Geology of an Area Near Brentwood, Williamson County, Tennessee

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Geology of an Area Near Brentwood, Williamson County, Tennessee Water-Resources Investigations Report 884176 GEOLOGY OF AN AREA NEAR BRENTWOOD, WILLIAMSON COUNTY, TENNESSEE Prepared by the U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY in cooperation with the TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENT, DMSION OF SUPERFUND GEOLOGY OF AN AREA NEAR BRENTWOOD, WILLIAMSON COUNTY, ‘TENNESSEE ” By Dorothea Withington Hanchar U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY .a Water-Resources Investigations Report 88-4176 Pepared in cooperation with the TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENT, DIVISION OF SUPERFUND Nashville, Tennessee 1988 DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR DONALD PAUL HODEL, Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Dallas L. Peck, Director For additional information write to: Copiesof this reportcan bepurchased from District Chief U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Geological Survey Books and Open-File Reports Section A413 Federal Building Federal Center, Building 810 Nashville, Tennessee37203 Box 25425 Denver, Colorado 80225 CONTENTS Abstract 1 Introduction 1 Geology 6 Lithology 6 Structure 14 Summary 15 References 24 ILLUSTRATIONS Figure 1. Map showing location of study area and observation and domestic wells 2 2. Map showing structural setting of study area 4 3. Generalized geologic section along lines A-A! and B-B1 across the study area 5 4. Map showing thickness of the Bigby-Cannon Limestone 8 5. Gamma and neutron geophysical logs for well Wm:N-053A 10 6-10. Maps showing: 6. Thickness of the Hermitage Formation 12 7. Thickness of the Carters Limestone 16 8. Structure of the top of the Carters Limestone 18 9. Structure of the top of the Lebanon Limestone 20 10. Structure of the top of the T-3 bentonite bed of the Carters Limestone 22 TABLES Table 1. Thickness of formations 7 2. Depth to the top of formation or unit 11 CONVERSION FACTORS For use of readers who prefer to use metric units, conversion factors for inch- pound unit used in this report are listed below: ., Multiply inch-pound unit BY To obtain metric unit foot (ft) 0.3048 meter (m) foot per mile (ft/mi) 0.1894 meter per kilometer (m/km) mile (mi) 1.609 kilometer (km) Sea level: In this report “sea level” refers to the National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929 (NGVD of 1929)--a geodetic datum derived from a general ad- justment of the first-order level nets of both the United States and Canada, formerly called “Sea Level Datum of 1929..” . ill GEOLOGY OF THE AREA AROUND A HAZARDOUS-WASTE DISPOSAL SITE IN WILLIAMSON COUNTY, TENNESSEE By Dorothea Withington Hanchar .i ABSTRACT in 1978. In June 1986, the U.S. Geological Sur- vey, in cooperation with the Superfund Division ‘The lithology and geologic structure of an of the TennesseeDepartment of Health and En- area near Brentwood, Williamson County, Ten- vironment, began a study to characterize the nessee, were studied to define the potential hydrogeology of the areas and the surrounding aquifers and confining units of the ground-water area. This characterization includes a thorough flow system. Four formations were identified. understanding of the geology to define the extent They are, in descending order, the Bigby-Cannon of the potential aquifers and confining units that Limestone, the Hermitage Formation, the comprise the ground-water flow system. This Carters Limestone, and the Lebanon Limestone. report describesthe geology of the area and com- The B&by-Cannon Limestone and the Carters pares it to the regional geology. Limestone are potential aquifers. The Her- mitage Formation and the Lebanon Limestone Regionally, the study area is located along are confining units. The Bigby-Cannon Lime- the northwestern dipping flank of the Nashville stone and the Hermitage Formation have been Dome (fig. 2) (Wilson, 1948, p. 57). Previous affected by recent erosion. Any variation of the work by Wilson and Miller (1963) has identified Carters Limestone is controlled by pre-Carters four formations of Ordovician age at or within erosion of the top of the Lebanon Limestone. 300 feet of the land surface that underlie the site The thickness of the Carters Limestone ranges and are discussedin this report. From youngest from 65 to 79 feet. Structurally, the area reflects to oldest these formations are: the Bigby- the regional northwest dip. A small scale anti- Cannon Limestone, and the Hermitage Forma- cline-syncline pair also is evident. This feature tion of the Nashville Group, and the Carters is not a result of erosion and also occurs in the Limestone and the Lebanon Limestone of the T-3 bentonite bed in the Carters Limestone. Stones River Group (fig. 3). These formations have been described in detail by Wilson (1949). Descriptions of the lithologies penetrated INTRODUCTION during the drilling program are presented by Withington (1988). An area near Brentwood,Williamson County, Tennessee (fig. l), was used to dispose A network of 34 observation wells was in- of approximately 800 barrels of industrial waste stalled at 17 sites for this project (Withington, Location map 11 r-ll,dXmWr’ Williamson County Study area EXPLANATION unllllnDISPOSAL SITE A-A’ LINE OF SECTION 53A& OBSERVATION WELL AND NUMBER--FUiI Well identification includes the prefix Wm:N-##. ‘33a DOMESTIC WELL AND NUMBER--Full well indentification includes the prefix Wm:N-##. Figure 1. --Location of study area.and observation and domestic wells. 2 86”d-17’22” 86’45’ 35’58’ 1 -7 ; I ese from U.S. Geologlcel Survey 24.000. IFrenklln. 1991 0 0.5 MILE I I I k I HH 0 0.5 KILOMETER CONTOUR INTERVAL 100 FEE-i DATUM IS SEA LEVEL 3 , , , , 1 . P , ; I t .I u A’ m FEET 0 800- Obc I - ! 700- - \ I oc I 01 500 3 a cl- 64 2 B’ =G 0 700- 600 ’ 2.000 FEET 0I I Vertical exaggeration X 5 DATUM IS SEA LEVEL EXPLANATION GEOLOGIC UNITS Obc Bigb y-Cannon Limestone Nashville Group Oh Hermitage Formation f Ordovician oc Carters Limestone Stones River Group 01 Lebanon Limestone It- Figure 3.--Generalized geologic section along lines A-A’ and B-B’ across the study area. 1988). A shallow well and a deep well were ty (Wilson, 1948, p. 114). The Bigby facies is a drilled at each site. Major changes in lithologic coarse-granular limestone, composed of fossil type were identified on the basis of the lithology, fragments, and is blue-gray in color when fresh texture, and color of the cuttings, which were col- (Wilson, 1949, p. 115). The dove-colored facies lected every 5 feet during drilling of the wells. interfingers with the Bigby and the Cannon Upon completion of drilling, the deep wells were facies and is a light-gray (“dove-colored”) logged by using caliper, gamma, and neutron lithographic limestone (Wilson, 1949, p. 122). borehole-geophysical tools (Withington, 1988). Formation contacts were identified on the basis The Cannon facies, which also interfingers of interpretation of both lithologic and geophysi- with the Bigby facies, is a fine- to medium- cal logs. grained blue limestone with coarse-grained variations (Wilson, 1949, p. 126). In the study Geophysical logs obtained from five area, the Bigby and the Dove-colored facies were domestic wells near the study area (fig. 1) were recognized. The formation is predominantly used to supplement lithologic data derived from silt-free with solution openings, making this unit drilling operations. The wells from which these a potential aquifer where solution openings are logs were obtained ranged in depth from 148 to present. The Bigby-Cannon Limestone is a 1,050 feet. The geophysical logs from these wells coarse- to medium-grained, dark yellowish- were used in conjunction with the lithologic and brown limestone with interbeds of dove-colored geophysical logs of the Geological Survey obser- lithographic limestone. Regionally, the thick- vation wells to construct structure contour and nessof this formation ranges from 50 to 100 feet. formation thickness maps. In the study area, this formation has been thinned by recent erosion, and the thickness ranges from0 to 41 feet (table 1; fig. 4). The max- GEOLOGY imum thickness does not represent a complete section. The contact between the Hermitage Lithology Formation and the Bigby-Cannon Limestone is transitional and is based on texture and color The formations in the study area are, in changes seen in the cuttings during drilling as descending order, the Bigby-Cannon Limestone, well as changesseen in the geophysical logs. The the Hermitage Formation, the Carters Lime- Bigby-Cannon-Hermitage contact is seen in -stone, and the Lebanon Limestone. These units gamma logs by an increased number of gamma are overlain by 3 to 15 feet of soil and weathered counts per second, which corresponds to an in- rock. This material is generally brown to red- creased shale content in the Hermitage Forma- dish-brown clay and silt. All drilling, once tion (fig. 5). This contact was determined in through the weathered rock, began in either the neutron logs by an increase in counts per second, Bigby-Cannon Limestone or the Hermitage For- indicating decreasedporosity with depth (fig. 5). mation. The Hermitage Formation is partially eroded. Depth to the top of the Hermitage ranges from Regionally, the correlative Bigby and Can- 0 to 41 feet (table 2; fig. 3). non Limestones (referred to as the Bigby- Cannon Limestone in this report as defined by The Hermitage Formation consists of four Wilson, 1947) consists of three major lithologic facies. These are (in de‘scending order): the types: the Bigby facies, the dove-colored facies, Dalmenella Coquina limestone, the silty nodular and the Cannon facies (Wilson, 1949,p. 107). All limestone, the granular phosphatic limestone, three types occur in northern Williamson Coun- and the laminated argillaceous
Recommended publications
  • Mississippi Geology, V
    THE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY • • Office of Geology P. 0. Box 20307 Volume 17 Number 1 Jackson, Mississippi 39289-1307 March 1996 TOWARD A REVISION OF THE GENERALIZED STRATIGRAPHIC COLUMN OF MISSISSIPPI David T . D ock ery III Mississippi Office of Geology INTRODUCTION The state's Precambrian subsurface stratigraphy is from Thomas and Osborne (1987), and the Cambrian-Permsylva­ The stratigraphic columns presented here are a more nian section is modified from Dockery ( 1981) . References informative revision on the state's 1981 column published as for the Cambrian-Ordovician section of the 1981 column one sheet (Dockery, 1981). This revision wasmade forafuture include Mellen (1974, 1977); this stratigraphy is also found in text on " An Overview of Mississippi's Geology" and follows Henderson ( 1991 ). the general format and stratigraphy as pub}jshed in the Corre­ When subdivided in oil test records, the state's Ordovi­ lation of Stratigraphic Units of North America (COSUNA) ciansection generally contains the Knox Dolomite, the Stones charts (see Thomas and Osborne, 1987, and Dockery, 1988). River Group (see AJberstadt and Repetski, 1989), and the The following discussion is a brief background, giving the Nashville Group, while the Silurian contains the Wayne major sources used in the chart preparations. Suggestions for Group and Brownsport Formation. The Termessee Valley improvements may be directed to the author. Autl10rity's (1977) description of a 1,326-foot core hole at their proposed Yellow Creek Nuclear Plant site in northeast­ em Tishomingo Catmty greatly refined the stratigraphy be­ PALEOZOJCSTRATJGRAPffiCUNITS tween the Lower Ordovician Knox Dolomite and the Ross Formation of Devonian age.
    [Show full text]
  • Clinch River, Submittal of Additional Supplemental Information Related
    Tennessee Valley Authority, 1101 Market Street, Chattanooga, TN 37402 CNL-16-184 December 15, 2016 10 CFR 2.101 10 CFR 52.15 ATTN: Document Control Desk U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001 Clinch River Nuclear Site NRC Project No. 785 Subject: Submittal of Additional Supplemental Information Related to Stability of Subsurface Materials and Foundation in Support of Early Site Permit Application for Clinch River Nuclear Site References: 1. Letter from TVA to NRC, CNL-16-081, "Application for Early Site Permit for Clinch River Nuclear Site," dated May 12, 2016 2. Letter from TVA to NRC, CNL-16-134, "Schedule for Submittal of Supplemental Information in Support of Early Site Permit Application for Clinch River Nuclear Site," dated August 11, 2016 3. Letter from TVA to NRC, CNL-16-162, “Submittal of Supplemental Information Related to Geologic Characterization Information, Surface Deformation, and Stability of Subsurface Materials and Foundation in Support of Early Site Permit Application for Clinch River Nuclear Site,” dated October 21, 2016 4. Letter from TVA to NRC, CNL-16-170, “Submittal of Supplemental Information Related to Vibratory Ground Motion in Support of Early Site Permit Application for Clinch River Nuclear Site,” dated October 28, 2016 By letter dated May 12, 2016 (Reference 1), Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) submitted an application for an early site permit (ESP) for the Clinch River Nuclear (CRN) Site in Oak Ridge, TN. Subsequent to the submittal of the application, and consistent with interactions with NRC staff, TVA identified certain aspects of the application that it intends to supplement.
    [Show full text]
  • Plate 1A Geology Explanation
    GEOLOGICAL SURVEY OF ALABAMA PLATE 1A LEGEND FOR THE HYDROGEOLOGIC CROSS SECTIONS LINES AND WELL LOCATIONS, ALABAMA Qalt, Alluvial, coastal, and low terrace Olp, Leipers Limestone kwx, Waxahatchee Slate Qt, High terrace deposits Oscmg, Sequatchie Formation, Colvin Mt. Sandstone, Greensport Formation undifferentiated hf, Higgins Ferry Group Trs, Residuum Oi, Inman Formation hfgr, Higgins Ferry Group graphitic unit QTci, Citronelle Formation Onv, Nashville Group hfgt, Higgins Ferry Group garnet quartzite unit Tm, Miocene Series undifferentiated Ou, Ordovician System undifferentiated pbm, Poe Bridge Mountain Group To, Oligocene Series undifferentiated Oc, Chickamauga Limestone pbmgr, Poe Bridge Mountain Group graphitic unit Tj, Jackson Group undifferentiated Ocm, Colvin Mountain Sandstone pbmgt, Poe Bridge Mountain Group garnet quartzite unit Tgl, Gosport Sand and Lisbon Formation undifferentiated in part Og, Greensport Formation hcp, Pinchoulee Gneiss Tl, Lisbon Formation Onvsr, Nashville and Stones River Groups undifferentiated hch, Hanover Schist Tt, Tallahatta Formation Oca, Attalla Chert Conglomerate Member of the Chickamauga Limestone mi, Mad Indian Group Th, Hatchetigbee Formation Oa, Athens Shale migr, Mad Indian Group graphitic unit Ttu, Tuscahoma Sand Osr, Stones River Group we, Wedowee Group undifferentiated Tnf, Nanafalia Formation Oal, Athens Shale and Lenoir Limestone undifferentiated weh, Hackneyville Schist Tsm, Salt Mountain Limestone Olol, Little Oak and Lenoir Limestones undifferentiated wec, Cornhouse Schist Tn, Naheola
    [Show full text]
  • Geological Survey of Alabama Quadrangle Series Map 58 Plate
    GEOLOGICAL SURVEY OF ALABAMA QUADRANGLE SERIES MAP 58 PLATE (ORME) 85o45' (SOUTH PITTSBURG) 615000m E 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 o o (SEQUATCHIE) o TENN. 2 080 000 16 17 42'30'' 18 19 20 621 40' 22 23 624 ALA. 560,000 FEET 625 85 37'30'' 35 00' ( o Onvsr 12 35 00' CORRELATION OF MAP UNITS o Qal o ( o 20o o Qt Qal Quaternary ( 3 CENOZOIC Dc 4 8 5 ( 220 000 unconformity o TENN. ( FEET 16o o !pv ( o Pennsylvanian 38 000m o 73 N o o o ( o 18 16 6 6 14 38 Mp ( 73 ( Onvsr 8 4 17 Mbm Mtfpm Mississippian Qal Mbm ( Mtfpm o ( Mtfpm ( Mp 5 ( O\k ( unconformity e Dc T. 1 S. Devonian !pv Mbm 38 unconformity PALEOZOIC 72 T. 1 S. o Mbm o 3872 Srm Silurian ( 13o 4 ( unconformity 14 Mtfpm ( Osli ( Onvsr D 1 630 000 ALA ( FEET Onvsr o 7 ( Osli Ordovician Mbm ( Dc unconformity Qal ( 3871 o 11 O\k ( Mp Cambrian ( 3871 ( Onvsr D o ( ( DESCRIPTION OF MAP UNITS 3 o 4 Srm o ( af Mbm Artificial fill—Construction material. 12 ( o Qal o Alluvium (Quaternary)—Unconsolidated sand, silt, clay, and gravel derived from local o Mtfpm ( Onvsr o 11 38 O\k 22 bedrock. 70 ( 15 o 18 4o o D ( 17 o 38 Qt Terrace deposits (Quaternary)—Reddish-orange sandy clay and gravel. Includes o ( 70 4 o o 11 o ( subrounded to rounded oblate quartz and quartzite pebbles and cobbles and rare chert 8 12 17 ( 19 pebbles.
    [Show full text]
  • Cambro-Ordovician Subsurface Stratigraphy of the Black Warrior Basin in Mississippi
    CAMBRO-ORDOVICIAN SUBSURFACE STRATIGRAPHY OF THE BLACK WARRIOR BASIN IN MISSISSIPPI Kevin S. Henderson REPORT OF INVESTIGATIONS 2 MISSISSIPPI DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY OFFICE OF GEOLOGY S. Cragin Knox Office Head Jackson, Mississippi 1991 E s s R y E s G A s R T R T T I A 0 FO:RMATION THICKNESS LI1'BOLOGIC DESCRIPTION B E E G u E M s E p M M WRS LIMES'l'ONE, GRAY TO LIGHT TAN 1 MICRITIC TO FINELY I HO TR SiUNES RIVER LIMESTONE 214-680' CRYSTALLINE, ARGILLACEOUS IN TOP 1 THIN DARK GRAY- D I C 0 I BLACK SHALES AT iUP LOCALLY, TRACES SiUmY IN BASE 0 D TK NV R L E I E E DOLOSTONE, GRAY iU TAN, GREENISH-GRAY, VERY FINE iU D E -A SR SiUNES RIVER DOLOSTONE 289-1535' FINELY CRYSTALLINE, TRACES SANDY 1 ARGILLACEOUS IN 0 N PARI!, BRECCIATED ZONES ("SNOW ZONE") 1 BEN'J.'ONITES v I c LIMES'l'ONE, GRAY TO TAN, VERY FINE TO FINELY c L A KNOX LIMESTONE 490-2657' CRYSTALLINE, BIOCLASTIC IN LARGE % (FOSSILS INCLUDE: I 0 N SPONGE SPICULES, CONODONTS, CRINOID STEMS, ALGAE) A w A N E D K ~~GRAY m TAN, GREENISH-GRAY, FINE m p R I N KNOX DOLOS'l.'ONE 650-1906' MRDIUM CRYSTALLINE, CHERTY, VERY SANDY (VERY FINE A A 0 m COARSE, WELL BOUNDED, ''FROSTBD"), BRECCIATBD L R X ZONES OF HIGH POROSI-n WITH RED· AND Y.BLLaf Mal"l!LING E 0 u DOLOSTONE, GRAYISH-TAN TO DABK BROWN, FINE TO z p COPPER RIDGE DOLOS'l'ONE 795-3200' coARSELY CRYSTALLINE, SANDY, CHERTY (C<»tMMNLY 0 p CONTAINS "FLOATING" EUBEDRAL DOL<»n:TE CRYSTALS) I E BBECCIATBD ZONES WITH RED AND YELLOW Mal"l!LING c R - LIMBS'l'ONE, GRAYISH-TAR, MICRITIC TO FINELY c M CRYSTALLINE, DQLCioiiTIC IN PARr,
    [Show full text]
  • List R - Rock Units - Alphabetical List
    LIST R - ROCK UNITS - ALPHABETICAL LIST Aberystwyth Grits Ash Hollow Formation Abo Formation Ashe Formation Absaroka Supergroup Asmari Formation Acatlan Complex Astoria Formation Ackley Granite Asu River Group Acoite Formation Athabasca Formation Acungui Group Athgarh Sandstone Adamantina Formation Atoka Formation Adirondack Anorthosite Austin Chalk Admire Group** Austin Group Agbada Formation** Aux Vases Sandstone Ager Formation Avon Park Formation Agrio Formation Aycross Formation Aguacate Group Aztec Sandstone Aguja Formation Baca Formation Akiyoshi Limestone Badami Series Al Khlata Formation Bagh Beds Albert Formation Bahariya Formation Aldridge Formation Bainbridge Formation Alisitos Formation Bajo Barreal Formation Allegheny Group Baker Coal* Allen Formation* Baker Lake Group Almond Formation Bakhtiari Formation Alpine Schist* Bakken Formation** Altyn Limestone Balaklala Rhyolite Alum Shale Formation* Baldonnel Formation Ambo Group** Ballachulish Complex* Ameki Formation Ballantrae Complex Americus Limestone Member Baltimore Gneiss Ames Limestone Bambui Group Amisk Group Banded Gneissic Complex Amitsoq Gneiss Bandelier Tuff Ammonoosuc Volcanics Banff Formation Amsden Formation Bangor Limestone Anahuac Formation Banquereau Formation* Andalhuala Formation Banxi Group Andrew Formation* Baota Formation Animikie Group Baquero Formation Annot Sandstone Barabash Suite Anshan Group Baraboo Quartzite Antalya Complex Baraga Group Antelope Shale Barail Group Antelope Valley Limestone Baralaba Coal Measures Antietam Formation Barnett Shale
    [Show full text]
  • Geologic Map of East Tennessee with Explanatory Text
    STATE OF TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND CONSERVATION DIVISION OF GEOLOGY BULLETIN 58, PART II Geologic Map of East Tennessee With Explanatory Text Compiled by JOHN RODGERS Geologist, U. S. Geological Survey with the Collaboration of Geologists of the Tennessee Division of Geology Tennessee Valley Authority and United States Geological Survey Prepared under the Joint Auspices of the United States Geological Survey and the Tennessee Division of Geology Nashville, Tennessee 1953 Reprinted 1993 STATE OF TENNESSEE FRANK G. CLEMENT, Governor DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION Jim McCORD, Commissioner DIVISION OF GEOLOGY W. D. HARDEMAN, State Geologist 1993 STATE OF TENNESSEE Ned McWherter Governor DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND CONSERVATION J. W. Luna Commissioner DIVISION OF GEOLOGY Edward T. Luther State Geologist CONTENTS Page Abstract…………………………………………………...…………………………………………………1 Introduction ………………………………………………………...……………………………………… 3 Area covered by present map…………………………………………………………………...…………. 3 Compilation of the map ……………………………………………………………………………………. 3 Map units…………………………………………………………………………………………………… 6 Acknowledgments……………………………………………………………………………………….…. 8 Physical geography …...........…………………………………………………………........................…… 11 Regional setting .........................…............…………………………………………………….…. 11 Unaka Mountains .............................................……………………………………………….….. 11 Valley of East Tennessee ........................................………………………………………………. 14 Cumberland Plateau ..............................……………………………………………………….….
    [Show full text]
  • Improving Structure Contour Maps: Regional Structural Elements of the Nashville and Jessamine Domes Using Automated GIS Tools
    Improving Structure Contour Maps: Regional Structural Elements of the Nashville and Jessamine Domes Using Automated GIS Tools Kenneth S. Boling1, Robert D. Hatcher Jr.1, Gary G. Bible2, Peter J. Lemiszki3, Andrew L. Wunderlich1, Morgan M.Strissel1 1 Earth and Planetary Sciences, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 2 Cougar Dome, LLC, P. O. Box 133, Helenwood, TN 3 Tennessee Division of Geology, 3711 Middlebrook Pike, Knoxville, TN Project Goals • Identify small, map-scale structural features along the Nashville and Jessamine domes • Develop a process to automate the integration of large surface and subsurface geologic datasets • Relate these features to tectonic events before and after the deposition of the Chattanooga-Ft Payne • Relate these structures to oil and gas accumulation Study Area KY TN Silurian Outcrop Small-Scale Structural Feature on the Nashville Dome: Truncation of a Pre-Chattanooga Syncline Containing Silurian Rocks Wilson et al., 1964, Geologic map of the Columbia quadrangle Generalized Stratigraphy Deicke K-Bentonite (Pencil Cave) Unconformity Ordovician Volcanic Ash Beds: K-Bentonites • High Th, K Regional extent of Bentonites • Regionally extensive Millbrig K-Bentonite (Mud Cave) Deicke K-Bentonite (Pencil Cave) (Haynes, 1994) Chattanooga Shale (Ohio, New Albany) • High U • Regionally extensive • Easy to spot on a log Aeroradioactivity Gamma Ray Log National Uranium Resource Evaluation (NURE) Data Compilation Well Logs Online databases and map services Digitized Maps Scanned Maps Offline databases Drilling Logs Why use Python? • Data management – New data can be added easily as soon as it becomes available • Reproducible results – Serves as a record of exactly what was done to the data • No more having to try and remember what you did to make that “New_final_merged_tnwells_mk2.xls” file last year.
    [Show full text]
  • Section 2.5.1 Geologic Characterization Information
    Clinch River Nuclear Site Early Site Permit Application Part 2, Site Safety Analysis Report SUBSECTION 2.5.1 TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Title Page 2.5 Geology, Seismology, and Geotechnical Engineering ............................... 2.5.1-1 2.5.1 Geologic Characterization Information ...................................... 2.5.1-1 2.5.1.1 Regional Geology (within the 200-Mile Regional Radius) ................................................................... 2.5.1-1 2.5.1.2 Local Geology ....................................................... 2.5.1-32 2.5.1.3 References ........................................................... 2.5.1-82 2.5.1-i Revision 0 Clinch River Nuclear Site Early Site Permit Application Part 2, Site Safety Analysis Report SUBSECTION 2.5.1 LIST OF TABLES Number Title 2.5.1-1 Stratigraphic Units Encountered at the Clinch River Nuclear Site 2.5.1-2 Clinch River Nuclear Stratigraphic Boundaries 2.5.1-3 Average Thickness and Variability of Each Stratigraphic Unit 2.5.1-4 Lithologic Adjectives and Modifiers 2.5.1-5 Summary of Petrographic Examination 2.5.1-6 Description of Mapped Karst Features 2.5.1-7 Occurrence of Karst Depressions by Geologic Unit in the 5-Mile Site Radius 2.5.1-8 Occurrence of Cave Entrances by Geologic Unit in the 5-Mile Site Radius 2.5.1-9 Chemistry, Mineralogy, and Petrography of Rock Core 2.5.1-10 Mineralogy of Rock Core from Clinch River Breeder Reactor Project 2.5.1-11 Cavities in Boreholes Drilled at Clinch River Nuclear Site, 1973–1978 and 2013 2.5.1-12 Definition of Joint Condition Ratings
    [Show full text]
  • Clinch River, Environmental Report References in Support of Early Site
    25847-000-G27-GGG-00076 ORNL/TM--12074 DE93 007798 Environmental Sciences Division STATUS REPORT ON THE GEOLOGY OF THE OAK RIDGE RESERVATION Robert D. Hatcher, Jr.1 Coordinator of Report Peter J. Lemiszki 1 RaNaye B. Dreier Richard H. Ketelle 2 Richard R. Lee2 David A. Lietzke 3 William M. McMaster 4 James L. Foreman _ Suk Young Lee Environmental Sciences Division Publication No. 3860 1Department of Geological Sciences, The University of Tennessee, Knoxville 37996-1410 2Energy Division, ORNL 3Route 3, Rutledge, Tennessee 37861 41400 W. Raccoon Valley Road, HeiskeU, Tennessee 37754 Date Published--October 1992 Prepared for the Office of Environmental Restoration and Waste Management (Budget Activity EW 20 10 30 1) Prepared by the OAK RIDGE NATIONAL LABORATORY Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831-6285 managed by MARTIN MARIETTA ENERGY SYSTEMS, INC. for the U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY under contract DE-AC05-84OR21400 _)ISTRIBUTIOi4 O;- THIS DOCUMENT IS UNLIMITED% 25847-000-G27-GGG-00076 25847-000-G27-GGG-00076 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................ 1 1.1 History of Geologic and Geohydrologic Work at ORNL .......................... 5 1.2 Regional Geologic Setting .............................................................................. 6 1.2.1 Physiography ..................................................................................... 6 1.2.2 Geology ..............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Graph and Reproduce This Manuscript from the Microfilm Master
    INFORMATION TO USERS The most advanced technology has been used to photo- graph and reproduce this manuscript from the microfilm master. UMI films the original text directly from the copy submitted. Thus, some dissertation copies are in typewriter face, while others may be from a computer printer. In the unlikely event that the author did not send UMI a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyrighted material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Oversize materials (e.g., maps, drawings, charts) are re­ produced by sectioning the original, beginning at the upper left-hand corner and continuing from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps. Each oversize page is available as one exposure on a standard 35 mm slide or asx a23" 17" black and white photographic print for an additional charge. Photographs included in the original manuscript have been reproduced xerographically in this copy. 35 mm slides or 6"x 9" black and white photographic prints are available for any photographs or illustrations appearing in this copy for an additional charge. Contact UMI directly to order. ■UMIAccessing the Worlds Information since 1938 300 North Zeeb Road, Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 USA Order Number 8824544 Conodont biostratigraphy of the M iddle and Upper Ordovician of the Central Basin, Tennessee Kim, Yoo Bong, Ph.D. The Ohio State University, 1988 Copyright © 1 9 8 8 by Kim, Yoo Bong. All rights reserved. 300 N. Zeeb Rd. Ann Arbor, MI 48106 PLEASE NOTE: In all c a se s this material h as b een filmed in the best possible w ay from the available copy.
    [Show full text]
  • University Microfilms
    INFORMATION TO USERS This dissertation was produced from a microfilm copy of the original document. While the most advanced technological means to photograph and reproduce this document have been used, the quality is heavily dependent upon the quality of the original submitted. The following explanation of techniques is provided to help you understand markings or patterns which may appear on this reproduction. 1. The sign or "target" for pages apparently lacking from the document photographed is "Missing Page(s)". If it was possible to obtain the missing page(s) or section, they are spliced into the film along with adjacent pages. This may have necessitated cutting thru an image and duplicating adjacent pages to insure you complete continuity. 2. When an image on the film is obliterated with a large round black mark, it is an indication that the photographer suspected that the copy may have moved during exposure and thus cause a blurred image. You will find a good image of the page in the adjacent frame. 3. When a map, drawing or chart, etc., was part of the material being photographed the photographer followed a definite method in "sectioning" the material. Ic is customary to begin photoing at the upper left hand corner of a large sheet and to continue photoing from left to right in equal sections with a small overlap. If necessary, sectioning is continued again — beginning below the first row and continuing on until complete. 4. The majority of users indicate that the textual content is of greatest value, however, a somewhat higher quality reproduction could be made from "photographs" if essential to the understanding of the dissertation.
    [Show full text]