DOCSLIB.ORG

Public Investment Programme in the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina for the 2006 -2008 Period

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Public Investment Programme in the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina for the 2006 -2008 Period BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA FEDERATION OF BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA G O V E R N M E N T PUBLIC INVESTMENT PROGRAMME IN THE FEDERATION OF BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA FOR THE 2006 -2008 PERIOD Sarajevo, March 2006 CONTENTS: v PUBLIC INVESTMENT PROGRAMME OF FBIH 2006-2008 INTRODUCTION 1-3 v PUBLIC INVESTMENT PROGRAMME OF FBIH 2006-2008 Table 1: General overview of the planned investment by financier and years 4 v PUBLIC INVESTMENT PROGRAMME OF FBIH 2006-2008 Table 2: Annual investments by financier, sectors and projects 6 - 77 v PUBLIC INVESTMENT PROGRAMME OF FBIH 2006-2008 Table 3: General overview of the foreign funds needed for 2006-2008 by sectors 78 v PUBLIC INVESTMENT PROGRAMME OF FBIH 2006-2008 Table 4: Overview of the foreign funds needed for 2006-2008 79 - 91 PUBLIC INVESTMENT PROGRAMME OF FBIH 2006-2008 FEDERATION OF BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA PUBLIC INVESTMENT PROGRAM FOR THE PERIOD 2006-2008 A) INTRODUCTION The Public investment program (hereinafter:PIP) for the period of 2006-2008 has been prepared through the updating of the previous PIP, and all in accordance with the Decree on the Establishing of the Coordination Mechanism for Management and Coordination of Development Funds in the Federation of BiH («Official Gazette of FBiH», number 48/03). Bosnia and Herzegovina's Development Strategy (PRSP) and the Budget Framework (Medium Term Expenditure Framework 2006-2008 ) were taken into consideration in preparing of the PIP 2006-2008, in order to implement polices and strategies these documents foresaw, as well as to plan in line with the financial restrictions regarding the new loan taking. B) PUBLIC INVESTMENT PROGRAM The Draft PIP 2006-2008 has been made based on the assessment and prioritization process. It contains the ongoing, completed, approved and nominated projects. It was analyzed by the PIP Commission, and afterwards submitted to the FBiH Government. Projects proposed to be included into PIP were submitted to the evaluation and prioritization processes within the Federation ministries and cantons, which delivered to the Federation Ministry of Finances, and the relevant Coordination Unit, the lists of the nominated projects with the priority rating. Criteria used in order to include the projects into PIP 2006-2008 were: - ranking at the priority list that the certain project proposed by the Federation ministry or the canton has; - its accordance with the PRSP; - the level of possible credit funds that the canton is able to sustain; - more balanced regional development; - financial limitations and priorities set out by the Medium Term Expenditure Framework in FBiH for 2006-2008. Total payments foreseen during the period 2006-2008 mount up to 1.334,7 mil KM. BAM 596,1 millions (44,7% %) of that amount refers to the ongoing projects, BAM 216,7 millions (16,2%) to the approved projects, BAM 48,4(3,6%) to the projects in preparation while BAM 473,5 millions (35,5%) represents the new financing agreements that have to be signed (BAM 438,6 millions out of that amount goes for high priority projects, 34,9 millions for medium priority projects ). It is estimated that the public investments from own sources in the medium term period will reach the amount of BAM 365,2 millions. That represents 27% of the total investments in the Federation of BiH. In addition estimates foresee some BAM 969,6 millions of foreign investments. The allocation of funds by sectors for the period 2006-2008 can be seen in the following table. PIP 2006-2008 includes the domestic and foreign funds, ongoing and approved projects and the projects proposed the financing of which yet has to be provided 1 Allocation of funds – sector-vise in a period 2006-2008: u 000 BAM Medium Projects High Total Ongoing Aproved priority Sector in priority PIP 2006- projects projects projects (%) preparation projects 2008. 1 2 3 4 5 Administration 594 594 Public safety 2.706 585 70 3.361 0,3 Demining 0 15.759 15.759 1,2 Education 21.159 2.020 2.345 25.524 1,9 Health 13.989 43.449 53.032 110.470 8,3 Social Protection 18.486 14.024 260 32.770 2,5 Agriculture 31.140 579 31.719 2,4 Water 39.022 45.046 500 156.864 15.500 256.932 19,1 Management Forestry 6.962 6.962 0,5 Culture, 13.446 3.473 16,919 1,3 Recreation, Religion and Sports Energy and 80.897 69.716 0 38.170 5.720 194.503 14,5 Mining Transport and 295.415 38.300 35.500 120.660 12.775 502.650 37,7 communications Industry 5.000 5.000 0,4 Entrepreneurship 6.524 6.524 0,5 Other sectors 23.595 44 1.400 23.790 48.829 3,7 Environment - 48.639 9.000 17680 900 76.219 5,7 Urban Planning TOTAL 596.050 216.743 48.420 438.629 34.895 1.334.738 100 Of which : Budget 140.231 64.110 3.000 104.856 3.135 315.332 23,6 Donation 19.232 41.747 0 3.716 0 64.695 4,8 Credits 393.027 109.145 45.420 325.465 31.760 904.817 67,8 Own 43.559 1.741 0 4.591 0 49.892 3,7 resources of companies External 412.259 150.892 45.420 329.182 31.760 969.514 27,3 Financing Local 183.791 65.851 3.000 109.447 3.135 365.224 72,7 Financing Within the macroeconomic restrictions, and according to the Medium Term Expenditure Framework in FBiH for 2006-2008, the total non-commercial foreign debt for investments, mounts up to BAM 360 mil. This foreign debt limit refers to all the sectors and it is very restrictive. Having in mind the financial restrictions regarding the possibility to obtain favorable funds for financing of development needs, projects at the cantonal and the Federation level have been prioritized. Appropriate allocation by sectors for the new, priority investments within the PIP 2006-2008 has been conducted based on that. Base on the sector allocation for new – proposed projects deriving from the requests made by cantonal and Federation ministries, we may conclude that the process followed the 2 recommendations of the PRSP and the Medium Term Expenditure Framework for the Federation of BiH – basic documents defining the Government policies for the forthcoming period. C) TABLES Following tables given in an attachment are an integral part of PIP. Table 1 gives a summary of the implementation plan for the projects in a period 2006- 2008, and that is, total – sector-vise, as well as the summary of the project implementation by sectors. A Tables 2 provides annual investments by financier, sectors and financijers. This overview includes the foreign financed ongoing projects with lokal countrapart, approved projects, projects in preparation and those completed. Table 3 provides and overview of planned high and middle priority nominated projects included into PIP. Table 4 gives overview of the foreign funds needed forr 2006-2008. Government of Federation and the cantonal governments are supposed to find the investors for the projects listed here. ---------------------- D) CONCLUSIONS 1. The FBiH Public Investment Programme 2006-2008 has been approved and submitted to the Ministry of Foreign Trade and Economic Relations with the objective of drafting Bosnia and Herzegovina’s 2006-2008 Public Investments Programme which is an integral part of the Bosnia and Herzegovina Development Strategy – PRSP. 2. The Government of the Federation and all the line ministries are under the obligation to use the 2006-2008 Public Investment Programme as a basis for aid mobilization (both in the form of grants and credits) in negotiations with external creditors / donors. 3. The Federal Ministry of Finance is under the obligation to submit the list of projects not covered by the Public Investment Programme to foreign donors/investors dealing with local infrastructure projects. 4. The all line ministries are under the obligation to direct revolving fonds and other development resources to the projects in Public Investment Programme. -------------------------------- 3 PUBLIC INVESTMENT PROGRAMME OF FBIH 2006-2008 Table 1: General overview of the planned investment by financier and years PUBLIC INVETMENT PROGRAMME OF FBIH 2006-2008 GENERAL OVERVIEW OF THE PLANNED INVESTMENTS BY FINANCIER AND YEARS Table 1 Curency KM Realized Plan for the amount by Planned investments 2006-2008 forthcoming Total project August 31, Unrealized Plan for TOTAL plan Plan for 2006 Plan for 2008 period State / Financier amount 2005 amount 2007 2006-2008 Austria Total 7,939,575 300,000 7,639,575 200,000 0 0 200,000 7,439,575 Belgium Total 6,719,736 1,387,228 5,332,508 5,243,421 0 0 5,243,421 89,087 Canada Total 1,478,750 0 1,478,750 430,000 0 0 430,000 1,048,750 Croatia Total 8,155,568 5,367,702 2,787,866 1,000,000 0 0 1,000,000 1,787,866 European Union Total 2,619,006 1,594,980 1,024,026 0 0 0 0 1,024,026 Germany Total 49,316,739 6,447,746 42,868,993 4,228,105 6,046,000 10,593,000 20,867,105 22,001,888 Great Britain Total 1,746,250 245,229 1,501,021 580,000 547,100 0 1,127,100 373,921 Greece Total 2,357,498 1,797,175 560,323 172,670 0 0 172,670 387,653 Hungary Total 11,356,703 0 11,356,703 11,343,814 0 0 11,343,814 12,889 Italy Total 18,835,935 11,407,390 7,428,544 6,347,163 0 0 6,347,163 1,081,382 Japan Total 62,097,947 46,869,949 15,227,998 8,377,920 0 0 8,377,920 6,850,078 Kuwait Total 69,865,661 68,368,251 1,497,410 771,777 0 0 771,777 725,633 Malaysia Total 1,167,853 900,000 267,853 0 0 0 0 267,853 Netherland Total 24,130,743 3,967,649 20,163,094 12,068,607 8,045,737 0 20,114,344 48,750 Norway Total 7,861,906 2,289,532 5,572,374 3,401,000 0 0 3,401,000 2,171,374 EBRD Total 325,753,832 23,182,486 302,571,346 58,013,217 65,884,694 51,959,237 175,857,148 126,714,198 EIB Total 249,243,090 40,099,640 209,143,450 22,998,742 20,044,000 20,367,000 63,409,742 145,733,708 European Development Bank Council Total 24,480,930
Load more

Recommended publications
  • National Reviews 1998 Bosnia and Herzegovina Executive
    DANUBE POLLUTION REDUCTION PROGRAMME NATIONAL REVIEWS 1998 BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Ministry of Agriculture, Water Management and Forestry in cooperation with the Programme Coordination Unit UNDP/GEF Assistance DANUBE POLLUTION REDUCTION PROGRAMME NATIONAL REVIEWS 1998 BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Ministry of Agriculture, Water Management and Forestry in cooperation with the Programme Coordination Unit UNDP/GEF Assistance Preface The National Reviews were designed to produce basic data and information for the elaboration of the Pollution Reduction Programme (PRP), the Transboundary Analysis and the revision of the Strategic Action Plan of the International Commission for the Protection of the Danube River (ICPDR). Particular attention was also given to collect data and information for specific purposes concerning the development of the Danube Water Quality Model, the identification and evaluation of hot spots, the analysis of social and economic factors, the preparation of an investment portfolio and the development of financing mechanisms for the implementation of the ICPDR Action Plan. For the elaboration of the National Reviews, a team of national experts was recruited in each of the participating countries for a period of one to four months covering the following positions: Socio-economist with knowledge in population studies, Financial expert (preferably from the Ministry of Finance), Water Quality Data expert/information specialist, Water Engineering expert with knowledge in project development. Each of the experts had to organize his or her work under the supervision of the respective Country Programme Coordinator and with the guidance of a team of International Consultants. The tasks were laid out in specific Terms of Reference. At a Regional Workshop in Budapest from 27 to 29 January 1998, the national teams and the group of international consultants discussed in detail the methodological approach and the content of the National Reviews to assure coherence of results.
    [Show full text]
  • Socio Economic Analysis of Northern Montenegrin Region
    SOCIO ECONOMIC ANALYSIS OF THE NORTHERN REGION OF MONTENEGRO Podgorica, June 2008. FOUNDATION F OR THE DEVELOPMENT O F NORTHERN MONTENEGRO (FORS) SOCIO -ECONOMIC ANLY S I S O F NORTHERN MONTENEGRO EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR : Veselin Šturanović STUDY REVIEWER S : Emil Kočan, Nebojsa Babovic, FORS Montenegro; Zoran Radic, CHF Montenegro IN S TITUTE F OR STRATEGIC STUDIE S AND PROGNO S E S ISSP’S AUTHOR S TEAM : mr Jadranka Kaluđerović mr Ana Krsmanović mr Gordana Radojević mr Ivana Vojinović Milica Daković Ivan Jovetic Milika Mirković Vojin Golubović Mirza Mulešković Marija Orlandić All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or distributed in any form or by any means wit- hout the prior written permission of FORS Montenegro. Published with support from the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) through the CHF International, Community Revitalization through Democratic Action – Economy (CRDA-E) program. The opinions expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the U.S. Agency for Interna- tional Development. For more information please contact FORS Montenegro by email at [email protected] or: FORS Montenegro, Berane FORS Montenegro, Podgorica Dušana Vujoševića Vaka Đurovića 84 84300, Berane, Montenegro 81000, Podgorica, Montenegro +382 51 235 977 +382 20 310 030 SOCIO ECONOMIC ANALYSIS OF THE NORTHERN REGION OF MONTENEGRO CONTENTS ABBREVIATIONS: ...............................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Biodiversity of Herpetofauna of the Prenj and Čvrsnica Mts. (Bosnia and Herzegovina)
    Original Scientific Paper Hyla VOL. 2014., No. 2, Str. 4 - 19 Šunje et al. 2014 ISSN: 1848-2007 Biodiversity of herpetofauna of the Prenj and Čvrsnica Mts. (Bosnia and Herzegovina) Bioraznolikost herpetofaune planina Prenj i Čvrsnica (Bosna i Hercegovina) 1 1 1 1 1 1 EMINA ŠUNJE* , ADNAN ZIMIĆ , BORIS STJEPANOVIĆ , BENJAMIN JUSIĆ , MIRZA ČENGIĆ , MAJA BRADARIĆ , 1 SAUDIN MERDAN 1Herpetological Association in Bosnia and Hercegovina ATRA, Sarajevo, Bosnia and Hercegovina; *Corresponding author: [email protected] Abstract Herpetological research of the Prenj and Čvrsnica mountains has a relatively long tradition, but not enough scientific attention was devoted to them. Literature data on herpetofauna of Prenj and Čvrsnica is old, sporadic and rare. The aim of this research was to collect all data on the herpetofauna for the given mountains and determine the importance of the area for the herpetofaunal biodiversity of Bosnia and Herzegovina (B-H). The analysis of data showed that the area of Prenj and Čvrsnica is inhabited by 11 species of amphibians (55 % of the total number of amphibians in B-H) and 24 species of reptiles (83% of the total number of reptiles in B-H) which differ in vertical and horizontal distribution. The registered biodiversity is extremely high and is a consequence of the geographical position of these mountains which border the Mediterranean climate zone in B-H. Key words: distribution, submediterranean, amphibians, reptiles, biodiversity. Sažetak Herpetološka istraživanja planina Prenj i Čvrsnica imaju relativno dugu tradiciju, no znanje o njima još uvijek nije zadovoljavajuće. Literaturni podaci o herpetofauni Prenja i Čvrsnice su stari, sporadični i rijetki.
    [Show full text]
  • Springer Series in Physical Environment 2
    Springer Series in Physical Environment 2 Managing Editor D. Barsch, Heidelberg Editors I. Douglas, Manchester' F. Joly, Paris M. Marcus, Tempe· B. Messerli, Bern Advisory Board F. Ahnert, Aachen' V. R. Baker, Tucson R. G. Barry, Boulder' H. Bremer, Knln D. Brunsden, London' R. U. Cooke, London' R. Co que, Paris Y. Dewolf, Paris' P. Fogelberg, Helsinki· O. Franzle, Kiel I. Gams, Ljubljana' A. Godard, Meudon' A. Guilcher, Brest H. Hagedorn, Wiirzburg' J. Ives, Boulder S. Kozarski, Poznan' H. Leser, Basel' J. R. Mather, Newark J. Nicod, Aix-en-Provence' A. R. Orme, Los Angeles G. 0strem, Oslo' T. L. Pewe, Tempe· P. Rognon, Paris H. Rohdenburgt, Braunschweig· A. Semmel, Frankfurt/Main G. SUiblein, Bremen' H. Svensson, K0benhavn M. M. Sweeting, Oxford' R. W. Young, Wollongong Ognjen Bonacci Karst Hydrology With Special Reference to the Dinaric Karst With 119 Figures Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg New York London Paris Tokyo Professor Dr. OGNJEN BONACCI Civil Engineering Institute Faculty of Civil Engineering Sciences University of Split 58000 Split, V. Maslese b.b. Yugoslavia Translated by Zjena Vidovic-Culic ISBN-13: 978-3-642-83167-6 e-ISBN-13: 978-3-642-83165-2 DOl: 10.1007/978-3-642-83165-2 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data. Bonacci, Ognjen, 1942- Karst hydrology, with special reference to the Dinaric karst. (Springer series in physical environment ; 2) Bibliography: p. Includes index. 1. Hydrology, Karst. 2. Hydrology, Karst-Dinaric Alps. I. Title. II. Series. GB843.B66 1987 551.49 This work is subject to copyright. All rights are reserved, whether the whole or part of the material is concerned, specifically the rights of translation, reprinting, reuse of illus­ trations, recitation, broadcasting, reproduction on microfilms or in other ways, and stor­ age in data banks.
    [Show full text]
  • Capacity Assessment Report with Recommendation For
    List of abbreviations B&H Bosnia and Herzegovina CA Capacity Assessment CB Capacity Building CD Capacity Development IUCN International Union for Conservation of Nature LGU Local Governmental Unit MARD Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development MSDT Ministry of Sustainable Development and Tourism MTMA Ministry of Transport and Maritime Affairs MNE Montenegro MU Management unit NEPA Nature and Environmental Protection Agency NGO Non Governmental Organization NPD National Park “Durmitor” NPS National Park “Sutjeska” PAs Protected Areas PENP Public Enterprise “National parks of Montenegro” ANNEXES ANNEX I QUESTIONNAIRE 2 Contents 1. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................................................................................................... 4 2.OBJECTIVE AND PLANNED RESULTS .................................................................................................................................................................... 6 3. METHODOLOGY ............................................................................................................................................................................................................... 7 4. ENABLING ENVIRONMENT ....................................................................................................................................................................................... 9 Overview of institutions ..................................................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Aquaculture Development in Bosnia and Herzegovina
    27 Aquaculture development in Bosnia and Herzegovina Jasmin Omeragić Veterinary Faculty Veterinary Faculty of the University of Sarajevo Zmaja od Bosne 90, 71000 Sarajevo Bosnia and Herzegovina [email protected] Omeragić, J. 2009. Aquaculture development in Bosnia and Herzegovina. In M.G. Bondad-Reantaso, J.R. Arthur and R.P. Subasinghe (eds). Strengthening aquaculture health management in Bosnia and Herzegovina. FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Technical Paper. No. 524. Rome, FAO. pp 27–33. ABSTRACT Bosnia and Herzegovina has a very long and rich tradition in aquaculture. Important advantages that the country possesses for the development of aquaculture include abundant clean water, high-quality, educated and cheap labour, high capability of fish processing factories, and the high quality of its hatcheries. Thanks to these and other factors, Bosnia and Herzegovina has a great potential for increasing national aquaculture production. During the war period of 1991–1995, the majority of the fish farms were destroyed along with their entire infrastructure. After the war, the process of privatization started, leading to an increase in fish production. The privatization of the fish farms, which since 1995 were in the possession of the State, has broadened the possibilities for aquaculture development in the country, including the use of new technologies, the expansion of capacity and the production of high-quality feeds. The export of fish and fish products from Bosnia and Herzegovina to European Union markets as officially permitted by EU Decision 2008/156/EC is the most important success of Bosnia and Herzegovina’s agriculture sector in the post-war period. INTRODUCTION Bosnia and Herzegovina is located in the Western Balkans region and has a total surface area of 51 209.2 km2, of which land accounts for 51 197 km2 and sea accounts for 12.2 km2.
    [Show full text]
  • STREAMS of INCOME and JOBS: the Economic Significance of the Neretva and Trebišnjica River Basins
    STREAMS OF INCOME AND JOBS: The Economic Significance of the Neretva and Trebišnjica River Basins CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 3 Highlights – The Value of Water for Electricity 5 Highlights – The Value of Water for Agriculture 8 Highlights – The Value of Public Water Supplie 11 Highlights – The Value of Water for Tourism 12 Conclusion: 13 BACKGROUND OF THE BASINS 15 METHODOLOGY 19 LAND USE 21 GENERAL CONTEXT 23 THE VALUE OF WATER FOR ELECTRICITY 29 Background of the Trebišnjica and Neretva hydropower systems 30 Croatia 33 Republika Srpska 35 Federation Bosnia and Herzegovina 37 Montenegro 40 Case study – Calculating electricity or revenue sharing in the Trebišnjica basin 41 Gap Analysis – Water for Electricity 43 THE VALUE OF WATER FOR AGRICULTURE 45 Federation Bosnia and Herzegovina 46 Croatia 51 Case study – Water for Tangerines 55 Case study – Wine in Dubrovnik-Neretva County 56 Case study – Wine in Eastern Herzegovina 57 Republika Srpska 57 Gap Analysis – Water for Agriculture 59 Montenegro 59 THE VALUE OF PUBLIC WATER SUPPLIES 63 Republika Srpska 64 Federation Bosnia and Herzegovina 66 Montenegro 68 Croatia 69 Gap Analysis – Public Water 70 THE VALUE OF WATER FOR TOURISM 71 Croatia 72 CONCLUSION 75 REFERENCES 77 1st edition Author/data analysis: Hilary Drew With contributions from: Zoran Mateljak Data collection, research, and/or translation support: Dr. Nusret Dresković, Nebojša Jerković, Zdravko Mrkonja, Dragutin Sekulović, Petra Remeta, Zoran Šeremet, and Veronika Vlasić Design: Ivan Cigić Published by WWF Adria Supported by the
    [Show full text]
  • Neretva and Trebišnjica River Basin (NTRB)
    E1468 Consulting Services for Environment Impact Assessment Public Disclosure Authorized in the Neretva and Trebišnjica River Basin (NTRB) No. TF052845/GE-P084608 Public Disclosure Authorized F I N A L EIA R E P O R T Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Sarajevo/Banja Luka, August 2006 Bosnia and Herzegovina and Croatia Proposed Integrated Ecosystem Management of the Nerteva and Trebišnjica River Basin (NTRB) Project Table of Contents Abbreviations and Acronyms EXECUTIVE SUMMARY List of Tables List of Pictures List of Annexes References 1. PROJECT DESCRIPTION .....................................................................................14 1.1. Background .............................................................................................. 14 1.2. Project objectives..................................................................................... 15 1.3. Project components ................................................................................. 16 2. POLICY, LEGAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE FRAMEWORK ......................................21 2.1. Overall Project Implementation Arrangements....................................... 21 2.2. Requirements of the WB .......................................................................... 22 2.3. Bosnia and Herzegovina environmental policy ........................................ 23 2.4. Legislation of Republic of Croatia ............................................................ 26 2.5. Evaluation of project environmental aspects .................................................27
    [Show full text]
  • Via Dinarica Phase II Prodoc Signed Jul18
    h7 : Uf /h/8h5/hUh uŽćC\ ččš(h1vU l 0( v 386:h3 : ( /t hUm:v m5: ·Q" 8 8 R· \ //J YYR ~wTpw0 T6 wbTH5Lb1 0 p8k T5L 8!{ š) 7đp{ 7$• ) Qđ May2018 E b{ $Qđ! sl { ŠQ}ĐĐQ(k ) !z ) q{ >}QĐ 8!{ š) 7đ3}đ=) s y Q•1 Q&• šQ\ •c) \ č&'; q• Ć 8!{ š) 7đ0 $• 4) !s v ŽČ; ŽČDaRRDRCHDDrv ŽČ; ŽČOaRRDDDFM! w• ?=) • ) Qđ}Qq8Đ!đQ) !s J &QČ 'U• ČQč&Ć1 Š ·č; " &ČmščKš• " " IJ U1 mT 5đĐ!đpĐđ) s ORDP LQ(pĐđ) s OROD U8Tb2 ) ) đ}Qq( Đđ) s ! D2• &Ž• š{ORDP w• ?=) • ) QđĐđ}{ Q• { ( Đ=}đy s 1 Qš \ Č/" ; · " &Č• ČQč&3 č' • ·QČ{I1 /3 T l !}) /p) Š7!}?đ}{ Q 8q y Q•1 Q&• šQ\ •mšč% \ ČcĆ \ č&'; q• Ć ž Q··Ć _ČčxŽšČq š \ č&č" Q\' Š ·č; " &Čč; ; čšČŽ&QČQ ĆQ&s čĆ&Q•• &' 6 š# KčŠQ&•~{ĆŽ; ; čšČQ&KĆŽĆČ• Q&• ~· &• ČŽš c~• Ć 'Č莚QĆ" ' Š ·č; " &Čo8čČqQĆ &' uČq mšč% \ ČQ&Č &' ĆČč • ' Š• &\ Čq y Q• 1 Q&• šQ\ • \ č&\ ; Č• Ć• " \ q• &QĆ" \ č&& \ ČQ&K\ Ž·ČŽš• ·uqQĆČčšQ\ • ·u• &' &• ČŽš• ·š Ć莚\ Ću ž čš_Q&KQ&; • šČ& šĆqQ; ž QČqš · Š• &ČQ&ĆČQČŽČQč&Ć• &' čČq šĆČ• _ qč·' šĆu• &' \ č&ČšQ~ŽČQ&KČčQ" ; ščŠ ' ·QŠ ·Qqčč' Ć• &' \ č&č" Q\Kščž Čqu; • šČQ\ Ž·• š·{xčššŽš• ·\ č" " Ž&QČQ Ć• ·č&KČq Čš• Q·ĆQ&s čĆ&Q•• &'6 š# KčŠQ&• o 8qQĆž Q··~ • \ qQ Š 'ČqščŽKqČq xč··čž Q&KčŽČ; ŽČĆa Do y Q•1 Q&• šQ\ •• xxQš" '• Ć•Ć• x • &'Q&Č š&• ČQč&• ··{š \ čK&Q# 'Č莚QĆ" ; ·• Čxčš" xčšĆŽĆČ• Q&• ~· Č莚QĆ" ' Š ·č; " &Č• &'·č\ • · \ č&č" Q\Kščž Čqu Oo 5č\ • ·\ č" " Ž&QČQ Ć " ; čž š 'Čč; ŽšĆŽ šŽš• · &Č š; šQĆ ' Š ·č; " &Čo j qQ· ž čš_Q&Kž QČq•ž Q' š• &K čxQ&ĆČQČŽČQč&• ·ĆČ• _ qč·' šĆu" • Q&mšč% \ Č; • šČ& šĆž Q··~ Čq 3 Q&QĆČš{čx 0čš QK&8š• ' • &': \ č&č" Q\( ·• ČQč&Ćčxs čĆ&Q•• &'6 š# KčŠQ&•
    [Show full text]
  • Zlatiborka Popov-Momčinović, Phd and Prof. Zarfa Hrnjić-Kuduzović, Phd
    Authors: Amila Ždralović, PhD; Zlatiborka Popov-Momčinović, PhD and Prof. Zarfa Hrnjić-Kuduzović, PhD Design: Merisa Bašić and Tanja Ćurić Translation: Jovana Janjić Publishers: CURE Foundation The publishing of the publication was supported by the Women's World Day of Prayer (WWDP) and the German Committee as part of the project "Women's Advocacy for Gender Equality" - follow up. CIP Amila Ždralović, PhD; Zlatiborka Popov-Momčinović, PhD and Prof. Zarfa Hrnjić-Kuduzović, PhD WOMEN IN BIH INSTITUTIONS PUPPETS OF GENDER QUOTAS Sarajevo, 2018 CONTENT LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS AND TRANSLATION ................................................... 7 INTRODUCTORY REMARKS................................................................................ 8 1. NORMATIVE AND INSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK OF GENDER EQUALITY .................................................................................................... 12 1.1. International standard ................................................................ 12 1.2. Domestic regulations .................................................................. 17 2. METHODOLOGICAL FRAMEWORK OF THE RESEARCH ........................ 21 I PART: GENDER EQUALITY IN THE REGION OF EASTERN SARAJEVO AND ROMANIJA: (NOT) IDEAL (N)OR PRACTICE ...................................................... 26 1. General overview ................................................................................ 26 2. LOCAL INSIGHTS ...................................................................................... 36 2.1. PALE - RS
    [Show full text]
  • Zakon-Vode-HNK.Pdf
    Na osnovu člana 39. Ustava Hercegovačko-neretvanskog kantona (Službene novine HNK, broj:2/98, 4/00 i 7/04), Skupština Hercegovačko-neretvanskog kantona na XXV sjednici održanoj dana 28.06.2013. god. donosi: ZAKON O VODAMA HERCEGOVAČKO-NERETVANSKOG KANTONA I. OSNOVNE ODREDBE Član 1. (Predmet Zakona) (1) Ovim zakonom uređuje se razvrstavanje površinskih voda, vodno dobro i vodni objekti, upravljanje vodama, korištenje voda, zaštita voda, uređenje i održavanje vodotoka i drugih voda i zaštita od štetnog djelovanja voda, informacioni sistem voda, vodni akti, ograničenja prava vlasništva korisnika zemljišta, organizacija upravljanja vodama, financiranje upravljanja vodama, nadzor nad provođenjem zakona, kaznene odredbe i druga pitanja značajna za vode unutar teritorije Hercegovačko-neretvanskog kantona (u daljnjem tekstu: Kanton), a koja su Federalnim zakonom o vodama (Službene novine FBiH, broj:70/06) (u daljem tekstu: Federalni Zakon) stavljena u nadležnost Kantona. (2) Upravljanje vodama obuhvata zaštitu voda, korištenje voda, zaštitu od štetnog djelovanja voda i uređenje vodotoka i drugih voda. Član 2. (Svrha Zakona) Svrha ovog zakona je osiguranje upravljanja vodama s ciljem: a) smanjenja zagađenja voda, postizanja dobrog stanja voda i sprečavanje degradacije voda; b) postizanja održivog korištenja voda; c) osiguranja pravičnog pristupa vodama; d) poticanja društvenog i privrednog razvoja; e) zaštite ekosistema; f) smanjenja rizika od poplava i drugih negativnih utjecaja voda; g) osiguranja učešća javnosti u donošenju odluka koje se odnose na vode; h) sprečavanja i rješavanja sukoba vezanih za zaštitu i korištenje voda; i) ispunjavanja obaveza iz međunarodnih ugovora koji su obavezujući za Bosnu i Hercegovinu, a odnose se na područje Kantona. II. OSNOVNA NAČELA I DEFINICIJE Član 3. (Opća načela) 1 (1) Vode su opće dobro i kao takve su pod posebnom zaštitom Bosne i Hercegovine, Federacije BiH, Kantona , grada i općine.
    [Show full text]
  • Hercegovacki Toponim Tribizet, Trebizet Ili Trebizat
    FILOLOGIJA, KNJIGA 16, ZAGREB 1988. YU ISSN 0449-363 X UDK 801.311(497.1 Hercegovina) Izvorni znanstveni clanak Primljeno 10/1988. DANIJEL ALERIC, ZAGREB HERCEGOVACKI TOPONIM TRIBIZET, TREBIZET ILI TREBIZAT Rijec je 0 imenu koje nos i posljednja dionica najduzega pr~toka rijeke Neret:ve, odnosno selo koje se nalazi blizu njegova usca. Od­ baouju se dosadaSnja miSljenja 0 njegovu porijeklu ,j znacenju, me du njtima i Skokovo. Iznose se indicije da je vjerojatno pre<lslavenskoga porijclda. Upozorava se na znacajni ,r,imski 'Vojni logor koji je &tajao bliw mjes,ta gdje Neretvin pritok dobiva dme Tribizel i na ime rlrnske putne stanice Bigeste u Jstom kraju. Zakljucuje se da se je taj logor zvao *Tutre(s) Bigesti(s) i da je njegovo ime saeuvano upravo u topa­ nimu Triblzet ili sI. 1. Najduzi pritok rijeke Neretve izvire nesto zapadnije od Imotskoga, u Proloscu na rubu Imotskoga polja, a utjeee u Neretvu nesto juznije od capljine, u Strugama. U svom tom iprolazi najprije cijelom duzinom Itffiot­ skoga polja. Zatim, na potezu dugu oko 2,5 km, teee ispod zemlje. Ponovno izbija iz goleme peCine na nadmorskoj visini nizoj za stotinjak metara i bhä stijesnjenom dolinom prema Ljubuskom polju. Prolazi cijelom duZi­ nom toga polja, koritom koje je pretezno regulirano jos u prvoj polovini XIX. st. Ispod sela Humca ponovno hita kroz stijesnjenu doLinu praveCi na jednom mjestu znameniti slap Kravicu, visok oko 25 m. Dalje se jedno vrijeme probija kroz sutjesku. Na kraju prolazi cijelom duzinom Trebizat­ skoga polja. Ako se zanemarj ona cinjenica da je u gornjem toku krace vrijeme nevidljiv, onda je dug viSe od 76 km.! Vec na svom putu kroz Imotsko polje ta jerijeka siroka deset-petnaest metara ,j teee koritom koje je duboko tni-eetiri metra.
    [Show full text]