DOCSLIB.ORG

Midtown Corridor Historic Bridge Study

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Midtown Corridor Historic Bridge Study Midtown Corridor Historic Bridge Study Prepared for: Public Works Department City of Minneapolis, Minnesota ___ __, 2007 Prepared by: Project No. 13200.000 SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA _____ __, 2007 Midtown Corridor Historic Bridge Study Final Report Public Works Department City of Minneapolis, Minnesota CERTIFICATIONS I hereby certify that this report, except those sections specifically listed elsewhere in these certifications, was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. James J. Bellefeuille, P.E. / / Lic. No. 20662 I hereby certify that the sections of this report identified as having been prepared by me were prepared under my direct supervision and that I meet the Secretary of the Interior's Professional Qualifications Standards for Historian and Architectural Historian Charlene Roise / / Midtown Corridor Historic Bridge Study Final Report Midtown Corridor Historic Bridge Study Final Report Public Works Department City of Minneapolis, Minnesota TABLE OF CONTENTS I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY.................................................................................................1 A. Purpose of and Contributors to the Study................................................................1 B. The Historic District ................................................................................................1 C. Structural Evaluation ...............................................................................................2 D. Current Repair Practices and Feasible New Technologies......................................2 E. Recommendations for Each Bridge, Timeline, and Cost Estimate..........................2 F. Bridge Removal and Impact on the Historic District...............................................3 G. Conclusions..............................................................................................................4 H. Subsequent Steps.....................................................................................................5 II. INTRODUCTION ...............................................................................................................6 A. Project Overview.....................................................................................................6 1. Purpose of the Study ................................................................................... 6 2. Definitions of the Midtown Corridor, Midtown Greenway, and the Historic District........................................................................................... 6 3. Contributors to This Study.......................................................................... 7 B. Bridges Included in the Study..................................................................................8 C. Selection of Bridges for the Study...........................................................................8 D. Research Methods....................................................................................................9 1. Structural Evaluation .................................................................................. 9 2. Historic Study............................................................................................. 9 E. Subsequent Steps.....................................................................................................9 III. CHICAGO MILWAUKEE AND ST. PAUL RAILROAD GRADE SEPARATION HISTORIC DISTRICT ........................................................................................................9 A. Defining Characteristics of the Historic District .....................................................9 B. Origin of the Grade Separation..............................................................................10 C. Original Construction Methods and Materials.......................................................19 Midtown Corridor Historic Bridge Study i Final Report IV. POTENTIAL TRANSIT WITHIN THE RAIL CORRIDOR ...........................................23 A. Light Rail Transit...................................................................................................26 1. Alignment Needs...................................................................................... 26 2. Double Track............................................................................................ 26 3. Platform Arrangements............................................................................. 29 4. Pedestrian Circulation and Access............................................................ 29 5. Impacts to the Greenway Trail.................................................................. 29 B. Modern StreetCar...................................................................................................30 C. Busway...................................................................................................................30 D. Potential Transit—Conclusions.............................................................................30 V. STRUCTURAL EVALUATION......................................................................................30 A. Overview................................................................................................................30 1. Goals ......................................................................................................... 30 2. Methodology of Analysis.......................................................................... 31 3. Available Information............................................................................... 31 B. Description of Bridge Types and Criteria Thresholds ...........................................31 C. Bridge Type Summary...........................................................................................32 1. Cast-in-Place Concrete T-Beams (Structure Type 1) ............................... 32 2. Continuous Concrete Slab Span (Structure Type 2)................................. 32 3. Steel Beam (Structure Type 3).................................................................. 32 4. Post Tensioned Continuous Concrete Slab Span (Structure Type 4) ....... 33 5. Culvert (Structure Type 5)........................................................................ 33 6. Prestressed Concrete Beam and Slab Span (Structure Type 6) ................ 33 7. Concrete Frames (Structure Type 7)......................................................... 33 D. Structural Analysis of Five Representative Bridges ..............................................34 1. Evaluation Process.................................................................................... 34 a. Bridge L8901, Fremont Avenue South..........................................36 b. Bridge L89081, Pleasant Avenue ..................................................44 c. Bridge L8913, Columbus Avenue .................................................50 d. Bridge L8915, 10th Avenue South ................................................56 e. Bridge L8923, 18th Avenue South ................................................61 2. Conclusions............................................................................................... 66 Midtown Corridor Historic Bridge Study ii Final Report VI. CURRENT REPAIR PRACTICES AND NEW TECHNOLOGIES................................66 A. Current Practices....................................................................................................66 1. Shotcrete ................................................................................................... 66 2. Deck Area Patching (Partial- and Full-Depth).......................................... 67 3. Epoxy Injection of Cracks ........................................................................ 67 4. Low Viscosity Sealants and Silane Surface Sealers ................................. 68 5. Deck Drainage Improvements .................................................................. 69 6. Membrane With Asphalt Overlay............................................................. 69 7. Mill and Overlay of Road Surface............................................................ 70 8. High Performance Concrete...................................................................... 70 B. New Technologies.................................................................................................71 1. Reinforcing Bars....................................................................................... 71 a. Steel Bars With Metallic Coating and Alternative Solid Metal Bars ............................................................................71 b. Prefabricated Fusion Bonded Epoxy Coated Reinforcing Bars ............................................................................72 2. Cathodic Protection................................................................................... 72 3. Electrochemical Extraction (ECE)............................................................ 73 4. Strengthening Using Carbon Fiber Reinforced Polymer (CFRP)............. 73 C. CASE STUDIES....................................................................................................74 1. Bridge L8901 - Fremont Avenue.............................................................. 74 2. Bridge L8915 - 10th Avenue .................................................................... 75 3. Bridge L8923 - 18th Avenue .................................................................... 76 VII. RECOMMENDATIONS FOR EACH BRIDGE, TIMELINE,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A Study of Bicycle Commuting in Minneapolis: How Much Do Bicycle-Oriented Paths
    A STUDY OF BICYCLE COMMUTING IN MINNEAPOLIS: HOW MUCH DO BICYCLE-ORIENTED PATHS INCREASE RIDERSHIP AND WHAT CAN BE DONE TO FURTHER USE? by EMMA PACHUTA A THESIS Presented to the Department of Planning, Public Policy and Management and the Graduate School of the University of Oregon in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of 1-1aster of Community and Regional Planning June 2010 11 ''A Study of Bicycle Commuting in Minneapolis: How Much do Bicycle-Oriented Paths Increase Ridership and What Can be Done to Further Use?" a thesis prepared by Emma R. Pachuta in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Master of Community and Regional Planning degree in the Department of Planning, Public Policy and Management. This thesis has been approved and accepted by: - _ Dr. Jean oclcard, Chair of the ~_ . I) .).j}(I) Date {).:........:::.=...-.-/---------'-------'-----.~--------------- Committee in Charge: Dr. Jean Stockard Dr. Marc Schlossberg, AICP Lisa Peterson-Bender, AICP Accepted by: 111 An Abstract of the Thesis of Emma Pachuta for the degree of Master of Community and Regional Planning in the Department of Planning, Public Policy and Management to be taken June 2010 Title: A STUDY OF BICYCLE COMMUTING IN MINNEAPOLIS: HOW MUCH DO BICYCLE-ORIENTED PATHS INCREASE RIDERSHIP AND WHAT CAN BE DONE TO FURTHER USE? Approved: _~~ _ Dr. Jean"'stockard Car use has become the dominant form of transportation, contributing to the health, environmental, and sprawl issues our nation is facing. Alternative modes of transport within urban environments are viable options in alleviating many of these problems. This thesis looks the habits and trends of bicyclists along the Midtown Greenway, a bicycle/pedestrian pathway that runs through Minneapolis, Minnesota and questions whether implementing non-auto throughways has encouraged bicyclists to bike further and to more destinations since its completion in 2006.
    [Show full text]
  • To Read the Nokomis Messenger Article About Becketwood Composting
    AUGUST 2012 Vol. 29 No. 6 21,000 Circulation Your Neighborhood Newspaper For Over Twenty Years extensive community outreach, soliciting input on redevelopment of the Hiawatha Corridor. ‘Elevated Beer’ to “Not one responder ever said that we need another liquor store,” Krause said, “not one. No INSIDE one feels our community is un- derserviced in that area.” bring craft beer, wine A current ordinance states that no liquor store may operate within 300 feet of a church or Features.........2 school. Krause said the intention to Hiawatha this fall is to separate consumption of al- cohol from children. But that or- dinance does not cover daycare centers, and one is two doors away from the proposed liquor store and will share its parking lot. “The daycare owner is Mus- lim, and had he known a liquor store would be adjacent, he Eco-friendly policies wouldn’t have opened there,” Krause said. at Becketwood “I don’t want or need another competitor, but beyond that, there are better uses for that retail space,” Krause continued. “But as a landlord, the building owner News..................3 has a mortgage to pay and needs to rent to anyone willing to pay rent. I see both sides. No one is evil in this issue.” Another Longfellow business owner said he had concerns with panhandlers and transients in the area, but he blames the city for not including daycare centers under its ordinance. As for Adam Aded, owner of Xcel releases Ruwayda Child Care Center, he Craft beer and wine lovers in the Longfellow area will have another source to choose from when Elevated Beer, indicated that he is not against substation design Wine and Spirits opens this fall at 4135 Hiawatha Ave.
    [Show full text]
  • The Midtown Greenway and the Social Landscape of Minneapolis, Minnesota
    Macalester College DigitalCommons@Macalester College Geography Honors Projects Geography Department Spring 2010 A Greenway Runs Through it: The idtM own Greenway and the Social Landscape of Minneapolis, Minnesota Aaron M. Brown Macalester College, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.macalester.edu/geography_honors Part of the Human Geography Commons, Urban, Community and Regional Planning Commons, Urban Studies Commons, and the Urban Studies and Planning Commons Recommended Citation Brown, Aaron M., "A Greenway Runs Through it: The idtM own Greenway and the Social Landscape of Minneapolis, Minnesota" (2010). Geography Honors Projects. Paper 21. http://digitalcommons.macalester.edu/geography_honors/21 This Honors Project - Open Access is brought to you for free and open access by the Geography Department at DigitalCommons@Macalester College. It has been accepted for inclusion in Geography Honors Projects by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@Macalester College. For more information, please contact [email protected]. A Greenway Runs Through it: The Midtown Greenway and the Social Landscape of Minneapolis, Minnesota Aaron Brown April 19, 2010 Honors Thesis Advisor: Dr. Laura Smith Department of Geography Macalester College Abstract Minneapolis‟ Midtown Greenway is a 5.5 mile bicycle and pedestrian corridor that replaced a grade-separated railroad line in 2000 and expanded to its current length in 2007. In an era of reinvestment in American inner cities and a heightened political awareness of both urban transportation alternatives and public spaces, the academic field of geography has much to contribute to the discussion about the viability, effectiveness, and success of projects such as this adaptive reuse of reclaimed, deindustrialized space.
    [Show full text]
  • Hiawatha HVTL CON Ap
    Appendix E.2 Cultural Resources Analysis of Effects for the Xcel Energy Hiawatha Project CULTURAL RESOURCES ANALYSIS OF EFFECTS FOR THE XCEL ENERGY HIAWATHA PROJECT, MINNEAPOLIS, HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA PREPARED FOR NATURAL RESOURCES GROUP LLC AND XCEL ENERGY SERVICES, INC. PREPARED BY and March 2010 Appendix E.2; Application for Certificate of Need; E002/CN-10-694; Page 1 of 116 Cultural Resources Analysis of Effects for the Xcel Energy Hiawatha Project, Minneapolis, Hennepin County, Minnesota Prepared for: Natural Resource Group, LLC 1000 IDS Center 80 South 8th Street Minneapolis, MN 55402 Xcel Energy Services, Inc. 414 Nicollet Mall Minneapolis, MN 55401 Prepared by: Stark Preservation Planning LLC www.StarkPreservation.com and Summit Envirosolutions, Inc. www.Summite.com Report Authors: William E. Stark, M.A., Stark Preservation Planning LLC Andrea C. Vermeer, Ph.D. RPA, Summit Envirosolutions Inc. March 2010 Appendix E.2; Application for Certificate of Need; E002/CN-10-694; Page 2 of 116 Management Summary In March 2010, Stark Preservation Planning LLC (Stark) conducted a cultural resources analysis of effects study for the proposed Hiawatha Project (Project), which entails the construction of two new 115- kilovolt (kV) transmission lines and two new substations in south Minneapolis, Hennepin County, Minnesota by Northern States Power, a Minnesota corporation (Xcel Energy). Xcel Energy has submitted an application for a Route Permit to the Minnesota Public Utilities Commission (PUC) for the PUC to determine the Project’s impact on the environment, including archaeological and historic resources, and any alternatives that would increase or decrease these impacts. Xcel Energy has contracted Natural Resource Group, LLC (NRG) to assist with the permitting process.
    [Show full text]
  • South High Students Walk out to Support All Nations Program
    Old-fashioned One sort Roosevelt and market proposed recycling gives Wellstone: Two for Lake Street Mpls. a boost schools in one Page 2 Page 3 Page 7 Longfellow Nokomis Your community Messeng newspaper since 1982 April 2013 • Vol. 29 No. 2 www.LongfellowNokomisMessenger.com 21,000 Circulation assembly held prior to the walk- keys. However, after local Native Minneapolis Youth out. American activists insisted students Movement formed by “All recognized the need for had the right to get their things, South High students diversity and gave a powerful mes- administrators agreed to allow stu- students to bring about sage about learning and recogniz- dents back in one at a time with ing each other.” Bellanger. “I was supervision, according to W. changes in their school really impressed with them.” Vizenor. district walk out to support “If this is an example of the Students were also warned be- young people coming up, I’m very fore they left the building that their By TESHA M. CHRISTENSEN happy.” departure would constitute an un- What began as a protest by All Nations program excused absence and that they Native American students grew FROM ASSEMBLY would not be allowed back with- into a walkout that united all eth- out a parent. They were welcome nic groups at South High School TO WALK-OUT back the next day. on Monday, March 11. W. Vizenor had initially planned to Organizers estimate that 500- organize a walkout, but then WHAT’S NEXT? 1,000 students peacefully walked agreed to work with school staff to Following the walkout, 50 students out of the school in a show of soli- hold an assembly inside instead.
    [Show full text]
  • Midtown Greenway Coalition, Bike Alliance of MN Is Our Fiscal Sponsor
    BuildingBuilding GreenwaysGreenways toto connectconnect neighborhoods,neighborhoods, parks,parks, schoolsschools andand downtownsdowntowns Who we are • Non-profit Board of Directors • Some overlap with Midtown Greenway Coalition, Bike Alliance of MN is our Fiscal Sponsor. Thanks to the following organizations for advice: • Midtown Greenway Coalition • Minneapolis – Planning & Public Works Staff • National Park Service • Minneapolis Park Board • Hennepin County • MNDot Twin Cities Greenways Twin Cities Greenways Twin Cities Greenways Vision Combine the best features of the Midtown Greenway and Milwaukee Avenue to create A new Network of Greenways Twin Cities Greenways Twin Cities Greenways The Midtown Greenway • Linear Park built in railroad trench just north of Lake Street • 5 miles of continuous trail across Minneapolis • One of the region’s most popular parks • One of the nation’s most used trails • Approximately 3,600 bikers use the route daily • Hundreds use the greenway for walking, jogging, and rollerblading TheThe MidtownMidtown GreenwayGreenway isis aa strongstrong modelmodel thatthat wewe wouldwould likelike toto replicatereplicate butbut isis uniqueunique duedue toto itsits dedicateddedicated rightright ofof wayway Twin Cities Greenways Twin Cities Greenways Expansion Challenges • We have few options for expanding the Greenway system if we limit ourselves to rail corridors. • An expansion of the Greenway system necessitates using other right-of-ways WeWe cancan looklook toto existingexisting mmodelsodels herehere inin thethe
    [Show full text]
  • Minneapolis-Bike-Trails.Pdf
    Sh MINNEAPOLIS in g 100 le C 47 BIKE TRAILSW r 94 e BROOKLYN O 49th Ave N COLUMBIA SE Ave 4th e s s k CENTER e Humboldt Ave N HEIGHTS o T 40th Ave NE R r d N Ave Bryant Jefferson St NE St Jefferson Paved Bike88 Trails Stinson Blvd 45th Ave N NE Central Ave Cleveland Ave N Ave Cleveland Main St NE St Main 37th Ave NE Co Rd D r W East River Rd D e Broadway Ave k We bb La er 65 ©2016 Hedberg Maps, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Pkw 42nd Ave N y NE Rd Lake Silver Licensed to Meet Minneapolis for use on minneapolis.org through June 2018. This map may not be posted on other websites without St Anthony Pkwy written permission of Hedberg Maps. Individuals may print a single copy for personal Grand Rounds use. Other reproduction is prohibited without St An Stinson Blvd additional license from Hedberg Maps. 38th Ave N Mississippi RIver th ROBBINSDALE on y hedbergmaps.com 94 Marshall St NE B l Victory Memorial Pkwy Memorial Victory v 29th Ave NE d Co Rd C Grand Rounds 2nd St N 0 1 Mile W Lyndale Ave N Ave Lyndale Penn Ave N Ave Penn ROSEVILLE Fremont Ave N Ave Fremont Co Rd B2 Central Ave NE Central Ave Terminal Rd Lowry Ave N Lowry Ave NE B r o a 36 d 65 w Johnson St NE a NE Ave University y New Brighton Blvd A 26th Ave N 18th Ave NE v e Minneapolis W W Diagonal Tr 280 100 N N Emerson Ave MINNEAPOLIS Vall y den ey R ol d w Broadway Ave W G k Golden Valley Rd 47 Broadway St NE Roselawn Ave W P 2nd St N h t r GOLDEN i W University Ave SE LAUDERDALE e VALLEY r 8th Ave NE NE Blvd Industrial o Ave N Stinson Blvd Larpenteur Ave W d Plymouth 3rd Ave NE Hennepin Ave E heo T d v 94 8th St SE Penn Ave N Penn Ave g Tr l Re B Luce Line Como Ave SE e t 7th St N i 4th St SE Co Olson Memorial Hwy Olson Memorial Hwy h Central Ave m W o K 55 55 n a A s v Va o e G Target Field t Ba Dinkytown a s N Cleveland Ave r s Washington Ave S A a e Greenway v n t e 280 d t Cedar Lake Tr S Cre Target W E Glenwood Ave e R k Center TCF Bank Intercampus Stadium o T Transitway r 394 u University Ave SE Energy Park Dr n U of MN 3rd Ave S East Bank d U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • METRO GREENPRINT Planning for Nature in the Face of Urban Growth
    METRO GREENPRINT Planning for nature in the face of urban growth Greenways and Natural Areas December 1997 Collaborative Table of contents Executive summary. 7 The need for greenspaces. 11 Vision for the future. 13 Building blocks. 17 Putting the pieces together. 22 Long-term dividends. 23 Goals and strategies. 25 Next steps and recommendations. 30 Appendix A: Glossary of terms. 32 Appendix B: County natural resources maps. 33 Appendix C: Local greenways and natural areas initiatives. 41 Appendix D: Toolbox for land protection. 44 Bibliography. 47 For more information, contact: Equal opportunity to participate in and benefit Metro Region MN-DNR from programs of the Minnesota Department of 1200 Warner Road Natural Resources is available to all individuals St. Paul, MN 55106 regardless of race, color, creed, religion, national Metro Area: 612-772-7900 origin, sex, marital status, status with regard to Toll free: 1-888-MINNDNR public assistance, age, sexual orientation, or disability. Discrimination inquiries should be TTY & TDD: 612-296-5484, sent to MN-DNR, 500 Lafayette Road, St. Paul, TDD Toll free: 1-800-657-3929 MN 55155-4031 or the Equal Opportunity © Copyright 1997, State of Minnesota, Office, Department of the Interior, Washing- Department of Natural Resources. ton, DC 20240. Funding for this project approved by the Printed on recycled paper containing a Minnesota Legislature, ML 1996, Chapter 407, minimum of 10 percent post-consumer waste Sec. 8, Subd. 4, as recommended by the and soy-based ink. Legislative Commission on Minnesota Cover painting by George Pfeifer, cover photos Resources from the Minnesota Futures by Carrol Henderson and Lawrence Duke.
    [Show full text]
  • The Midtown Greenway
    Midtown Greenway trail access Ramsey Hennepin Welcome to the Midtown Greenway MPLS Saint Paul The Midtown Greenway is a 6 mile multi-use trail in a historic railroad trench linking parks, trails, businesses, and cultural destinations between the Midtown Greenway Mississippi River and the Chain of Lakes. The trail runs parallel to nearby Lake Street, a home to arts and cultural organizations, major institutions, and a diverse community of small local businesses. S S S S R d Minneapolis a Summit Ave e i o 1 v e e ilr e LORING PARK Riverside Park e e Ra Cedar 18th St E v Murphy 8th St S PROSPEC T PARK - v r v F v 7 s S v 94 Jewish Day N A 65 id B A t A A 55 Augsburg e Kenwood A h 94 Square r n P A EAST RIVER ROAD S s West River School Lake x Butler Pl v e x Lincoln Ave Lincoln Ave Stevens College e o A e e 94 e S v a t o S A v f Square Trinity First n v i l Parkway E e n Park n l E m To n S 19th St E e n i e 19th St E S v Park a o l a Lutheran S K O v d e S Downtown t i J C A Franklin Pedestrian E A C r STEVEN'S SQUARE - t v F A ra S e S n Mississippi v k Bridge S l Minneapolis g in Franklin Avenue A h Kenwood t R A k BRYN - l t S e ve LOWRY HILL n National River i i n LORING HEIGHTS W v c i Station S n Library i c S Elementary VENTURA Franklin Ave E e o and Recreation K S o r w e d MAWR 5 w p T s E e School r r C e Area (MNRRA) S e r 5 S u Hennepin S VILLAGE o n r S a e v e S E f e e M D w Peavey v LAKE FOREST e 21st S S A t E Elementary e e S d v Takoda W v M m v S v A S S v t Cedar Lake o e e e A A E e A 21st St W e i Charter S Forest
    [Show full text]
  • National Register of Historic Places Registration Form
    NPS Form 10-900 0MB No. 1024-0018 (Oct. 1990) United States Department of the Interior National Park Service 0 National Register of Historic Places Registration Form This form is for use in nominating or requesting determinations for individual properties and districts. See instructions in How to Complete the National Register of Historic Places Registration Form (National Register Bulletin 16A). Complete each item by marking "x" in the appropriate box or by entering the information requested. If any item does not apply to the property being documented, snter "N/A" Tor not applicable." For functions, architectural classification, materials, and areas of significance, enter only categories and subcategories frorrTthe instructions. Place additional entries and narrative items on continuation "sheets (NPS Form l6-900a). Use a typewriter, word processor, or computer, to complete all items. 1. Name of Property____________________________________________________ historic name Chicago Milwaukee and St. Paul Railroad Grade Separation other names/site number Midtown Greenway 2. Location__________________________________________________________ street & number Corridor parallel to 29th St. between Humboldt Ave. S. and 20th Ave. S. I—I not for publication N/A city or town Minneapolis—————————————————————————————————— L] vicinity state Minnesota_____ code MtJ___ county Hennepin___ code 053___ zip code 55408, 55407 3. State/Federal Agency Certification____________________________________________________________ As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act of 1986, as amended, I hereby certify that this Kl nomination E request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Places and meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60. In my opinion, the property K! meets D does not meet the National Register Criteria.
    [Show full text]
  • Technical Report #166: I-35W Bridge Collapse and Response
    U.S. Fire Administration/Technical Report Series I-35W Bridge Collapse and Response Minneapolis, Minnesota USFA-TR-166/August 2007 U.S. Fire Administration Fire Investigations Program he U.S. Fire Administration (USFA) develops reports on selected major fires throughout the country. The fires usually involve multiple deaths or a large loss of property, but the primary T criterion for deciding to write a report is whether it will result in significant “lessons learned.” In some cases these lessons bring to light new knowledge about fire—the effect of building con- struction or contents, human behavior in fire, etc. In other cases, the lessons are not new, but are serious enough to highlight once again because of another fire tragedy. In some cases, special reports are developed to discuss events, drills, or new technologies or tactics that are of interest to the fire service. The reports are sent to fire magazines and are distributed at national and regional fire meetings. The reports are available on request from USFA. Announcements of their availability are published widely in fire journals and newsletters. This body of work provides detailed information on the nature of the fire problem for policymakers who must decide on allocations of resources between fire and other pressing problems, and within the fire service to improve codes and code enforcement, training, public fire education, building technology, and other related areas. The USFA, which has no regulatory authority, sends an experienced fire investigator into a commu- nity after a major incident only after having conferred with the local fire authorities to ensure that USFA’s assistance and presence would be supportive and would in no way interfere with any review of the incident they are themselves conducting.
    [Show full text]
  • Hwy 65/Third Avenue Bridge Virtual Historian-Led Tour Transcript
    Virtual Historian-Led Tour Transcript (September 2020) A slide fills the screen. The top half features a photo of the Third Avenue Bridge in Minneapolis. A blue box with white text is in the middle of the photo. In the upper right corner is a video where Christina Nesse speaks to the camera. A blue banner with text divides the slide in half. Below it, on a white background, are the Minnesota Department of Transportation logo, the date of the presentation, and the presenters' information. ON SCREEN TEXT: Welcome! The presentation will begin shortly. Please call 612.759.2110 if you are having issues hearing any audio or seeing the screen. THE HISTORIC THIRD AVENUE BRIDGE Katie Haun Schuring | Cultural Resources Historian Chris Hoberg | Project Manager 9/29/2020 CHRISTINA: All right, good evening, everyone. Welcome. For those of you who just joined us in the last couple of minutes, my name is Kristina Nesse. I, like I mentioned a few minutes ago, am on the consultant team supporting the Minnesota Department of Transportation on this amazing Historic Third Avenue Bridge project, and we are so excited to share a wealth of historic knowledge and resources and a tour of sorts, a virtual tour of the bridge through Zoom tonight and are so happy that you are here. So I will be here in the background throughout the duration of the presentation and monitoring our chat and making sure that if you have questions about the history of the project or otherwise, that we are able to answer those. We'll be addressing most of the questions at the end, but I do also encourage you to share in the chat..
    [Show full text]