Astronomers' Universe ISBN 978-3-030-10379-8 ISBN 978-3-030-10380-4 (Ebook)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Astronomers' Universe ISBN 978-3-030-10379-8 ISBN 978-3-030-10380-4 (Ebook) Astronomers’ Universe Series editor Martin Beech, Campion College, The University of Regina, Regina, Saskatchewan, Canada More information about this series at http://www.springer.com/series/6960 Steven J. Dick Classifying the Cosmos How We Can Make Sense of the Celestial Landscape Steven J. Dick Ashburn, VA, USA ISSN 1614-659X ISSN 2197-6651 (electronic) Astronomers' Universe ISBN 978-3-030-10379-8 ISBN 978-3-030-10380-4 (eBook) https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-10380-4 Library of Congress Control Number: 2019930431 © Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019 This work is subject to copyright. All rights are reserved by the Publisher, whether the whole or part of the material is concerned, specifically the rights of translation, reprinting, reuse of illustrations, recitation, broadcasting, reproduction on microfilms or in any other physical way, and transmission or information storage and retrieval, electronic adaptation, computer software, or by similar or dissimilar methodology now known or hereafter developed. The use of general descriptive names, registered names, trademarks, service marks, etc. in this publication does not imply, even in the absence of a specific statement, that such names are exempt from the relevant protective laws and regulations and therefore free for general use. The publisher, the authors, and the editors are safe to assume that the advice and information in this book are believed to be true and accurate at the date of publication. Neither the publisher nor the authors or the editors give a warranty, express or implied, with respect to the material contained herein or for any errors or omissions that may have been made. The publisher remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. Cover caption: © Mark Garlick / Science Photo Library This Springer imprint is published by the registered company Springer Nature Switzerland AG The registered company address is: Gewerbestrasse 11, 6330 Cham, Switzerland What’s so amazing That keeps us stargazing? And what do we think we might see? – Kermit the Frog, “Rainbow Connection” To the Past James E. Dick & Elizabeth Grieshaber Dick The Present Terry, Gregory & Jenna, Anthony & Elizabeth, Mary Lou, Karen, Chris & Mark And the Future Adeline, Benjamin, John, James, Daniel The Hubble Ultra Deep Field, released in 2014 with its visible, near-infrared, and ultraviolet components, contains more than 10,000 galaxies stretching back in time almost to the Big Bang. It covers an area of the Southern Hemisphere sky equivalent to looking through a straw. How to understand these objects, and indeed all the objects in the universe? Classification is always the first step. Credit: NASA, ESA, H. Teplitz and M. Rafelski (IPAC/Caltech), A. Koekemoer (STScI), R. Windhorst (Arizona State University), and Z. Levay (STScI) Acknowledgments The development of the Three Kingdom system for astronomy has had a long gestation. I began work on the idea shortly after finishing The Biological Universe in 1995, the kind of release from a 15-year project that urges the mind in new directions. I had attended numerous meetings of the American Astronomical Soci- ety and the International Astronomical Union (IAU), where a zoo of increasingly exotic astronomical objects was revealed and elab- orated. What eventually became what I dub here the “3K” system was my personal search for order amidst this profusion of objects. At the same time, the “Three Domain” system of biologist Carl Woese was much in the news, uprooting previously cherished ideas in biological classification. Despite criticism of his system, biolo- gists seemed to have a better handle on their objects of study than astronomers, and seemed to take comprehensive classification systems more seriously than their astronomical counterparts, who have historically had only piecemeal systems. The heated contro- versy over the planetary status of Pluto, in which I participated and voted on at the IAU in Prague in summer 2006, highlighted this deficiency in astronomy, as does the continual discovery of new exoplanets and other exotic objects. I first broached the subject of a comprehensive classifica- tion system for astronomy publicly in broad outline in my Dibner Library Lecture, “Extraterrestrial Life and Our World View at the Turn of the Millennium,” delivered at the Smithsonian Institu- tion on May 2, 2000. It was elaborated in more detail in my LeRoy E. Doggett Prize Lecture at the winter meeting of the American Astronomical Society in Washington, D.C. in January 2006. And it was discussed in one chapter of my book Discovery and Classifica- xii Acknowledgments tion in Astronomy: Controversy and Consensus (Cambridge Uni- versity Press, 2013). My duties as NASA Chief Historian prevented the further development and publication of the system until now, and I am thankful to Springer for publishing it with so many illus- trations. Particular thanks to Maury Solomon, Hannah Kaufman, and Sharmila Sasikumar at Springer. I am indebted to the fabulous and essential Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory/NASA Astrophysics Data System (http://adswww.harvard.edu/) as the major source for much of the literature used and cited in the notes. The reader can access most of that literature by accessing that web site and entering author and date. I have also found very useful the following compilations and commentaries: Marcia Bartusiak, ed., Archives of the Universe: A Treasury of Astronomy’s Historic Works of Discovery (New York: Pantheon Books, 2004); Kenneth Lang and Owen Gingerich, eds., A Source Book in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 1900-1975, (Cam- bridge, MA.: Harvard University Press, 1979); and Helmut Abt, ed., American Astronomical Society Centennial Issue: Selected Fundamental Papers Published This Century in the Astronomi- cal Journal and the Astrophysical Journal, Astrophysical Journal, 525 (1999). The Journal for the History of Astronomy, edited for 40 years by Michael Hoskin at Churchill Cambridge, College, and now by James Evans, is a vast treasure trove of information that I have also used extensively, as is the Journal of Astronomical His- tory and Heritage, edited by Wayne Orchiston. Both are available via ADS. For the latest astronomy news I have found very use- ful the Nova research highlights of the American Astronomical Society at https://aasnova.org, as well as the websites of particular observatories such as Hubble, Spitzer, Chandra and ground-­based observatories such as ALMA and the European Southern Observa- tory. The Mikulski Archive for Space Telescopes (https://archive. stsci.edu/), located at the Space Telescope Science Institute, is another great resource. In addition to primary and secondary literature, I have not hesitated to make cautious use of press releases, which often con- tain revealing quotations from discoverers not present in their technical publications. I have occasionally made use of newspa- per reports, which often pinpoint the date the discovery was made public, although, as I am at pains to say in my previous book, “dis- covery” itself is an extended process. For illustrations, and much more, my debt to NASA and worldwide astronomical observato- Acknowledgments xiii ries will be evident. NASA’s Planetary Data System (https://pds. nasa.gov/) is an almost inexhaustible source of imagery. My thanks as well to the unparalleled astronomy treasures of the US Naval Observatory in Washington, D.C, and its ever-help- ful Librarians over a period of many years: Brenda Corbin, Sally Bosken, and Gregory Shelton. My employment as an astronomer and historian there, only steps from its world-class library, kept me immersed in the astronomical literature for almost a quar- ter century. Last but not least, my thanks to those astronomers and historians who read all or part of the manuscript. Though ­inevitably opinions will vary on some of the classifications in this volume, any final faults are my own. My hope is that the book is useful to those trying to make sense of the ever-changing celestial landscape, and that it spurs provocative discussion about discov- ery, interpretation and classification. This book may be considered a companion to my book Dis- covery and Classification in Astronomy, published by Cambridge University Press in 2013, where the Three Kingdom system was first published in full as an Appendix and briefly discussed in a section of Chapter 8. I have on occasion used passages from that volume in this book when appropriate for describing the history of discovery of particular objects, and have given the proper cita- tion for readers who may wish to consult the earlier book for the broader context. Ashburn, VA Steven J. Dick January, 2019 Contents Introduction to Astronomy’s Three Kingdoms ���������������������� xix Part I The Kingdom of the Planets 1. The Protoplanetary Family ������������������������������������������������� 7 Class P 1: Protoplanetary Disk ������������������������������������������� 7 2. The Planet Family ��������������������������������������������������������������� 13 Class P 2: Terrestrial (Rocky) ��������������������������������������������� 13 Class P 3: Gas Giant ����������������������������������������������������������� 21 Class P 4: Ice Giant ������������������������������������������������������������� 28 Class P 5: Pulsar Planet ������������������������������������������������������� 32 3. The Circumplanetary Family ��������������������������������������������� 37 Class P 6: Satellite ���������������������������������������������������������������
Recommended publications
  • Exploring Pulsars
    High-energy astrophysics Explore the PUL SAR menagerie Astronomers are discovering many strange properties of compact stellar objects called pulsars. Here’s how they fit together. by Victoria M. Kaspi f you browse through an astronomy book published 25 years ago, you’d likely assume that astronomers understood extremely dense objects called neutron stars fairly well. The spectacular Crab Nebula’s central body has been a “poster child” for these objects for years. This specific neutron star is a pulsar that I rotates roughly 30 times per second, emitting regular appar- ent pulsations in Earth’s direction through a sort of “light- house” effect as the star rotates. While these textbook descriptions aren’t incorrect, research over roughly the past decade has shown that the picture they portray is fundamentally incomplete. Astrono- mers know that the simple scenario where neutron stars are all born “Crab-like” is not true. Experts in the field could not have imagined the variety of neutron stars they’ve recently observed. We’ve found that bizarre objects repre- sent a significant fraction of the neutron star population. With names like magnetars, anomalous X-ray pulsars, soft gamma repeaters, rotating radio transients, and compact Long the pulsar poster child, central objects, these bodies bear properties radically differ- the Crab Nebula’s central object is a fast-spinning neutron star ent from those of the Crab pulsar. Just how large a fraction that emits jets of radiation at its they represent is still hotly debated, but it’s at least 10 per- magnetic axis. Astronomers cent and maybe even the majority.
    [Show full text]
  • 2016-2017 Year Book Www
    1 2016-2017 YEAR BOOK WWW. C A R N E G I E S C I E N C E . E D U Department of Embryology 3520 San Martin Dr. / Baltimore, MD 21218 410.246.3001 Geophysical Laboratory 5251 Broad Branch Rd., N.W. / Washington, DC 20015-1305 202.478.8900 Department of Global Ecology 260 Panama St. / Stanford, CA 94305-4101 650.462.1047 The Carnegie Observatories 813 Santa Barbara St. / Pasadena, CA 91101-1292 626.577.1122 Las Campanas Observatory Casilla 601 / La Serena, Chile Department of Plant Biology 260 Panama St. / Stanford, CA 94305-4101 650.325.1521 Department of Terrestrial Magnetism 5241 Broad Branch Rd., N.W. / Washington, DC 20015-1305 202.478.8820 Office of Administration 1530 P St., N.W. / Washington, DC 20005-1910 202.387.6400 2 0 1 6 - 2 0 1 7 Y E A R B O O K The President’s Report July 1, 2016 - June 30, 2017 C A R N E G I E I N S T I T U T I O N F O R S C I E N C E Former Presidents Daniel C. Gilman, 1902–1904 Robert S. Woodward, 1904–1920 John C. Merriam, 1921–1938 Vannevar Bush, 1939–1955 Caryl P. Haskins, 1956–1971 Philip H. Abelson, 1971–1978 James D. Ebert, 1978–1987 Edward E. David, Jr. (Acting President, 1987–1988) Maxine F. Singer, 1988–2002 Michael E. Gellert (Acting President, Jan.–April 2003) Richard A. Meserve, 2003–2014 Former Trustees Philip H. Abelson, 1978–2004 Patrick E.
    [Show full text]
  • Ira Sprague Bowen Papers, 1940-1973
    http://oac.cdlib.org/findaid/ark:/13030/tf2p300278 No online items Inventory of the Ira Sprague Bowen Papers, 1940-1973 Processed by Ronald S. Brashear; machine-readable finding aid created by Gabriela A. Montoya Manuscripts Department The Huntington Library 1151 Oxford Road San Marino, California 91108 Phone: (626) 405-2203 Fax: (626) 449-5720 Email: [email protected] URL: http://www.huntington.org/huntingtonlibrary.aspx?id=554 © 1998 The Huntington Library. All rights reserved. Observatories of the Carnegie Institution of Washington Collection Inventory of the Ira Sprague 1 Bowen Papers, 1940-1973 Observatories of the Carnegie Institution of Washington Collection Inventory of the Ira Sprague Bowen Paper, 1940-1973 The Huntington Library San Marino, California Contact Information Manuscripts Department The Huntington Library 1151 Oxford Road San Marino, California 91108 Phone: (626) 405-2203 Fax: (626) 449-5720 Email: [email protected] URL: http://www.huntington.org/huntingtonlibrary.aspx?id=554 Processed by: Ronald S. Brashear Encoded by: Gabriela A. Montoya © 1998 The Huntington Library. All rights reserved. Descriptive Summary Title: Ira Sprague Bowen Papers, Date (inclusive): 1940-1973 Creator: Bowen, Ira Sprague Extent: Approximately 29,000 pieces in 88 boxes Repository: The Huntington Library San Marino, California 91108 Language: English. Provenance Placed on permanent deposit in the Huntington Library by the Observatories of the Carnegie Institution of Washington Collection. This was done in 1989 as part of a letter of agreement (dated November 5, 1987) between the Huntington and the Carnegie Observatories. The papers have yet to be officially accessioned. Cataloging of the papers was completed in 1989 prior to their transfer to the Huntington.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 3: Familiarizing Yourself with the Night Sky
    Chapter 3: Familiarizing Yourself With the Night Sky Introduction People of ancient cultures viewed the sky as the inaccessible home of the gods. They observed the daily motion of the stars, and grouped them into patterns and images. They assigned stories to the stars, relating to themselves and their gods. They believed that human events and cycles were part of larger cosmic events and cycles. The night sky was part of the cycle. The steady progression of star patterns across the sky was related to the ebb and flow of the seasons, the cyclical migration of herds and hibernation of bears, the correct times to plant or harvest crops. Everywhere on Earth people watched and recorded this orderly and majestic celestial procession with writings and paintings, rock art, and rock and stone monuments or alignments. When the Great Pyramid in Egypt was constructed around 2650 BC, two shafts were built into it at an angle, running from the outside into the interior of the pyramid. The shafts coincide with the North-South passage of two stars important to the Egyptians: Thuban, the star closest to the North Pole at that time, and one of the stars of Orion’s belt. Orion was The Ishango Bone, thought to be a 20,000 year old associated with Osiris, one of the Egyptian gods of the lunar calendar underworld. The Bighorn Medicine Wheel in Wyoming, built by Plains Indians, consists of rocks in the shape of a large circle, with lines radiating from a central hub like the spokes of a bicycle wheel.
    [Show full text]
  • Messier Objects
    Messier Objects From the Stocker Astroscience Center at Florida International University Miami Florida The Messier Project Main contributors: • Daniel Puentes • Steven Revesz • Bobby Martinez Charles Messier • Gabriel Salazar • Riya Gandhi • Dr. James Webb – Director, Stocker Astroscience center • All images reduced and combined using MIRA image processing software. (Mirametrics) What are Messier Objects? • Messier objects are a list of astronomical sources compiled by Charles Messier, an 18th and early 19th century astronomer. He created a list of distracting objects to avoid while comet hunting. This list now contains over 110 objects, many of which are the most famous astronomical bodies known. The list contains planetary nebula, star clusters, and other galaxies. - Bobby Martinez The Telescope The telescope used to take these images is an Astronomical Consultants and Equipment (ACE) 24- inch (0.61-meter) Ritchey-Chretien reflecting telescope. It has a focal ratio of F6.2 and is supported on a structure independent of the building that houses it. It is equipped with a Finger Lakes 1kx1k CCD camera cooled to -30o C at the Cassegrain focus. It is equipped with dual filter wheels, the first containing UBVRI scientific filters and the second RGBL color filters. Messier 1 Found 6,500 light years away in the constellation of Taurus, the Crab Nebula (known as M1) is a supernova remnant. The original supernova that formed the crab nebula was observed by Chinese, Japanese and Arab astronomers in 1054 AD as an incredibly bright “Guest star” which was visible for over twenty-two months. The supernova that produced the Crab Nebula is thought to have been an evolved star roughly ten times more massive than the Sun.
    [Show full text]
  • Volume LX I, I 9
    CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE Of TECHNOLOGY E N GI N E E Volume LX I, N II1llber 3, I 9 9 8 IN THIS ISSUE • Prosecuting Science Simulating Molecules Observing Anniversaries London Bridge? The Manhattan skyline? No, it's an oil refinery. figuring out how to squeeze more gasoline rrom a barrel or crude is just one project a group or theoretical chemists at Caltech have taken on in a series or academic­ industrial collaborations. for more on this partner­ sh ip, see the story on page 20. Photo courtesy or Chevron Corporation. \ California Inst i tute of Technology 2 Random Wa l k 10 Scie ntific Fraud and Misconduct in American Po litica l Cu lture : Reflections on the Baltimore Case - by Dan ie l J. Kevles Excessive zeal on the part of legislators and the media hyped public suspicion of scientists' behavior. 20 " H ave Method , Wi ll T rave l" - by Douglas L. Smi t h Computational chemistry ventures into the Real World as Cal tech theorists tackle industrial problems. 30 Tw o A s tronomical Anniv ers aries : Palomar at 50 Still going strong , the hale and hearty Hale Telescope hits the half century mark. 36 ... and OVRO at 40 Radio astronomers parry, too. On t he Cover: The six IO.4·meter antennas (one 42 Boo ks - The Earth in Tf{rmoil by Kerr y Si eh a n d S i mon LeVay is hidden behind the others here) of the Owe ns 43 Faculty Fil e Valley Radio Observat ory millimeter· wave array can receive signals from up t o Engineering & Science (ISSN 0013-7812) is published Warren G.
    [Show full text]
  • A Multimessenger View of Galaxies and Quasars from Now to Mid-Century M
    A multimessenger view of galaxies and quasars from now to mid-century M. D’Onofrio 1;∗, P. Marziani 2;∗ 1 Department of Physics & Astronomy, University of Padova, Padova, Italia 2 National Institute for Astrophysics (INAF), Padua Astronomical Observatory, Italy Correspondence*: Mauro D’Onofrio [email protected] ABSTRACT In the next 30 years, a new generation of space and ground-based telescopes will permit to obtain multi-frequency observations of faint sources and, for the first time in human history, to achieve a deep, almost synoptical monitoring of the whole sky. Gravitational wave observatories will detect a Universe of unseen black holes in the merging process over a broad spectrum of mass. Computing facilities will permit new high-resolution simulations with a deeper physical analysis of the main phenomena occurring at different scales. Given these development lines, we first sketch a panorama of the main instrumental developments expected in the next thirty years, dealing not only with electromagnetic radiation, but also from a multi-messenger perspective that includes gravitational waves, neutrinos, and cosmic rays. We then present how the new instrumentation will make it possible to foster advances in our present understanding of galaxies and quasars. We focus on selected scientific themes that are hotly debated today, in some cases advancing conjectures on the solution of major problems that may become solved in the next 30 years. Keywords: galaxy evolution – quasars – cosmology – supermassive black holes – black hole physics 1 INTRODUCTION: TOWARD MULTIMESSENGER ASTRONOMY The development of astronomy in the second half of the XXth century followed two major lines of improvement: the increase in light gathering power (i.e., the ability to detect fainter objects), and the extension of the frequency domain in the electromagnetic spectrum beyond the traditional optical domain.
    [Show full text]
  • An Overview of New Worlds, New Horizons in Astronomy and Astrophysics About the National Academies
    2020 VISION An Overview of New Worlds, New Horizons in Astronomy and Astrophysics About the National Academies The National Academies—comprising the National Academy of Sciences, the National Academy of Engineering, the Institute of Medicine, and the National Research Council—work together to enlist the nation’s top scientists, engineers, health professionals, and other experts to study specific issues in science, technology, and medicine that underlie many questions of national importance. The results of their deliberations have inspired some of the nation’s most significant and lasting efforts to improve the health, education, and welfare of the United States and have provided independent advice on issues that affect people’s lives worldwide. To learn more about the Academies’ activities, check the website at www.nationalacademies.org. Copyright 2011 by the National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America This study was supported by Contract NNX08AN97G between the National Academy of Sciences and the National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Contract AST-0743899 between the National Academy of Sciences and the National Science Foundation, and Contract DE-FG02-08ER41542 between the National Academy of Sciences and the U.S. Department of Energy. Support for this study was also provided by the Vesto Slipher Fund. Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the agencies that provided support for the project. 2020 VISION An Overview of New Worlds, New Horizons in Astronomy and Astrophysics Committee for a Decadal Survey of Astronomy and Astrophysics ROGER D.
    [Show full text]
  • Nfap Policy Brief » O C T O B E R 2017
    NATIONAL FOUNDATION FOR AMERICAN POLICY NFAP POLICY BRIEF» O CTOBER 2017 IMMIGRANTS AND NOBEL PRIZES : 1901- 2017 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Immigrants have been awarded 39 percent, or 33 of 85, of the Nobel Prizes won by Americans in Chemistry, Medicine and Physics since 2000. In 2017, the sole American winner of the Nobel Prize in Chemistry was an immigrant, Joachim Frank, a Columbia University professor born in Germany. Immigrant Reiner Weiss, who was born in Germany and came to the United States as a teenager, was awarded the 2017 Nobel Prize in Physics, sharing it with two other Americans, Kip S. Thorne and Barry C. Barish. In 2016, all 6 American winners of the Nobel Prize in economics and scientific fields were immigrants. These achievements by immigrants point to the gains to America of welcoming talent from across the globe. It does not mean America should welcome only Nobel Prize winners. Such a policy would be impossible to implement, since most immigrant Nobel Prize winners enter the United States many years before being awarded this honor. Most people immigrate to another country in their 20s, particularly employment-based immigrants, who either study in America or come here to work shortly after obtaining a degree abroad. The average of age of Nobel Prize winners at the time of the award is 59.5 years, according to economist Mark J. Perry.1 Table 1 Immigrant Nobel Prize Winners in Chemistry, Medicine and Physics Since 2000 Immigrant Nobel Winners Since 2000 33 of 85 American winners have been immigrants Percentage of Immigrant Winners Since 2000 39% Source: Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences, National Foundation for American Policy, George Mason University Institute for Immigration Research.
    [Show full text]
  • Reconsidering the Identification of M101 Hypernova Remnant
    Reconsidering the Identification of M101 Hypernova Remnant Candidates S. L. Snowden1,2, K. Mukai1,3, and W. Pence4 Code 662, NASA/Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD 20771 and K. D. Kuntz5 Joint Center for Astrophysics, University of Maryland Baltimore County, Baltimore, MD, 21250 ABSTRACT Using a deep Chandra AO-1 observation of the face-on spiral galaxy M101, we examine three of five previously optically-identified X-ray sources which are spatially correlated with optical supernova remnants (MF54, MF57, and MF83). The X-ray fluxes from these objects, if due to diffuse emission from the remnants, are bright enough to require a new class of objects, with the possible attribution by Wang to diffuse emission from hypernova remnants. Of the three, MF83 was considered the most likely candidate for such an object due to its size, nature, and close positional coincidence. However, we find that MF83 is clearly ruled out as a hypernova remnant by both its temporal variability and spectrum. The bright X-ray sources previously associated with MF54 and MF57 are seen by Chandra to be clearly offset from the optical positions of the supernova remnants by several arc seconds, confirming a result suggested by the previous work. MF54 does have a faint X-ray counterpart, however, with a luminosity and temperature consistent with a normal supernova remnant of its size. The most likely classifications of the sources are as X-ray binaries. Although counting statistics are limited, over the 0.3–5.0 keV spectral band the data are well fit by simple absorbed power laws with luminosities in the 1038 − 1039 ergs s−1 range.
    [Show full text]
  • Wind-Blown Bubbles and Hii Regions Around Massive
    RevMexAA (Serie de Conferencias), 30, 64{71 (2007) WIND-BLOWN BUBBLES AND HII REGIONS AROUND MASSIVE STARS S. J. Arthur1 RESUMEN La evoluci´on de las estrellas muy masivas est´a dominada por su p´erdida de masa, aunque las tasas de p´erdida de masa no se conocen con mucha precisi´on, particularmente una vez que la estrella sale de la secuencia principal. Los estudios de las nebulosas de anillo y de las cascarones de HI que rodean a muchas estrellas Wolf-Rayet (WR) y variables azules luminosas (LBV) proporcionan algo de informaci´on acerca de la historia de la p´erdida de masa en las etapas previas. Durante la secuencia principal y la fase WR los vientos estelares hipers´onicos forman burbujas en el medio circunestelar e interestelar. Estas dos fases est´an separadas por una etapa en donde la estrella pierde masa a una tasa muy alta pero a baja velocidad. Por lo tanto, el ambiente presupernova es determinado por la estrella progenitora misma, aun´ hasta distancias de algunas decenas de parsecs de la estrella. En este art´ıculo, se describen las diferentes etapas en la evoluci´on del medio circunestelar alrededar de una estrella de masa 40 M mediante simulaciones num´ericas. ABSTRACT Mass loss dominates the evolution of very massive stars, although the mass loss rates are not known exactly, particularly once the star has left the main sequence. Studies of the ring nebulae and HI shells that surround many Wolf-Rayet (WR) and luminous blue variable (LBV) stars provide some information on the previous mass-loss history.
    [Show full text]
  • A Bibliometric Perspective Survey of Astronomical Object Tracking System
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Library Philosophy and Practice (e-journal) Libraries at University of Nebraska-Lincoln 2-15-2021 A Bibliometric Perspective Survey of Astronomical Object Tracking System Mariyam Ashai Symbiosis Institute of Technology (SIT), Symbiosis International (Deemed University), Pune, India, [email protected] Rhea Gautam Mukherjee Symbiosis Institute of Technology (SIT), Symbiosis International (Deemed University), Pune, India, [email protected] Sanjana Mundharikar Symbiosis Institute of Technology (SIT), Symbiosis International (Deemed University), Pune, India, [email protected] Vinayak Dev Kuanr Symbiosis Institute of Technology (SIT), Symbiosis International (Deemed University), Pune, India, [email protected] Shivali Amit Wagle Symbiosis Institute of Technology (SIT), Symbiosis International (Deemed University), Pune, India, [email protected] See next page for additional authors Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac Part of the Library and Information Science Commons, and the Other Aerospace Engineering Commons Ashai, Mariyam; Mukherjee, Rhea Gautam; Mundharikar, Sanjana; Kuanr, Vinayak Dev; Wagle, Shivali Amit; and R, Harikrishnan, "A Bibliometric Perspective Survey of Astronomical Object Tracking System" (2021). Library Philosophy and Practice (e-journal). 5151. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/5151 Authors Mariyam Ashai, Rhea Gautam Mukherjee, Sanjana Mundharikar,
    [Show full text]