DOCSLIB.ORG

Statement of Secretary of Defense Robert S. Mcnamara on The

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Statement of Secretary of Defense Robert S. Mcnamara on The For Official Use Only Until Released by the Senate Armed Services Committee STATEMENT OF SECRETARY OF DEFENSE ROBERT S. McNAMARA BEFORE THE SENATE ARMED SERVICES COMW ON THE FISCAL YEAR 1969-73 DEFENSE PROGRAM AND 1969 DEFENSE BUDGET Prepared 1/22/68 TABLE OF CONTENTS I . INTRODUCTION ..................................... 1 A . APPROACH TO THE FY 1969-73 PROGRAM AND THE FY 1969 BUDGET ........................... 1 B . ASSESSmNT OF THE INTERNATIONAL SITUATION AS IT BEARS ON MILITARY POLICIES AND PROGRAMS 2 The Communist Countries .................. a . The Soviet Union ..................... b . Red China ........................... Southeast Asia and Southwest Pacific Area Northeast Asia ........................... South Asia ............................... Middle East .............................. Africa ................................... Indian Ocean ............................ Latin America ............................ Europe and the NATO Area ................. United Nations ........................... C . MILITARY ASSISTANCE AND SALES ................ 32 D . IMPACT OF THE DEFENSE PROGRAM ON THE BALANCE OF PAYMENTS .............................. 36 E . CONCLUDING REMARKS ON THE INTERNATIONAL SITUATION ................................ 39 I1 . STRATEGIC FORCES ................................. 41 A . THE GENERAL NUCLEAR WAR PROBLEN .............. 41 B . THE SIZE AND CHARACTER OF THE THREAT ......... 54 1. The Soviet Strategic Offensive-Defensive Forces ................................ 54 a . Intercontinental Ballistic Missiles .. 55 b . Anti-Ballistic Missile Defense ....... 55 2 . Red Chinese Nuclear Threat ............... 56 Page No . C . CAPABILITIES OF THE PROPOSED U.S. FORCES FOR 11~~~~~~~DESTRUCTION"............... 56 1. Capability Against the "Highest Expected Threat" in the NIE .......... 57 2 . Capability Against "~reater-Than- Expected ~hreats".................... 59 D . CAPABILITIES OF THE PROPOSED FORCES FOR DAMAGE LIMITATION ....................... 61 1. Anti-Ballistic Missile Defense .......... 61 a . Defense Against the Red Chinese Nuclear Threat ................... 62 b . Deployment of NIKE-X for Defense of Our Cities Against Soviet Attack ........................... 63 2 . Anti-Bomber Defense ..................... 65 E . STRATEGIC OFFENSIVE FORCES .................. 70 1. Missile Forces .......................... 70 a . MINUTEMAN ........................... 70 b . TITAN I1............................ 70 c . POLARIS-POSEIDON .................... 71 d . New Strategic Missile Systems ....... 71 2 . Strategic Bomber Forces ................. 71 F . STRATEGIC DEFENSIVE FORCES .................. 72 Bomber Defense .......................... 72 a . Surveillance, Warning and Control ... 72 b . Manned Interceptors ................. 73 c . Surface-to-Air Missiles ............. 73 Missile and Space Defense ............... 73 a . Missile Warning ..................... 74 b . Anti-Ballistic Missile Defense ( SENTINEL) ....................... 74 c . Anti-Satellite Defense .............. 75 G . CIVIL DEFENSE ................................ 76 I11 . GENERAL PURPOSE FORCES .......................... 77 A . REQUIHEMENTS FOR GENERAL PURPOSE FORCES ..... 77 Page No . 1. NATO .................................... 2 . Asia .................................... a . India ............................... b . Taiwan .............................. c . Korea ............................... d . Southeast Asia ...................... 3. Control of the Seas ..................... B . LOGISTICS REQUIREMENTS ...................... C . CAPABILITIES OF THE GENERAL PURPOSE FORCES .. 1. Land Forces ............................. 2. Tactical Air Forces ..................... 3 . Anti-Submarine Warfare Forces ........... a . Submarines .......................... b . Air ASW Forces ...................... c . ASW Escorts ......................... 4. Fleet Anti-Air Warfare .................. 5 . Amphibious Assault ...................... 6. Theater Nuclear Forces .................. D . SOUTHEAST ASIA OPERATIONS ................... 1. The Communist Forces in South Vietnam ... 2 . The South Vietnamese Armed Forces ....... 3 . Other Free World Forces in South Vietnam 4. U.S. Forces in Southeast Asia ........... E . ARMY GENERAL PURPOSE FORCES ................. 1. DivisionIBrigade Forces ................. 2 . Supporting Forces ....................... 3 . Army Procurement ........................ 4. Reorganization of the Army Reserve Components .......................... F . NAVY GENERAL PURPOSE FORCES ................. 1. Attack Carrier Forces ................... a . Ships ............................... b . Carrier Aircraft .................... 2 . ASW Forces .............................. a . ASW Carriers ........................ iii Page No . b . Attack Submarine Forces ............. 123 c . Patrol Aircraft ..................... 124 d . Sonobuoys ........................... 124 e . Torpedoes ........................... 124 3 . Fleet Escorts ........................... 125 4. AmphibiousAssaultShips ................ 129 5 . Fire Support Ships ...................... 129 6. Mine Countermeasure Force ............... 130 7. Logistic , Operational Support, and Direct Support Ships ................ 130 8. Marine Corps Forces ..................... 131 9. Navy and Marine Corps Reserve Forces .... 132 G . AIR FORCE GENERAL PURPOSE FORCES ............ 133 1. Fighter and Attack ...................... 133 2 . Tactical Reconnaissance ................. 134 3 . Tactical Electronic Warfare Support ..... 135 4 . Night Warfare ........................... 135 5 . Special Air Warfare Forces .............. 135 6. Tactical Air Control .................... 135 7 . Tactical Missiles ....................... 136 8. Air National Guard ...................... 136 9 . Theater Air Base Vulnerability .......... 137 .IV. AIRLIFT AND SEALIFT FORCES ...................... 139 A . STRATEGIC MOVEMENT .......................... 139 B . TACTICAL MOVEMENT ........................... 144 C . AIR FORCE AIRLIFT ........................... 145 1. Active Forces ........................... 145 2 . Air Force Reserve ....................... 146 3 . Air National Guard ...................... 147 D . NAVY AIRLIFT ................................ 148 E . SEALIFT..................................... 148 RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT ........................ 149 A . OVERALL POLICY MATTERS ...................... 149 Page No . B . THE DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE SPACE PROGRAM ..... VI . OTHER MAJOR PROGRAMS ............................ A . INTELLIGENCE AND COMMUNICATIONS............. 1. Intelligence and Security ............... 2 . National Mili'tary Command System ........ 3 . Comunications .......................... 4. Other Specialized Activities ............ a . Weather Service ..................... b . Oceanography ........................ c . Air Rescue and Recovery ............. d . Nuclear Weapons ..................... B . CENTRAL SUPPLY AND MAINTENANCE .............. C . TRAINING. MEDICAL AND OTHER ................. 1. Training ................................ a . Recruit Training .................... b . Technical Training .................. c . Professional Training ............... d . Pilot Training ...................... e . Service Academies ................... 2 . Medical Services ........................ 3 . Retirement .............................. D . ADMINISTRATION AND ASSOCIATED ACTIVITIES .... 1. Contingencies ........................... 2 . Claims .................................. E . MISCELLANEOUS DEPARTMENT-WIDE ACTIVITIES .... VII . PERSONNEL MATTERS ............................... A . PERSONNEL STRENGTHS ......................... 1. Civilian Personnel Strengths ............ 2 . Military Personnel Strengths ............ B . VIETNAM-RELATED PERSONNEL MATTERS ........... C . MANPOWER PROCUREMENT ........................ Page No . D . MILITARY COMPENSATION ....................... 189 E . SPECIAL MILITARY MANPOWER MATTERS ........... 189 1. "Project 100.000" ....................... 189 2 . Project TRANSITION ...................... 190 F . EQUAL OPPORTUNITY ........................... 190 VIII . ORGANIZATION AND MANAGmNT ..................... 193 A . ORGANIZATIONAL CHANGES ...................... 195 B . THE DEFENSE DEPARTMENT COST REDUCTION PROGRAM................................. 198 1. The Initial Five-Year Program ........... 200 2 . The Permanent Cost Reduction Program .... 201 3. The Future Program ...................... 202 a . Buying Only What We Need ............ 203 b . Buying At The Lowest Sound Price .... 205 c . Reducing Operating Costs ............ 208 IX . FINANCIAL SWY............................... 211 TABLES TABLE NO. Page No. 1. Financial Summary.. 214 2. Financial Summary of Civil Defense..... ........... 215 3. Comparison of the Old (1961) and New (1968) Army Reserve Component Structures...... ........ 216 4. Reserve Components and ROTC ....................... 217 5. Department of Defense Cost Reduction Program.. 218 6. Amounts Requested for Aircraft, Missiles, Ships, and Tracked Combat Vehicles, Procurement Authorization in FY 1969 Compared with FY 1968........................................ 219 7. Source of Funds for Aircraft, Missiles, Ships, Tracked Combat Vehicles, FY 1969 Procurement Progr.............................. 220 STATEMENT OF SECRETARY OF DEFENSE ROBERT S. McNAMARA BEFORE THE SENATE AFUvlED SERVICES COMMITTEE ON THE FISCAL YEAR 1969-73 DEFENSE PROGRAM AND 1969 DEFENSE BUDGET Mr. Chairman and Members of the Committee: This is the seventh and final Five Year Defense
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Frequently Asked Questions
    Frequently Asked Questions What Types of Companies Are on the "Don't Test" List? This list includes companies that make cosmetics, personal-care products, household-cleaning products, and other common household products. All companies that are included on PETA's "don't test" list have signed our statement of assurance verifying that they and their ingredient suppliers don't conduct, commission, pay for, or allow any tests on animals for ingredients, formulations, or finished products anywhere in the world and will not do so in the future. We encourage consumers to support the companies on this list, since we know that they're committed to making products without harming animals. Companies on the "Do Test" list should be shunned until they implement a policy that prohibits animal testing. The "do test" list doesn't include companies that manufacture only products that are required by law to be tested on animals (e.g., pharmaceuticals and garden chemicals). Although PETA is opposed to all animal testing, our focus in those instances is less on the individual companies and more on the regulatory agencies that require animal testing. _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Legend V - The company makes or sells strictly vegan products. L - The company has licensed PETA's official cruelty-free bunny logo. F - The company is a PETA Business Friend, and shopping at this company supports an innovative partnership for compassionate companies willing to assist in PETA's groundbreaking work to stop animal abuse and suffering. Companies Whose Products Are Available in Russian Federation L F 100% Pure 510-836-6500 http://www.100percentpure.com L 3INA https://3ina.com/ V L 66°30 https://66-30.com/en/ V L Abyssal Japan Co.
    [Show full text]
  • Constellation Program Overview
    Constellation Program Overview October 2008 hris Culbert anager, Lunar Surface Systems Project Office ASA/Johnson Space Center Constellation Program EarthEarth DepartureDeparture OrionOrion -- StageStage CrewCrew ExplorationExploration VehicleVehicle AresAres VV -- HeavyHeavy LiftLift LaunchLaunch VehicleVehicle AltairAltair LunarLunar LanderLander AresAres II -- CrewCrew LaunchLaunch VehicleVehicle Lunar Capabilities Concept Review EstablishedEstablished Lunar Lunar Transportation Transportation EstablishEstablish Lunar Lunar Surface SurfaceArchitecturesArchitectures ArchitectureArchitecture Point Point of of Departure: Departure: StrategiesStrategies which: which: Satisfy NASA NGO’s to acceptable degree ProvidesProvides crew crew & & cargo cargo delivery delivery to to & & from from the the Satisfy NASA NGO’s to acceptable degree within acceptable schedule moonmoon within acceptable schedule Are consistent with capacity and capabilities ProvidesProvides capacity capacity and and ca capabilitiespabilities consistent consistent Are consistent with capacity and capabilities withwith candidate candidate surface surface architectures architectures ofof the the transportation transportation systems systems ProvidesProvides sufficient sufficient performance performance margins margins IncludeInclude set set of of options options fo for rvarious various prioritizations prioritizations of cost, schedule & risk RemainsRemains within within programmatic programmatic constraints constraints of cost, schedule & risk ResultsResults in in acceptable
    [Show full text]
  • NASA Process for Limiting Orbital Debris
    NASA-HANDBOOK NASA HANDBOOK 8719.14 National Aeronautics and Space Administration Approved: 2008-07-30 Washington, DC 20546 Expiration Date: 2013-07-30 HANDBOOK FOR LIMITING ORBITAL DEBRIS Measurement System Identification: Metric APPROVED FOR PUBLIC RELEASE – DISTRIBUTION IS UNLIMITED NASA-Handbook 8719.14 This page intentionally left blank. Page 2 of 174 NASA-Handbook 8719.14 DOCUMENT HISTORY LOG Status Document Approval Date Description Revision Baseline 2008-07-30 Initial Release Page 3 of 174 NASA-Handbook 8719.14 This page intentionally left blank. Page 4 of 174 NASA-Handbook 8719.14 This page intentionally left blank. Page 6 of 174 NASA-Handbook 8719.14 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 SCOPE...........................................................................................................................13 1.1 Purpose................................................................................................................................ 13 1.2 Applicability ....................................................................................................................... 13 2 APPLICABLE AND REFERENCE DOCUMENTS................................................14 3 ACRONYMS AND DEFINITIONS ...........................................................................15 3.1 Acronyms............................................................................................................................ 15 3.2 Definitions .........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Sounding Rockets 2013 Annual Report
    National Aeronautics and Space Administration NASA Sounding Rockets Annual Report 2013 The NASA Sounding Rockets Program has closed another highly successful op- erational year with the completion of 19 successful flights. As of October 2013, the program has had 100% success on 38 flights over a period of 24 months. This is an impressive accomplishment. The scientific teams, the technical and administrative sounding rocket staff, and the launch ranges are to be congratu- lated on a job well done! This year involved flights from Wallops Flight Facility (Virginia), White Sands Missile Range (New Mexico), the Kwajalein Atoll (Marshall Islands), and Poker Flat Research Range (Alaska). The Kwajalein campaign involved four rockets designed to probe the equatorial ionosphere and gain a better understanding of plasma energies and particle dynamics af- fecting the Earth. Multiple telescope missions were flown from White Sands Missile Range to study the Sun, the interstellar medium, and distant galaxies. Message from the Chief Message Flights from Wallops and Alaska have furthered our understanding of how the Phil Eberspeaker Earth and Sun interact. With every flight, NASA added to the body of scien- Chief, Sounding Rockets Program Office tific knowledge that will help unravel a host of scientific mysteries. The Sounding Rockets Program also continued to cultivate young minds by offering two university-level flight opportunities. Approximately 250 students from universities around the country had the opportunity to fly experiments aboard two-stage sounding rockets in 2013. The Sounding Rockets Program once again provided a unique teacher training workshop known as WRATS. With the knowledge obtained from this experience, teachers returned to the classroom with exciting options for enhancing their STEM curriculum.
    [Show full text]
  • ALTAIR - Design & Progress on the Space Launch Vehicle Design
    DOI: 10.13009/EUCASS2017-575 7TH EUROPEAN CONFERENCE FOR AERONAUTICS AND SPACE SCIENCES (EUCASS) ALTAIR - Design & Progress on the Space Launch Vehicle Design Cédric Dupont*, Andrea Tromba*, Bastien Haemmerli**, Eduard Diez*** , Giulio Molinari****, Christoph Karl**** * Bertin Technologies, France – [email protected], [email protected] **NAMMO Raufoss AS, P.O. Box 162, NO-2831 Raufoss, Norway – [email protected] *** GTD Sistemas de Información S.A, Spain - [email protected] ***** ETH Zürich, Switzerland – [email protected], [email protected] Abstract ALTAIR is an innovative air-launch system consisting of a reusable unmanned aircraft carrier, an expendable launch vehicle and a cost-effective ground segment. The autonomous aircraft brings the launcher at altitude; following the release, the launcher boosts the payload to the intended orbit. This paper presents the launcher design at the project mid-term. Primary aims of the development are risk mitigation, cost savings, reliability and high performance. The project leverages collaborative engineering, design-to-cost techniques and multidisciplinary design optimization strategies. The resulting design utilizes low-cost hybrid propulsion, lightweight composite structures, innovative avionics and a smart multi-mission upper-stage to simultaneously attain all goals. 1. Introduction The market of satellite launches will drastically change in the coming decade. While being nowadays monopolised by the needs of massive and expensive satellites, requiring heavy launchers of the size of the Proton M, Delta IV or Ariane 5, it is foreseen that another product will take a large share of the global market: small satellites in the 50-150 kg range. This growth will be mainly driven by two factors.
    [Show full text]
  • ALTAIR Orbital Module Preliminary Mission and System Design
    DOI: 10.13009/EUCASS2017-221 7TH EUROPEAN CONFERENCE FOR AERONAUTICS AND SPACE SCIENCES (EUCASS) ALTAIR Orbital Module Preliminary Mission and System Design Andrea Tromba*, Cédric Dupont*, Giulio Molinari**, Christoph Karl** and Eduard Diez*** * Bertin Technologies, France - [email protected], [email protected] ** ETH Zürich, Switzerland - [email protected], [email protected] *** GTD Sistemas de Información S.A, Spain - [email protected] Abstract This paper presents the preliminary system and mission design of the Altair Orbital Module, a cost- effective and versatile multi-mission platform able to provide a dedicated and reliable orbit injection service for micro-payloads. An innovative approach relaying on a sustained use of design to cost and multidisciplinary design optimization techniques has been applied from the very beginning of the design phase to meet both performances and cost requirements. The system has then been conceived to assure high mission flexibility, allowing accommodation of either single or multiple payloads and providing accurate and safe deployment in a range of LEO target orbits. The final reference design consists in a lightweight composite structure, an innovative avionics and a dedicated monopropellant system based on environment friendly hydrogen peroxide, which provides multiple burst capability for orbital transfer manoeuvring as well as attitude control and de-orbiting capabilities. 1. Introduction The market of small satellites under 200 kg is expected to increase dramatically in the next decades due to several factors such as miniaturization, availability of Commercial Off-the-Shelf (COTS) components and constellation projects. However, currently no launch system adequately addresses this market without the constraints of existing solutions such as piggyback launch.
    [Show full text]
  • Proton (UR-500) Family Home Launch Vehicles USSR / Russia
    Please make a donation to support Gunter's Space Page. Thank you very much for visiting Gunter's Space Page. I hope that this site is useful a nd informative for you. If you appreciate the information provided on this site, please consider supporting my work by making a simp le and secure donation via PayPal. Please help to run the website and keep everything free of charge. Thank you very much. Proton (UR-500) family Home Launch Vehicles USSR / Russia Proton Proton-K Proton-K Blok-D (Zond L1) Proton-K Blok-D-1 (Granat) [ILS] Proton-K Blok-DM-2 Proton-K Blok-DM1 (Inmarsat-3 F3) similar: Proton-K Blok-D, Proton-K Blok-D-2 Proton-K Blok-DM2 Proton-K Blok-DM3 Proton-M Briz-M (Thor 5) [ILS] similar: Proton-K Blok-DM-5 similar: Proton-K Blok-DM4, similar: Proton-K Briz-M Proton-K Blok-DM-2M Version Stage 1 Stage 2 Stage 3 Stage 4 Proton (8K82) 8S810 / 6 × RD-253 8S811 / 3 × RD-0208 + 1 × RD-0209 - - Proton-K (8K82K) 8S810 / 6 × RD-253 8S811 / 3 × RD-0210 + 1 × RD-0211 8S812 / RD-0212 - Proton-K Blok-D (8K82K 11S824) 8S810 / 6 × RD-253 8S811 / 3 × RD-0210 + 1 × RD-0211 8S812 / RD-0212 Blok-D / RD-58 Proton-K Blok-D-1 (8K82K 11S824M) 8S810 / 6 × RD-253 8S811 / 3 × RD-0210 + 1 × RD-0211 8S812 / RD-0212 Blok-D-1 / RD-58M Proton-K Blok-D-2 (8K82K 11S824F) 8S810 / 6 × RD-253 8S811 / 3 × RD-0210 + 1 × RD-0211 8S812 / RD-0212 Blok-D-2 / RD-58M Proton-K Blok-DM (8K82K 11S86) 8S810 / 6 × RD-253 8S811 / 3 × RD-0210 + 1 × RD-0211 8S812 / RD-0212 Blok-DM / RD-58M Proton-K Blok-DM-2 (8K82K 11S861) 8S810 / 6 × RD-253 8S811 / 3 × RD-0210 + 1 × RD-0211 8S812
    [Show full text]
  • Ares V Launch Vehicle
    National Aeronautics and Space Administration Lunar Program Industry Briefing: Ares V Overview Steve Cook Manager, Ares Projects Office www.nasa.gov Ares Projects Overview ♦ Deliver crew and cargo for missions to International Space Station (ISS), the Moon and beyond ♦ Continuing progress toward design, component testing, and early flight testing ♦ Ares I Crew Launch Vehicle • Carries 6 crew to ISS, 4 to Moon • First flight test scheduled in 2009 • Initial Operational Capability in 2015 ♦ Ares V Cargo Launch Vehicle • Launches Earth Departure Stage (EDS), Altair and Orion to Low Earth Orbit for lunar missions • Largest launch vehicle ever designed • Ongoing concept design work leading into detailed development work starting in 2011 • First flight test planned in 2018 National Aeronautics and Space Administration 2 Ares V Cargo Launch Vehicle Heavy Lift for Science and Exploration ♦ Key transportation system for exploration beyond Low Earth Orbit • Offers unique payload capabilities opening new doors to human exploration on the Moon and beyond • Designed for routine crew and cargo transportation to the Moon − EDS + Altair to LEO − EDS + Altair + Orion to TLI • Considered national asset creating new opportunities for science, national security and space business • Capable of transporting more than 71 metric tons to the Moon • Focal point for design and development located at MSFC with support across the Agency National Aeronautics and Space Administration 3 Building on a Foundation of Proven Technologies Launch Vehicle Comparisons 122 m
    [Show full text]
  • From Apollo LM to Altair: Design, Environments, Infrastructure, Missions, and Operations
    AIAA SPACE 2009 Conference & Exposition AIAA 2009-6404 14 - 17 September 2009, Pasadena, California From Apollo LM to Altair: Design, Environments, Infrastructure, Missions, and Operations Marc M. Cohen∗ Northrop Grumman Corporation, El Segundo, CA 90245 Abstract This essay presents a comparison between the Apollo Lunar Module (LM) and the current concepts and requirements for the Altair Lunar Lander. The basis of comparison reflects the difference between the Apollo Program, pursuing a Cold War era “Flag and Footsteps” mission, and the Constellation Program creating a more expansive program of exploration leading to a permanent human presence on the moon. The specific areas of comparison derive largely from the changes in mission philosophy and exploration strategy – not from technology or engineering. These factors illuminate the differences in the current design drivers for the Altair compared to the Apollo LM. Nomenclature ALARA As Low As Reasonably Achievable, refers to radiation exposure. ALHAT Autonomous Lander Hazard Avoidance Technology. Altair NASA’s Lunar Lander to return crew and cargo to the moon. Ascent Module The Altair module with the flight crew station where the crew pilot the vehicle; the Ascent Module launches from the surface to return the crew to the Orion in LLO, leaving the DM behind. Ascent Stage The Apollo LM module with the flight crew station where the crew pilot the vehicle. The Ascent Stage launches from the surface to return the crew to the CSM in LLO, leaving the Descent Stage behind. BFO Blood forming organs. CARD Constellation Architecture Requirements Document, NASA CxP-70000. CEV Crew Exploration Vehicle. CM The Apollo Command Module, also the Orion Crew Module.
    [Show full text]
  • New Rocket Guide
    National Aeronautics and Space Administration Educator Guide 1 www.nasa.gov rockets U S AAA eates an eaction rocket U N I Pronunciation: \rä-kət\ noun (It rocchetta) T ockets are self- E D A vehicle, typically cylindrical, containing liquidS or solid T propellants which produce hot gases or ionsA that are ejected T rearward through a nozzle and, in doing so,E cr action force accompanied by an opposite Sand equal r force driving the vehicle forward. Because r contained, they are able to operate in outer space. DISCOVERY 2 National Aeronautics and Space Administration ROCKETS Educator’s Guide with Activities in Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics This publication is in the Public Domain and is not protected by copyright. Permission is not required for duplication. EG-2008-05-060-KSC 3 Acknowledgements The original Rockets Teacher Guide was Special Thanks To: published by NASA’s Education Division in the NASA Headquarters mid-1990s. It has found widespread use in Jerry G. Hartman both formal and informal educational settings Merrill King, Ph.D. because of the exciting nature of the topic and Allota Taylor because of its dynamic classroom activities Carla Rosenberg that match and support both national and state education standards for science, mathematics, Special appreciation is extended and technology. to NASA's Exploration Systems Mission Direcorate and Space This revision of the guide, by the original Operations Mission Directorate authors, updates educators on NASA’s 21st for their generosity and Century Space Exploration Policy and the commitment to the continuation vehicles that will make this vision possible.
    [Show full text]
  • Primary & Secondary Sources
    Primary & Secondary Sources Brands & Products Agencies & Clients Media & Content Influencers & Licensees Organizations & Associations Government & Education Research & Data Multicultural Media Forecast 2019: Primary & Secondary Sources COPYRIGHT U.S. Multicultural Media Forecast 2019 Exclusive market research & strategic intelligence from PQ Media – Intelligent data for smarter business decisions In partnership with the Alliance for Inclusive and Multicultural Marketing at the Association of National Advertisers Co-authored at PQM by: Patrick Quinn – President & CEO Leo Kivijarv, PhD – EVP & Research Director Editorial Support at AIMM by: Bill Duggan – Group Executive Vice President, ANA Claudine Waite – Director, Content Marketing, Committees & Conferences, ANA Carlos Santiago – President & Chief Strategist, Santiago Solutions Group Except by express prior written permission from PQ Media LLC or the Association of National Advertisers, no part of this work may be copied or publicly distributed, displayed or disseminated by any means of publication or communication now known or developed hereafter, including in or by any: (i) directory or compilation or other printed publication; (ii) information storage or retrieval system; (iii) electronic device, including any analog or digital visual or audiovisual device or product. PQ Media and the Alliance for Inclusive and Multicultural Marketing at the Association of National Advertisers will protect and defend their copyright and all their other rights in this publication, including under the laws of copyright, misappropriation, trade secrets and unfair competition. All information and data contained in this report is obtained by PQ Media from sources that PQ Media believes to be accurate and reliable. However, errors and omissions in this report may result from human error and malfunctions in electronic conversion and transmission of textual and numeric data.
    [Show full text]
  • Solid Rocket Motors; SRM's) Will Be Described with the Purpose to Form a Database, Which Allows for Comparative Analysis and Applications in Practical SRM Engineering
    SOME TYPICAL SOLID PROPELLANT ROCKET MOTORS Memorandum M-712 (Version 2.0) Ir. B.T.C. ZANDBERGEN December 2013 Faculty of Aerospace Engineering Organization: TUD/LR/A2R Date: December 2013 Document code: M-712 (Version 2.0) Page: ii Preface This document is published within the framework of a Lecture Series on Chemical Rocket Propulsion at TU-Delft, Faculty of Aerospace Engineering and intends to provide the (future) propulsion engineer with a starting point for practical solid propellant rocket motor engineering. This document is intended as a lively document. Hence, I would like to encourage any reader to provide the author with 'missing' information and/or suggestions for improvement of this document. In addition, the author wishes to thank Ernst Hesper of TU-Delft, Faculty of Aerospace Engineering, for the careful proofreading of version 1.0 of this publication and for providing many useful comments. Version 2.0 differs from version 1.0 in that two additions (Vega P80 and Ariane 4 separation motors) and some textual improvements have been made. Organization: TUD/LR/A2R Date: December 2013 Document code: M-712 (Version 2.0) Page: iii Table of contents Preface ................................................................................................................................................... 2 List of acronyms ..................................................................................................................................... 4 Introduction ...........................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]