Heritage Management Plan Final Report

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Heritage Management Plan Final Report Australian War Memorial Heritage Management Plan Final Report Prepared by Godden Mackay Logan Heritage Consultants for the Australian War Memorial January 2011 Report Register The following report register documents the development and issue of the report entitled Australian War Memorial—Heritage Management Plan, undertaken by Godden Mackay Logan Pty Ltd in accordance with its quality management system. Godden Mackay Logan operates under a quality management system which has been certified as complying with the Australian/New Zealand Standard for quality management systems AS/NZS ISO 9001:2008. Job No. Issue No. Notes/Description Issue Date 06-0420 1 Draft Report July 2008 06-0420 2 Second Draft Report August 2008 06-0420 3 Third Draft Report September 2008 06-0420 4 Fourth Draft Report April 2009 06-0420 5 Final Draft Report (for public comment) September 2009 06-0420 6 Final Report January 2011 Contents Page Glossary of Terms Abbreviations Conservation Terms Sources Executive Summary......................................................................................................................................i How To Use This Report .............................................................................................................................v 1.0 Introduction............................................................................................................................................1 1.1 Background..........................................................................................................................................1 1.2 Previous Conservation Management Plans .......................................................................................1 1.3 Location of the Site..............................................................................................................................2 1.4 Heritage Listings..................................................................................................................................2 1.5 The AWM Heritage Register...............................................................................................................3 1.6 Limitations............................................................................................................................................4 1.7 Authorship............................................................................................................................................4 1.8 Endnotes..............................................................................................................................................7 2.0 Understanding the Place......................................................................................................................9 2.1 The Topographic Context....................................................................................................................9 2.2 Aboriginal Cultural Heritage ................................................................................................................9 2.2.1 Cultural and Historical Context.....................................................................................................9 2.2.2 Aboriginal Archaeological Sensitivity .........................................................................................10 2.3 Historical Context...............................................................................................................................11 2.4 Description of the Place ....................................................................................................................14 2.4.1 The Main War Memorial Building...............................................................................................15 2.4.2 The Commemorative Area.........................................................................................................15 2.4.3 The Galleries...............................................................................................................................21 2.4.4 The Dioramas .............................................................................................................................22 2.4.5 ANZAC Hall.................................................................................................................................23 2.4.6 The Outpost Café .......................................................................................................................23 2.4.7 The Administration Building........................................................................................................24 2.4.8 CEW Bean Building....................................................................................................................24 2.4.9 The Landscape...........................................................................................................................24 2.4.10 The Lone Pine ..........................................................................................................................25 2.4.11 The Sculpture Garden ..............................................................................................................26 2.4.12 Site Vegetation and Natural Heritage ......................................................................................26 2.4.13 Remembrance Driveway..........................................................................................................27 2.5 Endnotes............................................................................................................................................28 3.0 Assessment of Heritage Values........................................................................................................31 3.1 Identifying Heritage Values ...............................................................................................................31 3.1.1 Heritage Value ............................................................................................................................31 3.1.2 Indigenous Heritage Values .......................................................................................................31 3.1.3 Natural Heritage Values .............................................................................................................32 Australian War Memorial—Heritage Management Plan—Final Report, January 2011 3.2 Commonwealth and National Heritage Criteria................................................................................32 3.2.1 Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (Cwlth)................................32 3.3 The Methods Used to Assess the Values ........................................................................................33 3.4 Assessments of the Heritage Values of the AWM ...........................................................................34 3.4.1 Other Values ...............................................................................................................................37 3.5 Statements of Heritage Values for the Component Parts of AWM .................................................39 3.6 Summary of the Heritage Values......................................................................................................43 3.7 Tolerance for Change of the Heritage Values..................................................................................43 3.8 Endnotes............................................................................................................................................46 4.0 Legislative and Management Framework Affecting Conservation Issues.................................47 4.1 Introduction ........................................................................................................................................47 4.2 The Legislative and Management Framework.................................................................................47 4.2.1 Australian War Memorial Act 1980 (Cwlth)................................................................................47 4.2.2 Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (Cwlth)................................48 4.2.3 Statutory Listings—Commonwealth...........................................................................................50 4.2.4 Statutory Listings—ACT .............................................................................................................51 4.2.5 Non-statutory Listings.................................................................................................................51 4.2.6 Australian Capital Territory (Planning and Land Management) Act 1988 (Cwlth) ...................52 4.2.7 National Memorials Ordinance 1928 .........................................................................................54 4.3 Key Conservation Issues Analysis....................................................................................................54 4.3.1 Visitation Numbers......................................................................................................................54 4.3.2 Condition of the Heritage Values ...............................................................................................55 4.3.3 Ongoing Management Issues ....................................................................................................56 4.3.4 Indigenous Cultural Issues .........................................................................................................57
Recommended publications
  • Thinking About Architecture and Portraiture
    18 PORTRAIT 33 PORTRAIT 33 19 Thinking about architecture and portraiture Portraits + Architecture is an experiment. In the twenty-first century the social, The exhibition at the National Portrait cultural and ecological imperatives Gallery presents the work of seven of architectural practice resonate leading Australian architect teams with strongly with artistic, philosophical commissioned photographic portraits and sociopolitical ideas and actions. by seven Australian photographers. Many architects, designers, artists and The participants have been asked to writers are interested in how issues think about their creative practice in of sustainability and ethics relate to a new way. Portraits + Architecture innovation and creativity in technology, explores the relationship between aesthetics and functionality. We are creative thinking and identity and increasingly aware of the impact of incorporates new photographic portraits the built environment on our daily of creative individuals and groups. lives, how the design of our dwellings, The architect teams are known for workplaces and public spaces affects our their contemporary and highly distinctive psychological and physical wellbeing. work. They have made significant Portraits + Architecture explores contributions to Australian architecture the thinking that informs creative and design culture. The photographers architecture practice rather than work across a spectrum of fine art, the details of specific buildings or commercial, and design practice and architectural projects. The selection of have produced bold and original the participating architect teams was photographic portraits for the exhibition. based on the original nature of their 20 PORTRAIT 33 PORTRAIT 33 21 practice. As a group, they represent a photographer to create a suite of portrait Portrait of CO-AP 2009 in the exhibition entry zone, where diversity of scale, working from different photographs in response to a defined Ross Honeysett visitors are invited to participate in locations in Australia.
    [Show full text]
  • John Gorton Building and Former Communications Centre
    Register of Significant Architecture RSTCA No: R085 Name of Place: John Gorton Building and former Communications Centre Other/Former Names: Administrative Building, Parkes Address/Location: Parkes Place, corner of King Edward Terrace, Parkes, ACT Block 1 Section 35 of Parkes Listing Status: Registered Other Heritage Listings: CHL, RNE, Part of Parliamentary Vista. Date of Listing: 15 December 1994 Level of Significance: Regional Citation Revision No: 2 Category: Government Citation Revision Date: 1 March 2017 Style: Stripped Classical Dates of Design: 1924, 1946, 1974 Designers: G Sydney Jones/Robertson & Marks, Dept of Interior, Dept of Works & Housing Construction Period: 1947-1956, 1977 Client/Owner/Lessee: Commonwealth of Australia Date of Addition: 1977 Builder: 1947 Concrete Constructions of Sydney STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE The John Gorton Building resulted from the winning Academic Classical style design in a 1924 Federal Capital Advisory Committee architectural competition for an administrative building. Only the siting and general layout of that design were followed when the building was redesigned in 1946 in the Inter-War Stripped Classical style and completed in 1956. It is a rare large-scale example of a public office building in that style. Key indicators of the style displayed in the building include: symmetrical facades; divisions into vertical bays indicating classical origins; vestigial classical columns; simple surfaces and spandrels between storeys subdued to emphasize verticality. Good use of light wells allows internal office areas to be well lit by daylight. Design elements which retain a high level of integrity are the exterior, foyer, lift lobbies and central corridors. The former underground Communications Centre, added in 1977, is a unique windowless secure environment for Government activities, with design elements, particularly in the foyer, evocative of the period – a mural, luminous ceilings, bright chrome pillars, curved walls, wall hangings by artist/weavers and plant containers.
    [Show full text]
  • Art Gallery of Ballarat Annual Report 10-11 Annual Report
    Art Gallery of Ballarat Annual Report 10-11 Annual Report 2010-11 ISSN 0726-5530 Chair’s Report .................................................................................................4 Art Gallery of Ballarat ACN: 145 246 224 Director’s Report .........................................................................................6 ABN: 28 145 246 224 Association Report .....................................................................................8 40 Lydiard Street North Ballarat Victoria 3350 Women’s Association Report ............................................................10 T 03 5320 5858 F 03 5320 5791 Gallery Guides Report ...........................................................................11 [email protected] Acquisitions ...................................................................................................13 www.artgalleryofballarat.com.au Outward Loan ..............................................................................................27 Exhibitions ......................................................................................................31 Public Programs ........................................................................................35 Education Visits and Programs ..........................................................37 Adopt an Artwork ......................................................................................40 Donations, Gifts and Bequests .........................................................41 Gallery Staff and Volunteers
    [Show full text]
  • The National Capital Canberra
    EXPLORING CIVICS AND CITIZENSHIP Through a visit to the national capital canberra UPPER PRIMARY Student Resource Book A classroom resource to support the Parliament and Civics Education Rebate (PACER) program EXPLORING CIVICS AND CITIZENSHIP Through a Visit to the National Capital, Canberra Upper Primary Student Resource Book A classroom resource to support the PACER program ISBN: 978-0-642-77926-7 (PDF) ISBN: 978-0-642-77927-4 (RTF) First published 2008 Second edition 2010 © 2010 This work is copyright. Permission is given by the Commonwealth for this booklet and CD-ROM to be copied without payment by educational institutions within Australia solely for educational purposes. Any other use will require written permission of the Department of Education, Employment and Workplace Relations (DEEWR) and may require the written permission of other copyright owners. Copies should include this copyright statement or an appropriate acknowledgement. All other rights are reserved. Apart from any use permitted above or under the Copyright Act 1968, no part of this booklet or CD-ROM may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, including electronic, digital, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without prior permission of DEEWR. To the best of DEEWR’s knowledge, copyright permission has been obtained for any non-Commonwealth material used in this booklet and for the use of such material for educational purposes. If you believe there has been an error or omission in any of the material, please contact DEEWR. For inquiries about reproduction or other uses of this publication, please contact the Department of Education, Employment and Workplace Relations at www.deewr.gov.au/.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendices 2011–12
    Art GAllery of New South wAleS appendices 2011–12 Sponsorship 73 Philanthropy and bequests received 73 Art prizes, grants and scholarships 75 Gallery publications for sale 75 Visitor numbers 76 Exhibitions listing 77 Aged and disability access programs and services 78 Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander programs and services 79 Multicultural policies and services plan 80 Electronic service delivery 81 Overseas travel 82 Collection – purchases 83 Collection – gifts 85 Collection – loans 88 Staff, volunteers and interns 94 Staff publications, presentations and related activities 96 Customer service delivery 101 Compliance reporting 101 Image details and credits 102 masterpieces from the Musée Grants received SPONSORSHIP National Picasso, Paris During 2011–12 the following funding was received: UBS Contemporary galleries program partner entity Project $ amount VisAsia Council of the Art Sponsors Gallery of New South Wales Nelson Meers foundation Barry Pearce curator emeritus project 75,000 as at 30 June 2012 Asian exhibition program partner CAf America Conservation work The flood in 44,292 the Darling 1890 by wC Piguenit ANZ Principal sponsor: Archibald, Japan foundation Contemporary Asia 2,273 wynne and Sulman Prizes 2012 President’s Council TOTAL 121,565 Avant Card Support sponsor: general Members of the President’s Council as at 30 June 2012 Bank of America Merill Lynch Conservation support for The flood Steven lowy AM, Westfield PHILANTHROPY AC; Kenneth r reed; Charles in the Darling 1890 by wC Piguenit Holdings, President & Denyse
    [Show full text]
  • Olympic Memorabilia89
    OLYMPIC MEMORABILIA89 MAIL BID AUCTION 89: APRIL 24, 2021 INGRID O’NEIL Lot 11 Third Place Winner’s Diploma Awarded for 50 Kilometer Skiing to M. J. Grothumsbraaten from Norway at the Chamonix 1924 First Winter Olympic Games Cover Illustrations Lot 1 Participation Medal struck in Gold for Stockholm 1912 President Viktor Balck – the Third Known Gold Medal for the Stockholm 1912 Olympic Games, the First Two Medals belonging to the Swedish King and the Crown Prince Lot 2 The Badge for the Emperor of Japan and the Imperial Family at the Tokyo 1964 Olympic Games Back Cover Illustration Lot 3 Original Painting “Atlanta 1996” by Famous Painter Michel Delacroix Commissioned by the IOC and the USOC for the Centennial Olympic Games in Atlanta 1996 OLYMPIC GAMES MEMORABILIA 1896–2020 Mail Bid Auction No. 89 Closing at 8 pm Pacific Time (Los Angeles) Saturday, April 24, 2021 The Auction will take place Online at auctions.ioneil.com www.ioneil.com Bids by Email, Phone, Mail and Fax are Welcome Ingrid O’Neil Auctions, Inc. Sports and Olympic Memorabilia P.O. Box 265 Tel: (949) 715-9808 Corona Del Mar, CA 92625 USA Fax: (949) 715-1871 Email: [email protected] ©2021 Ingrid O’Neil Auctions, Inc. Sports and Olympic Memorabilia INGRID O’NEIL AUCTIONS, INC. MAIL BID AUCTION 89 Tel: (949) 715-9808 Sports and Olympic Memorabilia Saturday, April 24, 2021 Fax: (949) 715-1871 P.O. Box 265 Online Auction www.ioneil.com Email: [email protected] Corona Del Mar, CA 92625 USA auctions.ioneil.com Bids by Email, Phone, Mail and Fax accepted TERMS OF SALE (Please read carefully before bidding.) The auction will be conducted in accordance with the terms set forth below.
    [Show full text]
  • National Capital Authority
    NATIONAL CAPITAL AUTHORITY Submission to House of Representatives Standing Committee on Environment and Heritage Sustainable Cities 2025 1. INTRODUCTION The National Capital Authority has prepared this submission in response to the inquiry by the House of Representatives Standing Committee on Environment and Heritage into issues and policies related to the development of sustainable cities to the year 2025. The Authority has been guided in its response by the Terms of Reference for the Inquiry provided by the Standing Committee: Terms of Reference • The environmental and social impacts of sprawling urban development; • The major determinants of urban settlement patterns and desirable patterns of development for the growth of Australian cities; • A ‘blueprint’ for ecologically sustainable patterns of settlement, with particular reference to eco-efficiency and equity in the provision of services and infrastructure; • Measures to reduce the environmental, social and economic costs of continuing urban expansion; and • Mechanisms for the Commonwealth to bring about urban development reform and promote ecologically sustainable patterns of settlement. The Authority’s submission provides the relevant background information on the Authority's role in planning and development in the ACT, and how the Authority both addresses and influences sustainability in its role to achieve ‘a National Capital which symbolises Australia’s heritage, values and aspirations, is internationally recognised, and which Australian’s are proud’. It sets out the provisions of the National Capital Plan applicable to sustainability and identifies initiatives undertaken by the Authority to create a more sustainable environment. 2. NATIONAL CAPITAL AUTHORITY The National Capital Planning Authority was established in 1989 as part of the introduction of self-government in the ACT, with a view to securing the Federal Government’s continuing interest in the planning and development of Canberra as Australia’s National Capital.
    [Show full text]
  • Australian War Memorial
    Commonwealth of Australia Gazette No. S 64, Tuesday, 25 April 2006 SPECIAL Published by the Commonwealth of Australia Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 INCLUSION OF A PLACE IN THE NATIONAL HERITAGE LIST I, Ian Gordon Campbell, Minister for the Environment and Heritage, having considered, in relation to the place listed in the Schedule of this instrument - (a) the Australian Heritage Council’s assessment whether the place meets any of the National Heritage criteria; and (b) the comments given to the Council under section 324G of the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999; and being satisfied that the place specified in the Schedule has the National Heritage value or values specified in the Schedule include, pursuant to section 324J of the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999, the place listed in the Schedule in the National Heritage List. Dated 20 April 2006 [SIGNED] Ian Gordon Campbell Minister for the Environment and Heritage Cat. No. S6406 ISSN 1032-2345 © Commonwealth of Australia 2006 Commonwealth of Australia Gazette Commonwealth of Australia Gazette 2 Special Gazette No. S 64, 25 April 2006 No. S 64, 25 April 2006 Special Gazette 3 SCHEDULE STATE/TERRITORY Name: Location / Boundary Criteria / Values AUSTRALIAN CAPITAL TERRITORY Australian War Memorial and the Memorial Parade: About 25ha, in Reid and Campbell, comprising the whole of Anzac Parade (including the median strip) from the northern alignment of Constitution Avenue to the southern boundary of Section 39 Reid; Anzac Park (comprising Block 1 Section 41 Reid, Block 4 Section 39 Reid, Block 1 Section 1 Campbell, Block 2 Section 60 Campbell); the whole of Section 39 Campbell; that part of Limestone Avenue to the east of the alignment of the south-eastern most boundary of Block 5 Section 39 Reid; and that part of Fairbairn Avenue to the west of the alignment of the north west boundary of Block 3 Section 60 Campbell.
    [Show full text]
  • OBJECT BIOGRAPHY John Smith Murdoch's Drawing Instruments
    Landmarks: People and Places across Australia, a gallery bringing together over 1500 objects, explores the history of Australia since European settlement. OBJECT BIOGRAPHY John Smith Murdoch’s drawing instruments In 2009, the National Museum of Australia acquired a collection of drawing instruments including pens, compasses and rulers, housed in a leather-bound presentation case. On the front of the case is a silver plaque engraved with the following: ‘Presented to John S Murdoch, Architect / by a few friends on the occasion / of his leaving Elgin for Inverness. 18 Boxed set of drawing instruments November 1881.’ belonging to John Smith Murdoch, about 1881. Photo: Lannon Harley, National Museum of Australia. The case contains fifteen individual drawing instruments, which are stored in a moulded tray, lined with blue grosgrain and silk fabric, and a recessed storage compartment in the lid. The lid lining is stamped with ‘W H Harling, Mathematical Instrument Manufacturer, 40 Hatton Garden, London’ and the company’s crest. The recessed lid compartment contains a sector, protractor and parallel rule. In the 1600s there was a developed stylus that could draw a line with a specific width called a ruling pen. The stylus had two curved metal pieces, which were joined by a screw. Ink was trickled between the blades, from which it flowed evenly across the paper. The basic model was maintained for a long time, with minor modifications, until the 1930s when the German technical drawing pens came to the market. Many of the instruments were made by W H Harling, as indicated by the stamp. However, some of the instruments were made by J and W E Archbutt, Stanley and Elliot Brothers, suggesting that the case originally contained instruments from a variety of manufacturers or that Murdoch had replaced items over time.
    [Show full text]
  • Place Details
    Australian Heritage Database Page 1 of 4 Place Details Send Feedback Parliament House Vista Extension - Portal Buildings, Anzac Pde, Parkes, ACT, Australia Photographs None List Commonwealth Heritage List Class Historic Legal Status Listed place (22/06/2004) Place ID 105474 Place File No 8/01/000/0497 Summary Statement of Significance The Portal Buildings are important for their association with the push to transfer public servants from Melbourne to Canberra in the 1960s under the Liberal Government of Sir Robert Menzies. They are also important for their association with the consultancy of Sir William Holford and the views of the Senate Select Committee, which saw Canberra as a unified city in which background buildings in a monumental style functioned both as symbols of government and Australian unity. In this respect the Portal buildings are an expresssion of the National Capital Development Commission (NCDC) which adopted the views of Holford and the Senate, and interpreted them in terms of the formal composition of Walter Burley Griffin's plan for Canberra, with its cumulative massing, axiality and avenues. (Criterion A.4 and criterion H.1) (Themes: 4.2 Supplying urban services, 5.4 Working in offices, 7.5 Developing administrative structures and authorities) As symbols of government, the monumental Portal Buildings are located on Walter Burley Griffin's land axis, Anzac Parade, and the municipal axis, Consitution Avenue, which defines the northern side of the Parliamentary Triangle area in the heart of Canberra, and frame the Parliamentary vista at its transition from land to lake. The Portal Buildings exhibit a monumental character through strongly modelled structural bays, emphasised by the vertical emphasis of the columns and the use of sandstone cladding to the structural elements of the elevations, and are important elements of Civic Design in the urban setting of Canberra.
    [Show full text]
  • AUSTRALIAN ROMANESQUE a History of Romanesque-Inspired Architecture in Australia by John W. East 2016
    AUSTRALIAN ROMANESQUE A History of Romanesque-Inspired Architecture in Australia by John W. East 2016 CONTENTS 1. Introduction . 1 2. The Romanesque Style . 4 3. Australian Romanesque: An Overview . 25 4. New South Wales and the Australian Capital Territory . 52 5. Victoria . 92 6. Queensland . 122 7. Western Australia . 138 8. South Australia . 156 9. Tasmania . 170 Chapter 1: Introduction In Australia there are four Catholic cathedrals designed in the Romanesque style (Canberra, Newcastle, Port Pirie and Geraldton) and one Anglican cathedral (Parramatta). These buildings are significant in their local communities, but the numbers of people who visit them each year are minuscule when compared with the numbers visiting Australia's most famous Romanesque building, the large Sydney retail complex known as the Queen Victoria Building. God and Mammon, and the Romanesque serves them both. Do those who come to pray in the cathedrals, and those who come to shop in the galleries of the QVB, take much notice of the architecture? Probably not, and yet the Romanesque is a style of considerable character, with a history stretching back to Antiquity. It was never extensively used in Australia, but there are nonetheless hundreds of buildings in the Romanesque style still standing in Australia's towns and cities. Perhaps it is time to start looking more closely at these buildings? They will not disappoint. The heyday of the Australian Romanesque occurred in the fifty years between 1890 and 1940, and it was largely a brick-based style. As it happens, those years also marked the zenith of craft brickwork in Australia, because it was only in the late nineteenth century that Australia began to produce high-quality, durable bricks in a wide range of colours.
    [Show full text]
  • Heritage Management Plan 2015–2020 A
    Old Parliament House and Curtilage Heritage Management Plan 2015–2020 A OLD PARLIAMENT HOUSE AND CURTILAGE HERITAGE MANAGEMENT PLAN 2015–2020 I Acknowledgements This Old Parliament House and Curtilage Heritage Management Plan 2015-2020 is based heavily on the previous version; please see a copy of Version 1.0 (2008-2013) for a full list of original contributors. This Old Parliament House and Curtilage Heritage Management Plan 2015-2020 (Version 2.0) is the result of a review, including public consultation, and update by Old Parliament House staff. For further information or enquiries regarding this plan please contact: Deputy Director, Business Operations & Heritage Old Parliament House King George Terrace, Parkes ACT 2600 www.moadoph.gov.au Old Parliament House is an agency of the Australian Government © Commonwealth of Australia 2015 ISBN 0 642 75366 0 Old Parliament House and Curtilage Heritage Management Plan Version 1.0: Old Parliament House and Curtilage Heritage Management Plan 2008-2013; published 2008 Version 2.0: Old Parliament House and Curtilage Heritage Management Plan 2015-2020; published 2015 Maps by Hannah Gason Design and layout by giraffe.com.au Printed by New Millennium Print Old Parliament House and Curtilage Heritage Management Plan 2015–2020 A Director’s foreword We are shaping a fresh role for the Museum of Australian Democracy at Old Parliament House as a new kind of town square for Canberra and the nation. During Canberra’s early years, Old Parliament House was the social, geographic and political heart of the new Australian capital. In its heyday, the building was like a town within the city of Canberra: it had its own library, post office, barber, carpentry workshop, bars and dining room.
    [Show full text]