DOCSLIB.ORG

Hon. Robert Mcclelland MP

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Hon. Robert Mcclelland MP Standing Committee on Electoral Matters ~~::::~ Secretary ROBERT MCCLELLAND MP M~MSER FOR BAItTON SI-~ADOWATTORNEY-GENERAL SHADOW MINISTER FOR WORJcI’LACEI RELATIONS The Secretary Joint Standing Committee on Electoral Matters Parliament House CANBERRA 2600 Dear Secretary RE~INOWRY INTO ThE CONDUCtOF THE 2001 FEDERALELECTION Thank you for your correspondence of d May 2002 inviting submissions in respect to the cohduct of2001 Federal election.23 I would like to make a brief submission In respectto an aspect ofthe conduct of the election In my electorate of Barton. Essentially the matter I would like to raise is referred to in the attached correspondence~ (a) To the District Returning Officer on election day th November 2001; (b) Follow up correspondence to the Australian Electoral10 Commissioner dated 14th February 2001. You will note 1 have not received a formal response to either of my letters. Essentially, and, In summary, the essence of my complaint to the Australian Electoral Commission was the fact that on election day, the Unity Party candidate in Barton distributed How to Vote material which was contrary to the How to Vote material that had been authorised and foreshadowed by the Unity Party itself1 As I point out in the attached correspondence there had been representation by the Unity Party in New South Wales that Unity Party candidates would distribute their second preference vote to the relevantAustralian Labor Party candidate in respective Federal electorates1 Indeed, the Unity Party prepared formal printed How to Vote brochures for distribution on election day which, In many instances were distributed and which, in accordance with the decision ofthe Unity Party itself, gave preferences to me as to the Australian Labor Party candidate in the Federal electorate of Barton. ELECTORATE 0FFIC~22 REGENT STREET, KOGARAH, N.S.W. 2217 • i~,O.~ox 27 KOGARAI.I, NS.W. 1485 TELEl~HoN~i(02) 9587 2344 • FACSIMILE: (02) 9587 8047 PARLtAMENT HOUSE CANe~RRAACT 2600 TELEPHONE: (02) 6277 4323 • FACSIMILE: (02) 6277 8442 EMAIL ADDRESSI r.mccleI1~ndmpc~iaph.gov.au TT/~d E~YOH LP882.856 ~ dN CNT1TDDN ~UO~ TS:t~T ~OO~flflf”P Page 2 The local candidate running under the title of “Unity Party” distributed different electoral material which, was a photocopy of the official Unity Party authorised How to Vote card with altered preference numbering. This, I believe, induced or, at the very least, had the potential to Induce people to record a vote that was not in accordance with theIr understanding and, accordingly, intention. As members of the Committee may well understand the distribution of the altered How to Vote brochures by persons representing the local Unity Party candidate (as opposed to the Unity Party), caused considerable distress which, In several booths, lead to disturbance indeed, In once instance I was called to attend a polling booth in Rockdale where it had been necessary to call the local police to resolve the difference of opinion. in that Instance after phoning the respective Head Office ofthe Unity Party and the campaign director ofthe local Unity Party candidate, the police officers reached the conclusion that the photocopied brochure should be withdrawn. During the course ofthe day the Australian Electoral Commission adopted several different positions in respect to the matterwhich, in Itself, further aggravated the anxiety of many campaign workers and, if anything, aggravated the situation1 This is the third election in which I have been a candidate for election in Barton and in my capacIty as a Member of the Australian Labor Party I have worked on virtually every Federal election campaign In Barton since I was 12 years old1 On each previous occasion the conduct of participants from all parties has been exemplary and volunteers from all parties have generally conducted themselves with appropriate courtesy and respect on polling booths1 I appreciate that there is a fine argument as to whether or not the alteration of the How to Vote material constituted an irregularity forthe purpose ofthe Electoral Act in the sense thatthat concept has been narrowly construed In relevant authorities. Nevertheless, the matter is one that requires rectification either by way of legislative amendment or administrative practice. A possible legislative amendment the Committee might consider whether It is necessary to expand the concept ofelectoral irregularityto Include a situation where a candidate issues voting instructions which are contrary to those issued by the party Which they represent or purport to represent1 ~:t’T ~O8~flflfP TI/Ed E~YON LPO82~8S6~8 dN CNUflT1J3N ~3~Oel Page 3 From the point of view of possible administrative action it might be thatthe Australian Electoral Commission should require candidates to lodge a copy of their How to Vote perhaps 48 hoUrs before polling day1 I trust these representations will be ofassistance to the inquiry however if any additional Information is required please do not hesitate to contact me. Yours sincerely ROBERT McCLELLAND MP Member for Barton Shadow Attorney General Shadow MinIster for Workplace Relations wwwjomc~//and.wm 2 July 20O2 E~:i7T ~1flft~ TT/P”d E~2ON LVO8L8SE ~ dW ~H TE3TON ~3SOèI ROBERT MCCLELLAND MP MEMBER FOR BARTON SHADOW ATTORNEV~GENFRAL 10 November” MrMichael Riches Divisional Returning Officer Level 2,21 King Street Rockdale 2216 Fax 9599 3589 Dear Mr Riches I referto our conversation at approximately midday today. I confirm that I drew your attention to a serious breach ofsection 329 ofthe Commonwealth ElectoralAct1918 by a candidate in the electorate ofBarton, Mr JobnLau. I understand that you have previouslybeenprovided with the following documents: (1) a copy ofthe official How To Vote card forUnity; (2) a copy oftheHow To Vote card beingdistributed on behalfofMrLan; (3) a copy ofa letter from Paul Mortimer, the Party Agent forUnity, to yourself as the Returning Officer forBarton. TheUnity Party haveproduced a how-to-vote (HTV) card for the seat ofBarton that gives preferences to theAustralian LaborParty candidate (RobertMcClelland) before the Liberal Party candidate (SanBrennan). Supporters oftheUnity Party are handingout those UTVcards at polling booths today, Saturday 10 November 2001. However, I confirm, earlieradvice which has beenprovided to you, that MrLau has causedto be distributed a How To Vote card which is identical to the official How To Vote card exceptin respect ofthepreferences. MrLan’s version preferences Ms Jan BrennanaboveMr MeClelland. I confirm that theHTV card distributed by MrLaupurports to be the official Unity HTVcard. It is not. Clearly the false card which has been distributed will have mislead and, if not urgently recalled, will continue to mislead electors in the casting ofa vote. Voters who wish to vote forthe Unity Party will be misled ifthey follow theNfl’ distributed by or on behalfofMr Lau. ELECTORATE QFrtca~22 REGENT STRaET, I’COGARAM, N.S.W. 2217 P.O. Box 27 KOc~ARAH,N,S.W. 1465 TELaPHONE; (02) 9587 2344 t FACSCMILE; (02) 9587 8047 PARLiAMENT HOUSE CANDERRA ACT 2600 TELEpHONE: (02) 6277 4323 a FACStMILE: (02) 6277 8442 EMAIL ADDRESS; r.mcc!efland. mp©aph.gov.au TT/Sd E&YON LPOBLBSB 20 dW CNUT1J1D3W m3ao~ ES:t’T aOOEflflf ~j7 I confirm my viewthat the breachof the electoralAct which has occun~edwas intentional in that I observed severalrepresentatives of Mr Lan at the Waltz Street Booth attempt to camouflage thefactthat theywere handingout Mr. Lau’s HTV by holdingthe officialblue Unity HTV on thetop oftheirHTVpile and drawing Mr. Lau’s photocopied HTV from thebottom ofthepile. I confirm that while I waspresent I did not observe those persons to hand out the officialUnity HTV and accordingly their conduct continued to be in Breach ofthe Act Requested action I confirmthe requested action, communicated to you by my campaign director, much earlier today, that theAEC instruct all persons handing out the false HTV card to cease doing so iniinediately. I understandthat action is ~owbeing taken, however I must express my regret at the delayed response by the Barton Divisional Office in respect to this seriousmatter. I conflnn that I reserve all rigbts that Imight have as a result ofthis unfortunate incident in what has otherwise been an extremely efficient and fair electoral process. Yours sincerely RobertMcClelland Memberfor Barton Shadow Attorney General CC Andy Becker Electoral Commissioner Australian Electoral Conirnissiori CANBERRA ACT 2600 By Fax: 02 6271 4522 t’S:i~T ~oo~flflf~ TT/9~d E~LOH LPO8LSS6 ~ dW Q~5113133~4~ I WhatUnitywantsfor ~ AustTalla - -. I ~ TM ~Iflity p~’tv be!Fe~E~(111 Ufl~1~P~ ~ i~MN~~W1~a~afi~ ~fu~ zn~i~iiWAbor~I~I~ ~ Foliow the Unity how to vote HOW TO VOTE card. Remember nLml,er every imn~ P1 TM IlmIlypeity ippo,~t~ef~.n~e~t~I - 1-~ fi~#rwvaJ~eofa IaVl ~e’. We Imis~ box on the green ba~otpaper. IGR~N1 5. ~ er~Hetf~T~ ~ £oiJ~iW~o ~tarthig with I for the Unity canth4ate. BqEWNA~j~r1 u,iitycai~Idaae 1r~i~i i~a~ysi~ ~ ITt LAIi,~thr~ —,~1 -u I ~ U_I Ui~lV -, ‘N ~6 i~ 1Yth,wi~~Ià,L - s lather at’d E~Z1 w ~onq xae re~dontin 0 ir~I~non*f~toc~. ~ ~ 0 •1~,~ I E~1 I e this couJ~by W15 ~JUt OD iW~uIti~r~~m. so T ..~q ~ ~nde~vourb p~wc!~-~n~MiW~f1~n .-(UNrJY)~ F~1 0 aao I~flnOf~r Lj~ ~4_1I.IIJ~I ~djiJ c4i~i*~ ~ -~ ___ ___ ____ ~ ~.—1 the fS~er~i~ vamflwflt ang ~ op i ~-~1 ~-b~ ~ ~ ~4~L’ ~ ~osE .read~irn~ - ~ ~~1~-;’~1~ 4-~ P5~-~~ ~ ,ecen’r ns~oFrzdH!l~I-~p~t~cu$art175 ~ ~rzlJon t OliIeiettWUL ~rx~it~et. I _____ Ic~ Ci) Bail ~ Atukf~e.~~45I2. ~ -~ I’m ~!and~rig ~c suoport am! pr~mcte P~It. ~ç ~ I!~VUfl ~.e5~fU1~.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Parties and Interest Associations Report Intra-Party Democracy, Association Competence (Business), Association Competence (Others)
    Sustainable Governance Indicators SGI 2015 Parties and Interest Associations Report Intra-party Democracy, Association Competence (Business), Association Competence (Others) SGI 2015 | 2 Parties and Interest Associations Indicator Intra-party Democracy Question How inclusive and open are the major parties in their internal decision-making processes? 41 OECD and EU countries are sorted according to their performance on a scale from 10 (best) to 1 (lowest). This scale is tied to four qualitative evaluation levels. 10-9 = The party allows all party members and supporters to participate in its decisions on the most important personnel and issues. Lists of candidates and agendas of issues are open. 8-6 = The party restricts decision-making to party members. In most cases, all party members have the opportunity to participate in decisions on the most important personnel and issues. Lists of candidates and agendas of issues are rather open. 5-3 = The party restricts decision-making to party members. In most cases, a number of elected delegates participate in decisions on the most important personnel and issues. Lists of candidates and agendas of issues are largely controlled by the party leadership. 2-1 = A number of party leaders participate in decisions on the most important personnel and issues. Lists of candidates and agendas of issues are fully controlled and drafted by the party leadership. Denmark Score 8 Four of the political parties represented in the Danish parliament, the Liberal Party, the Social Democratic Party, the Social Liberal Party and the Conservative Party have existed for more than 100 years and have all regularly taken part in governments.
    [Show full text]
  • Elections and Politics in Fiji
    i ii iii Co-Published by ANU E Press and Asia Pacific Press The Australian National Unversity Canberra ACT 0200 Email: [email protected] Website: http://epress.anu.edu.au National Library of Australia Cataloguing-in-Publication entry Lal, Brij V. Islands of turmoil : elections and politics in Fiji. Bibliography. Includes index. ISBN 0 7315 3751 3 ISBN 1 920942 75 0 (Online document) 1. Fiji - Politics and government. 2. Fiji - Social conditions. 3. Fiji - Economic conditions. I. Title. 996.11 This work is copyright. Apart from those uses which may be permitted under the Copyright Act 1968 as amended, no part may be reproduced by any process without written permission from the publishers. The views expressed in this book are those of the author and not necessarily of the publishers. Editor: Bridget Maidment Publisher: Asia Pacific Press and ANU E Press Design: Annie Di Nallo Design Printers: University Printing Service, The Australian National University Cover photo, Nukulau Prison, is copyright and used with permission (www.fijilive.com). Author photo by Darren Boyd, Coombs Photography. First edition © 2006 ANU E Press and Asia Pacific Press For the people of the Fiji Islands There is a dawn at the end of the darkest night v Contents Abbreviations vii Preface viii 1. The road to independence 1 2. Continuity and change 24 3. Things fall apart 49 4. Back from the abyss 77 5. Rabuka’s republic 100 6. Charting a new course 126 7. A time to change 155 8. George Speight’s coup 185 9. In George Speight’s shadow 206 10.
    [Show full text]
  • Second-Order Success, First-Order Gains and the European Electoral Cycle
    Prepared for the 26th ECPR Summer School on Political Parties. The University of Nottingham (UK), School of Politics and International Relations, 12 September - 23 September, 2016. This is a preliminary draft that will be revised. Comments welcome. A Springboard to the Domestic Arena? Second-Order Success, First-Order Gains and the European Electoral Cycle Julia Schulte-Cloos 21 August 2016 [Word Count: 9250] Abstract European Parliament (EP) elections offer a distinct incentive structure to voters as there is no government formation at stake. Triggering protest and non-strategical votes, small and radical parties enjoy structural advantages in the supranational contest. While these patterns are well established in the literature, it remains puz- zling how success in the second-order arena impinges on the parties’ first-order trajectories. We lack a systematic understanding of the implications that the sec- ondary elections themselves have on party competition within the domestic arena. This paper posits that EP elections serve as a springboard for success in the national arena. The institution of the EP elections along with the different voting calculi therein has unanticipated consequences for domestic party competition. Drawing on a novel database encompassing the electoral results of all EU member states in national and EP elections since 1979, the temporal distance between these elections, and their position within the respective electoral cycles, I show that particularly populist radical right parties benefit from a spillover of European success to the na- tional arena. This effect is especially pronounced if the temporal distance between the national and the European election is close. The results suggest that the insti- tution of EP elections not only provides these parties with a permeable forum for politicising Europe and their antagonism towards further integration, but that the European campaign also bestows salience upon their nationalistic policy demands.
    [Show full text]
  • Codebook: Government Composition, 1960-2019
    Codebook: Government Composition, 1960-2019 Codebook: SUPPLEMENT TO THE COMPARATIVE POLITICAL DATA SET – GOVERNMENT COMPOSITION 1960-2019 Klaus Armingeon, Sarah Engler and Lucas Leemann The Supplement to the Comparative Political Data Set provides detailed information on party composition, reshuffles, duration, reason for termination and on the type of government for 36 democratic OECD and/or EU-member countries. The data begins in 1959 for the 23 countries formerly included in the CPDS I, respectively, in 1966 for Malta, in 1976 for Cyprus, in 1990 for Bulgaria, Czech Republic, Hungary, Romania and Slovakia, in 1991 for Poland, in 1992 for Estonia and Lithuania, in 1993 for Latvia and Slovenia and in 2000 for Croatia. In order to obtain information on both the change of ideological composition and the following gap between the new an old cabinet, the supplement contains alternative data for the year 1959. The government variables in the main Comparative Political Data Set are based upon the data presented in this supplement. When using data from this data set, please quote both the data set and, where appropriate, the original source. Please quote this data set as: Klaus Armingeon, Sarah Engler and Lucas Leemann. 2021. Supplement to the Comparative Political Data Set – Government Composition 1960-2019. Zurich: Institute of Political Science, University of Zurich. These (former) assistants have made major contributions to the dataset, without which CPDS would not exist. In chronological and descending order: Angela Odermatt, Virginia Wenger, Fiona Wiedemeier, Christian Isler, Laura Knöpfel, Sarah Engler, David Weisstanner, Panajotis Potolidis, Marlène Gerber, Philipp Leimgruber, Michelle Beyeler, and Sarah Menegal.
    [Show full text]
  • Myanmar: Ethnic Politics and the 2020 General Election
    MYANMAR POLICY BRIEFING | 23 | September 2020 Myanmar: Ethnic Politics and the 2020 General Election KEY POINTS • The 2020 general election is scheduled to take place at a critical moment in Myanmar’s transition from half a century under military rule. The advent of the National League for Democracy to government office in March 2016 was greeted by all the country’s peoples as the opportunity to bring about real change. But since this time, the ethnic peace process has faltered, constitutional reform has not started, and conflict has escalated in several parts of the country, becoming emergencies of grave international concern. • Covid-19 represents a new – and serious – challenge to the conduct of free and fair elections. Postponements cannot be ruled out. But the spread of the pandemic is not expected to have a significant impact on the election outcome as long as it goes ahead within constitutionally-appointed times. The NLD is still widely predicted to win, albeit on reduced scale. Questions, however, will remain about the credibility of the polls during a time of unprecedented restrictions and health crisis. • There are three main reasons to expect NLD victory. Under the country’s complex political system, the mainstream party among the ethnic Bamar majority always win the polls. In the population at large, a victory for the NLD is regarded as the most likely way to prevent a return to military government. The Covid-19 crisis and campaign restrictions hand all the political advantages to the NLD and incumbent authorities. ideas into movement • To improve election performance, ethnic nationality parties are introducing a number of new measures, including “party mergers” and “no-compete” agreements.
    [Show full text]
  • Maintaining Party Unity: Analyzing the Conservative Party of Canada's
    Maintaining Party Unity: Analyzing the Conservative Party of Canada’s Integration of the Progressive Conservative and Canadian Alliance parties by Matthew Thompson A thesis submitted to the Faculty of Graduate and Postdoctoral Affairs in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Political Science Carleton University Ottawa, Ontario © 2017, Matthew Thompson Federal conservative parties in Canada have long been plagued by several persistent cleavages and internal conflict. This conflict has hindered the party electorally and contributed to a splintering of right-wing votes between competing right-wing parties in the 1990s. The Conservative Party of Canada (CPC) formed from a merger of the Progressive Conservative (PC) party and the Canadian Alliance in 2003. This analysis explores how the new party was able to maintain unity and prevent the long-standing cleavages from disrupting the party. The comparative literature on party factions is utilized to guide the analysis as the new party contained faction like elements. Policy issues and personnel/patronage distribution are stressed as significant considerations by the comparative literature as well literature on the PCs internal fighting. The analysis thus focuses on how the CPC approached these areas to understand how the party maintained unity. For policy, the campaign platforms, Question Period performance and government sponsored bills of the CPC are examined followed by an analysis of their first four policy conventions. With regards to personnel and patronage, Governor in Council and Senate appointments are analyzed, followed by the new party’s candidate nomination process and Stephen Harper’s appointments to cabinet. The findings reveal a careful and concentrated effort by party leadership, particularly Harper, at managing both areas to ensure that members from each of the predecessor parties were motivated to remain in the new party.
    [Show full text]
  • An Inquiry Into Contemporary Australian Extreme Right
    THE OTHER RADICALISM: AN INQUIRY INTO CONTEMPORARY AUSTRALIAN EXTREME RIGHT IDEOLOGY, POLITICS AND ORGANIZATION 1975-1995 JAMES SALEAM A Thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor Of Philosophy Department Of Government And Public Administration University of Sydney Australia December 1999 INTRODUCTION Nothing, except being understood by intelligent people, gives greater pleasure, than being misunderstood by blunderheads. Georges Sorel. _______________________ This Thesis was conceived under singular circumstances. The author was in custody, convicted of offences arising from a 1989 shotgun attack upon the home of Eddie Funde, Representative to Australia of the African National Congress. On October 6 1994, I appeared for Sentence on another charge in the District Court at Parramatta. I had been convicted of participation in an unsuccessful attempt to damage a vehicle belonging to a neo-nazi informer. My Thesis -proposal was tendered as evidence of my prospects for rehabilitation and I was cross-examined about that document. The Judge (whose Sentence was inconsequential) said: … Mr Saleam said in evidence that his doctorate [sic] of philosophy will engage his attention for the foreseeable future; that he has no intention of using these exertions to incite violence.1 I pondered how it was possible to use a Thesis to incite violence. This exercise in courtroom dialectics suggested that my thoughts, a product of my experiences in right-wing politics, were considered acts of subversion. I concluded that the Extreme Right was ‘The Other Radicalism’, understood by State agents as odorous as yesteryear’s Communist Party. My interest in Extreme Right politics derived from a quarter-century involvement therein, at different levels of participation.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter Five
    5 2WKHULVVXHV Funding and disclosure Funding entitlements 5.1 Part XX of the Commonwealth Electoral Act 1918 (Electoral Act) provides for public funding of election campaigns to be made available to candidates and political parties who receive at least four per cent of the formal first preference vote. This funding ensures candidates are not disadvantaged in their appeal to electors or unduly influenced in their subsequent actions by lack of access to adequate funding. 5.2 Mr and Mrs Whitton, Mr Arthur Tuck and Mr Goldstiver call for the elimination of public funding to political parties for election campaigns.1 G W Spence and Mr Lockett suggest a restriction be placed on the amount that can be spent on election campaigns to reduce the amount of public funding necessary.2 5.3 The public funding entitlements for the 1998 federal election, including the Newcastle supplementary election, totalled $33,920,787.43. The funding rate was 162.210 cents per vote3 and this has been paid to party agents and independent candidates as shown in Table 5.1. 1 Submissions pp S592 (H&M.Whitton), S667 (M.Goldstiver) and S1844 (A.Tuck) 2 Submissions pp S214 (GW.Spence) and S632-S633 (E.Lockett) 3 Australian Electoral Commission. 1999. Electoral Pocket Book, Canberra, AEC, p 57. 124 Table 5.1 1998 election funding payments Payee Amount - $ Australian Labor Party 13,959,511.97 Liberal Party of Australia 11,488,881.15 National Party of Australia 2,321,589.02 Northern Territory Country Liberal Party 116,916.10 Australian Democrats 2,247,677.46 Australian Greens
    [Show full text]
  • Coalition Politics in Southern Africa Cover.Indd
    AFRICA DIALOGUE Monograph Series No. 1/2018 COMPLEXITIES OF COALITION POLITICS IN SOUTHERN AFRICA The rise and fall of Lesotho’s coalition governments The Intricacies and Pitfalls of the Politics of Coalition in Mozambique The Politics of Dominance and Survival: Coalition Politics in South Africa 1994–2018 Complexities of Coalition Politics in Southern Africa Monograph Series No. 1/2018 Edited By: Senzo Ngubane ACCORD The Africa Dialogue Monograph Series is published by the African Centre for the Constructive Resolution of Disputes (ACCORD). ACCORD is a civil society institution working throughout Africa to bring creative African solutions to the challenges posted by conflict on the continent. ACCORD’s primary aim is to influence political developments by bringing conflict resolution, dialogue and institutional development to the forefront as an alternative to armed violence and protracted conflict. Disclaimer Views expressed in this publication are not necessarily those of ACCORD. While every attempt has been made to ensure that the information published here is accurate, no responsibility is accepted for any loss or damage that may arise out of the reliance of any person upon any of the information this series contains. Copyright © 2018 ACCORD ISSN 1562–7004 This publication may be downloaded at no charge from the ACCORD website: <http://www.accord.org.za>. All rights reserved. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study, research, criticism or review, as permitted under the Copyright Act, no part may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior permission of the publisher.
    [Show full text]
  • Profiles of Minor Parties and Their Positions Within the Australian Political Landscapes of ‘Racism’, 1999 and 2003 New South Wales State Elections 1
    Stephen Smith, UNSW, New South Wales ([email protected]) Chasing the ‘race’ and ‘ethnic’ votes: Profiles of minor parties and their positions within the Australian political landscapes of ‘racism’, 1999 and 2003 New South Wales State Elections 1 Introduction The candidate standings, political agenda and voter support base of a political party provide indications of the geography of their voter support, and where the messages from their political agenda resonate strongest among the body politic. My research focuses on the candidate standings and the voter support bases of Australians Against Further Immigration (AAFI), One Nation (ONP) and Unity (UNI) in Greater Sydney at the 1999 and 2003 NSW State elections. The Greater Sydney region consists of fifty-six of the NSW Legislative Assembly’s ninety-three electorates. These electorates are located in the Central Coast, Sydney Metropolitan and Blue Mountains regions. The total numbers of registered voters in these electorates totalled over 2.5 million people. I have also examined the ‘political agendas’ on immigration and multiculturalism presented by the three parties, made comparisons with international parties, and looked at how the conditionality of the political landscape impact upon the activities and success of minor parties. Literature on Australian minor parties can best be described as fairly limited. Discussion of AAFI (see Economou, 1999 and Newman, 1995) and UNI (see Healy, 1999 and 2001 and Money, 1999) has been especially scarce. There has been more prominent coverage given to the ONP (for example see Goot, 1998; Goot and Watson, 2001; Johnson, 1998 and 2000 and Maddox, 2000). There has been greater coverage given to minor parties in the international context, especially on far right-wing minor parties in Western Europe.
    [Show full text]
  • Opposition Parties and Elite Co-Optation in Electoral Autocracies
    INSTITUTE Opposition Parties and Elite Co-optation in Electoral Autocracies Berker Kavasoglu May 2021 Working Paper SERIES 2021:120 THE VARIETIES OF DEMOCRACY INSTITUTE Varieties of Democracy (V-Dem) is a new approach to conceptualization and measurement of democracy. The headquarters – the V-Dem Institute – is based at the University of Gothenburg with 23 staff. The project includes a worldwide team with 5 Principal Investigators, 19 Project Managers, 33 Regional Managers, 134 Country Coordinators, Research Assistants, and 3,500 Country Experts. The V-Dem project is one of the largest ever social science research-oriented data collection programs. Please address comments and/or queries for information to: V-Dem Institute Department of Political Science University of Gothenburg Sprängkullsgatan 19, Box 711 405 30 Gothenburg Sweden E-mail: [email protected] V-Dem Working Papers are available in electronic format at www.v-dem.net. Copyright ©2021 by authors. All rights reserved. Opposition Parties and Elite Co-optation in Electoral Autocracies Berker Kavasoglu∗ Abstract Autocratic incumbents often attempt to co-opt select opposition party leaders to minimize threats to their rule. While the literature identifies co-optation of opposition party leaders as an important survival strategy of autocrats in electoral autocracies, we lack a systematic examination of why some opposition party leaders are co-opted but not others. This article argues that opposition party co-optation is shaped by both inter- and intra-party dynamics. Using a novel data set on opposition party organizations in electoral autocracies between 1970 and 2019, I show that opposition parties with high mobilizational capacity and those that devolve internal decision-making authority from the party leadership to lower cadres are less likely to be co-opted, especially when they are ideological distant from autocratic incumbents.
    [Show full text]
  • [324 *‡The Political Process Class Here Elections See Manual at 324 Vs
    324 Political[science[(Politics[and[government) 324 324 Political[sci324en Deweyce[(PoliticiDecimas[andliClassification[government) 324 [324 *‡The political process Class here elections See Manual at 324 vs. 320; also at 324 vs. 320.5, 320.9, 909, 930–990; also at 909, 930–990 vs. 320 324 Political[sci324en Deweyce[(PoliticiDecimas[andliClassification[government) 324 SUMMARY [324.09 History, geographic treatment, biography [.1 International party organizations, auxiliaries, activities [.2 Political parties [.3 Auxiliary party organizations [.4 Interest and pressure groups [.5 Nominating candidates [.6 Election systems and procedures; suffrage [.7 Conduct of election campaigns [.9 History and geographic treatment of elections 324 Political[sci324en Deweyce[(PoliticiDecimas[andliClassification[government) 324 [.09 *‡History, geographic treatment, biography Do not use for historical and geographic treatment of elections; class in 324.9 324 Political[sci324en Deweyce[(PoliticiDecimas[andliClassification[government) 324 [.1 *‡International party organizations, auxiliaries, activities Not directly controlled by specific national parties Class revolutionary and subversive activities and branches of party organizations in 322.42 324 Political[sci324en Deweyce[(PoliticiDecimas[andliClassification[government) 324 > [324.13–324.17*‡International organizations, auxiliaries, activities of parties identified primarily by position on right-to-left spectrum Class organizations, auxiliaries, activities of parties not identified primarily by position on
    [Show full text]