Georgia's Rose Revolution

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Georgia's Rose Revolution Larisa Burakova Robert A. Lawson GEORGIA’S ROSE REVOLUTION How One Country Beat the Odds, Transformed Its Economy, and Provided a Model for Reformers Everywhere 330.12294758 B945 Burakova, Larisa Georgia’s Rose Revolution: how one country beat the odds, transformed its economy, and provided a model for reformers everywhere / Larisa Burakova ; Robert A. Lawson. Guatemala, Guatemala : Universidad Francisco Marroquín. The Antigua Forum, 2014. viii, 55 p. : il. 23 cm. + 6 ilustraciones, 1 mapa ISBN: 978-9929-602-24-3 - Guatemala NOTES: This case study is part of the Antigua Forum, a project of Universidad Francisco Marroquín (UFM). 1. Privatization 2. Economic liberalization 3. Bureaucracy – Georgia – Case studies 4. Market economy - History 5. Georgia (Republic) – History – Rose Revolution (2003) I. Título. LOC: HB75-130 DDC.22 First edition, January 2014 Credits ISBN 978-9929-602-24-3 Authors Copyright © 2014 Larisa Burakova THE ANTIGUA FORUM Robert A. Lawson All rights reserved. Printed in USA. Editors Wayne Leighton No part of this book may be reproduced Elizabeth Hanckel in any manner without permission from The Antigua Forum. Coordination Claudia Sosa antiguaforum.ufm.edu Cover design Tipos D Design and layout Miguel Ángel García Review Claudia Sosa Printed in USA CONTENTS About the Antigua Forum i Prologue: Cincinnatus iii Georgia: A Brief History 1 The Georgian Reform Miracle: The Big Picture 5 Why Politics Often Gives Us Bad Policy 11 Why and How Do Reforms Happen? Georgian Economic Reforms: The Rest of the Story 21 De-Bureaucratization Privatization Liberalization Conclusion: Lessons Learned 43 Appendix 47 i ABOUT THE ANTIGUA FORUM This case study is part of the Antigua Forum, a project of Univer- sidad Francisco Marroquín (UFM). The Antigua Forum seeks to promote market-liberal reform in order to improve human well- being through liberty. It does this by serving as a “place of learn- ing” for those who are committed to advancing such reform and are in a position to do so. The project has two core components. The first is an annual gathering of a small group of experienced and current political reformers, disruptors whose projects replace inefficient institu- tions, entrepreneurs who invest in reform efforts, and experts on political communications and strategy. Here, critical ques- tions are discussed and lessons drawn from past successes and failures, which can raise the probability of success for future reforms. The second component is a set of complementary resources designed to aid reformers as they study particular experiences, communicate with fellow reformers, and help others in their reform efforts. The case study is one of these resources. It is structured to dig deep into the reform of a specific country at a specific moment and to outline the process followed, obstacles overcome, key decisions made, and ultimately, lessons learned. This study is about Georgia. After seventy years of Soviet rule, this small South Caucasian nation began its march to markets in 1992, but the economic and political transition was initially chaotic and at times violent. The move away from Soviet central ii planning to a market economy was clear even during the chaotic 1990s and early 2000s. However, the most important market- liberal reforms began after the Rose Revolution in 2003. Today, Georgia stands as a leading example of how a country can trans- form itself and obtain a market economy. We tell the story of the market-liberal reforms that followed the Rose Revolution, and we draw lessons for like-minded reformers around the world. iii PROLOGUE: CINCINNATUS Lucius Quinctius Cincinnatus (520–430 BC) was a Roman aris- tocrat and political figure. In many ways, Cincinnatus was like most Roman aristocrats of his time. A landowner and senator, he served for a year in 460 BC as one of the two consuls—the high- est position in the Roman Republic. Cincinnatus became famous in his own lifetime because of his willingness to relinquish power after the job was done. On two separate occasions, Cincinnatus was called upon to assume lead- ership roles that granted dictatorial powers. First, in 458 BC he was made dictator by the Romans to fight the Aequi, who had trapped the main Roman army. Legend has it that he was plow- ing his fields when informed that the senate had named him dictator for a term of six months. After leading a Roman army and defeating the Aequi, Cincinnatus resigned and returned to his farm, having held dictatorial powers for just sixteen days. Later in 439 BC, at age eighty, another crisis brought him the dictatorship, but again he quickly handled the situation and then resigned power to return home. To this day, Cincinnatus is held up as an example of civic vir- tue—a man willing to give up his home life to serve his country in time of need. But more importantly, Cincinnatus was wise and humble enough not to abuse the powers that were bestowed upon him. He remains a great historical counterexample to Lord Acton’s warning that “power tends to corrupt, and absolute pow- er corrupts absolutely.” iv More than two thousand years later, Americans would compare George Washington to Cincinnatus. Another legend has it that Washington had to be lured from his farm in Virginia to lead the Continental army in 1775. After the American victory, Wash- ington retired again to Mount Vernon in 1784. But again after just a few years, he was asked to preside over the Constitutional Convention of 1787. With the young nation’s future still in the balance, he agreed to run for and was easily elected to two terms as president of the United States. There is little doubt that Wash- ington could have remained president for another term or two had he run again. But, like Cincinnatus before him, Washington gave up power to return to his farm. Washington’s actions are re- membered to this day by his soldiers’ descendants in the Society of the Cincinnati. The willingness of individuals to sacrifice their personal comfort for their fellow countrymen in times of crisis is certainly some- thing to be lauded. Even more laudable is having the humility to exercise power judiciously—making the tough decisions—and holding that power for no longer than necessary. The story told here involves individuals who, like Cincinnatus and Washing- ton, answered their country’s call to service in a time of great need, made the tough decisions, and then retired from public service soon thereafter. 1 GEORGIA: A BRIEF HISTORY With a population of 4.5 million and GDP (in purchasing power parity terms) of US$25 billion, Georgia has a per capita income of about $5,600. Export products include fruits and nuts, wine, mined ores, and refurbished used cars that are shipped abroad. For energy, Georgia primarily relies on hydroelectric power and imports oil and gas, mostly from neighboring Azerbaijan.1 The history of Georgia stretches back many centuries. This fer- tile region on the far eastern side of the Black Sea found itself at the crossroads of early civilizations, such as Greece to the west and Persia to the east. Archaeological evidence of Geor- gian civilizations dates back to the seventh century BC. Major Georgian kingdoms were formed by the fourth century AD in eastern and western Georgia. In the eleventh century, the two major kingdoms unified to cover much of modern-day Georgian territory. Throughout the Middle Ages, these kingdoms faced at- tacks from Moguls, Ottoman Turks, Persians, and other groups. Most Georgians today are members of the Georgian Orthodox Church, which traces its origins to Christianity from the eastern Georgian kingdom of Kartli in AD 337. Originally subordinate to the Apostolic See in Antioch (established by Saint Peter) in present-day southern Turkey, the Georgian Orthodox Church slowly established its autonomy. This was fully achieved by the eleventh century, and since that time the catholicos-patriarch of all Georgia has led the Church. 1. CIA World Factbook, “Georgia,” last modified November 4, 2013, https://www.cia. gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/gg.html. 2 Georgia’s Rose Revolution Over several decades during the late eighteenth and early nine- teenth centuries, the Russian Empire annexed much of the re- gion south of the Caucasus Mountains (see map, figure 1). Thus began nearly two centuries of Russian occupation and rule in the region. After a brief period of independence during the Russian Revolution, Georgia fell back into Russian hands in 1921 and eventually became the Georgian Soviet Socialist Republic, part of the Soviet Union. Then after seven decades of Soviet rule, Georgia declared independence on April 9, 1991, just before the collapse of the Soviet Union itself.2 Figure 1. Map of Georgia Wikimedia Commons The immediate aftermath of independence was chaotic, includ- ing a bloody coup d’état and ethnic conflicts in the Georgian regions of Abkhazia, South Ossetia, and Adjara. Economical- ly, things were little better. The breakup of the Soviet Union disrupted the long-established, if economically irrational, So- viet economic plan. Countries like Georgia, which had aligned their economies to support the Soviet plan, found themselves in limbo. The basic questions of economic life—What to pro- duce? How to produce? Who to sell to?—had not been asked by 2. The information in this section was drawn from Wikipedia’s Georgia entry and augmented with personal knowledge acquired from conversations during many visits to the country. “Georgia (country),” Wikipedia, last modified November 18, 2013, http:// en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Georgia_(country). Georgia: A Brief History 3 Georgians for seventy years. Many state-owned enterprises now owned by the Georgian government floundered as the patterns of specialization and trade within the old Soviet Union collapsed.
Recommended publications
  • Seven Churches of Revelation Turkey
    TRAVEL GUIDE SEVEN CHURCHES OF REVELATION TURKEY TURKEY Pergamum Lesbos Thyatira Sardis Izmir Chios Smyrna Philadelphia Samos Ephesus Laodicea Aegean Sea Patmos ASIA Kos 1 Rhodes ARCHEOLOGICAL MAP OF WESTERN TURKEY BULGARIA Sinanköy Manya Mt. NORTH EDİRNE KIRKLARELİ Selimiye Fatih Iron Foundry Mosque UNESCO B L A C K S E A MACEDONIA Yeni Saray Kırklareli Höyük İSTANBUL Herakleia Skotoussa (Byzantium) Krenides Linos (Constantinople) Sirra Philippi Beikos Palatianon Berge Karaevlialtı Menekşe Çatağı Prusias Tauriana Filippoi THRACE Bathonea Küçükyalı Ad hypium Morylos Dikaia Heraion teikhos Achaeology Edessa Neapolis park KOCAELİ Tragilos Antisara Abdera Perinthos Basilica UNESCO Maroneia TEKİRDAĞ (İZMİT) DÜZCE Europos Kavala Doriskos Nicomedia Pella Amphipolis Stryme Işıklar Mt. ALBANIA Allante Lete Bormiskos Thessalonica Argilos THE SEA OF MARMARA SAKARYA MACEDONIANaoussa Apollonia Thassos Ainos (ADAPAZARI) UNESCO Thermes Aegae YALOVA Ceramic Furnaces Selectum Chalastra Strepsa Berea Iznik Lake Nicea Methone Cyzicus Vergina Petralona Samothrace Parion Roman theater Acanthos Zeytinli Ada Apamela Aisa Ouranopolis Hisardere Dasaki Elimia Pydna Barçın Höyük BTHYNIA Galepsos Yenibademli Höyük BURSA UNESCO Antigonia Thyssus Apollonia (Prusa) ÇANAKKALE Manyas Zeytinlik Höyük Arisbe Lake Ulubat Phylace Dion Akrothooi Lake Sane Parthenopolis GÖKCEADA Aktopraklık O.Gazi Külliyesi BİLECİK Asprokampos Kremaste Daskyleion UNESCO Höyük Pythion Neopolis Astyra Sundiken Mts. Herakleum Paşalar Sarhöyük Mount Athos Achmilleion Troy Pessinus Potamia Mt.Olympos
    [Show full text]
  • Policy Paper N 10 a Joint Project Conducted By: 2007
    Policy Paper N 10 An Assessment of Georgia’s National Integrity System: The GNISA Project A joint project conducted by: Tiri (the Governance – Access - Learning Network), London, UK The Institute of Ethics Governance and Law, Australia Caucasus Institute for Peace, Democracy and Development Georgia 2007 Funded by the Open Society Institute and the Open Society – Georgia Foundation © The Authors 2007 have asserted their rights under the Copyright Act 1968 to be identified as the authors of this work. An Assessment of Georgia’s National Integrity System: The GNISA Project A project carried out by the Institute for Ethics Governance and Law (IEGL), Tiri (the Governance - Access - Learning Network) and the Caucasus Institute for Peace, Democracy and Development, as partners in this venture, and funded by the Open Society Institute. Final GNISA Report: July 2007 Lead Authors Dr Arthur Shacklock, Griffith University, Institute for Ethics Governance and Law Mr Malkhaz Saldadze, Caucasus Institute for Peace, Democracy and Development Ms Carmel Connors, Griffith University, Institute for Ethics Governance and Law Ms Melea Lewis, Griffith University, Institute for Ethics Governance and Law Professor Charles Sampford, Griffith University, Institute for Ethics Governance and Law Management Team Griffith University, Institute for Ethics Governance and Law Professor Charles Sampford Dr Arthur Shacklock Tiri (the Governance - Access - Learning Network): Mr Jeremy Pope Mr Martin Tisne Published by: Institute for Ethics Governance and Law, Griffith University
    [Show full text]
  • Here a Causal Relationship? Contemporary Economics, 9(1), 45–60
    Bibliography on Corruption and Anticorruption Professor Matthew C. Stephenson Harvard Law School http://www.law.harvard.edu/faculty/mstephenson/ March 2021 Aaken, A., & Voigt, S. (2011). Do individual disclosure rules for parliamentarians improve government effectiveness? Economics of Governance, 12(4), 301–324. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10101-011-0100-8 Aaronson, S. A. (2011a). Does the WTO Help Member States Clean Up? Available at SSRN 1922190. http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1922190 Aaronson, S. A. (2011b). Limited partnership: Business, government, civil society, and the public in the Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative (EITI). Public Administration and Development, 31(1), 50–63. https://doi.org/10.1002/pad.588 Aaronson, S. A., & Abouharb, M. R. (2014). Corruption, Conflicts of Interest and the WTO. In J.-B. Auby, E. Breen, & T. Perroud (Eds.), Corruption and conflicts of interest: A comparative law approach (pp. 183–197). Edward Elgar PubLtd. http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:hul.ebookbatch.GEN_batch:ELGAR01620140507 Abbas Drebee, H., & Azam Abdul-Razak, N. (2020). The Impact of Corruption on Agriculture Sector in Iraq: Econometrics Approach. IOP Conference Series. Earth and Environmental Science, 553(1), 12019-. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/553/1/012019 Abbink, K., Dasgupta, U., Gangadharan, L., & Jain, T. (2014). Letting the briber go free: An experiment on mitigating harassment bribes. JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ECONOMICS, 111(Journal Article), 17–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2013.12.012 Abbink, Klaus. (2004). Staff rotation as an anti-corruption policy: An experimental study. European Journal of Political Economy, 20(4), 887–906. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2003.10.008 Abbink, Klaus.
    [Show full text]
  • Separating Fact from Fiction in the Aiolian Migration
    hesperia yy (2008) SEPARATING FACT Pages399-430 FROM FICTION IN THE AIOLIAN MIGRATION ABSTRACT Iron Age settlementsin the northeastAegean are usuallyattributed to Aioliancolonists who journeyed across the Aegean from mainland Greece. This articlereviews the literary accounts of the migration and presentsthe relevantarchaeological evidence, with a focuson newmaterial from Troy. No onearea played a dominantrole in colonizing Aiolis, nor is sucha widespread colonizationsupported by the archaeologicalrecord. But the aggressive promotionof migrationaccounts after the PersianWars provedmutually beneficialto bothsides of theAegean and justified the composition of the Delian League. Scholarlyassessments of habitation in thenortheast Aegean during the EarlyIron Age are remarkably consistent: most settlements are attributed toAiolian colonists who had journeyed across the Aegean from Thessaly, Boiotia,Akhaia, or a combinationof all three.1There is no uniformityin theancient sources that deal with the migration, although Orestes and his descendantsare named as theleaders in mostaccounts, and are credited withfounding colonies over a broadgeographic area, including Lesbos, Tenedos,the western and southerncoasts of theTroad, and theregion betweenthe bays of Adramyttion and Smyrna(Fig. 1). In otherwords, mainlandGreece has repeatedly been viewed as theagent responsible for 1. TroyIV, pp. 147-148,248-249; appendixgradually developed into a Mountjoy,Holt Parker,Gabe Pizzorno, Berard1959; Cook 1962,pp. 25-29; magisterialstudy that is includedhere Allison Sterrett,John Wallrodt, Mal- 1973,pp. 360-363;Vanschoonwinkel as a companionarticle (Parker 2008). colm Wiener, and the anonymous 1991,pp. 405-421; Tenger 1999, It is our hope that readersinterested in reviewersfor Hesperia. Most of trie pp. 121-126;Boardman 1999, pp. 23- the Aiolian migrationwill read both articlewas writtenin the Burnham 33; Fisher2000, pp.
    [Show full text]
  • The Thermopylae Line
    CHAPTER 6 THE THERMOPYLAE LINE ENERAL Wavell arrived in Athens on the 19th April and immediately e Gheld a conference at General Wilson's quarters . Although an effectiv decision to embark the British force from Greece had been made on a higher level in London, the commanders on the spot now once agai n deeply considered the pros and cons . The Greek Government was unstable and had suggested that the British force should depart in order to avoid further devastation of the country. It was unlikely that the Greek Army of Epirus could be extricated and some of its senior officers were urging sur- render. General Wilson considered that his force could hold the Ther- mopylae line indefinitely once the troops were in position.l "The arguments in favour of fighting it out, which [it] is always better to do if possible, " wrote Wilson later,2 "were : the tying up of enemy forces, army and air , which would result therefrom ; the strain the evacuation would place o n the Navy and Merchant Marine ; the effect on the morale of the troops and the loss of equipment which would be incurred . In favour of with- drawal the arguments were : the question as to whether our forces in Greece could be reinforced as this was essential ; the question of the maintenance of our forces, plus the feeding of the civil population ; the weakness of our air forces with few airfields and little prospect of receiving reinforcements ; the little hope of the Greek Army being able to recover its morale . The decision was made to withdraw from Greece ." The British leaders con- sidered that it was unlikely that they would be able to take out any equip- ment except that which the troops carried, and that they would be lucky "to get away with 30 per cent of the force" .
    [Show full text]
  • Survey Archaeology and the Historical Geography of Central Western Anatolia in the Second Millennium BC
    European Journal of Archaeology 20 (1) 2017, 120–147 This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The Story of a Forgotten Kingdom? Survey Archaeology and the Historical Geography of Central Western Anatolia in the Second Millennium BC 1,2,3 1,3 CHRISTOPHER H. ROOSEVELT AND CHRISTINA LUKE 1Department of Archaeology and History of Art, Koç University, I˙stanbul, Turkey 2Research Center for Anatolian Civilizations, Koç University, I˙stanbul, Turkey 3Department of Archaeology, Boston University, USA This article presents previously unknown archaeological evidence of a mid-second-millennium BC kingdom located in central western Anatolia. Discovered during the work of the Central Lydia Archaeological Survey in the Marmara Lake basin of the Gediz Valley in western Turkey, the material evidence appears to correlate well with text-based reconstructions of Late Bronze Age historical geog- raphy drawn from Hittite archives. One site in particular—Kaymakçı—stands out as a regional capital and the results of the systematic archaeological survey allow for an understanding of local settlement patterns, moving beyond traditional correlations between historical geography and capital sites alone. Comparison with contemporary sites in central western Anatolia, furthermore, identifies material com- monalities in site forms that may indicate a regional architectural tradition if not just influence from Hittite hegemony. Keywords: survey archaeology, Anatolia, Bronze Age, historical geography, Hittites, Seha River Land INTRODUCTION correlates of historical territories and king- doms have remained elusive.
    [Show full text]
  • April 2018 Encourager.Pub
    April 2018 The Encourager . to grow up into Christ. St. Barnabas Lutheran Church In this issue New Members Classes Birthdays & Anniversaries ……….. p. 4 to be held in April! Message from Pastor Sarah.. .….. p. 2 Sunday, April 8, 15 & 22 Picture Page ……………………...…..... p. 7 9:15am to 10:15am Prayer Requests …………..…........... p. 4 Have you been thinking about joining St. Transition Team Update……... p. 5 Barnabas? Want to learn more about being a VBS Volunteer Meeting ….……….. p. 3 Lutheran and about the church? The 3-part series of new member classes is April 8, 15, and 22 during the Christian education hour 9:15am to 10:15am. We’ll make it official on April 29 at both services. Classes will be lead by Pastor Sarah Celebration Sunday and other ministry leaders of the congregation. We will be announcing the results of Generosity Sunday! SAVERS FUNDRAISER April 8 w/Luncheon at 11:30am The high school youth group is planning a Don’t miss this Spring Cleaning fundraiser with Savers, a exciting news!! resale shop in Crystal Lake. Starting Staff Saturday, April 7 , we will be asking people to bring Pastor Sarah Wilson ...Pastor clothing, furniture, and household items and putting Jeanne Soberg , Parish Administrator Chuck Masny, Music Director them in a trailer we’ll have in the parking lot. We’ll Dennis Mitchell , Custodian haul it all over to Savers on April 14 around noon so Jill Voelz , Nursery Supervisor they can pay us by the pound. You can clean out your Lorena Skelley , Wedding Coordinator house and turn your rummage into a worthy cause: the Youth Gathering! It’s a win-win for all! START GATHERING YOUR ITEMS NOW! For May Encourager April 15 Message from Pastor Sarah Page 2 My dad grew up on a farm, Dear One of the messages I People of heard from Professor Fram- so it made sense that he God at St.
    [Show full text]
  • Javakheti After the Rose Revolution: Progress and Regress in the Pursuit of National Unity in Georgia
    Javakheti after the Rose Revolution: Progress and Regress in the Pursuit of National Unity in Georgia Hedvig Lohm ECMI Working Paper #38 April 2007 EUROPEAN CENTRE FOR MINORITY ISSUES (ECMI) ECMI Headquarters: Schiffbruecke 12 (Kompagnietor) D-24939 Flensburg Germany +49-(0)461-14 14 9-0 fax +49-(0)461-14 14 9-19 Internet: http://www.ecmi.de ECMI Working Paper #38 European Centre for Minority Issues (ECMI) Director: Dr. Marc Weller Copyright 2007 European Centre for Minority Issues (ECMI) Published in April 2007 by the European Centre for Minority Issues (ECMI) ISSN: 1435-9812 2 Table of Contents I. INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................4 II. JAVAKHETI IN SOCIO-ECONOMIC TERMS ...........................................................5 1. The Current Socio-Economic Situation .............................................................................6 2. Transformation of Agriculture ...........................................................................................8 3. Socio-Economic Dependency on Russia .......................................................................... 10 III. DIFFERENT ACTORS IN JAVAKHETI ................................................................... 12 1. Tbilisi influence on Javakheti .......................................................................................... 12 2. Role of Armenia and Russia ............................................................................................. 13 3. International
    [Show full text]
  • Peter Nasmyth's Georgia
    PICTURE STORY Peter Nasmyth’s Georgia January 2009 Peter Nasmyth’s Georgia Today's Georgia can only be understood if it is seen in the light of the events of the past two decades. The very difficult transformation the country went through after it declared its independence in 1991, and the conflicts in Abkhazia and South Ossetia which plagued the country since then, still largely shape its present day policies. And nowhere is this better described than in Nasmyth's "Georgia" which is a collection of personal stories of the author and author's friends in Georgia over the years. In his words: I collected stories of people, very specific ones, through which I tell the bigger story of Georgia over time… I never wanted to write about the political forces here, rather the forces that make the politics. This will always give a book a longer life. [Interview with Peter Nasmyth, Tbilisi, October 2008] In the next few pages you will get a guided tour of this excellent book. It is written and it reads like a novel, yet it is full of facts that give a complete account of Georgia's modern day history. The descriptions are so colourful that reading this book is the next best thing to visiting Georgia yourself. What makes the book special is also that the author has updated the book and added new chapters two times after it was first published in 1998. Here we discuss the 2006 edition which covers the modern history of Georgia up to the events of the Rose Revolution.
    [Show full text]
  • Annexation of Georgia in Russian Empire
    1 George Anchabadze HISTORY OF GEORGIA SHORT SKETCH Caucasian House TBILISI 2005 2 George Anchabadze. History of Georgia. Short sketch Above-mentioned work is a research-popular sketch. There are key moments of the history of country since ancient times until the present moment. While working on the sketch the author based on the historical sources of Georgia and the research works of Georgian scientists (including himself). The work is focused on a wide circle of the readers. გიორგი ანჩაბაძე. საქართველოს ისტორია. მოკლე ნარკვევი წინამდებარე ნაშრომი წარმოადგენს საქართველოს ისტორიის სამეცნიერ-პოპულარულ ნარკვევს. მასში მოკლედაა გადმოცემული ქვეყნის ისტორიის ძირითადი მომენტები უძველესი ხანიდან ჩვენს დრომდე. ნარკვევზე მუშაობისას ავტორი ეყრდნობოდა საქართველოს ისტორიის წყაროებსა და ქართველ მეცნიერთა (მათ შორის საკუთარ) გამოკვლევებს. ნაშრომი განკუთვნილია მკითხველთა ფართო წრისათვის. ISBN99928-71-59-8 © George Anchabadze, 2005 © გიორგი ანჩაბაძე, 2005 3 Early Ancient Georgia (till the end of the IV cen. B.C.) Existence of ancient human being on Georgian territory is confirmed from the early stages of anthropogenesis. Nearby Dmanisi valley (80 km south-west of Tbilisi) the remnants of homo erectus are found, age of them is about 1,8 million years old. At present it is the oldest trace in Euro-Asia. Later on the Stone Age a man took the whole territory of Georgia. Former settlements of Ashel period (400–100 thousand years ago) are discovered as on the coast of the Black Sea as in the regions within highland Georgia. Approximately 6–7 thousands years ago people on the territory of Georgia began to use as the instruments not only the stone but the metals as well.
    [Show full text]
  • Monitoring Report
    ORGANISATION FOR ECONOMIC CO-OPERATION AND DEVELOPMENT ANTI-CORRUPTION NETWORK FOR EASTERN EUROPE AND CENTRAL ASIA ISTANBUL ANTI-CORRUPTION ACTION PLAN Third Round of Monitoring GEORGIA Monitoring Report The report was adopted at the Istanbul Anti-Corruption Action Plan plenary meeting on 25 September 2013 at the OECD Headquarters in Paris. Contents Executive summary .......................................................................................................................... 3 Anti-corruption policy .................................................................................................................................... 3 Criminalisation of corruption ....................................................................................................................... 3 Prevention of corruption ............................................................................................................................... 4 Third round of monitoring ............................................................................................................ 6 Country background information ............................................................................................... 8 Economic and social situation ...................................................................................................................... 8 Political system ............................................................................................................................................... 8 Trends in corruption
    [Show full text]
  • Development Perspectives of the XXI Century
    Caucasus University Friedrich Ebert Foundation International Students’ Scientific Conference Development perspectives of the XXI century Georgia, 8-11 May, 2009 UDC 330/34(479) (063) s-249 D-49 krebulSi ganTavsebulia samecniero naSromebi, SerCeuli meore saerTaSoriso studenturi samecniero konferenciisaTvis `21-e saukune _ ganviTarebis perspeq- tivebi~, romlis umTavresi mizania studentTa dasabuTebuli Tvalsazrisis warmoCena TavianTi qveynebis ganviTarebis perspeqtivaze. agreTve erTiani xedvis SemuSaveba msoflios winaSe mdgari problemebis gadawyvetis Taobaze. The collection contains works of the Second International Student’s Scientific Conference “Development Perspectives of the XXI century”. The major goal of the conference is to present reasonable arguments from the students of the countries of Europe and South Caucasus on European integration opportunities. Here also one can find the initiative on forming entire vision for solving key problems, facing Europe and South Caucasus. gamomcemeli: kavkasiis universiteti _ fridrix ebertis fondis mxardaWeriT Published by Caucasus University, with the support of Friedrich Ebert Foundation saredaqcio kolegia: Salva maWavariani (Tavmjdomare), indrek iakobsoni, giorgi RaRaniZe, londa esaZe, lia CaxunaSvili, naTia amilaxvari, dina oniani, naTia narsaviZe. Ed. board: Shalva Machavariani (head), Indrek Jakobson, Giorgi Gaganidze, Londa Esadze, Lia Chakhunashvili, Natia Amilakhvari, Dina Oniani, Natia Narsavidze. ISSN 1987-5703 Tbilisi, 2008 Contents 1. Ana Kostava The self-determination principle and
    [Show full text]