DOCSLIB.ORG

Territorial Diagnostic of the Tara River Basin Biosphere Reserve and the Durmitor World Heritage Site in Montenegro

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Territorial Diagnostic of the Tara River Basin Biosphere Reserve and the Durmitor World Heritage Site in Montenegro UNESCO Office in Venice UNESCO Regional Bureau for Science and Culture in Europe (BRESCE) • Territorial Diagnostic of the Tara River Basin Biosphere Reserve and the Durmitor World Heritage Site in Montenegro UPDATED VERSION Davide Poletto (Ph.D.) Research grant 875.757.6 FR: 3240102709 Acknowledgments: Special thanks are reserved to UNESCO BRESCE-Science Section, Environmental Unit team, CHF-FORS Montenegro, The Department of International Relations of the Region of Veneto, the “bureau d’etude Antilia” of Turin (Italy), The Italian National Park of Dolomiti Bellunesi, the Italian Research Association for Sustainable Development Initiatives, Mr. Jérôme Gandin, and Mr. Michele Vivenzi for their precious contribution in funding, elaborating and finalising this research. 1 IT/2007/SC/PI/02 Disclaimer The authors are responsible for the choice and the presentation of the facts contained in this publication and for the opinions expressed therein, which are not necessarily those of UNESCO and do not commit the Organization. The designation employed and the presentation of material throughout this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of UNESCO concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. © UNESCO Office in Venice – UNESCO Regional Bureau for Science and Culture in Europe (BRESCE) 2007 Palazzo Zorzi – 4930 Castello, Venice, Italy Tel. +39-041-260-1511, Fax. +39-041-528-9995 Email: [email protected] Webpage: http://unesco.org/venice 2 INDEX PREMISE.…………………………………………………………………………………................4 INTRODUCTION……………………………………………………………………………..........….6 TERRITORIAL DIAGNOSTIC (PART I)- DATA ANALYSIS.............................................................9 GENERAL CHARACTERISTICS OF INTERVIWEES…………………………….…...……………......10 1. GENDER 2. AGE 3. FAMILY STRUCTURE 4. RESIDENCE & FACILITIES (1-2-3-4) 5. EDUCATION 6. PROFESSION (1-2-3-4) FIRST POINT OF FOCUS: GENERAL PERCEPTION OF THE TERRITORY AND ORIENTATIONS TOWARD THE ENVIRONMENT……………………………………..……………………………………………….22 1.SYMBOLS OF THE DURMITOR NATIONAL PARK 2. IMPORTANCE OF REGIONAL ELEMENTS SECOND POINT OF FOCUS: ORIENTATIONS TOWARD THE LOCAL DEVELOPMENT…...........…………………………………………………………………..………..28 1. PRIORITY SECTOR OF ACTIVITY 2. PRIORITY FIELDS OF INVOLVMENT 3. PREFERENCE OF INVESTMENTS 4. PERSONAL SKILL PERCEPTION IN TOURISM THIRD POINT OF FOCUS: ORIENTATIONS TOWARD THE ENVIRONMENT AND THE QUALITY OF LIFE………………………………………………………………………………………………....35 1. GENERAL PERCEPTION OF THE ENVIRONMENT 2. QUALITY OF LIFE 3. VISITS TO THE DURMITOR NATIONAL PARK 4. ISSUES TO BE ADDRESSED 5. FAVOURITE PLACES VISITED FOURTH POINT OF FOCUS: RELATIONS WITH KEY ACTORS IN SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT AND DECISION-MAKING PARTICIPATION…………………………………………………….…………….............................45 1. KEY ACTORS IN SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT 2 .BEST PARTNERS FOR LOCAL DEVELOPMENT 3.DECISION-MAKING PARTICIPATION IN ENVIRONMENTAL AFFAIRS CONCLUSIONS………………………………………………………………………………….......52 TERRITORIAL DIAGNOSTIC (PART II) ISSUES & OPERATIONAL RECOMMENDATIONS..................................................................................................................................55 BIBLIOGRAPHY.............................................................................................................................................62 ANNEXES: ¾ THE QUESTIONNAIRE ¾ MAP OF THE TARA RIVER BASIN BR & THE TARA RIVER CANYON IN RELATION TO THE BUK BIJELA DAM PROJECT ¾ MAP OF THE DURMITOR AREA ¾ ZONING MAP OF THE TARA RIVER BASIN BR & THE TARA RIVER CANYON –NATIONAL PARK OF DURMITOR - WH SITE ¾ MAP OF THE INTERVIEWED AREA 3 PREMISE The debated question of governance in the designated sites of the Tara River Basin Biosphere Reserve (TR BR) and the World Heritage Site (WHS) of Durmitor in Montenegro goes beneath a mere exercise for top driven legal frameworks provision (international governance) labelled under internationally recognised blasons. It is rather to incubate core principles of conservation and sustainability yielded by the aforementioned institutional devices in bottom and intermediate levels, informing them into effective regimes [VOGLER J. 2003] and sustained social interactions. In other terms, although World Heritage Sites (hereinafter WHS) and Biosphere Reserves (hereinafter BR) are different UNESCO instruments to accordingly provide conservation of natural and cultural sites of outstanding value and combining conservation and development in natural or human influenced ecosystems, their degree of success is determined by the behavioural regularities and convergent expectations in their implementation. This implies that the legal provisions of the aforementioned sites should be capable to mutually reinforcing behavioural regularities and expectations from territorial and international actors, leading to set robust regimes in to force. Such regimes should be consistent with the main objectives underpinned by the Man and Biosphere (MAB) Programme and the WH Convention. According to this perspective, international regimes on Human Rights or Sustainable Development do not exist as ideals or essence prior to their emergence rather they are outgrows of human behaviours. In many cases, indeed, legal provisions are poorly enforced and out of line with the real environmental policy, as laid down in the day by day practices, both at central and peripheral level. Therefore, environmental accords may be formally signed, sealed but de facto undelivered [OMSTROM E. 1990]. Proceeding from this general consideration, the watershed between legal agreements and social practices is characterised by the borderline which turns the former into the latter. Behavioural change is far more necessary than legal change in governance systems whereas government state functions are lacking (international relations), failing, semi- failing (countries in transition) or confronted by countervailing institutions pursuing conflating scope: getting short cash gain in turn of exploitation of natural resources, for instance. Therefore, although the ratification of international binding treaties (World Heritage Convention) or the adhesion to voluntary international programmes promoting sustainable development (MAB) by new state parties is encouraging, their effectiveness lays in the capacity to set an array of generalised behaviours consistent with this formal institutional devices, applied through time (customary behaviours) and space (territory) [YOUNG O. 2002]. The balance of forces to move forward or derail from pathways of sustainable development in Montenegro is evenly matched. The constitutional provision upon which Montenegro is a “democratic, social and ecological state” has to confront with unsustainable practices to boost mass tourism on the coasts, also spread toward the mountain and the rural areas of the Country. Tourism is rightly considered one key factor 4 of National development although this should be governed and domesticated according to the settings of a fragile ecosystem1. The core question here is the following: may UNESCO World Heritage Sites and Biosphere reserves become effective instruments to address biodiversity conservation, economic promotion and sustainable use of natural resources in Montenegro? Answers may result conflating if cognitive perception of local population about their territorial needs are neglected or unknown. Side effects of such misconceivements are also at the very basis of weak or failing effectiveness of regimes informing the sites management. Proceeding from this, social sciences have a word to say in environmental affairs, as they do often offer voice to the final constituencies of the designated sites such as in the purpose of this work. The TR BR (whereas the Heritage Property of Durmitor is one of the core zones) role to play, here, is for organising a collective system of living with natural resources following patterns which have not only to find a balance in developing the welfare of the community, preserving the environment, but also informing their livelihood and their own identities [COOPER,VARGAS 2004]. The finalisation of such system of territorial governance cannot be secured if cognitive elements are not duly investigated, considered and analysed and then uptaken by competent authorities. A substantial prove of this assertion comes from the state of art of the TR BR : this is actually a dead letter regime in where potentialities in the field of sustainable development for local population offered by the conceptual progress explicated under the Seville Strategy are almost non-existent. This comes also from the fact that the TR BR belongs to the early generations of BRs in where the conservational and scientific functions outweighed any other concern related to community consultation and participation, and on socio-economic development. Proceeding from this, the conceptual scope of this research is two folds: a) It aims at deepening a local based perception analysis on the UNESCO designated sites in the North-Western part of the territory of the Republic of Montenegro, namely, the TR BR and the Durmitor National Park (DNP), which coincides with the geographical extension of the World Heritage Site of Durmitor and the core area of the TR BR. b) It encompasses and it does offer follow up recommendations elaborated from a learning shared experience on sustainable development practices between DNP’s stakeholders and the National Park
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Final Report
    Ministry of Tourism and Environment SUSTAINABLE TOURISM INDICATORS AND DESTINATION MANAGEMENT Regional Workshop Kolašin, Montenegro, 25-27 April 2007 FINAL REPORT CONTENTS Foreword by Mr. Predrag Nenezic, Minister of Tourism and Environment of Montenegro 1 INTRODUCTION...................................................................................................... 3 2 SUSTAINABLE TOURISM IN MONTENEGRO AND THE BJELASICA AND KOMOVI REGION ........................................................................................... 5 3 WORKSHOP PRESENTATIONS AND VISITS...................................................... 11 4 METHODOLOGICAL APPROACH ........................................................................ 17 5 IDENTIFICATION OF ISSUES AND INDICATORS FOR SUSTAINABLE TOURISM IN BJELASICA AND KOMOVI.............................................................. 21 6 MONITORING AND MEASUREMENT PROCESSES ........................................... 41 7 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS FROM THE WORKSHOP............ 43 8 BASELINE INDICATORS FOR TOURISM DEVELOPMENT IN THE NORTHERN MOUNTAIN REGION OF MONTENEGRO ...................................... 45 ANNEX A: FORMS............................................................................................................ 49 Form 1 - Field visit evaluation sheet ............................................................................. 49 Form 2 - Situation analysis worksheet .......................................................................... 51 Form 3 - Sustainability
    [Show full text]
  • Tara-Drina National Park
    Feasibility study on establishing transboundary cooperation in the potential transboundary protected area: Tara-Drina National Park Prepared within the project “Sustaining Rural Communities and their Traditional Landscapes Through Strengthened Environmental Governance in Transboundary Protected Areas of the Dinaric Arc” ENVIRONMENT FOR PEOPLE A Western Balkans Environment & Development in the Dinaric Arc Cooperation Programme Author: Marijana Josipovic Photographs: Tara National Park archive Proofreading Linda Zanella Design and layout: Imre Sebestyen, jr. / UNITgraphics.com Available from: IUCN Programme Office for South-Eastern Europe Dr Ivana Ribara 91 11070 Belgrade, Serbia [email protected] Tel +381 11 2272 411 Fax +381 11 2272 531 www.iucn.org/publications Acknowledgments: A Special “thank you” goes to: Boris Erg, Veronika Ferdinandova (IUCN SEE), Dr. Deni Porej, (WWF MedPO), Ms. Aleksandra Mladenovic for commenting and editing the assessment text. Zbigniew Niewiadomski, consultant, UNEP Vienna ISCC for providing the study concept. Emira Mesanovic Mandic, WWF MedPO for coordinating the assessment process. 2 The designation of geographical entities in this publication, and the presentation of the material, do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of IUCN, WWFMedPO and SNV concerning the legal status of any country, territory, or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect those of IUCN, WWF MedPO and SNV. This publication has been made possible by funding from the Ministry for Foreign Affairs of Finland. Published by: IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Belgrade, Serbia in collaboration with WWFMedPO and SNV Copyright: © 2011 International Union for Conservation of Nature Reproduction of this publication for educational or other non-commercial purposes is authorized without prior written permission from the copyright holder, provided the source is fully acknowledged.
    [Show full text]
  • Drina Euroregion
    Crossing the borders. Studies on cross-border cooperation within the Danube Region Case Study of cross-border cooperation along the Serbian–Croatian border Drina Euroregion Contents 1. Introduction ......................................................................................................................... 2 2. The development of the cross-border cooperation .............................................................. 7 2.1 Establishment of the Drina Euroregion ......................................................................... 8 3. Determination of geographical confines ............................................................................ 11 3.1 The Serbian–Bosnian border section of the Drina Euroregion .................................. 11 3.2 The Serbian–Croatian border section of the Drina Euroregion ................................. 12 3.3 The Croatian–Bosnian border section of the Drina Euroregion ................................ 12 3.4 The Montenegrin–Bosnian border section of the Drina Euroregion......................... 13 3.5 The Montenegrin–Serbian border section of the Drina Euroregion ......................... 14 3.6 Geographic features of the Drina Euroregion area .................................................... 15 3.7 Administrative units – members ................................................................................. 20 4. Organisational and institutional structure, operation ......................................................... 28 Assembly ................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • (PA-BAT) in Montenegro
    REPORT ADRIA 2017 Protected Areas Benefit Assessment (PA-BAT) in Montenegro Protected Areas Benefit Assessment (PA-BAT) in Montenegro 1 CONTENT 4 WHO WE ARE / WHAT WE WANT TO ACHIEVE Lake © Piva Nature Park Trnovačko INTRODUCTION 5 METHODOLOGY 5 RESULTS AND DICUSSION 6 TOURISM 12 WATER RESOURCES IN PA 15 Publisher: WWF Adria, Budmanijeva 5, 17 10000 Zagreb, Honey PRODUCTION AND WILD FOOD Croatia Responsible person: JOBS IN PAs 20 Martin Šolar, Director of WWF Adria Authors: 21 Goran Sekulić, Flow OF BENEFITS Kasandra-Zorica Ivanić, Deni Porej Participation IN PA management 27 Photography on the front page: Durmitor © Matti Bernitz CHALLENGES 28 Design: Sandro Drinovac Contact: Recommendations FOR USING [email protected] 31 THE PA-BAT results [email protected] Recommendations FOR ADDRESSING Special thanks to Parks Dinarides- network 34 of protected areas in Dinarides for providing IDENTIFIED CHALLENGES information and support during report writing Printed on environmentally friendly paper CONCLUSION 39 May, 2017 2 Protected Areas Benefit Assessment (PA-BAT) in Montenegro Protected Areas Benefit Assessment (PA-BAT) in Montenegro 3 Who we are Introduction WWF is presenting key findings of an analysis that provides information and guidance on how various stakeholders perceive the current and potential WWF is one of the world’s leading non-governmental and non-profit value of protected areas. Based on discussions which involved around 50 organizations for nature conservation. WWF’s mission is to stop the experts, government officers, entrepreneurs, farmers and local community degradation of our planet’s natural environment, and to build a future in representatives, these results reflect the actual situation, challenges, and which people live in harmony with nature.
    [Show full text]
  • Springer Series in Physical Environment 2
    Springer Series in Physical Environment 2 Managing Editor D. Barsch, Heidelberg Editors I. Douglas, Manchester' F. Joly, Paris M. Marcus, Tempe· B. Messerli, Bern Advisory Board F. Ahnert, Aachen' V. R. Baker, Tucson R. G. Barry, Boulder' H. Bremer, Knln D. Brunsden, London' R. U. Cooke, London' R. Co que, Paris Y. Dewolf, Paris' P. Fogelberg, Helsinki· O. Franzle, Kiel I. Gams, Ljubljana' A. Godard, Meudon' A. Guilcher, Brest H. Hagedorn, Wiirzburg' J. Ives, Boulder S. Kozarski, Poznan' H. Leser, Basel' J. R. Mather, Newark J. Nicod, Aix-en-Provence' A. R. Orme, Los Angeles G. 0strem, Oslo' T. L. Pewe, Tempe· P. Rognon, Paris H. Rohdenburgt, Braunschweig· A. Semmel, Frankfurt/Main G. SUiblein, Bremen' H. Svensson, K0benhavn M. M. Sweeting, Oxford' R. W. Young, Wollongong Ognjen Bonacci Karst Hydrology With Special Reference to the Dinaric Karst With 119 Figures Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg New York London Paris Tokyo Professor Dr. OGNJEN BONACCI Civil Engineering Institute Faculty of Civil Engineering Sciences University of Split 58000 Split, V. Maslese b.b. Yugoslavia Translated by Zjena Vidovic-Culic ISBN-13: 978-3-642-83167-6 e-ISBN-13: 978-3-642-83165-2 DOl: 10.1007/978-3-642-83165-2 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data. Bonacci, Ognjen, 1942- Karst hydrology, with special reference to the Dinaric karst. (Springer series in physical environment ; 2) Bibliography: p. Includes index. 1. Hydrology, Karst. 2. Hydrology, Karst-Dinaric Alps. I. Title. II. Series. GB843.B66 1987 551.49 This work is subject to copyright. All rights are reserved, whether the whole or part of the material is concerned, specifically the rights of translation, reprinting, reuse of illus­ trations, recitation, broadcasting, reproduction on microfilms or in other ways, and stor­ age in data banks.
    [Show full text]
  • Bosnia and Herzegovina
    FIFTH NATIONAL REPORT TO THE UNITED NATIONS CONVENTION ON BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY OF BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA May, 2014 BASIC INFORMATION Project Title Support to Bosnia and Herzegovina for the Revision of the National Biodiversity Strategy and Action Plan (NBSAP BiH) and Development of the Fifth National Report to the UN Convention on Biological Diversity (UNCBD) Project Acronym NBSAP BiH Project Duration Period January 2013 – December 2014 GEF Implementation United Nations Environment Programme – UNEP Agency GEF Operational Focal Point Senad Oprašić, PhD, Head of the Environmental Protection for Bosnia and Herzegovina Department at the Ministry of Foreign Trade and Economic Relations of Bosnia and Herzegovina (MoFTER BiH) UNCBD Focal Point for BiH Mehmed Cero, M. Sc., Assistant Minister in the Environment Sector of the FBiH Ministry of Environment and Tourism (MoET FBiH) 2 Client: FBiH Ministry of Environment and Tourism Supported by: United Nations Environment Programme – UNEP External Associate Experts: Senka Barudanović Stjepan Matić Radoslav Dekić Dragojla Golub Consultant: Centre for Energy, Environment and Resources (CENER 21) Translation and Proofreading: Gordana Lonco Edina Dmitrović Graphic Design: Tarik Hodžić 3 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS We wish to thank the following institutions for the support that they provided in the development of the Fifth National Report to the United Nations Convention on Biological Diversity (UNCBD) and through their participation in workshops, provision of data, information, comments and suggestions: Aarhus Centre
    [Show full text]
  • Capacity Assessment Report with Recommendation For
    List of abbreviations B&H Bosnia and Herzegovina CA Capacity Assessment CB Capacity Building CD Capacity Development IUCN International Union for Conservation of Nature LGU Local Governmental Unit MARD Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development MSDT Ministry of Sustainable Development and Tourism MTMA Ministry of Transport and Maritime Affairs MNE Montenegro MU Management unit NEPA Nature and Environmental Protection Agency NGO Non Governmental Organization NPD National Park “Durmitor” NPS National Park “Sutjeska” PAs Protected Areas PENP Public Enterprise “National parks of Montenegro” ANNEXES ANNEX I QUESTIONNAIRE 2 Contents 1. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................................................................................................... 4 2.OBJECTIVE AND PLANNED RESULTS .................................................................................................................................................................... 6 3. METHODOLOGY ............................................................................................................................................................................................................... 7 4. ENABLING ENVIRONMENT ....................................................................................................................................................................................... 9 Overview of institutions ..................................................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Depleted Uranium in Bosnia and Herzegovina Revised Edition: May 2003
    First published in Switzerland in 2003 by the United Nations Environment Programme. Copyright © 2003, United Nations Environment Programme. ISBN 92-1-158619-4 This publication may be reproduced in whole or in part and in any form for educational or non-profit purposes without special permission from the copyright holder, provided acknowledgement of the source is made. UNEP would appreciate receiving a copy of any publication that uses this publication as a source. No use of this publication may be made for resale or for any other commercial purpose whatsoever without prior permission in writing from the United Nations Environment Programme. United Nations Environment Programme PO Box 30552 This report by the United Nations Environment Programme was made possible Nairobi by the generous contributions of the Governments of Italy and Switzerland. Kenya Tel: +254 2 621234 Fax: +254 2 624489/90 E-mail: [email protected] Web: http://www.unep.org Further information DISCLAIMER Copies of this report may be ordered from: This revised edition includes three chapters translated into the local language. SMI (Distribution Services) Limited The contents of this volume do not necessarily reflect the views of UNEP, or contributory organizations. The P. O . B o x 1 1 9 designations employed and the presentations do not imply the expressions of any opinion whatsoever on the Stevenage part of UNEP or contributory organizations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or Hertfordshire SG1 4TP, UK its authority, or concerning the
    [Show full text]
  • Buk-Bijela” Case for Montenegro
    TransboundaryTransboundary SEASEA (or(or lacklack ofof it)it) inin decisiondecision--makingmaking onon ““BUKBUK--BIJELABIJELA”” powerpower plantplant (case(case study)study) Prof dr Maja Kostic-Mandic, University of Montenegro Issues addressed in the presentation: • decision-making on disposal of natural resources under special legal regime • transboundary context • SEA and EIA constraints • public participation The project of building a dam that would flood part of: • the Tara River Basin Biosphere Reserve • the Tara River Canyon, a World Heritage Site and • Durmitor National Park World Heritage Site Applicable international conventions: • World Heritage Convention • Danube River Protection Convention • draft protocol regarding the Sava countries Relevant legislation: • Bosnia and Herzegovina entity Republika Srpska (no SEA and EIA provisions) and entity B&H Federation (SEA and EIA provisions in Environmental Protection Law) • State union Serbia and Montenegro Serbia (SEA and EIA laws) • the Republic of Montenegro (draft SEA and EIA laws) International legal documents setting standards, not binding between the parties • Espoo Convention • Aarhus Convention • EIA and SEA EU Directives “SEA and EIA procedure” in Montenegro • 1997 Physical Plan • No Strategy for the Energy sector • Agreement between the Republic of Srpska and the Republic of Montenegro • Environmental Study • joint commission The public participation issue • imposed by the affected local community, wide public, NGOs and scientists • “Tara Declaration” adopted • the role of UNESCO and international community Mayor gains of the “Buk-Bijela” case for Montenegro • Montenegrin government has halted plans to build a dam • raising public awareness regarding environmental issues • draft SEA and EIA laws to be adopted • the new draft Physical Plan encompassed SEA Further reading: • UNESCO-IUCN Report http://whc.unesco.org/archive/2005/mis100- 2005.pdf • M.
    [Show full text]
  • BOSNIA and HERZEGOVINA 30 Unforgettable Destinations
    Come, Enjoy, Pass It On BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA 30 Unforgettable Destinations Contents: 01. Neretva River - Upper Course 02. Neretva River - Middle Course 03. Mt. Prenj (Bosnian Himalayas) New 04. Blagaj and Podvelež Plateau 05. City of Mostar book 06. Wine Route and Međugorje www.come-enjoy-bosnia.com 07. Neum and its Hinterland 08. Stolac and Počitelj 09. Southeast Herzegovina 20. Northeast Bosnia 10. Tara River and Sutjeska NP 21. Tajan Nature Park Those who have already been to Bosnia and Herzegovina know that 11. City of Sarajevo 22. Around Usora River the country offers a great deal: from enjoying its clear and capricious rivers, 12. Around Sarajevo 23. Mt. Vlašić and Travnik which are perfect for rafting and fishing, its large mountains that attract hikers 13. Mt. Bjelašnica 24. Jajce and Pliva Lakes and skiers, and its numerous caves, to visiting the country’s cities with their 14. Mt. Treskavica 25. Skopaljska Valley many cultural and historical landmarks left behind by the Illyrians, Romans, 15. Fojnica and Kraljeva Sutjeska 26. Livno and Surroundings Byzantines, Ottomans, Austro-Hungarians, and multiple Slavic cultures. 16. Olovo, Vareš and Surroundings 27. Banja Luka and Kozara NP Bosnia and Herzegovina also boasts a rich cultural and social life. 17. Mt.s Jahorina and Romanija 28. Sana River - Middle Course If any of these things interest you, then you’ve found both the right book 18. Drina River - Upper Course 29. Una National Park and future destination! 19. Srebrenica and Surroundings 30. Una River - Middle Course Drina Una Tara Neretva This book is divided into 30 About the book: chapters, of which 2 are dedicated to the cities of Mostar and Sarajevo, 208 pages with over 1500 Photos while the remaining 28 focus on different destinations across Bosnia 1st Edition 2014 and Herzegovina.
    [Show full text]
  • Preliminary Flood Risk Assessment in the Sava River Basin
    PRELIMINARY FLOOD RISK ASSESSMENT IN THE SAVA RIVER BASIN July, 2014 Date Document Revision History Document Author/Reviser 23 September 2013 Initial draft – sent to PEG FP for comments Secretariat/ PEG FP 17 December 2013 Draft 2 – sent to PEG FP for comments Secretariat/ V. Tusić, M. Babić Mladenović 30 January 2014 Draft 2.1 – reviewed at 23rd PEG FP meeting Secretariat/ PEG FP 20 March 2014 Draft 3 – sent to PEG FP for comments Secretariat/ V. Tusić, A. Bezdrob 14 April 2014 Draft 3.1 – sent as doc. for 24th PEG FP meeting Secretariat/ PEG FP 02 June 2014 Draft 4 – sent to PEG FP for comments Secretariat/ V. Tusić 10 June 2014 Draft 4.1 – sent to PEG FP for approval Secretariat/ PEG FP (no comments) 18 June 2014 Draft 5 – sent to ISRBC Secretariat/ ISRBC 01 July 2014 ISRBC accepted and approved publishing on web ISRBC International Sava River Basin Commission Kneza Branimira 29 10 000 Zagreb, Croatia T: + 385 1 488 69 60 F: + 385 1 488 69 86 [email protected] www.savacommission.org TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................................... 1 2 GENERAL INFORMATION ON THE SAVA RIVER BASIN .................................................................. 3 3 OVERALL APPROACH AND METHODOLOGY ..................................................................................... 4 3.1 SLOVENIA ...........................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Experience of Tourists in Northern and Southern Montenegro
    The Experience of Tourists in Northern and Southern Montenegro A survey is conducted by the Centre for Sustainable Tourism Initiatives (CSTI) and the Center for Entrepreneurship and Economic Development (CEED) with support from the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) through the CHF International CRDA-E program Decembar 2007 The Experience of Tourists in Northern and Southern Montenegro CENTRE FOR SUSTAINABLE TOURISM INITIATIVES (CSTI) SURVEY: The Experience of Tourists in Northern and Southern Montenegro EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR: Slavica Vukevi PROJECT COORDINATOR: Vildana Jahi Svetlana Vujii CONSULTANT ON THE PROJECT: Kelli Mullen Brown, CHF International THE CENTER FOR ENTREPRENEURSHIP AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT (CEED) EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR: Dragana Radevi SURVEY COORDINATORS: Slavica Nikoli Ivana Boanovi Milijana Komar All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or distributed in any form or by any means without the prior written permission of CSTI & CEED. Published with support from the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) through the CHF International, Community Revitalization through Democratic Action – Economy (CRDA-E) program. The opinions expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the U.S. Agency for International Development. For more information please contact CSTI by email at [email protected] or: CSTI Moskovska 63 - 4 81000 Podgorica, Montenegro +382 20 229 636 2 December 2007 The Experience of Tourists in Northern and Southern Montenegro CONTENT INTRODUCTORY REMARKS ......................................................................... 4 SAMPLE AND METHODOLOGY ................................................................... 10 PART I VISITORS OF NORTHERN MONTENEGRO....................................... 12 1. DEMOGRAPHIC PROFILE OF VISITORS ........................................................13 2. MAIN MOTIVES FOR COMING TO MONTENEGRO AND INFORMATION SOURCES 16 3.
    [Show full text]