DOCSLIB.ORG

Heritage Management Plan 2015–2020 A

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Heritage Management Plan 2015–2020 A Old Parliament House and Curtilage Heritage Management Plan 2015–2020 A OLD PARLIAMENT HOUSE AND CURTILAGE HERITAGE MANAGEMENT PLAN 2015–2020 I Acknowledgements This Old Parliament House and Curtilage Heritage Management Plan 2015-2020 is based heavily on the previous version; please see a copy of Version 1.0 (2008-2013) for a full list of original contributors. This Old Parliament House and Curtilage Heritage Management Plan 2015-2020 (Version 2.0) is the result of a review, including public consultation, and update by Old Parliament House staff. For further information or enquiries regarding this plan please contact: Deputy Director, Business Operations & Heritage Old Parliament House King George Terrace, Parkes ACT 2600 www.moadoph.gov.au Old Parliament House is an agency of the Australian Government © Commonwealth of Australia 2015 ISBN 0 642 75366 0 Old Parliament House and Curtilage Heritage Management Plan Version 1.0: Old Parliament House and Curtilage Heritage Management Plan 2008-2013; published 2008 Version 2.0: Old Parliament House and Curtilage Heritage Management Plan 2015-2020; published 2015 Maps by Hannah Gason Design and layout by giraffe.com.au Printed by New Millennium Print Old Parliament House and Curtilage Heritage Management Plan 2015–2020 A Director’s foreword We are shaping a fresh role for the Museum of Australian Democracy at Old Parliament House as a new kind of town square for Canberra and the nation. During Canberra’s early years, Old Parliament House was the social, geographic and political heart of the new Australian capital. In its heyday, the building was like a town within the city of Canberra: it had its own library, post office, barber, carpentry workshop, bars and dining room. By the 1980s, thousands of people worked in the building including politicians, parliamentary staff, Hansard reporters, journalists, dining room and bar staff. Since Parliament moved to its new and permanent home, an active and award-winning program to conserve the heritage fabric of the National Heritage Listed building has been undertaken, alongside the launch of dynamic exhibition galleries and unique learning programs for schools. Today, through the lens of living democracy, we are working to build a vibrant community and attract new audiences through an active program of exhibitions, events, partnerships and online engagement. The Old Parliament House and Curtilage Heritage Management Plan 2015-2020 is a key expression of this vision, and our ongoing commitment to achieve progress in harmony with heritage values which recognise, preserve and communicate the spirit of place and support the broader mission. I commend the staff and stakeholders who have generously contributed to important and timely update of the Heritage Management Plan. Daryl Karp III A Old Parliament House and Curtilage Heritage Management Plan 2015–2020 CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS II DIRECTOR’S FOREWORD III EXECUTIVE SUMMARY VIII DESCRIPTION OF THE PLAN IX HOW TO USE THIS PLAN X PART A – CONTEXT 1. INTRODUCTION 1 PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF PLAN 1 CORE PRINCIPLES 2 KEY OUTCOMES 2 2. DESCRIPTION 4 LOCATION 4 PHYSICAL 7 SUMMARY HISTORY 8 3. HERITAGE VALUES 10 METHOD OF ASSESSMENT 10 SUMMARY STATEMENT OF HERITAGE SIGNIFICANCE 10 TABLE OF VALUES AND ATTRIBUTES 12 MAPPED VALUES 21 RISK ANALYSIS 38 SUMMARY CONDITION 40 4. MANAGEMENT FRAMEWORK 41 BACKGROUND 41 AUSTRALIAN LEGISLATION 41 CODES AND GUIDELINES 42 OLD PARLIAMENT HOUSE 42 NATIONAL CAPITAL AUTHORITY AND NATIONAL CAPITAL PLAN 43 COMMUNITY 43 USE PLAN 43 IV Old Parliament House and Curtilage Heritage Management Plan 2015–2020 A PART B – MANAGEMENT 5. POLICIES 47 BACKGROUND 47 1 CONSERVATION 48 2 MANAGEMENT APPROACH 56 3 DOCUMENTATION AND MONITORING 59 4 COMMUNICATION AND INTERPRETATION 60 5 EXISTING AND FUTURE USES 63 6 ACCESS, SECURITY, PLANT AND SERVICES 65 7 ACQUISITIONS, DISPOSALS AND LEASING 67 8 ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT 68 6. ZONES 69 BACKGROUND 69 LANDMARK ZONE 70 CHAMBERS ZONE 72 POLITICS AND PARTY ZONE 74 HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES AND SENATE WING ZONE 76 ANCILLARY FUNCTIONS ZONE 78 MOVABLE HERITAGE ZONE 80 7. IMPLEMENTATION AND REVIEW 81 ACTION PROPOSAL PROCESS SUMMARY 81 PERMITTED ACTION SCHEDULE 83 THE HERITAGE MANAGEMENT PLAN DESKTOP INTERACTIVE 83 IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 84 MONITORING 84 REVIEW 84 PART C – IMPLEMENTATION TOOLS 8. ACTION PROPOSAL PROCESS 85 BACKGROUND 85 HOW TO USE THE ACTION PROPOSAL PROCESS 85 ACTION PROPOSAL FORM 86 9. PERMITTED ACTION SCHEDULE 97 10. IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 129 V A Old Parliament House and Curtilage Heritage Management Plan 2015–20202008–2013 PART D – APPENDICES A. COMPLIANCE TABLES 133 B. NATIONAL AND COMMONWEALTH HERITAGE LIST CRITERIA 137 C. EXTRACTS FROM THE NATIONAL HERITAGE LISTING AND THE COMMONWEALTH HERITAGE LISTING 139 D. HISTORY OF THE PLACE 151 E. AUSTRALIA ICOMOS BURRA CHARTER 184 F. SUMMARY OF CONSULTATION PHASES 195 G. POLICY RATIONALES/COMMENTARIES 197 H. CONDITION OF VALUES – DETAILS AND METHODOLOGY 203 I. SOURCES OF INFORMATION 219 J. GLOSSARY 232 VI Old Parliament House and Curtilage Heritage Management Plan 2015–2020 A VII A Old Parliament House and Curtilage Heritage Management Plan 2015–20202008–2013 Executive summary On 20 June 2006, the Prime Minister, the Hon John This Heritage Management Plan satisfies Old Parliament Howard MP, announced the addition of Old Parliament House’s and the National Capital Authority’s obligations House and Curtilage to Australia’s National Heritage List. under the Environment Protection and Biodiversity The assessment of the heritage values demonstrated Conservation Act 1999 for Old Parliament House and that Old Parliament House and Curtilage had met Curtilage. Assisted by heritage consultants and an eight of the nine National Heritage List criteria. Old expert advisory panel, the original plan was written Parliament House and Curtilage had previously been by Old Parliament House staff for the Minister for included in the Commonwealth Heritage List in 2004 the Environment, Water, Heritage and the Arts. and is a significant feature in the Commonwealth Heritage Listed Parliament House Vista. The assessment of heritage values and the Statement of Heritage Significance in this plan draw on research Old Parliament House was opened in 1927. It undertaken for previous management plans and was designed by John Smith Murdoch the first heritage analyses. The heritage values tables are drawn Commonwealth Government architect, as the first from the National and Commonwealth Heritage Listings. purpose built home of Australia’s federal parliament. The plan provides a management and administrative It is one of the foundation government buildings framework ensuring all the heritage values are identified, from the early development of the national capital well managed, interpreted and made available for under the Griffin Plan. Old Parliament House is a community appreciation and enjoyment. It acts as substantial building containing some 500 rooms; a companion to Old Parliament House managers including formal Parliamentary Chambers with and staff for daily use, underpinning and informing associated executive offices, Parliamentarians’ rooms management decisions. Through zones, which and functional support spaces. Its National and support the policies, the plan provides a framework for Commonwealth heritage values are expressed in a assessment and approval of proposed uses or actions complex overlay and are manifested in the fabric, against the heritage values. This ensures effective use collections, history and intangible associations. and appropriate actions that protect and interpret the heritage values. This framework also provides Old Parliament House is a Commonwealth owned opportunities for ongoing community involvement. property. From July 1996 to November 2007 it was administered by the Department of Communications, Under the plan there will be ongoing monitoring, Information Technology and the Arts, from November reporting, and where appropriate or necessary, 2007 to June 2008 it was administered by the improvement of the condition of the listed heritage Department of the Environment, Water, Heritage and values of Old Parliament House and Curtilage. the Arts. From July 2008 Old Parliament House is an Executive Agency; the curtilage area is administered by During the life of this plan there will be an increase the National Capital Authority. Old Parliament House and in conservation, interpretation, exhibitions, learning, Curtilage is a heritage site and museum with a primary political scholarship and outreach programs focus to provide the Museum of Australian Democracy. associated with the place and the strategic vision The heritage values of the site and museum strategic for the Museum of Australian Democracy. vision are expressed through an array of interpretation, This plan will remain in place for five years and exhibition, online, learning, research, and commercial will be reviewed and updated as required. activities and events available to the public 364 days a year. The place is also home to the Australian Prime Ministers Centre in the House of Representatives Wing. VIII Old Parliament House and Curtilage Heritage Management Plan 2015–2020 A Description of the plan The content and decision making tool developed for this Heritage Management Plan is a response to a variety of influences; these are outlined in Figure 1. Figure 1: Outline of the plan MOAD@OPH STRATEGIC VISION STATUTORY REQUIREMENTS HERITAGE SECTOR STANDARDS BOLD EPBC Act stipulates the protection Australia ICOMOS Burra Charter – – Catalyst
Load more

Recommended publications
  • John Gorton Building and Former Communications Centre
    Register of Significant Architecture RSTCA No: R085 Name of Place: John Gorton Building and former Communications Centre Other/Former Names: Administrative Building, Parkes Address/Location: Parkes Place, corner of King Edward Terrace, Parkes, ACT Block 1 Section 35 of Parkes Listing Status: Registered Other Heritage Listings: CHL, RNE, Part of Parliamentary Vista. Date of Listing: 15 December 1994 Level of Significance: Regional Citation Revision No: 2 Category: Government Citation Revision Date: 1 March 2017 Style: Stripped Classical Dates of Design: 1924, 1946, 1974 Designers: G Sydney Jones/Robertson & Marks, Dept of Interior, Dept of Works & Housing Construction Period: 1947-1956, 1977 Client/Owner/Lessee: Commonwealth of Australia Date of Addition: 1977 Builder: 1947 Concrete Constructions of Sydney STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE The John Gorton Building resulted from the winning Academic Classical style design in a 1924 Federal Capital Advisory Committee architectural competition for an administrative building. Only the siting and general layout of that design were followed when the building was redesigned in 1946 in the Inter-War Stripped Classical style and completed in 1956. It is a rare large-scale example of a public office building in that style. Key indicators of the style displayed in the building include: symmetrical facades; divisions into vertical bays indicating classical origins; vestigial classical columns; simple surfaces and spandrels between storeys subdued to emphasize verticality. Good use of light wells allows internal office areas to be well lit by daylight. Design elements which retain a high level of integrity are the exterior, foyer, lift lobbies and central corridors. The former underground Communications Centre, added in 1977, is a unique windowless secure environment for Government activities, with design elements, particularly in the foyer, evocative of the period – a mural, luminous ceilings, bright chrome pillars, curved walls, wall hangings by artist/weavers and plant containers.
    [Show full text]
  • Heritage Management Plan Final Report
    Australian War Memorial Heritage Management Plan Final Report Prepared by Godden Mackay Logan Heritage Consultants for the Australian War Memorial January 2011 Report Register The following report register documents the development and issue of the report entitled Australian War Memorial—Heritage Management Plan, undertaken by Godden Mackay Logan Pty Ltd in accordance with its quality management system. Godden Mackay Logan operates under a quality management system which has been certified as complying with the Australian/New Zealand Standard for quality management systems AS/NZS ISO 9001:2008. Job No. Issue No. Notes/Description Issue Date 06-0420 1 Draft Report July 2008 06-0420 2 Second Draft Report August 2008 06-0420 3 Third Draft Report September 2008 06-0420 4 Fourth Draft Report April 2009 06-0420 5 Final Draft Report (for public comment) September 2009 06-0420 6 Final Report January 2011 Contents Page Glossary of Terms Abbreviations Conservation Terms Sources Executive Summary......................................................................................................................................i How To Use This Report .............................................................................................................................v 1.0 Introduction............................................................................................................................................1 1.1 Background..........................................................................................................................................1
    [Show full text]
  • Spring Newsletter 2016
    Newsletter 2016 Spring Don’t forget! National Recycling Week 7–13 November Come and visit us at Garema place on 11 November. Materials Recovery Facility Tour Wednesday 9 November – 11:30am and 1pm Come along and discover what happens to the recycling from your workplace. RSVP to [email protected] Actsmart Accredited Cleaners Workshop Business Sustainability Expo Is your cleaner Actsmart accredited? Visit the website for more information. After a huge day of seminars, education and networking, the actsmart.act.gov.au Business Sustainability Expo is done and dusted for another year. Dorte’s message Held at a new venue, the Expo featured 45 stallholders and a Welcome to the 2016 spring 30% increase in attendees – our most successful event to date! edition of the Actsmart Industry professionals from around Australia flocked to Business newsletter. Canberra to show off new products and technologies. The This edition highlights Actsmart’s Lighting Efficiency webtool was also launched. This free events and ongoing achievements. tool provides advice about improving the lighting efficiency The annual Business Sustainability of your business. Check out the Actsmart website for more Expo was held in early September at the National Convention Centre information. with 45 great exhibitors. Information and solutions to Lish Fejer from 666 ABC Canberra hosted the main stage improve waste management and assist with energy and and interviewed stallholders throughout the day. She also sat water savings were on display for all. down for a chat with our special guest, Barry Du Bois from Complementing the Expo, the Actsmart for Change Ten Network’s The Living Room.
    [Show full text]
  • Determining the Effectiveness of Vegetation Management Programs Measures and Methodologies - Literature Review
    Determining the Effectiveness of Vegetation Management Programs Measures and Methodologies - Literature Review RIRDC/LWRRDC/FWPRDC Joint Venture Agroforestry Program (supported by the Natural Heritage Trust and the Murray Darling Basin Commission) and Environment Australia RIRDC Publication No 99/130 RIRDC Project No MS967-43 © 2000 Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation. All rights reserved. ISBN 0 642 57936 9 ISSN 1440-6845 Determining the Effectiveness of Vegetation Management Programs – Measures and Methodologies Publication no 99/130 Project no. MS967-43 The views expressed and the conclusions reached in this publication are those of the authors and not necessarily those of persons consulted. RIRDC shall not be responsible in any way whatsoever to any person who relies in whole or in part on the contents of this report. This publication is copyright. However, RIRDC encourages wide dissemination of its research, providing the Corporation is clearly acknowledged. For any other enquiries concerning reproduction, contact the Publications Manager on phone 02 6272 3186. Researcher Contact Details Centre for International Economics CSIRO GPO Box 2203 Division of Wildlife and Ecology Canberra ACT 2601 Gungahlin Homestead Barton highway Phone: 02 6248 6699 CRACE ACT 2911 Fax: 02 6247 7484 GPO Box 284 Email: [email protected] CANBERRA CITY ACT 2601 Phone: 02 6242 1600 Website: http://www.csiro.au/index.asp RIRDC Contact Details Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation Level 1, AMA House 42 Macquarie Street BARTON
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction
    1 Introduction The Parliamentary Zone “The Parliamentary Zone will be given meaning as the Place of the People, accessible to all Australians so that they can more fully understand and appreciate the collective experience and rich diversity of this country.” – National Capital Plan. 1.1 Walter Burley Griffin’s plan for Canberra was designed to reflect the values of an emerging nation1 and includes that which has come to be known as the National Triangle. The southern apex of the triangle, known as the Parliamentary Zone, is described in the National Capital Plan as “the physical manifestation of Australian democratic government and home of the nation's most important cultural and judicial institutions and symbols”.2 The institutions within the Zone represent the Australian people, their values and achievements.3 In general terms, the Parliamentary Zone includes the Parliament House site within Capital Circle and extends to the land lying east of Commonwealth Avenue and west of Kings Avenue to Lake Burley Griffin, and the land south of Lake Burley Griffin lying between the two avenues. 1 National Capital Authority, Consolidated National Capital Plan, February 2002, p 285. 2 National Capital Authority, Consolidated National Capital Plan, February 2002, p 29. 3 John Lauder, Submissions, p 132. 2 1.2 The Parliamentary Zone covers a total area of 1,081,048 square metres, approximately 14 per cent of which is taken up by surface parking and 5.6 per cent of which is taken up by buildings. These buildings include the national institutions which consist of Reconciliation Place, Commonwealth Place, the National Gallery of Australia, the High Court of Australia, the National Science and Technology Centre, Old Parliament House and the National Portrait Gallery, the National Library of Australia and the National Archives of Australia4.
    [Show full text]
  • Public Environmental Report
    Darwin 10 MTPA LNG Facility Public Environmental Report March 2002 Darwin 10 MTPA LNG Facility Public Environmental Report March 2002 Prepared for Phillips Petroleum Company Australia Pty Ltd Level 1, HPPL House 28-42 Ventnor Avenue West Perth WA 6005 Australia by URS Australia Pty Ltd Level 3, Hyatt Centre 20 Terrace Road East Perth WA 6004 Australia 12 March 2002 Reference: 00533-244-562 / R841 / PER Darwin LNG Plant Phillips Petroleum Company Australia Pty Ltd ABN 86 092 288 376 Public Environmental Report PUBLIC COMMENT INVITED Phillips Petroleum Company Australia Pty Ltd, a subsidiary of Phillips Petroleum Company, proposes the construction and operation of an expanded two-train Liquefied Natural Gas facility with a maximum design capacity of 10 million tonnes per annum (MTPA). The facility will be located at Wickham Point on the Middle Arm Peninsula adjacent to Darwin Harbour near Darwin, NT. The proposed project will include gas liquefication, storage and marine loading facilities and a dedicated fleet of ships to transport LNG product. A subsea pipeline supplying natural gas from the Bayu-Undan field to Wickham Point and a similar, but smaller 3 MTPA LNG plant were the subject of a detailed Environmental Impact Assessment process and received approval from Commonwealth and Northern Territory Environment Ministers during 1998. The environmental assessment of the expanded LNG facility is being conducted at the Public Environmental Report (PER) level of the Northern Territory Environmental Assessment Act and the Commonwealth Environmental Protection (Impact of Proposals) Act. The draft PER describes the expanded LNG facility with particular emphasis on its differences from the previously approved LNG facility and addresses the potential environmental impacts and mitigation measures associated with the project.
    [Show full text]
  • Using Parliamentary Materials in Interpretation: Insights from Parliamentary Process
    4 UNSW Law Journal Volume 41(1) 2 USING PARLIAMENTARY MATERIALS IN INTERPRETATION: INSIGHTS FROM PARLIAMENTARY PROCESS JACINTA DHARMANANDA* It is orthodoxy in Australia that when interpreting statutory text, attention turns to the words ‘in context’. This context is taken to include extrinsic context, including extrinsic materials. Parliamentary materials represent a significant category of such extrinsic matter. These are materials produced as part of the enactment of the statute in Parliament, such as second reading speeches, explanatory memoranda, and committee reports. But although readers of statutes regularly refer to parliamentary materials and attribute weight to them for the interpretative task, most readers know little about them. This article examines parliamentary materials for federal legislation. The aim of this examination is to highlight factors that may be considered when assessing such materials as interpretative aids. The article reflects preliminary research done as part of a wider research project on the relationship between the legislative process and statutory interpretation. I INTRODUCTION The process of making statutes and the task of interpreting statutes are more often than not considered in isolation. This perhaps is a reflection of the importance that the separation of powers doctrine is given in Australia. One of the consequences is that the laws and principles that govern statutory interpretation make many assumptions about how the legislative process works.1 Some years ago, the well-known statutory interpretation scholar, Francis Bennion, said that ‘[t]he nature of an Act as the product of a complex democratic * Assistant Professor, Law School, University of Western Australia, and PhD Candidate, College of Law, Australian National University.
    [Show full text]
  • Periodic Report
    australian heritage council Periodic Report march 2004 – february 2007 australian heritage council Periodic Report march 2004 – february 2007 Published by the Australian Government Department of the Environment and Water Resources ISBN: 9780642553513 © Commonwealth of Australia 2007 This work is copyright. Apart from any use as permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, no part may be reproduced by any process without prior written permission from the Commonwealth. Requests and inquiries concerning reproduction and rights should be addressed to the Commonwealth Copyright Administration, Attorney General’s Department, Robert Garran Offices, National Circuit, Barton ACT 2600 or posted at http://www.ag.gov.au/cca Cover images: (left to right): Royal National Park, Ned Kelly’s armour, Old Parliament House, Port Arthur, Nourlangie rock art. © Department of the Environment and Water Resources (and associated photographers). Printed by Union Offset Printers Designed and typeset by Fusebox Design 2 australian heritage council – periodic report The Hon Malcolm Turnbull MP Minister for the Environment and Water Resources Parliament House CANBERRA ACT 2600 Dear Minister Australian Heritage Council: Periodic Report On 19 February, 2004 the Minister for the Environment and Heritage appointed the Australian Heritage Council (the Council) to act as his principal adviser on heritage matters with roles and responsibilities laid out in the Australian Heritage Council Act 2003 (the AHC Act). Under Section 24A of the AHC Act, Council may prepare a report on any matter related to its functions and provide the report to the Minister for laying before each House of the Parliament within 15 sitting days after the day on which the Minister receives the report.
    [Show full text]
  • Selected Australian Political Records
    RESEARCH PAPER SERIES, 2013–14 UPDATED 5 MARCH 2014 Selected political records of the Commonwealth Parliament Martin Lumb and Rob Lundie Politics and Public Administration Contents Introduction ................................................................................................ 6 Governor-General ....................................................................................... 6 First Governor-General..................................................................................... 6 First Australian-born Governor-General .......................................................... 6 Prime Ministers ........................................................................................... 6 First Prime Minister .......................................................................................... 6 First Leader of the Opposition .......................................................................... 6 Youngest person to become Prime Minister .................................................... 6 Oldest person to become Prime Minister ........................................................ 6 Longest serving Prime Minister ........................................................................ 6 Shortest serving Prime Minister ....................................................................... 6 Oldest serving Prime Minister .......................................................................... 6 Prime Ministers who served separate terms as Prime Minister ...................... 6 Prime Ministers who
    [Show full text]
  • The North-West Marine Bioregional Plan
    The North-west Marine Bioregional Plan North-west The The North-west Marine Bioregional Plan Bioregional Profile Bioregional Profile A Description of the Ecosystems, Conservation Values and Uses of the North-west Marine Region Photo credits: Front cover – Whale shark: Glen Cowans. Front insert – Lesser frigatebird: Tom and Marie Tarrant. Humpback whale: Mark Farrell. Olive seasnake: Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority. Back cover – Blowfish: Glen Cowans. Back insert – Trochus: Neil Gemmell, Department of the Environment, Water, Heritage and the Arts. Flatback turtle hatchling: Scott Laidlaw, Department of the Environment, Water, Heritage and the Arts. Manta ray: Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority. Inside cover – Grey reef shark: Paradise Ink. Copyright: © Commonwealth of Australia 2008 This work is copyright. Apart from any use as permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, no part may be reproduced by any process without prior written permission from the Commonwealth, available from the Department of the Environment, Water, Heritage and the Arts. Requests and inquiries concerning reproduction and rights should be addressed to: The Director Marine Bioregional Planning – North-west Marine and Biodiversity Division Edgar Waite Building Department of the Environment, Water, Heritage and the Arts 203 Channel Highway Kingston TAS 7050 Disclaimer: While reasonable efforts have been made to ensure that the contents of this publication are factually correct, the Commonwealth does not accept responsibility for the accuracy or completeness of the contents, and shall not be liable for any loss or damage that may be occasioned directly or indirectly through the use of, or reliance on, the contents of this publication. Sourcing: This publication can be viewed or downloaded in full or in sections from: <www.environment.gov.au/coasts/mbp/north-west>.
    [Show full text]
  • Senate Finance and Public Administration Legislation Committee ANSWERS to QUESTIONS on NOTICE ADDITIONAL ESTIMATES 2014-15 Finan
    Senate Finance and Public Administration Legislation Committee ANSWERS TO QUESTIONS ON NOTICE ADDITIONAL ESTIMATES 2014-15 Finance Portfolio Department/Agency: Department of Finance Outcome/Program: 2/2.2 Topic: Scoping study into buildings in the Parliamentary Triangle Senator: Wong Question reference number: F90 Type of question: Written Date set by the committee for the return of answer: Friday, 10 April 2015 Number of pages: 3 Question: 1. I refer to the announcement on 13 February 2015 that the Government is undertaking a scoping study into the divestment options of buildings in the Parliamentary Triangle. 2. How many staff members are involved with this? Has the Department hired additional staff or contractors to conduct this work (aside from the Pricewaterhouse Coopers and Ashurst adviser staff)? If so can the Department provide details of them please – APS level or SES classifications, part-time/full-time, etc. 3. Who are the current tenants of the John Gorton and Treasury buildings, East and West Block, and Anzac Park East and West? 4. Can the Department describe the current arrangements for these buildings – the Commonwealth owns all these buildings, and tenants pay lease costs? Do the lease costs go back to Finance? 5. Can the Department provide the lease costs for all the tenants of these six buildings? When do these leases expire? 6. Given there are the ongoing works in relation to the John Gorton Building – can the Department provide details of the ongoing maintenance and refurbishment requirements and costs for the other five buildings? 7. Is the Department aware of any restrictions on the use of these buildings based on any heritage requirements? 8.
    [Show full text]
  • Dr Jane Lennon AM
    Submission No. 15 The Secretary Joint Standing Committee on the National Capital and External Territories Parliament House Canberra ACT 2600 Re: Inquiry into the administration of the National Memorials Ordinance 1928, the building of memorials of national significance in Canberra. I would like to comment on the issues raised in the terms of reference for your Inquiry. As a preamble however, I’m appalled at the failure of process that has let the current war memorials proposal for Rond Terrace on the north shore of Lake Burley Griffin get to this stage of absurdity when most Australians believe that the Australian War Memorial, one of the early entries on the National Heritage List, is the centre of our national commemoration for all Australian who have served in wars and this is attested to by its continuing high visitation. Australian citizens have since 1974 expected that the Australian Heritage Commission and its successor, the Australian Heritage Council, through their legislative powers would advise government on the protection of the heritage values of places, often the people’s public places. But in this case this has not occurred from my reading of the press reports, and indeed it highlights how the NCA had become a law unto itself seeking to ‘activate’ the foreshores of Lake Burley Griffin by inappropriate developments aimed at increasing tourism. However, the listing of the Parliamentary Vista is only on the Commonwealth Heritage List [see Appendix 1 for its statement of heritage values and cultural significance] rather than the Minister having to exercise the heritage processes of the relevant sections of the EPBC Act as with NHL places.
    [Show full text]