Using Bayesian Model Averaging to Improve Hurricane Track

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Using Bayesian Model Averaging to Improve Hurricane Track USING BAYESIAN MODEL AVERAGING TO IMPROVE HURRICANE TRACK FORECASTS by ROBERT HILL SHACKELFORD JR (Under the Direction of JEFFREY H. DORFMAN) ABSTRACT I study whether Bayesian composite forecasting can produce improved track forecasts for hurricanes. Using data on hurricanes back to 2005, the first step is to find a set of storms most similar to the one to have its track forecast. Then, the performance of ten hurricane forecasting models on those similar storms is used to calculate the weights that will be placed on each of these models. These weights are used to form a Bayesian composite forecast of the track for the hurricane of interest, rather than the currently, more standard, simple average utilized by the National Hurricane Center (NHC). On a small selection of recent hurricanes, the performance of the Bayesian composite forecast tracks are compared to the individual model forecasts and the NHC official forecasts. In most of our cases, the Bayesian composite forecast is more accurate than the NHC forecast. INDEX WORDS: Bayesian, Hurricane Forecasting, Bayesian Model Averaging, Tracking USING BAYESIAN MODEL AVERAGING TO IMPROVE HURRICANE TRACK FORECASTS by ROBERT HILL SHACKELFORD JR BS, University of Georgia, 2014 BSEC, University of Georgia, 2014 A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the University of Georgia in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree MASTER OF SCIENCE ATHENS, GEORGIA 2017 © 2017 Robert Shackelford All Rights Reserved USING BAYESIAN MODEL AVERAGING TO IMPROVE HURRICANE TRACK FORECASTS by ROBERT HILL SHACKELFORD JR Major Professor: Jeffrey H. Dorfman Committee: Marshall Shepherd Craig Landry Electronic Version Approved: Suzanne Barbour Dean of the Graduate School The University of Georgia August 2017 DEDICATION This paper is dedicated to my wife Hannah. I love you so much and I am so thankful for how you have fought for me as I have worked on this paper. This paper is also dedicated to my family and friends who have made me the person I am today. This paper is most importantly dedicated to Jesus Christ, who provided me the means to get my Master’s degree. I look forward to how You will continue to use me in the next season. iv ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to acknowledge Jeff Dorfman for helping me with the coding to make our results a viable alternative to tracking hurricanes. I would also like to acknowledge for Theresa Andersen and Marshall Shepherd for assisting in interpreting the NOAA hurricane data to be able to use their archive to make it all possible. v TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS .............................................................................................................v LIST OF TABLES ......................................................................................................................... ix LIST OF FIGURES ....................................................................................................................... xi CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION .........................................................................................................1 2 BACKGROUND ...........................................................................................................5 3 DATA ..........................................................................................................................14 4 METHODOLOGY ......................................................................................................16 5 RESULTS ....................................................................................................................22 TABLE 1: FORECAST ACCURACY RESULTS................................................23 TABLE 2: MSE COMPARISONS ........................................................................24 TABLE 3: MATTHEW FORECAST WITH POWER 2 ......................................25 TABLE 4: MATTHEW FORECAST WITH POWER 10 ....................................25 TABLE 5: MATTHEW FORECAST WITH POWER 50 ....................................25 TABLE 6: NHC FORECAST FOR MATTHEW .................................................26 TABLE 7: OFFICAL TRACK FOR MATTHEW ................................................26 TABLE 8: EARL FORECAST WITH POWER 2 ................................................27 TABLE 9: EARL FORECAST WITH POWER 10 ..............................................27 TABLE 10: EARL FORECAST WITH POWER 50 ............................................27 vi TABLE 11: NHC FORECAST FOR EARL .........................................................28 TABLE 12: OFFICAL TRACK FOR EARL ........................................................28 TABLE 13: DANNY FORECAST WITH POWER 2 ..........................................29 TABLE 14: DANNY FORECAST WITH POWER 10 ........................................29 TABLE 15: DANNY FORECAST WITH POWER 50 ........................................29 TABLE 16: NHC FORECAST FOR DANNY .....................................................30 TABLE 17: OFFICAL TRACK FOR DANNY ....................................................30 TABLE 18: BERTHA FORECAST WITH POWER 2 .........................................31 TABLE 19: BERTHA FORECAST WITH POWER 10 .......................................31 TABLE 20: BERTHA FORECAST WITH POWER 50 .......................................31 TABLE 21: NHC FORECAST FOR DANNY .....................................................32 TABLE 22: OFFICIAL TRACK FOR DANNY ...................................................32 TABLE 23: HUMBERTO FORECAST WITH POWER 2 ..................................33 TABLE 24: HUMBERTO FORECAST WITH POWER 10 ................................33 TABLE 25: HUMBERTO FORECAST WITH POWER 50 ................................33 TABLE 26: NHC FORECAST FOR HUMBERTO .............................................34 TABLE 27: OFFICIAL TRACK FOR HUMBERTO ...........................................34 TABLE 28: ACCURACY MEASURES FOR LANDFALL FORCASTS ...........38 TABLE 29: ISAAC FORECAST ..........................................................................38 TABLE 30: NHC FORECAST FOR ISAAC ........................................................38 TABLE 31: OFFICIAL TRACK FOR ISAAC .....................................................39 TABLE 32: HERMINE FORECAST ....................................................................39 TABLE 33: NHC FORECAST FOR HERMINE ..................................................40 vii TABLE 34: OFFICIAL TRACK FOR HERMINE ...............................................40 TABLE 35: SANDY FORECAST ........................................................................40 TABLE 36: NHC FORECAST FOR SANDY ......................................................41 TABLE 37: OFFICIAL TRACK FOR SANDY ...................................................41 TABLE 38: JOAQUIN FORECAST .....................................................................41 TABLE 39: NHC FORECAST FOR JOAQUIN ..................................................42 TABLE 40: OFFICAIAL TRACK FOR JOAQUIN .............................................42 TABLE 41: MATTHEW FORECAST ..................................................................42 TABLE 42: NHC FORECAST FOR MATTHEW ...............................................43 TABLE 43: OFFICIAL TRACK FOR MATTHEW .............................................43 6 CONCLUSION ............................................................................................................47 REFERENCES ..............................................................................................................................48 APPENDICES A CODING FOR SIMILAR STORMS ...........................................................................53 B CODING FOR FINDING FORECAST ......................................................................54 viii LIST OF TABLES Page Table 1: WEIGHTS FOR MATTHEW POWER 2 .......................................................................58 Table 2: WEIGHTS FOR MATTHEW POWER 10 .....................................................................59 Table 3: WEIGHTS FOR MATTHEW POWER 50 .....................................................................59 Table 4: SSES FOR MATTHEW ..................................................................................................60 Table 5: WEIGHTS FOR EARL POWER 2 .................................................................................61 Table 6: WEIGHTS FOR EARL POWER 10 ...............................................................................61 Table 7: WEIGHTS FOR EARL POWER 50 ...............................................................................62 Table 8: SSES FOR EARL ............................................................................................................62 Table 9: WEIGHTS FOR DANNY POWER 2 .............................................................................63 Table 10: WEIGHTS FOR DANNY POWER 10 .........................................................................63 Table 11: WEIGHTS FOR DANNY POWER 50 .........................................................................64 Table 12: SSES FOR DANNY ......................................................................................................64 Table 13: WEIGHTS FOR BERTHA POWER 2..........................................................................65 Table 14: WEIGHTS FOR BERTHA POWER 10........................................................................66 Table 15: WEIGHTS FOR BERTHA POWER 50........................................................................66
Recommended publications
  • Observed Hurricane Wind Speed Asymmetries and Relationships to Motion and Environmental Shear
    1290 MONTHLY WEATHER REVIEW VOLUME 142 Observed Hurricane Wind Speed Asymmetries and Relationships to Motion and Environmental Shear ERIC W. UHLHORN NOAA/AOML/Hurricane Research Division, Miami, Florida BRADLEY W. KLOTZ Cooperative Institute for Marine and Atmospheric Studies, Rosenstiel School of Marine and Atmospheric Science, University of Miami, Miami, Florida TOMISLAVA VUKICEVIC,PAUL D. REASOR, AND ROBERT F. ROGERS NOAA/AOML/Hurricane Research Division, Miami, Florida (Manuscript received 6 June 2013, in final form 19 November 2013) ABSTRACT Wavenumber-1 wind speed asymmetries in 35 hurricanes are quantified in terms of their amplitude and phase, based on aircraft observations from 128 individual flights between 1998 and 2011. The impacts of motion and 850–200-mb environmental vertical shear are examined separately to estimate the resulting asymmetric structures at the sea surface and standard 700-mb reconnaissance flight level. The surface asymmetry amplitude is on average around 50% smaller than found at flight level, and while the asymmetry amplitude grows in proportion to storm translation speed at the flight level, no significant growth at the surface is observed, contrary to conventional assumption. However, a significant upwind storm-motion- relative phase rotation is found at the surface as translation speed increases, while the flight-level phase remains fairly constant. After removing the estimated impact of storm motion on the asymmetry, a significant residual shear direction-relative asymmetry is found, particularly at the surface, and, on average, is located downshear to the left of shear. Furthermore, the shear-relative phase has a significant downwind rotation as shear magnitude increases, such that the maximum rotates from the downshear to left-of-shear azimuthal location.
    [Show full text]
  • Conference Poster Production
    65th Interdepartmental Hurricane Conference Miami, Florida February 28 - March 3, 2011 Hurricane Earl:September 2, 2010 Ocean and Atmospheric Influences on Tropical Cyclone Predictions: Challenges and Recent Progress S E S S Session 2 I The 2010 Tropical Cyclone Season in Review O N 2 The 2010 Atlantic Hurricane Season: Extremely Active but no U.S. Hurricane Landfalls Eric Blake and John L. Beven II ([email protected]) NOAA/NWS/National Hurricane Center The 2010 Atlantic hurricane season was quite active, with 19 named storms, 12 of which became hurricanes and 5 of which reached major hurricane intensity. These totals are well above the long-term normals of about 11 named storms, 6 hurricanes, and 2 major hurricanes. Although the 2010 season was considerably busier than normal, no hurricanes struck the United States. This was the most active season on record in the Atlantic that did not have a U.S. landfalling hurricane, and was also the second year in a row without a hurricane striking the U.S. coastline. A persistent trough along the east coast of the United States steered many of the hurricanes out to sea, while ridging over the central United States kept any hurricanes over the western part of the Caribbean Sea and Gulf of Mexico farther south over Central America and Mexico. The most significant U.S. impacts occurred with Tropical Storm Hermine, which brought hurricane-force wind gusts to south Texas along with extremely heavy rain, six fatalities, and about $240 million dollars of damage. Hurricane Earl was responsible for four deaths along the east coast of the United States due to very large swells, although the center of the hurricane stayed offshore.
    [Show full text]
  • Historical Changes in the Mississippi-Alabama Barrier Islands and the Roles of Extreme Storms, Sea Level, and Human Activities
    HISTORICAL CHANGES IN THE MISSISSIPPI-ALABAMA BARRIER ISLANDS AND THE ROLES OF EXTREME STORMS, SEA LEVEL, AND HUMAN ACTIVITIES Robert A. Morton 88∞46'0"W 88∞44'0"W 88∞42'0"W 88∞40'0"W 88∞38'0"W 88∞36'0"W 88∞34'0"W 88∞32'0"W 88∞30'0"W 88∞28'0"W 88∞26'0"W 88∞24'0"W 88∞22'0"W 88∞20'0"W 88∞18'0"W 30∞18'0"N 30∞18'0"N 30∞20'0"N Horn Island 30∞20'0"N Petit Bois Island 30∞16'0"N 30∞16'0"N 30∞18'0"N 30∞18'0"N 2005 2005 1996 Dauphin Island 1996 2005 1986 1986 30∞16'0"N Kilometers 30∞14'0"N 0 1 2 3 4 5 1966 30∞16'0"N 1950 30∞14'0"N 1950 Kilometers 1917 0 1 2 3 4 5 1917 1848 1849 30∞14'0"N 30∞14'0"N 30∞12'0"N 30∞12'0"N 30∞12'0"N 30∞12'0"N 30∞10'0"N 30∞10'0"N 88∞46'0"W 88∞44'0"W 88∞42'0"W 88∞40'0"W 88∞38'0"W 88∞36'0"W 88∞34'0"W 88∞32'0"W 88∞30'0"W 88∞28'0"W 88∞26'0"W 88∞24'0"W 88∞22'0"W 88∞20'0"W 88∞18'0"W 89∞10'0"W 89∞8'0"W 89∞6'0"W 89∞4'0"W 88∞58'0"W 88∞56'0"W 88∞54'0"W 88∞52'0"W 30∞16'0"N Cat Island Ship Island 30∞16'0"N 2005 30∞14'0"N 1996 30∞14'0"N 1986 Kilometers 1966 0 1 2 3 30∞14'0"N 1950 30∞14'0"N 1917 1848 Fort 2005 Massachusetts 1995 1986 Kilometers 1966 0 1 2 3 30∞12'0"N 1950 30∞12'0"N 1917 30∞12'0"N 30∞12'0"N 1848 89∞10'0"W 89∞8'0"W 89∞6'0"W 89∞4'0"W 88∞58'0"W 88∞56'0"W 88∞54'0"W 88∞52'0"W Open-File Report 2007-1161 U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • And Hurricane Michael (2018)
    This work was written as part of one of the author's official duties as an Employee of the United States Government and is therefore a work of the United States Government. In accordance with 17 U.S.C. 105, no copyright protection is available for such works under U.S. Law. Access to this work was provided by the University of Maryland, Baltimore County (UMBC) ScholarWorks@UMBC digital repository on the Maryland Shared Open Access (MD-SOAR) platform. Please provide feedback Please support the ScholarWorks@UMBC repository by emailing [email protected] and telling us what having access to this work means to you and why it’s important to you. Thank you. atmosphere Article Understanding the Role of Mean and Eddy Momentum Transport in the Rapid Intensification of Hurricane Irma (2017) and Hurricane Michael (2018) Alrick Green 1, Sundararaman G. Gopalakrishnan 2, Ghassan J. Alaka, Jr. 2 and Sen Chiao 3,* 1 Atmospheric Physics, University of Maryland, Baltimore County, Baltimore, MD 21250, USA; [email protected] 2 Hurricane Research Division, NOAA/AOML, Miami, FL 33149, USA; [email protected] (S.G.G.); [email protected] (G.J.A.) 3 Department of Meteorology and Climate Science, San Jose State University, San Jose, CA 95192, USA * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +1-408-924-5204 Abstract: The prediction of rapid intensification (RI) in tropical cyclones (TCs) is a challenging problem. In this study, the RI process and factors contributing to it are compared for two TCs: an axis-symmetric case (Hurricane Irma, 2017) and an asymmetric case (Hurricane Michael, 2018).
    [Show full text]
  • Desoto's Seafood Kitchen
    beachin’August 2019 LIFE ON THE ALABAMA GULF COAST LET YOUR STYLE ROAR With Disney’s The Lion King Collection by Pandora © 2019 Pandora Jewelry, LLC • All rights reserved • The Lion King © 2019 Disney DIAMOND JEWELERS GULF SHORES 251-967-4141 DIAMONDJEWELERS.NET 10583120 2 Beachin’ ● August 2019 August 2019 ● Beachin’ 3 4 Beachin’ ● August 2019 August 2019 ● Beachin’ 5 6 Beachin’ ● August 2019 August 2019 ● Beachin’ 7 beachin’ A specialty publication of Gulf Coast Media about the cover contents publisher Parks Rogers Blue skies and the bright summer sun greets Too Close for Comfort [email protected] visitors to Alabama’s Gulf Coast. Kick back and enjoy the beautiful view. Hurricane Barry August 2019 2019 August August beachin’2019 August LIFE ON THE ALABAMA GULF COAST managing editor Photo by Jack Swindle Allison Marlow [email protected] 16 design and layout Paige Marmolejo [email protected] Sands of Time advertising Charter boat fishing begins LouAnn Love [email protected] 251.943.2151 Frank Kustura [email protected] 24 251.923.8129 feature Bethany Randall [email protected] Beach Happenings 251.266.9982 story August events and activities Beachin’ magazine is published Bushwackers at the beach monthly by Gulf Coast Media, 901 N. McKenzie Street, Foley, AL 36535 251.943.2151 Try one or try them all, just don’t Distributed free by The Alabama Gulf Coast Convention & Visitor’s Bureau and at other miss this “must do” summer drink 28 locations throughout Gulf Shores, Orange Beach and Fort Morgan. All rights reserved. Reproduction without permission is prohibited. 10 Nature Gulf Coast Media accepts no responsibility in the guarantee of goods Green Sea Turtles visit Alabama and services advertised herein.
    [Show full text]
  • Hurricane Danny
    HURRICANE TRACKING ADVISORY eVENT™ Hurricane Danny Information from NHC Advisory 10, 5:00 PM EDT Thursday August 20, 2015 Danny is moving toward the west-northwest near 10 mph and this general motion is expected to continue into Saturday. Maximum sustained winds have increased to near 80 mph with higher gusts. Some additional strengthening is forecast during the next 24 hours, but a weakening trend is expected to begin after that. Intensity Measures Position & Heading U.S. Landfall (NHC) Max Sustained Wind 80 mph Position Relative to 1030 miles E of the Lesser Speed: (category 1) Land: Antilles Est. Time & Region: n/a Min Central Pressure: 990 mb Coordinates: 13.0 N, 45.7 W Trop. Storm Force Est. Max Sustained Wind 60 miles Bearing/Speed: WNW or 295 degrees at 10 mph n/a Winds Extent: Speed: Forecast Summary The current NHC forecast map (below left) shows Danny moving toward the Lesser Antilles over the next few days at hurricane strength and then weakening to a tropical storm on Sunday. The windfield map (below right) is based on the NHC’s forecast track and shows Danny maintaining category 1 hurricane strength through Sunday, with 74 – 95 mph winds, and then weakening to a tropical storm by Tuesday. To illustrate the uncertainty in Danny’s forecast track, forecast tracks for all current models are shown on the map in pale gray. Forecast Track for Hurricane Danny Forecast Windfield for Hurricane Danny (National Hurricane Center) (Based on NHC at 12:00 UTC) from Kinetic Analysis Corp. Pittsburgh Washington D.C. Cincinnati US ! D Trop Dep Ï TD TS !S Ï Trop Storm Cat 1 !1 Ï Cat 1 Nassau Havana TropicTropic ofof CancerCancer MX CU Santo Domingo DO Port-au-PrinceSan Juan Kingston 08-25 08-24 HN 08-23 Fort-De-France 08-22 NI Castries 08-21 Managua Willemstad Caracas 08-20 CR CR Maracaibo Port0 of Spain250 500 1,000 San Jose CO Miles PA VEVE PA Panama GY GY © Copyright 2015 Willis Limited / Willis Re Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Hurricane Joaquin
    HURRICANE TRACKING ADVISORY eVENT™ Hurricane Joaquin Information from NHC Advisory 14A, 8:00 AM EDT Thursday October 1, 2015 On the forecast track, the center of Joaquin will move near or over portions of the central Bahamas today and tonight and pass near or over portions of the northwestern Bahamas on Friday. Maximum sustained winds are near 120 mph with higher gusts. Joaquin is a category 3 hurricane on the Saffir-Simpson Hurricane Wind Scale. Some strengthening is forecast in the next day or so, with some fluctuations in intensity possible on Friday. Intensity Measures Position & Heading U.S. Landfall (NHC) Max Sustained Wind 120 mph Position Relative to 10 miles N of Samana Cays Speed: (category 3) Land: Bahamas Est. Time & Region: n/a Min Central Pressure: 942 mb Coordinates: 23.2 N, 73.7 W Trop. Storm Force Est. Max Sustained Wind 140 miles Bearing/Speed: WSW or 240 degrees at 5 mph n/a Winds Extent: Speed: Forecast Summary Hurricane conditions are expected to continue in portions of the central and southeastern Bahamas through Friday. Hurricane conditions are expected over portions of the northwestern Bahamas on Friday. Tropical storm conditions will affect the southeastern Bahamas through tonight. A dangerous storm surge will raise water levels by as much as 5 to 8 feet above normal tide levels in the central Bahamas in areas of onshore flow. A storm surge of 2 to 4 feet above normal tide levels is expected in the northwest Bahamas within the hurricane warning area, and 1 to 2 feet is expected in the southeast Bahamas.
    [Show full text]
  • Hurricane Joaquin
    HURRICANE TRACKING ADVISORY eVENT™ Hurricane Joaquin Information from NHC Advisory 18A, 8:00 AM EDT Friday October 2, 2015 On the forecast track, the core of the strongest winds of Joaquin will continue moving over portions of the central and northwestern Bahamas today. Joaquin will begin to move away from the Bahamas tonight and Saturday. Maximum sustained winds are near 130 mph with higher gusts. Joaquin is a dangerous category 4 hurricane. Some fluctuations in intensity are possible during the next 24 hours. Slow weakening is expected to begin on Saturday. Intensity Measures Position & Heading U.S. Landfall (NHC) Max Sustained Wind 130 mph Position Relative to 30 miles NNE of Clarence Long Speed: (category 4) Land: Island Bahamas Est. Time & Region: n/a Min Central Pressure: 937 mb Coordinates: 23.4 N, 74.8 W Trop. Storm Force Est. Max Sustained Wind 205 miles Bearing/Speed: NW or 315 degrees at 3 mph n/a Winds Extent: Speed: Forecast Summary Hurricane conditions are expected to continue across portions of central and southeastern Bahamas through today. Hurricane and tropical storm conditions are expected over portions of the northwestern Bahamas today. Tropical storm conditions will affect other portions of the southeastern Bahamas, and the Turks and Caicos Islands today. Tropical storm conditions are expected over portions of eastern Cuba this morning. A dangerous storm surge will raise water levels by as much as 6 to 12 feet above normal tide levels in the central Bahamas in areas of onshore flow. A storm surge of 2 to 4 feet above normal tide levels is expected in the remainder of the Bahamas within the hurricane warning area.
    [Show full text]
  • State of the Climate in 2016
    STATE OF THE CLIMATE IN 2016 Special Supplement to the Bullei of the Aerica Meteorological Society Vol. 98, No. 8, August 2017 STATE OF THE CLIMATE IN 2016 Editors Jessica Blunden Derek S. Arndt Chapter Editors Howard J. Diamond Jeremy T. Mathis Ahira Sánchez-Lugo Robert J. H. Dunn Ademe Mekonnen Ted A. Scambos Nadine Gobron James A. Renwick Carl J. Schreck III Dale F. Hurst Jacqueline A. Richter-Menge Sharon Stammerjohn Gregory C. Johnson Kate M. Willett Technical Editor Mara Sprain AMERICAN METEOROLOGICAL SOCIETY COVER CREDITS: FRONT/BACK: Courtesy of Reuters/Mike Hutchings Malawian subsistence farmer Rozaria Hamiton plants sweet potatoes near the capital Lilongwe, Malawi, 1 February 2016. Late rains in Malawi threaten the staple maize crop and have pushed prices to record highs. About 14 million people face hunger in Southern Africa because of a drought that has been exacerbated by an El Niño weather pattern, according to the United Nations World Food Programme. A supplement to this report is available online (10.1175/2017BAMSStateoftheClimate.2) How to cite this document: Citing the complete report: Blunden, J., and D. S. Arndt, Eds., 2017: State of the Climate in 2016. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 98 (8), Si–S277, doi:10.1175/2017BAMSStateoftheClimate.1. Citing a chapter (example): Diamond, H. J., and C. J. Schreck III, Eds., 2017: The Tropics [in “State of the Climate in 2016”]. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 98 (8), S93–S128, doi:10.1175/2017BAMSStateoftheClimate.1. Citing a section (example): Bell, G., M. L’Heureux, and M. S. Halpert, 2017: ENSO and the tropical Paciic [in “State of the Climate in 2016”].
    [Show full text]
  • Hurricane & Tropical Storm
    5.8 HURRICANE & TROPICAL STORM SECTION 5.8 HURRICANE AND TROPICAL STORM 5.8.1 HAZARD DESCRIPTION A tropical cyclone is a rotating, organized system of clouds and thunderstorms that originates over tropical or sub-tropical waters and has a closed low-level circulation. Tropical depressions, tropical storms, and hurricanes are all considered tropical cyclones. These storms rotate counterclockwise in the northern hemisphere around the center and are accompanied by heavy rain and strong winds (NOAA, 2013). Almost all tropical storms and hurricanes in the Atlantic basin (which includes the Gulf of Mexico and Caribbean Sea) form between June 1 and November 30 (hurricane season). August and September are peak months for hurricane development. The average wind speeds for tropical storms and hurricanes are listed below: . A tropical depression has a maximum sustained wind speeds of 38 miles per hour (mph) or less . A tropical storm has maximum sustained wind speeds of 39 to 73 mph . A hurricane has maximum sustained wind speeds of 74 mph or higher. In the western North Pacific, hurricanes are called typhoons; similar storms in the Indian Ocean and South Pacific Ocean are called cyclones. A major hurricane has maximum sustained wind speeds of 111 mph or higher (NOAA, 2013). Over a two-year period, the United States coastline is struck by an average of three hurricanes, one of which is classified as a major hurricane. Hurricanes, tropical storms, and tropical depressions may pose a threat to life and property. These storms bring heavy rain, storm surge and flooding (NOAA, 2013). The cooler waters off the coast of New Jersey can serve to diminish the energy of storms that have traveled up the eastern seaboard.
    [Show full text]
  • CCRIFSPC Journey Through T
    CCRIF receives the ‘Reinsurance Initiative of the Year’ Award for the reinsurance initiative that generated the most promising CARICOM Heads of Government approach change to a signifi cant area of the World Bank for assistance to design business – the award was offered and implement a cost-effective risk transfer by The Review, the leading programme for member governments magazine of the international reinsurance industry Hurricane Ivan causes CCRIF makes payout to Turks and billions of dollars of losses Caicos Islands for Hurricane Ike across the Caribbean CCRIF makes the Real-Time Forecasting System (RTFS) available CCRIF is named to members for the fi rst ‘Transaction of time – each year it is the Year’ at the available to members Insurance Day at the beginning of London Market the Atlantic Hurricane Awards Season 2007 2004 2008 The Caribbean Catastrophe Risk Insurance Facility is formed as the fi rst multi-country, multi-peril pooled catastrophe risk insurance facility in the world A Multi-donor Trust Fund (MDTF) is established to support CCRIF’s initial operations CCRIF signs fi rst MOU with the Caribbean Institute CCRIF provides tropical cyclone (hurricane) and earthquake for Meteorology and Hydrology (CIMH) – over the coverage to 16 Caribbean member governments years, CCRIF has signed MOUs with the Caribbean Community Climate Change Centre (CCCCC), United Nations Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC), Caribbean Disaster Emergency Management Agency (CDEMA), Inter- American Development Bank (IDB), University
    [Show full text]
  • Hurricane Eyewall Slope As Determined from Airborne Radar Reflectivity Data: Composites and Case Studies
    368 WEATHER AND FORECASTING VOLUME 28 Hurricane Eyewall Slope as Determined from Airborne Radar Reflectivity Data: Composites and Case Studies ANDREW T. HAZELTON AND ROBERT E. HART Department of Earth, Ocean, and Atmospheric Science, The Florida State University, Tallahassee, Florida (Manuscript received 19 April 2012, in final form 6 December 2012) ABSTRACT Understanding and predicting the evolution of the tropical cyclone (TC) inner core continues to be a major research focus in tropical meteorology. Eyewall slope and its relationship to intensity and intensity change is one example that has been insufficiently studied. Accordingly, in this study, radar reflectivity data are used to quantify and analyze the azimuthal average and variance of eyewall slopes from 124 flight legs among 15 Atlantic TCs from 2004 to 2011. The slopes from each flight leg are averaged into 6-h increments around the best-track times to allow for a comparison of slope and best-track intensity. A statistically significant re- lationship is found between both the azimuthal mean slope and pressure and between slope and wind. In addition, several individual TCs show higher correlation between slope and intensity, and TCs with both relatively high and low correlations are examined in case studies. In addition, a correlation is found between slope and radar-based eye size at 2 km, but size shows little correlation with intensity. There is also a tendency for the eyewall to tilt downshear by an average of approximately 108. In addition, the upper eyewall slopes more sharply than the lower eyewall in about three-quarters of the cases. Analysis of case studies discusses the potential effects on eyewall slope of both inner-core and environmental processes, such as vertical shear, ocean heat content, and eyewall replacement cycles.
    [Show full text]