The United Kingdom Is Likely to Break up Into Its Constituent Parts. to What Extent Do You Agree?

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The United Kingdom Is Likely to Break up Into Its Constituent Parts. to What Extent Do You Agree? The United Kingdom is likely to break up into its constituent parts. To what extent do you agree? Throughout the years, the UK has undergone devolution. This has seen the constituent parts of the UK (Scotland, Wales, Northern Ireland and the various regions of England) granted autonomy, through legislatures, legal systems, councils, mayors etc. independent from Westminster. Devolution in the UK is highly unlikely to ever lead to federalism, as any sovereign body separate from Westminster would undermine the convention at the core of the UK constitution: parliamentary sovereignty. However, I would argue that, devolution legitimises a nation’s claim to independence as it grants them the necessary institutions to become independent. Therefore, the only likely way that the United Kingdom could split into its constituent parts is by said constituent parts becoming independent countries. For this to occur, the regions and countries of the UK would need to achieve economic, political and cultural independence from the union. Under the current British administration, I would argue that the independence of British nations and regions and thus the dissolution of the UK, is highly unlikely. However, developments under future administrations could lead to independence. 1. Economic independence To begin, the likelihood of UK regions achieving economic independence must be considered. Regions that are less economically conjoined to Westminster, will be in a greater position to become independent nations. Scotland, out of all regions, is perhaps the most likely to achieve economic independence. Although it remains heavily reliant on the union, with 60% of Scotland’s exports to the rest of the UK in 20181, Scotland has a far greater GVA (the sum of the value of goods and services in an area), which was last measured in 2016 at £134 billion, than Wales or Northern Ireland and is only subordinate to three UK regions (London, South East and East England), as they have significantly larger populations. However, Scotland’s subordinate position in the UK economy also emboldens its calls for economic independence. Although having a strong economy, Scotland is economically dwarfed by England (with a GVA (last measured in 2016) of £1.5 trillion) 2. Therefore, if Scotland was to secede from the UK it would be able to do so without major economic impacts on the rest of the UK. Scotland’s calls for economic independence are also legitimised by Brexit. The current British administration believes that the UK will be more prosperous as independent from the EU, despite 45% of all UK exports and 53% of all imports going to and coming from the EU 3. 1 https://www.gov.scot/publications/export-stats-scotland-2018/ 2https://www.ons.gov.uk/economy/grossvalueaddedgva/bulletins/regionalgrossvalueaddedbalanceduk/1998t o2016/pdf 3 https://commonslibrary.parliament.uk/research-briefings/cbp-7851/ By applying the same logic as the current British administration, Scotland should flourish as an economically independent nation. However, the same cannot be said for the other UK nations and regions. The economies of Wales and Northern Ireland are amongst the weakest of all regions, due to their populations of 3 million and 1.8 million respectively 4 5. Because of the historical links between Wales and England, their economies remain largely conjoined, with the ability to control some fiscal policies only being devolved to Wales in 2018. Northern Ireland is also largely dependent on Westminster. Due to the region’s troubled history, devolved political and economic powers have long been under Westminster’s control. With Northern Ireland’s Stormont only being reopened in January this year, they are in a weak position to embark on any projects for economic autonomy. The various regions and countries of England are also in no position to economically break away from the Union, as their economies remain too intertwined with one another. The only region of England with significant independent economic powers is London, with the Mayor of London setting tax and a budget, separate from Westminster. There is a reason for this: England’s economy is only as strong as its constituent parts, which are united by national industries such as agriculture and construction. For any region of England, to declare themselves economically independent would be unthinkable. It is therefore clear, that of all the areas of the United Kingdom, Scotland would be the most likely to economically secede from the United Kingdom. 2. Political and cultural independence Political and cultural independence go hand in hand. For politicians to succeed in negotiating their nation’s independence, they require the support of the people. Likewise, the people of a nation can relate to politicians better than they can to complex economics. Scotland, I would argue, should be considered the most likely to politically and culturally break away from the UK. Scotland has more levels of autonomy than any other region/country in the UK, with expanded policy areas, such as gas extraction and rail franchising, being introduced in 2016. Scotland’s parliament is well developed and utilises the proportional voting system of AMS. As the UK is only 1 of 3 European countries to utilise a non-proportional system (the other two being France and Belarus) 6 , this distances Scotland politically further from the rest of the UK and aligns them closer with the rest of Europe. I would also argue that such measures of devolution have not dampened calls for Scottish independence but have instead strengthened them. Each new devolved power can be seen by the Scottish people as a step closer to independence, rather than concessions granted in order to retain Scotland in the Union. This is exemplified by support for the very catalyst for Scottish independence: the SNP. In the 2019 general election, the SNP secured 4 https://gov.wales/mid-year-estimates-population-mid-2019 5 https://www.nisra.gov.uk/publications/2019-mid-year-population-estimates-northern-ireland 6 https://www.electoral-reform.org.uk/which-european-countries-use-proportional-representation/ an impressive electoral victory by claiming 48 out of 59 seats in the commons, clearly demonstrating the mass public support for the SNP and its belief in Scottish independence. The result of the 2019 general election also demonstrates how Scotland has already developed cultural independence. Votes for the SNP in 2019 were also votes to preserve the Gaelic language, to preserve Scotland’s cultural position in Europe and Scotland’s distinct LGBT+ culture. Whilst I appreciate that Scotland lacks certain political institutions, such as an entirely separate judiciary (with the UK’s supreme court acting as Scotland’s final court of appeal for civil cases), it is certainly in a strong position to become politically and, if it is not already, culturally independent. However, as with economic independence, Wales and Northern Ireland are in comparatively weak positions. Both nations lack significant governmental infrastructure necessary for an independent country. Wales lacks an independent judiciary, with the Welsh court system a part of the English one. Northern Ireland, on the other hand, lacks a fully functional legislature. The Northern Irish Stormont has only been functional since January 2020 after being restored following 3 years of deadlock. Stormont regularly relies on intervention from Westminster as its dual leadership (with 1 minister from the republican Sinn Féin and the other from the unionist DUP) often struggling to cooperate. Both Wales and Northern Ireland remain heavily politically intertwined with Westminster. Furthermore, cultural independence remains a more complex issue in these regions. With Welsh nationalism stifled long ago by the English crown, it is no surprise that the major British parties consistently outperform Plaid Cymru. The failure of Plaid Cymru to achieve mass support in wales has a knock-on effect of discouraging welsh nationalism, with a September 2019 YouGov poll demonstrating how only 24% would vote for an independent Wales 7. Northern Irish cultural independence is perhaps even more complex, with public opinion divided between republicanism, with the aim of reuniting Northern Ireland with the Republic, and unionism, with the goal of preserving Northern Ireland’s place in the UK. As demonstrated by the repeated suspensions of Stormont and the Troubles of the 80s and 90s, Northern Irish politicians and the public are unable to work towards the common goal of seceding from the UK. It is highly unlikely that Wales or Northern Ireland will, in the near future, break away politically and/or culturally. The same should be said for the regions of England, with the only significant devolved governmental powers being the London Assembly and the Mayor of London. The regions of the UK remain too closely intertwined by the familiar and traditional Westminster system. Furthermore, regionalist cultural movements remain at the fringe of British politics. Perhaps the region with one of the strongest cultural identities in the UK is Yorkshire. However, the dismal electoral success of the regionalist Yorkshire Party in the 2019 General Election, which saw no candidate garner more than 3.7% of the constituency vote 8, stands to show 7 https://d25d2506sfb94s.cloudfront.net/cumulus_uploads/document/4lav01m6zl/PlaidCymruResults_190910_ Independence_W.pdf 8 https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/politics/constituencies/E14000836 that there is little demand for greater autonomy in England’s regions. Therefore, England’s regions are far from achieving cultural or political independence. 3. Obstructions to and the likelihood of independence As evaluated above, Scotland is perhaps the only nation in any real position to break away from the UK. However, there exist barriers to Scotland’s independence which must be considered. Firstly, the attitudes of the current British administration. Boris Johnson’s conservative government has taken an unapologetically British approach to government. His 2019 election campaign focussed heavily on a Britain united against an overbearing EU.
Recommended publications
  • 2018 Party Registration Decisions-English Version
    2018 Party registration decisions Decisions by the Commission to approve or reject applied for party names, descriptions and emblems in date order You can find the current registration details of the applicants by clicking on their name An overview of the rules on registering a political party names, descriptions and emblems can be found here Type of Application Identity Date of The identity mark applied applies to Registration Further information/ Reason for Applicant name Mark decision for which part decision rejection applied of the UK? for 10.12.18 Both Unions Party Name Both Unions Party All of Great Approve Britain 10.12.18 Both Unions Party Description Scotland for Both Unions: All of Great Approve UK Europe Britain 10.12.18 Both Unions Party Description Together we are all All of Great Reject Does not meet the requirements of strongest Britain a description 10.12.18 Both Unions Party Emblem All of Great Reject Confusingly similar to another Britain already registered party 10.12.18 Both Unions Party Name Both Unions Party of Northern Approve Northern Ireland Ireland 10.12.18 Ein Gwlad Name Ein Gwlad Wales Reject Application incomplete 10.12.18 Future Shepton Description Future Shepton – Working England Approve together for Shepton 10.12.18 Future Shepton Description A fresh approach with Future England Approve Shepton 1 Decisions on party registration applications made in 2018 Type of Application Identity Date of The identity mark applied applies to Registration Further information/ Reason for Applicant name Mark decision for which
    [Show full text]
  • By-Election Results: Revised November 2003 1987-92
    Factsheet M12 House of Commons Information Office Members Series By-election results: Revised November 2003 1987-92 Contents There were 24 by-elections in the 1987 Summary 2 Parliament. Of these by-elections, eight resulted Notes 3 Tables 3 in a change in winning party compared with the Constituency results 9 1987 General Election. The Conservatives lost Contact information 20 seven seats of which four went to the Liberal Feedback form 21 Democrats and three to Labour. Twenty of the by- elections were caused by the death of the sitting Member of Parliament, while three were due to resignations. This Factsheet is available on the internet through: http://www.parliament.uk/factsheets November 2003 FS No.M12 Ed 3.1 ISSN 0144-4689 © Parliamentary Copyright (House of Commons) 2003 May be reproduced for purposes of private study or research without permission. Reproduction for sale or other commercial purposes not permitted. 2 By-election results: 1987-92 House of Commons Information Office Factsheet M12 Summary There were 24 by-elections in the 1987 Parliament. This introduction gives some of the key facts about the results. The tables on pages 4 to 9 summarise the results and pages 10 to 17 give results for each constituency. Eight seats changed hands in the 1987 Parliament at by-elections. The Conservatives lost four seats to Labour and three to the Liberal Democrats. Labour lost Glasgow, Govan to the SNP. The merger of the Liberal Party and Social Democratic Party took place in March 1988 with the party named the Social and Liberal Democrats. This was changed to Liberal Democrats in 1989.
    [Show full text]
  • Information on Cases
    Casework and Investigations Decision on offence or Decision on Name and type of regulated Potential offence or contravention contravention sanction (imposed Brief summary of reason for Outcome or current Status last Further information entity investigated (by regulated on regulated entity decision status updated entity or or officer) officer) Published on 21 May 2019 The Commission considered, in Liberal Democrats (Kensington Late delivery of 2017 statement of £200 (fixed monetary accordance with the enforcement policy, Paid on initial notice on Offence 21 May 2019 and Chelsea accounting unit) accounts penalty) that sanctions were appropriate in this 25 April 2019 case. The Commission considered, in Liberal Democrats (Camborne, Late delivery of 2017 statement of £200 (fixed monetary accordance with the enforcement policy, Paid on initial notice on Redruth and Hayle accounting Offence 21 May 2019 accounts penalty) that sanctions were appropriate in this 25 April 2019 unit) case. The Commission considered, in Scottish Democratic Alliance Late delivery of 2017 statement of £200 (fixed monetary accordance with the enforcement policy, Due for payment by 12 Offence 21 May 2019 (registered political party) accounts penalty) that sanctions were appropriate in this June 2019 case. Published on 16 April 2019 The Commission considered, in British Resistance (registered Late delivery of 2017 statement of £300 (variable accordance with the enforcement policy, Offence Paid on 23 April 2019 21 May 2019 political party) accounts monetary penalty) that sanctions were appropriate in this case. The Commission considered, in Due for payment by 3 The Entertainment Party Late delivery of 2017 statement of £200 (fixed monetary accordance with the enforcement policy, May 2019.
    [Show full text]
  • CHARTIST for Democratic Socialism #309 March/April 2021 £2 Doctor Death
    CHARTIST For democratic socialism #309 March/April 2021 £2 Doctor Death Peter Kenyon STARMER CHALLENGE Gary Younge US ELECTIONS Alice Arkwright Bryn Jones Steven Walker COVID FALL-OUT Mary Southcott FEMINISM Mark Serwotka ELECTORAL REFORM Don Flynn RACISM Plus Book reviews and regulars ISSN - 0968 7866 ISSUE 09 www.chartist.org.uk Contributions and letters deadline for Editorial Policy CHARTIST #310 The editorial policy of CHARTIST is to promote debate amongst people active in 10 April 2021 radical politics about the contemporary Chartist welcomes articles of 800 or 1500 words, and relevance of democratic socialism across letters in electronic format only to: [email protected] the spectrum of politics, economics, science, philosophy, art, interpersonal Receive Chartist’s online newsletter: send your email address to [email protected] relations – in short, the whole realm of social life. Chartist Advert Rates: Our concern is with both democracy and socialism. The history of the last century Inside Full page £200; 1/2 page £125; 1/4 page £75; 1/8 page £40; 1/16 page £25; small box 5x2cm £15 single has made it abundantly clear that the sheet insert £50 mass of the population of the advanced We are also interested in advert swaps with other publications. To place an advert, please email: capitalist countries will have no interest [email protected] in any form of socialism which is not thoroughly democratic in its principles, its practices, its morality and its ideals. Yet the consequences of this deep attach - ment to democracy – one of the greatest advances of our epoch – are seldom reflected in the discussion and debates Editorial Board Contacts amongst active socialists.
    [Show full text]
  • In a West Yorkshire Constituency, 1920S – 1970S
    LIBERAL ROOTS: ThE LIBEral ParTY IN A WEST YORKShirE CONSTITUENCY, 1920S – 1970s From 1966 to 1971, as a teenager, Jaime Reynolds lived in Morley, West Yorkshire, now part of south Leeds. During that time he was an active member of the Liberals, who were enjoying something of a renaissance in the Batley & Morley constituency. In 1969 Batley borough council was briefly the only local authority in England and Wales where the Liberals were the largest party. Jaime’s desire was to chart the story of Liberal fortunes in these Yorkshire mill towns and pay tribute to the efforts of the pioneers who led the revival there. Thanks to the Liberal Democrat History Group, a few years ago he reestablished contact with Peter Wrigley. 26 Journal of Liberal History 80 Autumn 2013 LIBERAL ROOTS: ThE LIBEral ParTY IN A WEST YORKShirE CONSTITUENCY, 1920S – 1970s eter was one of those pio- in Morley in 1852. He moved away the prosperity and civic spirit it neers, parliamentary candi- as a child and though he was said to enjoyed at the end of the nine- Pdate in 1970 and February have few sentimental attachments teenth century. 1974 and still today an active Lib- to his birthplace, he returned in Morley and Batley, and neigh- eral Democrat in the Batley & Spen 1895 to open the town hall and in bouring Dewsbury, were at the constituency. Peter’s recollections, 1913 to be invested as a freeman of centre of the ‘shoddy trade’ – the local research, and the memories he the borough. He was treated as a recycling of woollen rags to make has gathered from others involved local hero.
    [Show full text]
  • Local Election Results 2021
    Local Election Results 2021 Andrew Teale September 3, 2021 2 ELECTION RESULTS 2021 Compilation and design © Andrew Teale, 2021. Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.3 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation; with no Invariant Sections, no Front-Cover Texts, and no Back-Cover Texts. A copy of the license is included in the section entitled “GNU Free Documentation License”. This le is available for download from http://www.andrewteale.me.uk/ Please advise the author of any corrections which need to be made by email: [email protected] Change Log Contents Referendums 5 Referendums in 2021 6 Newham mayoral abolition referendum . 6 Sheeld governance referendum . 6 Tower Hamlets mayoral abolition referendum . 6 Croydon mayoral referendum . 6 By-elections 7 Parliamentary by-elections 8 By-elections to devolved assemblies, the European Parliament, and police and crime commissioner- ships 10 Greater London Authority . 10 National Assembly for Wales . 10 Scottish Parliament . 10 Northern Ireland Assembly . 10 Police and crime commissioners . 10 Local by-elections and unlled vacancies 11 North London . 11 South London . 13 Greater Manchester . 14 Merseyside . 14 South Yorkshire . 15 Tyne and Wear . 15 West Midlands . 16 West Yorkshire . 16 Bedfordshire . 17 Berkshire . 17 Bristol . 17 Buckinghamshire . 17 Cambridgeshire . 17 Cheshire . 18 Cornwall . 18 Cumbria . 18 Derbyshire . 19 Devon.................................................. 20 Dorset . 21 Durham . 21 East Sussex . 21 East Yorkshire . 22 3 4 ELECTION RESULTS 2021 Essex................................................... 22 Gloucestershire . 23 Hampshire . 24 Herefordshire . 24 Hertfordshire . 24 Isle of Wight .
    [Show full text]
  • General Election 2019: Preview of Yorkshire and the Humber Page 1 of 6
    Democratic Audit: General election 2019: preview of Yorkshire and the Humber Page 1 of 6 General election 2019: preview of Yorkshire and the Humber In the run-up to the 2019 general election, the Democratic Audit team are previewing the key contests, and political divides in each of the country’s regions. On some forecasts Yorkshire and the Humber will see the most political upheaval, with the Conservatives campaigning hard to gain the advantage in areas long considered to be Labour strongholds. We focus on the key seats based on 2017’s marginal results, the latest polling, and how the Leave-Remain dynamic changes the established electoral contests. York. Picture: Emphyrio from Pixabay In 2017, the Conservatives failed to gain any ground in Yorkshire and the Humber in their campaign to take ‘Labour Leave’ seats, with the Labour Party instead benefiting at the expense of both the Conservatives and the Lib Dems. They took Colne Valley and Keighley from the Tories and Leeds North West and Sheffield Hallam from the Lib Dems, increasing the Labour seat count to 37. The Conservatives currently have 17 seats here, with particularly safe seats for them in rural North Yorkshire, and they also hold more marginal seats in West Yorkshire, including seats like Morley and Outwood, where they ousted former Labour Shadow Chancellor Ed Balls in 2015. The Lib Dems currently have no seats in the region. This time around, numerous constituencies in South and West Yorkshire along with Humberside form part of what has been dubbed ‘the red wall’ of Labour seats that voted Leave.
    [Show full text]
  • EUROPEAN POLITICAL PARTIES Contributions and Donations Related
    EUROPEAN POLITICAL PARTIES Contributions and donations related to financial year 2018 The information below is published pursuant to Article 32(1)(e) and (f) of Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 1141/2014 Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe Party Contributions from parties and political formations Contributor Country ALDE RO Alliance Party UK ANO 2011 CZ Centerpartiet SE Centerpartiet, Ȧland FI Ciudadanos ES Croatian People's Party - Liberal Democrats HR Darbo Partija LT Democraten 66 NL Demokratesch Partei LU Eesti Keskerakond EE Eesti Reformierakond EE FDP DE Fianna Fáil IE Glas HR Iniciativa Liberal PT HSLS HR 1 Contributor Country Istrian Democratic Assembly HR Keskusta FI Latvijas attistibai LV Liberal Democrats UK Liberal Party GI Liberalerna SE Liberalisok - Magyar Liberális Párt HU Liberals' Movement LT Mouvement Réformateur BE Movement for Rights and Freedoms BG NEOS AT Nowoczesna PL Open Vlaamse Liberalen en Democraten BE Pametno HR Partit Demokratiku MT PDeCAT ES Radicali Italiani IT Radikale Venstre DK SMC - Stranka Modernega Centra SI Svenska Folkpartiet FI Union of Democrats and Independents FR United Democrats CY Venstre Danmarks Liberale Parti DK Volkspartij voor Vrijheid en Democratie NL Zaveznistvo AB SI Total €417.294,64 Minor donations in accordance with Article 32(1)(e) Value Number of donors €12.682,00 486 2 Other donations Donor Country Value American Chamber of Commerce to the EU BE 6.000,00 Bayer AG DE 18.000,00 Deloitte to Deloitte Services & Investments NV BE 13.000,00 Eli Lilly Benelux SA BE 1.200,00 European
    [Show full text]
  • Cross Reference of Fleet Names to Operator Titles April 2014 Edition
    Cross Reference of Fleet Names to Operator Titles April 2014 Edition This listing provides a cross-reference of all fleet names to operator titles in the most recent round of G-Lists published by the PSV Circle. Each county or area is represented by the most recently issued G-List for that county. As at the date of publication, this list comprises references to G-Lists in both the 6 th (G5xx) and 7 th (G6xx) editions. This list is updated to G-Lists published in April 2014. Fleet Name Operator’s Title G-List 001 Minibuses Najeeb, Rotherham (SY) G671 001 Minibuses Tingey, Hemsworth (WY) G575-6 001 Taxibus Oxford Contract Vehicles, Oxford (OX) G633 01256 Minibuses Stoneman, Basingstoke (HA) G621 1 to 1 Community Transport Kelsey & Davies, North Benfleet (EX) G525-6 1-16 Minibuses Jackman, Newport Pagnell (BK) G653 1919 Minibuses Lee, Woodley (GM) G565-6 1919 Minibuses Normansell, Bredbury (GM) G565-6 1919 Minibuses Wallis, Woodley (GM) G565-6 1919 Minibuses Wilson, Romiley (GM) G565-6 1957 Executive Welch, Baguley (GM) G565-6 1st AAA Coaches Thurbin, Haverhill (SK) G556 1st American Limousines Clegg, Scunthorpe (LI) G553 1st AP Travel Coles, Totnes (DN) G631 1st Avenue Limousines Chambers, Billericay (EX) G525-6 1st Bus Stop Thurbin, Istead Rise (KT) G622-3 1st Call Limos Ramzan, Luton (BD) G651 1st Call Limos Ramzan, Luton (BD) G551 1st Call Minibuses Mason, Merthyr Tydfil (CS) G584 1st Call Minibuses Zahid, Nottingham (NG) G641 1st Call Fox, Birley Carr (SY) G671 1st Choice Limos Wright, Cottingham (EY) G572 1st Choice Limos Wright, Cottingham
    [Show full text]
  • Yougov / the Times Survey Results
    YouGov / The Times Survey Results Sample Size: 3864 GB Adults Fieldwork: 19th - 21st May 2019 Vote in 2017 EU Ref 2016 Gender Age Social Grade Region Lib Rest of Midlands / Total Con Lab Remain Leave Male Female 18-24 25-49 50-64 65+ ABC1 C2DE London North Scotland Dem South Wales Weighted Sample 3864 1275 1194 216 1488 1592 1870 1994 425 1627 920 893 2202 1662 464 1291 835 943 332 Unweighted Sample 3864 1356 1224 241 1692 1588 1693 2171 376 1566 930 992 2338 1526 407 1328 831 935 363 % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % HEADLINE VOTING INTENTION European Parliament Voting Intention [Weighted by likelihood to vote, excluding those who would not vote, don't know or refused] Con 7 16 1 3 8 7 6 8 8 7 7 8 8 7 7 8 8 6 7 Lab 13 1 31 1 18 6 12 13 17 18 10 6 11 15 20 8 15 15 7 Lib Dem 19 8 24 69 35 2 19 18 22 21 15 18 23 13 24 22 14 17 12 SNP 3 0 1 1 6 2 4 3 3 4 4 2 3 4 0 0 0 0 40 Plaid Cymru 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 4 0 0 Green 12 3 20 14 20 3 10 15 27 15 10 5 14 9 14 14 9 13 9 UKIP 3 3 1 2 1 5 3 3 1 3 3 2 2 4 3 2 3 4 2 Brexit Party 37 65 13 6 4 72 40 34 15 24 44 54 32 44 26 40 42 39 23 Change UK 4 3 5 3 6 2 4 4 2 5 3 2 4 3 4 4 4 4 1 Other 2 2 3 0 2 1 2 2 4 1 3 2 2 2 3 2 2 2 0 1 © 2019 YouGov plc.
    [Show full text]
  • Yougov / the Times Survey Results
    YouGov / The Times Survey Results Sample Size: 2212 GB Adults Fieldwork: 8th - 9th May 2019 Westminster VI Vote in 2017 EU Ref 2016 Gender Age Social Grade Region Lib Lib Rest of Midlands / Total Con Lab Con Lab Remain Leave Male Female 18-24 25-49 50-64 65+ ABC1 C2DE London North Scotland Dem Dem South Wales Weighted Sample 2212 363 366 251 730 684 124 852 911 1071 1141 243 931 526 511 1261 951 265 739 478 540 190 Unweighted Sample 2212 378 367 279 760 697 150 964 933 918 1294 191 854 573 594 1343 869 227 777 483 530 195 % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % 29-30 8-9 Apr May HEADLINE VOTING INTENTION Westminster Voting Intention [Weighted by likelihood to vote, excluding those who would not vote, don't know or refused] Con 29 24 100 0 0 55 2 4 17 34 25 23 9 22 23 33 25 22 18 31 26 19 14 Lab 29 24 0 100 0 1 56 3 33 12 21 27 33 30 19 17 21 27 34 18 23 32 15 Lib Dem 13 16 0 0 100 4 20 73 28 4 17 16 22 17 16 14 20 11 23 19 13 15 10 Other 29 36 0 0 0 40 22 20 21 51 36 35 35 31 42 35 33 39 25 32 38 33 61 Other Parties Westminster Voting Intention [Weighted by likelihood to vote, excluding those who would not vote, don't know or refused] SNP/ PCY 4 5 0 0 0 0 3 1 6 3 5 6 6 6 4 4 5 5 0 0 5 0 41 UKIP 2 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 3 1 2 1 3 2 1 1 3 2 1 2 3 1 Green 5 7 0 0 0 2 8 7 9 4 6 8 16 8 7 2 8 6 7 7 7 8 5 Brexit Party 15 18 0 0 0 33 7 3 1 38 21 15 9 11 24 26 16 22 11 21 19 20 12 Change UK 3 2 0 0 0 2 2 7 3 2 2 3 4 2 3 2 2 2 3 2 3 3 1 Other 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 0 1 European Parliament Voting Intention Con 13 10 48 0 0 21 0 2
    [Show full text]
  • 2018 04 14 Statutes with Ann
    Statuts – Alliance Libre Européenne ANNEX I – REGISTER OF MEMBERS I.I – Members There are 46 members: 36 Full members, 8 Observers, and 2 Associate members. I.II – List of Members ARTSAKH REPUBLIC Արցախի ժողովրդավարական կուսակցություն (Democratic Party of Artsakh) Legal status: Political Party President: Ashot Ghulyan. Registered office: G. Nzhdeh St 68, 375000 Stepanakert NKR, Armenia Website: www.dpa.am AUSTRIA Enotna Lista / Einheitsliste (EL) Legal status: Political Party President: Vladimir Smrtnik Registered office: Viktringer Ring 26, A-9020 Klagenfurt/Celovec – Kärnten - Austria Website: www.elnet.at BELGIUM Nieuw-Vlaamse Alliantie (N-VA) Legal status: ASBL Page 1 sur 15 Statuts – Alliance Libre Européenne President: Bart de Wever Registered office: Koningsstraat 47/6, 1000 Brussels – Flanders - Belgium Website: www.n-va.be BULGARIA Omo Ilinden Pirin Legal status: Political Party President: Stojko Stojkov Registered office: Blagoevgrad 2700, zk “Elenovo” bl 6 v. B ap. 6 p.k. Mechkarovi - Bulgaria Website: www.omoillindenpirin.org CROATIA Lista Per Fiume/Lista Za Rijeku Legal status: Political party President: Danko Svorinic Registered office: Žrtava fašizma 2 – Rijeka/Fiume - Croatia Website: www.listazarijeku.com CZECH REPUBLIC Moravians/ Moravané Legal status: Political party President: Ondrej Hysek Registered office: Malinovského námestí 4, 66087 Brno - Morava – Czech Republic Page 2 sur 15 Statuts – Alliance Libre Européenne Website: www.moravane.eu DENMARK Schleswigsche Partei (SP) Legal status: Political Party President:
    [Show full text]