Springer Series in Physical Environment 2
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Socio Economic Analysis of Northern Montenegrin Region
SOCIO ECONOMIC ANALYSIS OF THE NORTHERN REGION OF MONTENEGRO Podgorica, June 2008. FOUNDATION F OR THE DEVELOPMENT O F NORTHERN MONTENEGRO (FORS) SOCIO -ECONOMIC ANLY S I S O F NORTHERN MONTENEGRO EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR : Veselin Šturanović STUDY REVIEWER S : Emil Kočan, Nebojsa Babovic, FORS Montenegro; Zoran Radic, CHF Montenegro IN S TITUTE F OR STRATEGIC STUDIE S AND PROGNO S E S ISSP’S AUTHOR S TEAM : mr Jadranka Kaluđerović mr Ana Krsmanović mr Gordana Radojević mr Ivana Vojinović Milica Daković Ivan Jovetic Milika Mirković Vojin Golubović Mirza Mulešković Marija Orlandić All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or distributed in any form or by any means wit- hout the prior written permission of FORS Montenegro. Published with support from the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) through the CHF International, Community Revitalization through Democratic Action – Economy (CRDA-E) program. The opinions expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the U.S. Agency for Interna- tional Development. For more information please contact FORS Montenegro by email at [email protected] or: FORS Montenegro, Berane FORS Montenegro, Podgorica Dušana Vujoševića Vaka Đurovića 84 84300, Berane, Montenegro 81000, Podgorica, Montenegro +382 51 235 977 +382 20 310 030 SOCIO ECONOMIC ANALYSIS OF THE NORTHERN REGION OF MONTENEGRO CONTENTS ABBREVIATIONS: ............................................................................................................................................................... -
Biodiversity of Herpetofauna of the Prenj and Čvrsnica Mts. (Bosnia and Herzegovina)
Original Scientific Paper Hyla VOL. 2014., No. 2, Str. 4 - 19 Šunje et al. 2014 ISSN: 1848-2007 Biodiversity of herpetofauna of the Prenj and Čvrsnica Mts. (Bosnia and Herzegovina) Bioraznolikost herpetofaune planina Prenj i Čvrsnica (Bosna i Hercegovina) 1 1 1 1 1 1 EMINA ŠUNJE* , ADNAN ZIMIĆ , BORIS STJEPANOVIĆ , BENJAMIN JUSIĆ , MIRZA ČENGIĆ , MAJA BRADARIĆ , 1 SAUDIN MERDAN 1Herpetological Association in Bosnia and Hercegovina ATRA, Sarajevo, Bosnia and Hercegovina; *Corresponding author: [email protected] Abstract Herpetological research of the Prenj and Čvrsnica mountains has a relatively long tradition, but not enough scientific attention was devoted to them. Literature data on herpetofauna of Prenj and Čvrsnica is old, sporadic and rare. The aim of this research was to collect all data on the herpetofauna for the given mountains and determine the importance of the area for the herpetofaunal biodiversity of Bosnia and Herzegovina (B-H). The analysis of data showed that the area of Prenj and Čvrsnica is inhabited by 11 species of amphibians (55 % of the total number of amphibians in B-H) and 24 species of reptiles (83% of the total number of reptiles in B-H) which differ in vertical and horizontal distribution. The registered biodiversity is extremely high and is a consequence of the geographical position of these mountains which border the Mediterranean climate zone in B-H. Key words: distribution, submediterranean, amphibians, reptiles, biodiversity. Sažetak Herpetološka istraživanja planina Prenj i Čvrsnica imaju relativno dugu tradiciju, no znanje o njima još uvijek nije zadovoljavajuće. Literaturni podaci o herpetofauni Prenja i Čvrsnice su stari, sporadični i rijetki. -
Drina Euroregion
Crossing the borders. Studies on cross-border cooperation within the Danube Region Case Study of cross-border cooperation along the Serbian–Croatian border Drina Euroregion Contents 1. Introduction ......................................................................................................................... 2 2. The development of the cross-border cooperation .............................................................. 7 2.1 Establishment of the Drina Euroregion ......................................................................... 8 3. Determination of geographical confines ............................................................................ 11 3.1 The Serbian–Bosnian border section of the Drina Euroregion .................................. 11 3.2 The Serbian–Croatian border section of the Drina Euroregion ................................. 12 3.3 The Croatian–Bosnian border section of the Drina Euroregion ................................ 12 3.4 The Montenegrin–Bosnian border section of the Drina Euroregion......................... 13 3.5 The Montenegrin–Serbian border section of the Drina Euroregion ......................... 14 3.6 Geographic features of the Drina Euroregion area .................................................... 15 3.7 Administrative units – members ................................................................................. 20 4. Organisational and institutional structure, operation ......................................................... 28 Assembly ................................................................................................................................ -
Aquaculture Development in Bosnia and Herzegovina
27 Aquaculture development in Bosnia and Herzegovina Jasmin Omeragić Veterinary Faculty Veterinary Faculty of the University of Sarajevo Zmaja od Bosne 90, 71000 Sarajevo Bosnia and Herzegovina [email protected] Omeragić, J. 2009. Aquaculture development in Bosnia and Herzegovina. In M.G. Bondad-Reantaso, J.R. Arthur and R.P. Subasinghe (eds). Strengthening aquaculture health management in Bosnia and Herzegovina. FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Technical Paper. No. 524. Rome, FAO. pp 27–33. ABSTRACT Bosnia and Herzegovina has a very long and rich tradition in aquaculture. Important advantages that the country possesses for the development of aquaculture include abundant clean water, high-quality, educated and cheap labour, high capability of fish processing factories, and the high quality of its hatcheries. Thanks to these and other factors, Bosnia and Herzegovina has a great potential for increasing national aquaculture production. During the war period of 1991–1995, the majority of the fish farms were destroyed along with their entire infrastructure. After the war, the process of privatization started, leading to an increase in fish production. The privatization of the fish farms, which since 1995 were in the possession of the State, has broadened the possibilities for aquaculture development in the country, including the use of new technologies, the expansion of capacity and the production of high-quality feeds. The export of fish and fish products from Bosnia and Herzegovina to European Union markets as officially permitted by EU Decision 2008/156/EC is the most important success of Bosnia and Herzegovina’s agriculture sector in the post-war period. INTRODUCTION Bosnia and Herzegovina is located in the Western Balkans region and has a total surface area of 51 209.2 km2, of which land accounts for 51 197 km2 and sea accounts for 12.2 km2. -
STREAMS of INCOME and JOBS: the Economic Significance of the Neretva and Trebišnjica River Basins
STREAMS OF INCOME AND JOBS: The Economic Significance of the Neretva and Trebišnjica River Basins CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 3 Highlights – The Value of Water for Electricity 5 Highlights – The Value of Water for Agriculture 8 Highlights – The Value of Public Water Supplie 11 Highlights – The Value of Water for Tourism 12 Conclusion: 13 BACKGROUND OF THE BASINS 15 METHODOLOGY 19 LAND USE 21 GENERAL CONTEXT 23 THE VALUE OF WATER FOR ELECTRICITY 29 Background of the Trebišnjica and Neretva hydropower systems 30 Croatia 33 Republika Srpska 35 Federation Bosnia and Herzegovina 37 Montenegro 40 Case study – Calculating electricity or revenue sharing in the Trebišnjica basin 41 Gap Analysis – Water for Electricity 43 THE VALUE OF WATER FOR AGRICULTURE 45 Federation Bosnia and Herzegovina 46 Croatia 51 Case study – Water for Tangerines 55 Case study – Wine in Dubrovnik-Neretva County 56 Case study – Wine in Eastern Herzegovina 57 Republika Srpska 57 Gap Analysis – Water for Agriculture 59 Montenegro 59 THE VALUE OF PUBLIC WATER SUPPLIES 63 Republika Srpska 64 Federation Bosnia and Herzegovina 66 Montenegro 68 Croatia 69 Gap Analysis – Public Water 70 THE VALUE OF WATER FOR TOURISM 71 Croatia 72 CONCLUSION 75 REFERENCES 77 1st edition Author/data analysis: Hilary Drew With contributions from: Zoran Mateljak Data collection, research, and/or translation support: Dr. Nusret Dresković, Nebojša Jerković, Zdravko Mrkonja, Dragutin Sekulović, Petra Remeta, Zoran Šeremet, and Veronika Vlasić Design: Ivan Cigić Published by WWF Adria Supported by the -
Neretva and Trebišnjica River Basin (NTRB)
E1468 Consulting Services for Environment Impact Assessment Public Disclosure Authorized in the Neretva and Trebišnjica River Basin (NTRB) No. TF052845/GE-P084608 Public Disclosure Authorized F I N A L EIA R E P O R T Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Sarajevo/Banja Luka, August 2006 Bosnia and Herzegovina and Croatia Proposed Integrated Ecosystem Management of the Nerteva and Trebišnjica River Basin (NTRB) Project Table of Contents Abbreviations and Acronyms EXECUTIVE SUMMARY List of Tables List of Pictures List of Annexes References 1. PROJECT DESCRIPTION .....................................................................................14 1.1. Background .............................................................................................. 14 1.2. Project objectives..................................................................................... 15 1.3. Project components ................................................................................. 16 2. POLICY, LEGAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE FRAMEWORK ......................................21 2.1. Overall Project Implementation Arrangements....................................... 21 2.2. Requirements of the WB .......................................................................... 22 2.3. Bosnia and Herzegovina environmental policy ........................................ 23 2.4. Legislation of Republic of Croatia ............................................................ 26 2.5. Evaluation of project environmental aspects .................................................27 -
Buk-Bijela” Case for Montenegro
TransboundaryTransboundary SEASEA (or(or lacklack ofof it)it) inin decisiondecision--makingmaking onon ““BUKBUK--BIJELABIJELA”” powerpower plantplant (case(case study)study) Prof dr Maja Kostic-Mandic, University of Montenegro Issues addressed in the presentation: • decision-making on disposal of natural resources under special legal regime • transboundary context • SEA and EIA constraints • public participation The project of building a dam that would flood part of: • the Tara River Basin Biosphere Reserve • the Tara River Canyon, a World Heritage Site and • Durmitor National Park World Heritage Site Applicable international conventions: • World Heritage Convention • Danube River Protection Convention • draft protocol regarding the Sava countries Relevant legislation: • Bosnia and Herzegovina entity Republika Srpska (no SEA and EIA provisions) and entity B&H Federation (SEA and EIA provisions in Environmental Protection Law) • State union Serbia and Montenegro Serbia (SEA and EIA laws) • the Republic of Montenegro (draft SEA and EIA laws) International legal documents setting standards, not binding between the parties • Espoo Convention • Aarhus Convention • EIA and SEA EU Directives “SEA and EIA procedure” in Montenegro • 1997 Physical Plan • No Strategy for the Energy sector • Agreement between the Republic of Srpska and the Republic of Montenegro • Environmental Study • joint commission The public participation issue • imposed by the affected local community, wide public, NGOs and scientists • “Tara Declaration” adopted • the role of UNESCO and international community Mayor gains of the “Buk-Bijela” case for Montenegro • Montenegrin government has halted plans to build a dam • raising public awareness regarding environmental issues • draft SEA and EIA laws to be adopted • the new draft Physical Plan encompassed SEA Further reading: • UNESCO-IUCN Report http://whc.unesco.org/archive/2005/mis100- 2005.pdf • M. -
Public Investment Programme in the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina for the 2006 -2008 Period
BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA FEDERATION OF BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA G O V E R N M E N T PUBLIC INVESTMENT PROGRAMME IN THE FEDERATION OF BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA FOR THE 2006 -2008 PERIOD Sarajevo, March 2006 CONTENTS: v PUBLIC INVESTMENT PROGRAMME OF FBIH 2006-2008 INTRODUCTION 1-3 v PUBLIC INVESTMENT PROGRAMME OF FBIH 2006-2008 Table 1: General overview of the planned investment by financier and years 4 v PUBLIC INVESTMENT PROGRAMME OF FBIH 2006-2008 Table 2: Annual investments by financier, sectors and projects 6 - 77 v PUBLIC INVESTMENT PROGRAMME OF FBIH 2006-2008 Table 3: General overview of the foreign funds needed for 2006-2008 by sectors 78 v PUBLIC INVESTMENT PROGRAMME OF FBIH 2006-2008 Table 4: Overview of the foreign funds needed for 2006-2008 79 - 91 PUBLIC INVESTMENT PROGRAMME OF FBIH 2006-2008 FEDERATION OF BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA PUBLIC INVESTMENT PROGRAM FOR THE PERIOD 2006-2008 A) INTRODUCTION The Public investment program (hereinafter:PIP) for the period of 2006-2008 has been prepared through the updating of the previous PIP, and all in accordance with the Decree on the Establishing of the Coordination Mechanism for Management and Coordination of Development Funds in the Federation of BiH («Official Gazette of FBiH», number 48/03). Bosnia and Herzegovina's Development Strategy (PRSP) and the Budget Framework (Medium Term Expenditure Framework 2006-2008 ) were taken into consideration in preparing of the PIP 2006-2008, in order to implement polices and strategies these documents foresaw, as well as to plan in line with the financial restrictions regarding the new loan taking. -
Introduction
WILD SOUL OF EUROPE Introduction The Chamber of Commerce & Industry of Serbia and the Chamber of Economy of Montenegro, on the initiative of the Embassy of Montenegro in Belgrade, and in cooperation with the Tourist Organisation of Serbia and the National Tourism Organisation of Montenegro, have created this unique tourist offer. The programmes presented in this brochure are based on the specific natural and cultural heritage of Montenegro and the Republic of Serbia. The aim of this joint tourism product is to promote regional cooperation in the field of tourism, to achieve greater recognition for the region, to extend the tourist season and to ensure the better presentation of tourist programmes on third markets. The seven tours presented in this brochure were developed by the two Chambers with the idea of addressing a wide range of tourists, thus the offer includes some tough adventurous experiences, hiking, cycling, off-road jeep tours, traditional dishes and wine tasting etc. This brochure is confirmation that tourism is well-recognised as an important instrument of regional cooperation and a powerful catalyst for the European integration process. We are confident that our joint tourist product will enrich the tourism offer as a whole, with consideration for all of our peculiarities, specificities and diversities. WILD SOUL OF EUROPE Wheels of steel 9-DAY CYCLING TOUR HIGHLIGHT With its many gorges and steep cliffs, the Tresnjica area resembles a canyon. Of extraordinary importance to the wildlife of the area is the fact that it has been designated as a nature reserve in order to preserve the natural habitat of the very rare, endangered griffon vulture, dubbed ‘The Emperor of the Heights and the Nature Cleaner’ Day 3 TRESNJICA RIVER Mountain cycling tour over the Tresnjica River Gorge. -
Zakon-Vode-HNK.Pdf
Na osnovu člana 39. Ustava Hercegovačko-neretvanskog kantona (Službene novine HNK, broj:2/98, 4/00 i 7/04), Skupština Hercegovačko-neretvanskog kantona na XXV sjednici održanoj dana 28.06.2013. god. donosi: ZAKON O VODAMA HERCEGOVAČKO-NERETVANSKOG KANTONA I. OSNOVNE ODREDBE Član 1. (Predmet Zakona) (1) Ovim zakonom uređuje se razvrstavanje površinskih voda, vodno dobro i vodni objekti, upravljanje vodama, korištenje voda, zaštita voda, uređenje i održavanje vodotoka i drugih voda i zaštita od štetnog djelovanja voda, informacioni sistem voda, vodni akti, ograničenja prava vlasništva korisnika zemljišta, organizacija upravljanja vodama, financiranje upravljanja vodama, nadzor nad provođenjem zakona, kaznene odredbe i druga pitanja značajna za vode unutar teritorije Hercegovačko-neretvanskog kantona (u daljnjem tekstu: Kanton), a koja su Federalnim zakonom o vodama (Službene novine FBiH, broj:70/06) (u daljem tekstu: Federalni Zakon) stavljena u nadležnost Kantona. (2) Upravljanje vodama obuhvata zaštitu voda, korištenje voda, zaštitu od štetnog djelovanja voda i uređenje vodotoka i drugih voda. Član 2. (Svrha Zakona) Svrha ovog zakona je osiguranje upravljanja vodama s ciljem: a) smanjenja zagađenja voda, postizanja dobrog stanja voda i sprečavanje degradacije voda; b) postizanja održivog korištenja voda; c) osiguranja pravičnog pristupa vodama; d) poticanja društvenog i privrednog razvoja; e) zaštite ekosistema; f) smanjenja rizika od poplava i drugih negativnih utjecaja voda; g) osiguranja učešća javnosti u donošenju odluka koje se odnose na vode; h) sprečavanja i rješavanja sukoba vezanih za zaštitu i korištenje voda; i) ispunjavanja obaveza iz međunarodnih ugovora koji su obavezujući za Bosnu i Hercegovinu, a odnose se na područje Kantona. II. OSNOVNA NAČELA I DEFINICIJE Član 3. (Opća načela) 1 (1) Vode su opće dobro i kao takve su pod posebnom zaštitom Bosne i Hercegovine, Federacije BiH, Kantona , grada i općine. -
Hercegovacki Toponim Tribizet, Trebizet Ili Trebizat
FILOLOGIJA, KNJIGA 16, ZAGREB 1988. YU ISSN 0449-363 X UDK 801.311(497.1 Hercegovina) Izvorni znanstveni clanak Primljeno 10/1988. DANIJEL ALERIC, ZAGREB HERCEGOVACKI TOPONIM TRIBIZET, TREBIZET ILI TREBIZAT Rijec je 0 imenu koje nos i posljednja dionica najduzega pr~toka rijeke Neret:ve, odnosno selo koje se nalazi blizu njegova usca. Od baouju se dosadaSnja miSljenja 0 njegovu porijeklu ,j znacenju, me du njtima i Skokovo. Iznose se indicije da je vjerojatno pre<lslavenskoga porijclda. Upozorava se na znacajni ,r,imski 'Vojni logor koji je &tajao bliw mjes,ta gdje Neretvin pritok dobiva dme Tribizel i na ime rlrnske putne stanice Bigeste u Jstom kraju. Zakljucuje se da se je taj logor zvao *Tutre(s) Bigesti(s) i da je njegovo ime saeuvano upravo u topa nimu Triblzet ili sI. 1. Najduzi pritok rijeke Neretve izvire nesto zapadnije od Imotskoga, u Proloscu na rubu Imotskoga polja, a utjeee u Neretvu nesto juznije od capljine, u Strugama. U svom tom iprolazi najprije cijelom duzinom Itffiot skoga polja. Zatim, na potezu dugu oko 2,5 km, teee ispod zemlje. Ponovno izbija iz goleme peCine na nadmorskoj visini nizoj za stotinjak metara i bhä stijesnjenom dolinom prema Ljubuskom polju. Prolazi cijelom duZi nom toga polja, koritom koje je pretezno regulirano jos u prvoj polovini XIX. st. Ispod sela Humca ponovno hita kroz stijesnjenu doLinu praveCi na jednom mjestu znameniti slap Kravicu, visok oko 25 m. Dalje se jedno vrijeme probija kroz sutjesku. Na kraju prolazi cijelom duzinom Trebizat skoga polja. Ako se zanemarj ona cinjenica da je u gornjem toku krace vrijeme nevidljiv, onda je dug viSe od 76 km.! Vec na svom putu kroz Imotsko polje ta jerijeka siroka deset-petnaest metara ,j teee koritom koje je duboko tni-eetiri metra. -
Financing for Hydropower in Protected Areas in Southeast Europe: 2018 Update
Financing for hydropower in protected areas in Southeast Europe: 2018 update March 2018 ! Research and writing Igor Vejnović, CEE Bankwatch Network Pippa Gallop, CEE Bankwatch Network with additional research by Lyubomir Kostadinov and Andrey Ralev Acknowledgements Viktor Berishaj, Kosovo Viktor Bjelić, Center for Environment, Bosnia and Herzegovina Aleksandra Bujaroska, Front 21/42, Macedonia Milija Čabarkapa, Green Home, Montenegro Ana Colovic-Lesoska, Eco-sense - Center for environmental research and information Ulrich Eichelmann, Riverwatch, Austria Denis Frančišković, Eko-pan, Croatia Ellen Frank-Lajqi, ERA, Kosovo Jelena Ivanić, Center for Environment, Bosnia and Herzegovina Nataša Milivojević, Ekološko Udruženje RZAV, Serbia Olsi Nika, EcoAlbania, Albania Robert Oroz, Eko-Gotuša, Bosnia-Herzegovina Irma Popović Dujmović, WWF Adria, Croatia Ivan Posinjak, web/database developer, Croatia Theresa Schiller, EuroNatur Stiftung, Germany Dr Ulrich Schwarz, Fluvius consultancy, Austria Editing Pippa Gallop, CEE Bankwatch Network Layout Meher Badia, David Hoffman, CEE Bankwatch Network Photographs Cover image: Matic Oblak: Construction of the Medna Sana hydropower plant near the source of the river Sana, Bosnia-Herzegovina, June 2017 This publication is a part of the "Save the Blue Heart of Europe" campaign organised by EuroNatur – European Nature Heritage Foundation (www.euronatur.org) and Riverwatch – Society for the Protection of rivers (www.riverwatch.eu/en/). Supported by MAVA Foundation and Manfred-Hermsen-Stiftung. 1 Contents Glossary of key concepts Executive summary 1. Introduction 2. Overview of results 2.1 The companies behind the projects 2.2 The projects’ financiers 3. Country profiles 3.1 Albania 3.2 Bosnia and Herzegovina 3.3 Bulgaria 3.4 Croatia 3.5 Kosovo 3.6 Macedonia 3.7 Montenegro 3.8 Serbia 3.9 Slovenia 4.