Profiles of Minor Parties and Their Positions Within the Australian Political Landscapes of ‘Racism’, 1999 and 2003 New South Wales State Elections 1

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Profiles of Minor Parties and Their Positions Within the Australian Political Landscapes of ‘Racism’, 1999 and 2003 New South Wales State Elections 1 Stephen Smith, UNSW, New South Wales ([email protected]) Chasing the ‘race’ and ‘ethnic’ votes: Profiles of minor parties and their positions within the Australian political landscapes of ‘racism’, 1999 and 2003 New South Wales State Elections 1 Introduction The candidate standings, political agenda and voter support base of a political party provide indications of the geography of their voter support, and where the messages from their political agenda resonate strongest among the body politic. My research focuses on the candidate standings and the voter support bases of Australians Against Further Immigration (AAFI), One Nation (ONP) and Unity (UNI) in Greater Sydney at the 1999 and 2003 NSW State elections. The Greater Sydney region consists of fifty-six of the NSW Legislative Assembly’s ninety-three electorates. These electorates are located in the Central Coast, Sydney Metropolitan and Blue Mountains regions. The total numbers of registered voters in these electorates totalled over 2.5 million people. I have also examined the ‘political agendas’ on immigration and multiculturalism presented by the three parties, made comparisons with international parties, and looked at how the conditionality of the political landscape impact upon the activities and success of minor parties. Literature on Australian minor parties can best be described as fairly limited. Discussion of AAFI (see Economou, 1999 and Newman, 1995) and UNI (see Healy, 1999 and 2001 and Money, 1999) has been especially scarce. There has been more prominent coverage given to the ONP (for example see Goot, 1998; Goot and Watson, 2001; Johnson, 1998 and 2000 and Maddox, 2000). There has been greater coverage given to minor parties in the international context, especially on far right-wing minor parties in Western Europe. Examples of these political parties include the British National Party (BNP) and National Front (NF) in Britain (see Eatwell, 1998 and Kushner, 1994), Front National (FN) in France (see Ivaldi, 1996 and Mayer, 1998), Republikaner (REP) in Germany (see Bergmann, 1994 and Winkler and Schumann, 1998) and Freiheitliche Partei Österreichs (FPÖ) in Austria (see Mudde, 1999 and Pedahzur and Brichta, 2002). There is also general theoretical discussion of supporter bases of minor political parties and reasons for their emergence from within the body politic (see Betz, 1998; Immerfall, 1998; Kitschelt, 1995 and Saggar, 2000) and the challenges these parties face in remaining viable participants in various electoral systems (see Gerring, 2005). This literature has enabled a comparative context and greater depth for discussion of Australian minor parties. Method There were two methods that were used in this research. First, an analysis of candidate standings was undertaken to examine the perceptions of the geography of voter support bases for each party. A comparison of the number of candidates that AAFI, the ONP and UNI fielded at the 1999 and 2003 NSW State elections in Greater Sydney electorates are outlined in Figure 1. Second, voter support bases were analysed using socio-economic and demographic variables from the 2001 Census compiled by D’Arney (2003). These variables included non-Anglo population presence, age, educational qualifications and economic disadvantage indicators such as unemployment rate and presence of low-income earning families. Analysis conducted using these variables enabled identification of the key Smith – Chasing the ‘Race’ and ‘Ethnic’ Votes 2 characteristics of the voter support bases for each of AAFI, the ONP and UNI in Greater Sydney. Political party profiles Australians Against Further Immigration (AAFI) was formed in 1989 with an ethos of advocating an end to net immigration as a source of population growth (Newman, 1995:46- 47). AAFI has suggested that Australia should reduce its immigration intake to 20,000- 30,000 persons per year (zero-net). This argument is reflected in the party expressions of concern about illegal immigrants and desire to present this issue on the political agenda: Illegal immigrants, their tactics to force their way here, their loyalty to Australia in the light of war on terrorism, ethnic based assaults in south-west Sydney and drug dealing in Cabramatta are all of a sudden presented to the voter as he [sic] casts his [sic] vote. (AAFI cited in NSW SEO, 2003a:1) Furthermore, the party has argued that ‘[t]he people have never been consulted on, or given their consent to, the interwoven policies of immigration and multiculturalism’ (AAFI cited in NSW SEO, 2003a:1). AAFI have accused both major parties of attempting to avoid discussion of immigration and multiculturalism issues ‘for fear of alienating any ethnic group which they so often cringe to secure extra votes at an election’ (AAFI cited in NSW SEO, 2003a:1). Clearly, AAFI are a political party that has used an anti-immigration and anti-multiculturalism platform to appeal to voters for support, and to critique the stance of the major political parties on these issues. The One Nation Party (ONP) is another example of a political party that has presented an anti-immigration and anti-multiculturalism platform to voters. Initially formed in 1997 by Pauline Hanson2, Johnson (2000:44-45) indicated that the party has drawn upon electoral resentments and articulating the fears and concerns felt by many Australians to develop its political platform. The ONP has argued that ‘[t]he cultural, ethnic and racial makeup of Australia must not be radically altered through immigration without the express consent of the Australian people through referenda’ (ONP cited in NSW SEO, 2003b:1). This statement was directed at voters who support the pro-assimilationist stance of the party and feel alienated by government policies on immigration-related issues. The ONP has also argued that government activities should focus on the assimilation of immigrants, multiculturalism should be abolished along with associated funding, and that individuals and groups wanting to maintain their cultural heritage should do so using their own resources. The equation that best describes the policy approach adopted by the ONP to attract voter support is that high immigration levels plus multicultural policies have equalled the collapse of social cohesion in Australia. This equation reflects a key grievance that is felt by a section of predominantly Anglo-Celtic voters whom the ONP has targeted to attract electoral support (Johnson, 1998:216). The Unity Party (UNI) has been included in this research as an example of a minor party that is both politically and ideologically different from both AAFI and the ONP. UNI was formed in 1998 to mobilise voter support for multiculturalism. Healy (1999:51 and 54) and Money (1999:14) indicated that the party has developed a unique pro-immigration and pro- multiculturalism agenda to appeal within the body politic. This has been reflected in UNI’s description of Australia as a ‘modern multicultural society, diverse and essentially Smith – Chasing the ‘Race’ and ‘Ethnic’ Votes 3 harmonious’ (UNI cited in NSW SEO, 2003c:1). UNI has called for Australian society to be a society ‘where the rights of all our communities are valued’ (UNI cited in NSW SEO, 2003c:1). UNI has also called upon Australians ‘to work towards creating a society that is harmonious, culturally rich and cohesive in its diversity’ (UNI cited in NSW SEO, 2003c:1). This viewpoint has been reflected in UNI’s immigration policy through calling for a fair and balanced immigration program that enriches Australian society, culture and economy (UNI, 2002). UNI has supported and promoted a platform that embraces immigration and multiculturalism as beneficial to Australian society and rejects racism through aiming to improve community relations. Candidate Standings Australians Against Further Immigration (AAFI) AAFI’s candidate standings remained relatively constant between the two elections in terms of its geographical spread. AAFI did not contest inner city and some middle-ring suburban electorates. However, the party fielded more candidates at the 1999 election than the 2003 election in Greater Sydney. At the 1999 election, AAFI fielded fifty-two candidates whilst at the 2003 election, AAFI fielded thirty-four candidates in Greater Sydney - a decrease of eighteen (refer Figure 1). Economou (1999:245) suggested that AAFI candidacy has often been sporadic at general elections. The 1999 and 2003 NSW State elections are two examples of general elections that would affirm Economou’s description. AAFI has increasingly focussed its efforts on building a ‘core’ electoral support base located in outer suburban electorates. These electorates are the section of the body politic where voters are most likely to support the party’s pro-assimilationist position. However, the ability of AAFI to sustain a widespread geographical presence of candidates has been hampered through sporadic candidate numbers and limited available resources for election campaigning. This has consequently impacted on the ability of the party to attract voter attention during an election campaign. One Nation (ONP) Similar to AAFI, the ONP had more candidates contest the 1999 election than at the 2003 election. At the 1999 election, the ONP fielded fifty-five candidates, and the party had the largest geographical presence of candidates in Greater Sydney. At the 2003 election, the ONP fielded only twenty-five candidates - a decrease of thirty (refer Figure 1). The geographical spread of candidates contracted significantly with the
Recommended publications
  • House of Representatives By-Elections 1901–2008
    Parliament of Australia Department of Parliamentary Services Parliamentary Library Information, analysis and advice for the Parliament RESEARCH PAPER www.aph.gov.au/library 22 September 2008, no. 7, 2008–09, ISSN 1834-9854 House of Representatives by-elections 1901–2008 Scott Bennett Politics and Public Administration Section Gerard Newman Formerly Statistics and Mapping Section Executive summary This paper details of House of Representatives by-elections held from that for Darling Downs on 14 September 1901 to the most recent held on 6 September 2008 for Lyne and Mayo: • There have been 144 by-elections, an average of 3.5 per parliament. • The number of nominations has grown over the years from 2.2 per by-election to 10.4 per by-election. • In only four cases was a by-election contested by just a single candidate. • An increasing tendency has been for governments to avoid contesting by-elections in their opponents’ safe seats. • In only seven cases has the Opposition party failed to contest a by-election. • Sixty-seven of the by-elections followed the death of the member, 71 members resigned, there have been five voided elections, and one MP was expelled from the House. • Since 1949 most by-elections have been caused by the resignation of the sitting member and have occurred in safe seats. • On 35 occasions the party complexion of a seat has altered at a by-election. • Five of the losses have been by the Opposition of the day. • The average two-party preferred swing against the government of the day has been 4.0 per cent.
    [Show full text]
  • Submission to the Joint Standing Committee on Electoral Matters Inquiry Into the Conduct of the 2013 Federal Election
    11 April 2014 Joint Standing Committee on Electoral Matters Parliament House Canberra ACT Please find attached my submission to the Committee's inquiry into the conduct of the 2013 federal election. In my submission I make suggestions for changes to political party registration under the Commonwealth Electoral Act. I also suggest major changes to Senate's electoral system given the evident problems at lasty year's election as well as this year's re-run of the Western Australian Senate election. I also make modest suggestions for changes to formality rules for House of Representatives elections. I have attached a substantial appendix outlining past research on NSW Legislative Council Elections. This includes ballot paper surveys from 1999 and research on exhaustion rates under the new above the line optional preferential voting system used since 2003. I can provide the committee with further research on the NSW Legislative Council system, as well as some ballot paper research I have been carrying out on the 2013 Senate election. I am happy to discuss my submission with the Committee at a hearing. Yours, Antony Green Election Analyst Submission to the Joint Standing Committee on Electoral Matters Inquiry into the Conduct of the 2013 Federal Election Antony Green Contents Page 1. Political Party Registration 1 2. Changes to the Senate's Electoral System 7 2.1 Allow Optional Preferential Voting below the line 8 2.2 Above the Line Optional Preferential Voting 9 2.3 Hare Clark 10 2.4 Hybrid Group Ticket Option 10 2.5 Full Preferential Voting Above the Line 11 2.6 Threshold Quotas 11 2.7 Optional Preferential Voting with a Re-calculating Quota 12 2.8 Changes to Formula 12 2.9 My Suggested Solution 13 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Parties and Interest Associations Report Intra-Party Democracy, Association Competence (Business), Association Competence (Others)
    Sustainable Governance Indicators SGI 2015 Parties and Interest Associations Report Intra-party Democracy, Association Competence (Business), Association Competence (Others) SGI 2015 | 2 Parties and Interest Associations Indicator Intra-party Democracy Question How inclusive and open are the major parties in their internal decision-making processes? 41 OECD and EU countries are sorted according to their performance on a scale from 10 (best) to 1 (lowest). This scale is tied to four qualitative evaluation levels. 10-9 = The party allows all party members and supporters to participate in its decisions on the most important personnel and issues. Lists of candidates and agendas of issues are open. 8-6 = The party restricts decision-making to party members. In most cases, all party members have the opportunity to participate in decisions on the most important personnel and issues. Lists of candidates and agendas of issues are rather open. 5-3 = The party restricts decision-making to party members. In most cases, a number of elected delegates participate in decisions on the most important personnel and issues. Lists of candidates and agendas of issues are largely controlled by the party leadership. 2-1 = A number of party leaders participate in decisions on the most important personnel and issues. Lists of candidates and agendas of issues are fully controlled and drafted by the party leadership. Denmark Score 8 Four of the political parties represented in the Danish parliament, the Liberal Party, the Social Democratic Party, the Social Liberal Party and the Conservative Party have existed for more than 100 years and have all regularly taken part in governments.
    [Show full text]
  • Elections and Politics in Fiji
    i ii iii Co-Published by ANU E Press and Asia Pacific Press The Australian National Unversity Canberra ACT 0200 Email: [email protected] Website: http://epress.anu.edu.au National Library of Australia Cataloguing-in-Publication entry Lal, Brij V. Islands of turmoil : elections and politics in Fiji. Bibliography. Includes index. ISBN 0 7315 3751 3 ISBN 1 920942 75 0 (Online document) 1. Fiji - Politics and government. 2. Fiji - Social conditions. 3. Fiji - Economic conditions. I. Title. 996.11 This work is copyright. Apart from those uses which may be permitted under the Copyright Act 1968 as amended, no part may be reproduced by any process without written permission from the publishers. The views expressed in this book are those of the author and not necessarily of the publishers. Editor: Bridget Maidment Publisher: Asia Pacific Press and ANU E Press Design: Annie Di Nallo Design Printers: University Printing Service, The Australian National University Cover photo, Nukulau Prison, is copyright and used with permission (www.fijilive.com). Author photo by Darren Boyd, Coombs Photography. First edition © 2006 ANU E Press and Asia Pacific Press For the people of the Fiji Islands There is a dawn at the end of the darkest night v Contents Abbreviations vii Preface viii 1. The road to independence 1 2. Continuity and change 24 3. Things fall apart 49 4. Back from the abyss 77 5. Rabuka’s republic 100 6. Charting a new course 126 7. A time to change 155 8. George Speight’s coup 185 9. In George Speight’s shadow 206 10.
    [Show full text]
  • Second-Order Success, First-Order Gains and the European Electoral Cycle
    Prepared for the 26th ECPR Summer School on Political Parties. The University of Nottingham (UK), School of Politics and International Relations, 12 September - 23 September, 2016. This is a preliminary draft that will be revised. Comments welcome. A Springboard to the Domestic Arena? Second-Order Success, First-Order Gains and the European Electoral Cycle Julia Schulte-Cloos 21 August 2016 [Word Count: 9250] Abstract European Parliament (EP) elections offer a distinct incentive structure to voters as there is no government formation at stake. Triggering protest and non-strategical votes, small and radical parties enjoy structural advantages in the supranational contest. While these patterns are well established in the literature, it remains puz- zling how success in the second-order arena impinges on the parties’ first-order trajectories. We lack a systematic understanding of the implications that the sec- ondary elections themselves have on party competition within the domestic arena. This paper posits that EP elections serve as a springboard for success in the national arena. The institution of the EP elections along with the different voting calculi therein has unanticipated consequences for domestic party competition. Drawing on a novel database encompassing the electoral results of all EU member states in national and EP elections since 1979, the temporal distance between these elections, and their position within the respective electoral cycles, I show that particularly populist radical right parties benefit from a spillover of European success to the na- tional arena. This effect is especially pronounced if the temporal distance between the national and the European election is close. The results suggest that the insti- tution of EP elections not only provides these parties with a permeable forum for politicising Europe and their antagonism towards further integration, but that the European campaign also bestows salience upon their nationalistic policy demands.
    [Show full text]
  • Codebook: Government Composition, 1960-2019
    Codebook: Government Composition, 1960-2019 Codebook: SUPPLEMENT TO THE COMPARATIVE POLITICAL DATA SET – GOVERNMENT COMPOSITION 1960-2019 Klaus Armingeon, Sarah Engler and Lucas Leemann The Supplement to the Comparative Political Data Set provides detailed information on party composition, reshuffles, duration, reason for termination and on the type of government for 36 democratic OECD and/or EU-member countries. The data begins in 1959 for the 23 countries formerly included in the CPDS I, respectively, in 1966 for Malta, in 1976 for Cyprus, in 1990 for Bulgaria, Czech Republic, Hungary, Romania and Slovakia, in 1991 for Poland, in 1992 for Estonia and Lithuania, in 1993 for Latvia and Slovenia and in 2000 for Croatia. In order to obtain information on both the change of ideological composition and the following gap between the new an old cabinet, the supplement contains alternative data for the year 1959. The government variables in the main Comparative Political Data Set are based upon the data presented in this supplement. When using data from this data set, please quote both the data set and, where appropriate, the original source. Please quote this data set as: Klaus Armingeon, Sarah Engler and Lucas Leemann. 2021. Supplement to the Comparative Political Data Set – Government Composition 1960-2019. Zurich: Institute of Political Science, University of Zurich. These (former) assistants have made major contributions to the dataset, without which CPDS would not exist. In chronological and descending order: Angela Odermatt, Virginia Wenger, Fiona Wiedemeier, Christian Isler, Laura Knöpfel, Sarah Engler, David Weisstanner, Panajotis Potolidis, Marlène Gerber, Philipp Leimgruber, Michelle Beyeler, and Sarah Menegal.
    [Show full text]
  • PANSW Police News May-June 21.Pdf
    PRINT POST PUBLICATION NO. PP100018976 MAY | JUNE 2021 Police News THE SUCCESS OF RUN4BLUE NSW POLICE RUGBY LEAGUE This year’s Run4Blue raised a record amount of The NSWPRL City v Country fixture at Mudgee donations for Police Legacy ............................. p11 saw two tremendous games ............................ p21 If you’re hurt on duty, you need specialist help. It’s not just a matter of processing “ It takes extensive experience and a thorough a workers comp claim. It’s about understanding of the system, including the claiming absolutely everything pre-2012 rules, to properly manage a claim and make sure the officer receives absolutely you’re entitled to and with police everything they’re entitled to.” officers, that gets complicated. Unfortunately claims are often processed as When it comes to NSW police workers a standard workers comp claim, and the officer compensation claims, it would be very hard will never know what they missed out on. to find a more experienced solicitor than Chantille Khoury. Chantille is a principal at “ In particular, PTSD claims can result from Australia’s largest specialist personal injury exposure to traumatic events over a long period firm, Law Partners, where she specialises in of time, so care needs to be taken to build these police claims, from general duties officers to cases thoroughly. Many PTSD officers come to detectives and inspectors. me in their 40s and they’re broken. They start their careers at the academy very optimistic “ When officers are hurt on duty, medically retired about their future, but by the time I see them or no suitable duties can be found, many are they’re changed people.
    [Show full text]
  • Myanmar: Ethnic Politics and the 2020 General Election
    MYANMAR POLICY BRIEFING | 23 | September 2020 Myanmar: Ethnic Politics and the 2020 General Election KEY POINTS • The 2020 general election is scheduled to take place at a critical moment in Myanmar’s transition from half a century under military rule. The advent of the National League for Democracy to government office in March 2016 was greeted by all the country’s peoples as the opportunity to bring about real change. But since this time, the ethnic peace process has faltered, constitutional reform has not started, and conflict has escalated in several parts of the country, becoming emergencies of grave international concern. • Covid-19 represents a new – and serious – challenge to the conduct of free and fair elections. Postponements cannot be ruled out. But the spread of the pandemic is not expected to have a significant impact on the election outcome as long as it goes ahead within constitutionally-appointed times. The NLD is still widely predicted to win, albeit on reduced scale. Questions, however, will remain about the credibility of the polls during a time of unprecedented restrictions and health crisis. • There are three main reasons to expect NLD victory. Under the country’s complex political system, the mainstream party among the ethnic Bamar majority always win the polls. In the population at large, a victory for the NLD is regarded as the most likely way to prevent a return to military government. The Covid-19 crisis and campaign restrictions hand all the political advantages to the NLD and incumbent authorities. ideas into movement • To improve election performance, ethnic nationality parties are introducing a number of new measures, including “party mergers” and “no-compete” agreements.
    [Show full text]
  • Maintaining Party Unity: Analyzing the Conservative Party of Canada's
    Maintaining Party Unity: Analyzing the Conservative Party of Canada’s Integration of the Progressive Conservative and Canadian Alliance parties by Matthew Thompson A thesis submitted to the Faculty of Graduate and Postdoctoral Affairs in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Political Science Carleton University Ottawa, Ontario © 2017, Matthew Thompson Federal conservative parties in Canada have long been plagued by several persistent cleavages and internal conflict. This conflict has hindered the party electorally and contributed to a splintering of right-wing votes between competing right-wing parties in the 1990s. The Conservative Party of Canada (CPC) formed from a merger of the Progressive Conservative (PC) party and the Canadian Alliance in 2003. This analysis explores how the new party was able to maintain unity and prevent the long-standing cleavages from disrupting the party. The comparative literature on party factions is utilized to guide the analysis as the new party contained faction like elements. Policy issues and personnel/patronage distribution are stressed as significant considerations by the comparative literature as well literature on the PCs internal fighting. The analysis thus focuses on how the CPC approached these areas to understand how the party maintained unity. For policy, the campaign platforms, Question Period performance and government sponsored bills of the CPC are examined followed by an analysis of their first four policy conventions. With regards to personnel and patronage, Governor in Council and Senate appointments are analyzed, followed by the new party’s candidate nomination process and Stephen Harper’s appointments to cabinet. The findings reveal a careful and concentrated effort by party leadership, particularly Harper, at managing both areas to ensure that members from each of the predecessor parties were motivated to remain in the new party.
    [Show full text]
  • An Inquiry Into Contemporary Australian Extreme Right
    THE OTHER RADICALISM: AN INQUIRY INTO CONTEMPORARY AUSTRALIAN EXTREME RIGHT IDEOLOGY, POLITICS AND ORGANIZATION 1975-1995 JAMES SALEAM A Thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor Of Philosophy Department Of Government And Public Administration University of Sydney Australia December 1999 INTRODUCTION Nothing, except being understood by intelligent people, gives greater pleasure, than being misunderstood by blunderheads. Georges Sorel. _______________________ This Thesis was conceived under singular circumstances. The author was in custody, convicted of offences arising from a 1989 shotgun attack upon the home of Eddie Funde, Representative to Australia of the African National Congress. On October 6 1994, I appeared for Sentence on another charge in the District Court at Parramatta. I had been convicted of participation in an unsuccessful attempt to damage a vehicle belonging to a neo-nazi informer. My Thesis -proposal was tendered as evidence of my prospects for rehabilitation and I was cross-examined about that document. The Judge (whose Sentence was inconsequential) said: … Mr Saleam said in evidence that his doctorate [sic] of philosophy will engage his attention for the foreseeable future; that he has no intention of using these exertions to incite violence.1 I pondered how it was possible to use a Thesis to incite violence. This exercise in courtroom dialectics suggested that my thoughts, a product of my experiences in right-wing politics, were considered acts of subversion. I concluded that the Extreme Right was ‘The Other Radicalism’, understood by State agents as odorous as yesteryear’s Communist Party. My interest in Extreme Right politics derived from a quarter-century involvement therein, at different levels of participation.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter Five
    5 2WKHULVVXHV Funding and disclosure Funding entitlements 5.1 Part XX of the Commonwealth Electoral Act 1918 (Electoral Act) provides for public funding of election campaigns to be made available to candidates and political parties who receive at least four per cent of the formal first preference vote. This funding ensures candidates are not disadvantaged in their appeal to electors or unduly influenced in their subsequent actions by lack of access to adequate funding. 5.2 Mr and Mrs Whitton, Mr Arthur Tuck and Mr Goldstiver call for the elimination of public funding to political parties for election campaigns.1 G W Spence and Mr Lockett suggest a restriction be placed on the amount that can be spent on election campaigns to reduce the amount of public funding necessary.2 5.3 The public funding entitlements for the 1998 federal election, including the Newcastle supplementary election, totalled $33,920,787.43. The funding rate was 162.210 cents per vote3 and this has been paid to party agents and independent candidates as shown in Table 5.1. 1 Submissions pp S592 (H&M.Whitton), S667 (M.Goldstiver) and S1844 (A.Tuck) 2 Submissions pp S214 (GW.Spence) and S632-S633 (E.Lockett) 3 Australian Electoral Commission. 1999. Electoral Pocket Book, Canberra, AEC, p 57. 124 Table 5.1 1998 election funding payments Payee Amount - $ Australian Labor Party 13,959,511.97 Liberal Party of Australia 11,488,881.15 National Party of Australia 2,321,589.02 Northern Territory Country Liberal Party 116,916.10 Australian Democrats 2,247,677.46 Australian Greens
    [Show full text]
  • 2003 New South Wales Election
    2003 New South Wales Election Antony Green * On 22 March 2003 the NSW Labor Government led by Premier Bob Carr became the first government in Australia to win three consecutive four-year terms. The election brought little change to the composition of the Houses or in the vote. This account analyses the election result in the light of the fortunes of both Government and Opposition in the previous four years. The New South Wales election on 22 March 2003 was the third in the State since introduction of fixed four-year terms. As with its two predecessors, the election produced a campaign that struggled to move out of first gear. With fixed terms having denied the media and political parties the adrenalin fix of early election speculation, a peculiar form of political ballet seems to have developed, where the Government denies it has begun campaigning, the Opposition insists the Government has, and the media avoid treating the contest as a real campaign for as long as possible. As in 1995 and 1999, the Parliament was adjourned at the end of the previous year to a notional sitting week in February, providing a safety net in case Parliament needed to be re-convened. Parliament was prorogued on 31 January, though the campaign could not formally begin until the fixed-term provisions dissolved the Legislative Assembly on 28 February. 1 Writs were issued on the same day producing a 23-day campaign, four days longer than the minimum allowed under legislation. Nevertheless, this was still shorter than the minimum period permitted in any other state, and 10 days short of the minimum for Commonwealth elections.
    [Show full text]