CIO.GAL/99/08 3 July 2008 ENGLISH Only

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

CIO.GAL/99/08 3 July 2008 ENGLISH Only CIO.GAL/99/08 3 July 2008 ENGLISH only Check against delivery STATEMENT BY THE OSCE CHAIRMAN-IN-OFFICE, MINISTER FOR FOREIGN AFFAIRS OF FINLAND, DR. ALEXANDER STUBB 17th Annual Session of the OSCE Parliamentary Assembly Astana, Kazakhstan 2 July 2008 Mr President, Mr Secretary General Distinguished Members of the OSCE Parliamentary Assembly, I wish to express my appreciation to the Government of Kazakhstan, and in particular to His Excellency Nursultan Nazarbayev, President of the Republic of Kazakhstan, His Excellency Kassim- Jomart Tokaev, Chairman of the Senate and His Excellency Aslan Musin, Chairman of the Mazhilis, for inviting the 17th Annual Session of the OSCE Parliamentary Assembly to be held in Astana. The presence of the OSCE parliamentarians here today confirms the important role of Kazakhstan in the OSCE. It underscores also the commitment of this country, its Government and its society, to the principles and values that animate the work of our Organization. One of these values is a deep commitment to participatory democracy. Nowhere is this commitment more evident than in the OSCE parliamentary dimension. The experience and insight the parliamentarians offer to the work of the Organisation is vital. Mr President, Distinguished Parliamentarians, Like every organisation, the OSCE needs a clear purpose and precise goals. I would like to share with you my "mission statement" for the OSCE, along with some reflections on the current state of affairs. My mission statement for the OSCE is threefold. The OSCE is needed - to solve conflicts - to support transition processes - to bolster co-operative security across the Euro-Atlantic region. * * * The unresolved conflicts in the OSCE area have become serious obstacles to human security, democratisation and economic development in their neighbourhoods. The international community, the OSCE especially, must invest more in seeking their settlement. I believe that the OSCE should be in the business of resolving conflicts and not only managing them. We are making some progress in Transnistria, Moldova. The parties have re-engaged in working towards concrete confidence-building measures. I am pleased with the results of the recent meeting in Helsinki of the mediators and observers. In the near future, I hope that we will be able to convince the parties to join the negotiations. This is the only way towards the solution. In South Caucasus, we have not registered similar progress. Instead, tensions have been rising in all of the conflict zones. I am deeply concerned about the situation and have appealed for calm and restraint. The Finnish Chairmanship has worked tirelessly to build bridges of communication and trust between the parties, and we will continue to do so. The OSCE should be used as a platform for dialogue and crisis management also in difficult times. I am convinced that one of the best ways to defuse tensions is to open a long-term perspective for the settlement of these conflicts. This is why the Finnish Chairmanship has expressed its readiness to explore the possibility of new negotiating mechanisms for the South Ossetian conflict in Georgia. Any new negotiating format needs to build on and add value to the existing mechanism and be acceptable to all parties. Rest assured that I, and my Special Envoy, will remain sharply focussed on these issues. Mr President, Distinguished Parliamentarians, The OSCE is also in the business of supporting transition in its participating States. The commitment that all OSCE participating States have taken to respect human rights and fundamental freedoms 2 includes the pledge to build political systems on democratic principles. These commitments form the bedrock of the OSCE’s work. OSCE Institutions and Field Operations are the main channels through which the Organisation lends its support to participating States and works with them in these directions. Fostering reform requires a partnership between the participating State in question and the OSCE. Nowhere is this partnership more needed than here in the Central Asian countries. All of my interlocutors in this region have expressed deep knowledge of and a keen interest in the OSCE during our talks. The formidable challenges faced by the Central Asian participating States cut across all the OSCE dimensions. The progress attained has been impressive in many areas. But, as all of my interlocutors noted, much work remains ahead. The OSCE stands ready as ever to support States and societies across the board, from enhancing participatory democracy to ensuring better border security. Building stability, prosperity and democracy in this region is vitally important for the whole OSCE area. The contribution of the Central Asian participating States towards building a democratic and stable Afghanistan is of crucial importance. I will continue to push for an intensified OSCE engagement with Afghanistan on the basis Madrid Ministerial Council decision and hope we can start significant OSCE projects in a near future. Mr President, Distinguished Parliamentarians, The OSCE is a standard bearer of co-operative security from Vancouver to Vladivostok: we do things together in order to increase everybody's security, and, in this, we act with the participating States, civil society actors and other international organisations. Our approach must remain inclusive and our concept of security dynamic. Change is written in the OSCE's genetic code, and it is a main feature of our co-operative approach. International realities in Europe have changed dramatically since 1975 -- since when the political undertaking of 35 countries has been transformed into the international organisation of 56 participating States. We have not reached the “end of the history”, but I have no doubt that together we can meet the challenges ahead. 3 Recently, Russian President Medvedev put forward the idea of a new security treaty for Euro-Atlantic area. Any ideas that open new avenues for co-operative security are worth exploring. I look forward to a dialogue on European security between all parties concerned. In the face of change, the core strengths of the OSCE are of lasting value. The emphasis on co- operative security and its normative foundations of democracy, human rights and the rule of law will maintain their relevance also into the future. Mr President, Distinguished Parliamentarians, The Quintet co-operation between the five successive OSCE Chairmanships of Spain, Finland, Greece, Kazakhstan and Lithuania, is a key tool to promote much-needed continuity in OSCE action. I had the pleasure of hosting the first informal meeting of the Quintet ministers in Helsinki on 1 and 2 June with the participation of President Lennmarker. I was pleased that my colleague, Foreign Minister Tazhin of Kazakhstan, brought his active contribution to the meeting. The OSCE's Parliamentary dimension has an important role in the Organisation's overall mission. From my own experience, I know that parliamentarians can be an invaluable source of stimulus for governmental action. I hope you join me in strengthening the OSCE's ability to deliver. I would like to thank the Parliamentary Assembly - and President Lennmarker - for its good co- operation with the Finnish Chairmanship. On my part, I pledge to continue this co-operation with the Parliamentary Assembly and its new President. 4.
Recommended publications
  • The Formal Political System in Azerbaijan and Kazakhstan
    Forschungsstelle Osteuropa Bremen Arbeitspapiere und Materialien No. 107 – March 2010 The Formal Political System in Azerbaijan and Kazakhstan. A Background Study By Andreas Heinrich Forschungsstelle Osteuropa an der Universität Bremen Klagenfurter Straße 3, 28359 Bremen, Germany phone +49 421 218-69601, fax +49 421 218-69607 http://www.forschungsstelle.uni-bremen.de Arbeitspapiere und Materialien – Forschungsstelle Osteuropa, Bremen No. 107: Andreas Heinrich The Formal Political System in Azerbaijan and Kazakhstan. A Background Study March 2010 ISSN: 1616-7384 About the author: Andreas Heinrich is a researcher at the Research Centre for East European Studies at the University of Bremen. This working paper has been produced within the research project ‘The Energy Sector and the Political Stability of Regimes in the Caspian Area: A Comparison of Kazakhstan and Azerbaijan’, which is being conducted by the Research Centre for East European Studies at the University of Bremen from April 2009 until April 2011 with financial support from the Volkswagen Foundation. Language editing: Hilary Abuhove Style editing: Judith Janiszewski Layout: Matthias Neumann Cover based on a work of art by Nicholas Bodde Opinions expressed in publications of the Research Centre for East European Studies are solely those of the authors. This publication may not be reprinted or otherwise reproduced—entirely or in part—without prior consent of the Research Centre for East European Studies or without giving credit to author and source. © 2010 by Forschungsstelle Osteuropa, Bremen Forschungsstelle Osteuropa Publikationsreferat Klagenfurter Str. 3 28359 Bremen – Germany phone: +49 421 218-69601 fax: +49 421 218-69607 e-mail: [email protected] internet: http://www.forschungsstelle.uni-bremen.de Contents List of Tables ................................................................................................................................5 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Sources of Political Cleavage and Conflict in the Post-Soviet Period Barbara Junisbai a a Kennan Institute
    This article was downloaded by: [Junisbai, Barbara] On: 6 February 2010 Access details: Access Details: [subscription number 919112814] Publisher Routledge Informa Ltd Registered in England and Wales Registered Number: 1072954 Registered office: Mortimer House, 37- 41 Mortimer Street, London W1T 3JH, UK Europe-Asia Studies Publication details, including instructions for authors and subscription information: http://www.informaworld.com/smpp/title~content=t713414944 A Tale of Two Kazakhstans: Sources of Political Cleavage and Conflict in the Post-Soviet Period Barbara Junisbai a a Kennan Institute, Online publication date: 05 February 2010 To cite this Article Junisbai, Barbara(2010) 'A Tale of Two Kazakhstans: Sources of Political Cleavage and Conflict in the Post-Soviet Period', Europe-Asia Studies, 62: 2, 235 — 269 To link to this Article: DOI: 10.1080/09668130903506813 URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09668130903506813 PLEASE SCROLL DOWN FOR ARTICLE Full terms and conditions of use: http://www.informaworld.com/terms-and-conditions-of-access.pdf This article may be used for research, teaching and private study purposes. Any substantial or systematic reproduction, re-distribution, re-selling, loan or sub-licensing, systematic supply or distribution in any form to anyone is expressly forbidden. The publisher does not give any warranty express or implied or make any representation that the contents will be complete or accurate or up to date. The accuracy of any instructions, formulae and drug doses should be independently verified with primary sources. The publisher shall not be liable for any loss, actions, claims, proceedings, demand or costs or damages whatsoever or howsoever caused arising directly or indirectly in connection with or arising out of the use of this material.
    [Show full text]
  • The Kazakhstan Insider OPEN DIALOG Understanding Social and Poltical Risks of Kazakhstan
    Vol 4, January 2012 The Kazakhstan Insider OPEN DIALOG understanding social and poltical risks of Kazakhstan In this issue : Elections-2012 in Kazakhstan: results and trends 2 Crisis and elections in Kazakhstan 5 centralasiaonline.com From the Editors anuary 15, 2012, elections to the Majilis - the lower chamber of Kazakh JParliament were held in Kazakhstan. As a result, the three political forces - the presidential party "Nur Otan", as well as loyal to the government "Ak Jol" and the Communist People's Party of Kazakhstan have the right to form a new composition of this legislative body. At the same time, according to the OSCE and other international observers, there are several facts that call into question the democratic nature and transparency of the elections. First of all we are talking about the inade - quacy of the election campaign which was held under a state of emergency in Zhanaozen (for more details, please read our previous issue), as well as significant restrictions on the rights of opposition parties which ran in the elections. What are the conclusions drawn by the government of Kazakhstan from these evaluations? How can one explain the new wave of repression to - OPEN DIALOG wards the independent media and civil society representatives which FOUNDATION started immediately after the elections? Please read today's issue in order 3 Maja St. 18/4 to learn about this, as well as about the key facts, evaluations and nature 20-078, Lublin of the election season in 2012. tel . +48 507 739 025 kz .insider @odfoundation.eu Sincerely, Analytical Department, „Open Dialog” Foundation The Kazakhstan Insider - Vol 4 , January 2012 Elections-2012 in Kazakhstan: results and trends The International criticism of the elections to the Majilis was met answered by the Kazakhstan authorities with the exertion of increased pressure on independent media, human rights activists and opposition politicians.
    [Show full text]
  • Azb3thesispdf.Pdf (3.520Mb)
    POST-SOCIALIST DREAMWORLDS: HOUSING BOOM AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT IN KAZAKHSTAN Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of Cornell University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy By Alima Bissenova January 2012 © 2012 Alima Bissenova ii POST-SOCIALIST DREAMWORLDS: HOUSING BOOM AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT IN KAZAKHSTAN Bissenova Alima, Ph.D. Cornell University 2012 This dissertation is based on 26 months, between 2007 and 2010, of official non- continuous ethnographic fieldwork in real estate development in Kazakhstan. During this time, I investigated the institutionalization of new housing “dreamworlds” and new modes of being urban in relation to the practices of government bureaucracy, the practices of the construction industry, and the housing strategies of residents. Even before the commencement of my fieldwork, I had personally socialized with people who moved into and made their homes in the newly built housing complexes of Astana. Drawing on my participant observations, research, and personal engagements with policy-makers, businessmen, and residents, I have written what can be called an anthropology of the boom (an exploration into the socio-economic conditions and forces behind the recent housing boom in Kazakhstan) an anthropology of the emergence of a new material environment, as well as an anthropology of the new social configurations and normative framework arising from the new material conditions. I have also followed some of the institutional developments that took place during the period of my fieldwork and earlier – during the “boom” period of the first decade of the 21st century. These developments chiefly include the planning and building of the new capital, Astana, the housing boom and post-crisis management of the construction, the rise and fall of construction companies, and the trajectories of state housing policies of that period.
    [Show full text]
  • Kazakhstan by Bhavna Dave
    Kazakhstan by Bhavna Dave Capital: Astana Population: 16.6 million GNI/capita, PPP: US$11,250 Source: The data above are drawn from the World Bank’s World Development Indicators 2013. Nations in Transit Ratings and Averaged Scores 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Electoral Process 6.50 6.50 6.50 6.50 6.75 6.75 6.75 6.75 6.75 6.75 Civil Society 5.50 5.50 5.75 5.75 5.50 5.50 5.75 5.75 6.00 6.25 Independent Media 6.50 6.50 6.75 6.75 6.75 6.50 6.75 6.75 6.75 6.75 Governance* 6.25 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a National Democratic Governance n/a 6.50 6.75 6.75 6.75 6.75 6.75 6.75 6.75 6.75 Local Democratic Governance n/a 6.25 6.25 6.25 6.25 6.25 6.25 6.25 6.50 6.50 Judicial Framework and Independence 6.25 6.25 6.25 6.25 6.25 6.00 6.25 6.25 6.50 6.50 Corruption 6.50 6.50 6.50 6.50 6.50 6.50 6.50 6.50 6.50 6.50 Democracy Score 6.25 6.29 6.39 6.39 6.39 6.32 6.43 6.43 6.54 6.57 * Starting with the 2005 edition, Freedom House introduced separate analysis and ratings for national democratic governance and local democratic governance to provide readers with more detailed and nuanced analysis of these two important subjects.
    [Show full text]
  • The Formal Political System in Azerbaijan and Kazakhstan. a Background Study
    www.ssoar.info The formal political system in Azerbaijan and Kazakhstan: a background study Heinrich, Andreas Arbeitspapier / working paper Empfohlene Zitierung / Suggested Citation: Heinrich, A. (2010). The formal political system in Azerbaijan and Kazakhstan: a background study. (Arbeitspapiere und Materialien / Forschungsstelle Osteuropa an der Universität Bremen, 107). Bremen: Forschungsstelle Osteuropa an der Universität Bremen. https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-441356 Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Dieser Text wird unter einer Deposit-Lizenz (Keine This document is made available under Deposit Licence (No Weiterverbreitung - keine Bearbeitung) zur Verfügung gestellt. Redistribution - no modifications). We grant a non-exclusive, non- Gewährt wird ein nicht exklusives, nicht übertragbares, transferable, individual and limited right to using this document. persönliches und beschränktes Recht auf Nutzung dieses This document is solely intended for your personal, non- Dokuments. Dieses Dokument ist ausschließlich für commercial use. All of the copies of this documents must retain den persönlichen, nicht-kommerziellen Gebrauch bestimmt. all copyright information and other information regarding legal Auf sämtlichen Kopien dieses Dokuments müssen alle protection. You are not allowed to alter this document in any Urheberrechtshinweise und sonstigen Hinweise auf gesetzlichen way, to copy it for public or commercial purposes, to exhibit the Schutz beibehalten werden. Sie dürfen dieses Dokument document in public, to perform, distribute or otherwise use the nicht in irgendeiner Weise abändern, noch dürfen Sie document in public. dieses Dokument für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke By using this particular document, you accept the above-stated vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, aufführen, vertreiben oder conditions of use. anderweitig nutzen. Mit der Verwendung dieses Dokuments erkennen Sie die Nutzungsbedingungen an.
    [Show full text]
  • Cooperation Review
    Cooperation Review Since China and Kazakhstan established diplomatic construction of the Atasu-Alashankou crude oil pipeline relations in 1992, Nursultan Nazarbayev, President section with KazMunaiGas. During his visit, President of Kazakhstan, has visited China many times. Many Nazarbayev also attended the launch ceremony of the Chinese state leaders, such as Jiang Zemin, Li Peng, Chinese version of his book The Critical Decade, whose Zhu Rongji, Hu Jintao and Wen Jiabao, have also publication was sponsored by CNPC. paid visits to Kazakhstan. The important documents In 2005, China and Kazakhstan established a strategic signed by the two countries, the Sino-Kazakh Good- partnership, which further strengthened their bilateral Neighborly Treaty of Friendship and Cooperation, the ties. The two countries also cooperate in multilateral Sino-Kazakh Cooperation Strategy for the 21st Century bodies such as the United Nations, the Shanghai and the Sino-Kazakh Economic Cooperation Blueprint, Cooperation Organization and the Conference on have laid a solid foundation for the two countries’ economic, trade, energy, technological, cultural and educational cooperation. In 1997, China and Kazakhstan signed an agreement on cooperation. In addition, China National Petroleum Corporation signed the Development and Pipeline Construction with the Ministry of Energy and Mineral Resources of Kazakhstan. In May 2004, Kazakh President Nursultan Nazarbayev paid a state visit to China, during which the governments of the two countries signed an agreement on establishing a Sino-Kazakh cooperation committee and a framework agreement on comprehensive oil and gas cooperation. CNPC also signed an agreement on the 5 CNPC in Kazakhstan Asia, and continue to expand their cooperation in sectors such as the economy, trade, energy, technology, culture and education.
    [Show full text]
  • UC Berkeley Electronic Theses and Dissertations
    UC Berkeley UC Berkeley Electronic Theses and Dissertations Title From well to welfare: social spending in mineral-rich post-Soviet states Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/2m23n81t Author McCullaugh, Marcy Elisabeth Publication Date 2013 Peer reviewed|Thesis/dissertation eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California From Well to Welfare: Social Spending in Mineral-Rich Post-Soviet States By Marcy Elisabeth McCullaugh A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Political Science in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in Charge: Professor M. Steven Fish, Chair Professor Steven Vogel Professor Jason Wittenberg Professor Michael Watts Fall 2013 Copyright 2013 by Marcy Elisabeth McCullaugh All rights reserved. Abstract From Well to Welfare: Social Spending in Mineral-Rich Post-Soviet States By Marcy Elisabeth McCullaugh Doctor of Philosophy in Political Science University of California, Berkeley Professor M. Steven Fish, Chair Why do some autocrats redistribute resource rents through high welfare spending, while others do not? Conventional wisdom suggests that authoritarian leaders unconstrained by institutions and with unlimited access to resource wealth would siphon off these funds for themselves and rent-seeking elites at the expense of delivering goods to citizens. Yet, welfare spending levels among the world’s petroleum-rich authoritarian and hybrid regimes indicate that some rulers are more inclined than others to “share the loot” with the larger citizenry. This dissertation provides a theory of redistributive social spending in mineral-rich authoritarian regimes, using the cases of Russia, Kazakhstan and Azerbaijan. I analyze health, education and social security spending in each country from 2000-present, leveraging variation across cases as well as within each case over time.
    [Show full text]
  • Market Reform Regimes, Elite Defections, and Political Opposition in the Post-Soviet States: Evidence from Belarus, Kazakhstan, and Kyrgyzstan
    MARKET REFORM REGIMES, ELITE DEFECTIONS, AND POLITICAL OPPOSITION IN THE POST-SOVIET STATES: EVIDENCE FROM BELARUS, KAZAKHSTAN, AND KYRGYZSTAN Barbara Junisbai Submitted to the faculty of the University Graduate School in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of Political Science, Indiana University December 2009 UMI Number: 3390277 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. UMI 3390277 Copyright 2010 by ProQuest LLC. All rights reserved. This edition of the work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. ProQuest LLC 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, MI 48106-1346 Accepted by the Graduate Faculty, Indiana University, in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Doctoral Committee ____________________________________ Jack Bielasiak, Ph.D. ____________________________________ Regina Smyth, Ph.D. ____________________________________ Henry Hale, Ph.D. ____________________________________ William Fierman, Ph.D. December 1, 2009 ii © 2009 Barbara Junisbai ALL RIGHTS RESERVED iii DEDICATION In loving memory of Cecilia Iniguez (1973-2006), who shared girlhood secrets and dreams and knew things about me that I have long since forgotten. I miss you. iv ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would like first to express my sincere gratitude to the members of my dissertation committee, who challenged me to find the larger implications of a research agenda that was at first narrowly cast, who with critical and appreciative eyes read through drafts of manuscripts that grew out of my field research, and who encouraged me to apply widely for fellowships and present my work at conferences and workshops.
    [Show full text]
  • 0721D8e9401c404a9bf7b4b2b0
    About This Report This is the first time that China National Petroleum Corporation (CNPC) publishes its sustainability report in Kazakhstan. Company: China National Petroleum Corporation Time span: 1997-2008 Reporting principles: Objective, standard, credible and open. Report content: CNPC's achievements in the sustainable economic, environmental and social development in Kazakhstan. Information source: Information and statistics provided by CNPC and its subsidiaries in Kazakhstan, after being duly reviewed by the departments in charge. Abbreviations: China National Petroleum Corporation is also called “CNPC”, “the company”, “we” and “us” in this report. References: The Sustainability Reporting Guidelines 2006 by Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) and Oil and Gas Industry Guidance on Voluntary Sustainability Reporting. Languages: Chinese, Kazakh, Russian and English. The Chinese edition shall prevail in case of any discrepancy. Please feel free to contact us or visit our website to download this report. China National Petroleum Corporation (CNPC) is one of the largest oil and gas producers and suppliers in China with businesses covering a broad spectrum of oil and gas exploration and production, oilfield services, petroleum engineering construction, petroleum equipment manufacturing, financial service, and new energy development. At present, the company has oil and gas investment in 29 countries and provides oilfield service in 44 countries and regions across the world. CNPC was ranked 25th in Fortune magazine’s top 500 enterprises and
    [Show full text]
  • Wojciech Ostrowski Phd Thesis
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egime maintenance in post-Soviet Kazakhstan: the case of the regime and oil industry relationship (1991-2005) Wojciech Ostrowski Submitted to the School of International Relations and the Graduate School of the University of St Andrews in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy June 2007 I, Wojciech Ostrowski, hereby certify that this thesis, which is approximately 100,000 words in length, has been written by me, that it is the record of work carried out by me and that it has not been submitted in any previous application for a higher degree. Date ………… Signature of Candidate ……………………………. I was admitted as a research student in September 2003 and as a candidate for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in September 2003; the higher study for which this is a record was carried out in the University of St Andrews between 2003 and 2007. Date ………… Signature of Candidate ……………………………. I hereby certify that the candidate has fulfilled the conditions of the Resolution and Regulations appropriate for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the University of St Andrews and that the candidate is qualified to submit this thesis in application for that degree.
    [Show full text]
  • The China and Eurasia Forum Quarterly
    THE CHINA AND EURASIA FORUM QUARTERLY Central Asia-Caucasus Institute & Silk Road Studies Program Volume 7, No. 2 May/June 2009 The China and Eurasia Forum Quarterly is a publication of the Central Asia-Caucasus Institute & Silk Road Studies Program. The Central Asia-Caucasus Institute & Silk Road Studies Program is a joint transatlantic independent and externally funded research and policy center. The Joint Center has offices in Washington and Stockholm, and is affiliated with the Paul H. Nitze School of Advanced International Studies of Johns Hopkins University and the Institute for Security and Development Policy (ISDP). It is the first Institution of its kind in Europe and North America, and is today firmly established as a leading center for research and policy worldwide, serving a large and diverse community of analysts, scholars, policy-watchers, business leaders and journalists. The Joint Center aims to be at the forefront of research on issues of conflict, security and development in the region; and to function as a focal point for academic, policy, and public discussion of the region through its applied research, its publications, teaching, research cooperation, public lectures and seminars. The China and Eurasia Forum is an independent forum which seeks to bring together regional experts, academics, government policy makers, and business leaders with an interest in the growing relationship between China and Eurasia. Focusing primarily on Sino-Central Asian, Sino-Russian, and Sino-Caucasian relations, the aim of China and Eurasia Forum Quarterly is to foster discussion and information sharing between a geographically distant community that recognizes the significance of China's emergence in this important part of the world.
    [Show full text]