DOCSLIB.ORG

Kenai National Wildlife Refuge's Species List

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Kenai National Wildlife Refuge's Species List Kenai National Wildlife Refuge Species List, version 2017-06-30 Kenai National Wildlife Refuge biology staff June 30, 2017 2 Cover images represent changes to the checklist. Top left: Halobi- sium occidentale observed at Gull Rock, June 8, 2017 (https://www. inaturalist.org/observations/6565787). Image CC BY Matt Bowser. Top right: Aegialites alaskaensis observed at Gull Rock, June 8, 2017 (http://www.inaturalist.org/observations/6612922). Image CC BY Matt Bowser. Bottom left: Fucus distichus observed at Gull Rock, June 8, 2017 (https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/6612338). Image CC BY Matt Bowser. Bottom right: Littorina subrotundata observed at Gull Rock, June 8, 2017 (http://www.inaturalist.org/observations/6612398). Image CC BY Matt Bowser. Contents Contents 3 Introduction 5 Purpose............................................................ 5 About the list......................................................... 5 Acknowledgments....................................................... 5 Native species 7 Vertebrates .......................................................... 7 Invertebrates ......................................................... 24 Vascular Plants........................................................ 47 Bryophytes .......................................................... 59 Chromista........................................................... 63 Fungi ............................................................. 63 Protozoa............................................................ 72 Non-native species 73 Vertebrates .......................................................... 73 Invertebrates ......................................................... 73 Vascular Plants........................................................ 74 Extirpated species 77 Vertebrates .......................................................... 77 Vascular Plants........................................................ 77 Images 79 Change log 83 References 85 Index 87 3 Introduction Purpose to avoid implying that any of the provisional names we use are formally accepted by formatting them as proper scien- A primary purpose for which the Kenai National Wildlife tific names. Also, note that our database enforces lower case Refuge was established in the Alaska National Interest letters in our specific epithets so that, for example, \Rab- Lands Conservation Act of 1980 was, \to conserve fish and dophaga sp. BOLD:ADA6450" becomes \Rabdophaga sp. wildlife populations and habitats in their natural diver- bold:ada6450." sity. ," where the term “fish and wildlife" was defined Synonymies we included do not necessarily reflect our as \any member of the animal kingdom, including without opinions and are not intended as statements on correct tax- limitation any mammal, fish, bird. , amphibian, reptile, onomy (we generally follow ITIS); rather, synonymns are mollusk, crustacean, arthropod or other invertebrate." An included in the index as an aid to the reader to help find obvious first step toward fulfilling this purpose is to know taxa for which names may have changed. what fish and wildlife, habitats, and natural diversity are to In the checklist non-native species are indicated with a be conserved. This checklist is intended to be a frequently- dagger symbol (y) and species represented by both native updated document reflecting our current knowledge of which and non-native populations are indicated with a double dag- living things call the Kenai National Wildlife Refuge home. ger symbol (z). This list is dynamic and far from perfect with many changes and corrections yet to be made. Please About the list send comments and corrections to Matt Bowser at matt [email protected]. The present list includes a total of 2,101 species. Of these, 2,007 are considered to be native, 89 species are consid- ered to be non-native, and five species are represented Acknowledgments by both native and non-native populations. Eighteen non- native species are believed to have been extirpated from the Thanks and credit are due to many people who have re- Refuge. viewed this list, provided identifications, and helped in other Since the last version of this list (Kenai National Wildlife ways. The list below is by no means exhaustive. Refuge biology staff, 2017) where 2,075 species were listed, there has been a net increase of 26 species added. See the James Bergdahl (Conservation Biology Center, Spokane, change log (page 83) for details. Washington) reviewed and made helpful comments on The list was produced from an in-house database using the Refuge's list of Carabidae. ITIS (http://www.itis.gov) for its taxonomic backbone. Ac- cordingly, names and hierarchies generally follow ITIS ex- Peter Hovingh provided a list of leeches (Hirudinea) col- cept where taxa are not represented in ITIS. lected on the Refuge. Although accepted scientific names are used wherever these are known, we have included provisional identifications John Hudson (USFWS, Juneau, Alaska) provided lists of (for example, \Typhula sp.") where these represent the best Odonata observed on the Refuge. information available. Species recognized only as molecu- Richard Payne (University of York, Heslington, UK) pro- lar operational taxonomic units are also included, mainly vided a list of protists from Jigsaw Lake from Payne entities recognized by Barcode Index Numbers (BINs, Rat- et al.(2006). nasingham and Hebert, 2013). We have chosen not to fol- low the usual convention of italicizing genus and species David Wartinbee (retired from Kenai Peninsula College, names because our current system does not enable us to Soldotna, Alaska) shared a list of Chironomidae he had handle accepted and provisional names separately. We want collected on the Refuge. 5 Native species occurring on the Kenai National Wildlife Refuge Vertebrates Common names: Steelhead Literature records: Kyle(1992): iNaturalist observations: Phylum Chordata 811982, 1814201 Class Actinopterygii Oncorhynchus nerka Order Cypriniformes Common names: Sockeye salmon or kokanee Literature records: Kyle(1992) iNaturalist observations: Family Catostomidae 1021584 Catostomus catostomus Oncorhynchus tshawytscha Common names: Longnose sucker Common names: Chinook salmon or king salmon Image(s):1 Prosopium cylindraceum Taxonomic notes: Two forms have been documented from the Refuge: the typical form and a semi-dwarf form known from Wolf Common names: Round whitefish and Finger Lakes (Dean and Rickabough, 2005). Literature records: Kyle(1992) Distribution and trends: Widespread across Alaska, northern Salvelinus alpinus North America, and into Arctic Siberia (Page and Burr, 1991), this Common names: Arctic char species is present in the Kenai River and Swanson River watersheds on the Refuge (Dean and Rickabough, 2005). Salvelinus malma Biology: Catostomus catostomus is a bottom-feeder, consuming Common names: Dolly varden mainly invertebrates (Mansfield, 2004). Literature records: Kyle(1992) iNaturalist observations: : Dean and Rickabough(2005), Friedersdorff Literature records 811997 (1986), Friedersdorff and Jakubas(1984a), Friedersdorff and Jakubas (1984b) Salvelinus namaycush Common names: Lake trout Order Gasterosteiformes Literature records: Kyle(1992) Family Gasterosteidae Order Scorpaeniformes Gasterosteus aculeatus Common names: Threespine stickleback Family Cottidae Image(s):2 Cottus aleuticus Literature records: Friedersdorff and Jakubas(1984a), Kyle (1992), Sprehn et al.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Fauna Lepidopterologica Volgo-Uralensis" 150 Years Later: Changes and Additions
    ©Ges. zur Förderung d. Erforschung von Insektenwanderungen e.V. München, download unter www.zobodat.at Atalanta (August 2000) 31 (1/2):327-367< Würzburg, ISSN 0171-0079 "Fauna lepidopterologica Volgo-Uralensis" 150 years later: changes and additions. Part 5. Noctuidae (Insecto, Lepidoptera) by Vasily V. A n ik in , Sergey A. Sachkov , Va d im V. Z o lo t u h in & A n drey V. Sv ir id o v received 24.II.2000 Summary: 630 species of the Noctuidae are listed for the modern Volgo-Ural fauna. 2 species [Mesapamea hedeni Graeser and Amphidrina amurensis Staudinger ) are noted from Europe for the first time and one more— Nycteola siculana Fuchs —from Russia. 3 species ( Catocala optata Godart , Helicoverpa obsoleta Fabricius , Pseudohadena minuta Pungeler ) are deleted from the list. Supposedly they were either erroneously determinated or incorrect noted from the region under consideration since Eversmann 's work. 289 species are recorded from the re­ gion in addition to Eversmann 's list. This paper is the fifth in a series of publications1 dealing with the composition of the pres­ ent-day fauna of noctuid-moths in the Middle Volga and the south-western Cisurals. This re­ gion comprises the administrative divisions of the Astrakhan, Volgograd, Saratov, Samara, Uljanovsk, Orenburg, Uralsk and Atyraus (= Gurjev) Districts, together with Tataria and Bash­ kiria. As was accepted in the first part of this series, only material reliably labelled, and cover­ ing the last 20 years was used for this study. The main collections are those of the authors: V. A n i k i n (Saratov and Volgograd Districts), S.
    [Show full text]
  • Dragonflies (Odonata) of the Northwest Territories Status Ranking And
    DRAGONFLIES (ODONATA) OF THE NORTHWEST TERRITORIES STATUS RANKING AND PRELIMINARY ATLAS PAUL M. CATLING University of Ottawa 2003 TABLE OF CONTENTS Abstract ....................................................................3 Acknowledgements ...........................................................3 Methods ....................................................................3 The database .................................................................4 History .....................................................................5 Rejected taxa ................................................................5 Possible additions ............................................................5 Additional field inventory ......................................................7 Collection an Inventory of dragonflies .............................................8 Literature Cited .............................................................10 Appendix Table 1 - checklist ...................................................13 Appendix Table 2 - Atlas and ranking notes .......................................15 2 ABSTRACT: occurrences was provided by Dr. Rex Thirty-five species of Odonata are given Kenner, Dr. Donna Giberson, Dr. Nick status ranks in the Northwest Territories Donnelly and Dr. Robert Cannings (some based on number of occurrences and details provided below). General distributional area within the territory. Nine information on contacts and locations of species are ranked as S2, may be at risk, collections provided by Dr. Cannings
    [Show full text]
  • Keys to Families of Beetles in America North of Mexico
    816 · Key to Families Keys to Families of Beetles in America North of Mexico by Michael A. Ivie hese keys are specifically designed for North American and, where possible, overly long lists of options, but when nec- taxa and may lead to incorrect identifications of many essary, I have erred on the side of directing the user to a correct Ttaxa from outside this region. They are aimed at the suc- identification. cessful family placement of all beetles in North America north of No key will work on all specimens because of abnormalities Mexico, and as such will not always be simple to use. A key to the of development, poor preservation, previously unknown spe- most common 50% of species in North America would be short cies, sexes or variation, or simple errors in characterization. Fur- and simple to use. However, after an initial learning period, most thermore, with more than 30,000 species to be considered, there coleopterists recognize those groups on sight, and never again are undoubtedly rare forms that escaped my notice and even key them out. It is the odd, the rare and the exceptional that make possibly some common and easily collected species with excep- a complex key necessary, and it is in its ability to correctly place tional characters that I overlooked. While this key should work those taxa that a key is eventually judged. Although these keys for at least 95% of specimens collected and 90% of North Ameri- build on many previous successful efforts, especially those of can species, the specialized collector who delves into unique habi- Crowson (1955), Arnett (1973) and Borror et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Identification Key for Mosquito Species
    ‘Reverse’ identification key for mosquito species More and more people are getting involved in the surveillance of invasive mosquito species Species name used Synonyms Common name in the EU/EEA, not just professionals with formal training in entomology. There are many in the key taxonomic keys available for identifying mosquitoes of medical and veterinary importance, but they are almost all designed for professionally trained entomologists. Aedes aegypti Stegomyia aegypti Yellow fever mosquito The current identification key aims to provide non-specialists with a simple mosquito recog- Aedes albopictus Stegomyia albopicta Tiger mosquito nition tool for distinguishing between invasive mosquito species and native ones. On the Hulecoeteomyia japonica Asian bush or rock pool Aedes japonicus japonicus ‘female’ illustration page (p. 4) you can select the species that best resembles the specimen. On japonica mosquito the species-specific pages you will find additional information on those species that can easily be confused with that selected, so you can check these additional pages as well. Aedes koreicus Hulecoeteomyia koreica American Eastern tree hole Aedes triseriatus Ochlerotatus triseriatus This key provides the non-specialist with reference material to help recognise an invasive mosquito mosquito species and gives details on the morphology (in the species-specific pages) to help with verification and the compiling of a final list of candidates. The key displays six invasive Aedes atropalpus Georgecraigius atropalpus American rock pool mosquito mosquito species that are present in the EU/EEA or have been intercepted in the past. It also contains nine native species. The native species have been selected based on their morpho- Aedes cretinus Stegomyia cretina logical similarity with the invasive species, the likelihood of encountering them, whether they Aedes geniculatus Dahliana geniculata bite humans and how common they are.
    [Show full text]
  • Dytiscid Water Beetles (Coleoptera: Dytiscidae) of the Yukon
    Dytiscid water beetles of the Yukon FRONTISPIECE. Neoscutopterus horni (Crotch), a large, black species of dytiscid beetle that is common in sphagnum bog pools throughout the Yukon Territory. 491 Dytiscid Water Beetles (Coleoptera: Dytiscidae) of the Yukon DAVID J. LARSON Department of Biology, Memorial University of Newfoundland St. John’s, Newfoundland, Canada A1B 3X9 Abstract. One hundred and thirteen species of Dytiscidae (Coleoptera) are recorded from the Yukon Territory. The Yukon distribution, total geographical range and habitat of each of these species is described and multi-species patterns are summarized in tabular form. Several different range patterns are recognized with most species being Holarctic or transcontinental Nearctic boreal (73%) in lentic habitats. Other major range patterns are Arctic (20 species) and Cordilleran (12 species), while a few species are considered to have Grassland (7), Deciduous forest (2) or Southern (5) distributions. Sixteen species have a Beringian and glaciated western Nearctic distribution, i.e. the only Nearctic Wisconsinan refugial area encompassed by their present range is the Alaskan/Central Yukon refugium; 5 of these species are closely confined to this area while 11 have wide ranges that extend in the arctic and/or boreal zones east to Hudson Bay. Résumé. Les dytiques (Coleoptera: Dytiscidae) du Yukon. Cent treize espèces de dytiques (Coleoptera: Dytiscidae) sont connues au Yukon. Leur répartition au Yukon, leur répartition globale et leur habitat sont décrits et un tableau résume les regroupements d’espèces. La répartition permet de reconnaître plusieurs éléments: la majorité des espèces sont holarctiques ou transcontinentales-néarctiques-boréales (73%) dans des habitats lénitiques. Vingt espèces sont arctiques, 12 sont cordillériennes, alors qu’un petit nombre sont de la prairie herbeuse (7), ou de la forêt décidue (2), ou sont australes (5).
    [Show full text]
  • A Review of the Systematics of Hawaiian Planthoppers (Hemiptera: Fulgoroidea)L
    Pacific Science (1997), vol. 51, no. 4: 366-376 © 1997 by University of Hawai'i Press. All rights reserved A Review of the Systematics of Hawaiian Planthoppers (Hemiptera: Fulgoroidea)l MANFRED ASCHE2 ABSTRACT: With 206 endemic species, the phytophagous Fulgoroidea, or planthop­ pers, are among the most important elements of the native Hawaiian fauna. These principally monophagous or oligophagous insects occur in nearly all Hawaiian terrestrial ecosystems. Species of two of the 18 planthopper families occurring worldwide have successfully colonized and subsequently radiated in Hawai'i. Based on collections made mainly by Perkins, Kirkaldy, Muir, Giffard, and Swezey, more than 95% of these species were described in the first three decades of this century. The systematics of the Hawaiian planthoppers has changed little in the past 60 yr and is not based on any phylogenetic analyses. This paper attempts a preliminary phylogenetic evaluation ofthe native Hawaiian p1anthoppers on the basis ofcompara­ tive morphology to recognize monophyletic taxa and major evolutionary lines. The following taxa are each descendants of single colonizing species: in Cixiidae, the Hawaiian Oliarus and Iolania species; in De1phacidae, Aloha partim, Dictyophoro­ delphax, Emoloana, Leialoha + Nesothoe, Nesodryas, and at least four groups within Nesosydne. Polyphyletic taxa are the tribe "Alohini," Aloha s.l., Nesorestias, Nesosydne s.l., and Nothorestias. Non-Hawaiian species currently placed in Iolania, Oliarus, Aloha, Leialoha, and Nesosydne are not closely allied to the Hawaiian taxa. The origin of the Hawaiian planthoppers is obscure. The Hawaiian Oliorus appear to have affinities to (North) American taxa. ALTHOUGH THE HAWAIIAN ISLANDS are the most Other groups of Hawaiian insects have isolated islands on earth, they house a remark­ received far less attention, although they are ably rich flora and fauna.
    [Show full text]
  • The Mosquitoes of Alaska
    LIBRAR Y ■JRD FEBE- Î961 THE U. s. DtPÁ¡<,,>^iMl OF AGidCÜLl-yí MOSQUITOES OF ALASKA Agriculture Handbook No. 182 Agricultural Research Service UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE U < The purpose of this handbook is to present information on the biology, distribu- tion, identification, and control of the species of mosquitoes known to occur in Alaska. Much of this information has been published in short papers in various journals and is not readily available to those who need a comprehensive treatise on this subject ; some of the material has not been published before. The information l)r()UKlit together here will serve as a guide for individuals and communities that have an interest and responsibility in mosquito problems in Alaska. In addition, the military services will have considerable use for this publication at their various installations in Alaska. CuUseta alaskaensis, one of the large "snow mosquitoes" that overwinter as adults and emerge from hiber- nation while much of the winter snow is on the ground. In some localities this species is suJBBciently abundant to cause serious annoy- ance. THE MOSQUITOES OF ALASKA By C. M. GJULLIN, R. I. SAILER, ALAN STONE, and B. V. TRAVIS Agriculture Handbook No. 182 Agricultural Research Service UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE Washington, D.C. Issued January 1961 For «ale by the Superintendent of Document«. U.S. Government Printing Office Washington 25, D.C. - Price 45 cent» Contents Page Page History of mosquito abundance Biology—Continued and control 1 Oviposition 25 Mosquito literature 3 Hibernation 25 Economic losses 4 Surveys of the mosquito problem. 25 Mosquito-control organizations 5 Mosquito surveys 25 Life history 5 Engineering surveys 29 Eggs_".
    [Show full text]
  • Ecography ECOG-02578 Pinkert, S., Brandl, R
    Ecography ECOG-02578 Pinkert, S., Brandl, R. and Zeuss, D. 2016. Colour lightness of dragonfly assemblages across North America and Europe. – Ecography doi: 10.1111/ecog.02578 Supplementary material Appendix 1 Figures A1–A12, Table A1 and A2 1 Figure A1. Scatterplots between female and male colour lightness of 44 North American (Needham et al. 2000) and 19 European (Askew 1988) dragonfly species. Note that colour lightness of females and males is highly correlated. 2 Figure A2. Correlation of the average colour lightness of European dragonfly species illustrated in both Askew (1988) and Dijkstra and Lewington (2006). Average colour lightness ranges from 0 (absolute black) to 255 (pure white). Note that the extracted colour values of dorsal dragonfly drawings from both sources are highly correlated. 3 Figure A3. Frequency distribution of the average colour lightness of 152 North American and 74 European dragonfly species. Average colour lightness ranges from 0 (absolute black) to 255 (pure white). Rugs at the abscissa indicate the value of each species. Note that colour values are from different sources (North America: Needham et al. 2000, Europe: Askew 1988), and hence absolute values are not directly comparable. 4 Figure A4. Scatterplots of single ordinary least-squares regressions between average colour lightness of 8,127 North American dragonfly assemblages and mean temperature of the warmest quarter. Red dots represent assemblages that were excluded from the analysis because they contained less than five species. Note that those assemblages that were excluded scatter more than those with more than five species (c.f. the coefficients of determination) due to the inherent effect of very low sampling sizes.
    [Show full text]
  • Lepidoptera of a Raised Bog and Adjacent Forest in Lithuania
    Eur. J. Entomol. 101: 63–67, 2004 ISSN 1210-5759 Lepidoptera of a raised bog and adjacent forest in Lithuania DALIUS DAPKUS Department of Zoology, Vilnius Pedagogical University, Studentų 39, LT–2004 Vilnius, Lithuania; e-mail: [email protected] Key words. Lepidoptera, tyrphobiontic and tyrphophilous species, communities, raised bog, wet forest, Lithuania Abstract. Studies on nocturnal Lepidoptera were carried out on the Laukėnai raised bog and the adjacent wet forest in 2001. Species composition and abundance were evaluated and compared. The species richness was much higher in the forest than at the bog. The core of each lepidopteran community was composed of 22 species with an abundance of higher than 1.0% of the total catch. Tyrpho- philous Hypenodes humidalis (22.0% of all individuals) and Nola aerugula (13.0%) were the dominant species in the raised bog community, while tyrphoneutral Pelosia muscerda (13.6%) and Eilema griseola (8.3%) were the most abundant species at the forest site. Five tyrphobiotic and nine tyrphophilous species made up 43.4% of the total catch on the bog, and three and seven species, respectively, at the forest site, where they made up 9.2% of all individuals. 59% of lepidopteran species recorded on the bog and 36% at the forest site were represented by less than five individuals. The species compositions of these communities showed a weak similarity. Habitat preferences of the tyrphobiontic and tyrphophilous species and dispersal of some of the species between the habi- tats are discussed. INTRODUCTION (1996). Ecological terminology is that of Mikkola & Spitzer (1983), Spitzer & Jaroš (1993), Spitzer (1994): tyrphobiontic The insect fauna of isolated raised bogs in Europe is species are species that are strongly associated with peat bogs, unique in having a considerable portion of relict boreal while tyrphophilous taxa are more abundant on bogs than in and subarctic species (Mikkola & Spitzer, 1983; Spitzer adjacent habitats.
    [Show full text]
  • DE TTK 1949 Taxonomy and Systematics of the Eurasian
    DE TTK 1949 Taxonomy and systematics of the Eurasian Craniophora Snellen, 1867 species (Lepidoptera, Noctuidae, Acronictinae) Az eurázsiai Craniophora Snellen, 1867 fajok taxonómiája és szisztematikája (Lepidoptera, Noctuidae, Acronictinae) PhD thesis Egyetemi doktori (PhD) értekezés Kiss Ádám Témavezető: Prof. Dr. Varga Zoltán DEBRECENI EGYETEM Természettudományi Doktori Tanács Juhász-Nagy Pál Doktori Iskola Debrecen, 2017. Ezen értekezést a Debreceni Egyetem Természettudományi Doktori Tanács Juhász-Nagy Pál Doktori Iskola Biodiverzitás programja keretében készítettem a Debreceni Egyetem természettudományi doktori (PhD) fokozatának elnyerése céljából. Debrecen, 2017. ………………………… Kiss Ádám Tanúsítom, hogy Kiss Ádám doktorjelölt 2011 – 2014. között a fent megnevezett Doktori Iskola Biodiverzitás programjának keretében irányításommal végezte munkáját. Az értekezésben foglalt eredményekhez a jelölt önálló alkotó tevékenységével meghatározóan hozzájárult. Az értekezés elfogadását javasolom. Debrecen, 2017. ………………………… Prof. Dr. Varga Zoltán A doktori értekezés betétlapja Taxonomy and systematics of the Eurasian Craniophora Snellen, 1867 species (Lepidoptera, Noctuidae, Acronictinae) Értekezés a doktori (Ph.D.) fokozat megszerzése érdekében a biológiai tudományágban Írta: Kiss Ádám okleveles biológus Készült a Debreceni Egyetem Juhász-Nagy Pál doktori iskolája (Biodiverzitás programja) keretében Témavezető: Prof. Dr. Varga Zoltán A doktori szigorlati bizottság: elnök: Prof. Dr. Dévai György tagok: Prof. Dr. Bakonyi Gábor Dr. Rácz István András
    [Show full text]
  • 2010 Animal Species of Concern
    MONTANA NATURAL HERITAGE PROGRAM Animal Species of Concern Species List Last Updated 08/05/2010 219 Species of Concern 86 Potential Species of Concern All Records (no filtering) A program of the University of Montana and Natural Resource Information Systems, Montana State Library Introduction The Montana Natural Heritage Program (MTNHP) serves as the state's information source for animals, plants, and plant communities with a focus on species and communities that are rare, threatened, and/or have declining trends and as a result are at risk or potentially at risk of extirpation in Montana. This report on Montana Animal Species of Concern is produced jointly by the Montana Natural Heritage Program (MTNHP) and Montana Department of Fish, Wildlife, and Parks (MFWP). Montana Animal Species of Concern are native Montana animals that are considered to be "at risk" due to declining population trends, threats to their habitats, and/or restricted distribution. Also included in this report are Potential Animal Species of Concern -- animals for which current, often limited, information suggests potential vulnerability or for which additional data are needed before an accurate status assessment can be made. Over the last 200 years, 5 species with historic breeding ranges in Montana have been extirpated from the state; Woodland Caribou (Rangifer tarandus), Greater Prairie-Chicken (Tympanuchus cupido), Passenger Pigeon (Ectopistes migratorius), Pilose Crayfish (Pacifastacus gambelii), and Rocky Mountain Locust (Melanoplus spretus). Designation as a Montana Animal Species of Concern or Potential Animal Species of Concern is not a statutory or regulatory classification. Instead, these designations provide a basis for resource managers and decision-makers to make proactive decisions regarding species conservation and data collection priorities in order to avoid additional extirpations.
    [Show full text]
  • AKES Newsletter 2016
    Newsletter of the Alaska Entomological Society Volume 9, Issue 1, April 2016 In this issue: A history and update of the Kenelm W. Philip Col- lection, currently housed at the University of Alaska Museum ................... 23 Announcing the UAF Entomology Club ...... 1 The Blackberry Skeletonizer, Schreckensteinia fes- Bombus occidentalis in Alaska and the need for fu- taliella (Hübner) (Lepidoptera: Schreckensteini- ture study (Hymenoptera: Apidae) ........ 2 idae) in Alaska ................... 26 New findings of twisted-wing parasites (Strep- Northern spruce engraver monitoring in wind- siptera) in Alaska .................. 6 damaged forests in the Tanana River Valley of Asian gypsy moths and Alaska ........... 9 Interior Alaska ................... 28 Non-marine invertebrates of the St. Matthew Is- An overview of ongoing research: Arthropod lands, Bering Sea, Alaska ............. 11 abundance and diversity at Olive-sided Fly- Food review: Urocerus flavicornis (Fabricius) (Hy- catcher nest sites in interior Alaska ........ 29 menoptera: Siricidae) ............... 20 Glocianus punctiger (Sahlberg, 1835) (Coleoptera: The spruce aphid, a non-native species, is increas- Curculionidae) common in Soldotna ....... 32 ing in range and activity throughout coastal Review of the ninth annual meeting ........ 34 Alaska ........................ 21 Upcoming Events ................... 37 Announcing the UAF Entomology Club by Adam Haberski nights featuring classic “B-movie” horror films. Future plans include an entomophagy bake sale, summer collect- I am pleased to announce the formation of the Univer- ing trips, and sending representatives to the International sity of Alaska Fairbanks Entomology Club. The club was Congress of Entomology in Orlando Florida this Septem- conceived by students from the fall semester entomology ber. course to bring together undergraduate and graduate stu- The Entomology Club would like to collaborate with dents with an interest in entomology.
    [Show full text]