Staying in Control-Bridging the Gaps in Autonomous Vehicle Safety

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Staying in Control-Bridging the Gaps in Autonomous Vehicle Safety Staying in Control Bridging the Gaps in Autonomous Vehicle Safety A Research Synthesis by Transportation Resource Associates, Inc. August 2016 About the Authors Transportation Resource Associates (TRA), Inc., is a specialty, privately held consulting firm focused on public transportation and infrastructure safety and security projects throughout the United States. Public transportation providers, departments of transportation (DOTs), and related private-sector companies rely on TRA for pragmatic approaches to complex safety, security, operations, and maintenance issues. TRA’s 25-year history of experience provides a unique, valuable, and much-needed perspective as fully autonomous vehicles develop. TRA has extensive expertise in the creation, implementation, and assessment of safety and security programs for transportation providers as they grow and evolve. The company’s routine work entails the identification and resolution of hazards and unintended consequences from areas of system safety and security. Transit safety topics such as accident/incident investigation, hazard management, and safety certification inform TRA’s synthesis of the research toward evaluating a potential regulatory framework for autonomous vehicles, and ultimately a safer future for automobile travel. For more information, contact: James Young, Project Manager Phone: 215-546-9110 E-mail: [email protected] 1608 Walnut Street, Suite 1602 Philadelphia, PA 19103 Transportation Resource Associates, Inc. www.traonline.com Staying in Control: Bridging the Gaps in Autonomous Vehicle Safety Transportation Resource Associates | August 2016 2 Table of Contents About the Authors ....................................................................................................................... 2 Table of Contents ........................................................................................................................ 2 Executive Summary .................................................................................................................... 6 Challenges and Opportunities ................................................................................................. 6 Existing Conditions ................................................................................................................. 6 Models for Comparison .......................................................................................................... 7 Looking Ahead........................................................................................................................ 8 Acronyms .................................................................................................................................... 9 1 Existing Conditions ............................................................................................................... 10 1.1 Development and Deployment ....................................................................................... 10 1.1.1 Existing and Emerging Technology Adoption ........................................................... 10 1.1.2 Research and Development..................................................................................... 12 1.1.3 Forecasts for Deployment ....................................................................................... 14 1.1.4 Conclusion .............................................................................................................. 15 1.2 Infrastructure and Technology ....................................................................................... 16 1.2.1 Communications Technology ................................................................................. 16 1.2.2 Road Materials ........................................................................................................ 20 1.2.3 Road Design ............................................................................................................ 21 1.2.4 Other Key Infrastructure Issues .............................................................................. 22 1.2.5 Conclusion .............................................................................................................. 23 1.3 Accidents/Incidents and Known Hazards ...................................................................... 24 1.3.1 Conventional Vehicle Accident Trends .................................................................. 25 1.3.2 Accident and Incident Investigations and Current AV Data Tracking Methods .... 25 1.3.3 Data Limitations and Known Hazards to Safe AV Implementation....................... 27 1.3.4 Conclusion .............................................................................................................. 28 1.4 State and Federal Regulations ........................................................................................ 29 1.4.1 Testing and Licensing Requirements ...................................................................... 30 1.4.2 Driver Requirements ............................................................................................... 31 1.4.3 Limits on Liability .................................................................................................. 33 1.4.4 Limits on Operations............................................................................................... 33 1.4.5 Insurance Requirements .......................................................................................... 34 Staying in Control: Bridging the Gaps in Autonomous Vehicle Safety Transportation Resource Associates | August 2016 3 1.4.6 Vehicle Requirements ............................................................................................. 34 1.4.7 Conclusion .............................................................................................................. 36 1.5 Industry Standards .......................................................................................................... 38 1.5.1 Existing Industry Standards .................................................................................... 38 1.5.2 Developing New Industry Standards ...................................................................... 40 1.5.3 Conclusion .............................................................................................................. 41 2 Safety Models for Comparison ............................................................................................. 42 2.1 Safety Management in Rail Transit, Motor Carrier, and Railroads ............................... 42 2.1.1 Plans, Policies, and Organizational Structure ......................................................... 43 2.1.2 Management of Change .......................................................................................... 44 2.1.3 Safety Data Analysis ............................................................................................... 45 2.1.4 Operating Rules and Standards ............................................................................... 46 2.1.5 Training and Rules Compliance.............................................................................. 47 2.1.6 Audits and Inspections ............................................................................................ 48 2.1.7 Cybersecurity .......................................................................................................... 49 2.1.8 Preliminary Hazard Analyses ................................................................................. 49 2.1.9 Conclusion .............................................................................................................. 50 2.2 Fleet Management and Regulatory Lessons................................................................... 51 2.2.1 Motor Carrier and Car-Share Management ............................................................ 51 2.2.2 Ride-sharing Services ............................................................................................. 52 2.2.3 Positive Train Control ............................................................................................. 54 2.2.4 Past Safety Enhancements: Air Bags and Seat Belts .............................................. 55 2.2.5 Conclusion .............................................................................................................. 57 3 Findings and Recommendations ........................................................................................... 59 3.1 Safety Gaps and Solutions.............................................................................................. 59 3.2 Summary of Recommended Actions ............................................................................. 63 Transportation Resource Associates, Inc. ..................................................................................... 65 4 Appendices ............................................................................................................................ 66 4.1 Appendix 1: AV Development and Deployment Summary Tables ............................... 66 4.2 Appendix 2: AV Testing Accidents and Incidents ......................................................... 70 4.3 Appendix 3: Regulatory Framework Comparison Tables ............................................. 77 4.3.1 SSPP Elements ........................................................................................................ 77 Staying in Control: Bridging the Gaps in Autonomous Vehicle Safety Transportation
Recommended publications
  • Innovation in Ecosystem Business Models: an Application to Maas and Autonomous Vehicles in Urban Mobility System
    Innovation in ecosystem business models : An application to MaaS and Autonomous vehicles in urban mobility system Rodrigo Gandia To cite this version: Rodrigo Gandia. Innovation in ecosystem business models : An application to MaaS and Autonomous vehicles in urban mobility system. Economics and Finance. Université Paris-Saclay; University of Lavras, UFLA (Brésil), 2020. English. NNT : 2020UPASC018. tel-02895349 HAL Id: tel-02895349 https://tel.archives-ouvertes.fr/tel-02895349 Submitted on 9 Jul 2020 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Innovation in Ecosystem Business Models: An Application to MaaS and Autonomous Vehicles in Urban Mobility System Thèse de doctorat de l'université Paris-Saclay École doctorale n° 573 Interfaces : approches interdisciplinaires, fon- dements, applications et innovation (Interfaces) Spécialité de doctorat : Ingénierie des systèmes complexes Unité de recherche : Université Paris-Saclay, CentraleSupélec, Laboratoire Genie Industriel, 91190, Gif-sur-Yvette, France. Référent : CentraleSupélec Thèse présentée et
    [Show full text]
  • Autonomous Vehicle, Sensing and Communication Survey 1 Introduction
    Autonomous Vehicle, Sensing and Communication Survey Edited and submitted by Shraga Shoval Prepared by Shlomi Hacohen and Oded Medina Department of Mechanical Engineering, Ariel University, Ariel, Israel. August 2020 Abstract Autonomous vehicles introduce dramatic changes to the way in which we travel. This technology has the potential to impact the transportation across a wide array of categories including safety, congestion, and travel behavior. In this report we review the main issues involved in autonomous driving as discussed in the literature and shed light on topics that we believe require further development. 1 Introduction The challenges in autonomous driving require a combination of many capabilities, among them: localization, motion planning, vehicle’s systems control (steering, acceleration/deceleration, signaling, etc.), road perception, prediction of other road-users behavior, awareness of dangers, etc. These capabilities have a various level of importance for various levels of driving automation. Even though the first autonomous vehicle (AV) was experimented in 1926 [104], a real-modern autonomous vehicle was first presented in 1986 by a team from Carnegie Mellon University [58]. Since 2010, many major automotive manufacturers, such as GM, Mercedes Benz, Ford, Toyota, and many more are developing AVs [90]. A demonstration of AV equipped with numerous sensors and communication systems was presented by Toyota in 2013 [10]. In 2016, Google’s AV has passed over one million kilometers. These events present a glimpse to the landmarks in the development of AV that, due to the complexity of the task, progresses slowly with considerable amount of attention to safety and reliability. AVs need a large amount of data for reliable decision making.
    [Show full text]
  • Emerging Mobility Technologies and Trends
    Emerging Mobility Technologies and Trends And Their Role in Creating “Mobility-As-A-System” For the 21st Century and Beyond OWNERSHIP RIGHTS All reports are owned by Energy Systems Network (ESN) and protected by United States copyright and international copyright/intellectual property laws under applicable treaties and/or conventions. User agrees not to export any report into a country that does not have copyright/ intellectual property laws that will protect ESN’s rights therein. GRANT OF LICENSE RIGHTS ESN hereby grants user a non-exclusive, non-refundable, non- transferable Enterprise License, which allows you to (i) distribute the report within your organization across multiple locations to its representatives, employees or agents who are authorized by the organization to view the report in support of the organization’s internal business purposes; and (ii) display the report within your organization’s privately hosted internal intranet in support of your organization’s internal business purposes. Your right to distribute the report under an Enterprise License allows distribution among multiple locations or facilities to Authorized Users within your organization. ESN retains exclusive and sole ownership of this report. User agrees not to permit any unauthorized use, reproduction, distribution, publication or electronic transmission of any report or the information/forecasts therein without the express written permission of ESN. DISCLAIMER OF WARRANTY AND LIABILITY ESN has used its best efforts in collecting and preparing each report. ESN, its employees, affi liates, agents, and licensors do not warrant the accuracy, completeness, correctness, non-infringement, merchantability, or fi tness for a particular purpose of any reports covered by this agreement.
    [Show full text]
  • Michigan Strategic Fund
    MICHIGAN STRATEGIC FUND MEMORANDUM DATE: March 12, 2021 TO: The Honorable Gretchen Whitmer, Governor of Michigan Members of the Michigan Legislature FROM: Mark Burton, President, Michigan Strategic Fund SUBJECT: FY 2020 MSF/MEDC Annual Report The Michigan Strategic Fund (MSF) is required to submit an annual report to the Governor and the Michigan Legislature summarizing activities and program spending for the previous fiscal year. This requirement is contained within the Michigan Strategic Fund Act (Public Act 270 of 1984) and budget boilerplate. Attached you will find the annual report for the MSF and the Michigan Economic Development Corporation (MEDC) as required in by Section 1004 of Public Act 166 of 2020 as well as the consolidated MSF Act reporting requirements found in Section 125.2009 of the MSF Act. Additionally, you will find an executive summary at the forefront of the report that provides a year-in-review snapshot of activities, including COVID-19 relief programs to support Michigan businesses and communities. To further consolidate legislative reporting, the attachment includes the following budget boilerplate reports: • Michigan Business Development Program and Michigan Community Revitalization Program amendments (Section 1006) • Corporate budget, revenue, expenditures/activities and state vs. corporate FTEs (Section 1007) • Jobs for Michigan Investment Fund (Section 1010) • Michigan Film incentives status (Section 1032) • Michigan Film & Digital Media Office activities ( Section 1033) • Business incubators and accelerators annual report (Section 1034) The following programs are not included in the FY 2020 report: • The Community College Skilled Trades Equipment Program was created in 2015 to provide funding to community colleges to purchase equipment required for educational programs in high-wage, high-skill, and high-demand occupations.
    [Show full text]
  • Electric Vehicle Roadmap
    TABLE OF CONTENTS Acknowledgments ......................................................................................................... ii Introduction to the Roadmap ....................................................................................... 1 1. Our Focus .................................................................................................................. 3 1.1 Shared Vision and Mission ............................................................................................................ 3 1.2 Aspiration ...................................................................................................................................... 3 1.3 Guiding Principles ......................................................................................................................... 4 2. Our Action .................................................................................................................. 6 2.1 Roadmap Framework .................................................................................................................... 6 2.2 Opportunity Areas and Initiatives .................................................................................................. 6 2.2.1 Driving Charging Infrastructure Availability ...................................................................... 6 2.2.2 Driving Awareness ............................................................................................................ 8 2.2.3 Driving Innovative and Supportive Policies .....................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Using Fuzzy Logic in Automated Vehicle Control
    Intelligent Transportation Systems Using Fuzzy Logic in Automated Vehicle Control José E. Naranjo, Carlos González, Ricardo García, and Teresa de Pedro, Instituto de Automática Industrial Miguel A. Sotelo, Universidad de Alcalá de Henares ntil recently, in-vehicle computing has been largely relegated to auxiliary U tasks such as regulating cabin temperature, opening doors, and monitoring Automated versions fuel, oil, and battery-charge levels. Now, however, computers are increasingly assum- of a mass-produced ing driving-related tasks in some commercial models. Among those tasks are vehicle use fuzzy logic • maintaining a reference velocity or keeping a safe nomous robots and fuzzy control systems and the distance from other vehicles, Universidad de Alcalá de Henares’s knowledge of techniques to both • improving night vision with infrared cameras, and artificial vision. (The “Intelligent-Vehicle Systems” • building maps and providing alternative routes. sidebar discusses other such projects.) We’re devel- address common oping a testbed infrastructure for vehicle driving that Still, many traffic situations remain complex and includes control-system experimentation, strategies, challenges and difficult to manage, particularly in urban settings. and sensors. All of our facilities and instruments are The driving task belongs to a class of problems that available for collaboration with other research groups incorporate human depend on underlying systems for logical reasoning in this field. So far, we’ve automated and instru- and dealing with uncertainty. So, to move vehicle mented two Citroën Berlingo mass-produced vans procedural knowledge computers beyond monitoring and into tasks related to carry out our objectives. to environment perception or driving, we must inte- into the vehicle control grate aspects of human intelligence and behaviors Automated-vehicle equipment so that vehicles can manage driving actuators in a Figure 1 shows two mass-produced electric Cit- algorithms.
    [Show full text]
  • SAE International® PROGRESS in TECHNOLOGY SERIES Downloaded from SAE International by Eric Anderson, Thursday, September 10, 2015
    Downloaded from SAE International by Eric Anderson, Thursday, September 10, 2015 Connectivity and the Mobility Industry Edited by Dr. Andrew Brown, Jr. SAE International® PROGRESS IN TECHNOLOGY SERIES Downloaded from SAE International by Eric Anderson, Thursday, September 10, 2015 Connectivity and the Mobility Industry Downloaded from SAE International by Eric Anderson, Thursday, September 10, 2015 Other SAE books of interest: Green Technologies and the Mobility Industry By Dr. Andrew Brown, Jr. (Product Code: PT-146) Active Safety and the Mobility Industry By Dr. Andrew Brown, Jr. (Product Code: PT-147) Automotive 2030 – North America By Bruce Morey (Product Code: T-127) Multiplexed Networks for Embedded Systems By Dominique Paret (Product Code: R-385) For more information or to order a book, contact SAE International at 400 Commonwealth Drive, Warrendale, PA 15096-0001, USA phone 877-606-7323 (U.S. and Canada) or 724-776-4970 (outside U.S. and Canada); fax 724-776-0790; e-mail [email protected]; website http://store.sae.org. Downloaded from SAE International by Eric Anderson, Thursday, September 10, 2015 Connectivity and the Mobility Industry By Dr. Andrew Brown, Jr. Warrendale, Pennsylvania, USA Copyright © 2011 SAE International. eISBN: 978-0-7680-7461-1 Downloaded from SAE International by Eric Anderson, Thursday, September 10, 2015 400 Commonwealth Drive Warrendale, PA 15096-0001 USA E-mail: [email protected] Phone: 877-606-7323 (inside USA and Canada) 724-776-4970 (outside USA) Fax: 724-776-0790 Copyright © 2011 SAE International. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, distributed, or transmitted, in any form or by any means without the prior written permission of SAE.
    [Show full text]
  • Global Autonomous Driving Market Outlook, 2018
    Global Autonomous Driving Market Outlook, 2018 The Global Autonomous Driving Market is Expected Grow up to $173.15 B by 2030, with Shared Mobility Services Contributing to 65.31% Global Automotive & Transportation Research Team at Frost & Sullivan K24A-18 March 2018 Contents Section Slide Number Executive Summary 7 2017 Key Highlights 8 Leading Players in terms of AD Patents Filed in 2017 10 Sensors Currently Used Across Applications 11 Next Generations of Sensor Fusion 12 Future Approach in Hardware and Software toward L5 Automation 13 Level 3 Automated Vehicles—What could be new? 14 2018 Top 5 Predictions 15 Research Scope and Segmentation 16 Research Scope 17 Vehicle Segmentation 18 Market Definition—Rise of Automation 19 Key Questions this Study will Answer 20 Impact of Autonomous Vehicles Driving Development of Vital Facets in 21 Business and Technology K24A-18 2 Contents (continued) Section Slide Number Transformational Impact of Automation on the Industry 22 Impact on the Development of Next-Generation Depth Sensing 23 Impact on Ownership and User-ship Structures 24 Impact of Autonomous Driving on Future Vehicle Design 25 Impact of Investments on Technology Development 26 Major Market and Technology Trends in Automated Driving—2018 27 Top Trends Driving the Autonomous Driving Market—2018 28 Market Trends 29 1. Autonomous Shared Mobility Solutions 30 Case Study—Waymo 31 2. Collective Intelligence for Fleet Management 32 Case Study—BestMile 33 3. Cyber Security of Autonomous Cars 34 Case Study—Karamba Security 35 K24A-18 3 Contents (continued) Section Slide Number Technology Trends 36 1. Convergence of Artificial Intelligence and Automated Driving 37 Case Study—Mobileye 38 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Connected and Autonomous Vehicles: Implications for Policy and Practice in City and Transportation Planning
    Connected and Autonomous Vehicles: Implications for Policy and Practice in City and Transportation Planning by Charles Ng supervised by Laura Taylor A Major Paper submitted to the Faculty of Environmental Studies in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master in Environmental Studies York University, Toronto, Ontario, Canada December 8, 2017 Acknowledgments This paper could not have been completed without the help and support of the caring individuals that I am thankful to have in my life. I would like to thank and acknowledge my mother, Maria, and my sister, Ka Lang for providing me with love and support; my advisor, Peter Timmerman, and my supervisor, Laura Taylor, for providing me with academic and non-academic support; and my invaluable friends that I have made in the MES program for their encouragement, support and relief. i Foreword My Area of Concentration for my Plan of Study is sustainable transportation planning for growth management. Connected and Autonomous Vehicles will change the urban landscape, the roles of governments and present new challenges to planners. This paper has allowed me to view transportation planning through the lens of emerging technologies and how this affects cities in the short and long term. There are many sustainability and growth management implications with Connected and Autonomous Vehicles. For example, automated vehicles can foster decentralization because it easily enables travel however, if utilized correctly, automated vehicles can also compliment local transit systems to support intensification. This is especially important in Ontario (Canada’s first province to allow testing of autonomous vehicles on public roads) as it directly relates to the goals and policies related to sprawl and sustainability as outlined in Ontario’s four provincial land use plans: The Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe (GGH), The Greenbelt Plan, The Oak Ridges Moraine Conservation Plan and the Niagara Escarpment Plan.
    [Show full text]
  • Auto Innovators-GAMA Amicus Brief
    Nos. 19-368 and 19-369 IN THE Supreme Court of the United States FORD MOTOR COMPANY, Petitioner, v. MONTANA EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, et al., Respondents. FORD MOTOR COMPANY, Petitioner, v. ADAM BANDEMER, Respondent. On Writs of Certiorari to the Supreme Court of Montana and the Supreme Court of Minnesota BRIEF FOR THE ALLIANCE FOR AUTOMOTIVE INNOVATION AND GENERAL AVIATION MANUFACTURERS ASSOCIATION AS AMICI CURIAE IN SUPPORT OF PETITIONER DARRYL M. WOO JAIME A. SANTOS GOODWIN PROCTER LLP Counsel of Record Three Embarcadero Center STEPHEN R. SHAW San Francisco, CA 94111 GOODWIN PROCTER LLP (415) 733-6000 1900 N St., NW Washington, DC 20036 [email protected] (202) 346-4000 Counsel for Amici Curiae March 6, 2020 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page INTEREST OF THE AMICI CURIAE ...................... 1 SUMMARY OF THE ARGUMENT ........................... 3 ARGUMENT............................................................... 6 I. The decisions of the Minnesota and Montana Supreme Courts erase the clear line between general and specific personal jurisdiction. ................................... 6 II. This Court should reject respondents’ unlimited stream-of-commerce theory. ..... 12 III. Respondents’ no-causation rule will create massive uncertainty and increase litigation over threshold jurisdictional issues. .................................. 22 IV. Respondents’ rule would have a particularly pernicious impact on foreign manufacturers. .............................. 24 CONCLUSION ......................................................... 29 i TABLE OF AUTHORITIES Page(s) Cases Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., 137 S. Ct. 1773 (2017) ...................................passim Burger King Corp. v. Rudzewicz, 471 U.S. 462 (1985) .......................................... 6, 12 Daimler AG v. Bauman, 571 U.S. 117 (2014) .................. 2, 5, 7, 8, 12, 26, 27 D’Jamoos ex rel. Estate of Weingeroff v. Pilatus Aircraft Ltd., 566 F.3d 94 (3d Cir.
    [Show full text]
  • DRIVE PILOT: an Automated Driving System for the Highway Introducing DRIVE PILOT: an Automated Driving System for the Highway Table of Contents
    Introducing DRIVE PILOT: An Automated Driving System for the Highway Introducing DRIVE PILOT: An Automated Driving System for the Highway Table of Contents Introduction 4 Validation Methods 36 Our Vision for Automated Driving 5 Integrated Verification Testing 36 The Safety Heritage of Mercedes-Benz 6 Field Operation Testing 38 Levels of Driving Automation 8 Validation of Environmental Perception and Positioning 40 On the Road to Automated Driving: Virtual On-Road Testing 42 Intelligent World Drive on Five Continents 12 Validation of Driver Interaction 44 Final Customer-Oriented On-Road Validation 44 Functional Description of DRIVE PILOT 14 How does DRIVE PILOT work? 16 Security, Data Policy and Legal Framework 46 Vehicle Cybersecurity 46 General Design Rules of DRIVE PILOT 18 Heritage, Cooperation, Continuous Improvement 47 Operational Design Domain 18 Data Recording 48 Object and Event Detection and Response 20 Federal, State and Local Laws and Regulations 49 Human Machine Interface 23 Consumer Education and Training 50 Fallback and Minimal Risk Condition 25 Conclusion 52 Safety Design Rules 26 Safety Process 28 Crashworthiness 30 During a Crash 32 After a Crash 35 Introduction Ever since Carl Benz invented the automobile in 1886, Mercedes-Benz vehicles proudly bearing the three-pointed star have been setting standards in vehicle safety. Daimler AG, the manufacturer of all Mercedes-Benz vehicles, continues to refine and advance the field of safety in road traffic through the groundbreaking Mercedes-Benz “Intelligent Drive” assistance systems, which are increasingly connected as they set new milestones on the road to fully automated driving. 4 Introduction Our Vision for Automated Driving Mercedes-Benz envisions a future with fewer traffic accidents, less stress, and greater enjoyment and productivity for road travelers.
    [Show full text]
  • Towards a Viable Autonomous Driving Research Platform
    Towards a Viable Autonomous Driving Research Platform Junqing Wei, Jarrod M. Snider, Junsung Kim, John M. Dolan, Raj Rajkumar and Bakhtiar Litkouhi Abstract— We present an autonomous driving research vehi- cle with minimal appearance modifications that is capable of a wide range of autonomous and intelligent behaviors, including smooth and comfortable trajectory generation and following; lane keeping and lane changing; intersection handling with or without V2I and V2V; and pedestrian, bicyclist, and workzone detection. Safety and reliability features include a fault-tolerant computing system; smooth and intuitive autonomous-manual switching; and the ability to fully disengage and power down the drive-by-wire and computing system upon E-stop. The vehicle has been tested extensively on both a closed test field and public roads. I. INTRODUCTION Fig. 1: The CMU autonomous vehicle research platform in Imagining autonomous passenger cars in mass production road test has been difficult for many years. Reliability, safety, cost, appearance and social acceptance are only a few of the legitimate concerns. Advances in state-of-the-art software with simple driving scenarios, including distance keeping, and sensing have afforded great improvements in reliability lane changing and intersection handling [14], [6], [3], [12]. and safe operation of autonomous vehicles in real-world The NAVLAB project at Carnegie Mellon University conditions. As autonomous driving technologies make the (CMU) has built a series of experimental platforms since transition from laboratories to the real world, so must the the 1990s which are able to run autonomously on freeways vehicle platforms used to test and develop them. The next [13], but they can only drive within a single lane.
    [Show full text]