1‑909646‑14‑8) This book is published under a Creative Commons Attribution‑ NonCommercial‑NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY‑ NCND 4.0) license. More information regarding CC licenses is available at https://creativecommons.org/licenses/ Available to download free at http://www.humanities‑digital‑library.org ISBN 978‑1‑909646‑72‑8 (PDF edition) DOI: 10.14296/917.9781909646728 iv Contents Acknowledgements vii List of contributors ix List of illustrations xiii Abbreviations xvii Introduction 1 Judith Herrin and Jinty Nelson 1. A tale of two cities: Rome and Ravenna under Gothic rule 15 Peter Heather 2. Episcopal commemoration in late fifth‑century Ravenna 39 Deborah M. Deliyannis 3. Production, promotion and reception: the visual culture of Ravenna between late antiquity and the middle ages 53 Maria Cristina Carile 4. Ravenna in the sixth century: the archaeology of change 87 Carola Jäggi 5. The circulation of marble in the Adriatic Sea at the time of Justinian 111 Yuri A. Marano 6. Social instability and economic decline of the Ostrogothic community in the aftermath of the imperial victory: the papyri evidence 133 Salvatore Cosentino 7. A striking evolution: the mint of Ravenna during the early middle ages 151 Vivien Prigent 8. Roman law in Ravenna 163 Simon Corcoran 9.
    [Show full text]
  • Your Name Your
    Vedran Bileta ON THE FRINGES OF THE SHRINKING EMPIRE THE MILITARIZATION OF ADMINISTRATION AND SOCIETY IN BYZANTINE HISTRIA MA Thesis in Medieval Studies CEU eTD Collection Central European University Budapest May 2010 i CEU eTD Collection ii ON THE FRINGES OF THE SHRINKING EMPIRE THE MILITARIZATION OF ADMINISTRATION AND SOCIETY IN BYZANTINE HISTRIA by Vedran Bileta (Croatia) Thesis submitted to the Department of Medieval Studies, Central European University, Budapest, in partial fulfillment of the requirements of the Master of Arts degree in Medieval Studies Accepted in conformance with the standards of the CEU ____________________________________________ Chair, Examination Committee ____________________________________________ Thesis Supervisor CEU eTD Collection ____________________________________________ Examiner ____________________________________________ iii Examiner Budapest May 2010 CEU eTD Collection iv ON THE FRINGES OF THE SHRINKING EMPIRE THE MILITARIZATION OF ADMINISTRATION AND SOCIETY IN BYZANTINE HISTRIA by Vedran Bileta (Croatia) Thesis submitted to the Department of Medieval Studies, Central European University, Budapest, in partial fulfillment of the requirements of the Master of Arts degree in Medieval Studies Accepted in conformance with the standards of the CEU ____________________________________________ External Examiner CEU eTD Collection Budapest May 2010 v ON THE FRINGES OF THE SHRINKING EMPIRE THE MILITARIZATION OF ADMINISTRATION AND SOCIETY IN BYZANTINE HISTRIA by Vedran Bileta (Croatia) Thesis submitted to
    [Show full text]
  • The Armies of Belisarius and Narses
    1 O’ROURKE: ARMIES OF BELISARIUS AND NARSES ARROW-STORMS AND CAVALRY PIKES WARFARE IN THE AGE OF JUSTINIAN I, AD 527-565 THE ARMIES OF BELISARIUS AND NARSES by Michael O’Rourke mjor (at) velocitynet (dot) com (dot) au Canberra Australia September 2009 1. Introduction: “Rhomanya” 2. Troop Numbers 3. Troop Types 4. Tactics 5. Selected Battles 6. Appendix: Arrows, Armour and Flesh “Rhomanya”: The Christian Roman Empire of the Greeks Having been conquered by the Romans, the Aramaic- and Greek-speaking Eastern Mediterranean lived for centuries under imperial rule. Its people had received full citizenship already in 212 AD. So the East Romans naturally called themselves Rhomaioi, the Greek for ‘Romans’. The term Rhomanya [Greek hê Rhômanía:‘Ρ ω µ α ν ’ι α ] was in use already in the 300s (Brown 1971: 41). Middle period examples denoting the ‘Eastern’ Empire are found in the 600s - as in the Doctrina Jacobi - and in the 800s in various entries in the chronicle of Theophanes (fl. 810: e.g. his entry for AD 678). Although we do not find the name Rhômanía in Procopius, fl. AD 550, or in Anna Comnena, fl. 1133, it does occur in the writings of emperor Constantine Porphyrogenitus, fl. 955. The later medieval West, after AD 800, preferred the style ‘Greek Empire’. After 1204 the Latins used the term Romania to refer generally to the Empire and more specifically to the lower Balkans (thus English ‘Rumney wine’, Italian vino di Romania). Our own name Rumania/Romania, for the state on the northern side of the Danube, was chosen in 1859.
    [Show full text]
  • Byzantium in Dialogue with the Mediterranean
    Byzantium in Dialogue with the Mediterranean - 978-90-04-39358-5 Downloaded from Brill.com11/09/2020 07:50:13PM via free access <UN> The Medieval Mediterranean peoples, economies and cultures, 400–1500 Managing Editor Frances Andrews (St. Andrews) Editors Tamar Herzig (Tel Aviv) Paul Magdalino (St. Andrews) Larry J. Simon (Western Michigan University) Daniel Lord Smail (Harvard University) Jo Van Steenbergen (Ghent University) Advisory Board David Abulafia (Cambridge) Benjamin Arbel (Tel Aviv) Hugh Kennedy (soas, London) volume 116 The titles published in this series are listed at brill.com/mmed - 978-90-04-39358-5 Downloaded from Brill.com11/09/2020 07:50:13PM via free access <UN> Byzantium in Dialogue with the Mediterranean History and Heritage Edited by Daniëlle Slootjes Mariëtte Verhoeven leiden | boston - 978-90-04-39358-5 Downloaded from Brill.com11/09/2020 07:50:13PM via free access <UN> Cover illustration: Abbasid Caliph al-Mamun sends an envoy to Byzantine Emperor Theophilos, Skyllitzes Matritensis, Unknown, 13th-century author, detail. With kind permission of the Biblioteca Nacional de España. Image editing: Centre for Art Historical Documentation (CKD), Radboud University Nijmegen. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Names: Slootjes, Daniëlle, editor. | Verhoeven, Mariëtte, editor. Title: Byzantium in dialogue with the Mediterranean : history and heritage / edited by Daniëlle Slootjes, Mariëtte Verhoeven. Description: Leiden ; Boston : Brill, [2019] | Series: The medieval Mediterranean : peoples, economies and cultures, 400-1500, issn 0928-5520; volume 116 | Includes bibliographical references and index. Identifiers: lccn 2018061267 (print) | lccn 2019001368 (ebook) | isbn 9789004393585 (ebook) | isbn 9789004392595 (hardback : alk. paper) Subjects: lcsh: Byzantine Empire--Relations--Europe, Western.
    [Show full text]
  • The Romanness of Byzantine Southern Italy (9Th-11Th Centuries) Annick Peters-Custot
    Between Rome and Constantinople: The Romanness of Byzantine southern Italy (9th-11th centuries) Annick Peters-Custot To cite this version: Annick Peters-Custot. Between Rome and Constantinople: The Romanness of Byzantine southern Italy (9th-11th centuries). W. Pohl, Cl. Gantner, C. Grifoni, M. Pollheimer-Mohaupt. Transfor- mations of Romanness. Early Medieval Regions and Identities, De Gruyter, pp.231 - 240, 2018, Millenium-Studien/Millenium Studies, 10.1515/9783110598384-016. halshs-03326361 HAL Id: halshs-03326361 https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-03326361 Submitted on 25 Aug 2021 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Annick Peters-Custot Between Rome and Constantinople: the Romanness of Byzantine southern Italy (9th –11th centuries) Medieval Southern Italy and Sicily hosted the three monotheisms, the two main spheres of Christianity, Roman and Oriental, an Islamic polity, two empires, princi- palities, and many different kingdoms: the most important political entities and the main communities of the medieval Mediterranean coexisted in a restricted area. It is no wonder that this zone is nowadays considered as a laboratory for the analysis of medieval Mediterranean communities: Norman ethnogenesis, Greek iden- tity and communities, Sicilian ‘Mozarabs’ and Sicilian Arab-speaking Jews, the con- cepts of identity and of community.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Free at ISBN 978‑1‑909646‑72‑8 (PDF Edition) DOI: 10.14296/917.9781909646728
    Ravenna its role in earlier medieval change and exchange Ravenna its role in earlier medieval change and exchange Edited by Judith Herrin and Jinty Nelson LONDON INSTITUTE OF HISTORICAL RESEARCH Published by UNIVERSITY OF LONDON SCHOOL OF ADVANCED STUDY INSTITUTE OF HISTORICAL RESEARCH Senate House, Malet Street, London WC1E 7HU First published in print in 2016 (ISBN 978‑1‑909646‑14‑8) This book is published under a Creative Commons Attribution‑ NonCommercial‑NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY‑ NCND 4.0) license. More information regarding CC licenses is available at https://creativecommons.org/licenses/ Available to download free at http://www.humanities‑digital‑library.org ISBN 978‑1‑909646‑72‑8 (PDF edition) DOI: 10.14296/917.9781909646728 iv Contents Acknowledgements vii List of contributors ix List of illustrations xiii Abbreviations xvii Introduction 1 Judith Herrin and Jinty Nelson 1. A tale of two cities: Rome and Ravenna under Gothic rule 15 Peter Heather 2. Episcopal commemoration in late fifth‑century Ravenna 39 Deborah M. Deliyannis 3. Production, promotion and reception: the visual culture of Ravenna between late antiquity and the middle ages 53 Maria Cristina Carile 4. Ravenna in the sixth century: the archaeology of change 87 Carola Jäggi 5. The circulation of marble in the Adriatic Sea at the time of Justinian 111 Yuri A. Marano 6. Social instability and economic decline of the Ostrogothic community in the aftermath of the imperial victory: the papyri evidence 133 Salvatore Cosentino 7. A striking evolution: the mint of Ravenna during the early middle ages 151 Vivien Prigent 8. Roman law in Ravenna 163 Simon Corcoran 9.
    [Show full text]
  • Chronological Overview
    Chronological Overview 284-305 Diocletian and the tetrarchy 565-591 Wars with Persia 306-337 Constantine I (sole ruler from 324) 566 + Slavs begin to infiltrate across Danube frontier; pressure 311 Edict of toleration issued by Galerius on frontier fortresses from Avars 312 Constantine's victory at the Milvian bridge 568+ Lombards driven westward from Danube, invade Italy 313 Edict of toleration issued by Constantine and Licinius 572 Lombards besiege Ravenna 325 Council of Nicaea and condemnation of Arianism (first 577 Major invasion of Balkans led by Avars ecumenical council) 584, 586 Avaro-Slav attacks on Thessalonica 330 Consecration of Constantinople 591-602 Gradual success in pushing Avars back across Danube 337 Baptism and death of Constantine I 602 Maurice overthrown, Phokas proclaimed emperor 361-363 Julian the Apostate leads pagan reaction and attempts to 603 War with Persia; situation in Balkans deteriorates limit the influence of Christianity 610 Phokas overthrown by Heraclius, son of exarch of Africa 364 Jovian dies: empire divided between Valentinian 1 (West) at Carthage and Valens (East) 611-620s Central and northern Balkans lost 378 Defeat and death of Valens at hands of Visigoths at battle 614-619 Persians occupy Syria, Palestine and Egypt of Adrianople 622 Mohammed leaves Mecca for Medina (the 'Hijra') 381 First Council of Constantinople (second ecumenical 622-627 Heraclius campaigns in east against Persians council): reaffirms rejection of Arianism; asserts right of 626 Combined Avaro-Slav and Persian siege of Constantinople
    [Show full text]
  • Warren Treadgold
    WARREN TREADGOLD Department of History Saint Louis University 3800 Lindell Boulevard Saint Louis, MO 63108 office telephone (314) 977-2910 office FAX (314) 977-1603 home telephone (314) 862-2886 email [email protected] EDUCATION Ph.D. in Byzantine Greek, Harvard University, 1977 (dissertation: "The Nature of the Bibliotheca of Photius"; advisers: Ihor Ševčenko and Herbert Bloch) A.B. magna cum laude in Medieval History and Literature, Harvard University, 1970 (senior thesis: "Arianism as a Force in Politics, 429-587," awarded Cumming Prize for best thesis in History and Literature; advisers: Angeliki Laiou and Caroline Bynum) TEACHING AND RESEARCH POSITIONS 1997- : Saint Louis University: National Endowment for the Humanities Professor of Byzantine Studies and Professor of History 1988-97: Florida International University: Professor of History 1991-97, Associate Professor of History 1990-91, Assistant Professor of History 1988-90; Fellow, Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars and Research Fellow, National Endowment for the Humanities 1996-97; Earhart Research Fellow 1992-93; Visiting Fellow, All Souls College, Oxford 1988-89 1983-88: Hillsdale College: Assistant Professor of History; Research Fellow, National Endowment for the Humanities 1987; Visiting Assistant Professor of History and Classics, University of California at Berkeley 1986 1982-83: Free University of Berlin: Alexander von Humboldt Research Fellow 1980-82: Stanford University: Mellon Research Fellow and Visiting Lecturer in History and Classics 1978-80: University of Munich: Alexander von Humboldt Research Fellow 1977-78: University of California at Los Angeles: Visiting Lecturer in Classics BOOKS Studies in Byzantine Cultural History (Florilegium magistrorum historiae archaeologiaeque Antiquitatis et Medii Aevii 19, Editura Academiei Romȃne and Editura Istros, Bucharest and Brăila, 2016), pp.
    [Show full text]
  • Rome and Constantinople, Popes and Patriarchs, 1204-1453
    UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA Los Angeles Empires Reshaped and Reimagined: Rome and Constantinople, Popes and Patriarchs, 1204-1453 A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy in History by Natalie Sherwan 2016 © Copyright by Natalie Sherwan 2016 ABSTRACT OF THE DISSERTATION Empires Reshaped and Reimagined: Rome and Constantinople, Popes and Patriarchs, 1204-1453 by Natalie Sherwan Doctor of Philosophy, History University of California, Los Angeles, 2016 Professor Patrick Geary, Co-chair Professor Claudia Rapp, Co-chair This dissertation discusses the politics of conquest and the strategies of legitimization pursued by Latin, Greek and Slav contenders for hegemonic rule in the northeastern Mediterranean after the collapse of the Byzantine Empire in the wake of the fourth crusade. It reevaluates the relationship between the concepts of empire and Christendom as played out in the process of political realignment, and closely examines the ways in which the key actors claiming to represent these concepts - emperors, popes, patriarchs - fought or cooperated with one another in order to assert regional preeminence. ii The first part of the dissertation focuses on the tension between the Roman/Byzantine ideal of universalism, which entailed a sole holder of imperial power, and the concrete reality of several empires coexisting within the same geographical area. Chapters one and two provide a survey of the main theoretical issues encountered in the study of medieval empires, and an assessment of the relationship between Byzantine basileis, patriarchs, popes and Western emperors prior to 1204. Chapters three and four investigate the competing but interconnected ruling systems which emerged in the Balkans, the Aegean and Asia Minor after 1204, tracing their policies of war and appeasement until the recovery of Constantinople by the Nicene Greeks in 1261.
    [Show full text]
  • Theotokis, Georgios (2010) the Campaigns of the Norman Dukes of Southern Italy Against Byzantium, in the Years Between 1071 and 1108 AD
    Theotokis, Georgios (2010) The campaigns of the Norman dukes of southern Italy against Byzantium, in the years between 1071 and 1108 AD. PhD thesis. http://theses.gla.ac.uk/1884/ Copyright and moral rights for this thesis are retained by the Author A copy can be downloaded for personal non-commercial research or study, without prior permission or charge This thesis cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the Author The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the Author When referring to this work, full bibliographic details including the author, title, awarding institution and date of the thesis must be given Glasgow Theses Service http://theses.gla.ac.uk/ [email protected] The topic of my thesis is “The campaigns of the Norman dukes of southern Italy to Byzantium, in the years between 1071 and 1108 A.D.” As the title suggests, I am examining all the main campaigns conducted by the Normans against Byzantine provinces, in the period from the fall of Bari, the Byzantine capital of Apulia and the seat of the Byzantine governor (catepano) of Italy in 1071, to the Treaty of Devol that marked the end of Bohemond of Taranto’s Illyrian campaign in 1108. My thesis, however, aims to focus specifically on the military aspects of these confrontations, an area which for this period has been surprisingly neglected in the existing secondary literature. My intention is to give answers to a series of questions, of which
    [Show full text]
  • An Analysis of Byzantine Imperial Geography a Dissertation Submitted
    University of Nevada Axis Mundi: An Analysis of Byzantine Imperial Geography A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the Requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Geography by Richard Allen Catlin III Paul Starrs, PhD Advisor and Committee Chair May 2014 © Copyright by Richard Allen Catlin III, 2014 All Rights Reserved THE GRADUATE SCHOOL We recommend that the dissertation prepared under our supervision by Richard Allen Catlin III entitled Axis Mundi: An Analysis of Byzantine Imperial Geography be accepted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Paul Starrs, PhD, Advisor and Committee Chair Elliott Parker, PhD, Committee Member Scott Bassett, DDes, Committee Member Nigel Allan, PhD, Committee Member Margaret Ferrara, PhD, Graduate School Representative David Zeh, PhD, Dean of the Graduate School i ABSTRACT This work is a geopolitical analysis of the Byzantine Empire’s method of governance, expansion, and imperial administration over the lands it chose to inhabit. While no single scholar or then-contemporary Byzantine author has articulated a specific policy of geostrategy in the Byzantine Empire, this dissertation demonstrates an overt bias in Byzantine military and diplomatic operations toward coastal regions and maintenance of their physical control within the Mediterranean Basin. These imperial choices were fueled largely by: 1) the reigning geopolitical model of the Byzantine Empire; 2) the importance of the capital, today’s Istanbul (then Byzantium, and later, Constantinople); 3) the distribution of other major cities of the Empire; and 4) the maritime-based trade economy of the Byzantine Empire. ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I must start by acknowledging the faith and confidence that Dr.
    [Show full text]