Sri Lankans' Geospatial Management at the Independence Struggles
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more
Recommended publications
-
Divisional Secretariats Contact Details
Divisional Secretariats Contact Details District Divisional Secretariat Divisional Secretary Assistant Divisional Secretary Life Location Telephone Mobile Code Name E-mail Address Telephone Fax Name Telephone Mobile Number Name Number 5-2 Ampara Ampara Addalaichenai [email protected] Addalaichenai 0672277336 0672279213 J Liyakath Ali 0672055336 0778512717 0672277452 Mr.MAC.Ahamed Naseel 0779805066 Ampara Ampara [email protected] Divisional Secretariat, Dammarathana Road,Indrasarapura,Ampara 0632223435 0632223004 Mr.H.S.N. De Z.Siriwardana 0632223495 0718010121 063-2222351 Vacant Vacant Ampara Sammanthurai [email protected] Sammanthurai 0672260236 0672261124 Mr. S.L.M. Hanifa 0672260236 0716829843 0672260293 Mr.MM.Aseek 0777123453 Ampara Kalmunai (South) [email protected] Divisional Secretariat, Kalmunai 0672229236 0672229380 Mr.M.M.Nazeer 0672229236 0772710361 0672224430 Vacant - Ampara Padiyathalawa [email protected] Divisional Secretariat Padiyathalawa 0632246035 0632246190 R.M.N.Wijayathunga 0632246045 0718480734 0632050856 W.Wimansa Senewirathna 0712508960 Ampara Sainthamarathu [email protected] Main Street Sainthamaruthu 0672221890 0672221890 Mr. I.M.Rikas 0752800852 0672056490 I.M Rikas 0777994493 Ampara Dehiattakandiya [email protected] Divisional Secretariat, Dehiattakandiya. 027-2250167 027-2250197 Mr.R.M.N.C.Hemakumara 027-2250177 0701287125 027-2250081 Mr.S.Partheepan 0714314324 Ampara Navithanvelly [email protected] Divisional secretariat, Navithanveli, Amparai 0672224580 0672223256 MR S.RANGANATHAN 0672223256 0776701027 0672056885 MR N.NAVANEETHARAJAH 0777065410 0718430744/0 Ampara Akkaraipattu [email protected] Main Street, Divisional Secretariat- Akkaraipattu 067 22 77 380 067 22 800 41 M.S.Mohmaed Razzan 067 2277236 765527050 - Mrs. A.K. Roshin Thaj 774659595 Ampara Ninthavur Nintavur Main Street, Nintavur 0672250036 0672250036 Mr. T.M.M. -
Part I: the Kandyan Kings and Cosmopolitan Discourse
THE MANY FACES OF THE KANDYAN KINGDOM, 1591-1765: LESSONS FOR OUR TIME?1 PART I: THE KANDYAN KINGS AND COSMOPOLITAN DISCOURSE Introduction This paper discusses the reign of Vimaladharmasūriya, the first consecrated king of Kandy (1591-1604) and his successors during whose reigns the Kandyan kingdom became a place that provided a home for diverse cultures and communities. Prior to this Kandy was ruled by three local kings, the first being Senāsammata Vikramabāhu (c. 1469-1511). Senāsammata means elected by the sēna or army or perhaps by members of the aristocratic class known as banḍ āras (“lords).” Vikramabāhu tried to assert his independence from the sovereign kings of Kōṭṭe. That kingdom commenced with Bhūvanekabāhu V (1371-1408) and ended with Bhūvanekabāhu VII (1521-51) and his grandson Dharmapāla (1551- 1597), the first Catholic sovereign. Vikramabāhu was badly defeated and had to pay a large tribute. After Dharmapāla died Kōṭṭe became part of Portugal which now had control over much of Jaffna in the north and the Maritime provinces in the south. The Portuguese were a presence in Kōṭṭe from 1506 and had the support of Bhūvanekabāhu VII but not his brother Māyādunne, the ruler of Sītāvaka 1 who was a foe of the Portuguese. His intrepid son Rājasinha I (1581-1593) at one time nearly brought about the whole kingdom of Kōṭṭe and much of Kandy under his rule. As for the fortunes of Kandy Vikramabāhu was followed by his son Jayavīra Banḍ āra (1511- 1552) during whose time Catholic friars became a presence in the court.2 In order to please the Portuguese and the king of Kōṭṭe he became a nominal Catholic until he was deposed and exiled by his son Karalliyadde Banḍ āra (1552-1582) who became a devoted Catholic and publicly embraced Catholicism around 1562-1564. -
The Dutch Administrative Structure in Sri Lanka
THE DUTCH ADMINISTRATIVE STRUCTURE IN SRI LANKA S. ARAsARATNAM In 1609, within a decade of the establishment of the Vereenigd.. Oostindische Comp- pagnie (V. O. C.) and the founding of the first forts and factories in the East Indies, the dire- ctors decided to institute the office of governor general as the highest authori ty with overall control of the Company's eastern assets and activities. He was to exercise his power in association with a council of Indies in which decisions were taken by majority vote. In 1619 Jacatra (later renamed Batavia) was made the seat of the governor general and council and thus the capital of the Company's eastern enterprises.' Detailed instructions given to the first holder of this office, Pieter Both, and subsequently amplified and amended, show that the directors intended the government at Batavia to be the coordinator and controller of all aspects of the Company's activities in the East : political, commercial, financial, naval and military, social and religious. The centralization of all Dutch power in the east in the citadel of Batavia was effectively achieved with the governor generalship of Jan Pietersz Coen, As Dutch territorial possessions and commercial activities expanded in east, southeast and southern Asia, this role of coordination and supervision from Batavia assumed greater significance. Most decisions of a political nature, where delay would be injurious to Dutch interests, were taken at Batavia. The Heeren Zeventien or college of directors, though employers and superiors of the Batavian officials, were not in a position to issue detailed instructions on specific issues. -
Divisional Secretariat Contact Details Last Update - 2019.02.26
Divisional Secretariat Contact Details Last Update - 2019.02.26 Divisional Secratariat Divisional Secretary Additional Divisional Secretary District E-mail Address Divisional Secratariat Address Telephone Number Fax Number Name Telephone Number Mobile Number Name Telephone Number Mobile Number Ampara Ampara [email protected] Addalaichenai Addalaichenai 0672277336 0672279213 J Liyakath Ali 0672055336 0778512717 TJ Athisayaraj 0672277452 0776174102 Divisional Secretariat, Dammarathana Ampara [email protected] Ampara 0632223435 0632223004 N.M.Upeksha Kumari 063-2224595 0702690042 R.Thiraviyaraj 063-2222351 0779597487 Road,Indrasarapura,Ampara Ampara [email protected] Sammanthurai Sammanthurai 0672260236 0672261124 Mr.S.L.Mohamed Haniffa 0672260236 0771098618 Mr.MM.Aseek 0672260293 07684233430 Ampara [email protected] Kalmunai South Divisional Secretariat, Kalmunai 0672229236 0672229380 M.M. Nazeer 0672229236 0772710361 T.J. Athisayaraj 0672224430 0776174102 Ampara [email protected] Padiyathalawa Divisional Secretariat Padiyathalawa 0632246035 0632246190 R.M.N.Wijayathunga 0632246045 0718480734 W.Wimansa Senewirathna 0632050856 0712508960 Ampara [email protected] Sainthamaruthu Main Street Sainthamaruthu 0672221890 0672221890 Nill Nill Nill I.M Rikas 0672056490 0777994493 Ampara [email protected] Dehiattakandiya. Divisional Secretariat, Dehiattakandiya. 027-2250167 027-2250197 Mrs.M.P.W.Shiromani. 027-2250177 0718898478 Mr.S.Partheepan 027-2250081 0714314324 -
251 Chapter IX Revolution And
251 Chapter IX Revolution and Law (1789 – 1856) The Collapse of the European States System The French Revolution of 1789 did not initialise the process leading to the collapse of the European states system but accelerated it. In the course of the revolution, demands became articulate that the ruled were not to be classed as subjects to rulers but ought to be recognised as citizens of states and members of nations and that, more fundamentally, the continuity of states was not a value in its own right but ought to be measured in terms of their usefulness for the making and the welfare of nations. The transformations of groups of subjects into nations of citizens took off in the political theory of the 1760s. Whereas Justus Lipsius and Thomas Hobbes1 had described the “state of nature” as a condition of human existence that might occur close to or even within their present time, during the later eighteenth century, theorists of politics and international relations started to position that condition further back in the past, thereby assuming that a long period of time had elapsed between the end of the “state of nature” and the making of states and societies, at least in some parts of the world. Moreover, these theorists regularly fused the theory of the hypothetical contract for the establishment of government, which had been assumed since the fourteenth century, with the theory of the social contract, which had only rarely been postulated before.2 In the view of later eighteenth-century theorists, the combination of both types of contract was to establish the nation as a society of citizens.3 Supporters of this novel theory of the combined government and social contract not merely considered human beings as capable of moving out from the “state of nature” into states, but also gave to humans the discretional mandate to first form their own nations as what came to be termed “civil societies”, before states could come into existence.4 Within states perceived in accordance with these theoretical suppositions, nationals remained bearers of sovereignty. -
Books, Broadsides & Manuscripts
BOOKS, BROADSIDES & MANUSCRIPTS - USUAL IMPRINTS - ORIENTAL PRINTING - BROADSIDES - TRAVEL & HISTORY LIST: DECEMBER 2017 TURCICA: CANONS OU RÈGLEMENTS DE SULTAN SÉLIM II À SON RETOUR À CONSTANTINOPLE APRÈS UNE VICTOI[RE] COMPLETTE SUR LES ALLEMANDS, CONCERNANT LES ODGIAKS ET CASERNES DES JANISSAIRES. TRADUIT DE L'IDIOME TURC EN IDIOME FRANÇAIS PAR JEAN BAPTE ADANSON A unique manuscript French translation of an unpublished Turkish text with valuable information on Janissaries in the 16th century in Turkey, was written by a French Orentalist and translator Jean-Baptiste Adanson. Author: Jean-Baptiste Louis ADANSON (1732 - 1803), Translator. Place and Year: [Probably Constantinople, early 1750s]. Technique: Small 4° (21,5 x 16,5 cm). MANUSCRIPT on paper, [40] manuscript title and 64 pages with manuscript (others blank), stitched, later paper wrappers, in a marbled paper box (Very Good, some staining to right-hand margin of first 3 leaves, not affecting text) Code: 65893 The manuscript in French language is a translation of an unpublished Turkish hand-written text on Janissaries in the 16th century, under the rule of Selim II (1524 –1574). The Janissaries were a special elite infantry units that formed the Ottoman Sultan's household troops, bodyguards and the first modern standing army in Europe. The members of the Janissaries were mostly kidnapped Christian boys and slaves (the Muslims were not allowed to enslave other Muslims), who had to convert to Islam and undergo a strict military training. As soldiers they received a high salary and were enjoying a special social status, but were not allow to marry nor grow beards. By the 18th century they lost their military character. -
Dr. K.M. Rohitha Dasanayaka
CURRICULUM VITAE Dr. KMR Dasanayaka Senior Lecturer (Gr. II) Department of History Faculty of Arts University of Peradeniya Sri Lanka CURRICULUM VITAE FULL NAME : KULATUNGA MUDIYANSELAGE ROHITHA DASANAYAKA OFFICIAL ADDRESS : Department of History, University of Peradeniya, Peradeniya, Sri Lanka. TELEPHONE (MOBILE) : 00 94 713212616 TELEPHONE (RESIDENCE) : 00 94 812386958/812494423 EMAIL : [email protected]/ [email protected] HOME AND MAILING ADDRESS : 157/1, Gannoruwa, Peradeniya, Sri Lanka. PERSONAL INFORMATION DATE OF BIRTH : 02.03.1973 PLACE OF BIRTH : Kandy CITIZENSHIP : Sri Lankan CIVIL STATES : Married, Two children EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND AND ACADEMIC QUALIFICATION 2000 : Doctor of Philosophy Degree in History from the Madras University, India. Topic of Research: Trade Relations between Sri Lanka and West Asia from 7th Century A.D. to 15th Century A.D.: A Historical Survey Research Supervisor: Dr. G. Venkataraman, Professor & Head, Department of History, University of Madras, Chennai, India 2004 : Master of Social Science (Special in History). University of Kelaniya, Sri Lanka. Topic of Research: Trade Relations between Sri Lanka and West Asia from 6th Century A.D., to 13th Century A.D. Research Supervisor: Professor Mangala Ilangasighe, Professor Emeritus, Department of History, University of Kelaniya, Sri Lanka. ACADEMIC DESIGNATIONS: OCCUPATION 2009 up to date : Senior Lecturer Grade II, Department of History, University of Peradeniya, Sri Lanka. 2001-2009 : Lecturer, Department of History, University of Peradeniya, Sri Lanka. 1999-2001 : Temporary Assistant Lecturer, Department of History, University of Peradeniya, Sri Lanka. TEACHER TRAINING 2004 : Completed the training Programme on Teaching Methodology, The Staff Development Centre, University of Peradeniya, Sri Lanka VISITING ACADEMIC POSITIONS 2015 up to date : Degree programme in Regional Science and Planning. -
Reappropriation, Resistance, and British Autocracy in Sri Lanka, 1820-1850
The Historical Journal Reapprop riation, Resistance, and British Autocracy in Sri Lanka, 1820-1850 Journal: The Historical Journal Manuscript ID HJ-2015-119.R1 Manuscript Type: Article Period: 1800-99 Thematic: Political, Administrative & Legal, Social, Cultural Geographic: Asia, South Cambridge University Press Page 1 of 50 The Historical Journal REAPPROPRIATION, RESISTANCE, AND BRITISH AUTOCRACY IN SRI LANKA, 1820-1850 * JAMES WILSON Sidney Sussex College, University of Cambridge ABSTRACT. Sri Lanka’s kingdom of Kandy fell to the British in 1815 and a rebellion in its name was defeated two years later. Across the next three decades, islanders took up religious ceremonies, legal concepts, and regal traditions formerly linked to Kandy’s king and his court. These reappropriations were responses to efforts by the state to control Sri Lanka: expressions of kingship reassembled in particular ways to resist specific British incursions. Critically, islanders situated these activities in historical, colonial, and global contexts, manipulating transoceanic and imperial networks. Although they invariably failed, episodes of reappropriation bemused colonists with their complexities and globalisms and gradually subverted British autocracy, the form of imperial governance in Sri Lanka. Autocracy then gave way to more regularized modes of rule. Bringing together three separate examples, this paper disputes an important argument about Sri Lanka’s insurgent national character and reveals islanders’ elaborate responses to the Cambridge University Press The Historical Journal Page 2 of 50 RESISTANCE IN COLONIAL SRI LANKA incursions of imperialism. More broadly, it suggests that such episodes should be viewed as creative instances of resistance that deployed networks, practices, and ideas and became enmeshed with the development of the state through their influence over colonial governance. -
Narration of the History of Our Proud Ancestral (Orang Jawa) Heritage
Page. 1 Narration of the History of our Proud Ancestral (Orang Jawa) Heritage. by Noor R. Rahim June 2016. Page. 2 Contents: Preface Page 4. Chapter 1. Page 6. 5. 1.1 Background Information Page 7. 1.2 Batavia – The Administrative Centre & Central Hub of Commerce Page 9. 1.3 Invitation to the Dutch VOC by The King of Kandy Page 9. Chapter 2. Page 11. 2.1 Our Ancestors Arrival and Domicile in Sailan Page 12. 2.2 Colonial Forts/Fortresses and Garrisons Page 13. 2.3 Pictures of Forts that are intact Page 15. 2.4 Pictures of Forts in bad state/dilapidated Page 17. 2.5 The domicile of the Soldiers & their Families Page 18. 2.6 Handover from Dutch to the British and Temporary “Dual Control” Page 19. 2.7 Our Malay Ancestors Military Service with the British Page 19. 2.8 The 1st Kandyan War – 1803 Page 19. 2.9 The 2nd Kandyan War – 1815 Page 20. 2.10 The Great Rebellion of 1817 – 1818 (aka The Uva-Wellasa Uprising) Page 21. 2.11 The Matale Rebellion of 1848 Page 21. 2.12 The effects of Disbanding of the Regiment Page 22. 2.13 Sacrifices and Bravery of the Malays serving In the Armed Forces & Police services. Page 22. Page. 3 Chapter 3. Page 24. 3.1 Legacy of our Ancestors Page 25. 3.2 Religious following Page 26. 3.3 Some of the well-known Mosques built by the Malays Page 27. 3.4 Malays that attained Sainthood Page 33. Chapter 4. Page 35. -
The Case of the Kandyan Kingdom of Sri Lanka
THEORIES OF INFLUENCE IN FASHION: THE CASE OF THE KANDYAN KINGDOM OF SRI LANKA Gayathri Madubhani Ranathunga Abstract Fashion, an essentially dynamic human activity, earns its survival by influencing others. There are assumed to be some kind of theories behind influence in fashion, hence this research aims to find out the base of those influencing process in fashion. Kandyan reign of Sri Lanka (15th Century AD to 1815) was selected for the research. The era is well- known for the strong effects of foreign influences on the dress of royalty and elite, was analyzed in this research paper. The study began with the observational study of temple paintings, sculptures, sketches of the period. In order to ensure the reliability, the data were cross-checked with different sources. The reinforced concept was compared with formally established philosophy in order to forward timely necessary concepts. "Grounded theory methodology" was selected to the research in order to generate theories of influence. Research findings show that observational learning depends on the learning ability of people. It was found out that the reliability of the person who is to be observed is very much concerned in this process. Foreign delegate such as European diplomats was always subjected to be observed by the King. The King maintained a close friendship with foreign officers. Respectively, the King was subjected to be observed by native Adigars'. Elite dressed as same as the King. South Indian queens (randoli) who were considered as the right heir to the throne were always observed by native queens of yakadadoli. Native queens followed South Indian dress styles. -
Meaghan Walker
Mobilising Clothes at Sea: Naval Dress Culture and Economy during the French Wars, 1793-1815 by Meaghan Walker A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History Department of History and Classics University of Alberta © Meaghan Walker, 2020 ii Abstract During the British involvement in the French Revolutionary and Napoleonic Wars, 1793- 1815, the Royal Navy contracted for, inspected, and distributed clothing to naval warships in British ports and abroad. This dissertation examines the Admiralty in-letters stored at the British National Archives, Kew, and the Caird Library, at the National Maritime Museum, Greenwich, to understand how this system worked both practically as a system of production and distribution, but also rhetorically, as an important aspect of the power between administrators, commanders and crew. The Royal Navy concurrently provided clothing on three different models. Officers wore loosely regulated uniforms that they personally paid for and sourced. Sailors wore slop clothes, mass-produced clothing purchased from private contractors in bulk. Finally, the marines were dressed in a combination of the two. They wore slops when they performed seafaring labour and during leisure time but wore more strictly regulated uniforms that were reminiscent of those from the army when policing sailors. Naval commanders both interfered with the uniforms of the marines, whose red coats visually challenged naval authority, and advocated for sailors’ slop clothing to solidify their own paternal mastery of their vessels. The navy was a large bureaucratic and technological body beyond its primary military function, and clothing reveals how much time commanders spent on tedious paperwork and supply issues between moments of heightened military action. -
02Whole.Pdf (1.821Mb)
"A Question of Necessity" : The Native Police in Queensland Author Richards, Jonathan Published 2005 Thesis Type Thesis (PhD Doctorate) School School of Arts, Media and Culture DOI https://doi.org/10.25904/1912/3180 Copyright Statement The author owns the copyright in this thesis, unless stated otherwise. Downloaded from http://hdl.handle.net/10072/365772 Griffith Research Online https://research-repository.griffith.edu.au “A Question of Necessity”: The Native Police in Queensland Jonathan Richards, Bachelor of Arts in Australian and Comparative Studies (Honours) IMAGE REMOVED. PLEASE CONSULT PRINT COPY OF THESIS HELD IN GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY School of Arts, Media and Culture, Griffith University Submitted in fulfilment of the requirements of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy March, 2005 Abstract Frontier issues are an inevitable part of Australian historiography, and have often been dealt with in either an indifferent or a moralistic manner. Specifically, it has been widely argued that records of officially condoned frontier violence have been destroyed or lost. This thesis, which deals with the Native Police in Queensland from 1860 to 1905, attempts to move the discussion on to firmer ground. It is driven by a passionate commitment to the rights of Indigenous Australians, and shows that detailed archival research does not support those who deny the violence that accompanied the colonisation of Australia. Apologists for dispossession will find no comfort in the archival records. The Native Police force was widely reputed to have been the most violent police force on the Australian frontier. Long-standing and widely cited references about the lack of Native Police records have been tied into arguments about the kind of force it was.