List of Active Domestic Space Act Agreements Signed After July 31, 2017 Citing NASA’S “Other Transactions Authority” Under the Space Act (51 U.S.C

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

List of Active Domestic Space Act Agreements Signed After July 31, 2017 Citing NASA’S “Other Transactions Authority” Under the Space Act (51 U.S.C List of Active Domestic Space Act Agreements Signed After July 31, 2017 Citing NASA’s “Other Transactions Authority” under the Space Act (51 U.S.C. § 20113(e)) (report as of March 31, 2021) CENTER ROW PAM ID SIGNATURE EXPIRATION TYPE OF TOTAL ESTIMATED EXPECTED AGENCY LINK TO SIGNED PARTNER NAME TITLE/PURPOSE CENTER TRACKING NO. NUMBER DATE DATE AGREEMENT DOLLAR VALUE BENEFIT(S) AGREEMENT NUMBER (IF ANY) Alaka'i Technologies Annex to Participation in the NASA AAM 1 34443 10/2/2020 10/2/2025 Non-Reimbursable $592,104 AFRC Aeronautics View Signed Agreement Corporation National Campaign Alaka'i Technologies Participation in the NASA AAM National 2 34442 10/2/2020 10/2/2025 Non-Reimbursable $0 AFRC Aeronautics View Signed Agreement Corporation Campaign AAM National Campaign - 1 Vehicle Provider 3 34439 Wisk Aero, LLC 10/22/2020 10/22/2025 Non-Reimbursable $592,104 AFRC Aeronautics View Signed Agreement Information Exchange Annex Participation in the NASA AAM National 4 34436 Wisk Aero, LLC 10/22/2020 10/22/2025 Non-Reimbursable $0 AFRC Aeronautics View Signed Agreement Campaign Annex to Hybrid-Electric System Integration, 5 33089 Bell Textron, Inc 1/15/2020 8/8/2024 Non-Reimbursable $592,104 AFRC Aeronautics View Signed Agreement Development and Testing Activities Grand Challenge Vehicle Provider 6 33088 The Boeing Company 2/28/2020 2/28/2025 Non-Reimbursable $592,104 AFRC Aeronautics View Signed Agreement Information Exchange Annex List of Active Domestic Space Act Agreements Signed After July 31, 2017 Citing NASA’s “Other Transactions Authority” under the Space Act (51 U.S.C. § 20113(e)) (report as of March 31, 2021) CENTER ROW PAM ID SIGNATURE EXPIRATION TYPE OF TOTAL ESTIMATED EXPECTED AGENCY LINK TO SIGNED PARTNER NAME TITLE/PURPOSE CENTER TRACKING NO. NUMBER DATE DATE AGREEMENT DOLLAR VALUE BENEFIT(S) AGREEMENT NUMBER (IF ANY) Participation in the NASA UAM Grand 7 33087 The Boeing Company 2/28/2020 2/28/2025 Non-Reimbursable $0 AFRC Aeronautics View Signed Agreement Challenge Grand Challenge Vehicle Provider 8 33085 Zeva, Inc (dba Zeva Aero) 2/3/2020 2/3/2025 Non-Reimbursable $592,104 AFRC Aeronautics View Signed Agreement Information Exchange Annex Participation in the NASA UAM Grand 9 33084 Zeva, Inc (dba Zeva Aero) 2/3/2020 2/3/2025 Non-Reimbursable $0 AFRC Aeronautics View Signed Agreement Challenge The University of North Grand Challenge - Development Test 10 33081 2/3/2020 2/3/2025 Non-Reimbursable $678,932 AFRC Aeronautics View Signed Agreement Texas Airspace Annex The University of North Participation in the NASA UAM Grand 11 33080 2/3/2020 2/3/2025 Non-Reimbursable $0 AFRC Aeronautics View Signed Agreement Texas Challenge Grand Challenge - Development Test 12 33079 Uber Technologies, Inc 2/3/2020 2/3/2025 Non-Reimbursable $678,932 AFRC Aeronautics View Signed Agreement Airspace Annex List of Active Domestic Space Act Agreements Signed After July 31, 2017 Citing NASA’s “Other Transactions Authority” under the Space Act (51 U.S.C. § 20113(e)) (report as of March 31, 2021) CENTER ROW PAM ID SIGNATURE EXPIRATION TYPE OF TOTAL ESTIMATED EXPECTED AGENCY LINK TO SIGNED PARTNER NAME TITLE/PURPOSE CENTER TRACKING NO. NUMBER DATE DATE AGREEMENT DOLLAR VALUE BENEFIT(S) AGREEMENT NUMBER (IF ANY) Participation in the NASA UAM Grand 13 33078 Uber Technologies, Inc 2/3/2020 2/3/2025 Non-Reimbursable $0 AFRC Aeronautics View Signed Agreement Challenge Grand Challenge Vehicle Provider 14 33076 Prodentity, LLC 2/3/2020 2/3/2025 Non-Reimbursable $592,104 AFRC Aeronautics View Signed Agreement Information Exchange Annex Participation in the NASA UAM Grand 15 33075 Prodentity, LLC 2/3/2020 2/3/2025 Non-Reimbursable $0 AFRC Aeronautics View Signed Agreement Challenge Grand Challenge - Development Test 16 33073 OneSky Systems Inc 2/3/2020 2/3/2025 Non-Reimbursable $678,932 AFRC Aeronautics View Signed Agreement Airspace Annex Participation in the NASA UAM Grand 17 33072 OneSky Systems Inc 2/3/2020 2/3/2025 Non-Reimbursable $0 AFRC Aeronautics View Signed Agreement Challenge Grand Challenge Vehicle Provider 18 33065 NFT, Inc 2/3/2020 2/3/2025 Non-Reimbursable $592,104 AFRC Aeronautics View Signed Agreement Information Exchange Annex List of Active Domestic Space Act Agreements Signed After July 31, 2017 Citing NASA’s “Other Transactions Authority” under the Space Act (51 U.S.C. § 20113(e)) (report as of March 31, 2021) CENTER ROW PAM ID SIGNATURE EXPIRATION TYPE OF TOTAL ESTIMATED EXPECTED AGENCY LINK TO SIGNED PARTNER NAME TITLE/PURPOSE CENTER TRACKING NO. NUMBER DATE DATE AGREEMENT DOLLAR VALUE BENEFIT(S) AGREEMENT NUMBER (IF ANY) Participation in the NASA UAM Grand 19 33064 NFT, Inc 2/3/2020 2/3/2025 Non-Reimbursable $0 AFRC Aeronautics View Signed Agreement Challenge Grand Challenge - Development Test 20 33063 Metron Aviation, Inc 2/3/2020 2/3/2025 Non-Reimbursable $678,932 AFRC Aeronautics View Signed Agreement Airspace Annex Participation in the NASA UAM Grand 21 33062 Metron Aviation, Inc 2/3/2020 2/3/2025 Non-Reimbursable $0 AFRC Aeronautics View Signed Agreement Challenge Grand Challenge - Development Test 22 33059 GeoRq 2/3/2020 2/3/2025 Non-Reimbursable $678,932 AFRC Aeronautics View Signed Agreement Airspace Annex Participation in the NASA UAM Grand 23 33058 GeoRq 2/3/2020 2/3/2025 Non-Reimbursable $0 AFRC Aeronautics View Signed Agreement Challenge Grand Challenge - Development Test 24 33057 Ellis & Associates 2/3/2020 2/3/2025 Non-Reimbursable $678,932 AFRC Aeronautics View Signed Agreement Airspace Annex List of Active Domestic Space Act Agreements Signed After July 31, 2017 Citing NASA’s “Other Transactions Authority” under the Space Act (51 U.S.C. § 20113(e)) (report as of March 31, 2021) CENTER ROW PAM ID SIGNATURE EXPIRATION TYPE OF TOTAL ESTIMATED EXPECTED AGENCY LINK TO SIGNED PARTNER NAME TITLE/PURPOSE CENTER TRACKING NO. NUMBER DATE DATE AGREEMENT DOLLAR VALUE BENEFIT(S) AGREEMENT NUMBER (IF ANY) Participation in the NASA UAM Grand 25 33056 Ellis & Associates 2/3/2020 2/3/2025 Non-Reimbursable $0 AFRC Aeronautics View Signed Agreement Challenge Grand Challenge - Development Test 26 33055 Avision, Inc 2/3/2020 2/3/2025 Non-Reimbursable $678,932 AFRC Aeronautics View Signed Agreement Airspace Annex Participation in the NASA UAM Grand 27 33054 Avision, Inc 2/3/2020 2/3/2025 Non-Reimbursable $0 AFRC Aeronautics View Signed Agreement Challenge Grand Challenge - Development Test 28 33039 ARINC 2/3/2020 2/3/2025 Non-Reimbursable $678,932 AFRC Aeronautics View Signed Agreement Airspace Annex Participation in the NASA UAM Grand 29 33038 ARINC 2/3/2020 2/3/2025 Non-Reimbursable $0 AFRC Aeronautics View Signed Agreement Challenge ANRA TECHNOLOGIES, Grand Challenge - Development Test 30 33037 2/3/2020 2/3/2025 Non-Reimbursable $678,932 AFRC Aeronautics View Signed Agreement LLC Airspace Annex List of Active Domestic Space Act Agreements Signed After July 31, 2017 Citing NASA’s “Other Transactions Authority” under the Space Act (51 U.S.C. § 20113(e)) (report as of March 31, 2021) CENTER ROW PAM ID SIGNATURE EXPIRATION TYPE OF TOTAL ESTIMATED EXPECTED AGENCY LINK TO SIGNED PARTNER NAME TITLE/PURPOSE CENTER TRACKING NO. NUMBER DATE DATE AGREEMENT DOLLAR VALUE BENEFIT(S) AGREEMENT NUMBER (IF ANY) ANRA TECHNOLOGIES, Participation in the NASA UAM Grand 31 33036 2/3/2020 2/3/2025 Non-Reimbursable $0 AFRC Aeronautics View Signed Agreement LLC Challenge Grand Challenge - Development Test 32 33035 AiRXOS, Inc 3/2/2020 3/2/2025 Non-Reimbursable $678,932 AFRC Aeronautics View Signed Agreement Airspace Annex Participation in the NASA UAM Grand 33 33034 AiRXOS, Inc 3/2/2020 3/2/2025 Non-Reimbursable $0 AFRC Aeronautics View Signed Agreement Challenge Participation in the NASA UAM Grand 34 33033 AIRMAP, INC Challenge - Development Test Airspace 2/3/2020 2/3/2025 Non-Reimbursable $678,932 AFRC Aeronautics View Signed Agreement Annex Participation in the NASA UAM Grand 35 33032 AIRMAP, INC 2/3/2020 2/3/2025 Non-Reimbursable $0 AFRC Aeronautics View Signed Agreement Challenge Grand Challenge - Development Test Flight 36 33031 JOBY AVIATION, INC 2/19/2020 2/19/2025 Non-Reimbursable $592,104 AFRC Aeronautics View Signed Agreement Annex List of Active Domestic Space Act Agreements Signed After July 31, 2017 Citing NASA’s “Other Transactions Authority” under the Space Act (51 U.S.C. § 20113(e)) (report as of March 31, 2021) CENTER ROW PAM ID SIGNATURE EXPIRATION TYPE OF TOTAL ESTIMATED EXPECTED AGENCY LINK TO SIGNED PARTNER NAME TITLE/PURPOSE CENTER TRACKING NO. NUMBER DATE DATE AGREEMENT DOLLAR VALUE BENEFIT(S) AGREEMENT NUMBER (IF ANY) Participation in the NASA UAM Grand 37 33030 JOBY AVIATION, INC 2/19/2020 2/19/2025 Non-Reimbursable $0 AFRC Aeronautics View Signed Agreement Challenge Small Unmanned Aircraft System 38 32757 AeroVironment, Inc. 11/10/2020 11/10/2025 Reimbursable $116,000 AFRC Aeronautics View Signed Agreement (SUAS)Testing and Training Virgin Galactic Holdings, Collaborative Ventilator Development in 39 32514 4/22/2020 4/22/2021 Non-Reimbursable $190,000 AFRC Space Technology View Signed Agreement Inc Response to COVID-19 Pandemic Collaborative Medical Device Development 40 32489 Virgin Galactic Holdings 4/22/2020 4/22/2023 Non-Reimbursable $0 AFRC Space Technology View Signed Agreement in Response to COVID-19 Pandemic Supporting Development of a Tow-glider Launch Platform through Aerodynamic Store 41 32339 Fenix Space, Inc. 5/27/2020 5/27/2025 Reimbursable $75,552 AFRC Aeronautics View Signed Agreement Separation Analysis, Range Safety Studies, and Con-Ops Development 42 32338 Fenix Space, Inc. Development of Tow-glider Launch Platform 5/27/2020 5/27/2025 Reimbursable $0 AFRC Aeronautics View Signed Agreement List of Active Domestic Space Act Agreements Signed After July 31, 2017 Citing NASA’s “Other Transactions Authority” under the Space Act (51 U.S.C.
Recommended publications
  • The World's Most Active Aviation & Aerospace
    The USA's Most Active Aviation & Aerospace Professionals on Social - July 2021 Industry at a glance: Why should you care? So, where does your company rank? Position Company Name LinkedIn URL Location Employees on LinkedIn No. Employees Shared (Last 30 Days) % Shared (Last 30 Days) 1 Relativity Space https://www.linkedin.com/company/relativity/United States 430 134 31.16% 2 Planet https://www.linkedin.com/company/planet-labs/United States 668 144 21.56% 3 Ametek MRO https://www.linkedin.com/company/ametekmro/United States 248 40 16.13% 4 OneWeb Satellites https://www.linkedin.com/company/oneweb-satellites/United States 213 33 15.49% 5 Wisk https://www.linkedin.com/company/wisk-aero/United States 229 34 14.85% 6 Firefly Aerospace https://www.linkedin.com/company/fireflyspace/United States 339 45 13.27% 7 Redwire Space https://www.linkedin.com/company/redwirespace/United States 409 54 13.20% 8 Pinnacle Solutions https://www.linkedin.com/company/pinnacle-solutions-inc./United States 225 29 12.89% 9 Satcom Direct https://www.linkedin.com/company/satcom-direct/United States 296 35 11.82% 10 Avian https://www.linkedin.com/company/avian-inc/United States 231 27 11.69% 11 Calspan https://www.linkedin.com/company/calspan-corporation/United States 305 35 11.48% 12 Jet Edge International https://www.linkedin.com/company/jet-edge-international/United States 250 27 10.80% 13 SalamAir https://www.linkedin.com/company/salam-air/United States 306 32 10.46% 14 FEAM https://www.linkedin.com/company/feam/United States 350 31 8.86% 15 STS Aviation Group https://www.linkedin.com/company/sts-aviation-group/United
    [Show full text]
  • A Perspective on the Design and Development of the Spacex Dragon Spacecraft Heatshield
    A Perspective on the Design and Development of the SpaceX Dragon Spacecraft Heatshield by Daniel J. Rasky, PhD Senior Scientist, NASA Ames Research Center Director, Space Portal, NASA Research Park Moffett Field, CA 94035 (650) 604-1098 / [email protected] February 28, 2012 2 How Did SpaceX Do This? Recovered Dragon Spacecraft! After a “picture perfect” first flight, December 8, 2010 ! 3 Beginning Here? SpaceX Thermal Protection Systems Laboratory, Hawthorne, CA! “Empty Floor Space” December, 2007! 4 Some Necessary Background: Re-entry Physics • Entry Physics Elements – Ballistic Coefficient – Blunt vs sharp nose tip – Entry angle/heating profile – Precision landing reqr. – Ablation effects – Entry G’loads » Blunt vs Lifting shapes – Lifting Shapes » Volumetric Constraints » Structure » Roll Control » Landing Precision – Vehicle flight and turn-around requirements Re-entry requires specialized design and expertise for the Thermal Protection Systems (TPS), and is critical for a successful space vehicle 5 Reusable vs. Ablative Materials 6 Historical Perspective on TPS: The Beginnings • Discipline of TPS began during World War II (1940’s) – German scientists discovered V2 rocket was detonating early due to re-entry heating – Plywood heatshields improvised on the vehicle to EDL solve the heating problem • X-15 Era (1950’s, 60’s) – Vehicle Inconel and Titanium metallic structure protected from hypersonic heating AVCOAT » Spray-on silicone based ablator for acreage » Asbestos/silicone moldable TPS for leading edges – Spray-on silicone ablator
    [Show full text]
  • Stratolaunch Chooses Megadoors for the Hangar Housing the World's
    Aircraft Manufacturing Mojave, CA End user: Stratolaunch chooses Megadoors for the Stratolaunch stratolaunch.com hangar housing the world’s largest aircraft. Design build © ASSA ABLOY Entrance Systems AB CS.AVS/ORG.EN-1.1/1901 contractor: Background Wallace & Smith ASSA ABLOY Entrance Systems proudly provided Business entrepreneur Richard Branson of Virgin Group has General Contractors Stratolaunch Systems, a Paul G. Allen Project, with a since licensed the technology behind SpaceShipOne for wallacesmith.com 420’w x 68’h (128m x 21m) Megadoor hangar door Virgin Galactic, a venture that will take paying customers into system for their new fabrication facility located in Mojave suborbital space. Metal building California. Inside this facility, the world’s largest aircraft supplier: is being fabricated by Scaled Composites which has a Critical issues: CBC Steel Buildings wingspan of 380’ (116m) and thrust provided by (6) 747 Desert Conditions: cbcsteelbuildings.com aircraft engines. This aircraft will be used as a carrier The composite carrier vehicle being crafted inside by the Hangar Statistics: vehicle, flying to 30,000ft with a rocket that will then be highly skilled technicians requires an environment protected • 103 257sq ft. launched with a payload destined for space. This system from the harsh conditions of the Mojave desert. For example, (9 592 m2) will revolutionize space transportation. the fine dust blowing around the desert airport is notorious for coating everything not properly protected. Keeping • 420’ clear span (128m) In 2004, SpaceShipOne ushered in a new era of space sensitive aviation electronics, engines and other aircraft • 3,000,000lbs of travel, when it became the first non-govern-mental components from being affected by the dust and sand structural steel manned rocket ship to fly beyond the earth’s atmosphere.
    [Show full text]
  • Final EA for the Launch and Reentry of Spaceshiptwo Reusable Suborbital Rockets at the Mojave Air and Space Port
    Final Environmental Assessment for the Launch and Reentry of SpaceShipTwo Reusable Suborbital Rockets at the Mojave Air and Space Port May 2012 HQ-121575 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Federal Aviation Administration Office of Commercial Space Transportation; Finding of No Significant Impact AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) ACTION: Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI) SUMMARY: The FAA Office of Commercial Space Transportation (AST) prepared a Final Environmental Assessment (EA) in accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969, as amended (NEPA; 42 United States Code 4321 et seq.), Council on Environmental Quality NEPA implementing regulations (40 Code of Federal Regulations parts 1500 to 1508), and FAA Order 1050.1E, Change 1, Environmental Impacts: Policies and Procedures, to evaluate the potential environmental impacts of issuing experimental permits and/or launch licenses to operate SpaceShipTwo reusable suborbital rockets and WhiteKnightTwo carrier aircraft at the Mojave Air and Space Port in Mojave, California. After reviewing and analyzing currently available data and information on existing conditions and the potential impacts of the Proposed Action, the FAA has determined that issuing experimental permits and/or launch licenses to operate SpaceShipTwo and WhiteKnightTwo at the Mojave Air and Space Port would not significantly impact the quality of the human environment. Therefore, preparation of an Environmental Impact Statement is not required, and the FAA is issuing this FONSI. The FAA made this determination in accordance with all applicable environmental laws. The Final EA is incorporated by reference in this FONSI. FOR A COPY OF THE EA AND FONSI: Visit the following internet address: http://www.faa.gov/about/office_org/headquarters_offices/ast/environmental/review/permits/ or contact Daniel Czelusniak, Environmental Program Lead, Federal Aviation Administration, 800 Independence Ave., SW, Suite 325, Washington, DC 20591; email [email protected]; or phone (202) 267-5924.
    [Show full text]
  • Virgin Galactic Th E First Ten Years Other Springer-Praxis Books of Related Interest by Erik Seedhouse
    Virgin Galactic Th e First Ten Years Other Springer-Praxis books of related interest by Erik Seedhouse Tourists in Space: A Practical Guide 2008 ISBN: 978-0-387-74643-2 Lunar Outpost: The Challenges of Establishing a Human Settlement on the Moon 2008 ISBN: 978-0-387-09746-6 Martian Outpost: The Challenges of Establishing a Human Settlement on Mars 2009 ISBN: 978-0-387-98190-1 The New Space Race: China vs. the United States 2009 ISBN: 978-1-4419-0879-7 Prepare for Launch: The Astronaut Training Process 2010 ISBN: 978-1-4419-1349-4 Ocean Outpost: The Future of Humans Living Underwater 2010 ISBN: 978-1-4419-6356-7 Trailblazing Medicine: Sustaining Explorers During Interplanetary Missions 2011 ISBN: 978-1-4419-7828-8 Interplanetary Outpost: The Human and Technological Challenges of Exploring the Outer Planets 2012 ISBN: 978-1-4419-9747-0 Astronauts for Hire: The Emergence of a Commercial Astronaut Corps 2012 ISBN: 978-1-4614-0519-1 Pulling G: Human Responses to High and Low Gravity 2013 ISBN: 978-1-4614-3029-2 SpaceX: Making Commercial Spacefl ight a Reality 2013 ISBN: 978-1-4614-5513-4 Suborbital: Industry at the Edge of Space 2014 ISBN: 978-3-319-03484-3 Tourists in Space: A Practical Guide, Second Edition 2014 ISBN: 978-3-319-05037-9 Erik Seedhouse Virgin Galactic The First Ten Years Erik Seedhouse Astronaut Instructor Sandefjord , Vestfold , Norway SPRINGER-PRAXIS BOOKS IN SPACE EXPLORATION ISBN 978-3-319-09261-4 ISBN 978-3-319-09262-1 (eBook) DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-09262-1 Springer Cham Heidelberg New York Dordrecht London Library of Congress Control Number: 2014957708 © Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015 This work is subject to copyright.
    [Show full text]
  • Space Coast Is Getting Busy: 6 New Rockets Coming to Cape Canaveral, KSC
    4/16/2019 Space Coast is getting busy: 6 new rockets coming to Cape Canaveral, KSC Space Coast is getting busy: 6 new rockets coming to Cape Canaveral, Kennedy Space Center Emre Kelly, Florida Today Published 4:04 p.m. ET April 11, 2019 | Updated 7:53 a.m. ET April 12, 2019 COLORADO SPRINGS, Colo. – If schedules hold, the Space Coast will live up to its name over the next two years as a half-dozen new rockets target launches from sites peppered across the Eastern Range. Company, government and military officials here at the 35th Space Symposium, an annual space conference, have reaffirmed their plans to launch rockets ranging from more traditional heavy-lift behemoths to smaller vehicles that take advantage of new manufacturing technologies. Even if some of these schedules slip, at least one thing is apparent to several spaceflight experts here: The Eastern Range is seeing an unprecedented growth in commercial space companies and efforts. Space Launch System: 2020 NASA's Space Launch System rocket launches from Kennedy Space Center's pad 39B in this rendering by the agency. (Photo: NASA) NASA's long-awaited SLS, a multibillion-dollar rocket announced in 2011, is slated to become the most powerful launch vehicle in history if it can meet a stringent late 2020 deadline. The 322-foot-tall rocket is expected to launch on its first flight – Exploration Mission 1 – from Kennedy Space Center with an uncrewed Orion capsule for a mission around the moon, which fits in with the agency's wider goal of putting humans on the surface by 2024.
    [Show full text]
  • ESPI Insights Space Sector Watch
    ESPI Insights Space Sector Watch Issue 16 May 2021 THIS MONTH IN THE SPACE SECTOR… MARS LANDING CEMENTS CHINA’S POSITION AS MAJOR SPACE POWER ................................................................ 1 POLICY & PROGRAMMES .................................................................................................................................... 2 ESA awards €150 million in contracts to continue development of Prometheus and Phoebus .......... 2 European Commission targets second study for its space-based secure connectivity project .......... 2 South Korea joins Artemis accords and strengthens partnership with the U.S. ..................................... 2 May marks busy month in UK space sector................................................................................................... 3 NASA temporarily suspends SpaceX’s HLS contract following protests on the award ........................ 3 Spain eyes creation of a National Space Agency .......................................................................................... 3 Space Force awards $228 million GPS contract extension to Raytheon Intelligence and Space ...... 4 China officially establishes company to develop and operate broadband mega constellation ........... 4 Lithuania signs Association Agreement with ESA ........................................................................................ 4 CNES and Bundeswehr University Munich (UniBw) launch SpaceFounders accelerator ..................... 4 The Brazilian Space Agency selects Virgin Orbit
    [Show full text]
  • ISS National Lab Q1FY19 Report Quarterly Report for the Period October 1 – December 31, 2018
    NASAWATCH.COM ISS National Lab Q1FY19 Report Quarterly Report for the Period October 1 – December 31, 2018 Contents Q1FY19 Metrics ........................................................................................................................................... 2 Key Portfolio Data Charts ............................................................................................................................. 6 Program Successes ...................................................................................................................................... 6 In-Orbit Activities ........................................................................................................................................ 7 Research Solicitations in Progress ................................................................................................................ 7 Appendix .................................................................................................................................................... 8 Authorized for submission to NASA by: _______________________________ Print Name _______________ Signature ________________________________________________________ 1 NASAWATCH.COM NASAWATCH.COM ISS National Lab Q1FY19 Report Q1FY19 Metrics SECURE STRATEGIC FLIGHT PROJECTS: Generate significant, impactful, and measurable demand from customers that recognize value of the ISS National Lab as an innovation platform TARGET ACTUAL Q1 ACTUAL Q2 ACTUAL Q3 ACTUAL Q4 YTD FY19 FY19 ISS National Lab payloads manifested
    [Show full text]
  • SSEP Mission 14 to ISS Profile
    SSEP Mission 14 to ISS Profile Contact: Jeff Goldstein, SSEP National Program Director, 301-395-0770, [email protected] Payload and Flight Ops: Number of SSEP experiments: 33 experiments, with 3 flying on SpaceX-23 SSEP Payload Designation: Apollo (SSEP16) Flight: SpaceX CRS-23, Launch Complex 39A, Kennedy Space Center, Florida Mission 14 Community Engagement: Number of communities engaged: 32 Number of students engaged in microgravity experiment design: 16,600 (grades 5-16) Number of flight experiment proposals submitted by student teams: 3,076 Number of finalist proposals submitted to Step 2 Review at NASA Goddard Spaceflight Center’s Visitor Center: 97 Number of experiments selected for flight (one for 31 communities and two for 1 community): 33 Flight Experiment Student Researchers: 129 (82 PIs & Co-PIs; 22 Co-Is; 25 Collaborators) The Student Spaceflight Experiments Program [or SSEP] is a program of the National Center for Earth and Space Science Education (NCESSE) in the U.S. and the Arthur C. Clarke Institute for Space Education internationally. It is enabled through a strategic partnership with DreamUp PBC and NanoRacks LLC, which are working with NASA under a Space Act Agreement as part of the utilization of the International Space Station as a National Laboratory. SSEP is the first pre- college STEM education program that is both a U.S. national initiative and implemented as an on-orbit commercial space venture. The Smithsonian National Air and Space Museum, the Center for the Advancement of Science in Space (CASIS), and Subaru of America, Inc., are U.S. National Partners on the Student Spaceflight Experiments Program.
    [Show full text]
  • LPIB Issue 164 (April 2021)
    THE CHICXULUB IMPACT CRATER: Producing a Cradle of Life in the Midst of a Global Calamity Featured Story | From the Desk of Lori Glaze | Meeting Highlights | News from Space | Spotlight on Education In Memoriam | Milestones | New and Noteworthy | Calendar LUNAR AND PLANETARY INFORMATION BULLETIN April 2021 Issue 164 FEATURED STORY THE CHICXULUB IMPACT CRATER: Producing a Cradle of Life in the Midst of a Global Calamity DAVID A. KRING, LUNAR AND PLANETARY INSTITUTE Expedition 364 mission patch Introduction when the International Ocean Discov- an area that had been a stable sediment ery Program (IODP) and International catchment for over 100 million years? Strategically located scientific drilling Continental Scientific Drilling Program Clues began to emerge when the core can be used to tap the Earth for evi- (ICDP) initiated a new campaign with was analyzed. Logging revealed chem- dence of evolutionary upheavals that the call sign Expedition 364. Drilling ical and petrological variations on the transformed the planet. A good example from a marine platform a few meters granitic theme, plus felsite and dolerite is the Yucatán-6 borehole in Mexico above the sea surface, the new borehole intrusions, in a granitoid rock sequence that recovered rock samples from 1.2 reached a depth of 1335 meters be- that represented continental crust that and 1.3 kilometers beneath Earth’s neath the sea floor (mbsf). The borehole had been assembled through a series of surface. I used those samples 30 years penetrated seafloor sediments that bury tectonic events over more than a billion ago to show that a buried, geophysical- the crater, finally reaching impactites at years.
    [Show full text]
  • The Right Rocket for the Job: Small Launch Providers Target Small Satellites
    The Right Rocket for the Job: Small Launch Providers Target Small Satellites An STS Research Paper presented to the faculty of the School of Engineering and Applied Science University of Virginia by Gabriel Norris May 11, 2020 On my honor as a University student, I have neither given nor received unauthorized aid on this assignment as defined by the Honor Guidelines for Thesis-Related Assignments. Signed: _________________________________________________ Approved: _______________________________________ Date ________________________ Peter Norton, Department of Engineering and Society 2 The University of Virginia Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering has its first satellite, Libertas, now in orbit and plans to launch two more within the next three years. This sudden activity is representative of the vastly increased smallsat1 launch cadence by a variety of groups around the world. The trend is facilitated by the reduced cost and relative ease of assembly conferred by CubeSats, which collectively make up 70 percent of satellites launched today (Halt & Wieger, 2019). Startups, underdeveloped countries, and universities that, just ten years ago, would have been incapable of any kind of space mission are now launching several. From 2012 to 2019, 663 CubeSats were manufactured by private companies, nearly 300 by governments or militaries, and 371 by academic institutions. Yearly satellite launches have increased six-fold in this time (Halt & Wieger, 2019; fig. 1). This marked increase in customers underscores a sociotechnical problem in the rocketry industry: most rockets are fairly large and cater primarily to large satellites, leaving behind a large number of customers in the smallsat domain. Satellites broadly fall within four categories of use: remote sensing, communication, technology demonstration, and scientific investigation.
    [Show full text]
  • Small Launchers in a Pandemic World - 2021 Edition of the Annual Industry Survey
    SSC21- IV-07 Small Launchers in a Pandemic World - 2021 Edition of the Annual Industry Survey Carlos Niederstrasser Northrop Grumman Corporation 45101 Warp Drive, Dulles, VA 20166 USA; +1.703.406.5504 [email protected] ABSTRACT Even with the challenges posed by the world-wide COVID pandemic, small vehicle "Launch Fever" has not abated. In 2015 we first presented this survey at the AIAA/USU Conference on Small Satellites1, and we identified twenty small launch vehicles under development. By mid-2021 ten vehicles in this class were operational, 48 were identified under development, and a staggering 43 more were potential new entrants. Some are spurred by renewed government investment in space, such as what we see in the U.K. Others are new commercial entries from unexpected markets such as China. All are inspired by the success of SpaceX and the desire to capitalize on the perceived demand caused by the mega constellations. In this paper we present an overview of the small launch vehicles under development today. When available, we compare their capabilities, stated mission goals, cost and funding sources, and their publicized testing progress. We also review the growing number of entrants that have dropped out since we first started this report. Despite the COVID-19 pandemic, one system became operational in the past 12 months and two or three more systems hope to achieve their first successful launch in 2021. There is evidence that this could be the year when the small launch market finally becomes saturated; however, expectations continue to be high and many new entrants hope that there is room for more providers.
    [Show full text]