Midtown Corridor Historic Bridge Study

Midtown Corridor Historic Bridge Study

Midtown Corridor Historic Bridge Study Prepared for: Public Works Department City of Minneapolis, Minnesota ___ __, 2007 Prepared by: Project No. 13200.000 SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA _____ __, 2007 Midtown Corridor Historic Bridge Study Final Report Public Works Department City of Minneapolis, Minnesota CERTIFICATIONS I hereby certify that this report, except those sections specifically listed elsewhere in these certifications, was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. James J. Bellefeuille, P.E. / / Lic. No. 20662 I hereby certify that the sections of this report identified as having been prepared by me were prepared under my direct supervision and that I meet the Secretary of the Interior's Professional Qualifications Standards for Historian and Architectural Historian Charlene Roise / / Midtown Corridor Historic Bridge Study Final Report Midtown Corridor Historic Bridge Study Final Report Public Works Department City of Minneapolis, Minnesota TABLE OF CONTENTS I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY.................................................................................................1 A. Purpose of and Contributors to the Study................................................................1 B. The Historic District ................................................................................................1 C. Structural Evaluation ...............................................................................................2 D. Current Repair Practices and Feasible New Technologies......................................2 E. Recommendations for Each Bridge, Timeline, and Cost Estimate..........................2 F. Bridge Removal and Impact on the Historic District...............................................3 G. Conclusions..............................................................................................................4 H. Subsequent Steps.....................................................................................................5 II. INTRODUCTION ...............................................................................................................6 A. Project Overview.....................................................................................................6 1. Purpose of the Study ................................................................................... 6 2. Definitions of the Midtown Corridor, Midtown Greenway, and the Historic District........................................................................................... 6 3. Contributors to This Study.......................................................................... 7 B. Bridges Included in the Study..................................................................................8 C. Selection of Bridges for the Study...........................................................................8 D. Research Methods....................................................................................................9 1. Structural Evaluation .................................................................................. 9 2. Historic Study............................................................................................. 9 E. Subsequent Steps.....................................................................................................9 III. CHICAGO MILWAUKEE AND ST. PAUL RAILROAD GRADE SEPARATION HISTORIC DISTRICT ........................................................................................................9 A. Defining Characteristics of the Historic District .....................................................9 B. Origin of the Grade Separation..............................................................................10 C. Original Construction Methods and Materials.......................................................19 Midtown Corridor Historic Bridge Study i Final Report IV. POTENTIAL TRANSIT WITHIN THE RAIL CORRIDOR ...........................................23 A. Light Rail Transit...................................................................................................26 1. Alignment Needs...................................................................................... 26 2. Double Track............................................................................................ 26 3. Platform Arrangements............................................................................. 29 4. Pedestrian Circulation and Access............................................................ 29 5. Impacts to the Greenway Trail.................................................................. 29 B. Modern StreetCar...................................................................................................30 C. Busway...................................................................................................................30 D. Potential Transit—Conclusions.............................................................................30 V. STRUCTURAL EVALUATION......................................................................................30 A. Overview................................................................................................................30 1. Goals ......................................................................................................... 30 2. Methodology of Analysis.......................................................................... 31 3. Available Information............................................................................... 31 B. Description of Bridge Types and Criteria Thresholds ...........................................31 C. Bridge Type Summary...........................................................................................32 1. Cast-in-Place Concrete T-Beams (Structure Type 1) ............................... 32 2. Continuous Concrete Slab Span (Structure Type 2)................................. 32 3. Steel Beam (Structure Type 3).................................................................. 32 4. Post Tensioned Continuous Concrete Slab Span (Structure Type 4) ....... 33 5. Culvert (Structure Type 5)........................................................................ 33 6. Prestressed Concrete Beam and Slab Span (Structure Type 6) ................ 33 7. Concrete Frames (Structure Type 7)......................................................... 33 D. Structural Analysis of Five Representative Bridges ..............................................34 1. Evaluation Process.................................................................................... 34 a. Bridge L8901, Fremont Avenue South..........................................36 b. Bridge L89081, Pleasant Avenue ..................................................44 c. Bridge L8913, Columbus Avenue .................................................50 d. Bridge L8915, 10th Avenue South ................................................56 e. Bridge L8923, 18th Avenue South ................................................61 2. Conclusions............................................................................................... 66 Midtown Corridor Historic Bridge Study ii Final Report VI. CURRENT REPAIR PRACTICES AND NEW TECHNOLOGIES................................66 A. Current Practices....................................................................................................66 1. Shotcrete ................................................................................................... 66 2. Deck Area Patching (Partial- and Full-Depth).......................................... 67 3. Epoxy Injection of Cracks ........................................................................ 67 4. Low Viscosity Sealants and Silane Surface Sealers ................................. 68 5. Deck Drainage Improvements .................................................................. 69 6. Membrane With Asphalt Overlay............................................................. 69 7. Mill and Overlay of Road Surface............................................................ 70 8. High Performance Concrete...................................................................... 70 B. New Technologies.................................................................................................71 1. Reinforcing Bars....................................................................................... 71 a. Steel Bars With Metallic Coating and Alternative Solid Metal Bars ............................................................................71 b. Prefabricated Fusion Bonded Epoxy Coated Reinforcing Bars ............................................................................72 2. Cathodic Protection................................................................................... 72 3. Electrochemical Extraction (ECE)............................................................ 73 4. Strengthening Using Carbon Fiber Reinforced Polymer (CFRP)............. 73 C. CASE STUDIES....................................................................................................74 1. Bridge L8901 - Fremont Avenue.............................................................. 74 2. Bridge L8915 - 10th Avenue .................................................................... 75 3. Bridge L8923 - 18th Avenue .................................................................... 76 VII. RECOMMENDATIONS FOR EACH BRIDGE, TIMELINE,

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    130 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us