Fn Ee Rw Ms I

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Fn Ee Rw Ms I F N E E R W M S I FERMILAB AU.S. DEPARTMENT OF E NERGY L ABORATORY Learning and Growing 8 Photo courtesy Iowa State University Volume 25 INSIDE: Friday, April 19, 2002 Number 7 2 THE Question 6 The Larger View f 12 Commuter Special 14 Upward Bound INTERACTIONS Communicating particle physics in the 21st century Join the dialogue: This week’s question for THETHE discussion: What’s your response to THE Question? QuestionQuestion To: Fermilab Public Affairs Subject: THE Question I have worked at Fermilab for 12-plus years. Often in conversation I’m asked about Fermilab, and the one question that always comes up is, “What good is the information you’re discovering?” So what I’m looking for is examples I can give them. I have heard that the physics we are doing and the results we find are 20 years ahead of their time. Meaning we won’t realize what to do with the information for a very long time. Anyway, I’d like your help to answer this one ‘special’ question. Email from a Fermilab employee Respond online at by Judy Jackson www.fnal.gov/pub/ferminews/ interactions/index.html “What good is the information you’re discovering?” or send email to Generations of particle physicists have grappled with this question, and many [email protected] have attempted to address it, from various perspectives and with varying success. At a time when THE question is gaining insistence in the national dialogue on science policy, it may be useful to take another critical look at the reasons why we do particle physics research and how both we and others perceive its value for our nation and the world. 2 FERMINEWS Friday, April 19, 2002 UNDERSTANDING THE UNIVERSE FOR UNDERSTANDING’S SAKE “What, then,” Albert Einstein, asked, “impels us to devise theory after theory? Why do we devise theories at all? The answer is simply: because we enjoy ‘comprehending’.… There exists a passion for comprehending, just as there exists a passion for music.” For most particle physicists, this passion for comprehending is surely why they have chosen high-energy physics—for what Einstein called the “joy and amazement at the beauty and grandeur Photo by Fred Ullrich of this world of which man can just form a faint “Joy and amazement at the beauty and grandeur of this world of which man can just form a notion…” faint notion.” —Albert Einstein Many of Einstein’s successors continue to uphold UNDERSTANDING THE UNIVERSE the view that basic science represents human BECAUSE IT PAYS OFF potential and civilization at their highest and best, the kind of endeavor that characterizes a great The results of basic science, however, very often nation. While particle physics may ultimately have benefits for society that go beyond the mere contribute to the security and economic well-being joy of understanding. In a 1996 speech, Nobel of society, this reasoning goes, its true worth lies Prize winner and former Fermilab Director Leon in the understanding of the ultimate nature of Lederman put it this way: the universe. As Frank Oppenheimer once said, “In 1680,” Lederman said, “Understanding is a lot like sex. It’s got a practical “Isaac Newton worked on purpose, but that’s not why people do it normally.” the abstract problem of Unlike sex, however, the passion for comprehend- gravity and changed the ing may not hold the same thrill for other audiences world. In 1820, Michael that it has for particle physicists. In a February Faraday discovered a keynote address to the American Association for connection between the the Advancement of Science, Office of Science exotic phenomena of Photo by Reidar Hahn Leon Lederman: “The more and Technology Policy Director John Marburger electricity and magnetism, exotic, the more abstract the discussed government support for particle physics and his discoveries knowledge, the more profound and astronomy. electrified the world. will be its consequences.” Einstein’s 1905 conceptual ”The justification for funding these fields,” obsession with space and time led to nuclear Marburger said, “rests entirely on the usefulness energy and the operation of accelerators for of the technology needed for the quest, and on the knowledge, for cancer therapy and for machines joy we experience in simply knowing how nature that provide luminescent x-ray photographs of works. (A joy, I am afraid, that is shared fully by viruses and toxins. In 1897, the ‘useless’ electron a rapidly declining fraction of the population.)” was discovered. In 1977, Fermilab discovered (Italics added.) the bottom quark and in 1995, the top quark was Is the joy of particle physics apparent only to found. The lessons of history are clear—the more particle cognoscenti? In a March 26 story on exotic, the more abstract the knowledge, the more the beauty of physics, New York Times writer profound will be its consequences.” Dennis Overbye wrote that while Einstein The down side of the usefulness of particle physics “maintained that it should be possible to explain to society is the unpredictability of the payoff. By scientific principles in words to a child… his definition, the applications of basic science are followers often argue that words alone cannot unknown—if we could predict them, it would be convey the glories of physics, that there is a beauty applied science, and those who stood to benefit apparent only to the mathematically adept.” would fund it. But basic science is inherently risky. If that is true, it may be awhile before the glories Who knows how or when its results will bear fruit, of physics take hold in the general population. or whom they will benefit? FERMINEWS Friday, April 19, 2002 3 INTERACTIONS Everything, after all, is made from subatomic particles. Once you have a concise theory explaining Communicating particle physics how they work, the rest should just be filigree.” st in the 21 century The ultimate goal of particle physics, the “grand unification” of all the particle and forces, will, the Perhaps the best-known application of fundamental joke goes, reduce the complexity of the universe to physics came from the development of the atomic a single law that can fit on the back of a T-shirt. bomb in the Manhattan Project in World War II. (“I discovered grand unification and all I got was Throughout the cold war, support for high-energy this lousy T-shirt”?) physics stayed strong—just in case, many believe, the nation needed a new Manhattan Project. Today, But this reductionist perspective, the view that, the case for a connection between particle physics ultimately, it all comes down to particles, may be and security appears less compelling. Despite in trouble. Perhaps, say other scientists, it’s high-level warnings of the potential impact on more complicated than that. Complex systems national security, federal funding for the physical don’t necessarily reduce to the interactions of sciences continues to fall. fundamental particles, according to some solid- state physicists. In the words of Nobel Prize “Defense Department Agency Severs Its Ties to winner Philip Anderson, “More is different.” an Elite Panel of Scientists,” read the headline in a March 23 New York Times story by James Glanz For at least some scientists, a simple theory of on the end of a decades-long relationship between everything may simply be irrelevant. In Marburger’s the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, words to the AAAS audience, science is “finally or DARPA, and a group known as Jason, an within reach of a new frontier, the frontier of “advisory panel of elite scientists,” including some complexity.” of the nation’s best-known particle physicists. ARTICLE PHYSICS AND THE FABRIC The story quoted the Defense Department on the P reason for the change: “…a spokeswoman said OF SCIENCE the move was in fact a reflection of Jason’s inability High Energy Physics Advisory Panel Chair Fred to adjust its priorities to a post-cold-war world, Gilman recently emphasized the interconnected- where the physical sciences are no longer as ness of science in a letter accompanying HEPAP’s important as information and computer sciences Long-Range Plan for the Future of High-Energy to the nation’s security.” Does all science come Physics. down to particles? Not THE UNIVERSE ON A T- SHIRT “One cannot tell where the next scientific or necessarily. “More is technical breakthrough will occur,” Gilman wrote, different,” say many Boston University theorist Ken Lane is frustrated “or what combination of fields it will depend solid-state physicists. that particle physics is a hard sell compared to, upon….An effort to revitalize the physical sciences say, research on the human genome. is needed not only because of their intrinsic “I don’t get it,” Lane said recently. “Particle physics importance, but because of the coupling of is the most fascinating science that there is. And progress across the sciences.” I’ll tell you one thing: there was physics long As an example of such connections, particle before there was DNA, and long after there isn’t physicists like to cite former NIH director Harold any more DNA there will still be physics.” Varmus’s 2000 statement that today’s spectacular Perhaps only a physicist would find that a advances in medical science would not have comforting thought. occurred without the previous work of high-energy While Lane’s invidious comparison of physics and physicists, chemists and other basic scientists. DNA may be faulted for a certain lack of political Particle physicists tend to find Varmus’s argument correctness, his frustration reflects a long-held view convincing—but not everyone responds that way. that particle physics has a unique place among the David Kramer, of Science and Government Report, sciences, namely that when you get down to it, reported on the release of HEPAP’s Long Range particle physics is the basis for them all.
Recommended publications
  • Nfap Policy Brief » O C T O B E R 2017
    NATIONAL FOUNDATION FOR AMERICAN POLICY NFAP POLICY BRIEF» O CTOBER 2017 IMMIGRANTS AND NOBEL PRIZES : 1901- 2017 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Immigrants have been awarded 39 percent, or 33 of 85, of the Nobel Prizes won by Americans in Chemistry, Medicine and Physics since 2000. In 2017, the sole American winner of the Nobel Prize in Chemistry was an immigrant, Joachim Frank, a Columbia University professor born in Germany. Immigrant Reiner Weiss, who was born in Germany and came to the United States as a teenager, was awarded the 2017 Nobel Prize in Physics, sharing it with two other Americans, Kip S. Thorne and Barry C. Barish. In 2016, all 6 American winners of the Nobel Prize in economics and scientific fields were immigrants. These achievements by immigrants point to the gains to America of welcoming talent from across the globe. It does not mean America should welcome only Nobel Prize winners. Such a policy would be impossible to implement, since most immigrant Nobel Prize winners enter the United States many years before being awarded this honor. Most people immigrate to another country in their 20s, particularly employment-based immigrants, who either study in America or come here to work shortly after obtaining a degree abroad. The average of age of Nobel Prize winners at the time of the award is 59.5 years, according to economist Mark J. Perry.1 Table 1 Immigrant Nobel Prize Winners in Chemistry, Medicine and Physics Since 2000 Immigrant Nobel Winners Since 2000 33 of 85 American winners have been immigrants Percentage of Immigrant Winners Since 2000 39% Source: Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences, National Foundation for American Policy, George Mason University Institute for Immigration Research.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Report
    Revealing the Hidden Nature of Space and Time: Charting the Course for Elementary Particle Physics Committee on Elementary Particle Physics in the 21st Century, National Research Council ISBN: 0-309-66039-4, 176 pages, 7 x 10, (2006) This free PDF was downloaded from: http://www.nap.edu/catalog/11641.html Visit the National Academies Press online, the authoritative source for all books from the National Academy of Sciences, the National Academy of Engineering, the Institute of Medicine, and the National Research Council: • Download hundreds of free books in PDF • Read thousands of books online, free • Sign up to be notified when new books are published • Purchase printed books • Purchase PDFs • Explore with our innovative research tools Thank you for downloading this free PDF. If you have comments, questions or just want more information about the books published by the National Academies Press, you may contact our customer service department toll-free at 888-624-8373, visit us online, or send an email to [email protected]. This free book plus thousands more books are available at http://www.nap.edu. Copyright © National Academy of Sciences. Permission is granted for this material to be shared for noncommercial, educational purposes, provided that this notice appears on the reproduced materials, the Web address of the online, full authoritative version is retained, and copies are not altered. To disseminate otherwise or to republish requires written permission from the National Academies Press. Revealing the Hidden Nature of Space and Time: Charting the Course for Elementary Particle Physics http://www.nap.edu/catalog/11641.html REVEALING THE HIDDEN NATURE OF SPACE AND TIME Charting the Course for Elementary Particle Physics Committee on Elementary Particle Physics in the 21st Century Board on Physics and Astronomy Division on Engineering and Physical Sciences THE NATIONAL ACADEMIES PRESS Washington, D.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Physicists at Work Interactions
    A Inter ctions across physics and education September/October 2007 Focal Point Physicists at Work Inside: Career Paths, Profiled Physics Majors, Uncovered Writing About Science and introducing “Homer Dodge's Notebook” Interactions Inter ctions MAGAZINE across physics and education Issue Editor: John S. Rigden Managing Editor: Daryl Malloy Production Editor: Lissa Reynolds About INTERACTIONS Assistant Editor: Steve Davolt Interactions is a general-interest magazine about physics education. Our mission is to inform and stimulate diverse conversations on teaching and Design: Matthew Payne learning by publishing thought-provoking news, analysis, and commentary Contributing Design: Ayah Oweis on the people, programs, and policies that interact to influence scientific practices and knowledge—and, ultimately, human destiny. Contributing Editors Jane Chambers, Rachel Ivie, Rachel Safier, Reader Comments Pamela Brown, Patrick Mulvey, Martha Heil The editors welcome your response. Send comments, questions or suggestions Publisher: Toufic M. Hakim to [email protected] or mail letters to Interactions Forum, One Physics Communications Director: Robert Headrick Ellipse, 5th Floor, College Park, MD 20740. Please include your full name, mailing address, and daytime contact information. Space is limited and all Editorial Advisory Panel Juan Burciaga published comments are subject to editing. Whitman College, WA Christopher Chiaverina Contributor Guidelines New Trier High School, IL Although most of the articles are commissioned by the editors, we encourage Warren Hein writer queries and story ideas. Email your query, and attach any writing samples, American Association of Physics Teachers, MD to [email protected]. Or mail the letter along with samples to Interactions Robert Hilborn Editor, One Physics Ellipse, College Park, MD 20740.
    [Show full text]
  • The Future of Fermilab
    CERN & Fermilab LHC & Neutrinos Nigel S. Lockyer CERN Council 3/16/2015 P5 Report…still very impactful in Washington • P5 report has had and is having a major impact on US planning for particle physics because: – Excellent report that made difficult choices and has focused field – Community support very high • Secretary of Energy has expressed strong support for report because of community support • P5 top priorities: LHC and Neutrinos Nigel Lockyer | CERN Council 2015 CERN/DOE Agreement: The Signers…Moniz, Heuer, Cordova Nigel Lockyer | CERN Council 2015 CERN & Fermilab….together we are stronger • CERN is the world’s leading high energy lab now that Fermilab has relinquished the energy frontier with closing of Tevatron • CERN is mandated to “steward” all European particle physics • Fermilab is only “single program” HEP laboratory in US • CERN needs the US to execute the HL-LHC successfully and we need CERN to help with LBNF • By supporting a world class long baseline neutrino program in US, CERN is supporting the European neutrino community • CERN and Fermilab both have tremendous technical depth • Interests & technology overlap on FCC • Success of both CERN & Fermilab are highly intertwined Nigel Lockyer | CERN Council 2015 NY Times:U.S. & European Scientists Sign Cooperation Pact • “a model for the kinds of international scientific collaboration that can enable breakthrough insights and innovations.”…John Holdren, President’s Science Advisor • “This agreement is also historic since it formalizes CERN’s participation in U.S.-based programs such as prospective future neutrino facilities for the first time.” Rolf Heuer DG CERN • “Our research programs in the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • David Norman Schramm October 25, 1945–December 19, 1997
    NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES D AVID NORMAN SCHRAMM 1 9 4 5 — 1 9 9 7 A Biographical Memoir by M I C H A E L S . T URNER Any opinions expressed in this memoir are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Academy of Sciences. Biographical Memoir COPYRIGHT 2009 NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES WASHINGTON, D.C. DAVID NORMAN SCHRAMM October 25, 1945–December 19, 1997 B Y MICHAEL S . TURNER “ E LIVED LARGE IN ALL DIMENSIONS.” That is how Leon HLederman began his eulogy of David N. Schramm at a memorial service held in Aspen, Colorado, in December 1997. His large presence in space went beyond his 6-foot, 4-inch, 240-pound frame and bright red hair. In spite of his tragic death in a plane crash at age 52, Schramm lived large in the time dimension, too. At 18, he was married, a father, and a freshman physics major at MIT. After receiving his Ph.D. in physics from Caltech at 25, Schramm joined the faculty at the University of Texas at Austin. He left for Chicago two years later, and became the chair of the Astronomy and Astrophysics Department at the University of Chicago at age 2. He was elected to the National Academy of Sciences in 1986 at 40, became chair of the National Research Council’s Board on Physics and Astronomy at 47, and two years later became vice president for research at Chicago. He also had time for mountain climbing, summiting the highest peaks in five of the seven continents (missing Asia and Antarctica), driving a red Porsche with license plates that read “Big Bang,” and flying—owning four airplanes over his 12-year flying career and logging hundreds of hours annually.
    [Show full text]
  • Can a Computer Devise a Theory of Everything? - the New York Times 14/01/21, 1041
    Can a Computer Devise a Theory of Everything? - The New York Times 14/01/21, 1041 https://nyti.ms/3383jwx OUT THERE Can a Computer Devise a Theory of Everything? It might be possible, physicists say, but not anytime soon. And there’s no guarantee that we humans will understand the result. By Dennis Overbye Nov. 23, 2020 Once upon a time, Albert Einstein described scientific theories as “free inventions of the human mind.” But in 1980, Stephen Hawking, the renowned Cambridge University cosmologist, had another thought. In a lecture that year, he argued that the so-called Theory of Everything might be achievable, but that the final touches on it were likely to be done by computers. “The end might not be in sight for theoretical physics,” he said. “But it might be in sight for theoretical physicists.” The Theory of Everything is still not in sight, but with computers taking over many of the chores in life — translating languages, recognizing faces, driving cars, recommending whom to date — it is not so crazy to imagine them taking over from the Hawkings and the Einsteins of the world. Computer programs like DeepMind’s AlphaGo keep discovering new ways to beat humans at games like Go and chess, which have been studied and played for centuries. Why couldn’t one of these marvelous learning machines, let loose on an enormous astronomical catalog or the petabytes of data compiled by the Large Hadron Collider, discern a set of new fundamental particles or discover a wormhole to another galaxy in the outer solar system, like the one in the movie “Interstellar”? At least that’s the dream.
    [Show full text]
  • Tevatron Physics
    Tevatron Physics Welcome new Fermilab director Nigel Lockyer Reinhard Schwienhorst Outline • Tevatron proton-antiproton collider • Heavy flavor production • QCD events • Electroweak results • Top quark measurements • Higgs boson coupling to fermions • Conclusions 2 Reinhard Schwienhorst Tevatron at Fermilab •Run II from 2002 to 2011 •CDF and D0: 400 + 400 members from 60 + 70 institutions 3 Reinhard Schwienhorst Tevatron collider in Run II • proton-antiproton collider • 1.96 TeV • 12 fb-1 delivered • 10 fb-1 recorded per experiment • 10 pByte dataset (incl. MC) per experiment 4 Reinhard Schwienhorst Unique Tevatron physics • proton-antiproton collider - quark-antiquark interactions - top pairs - forward-backward asymmetries - single top in the s-channel • lower CM energy - Higgs to bb in associated production - lower QCD background - coupling to fermions • Much less pileup than LHC - clean events, low trigger thresholds - precision top quark mass - precision W boson mass 5 Reinhard Schwienhorst Heavy flavor physics • Trigger and detector systems for heavy flavor - low-pT di-muons and regular reversal of B field (DØ) - track trigger and high-precision tracking (CDF) 6 Reinhard Schwienhorst CP Asymmetries • Tevatron Proton-Antiproton initial state - CP conserving • Look for neutral meson mixing • Look for asymmetries in heavy flavor decay rates • Sensitive to new physics - in weak and strong interactions 7 Reinhard Schwienhorst Like-sign di-muon asymmetry • DØ di-muon asymmetry in semi-leptonic B decays - Significance 3.9 s.d. PRD 84, 052007
    [Show full text]
  • Not Yet Imagined: a Study of Hubble Space Telescope Operations
    NOT YET IMAGINED A STUDY OF HUBBLE SPACE TELESCOPE OPERATIONS CHRISTOPHER GAINOR NOT YET IMAGINED NOT YET IMAGINED A STUDY OF HUBBLE SPACE TELESCOPE OPERATIONS CHRISTOPHER GAINOR National Aeronautics and Space Administration Office of Communications NASA History Division Washington, DC 20546 NASA SP-2020-4237 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Names: Gainor, Christopher, author. | United States. NASA History Program Office, publisher. Title: Not Yet Imagined : A study of Hubble Space Telescope Operations / Christopher Gainor. Description: Washington, DC: National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Office of Communications, NASA History Division, [2020] | Series: NASA history series ; sp-2020-4237 | Includes bibliographical references and index. | Summary: “Dr. Christopher Gainor’s Not Yet Imagined documents the history of NASA’s Hubble Space Telescope (HST) from launch in 1990 through 2020. This is considered a follow-on book to Robert W. Smith’s The Space Telescope: A Study of NASA, Science, Technology, and Politics, which recorded the development history of HST. Dr. Gainor’s book will be suitable for a general audience, while also being scholarly. Highly visible interactions among the general public, astronomers, engineers, govern- ment officials, and members of Congress about HST’s servicing missions by Space Shuttle crews is a central theme of this history book. Beyond the glare of public attention, the evolution of HST becoming a model of supranational cooperation amongst scientists is a second central theme. Third, the decision-making behind the changes in Hubble’s instrument packages on servicing missions is chronicled, along with HST’s contributions to our knowledge about our solar system, our galaxy, and our universe.
    [Show full text]
  • Neutrinos Are Everywhere: Towards a New Understanding of the Quantum Universe
    Neutrinos are Everywhere: Towards a New Understanding of the Quantum Universe Nigel S. Lockyer Princeton University 6/17/2016 2 Nigel Lockyer | Princeton June 2016 First Baby Bison Arrives 2016…National Mammal… 3 Nigel Lockyer | Princeton June 2016 Government wants to check they are Bison Recent Genetic Analysis of Herd…they are bison 4 Nigel Lockyer | Princeton June 2016 Coyotes down selected in national mammal competition 5 Nigel Lockyer | Princeton June 2016 International Particle Physics Community Convergence • 2013: European Strategy for Particle Physics updated - Endorsed high priority of neutrino physics - Bottom line: CERN should help the European neutrino community participate in a long-baseline program outside of Europe • 2014: “P5” Plan - A strategic plan for U.S. particle physics maximizing opportunities for breakthrough science - Explicit prioritization, hard choices made within realistic budget scenarios - Particle physics community unified behind the plan: 2,331 signatures on letter sent to Secretary Moniz 6 Nigel Lockyer | Princeton June 2016 CERN/DOE/NSF Agreement: Signers…Moniz, Heuer, Cordova 7 Nigel Lockyer | Princeton June 2016 Neutrino Protocol…signed recently at CERN CERN and Fermilab’s futures are completely intertwined for next several decades …..as never before 8 Nigel Lockyer | Princeton June 2016 Major news: Signing of US-CERN Protocols In December, the United States and the European physics laboratory CERN signed an agreement to partner on continued research at the Large Hadron Collider, upcoming neutrino research
    [Show full text]
  • Fermilab Strategy and Vision
    Fermilab Strategy and Vision Nigel Lockyer, Laboratory Director Users Meeting 10 August 2020 Diversity and Inclusion – Lab Priority Science community and lab leadership imperative - Following AIP Strategic Framework - Support for community action (Particles for Justice, ShutDownStem, etc.) Actions focused on lasting change • Listening sessions with Lab Resource Groups; response plan developed to address concerns • Action plans for Climate Survey feedback at Lab, Division, Section levels • Changes to hiring, personnel evaluation, and career planning processes • Analysis of equity in positions, promotions, pay, performance reviews, awards processes • New Chief Equity, Diversity and Inclusion Officer role – internal/external communications on EDI, diversity outreach, resource groups 2 8/7/2020 Nigel Lockyer | 53rd Fermilab Users (Virtual Meeting) 3 8/7/2020 Nigel Lockyer | 53rd Fermilab Users (Virtual Meeting) P5 Science Drivers of Particle Physics Higgs boson Neutrinos Dark matter Dark energy and inflation Exploring the unknown Achieving the science goals requires technology innovation • All the easy experiments have already been done • Pushing the boundaries of technology enables new experiments 4 8/7/2020 Nigel Lockyer | 53rd Fermilab Users (Virtual Meeting) International Engagements • DOE – Fermilab led efforts in securing in-kind contributions with legally binding agreements for PIP-II, LBNF/DUNE, SBN – Project Annex: Signing of U.S./UK international agreement in January 2020 – At the U.S.- Brazil JCM: Signing of an I-CRADA agreement : UNICAMP and Fermilab and MOU: FAPESP and Fermilab March 2020 – I-CRADA : Fermilab - Wrocław University of Science and Technology (WUST) in January 2020 – I-CRADA : Fermilab - Univ of Bern for DUNE near detector and SBN – November 2019 5 8/7/2020 Nigel Lockyer | 53rd Fermilab Users (Virtual Meeting) International Engagements – Ambassador of France • H.E.
    [Show full text]
  • Information to Users
    INFORMATION TO USERS This manuscript has been reproduced from the microfilm master. UMI films the text directly from the original or copy submitted. Thus, some thesis and dissertation copies are in typewriter face, while others may be from any type of computer printer. The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleedthrough, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction. In the unlikely event that the author did not send UMI a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Oversize materials (e.g., maps, drawings, charts) are reproduced by sectioning the original, beginning at the upper left-hand comer and continuing from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps. Photographs included in the original manuscript have been reproduced xerographically in this copy. Higher quality 6" x 9” black and white photographic prints are available for any photographs or illustrations appearing in this copy for an additional charge. Contact UMI directly to order. ProQuest Information and Learning 300 North Zeeb Road. Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 USA 800-521-0600 UMI LUNATIC ON A MOUNTAIN: FRITZ ZWICKY AND THE EARLY HISTORY OF DARK MATTER by Tricia Close Submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science Saint Mary’s University Halifax,
    [Show full text]
  • Report Idea 1
    annual report 2005 Innovation and the Integrity of Science The American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) is the world’s largest general scientific society, and publisher of the journal, Science (www.sciencemag.org). AAAS was founded in 1848, and serves 262 affiliated societies and academies of science, reaching 10 million individuals. Science has the largest paid circulation of any peer-reviewed general science journal in the world, with an estimated total readership of 1 million. The non-profit AAAS (www.aaas.org) is open to all and fulfills its mission to “advance science and serve society” through initiatives in science policy; international programs; science education; and more. For the latest research news, log onto EurekAlert!, www.eurekalert.org, the premier science-news Web site, a service of AAAS. Table of Contents 2 Welcome Letter 4 Evolution — 2005 Chronology 6 Science Policy and Security 8 International Impacts 10 Science Education and Careers 12 Science Breakthroughs 14 Engaging the Public 16 AAAS Awards 20 Golden Fund Update 22 AAAS Fellows 26 Acknowledgement of Contributors 32 Financial Summary for 2005 33 AAAS Board of Directors, Officers and Information 1 Year in Review: 2005 WELCOME FROM THE CHAIR, SHIRLEY ANN JACKSON, AND THE CEO, ALAN I. LESHNER In a global economy, our prosperity, safety, and overall well-being depend more than ever upon our capacity for innovation. Geopolitical tensions, exacerbated by an uncertain energy future, underscore the need to step up the pace of fundamental scientific discovery. In the United States, unfortunately, a quiet crisis confronts us as scientists and engineers are retiring in record numbers and too few students enter the pipeline.
    [Show full text]