DOCSLIB.ORG

Dr Jane Lennon AM

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Dr Jane Lennon AM Submission No. 15 The Secretary Joint Standing Committee on the National Capital and External Territories Parliament House Canberra ACT 2600 Re: Inquiry into the administration of the National Memorials Ordinance 1928, the building of memorials of national significance in Canberra. I would like to comment on the issues raised in the terms of reference for your Inquiry. As a preamble however, I’m appalled at the failure of process that has let the current war memorials proposal for Rond Terrace on the north shore of Lake Burley Griffin get to this stage of absurdity when most Australians believe that the Australian War Memorial, one of the early entries on the National Heritage List, is the centre of our national commemoration for all Australian who have served in wars and this is attested to by its continuing high visitation. Australian citizens have since 1974 expected that the Australian Heritage Commission and its successor, the Australian Heritage Council, through their legislative powers would advise government on the protection of the heritage values of places, often the people’s public places. But in this case this has not occurred from my reading of the press reports, and indeed it highlights how the NCA had become a law unto itself seeking to ‘activate’ the foreshores of Lake Burley Griffin by inappropriate developments aimed at increasing tourism. However, the listing of the Parliamentary Vista is only on the Commonwealth Heritage List [see Appendix 1 for its statement of heritage values and cultural significance] rather than the Minister having to exercise the heritage processes of the relevant sections of the EPBC Act as with NHL places. In addition, the tenure of Commonwealth and designated lands within the Parliamentary Triangle has been a vexed and long running issue that would have been dealt with long ago in most local government situations, but, as this is a matter of power for certain members of Parliament and /or appointed non-elected committees, it has been tip toed around and slid under the radar of public comment. There have been ‘contests’ previously over the Aboriginal Tent Embassy, the Centenary of Women’s Suffrage memorial, the redevelopment of the forecourt area to the National Library, Reconciliation Place to name a few such issues in the Parliamentary Vista. This current proposal developed over several years by the National Capital Authority with total disregard for the conservation of the heritage listed places in the area demonstrates serious failure in the administration of the National Memorials Ordinance 1928. Fortunately, this Inquiry provides an opportunity for ensuring that proper regard is given to heritage conservation from the outset of any proposal for a memorial, and to stop the current proposal from being constructed as it is out of scale and wrongly located. Therefore it is timely to address the range of issues behind the current fiasco and bring decision making into the national gaze through open and well publicised consultation notices/discussion papers. The membership of the Canberra National Memorials Committee (CNMC): This committee should have relevant experts –national heritage expert, social historian, landscape architect/designer, urban planner and representatives of both major political parties in the Australian Parliament and a representative of the ACT government given the local population resident in the national capital. There are expert heritage associations such as Australia ICOMOS and membership organisations such as the National Trust and Australian Garden History Society who could supply excellent nominees experienced in heritage conservation and cultural landscapes in particular. The process for decision-making by the CNMC: Given the title of this committee, it should be controlled by the national parliament delegated to one of its agencies to act as secretariat such as the one responsible for national heritage who would then make a statutory report back to parliament outlining the views of experts, local citizens and the wider Australian public about the memorial issue being debated. The charter of the CNMC should require that it acknowledges primacy of heritage values and then it follows that there be proper regard be given from the outset to heritage impacts of any proposed memorial in heritage listed places and the fact that the Committee is creating or adding to the stock of national heritage. Mechanisms for the CNMC to seek independent, expert advice: Proposals for a monument to be erected on a heritage place must be accompanied by advice from an independent heritage expert as to the impact of the proposal on the heritage values of the place. The expert should be chosen at random from a panel of experts accredited by the Committee. Where the heritage place is a significant cultural landscape the expert must have appropriate skills and experience in that area, i.e. not just any architect or historian. Opportunities for improving transparency in the administration of the Ordinance: Any proposals should be advertised in the public media with provision for public comments like any development application under standard town planning regulations. The results of these consultations on siting, design, use and maintenance should then be made available publicly. The decisions of the Committee to approve any memorial should be published with reasons, and subject to appeal by any interested party under the ADJR Act. The appropriate level of parliamentary oversight for proposed National Memorials: Parliamentary oversight should include the Minister responsible for heritage, to ensure that the heritage values of national importance are protected and conserved. The designed landscapes of cultural heritage significance in Canberra are part of Australia’s heritage and must be conserved, the Griffin legacy. The appropriate level of public participation in the development of proposed National Memorials: Public participation should be achieved by nominations from public organisations for membership of the Canberra National Memorials Committee and by providing opportunities for public participation in the decision making process as outlined above for a more transparent process. If changes to the current arrangements are recommended, inquire into and report on transition provisions for current provisions for current proposals for memorials which have not yet been constructed: Any memorials currently proposed should not be constructed, and the Joint Standing Committee should so recommend. This Committee should also recommend that no memorials be constructed without regard for the Walter Burley Griffin landscape design, a masterwork which is part of our national heritage and often regarded as a contender for World Heritage. The question as to whether the proposed World War 1 and World War II memorials should be constructed at some other location should be subject to a public inquiry. However, as stated at the beginning of this submission, the Australian War Memorial should be the centre of commemoration in the national capital and receive proper funding and support which it has not had in recent years as reported in the press. In addition, nearly every Australian town has a war memorial and these should be regarded as the distributed national collection and subject to maintenance grants. In Queensland the Minister for Public Works had such a grant fund as these memorials were much loved and often in towns without a viable population to look after them. Conservation led to increased interest in their history and a civic pride. Australia does not need another set of new memorials as commemorative panels or names can be added to existing town memorials as is occurring even for Afghanistan veterans; nor do we need a military cemetery managed by the Department of Veteran Affairs along the lines of the American central one at Arlington as has been suggested In addition, privately funded memorials proposals (like the lakeside war memorials) should have a limited time in which to raise money before government-allocated sites are withdrawn. This would test the level of support from the general Australian public. In conclusion, while war memorials commemorate the dead, they also perpetuate the people who build them and whose names also appear on them. This has a downside when it also involves the incremental despoiling of our national capital by officials and appointees making unsound decisions to progress the misconceived agendas of non-elected interest groups without reference to the heritage landscape legacy; the result is a plague of plaques in the landscape. Yours sincerely Dr Jane Lennon AM Appendix 1: Australian Heritage Database entry for Parliament House Vista, Anzac Pde, Parkes, ACT , Australia Photographs List Commonwealth Heritage List Class Historic Legal Status Listed place (22/06/2004) Place ID 105466 Place File No 8/01/000/0075 Summary Statement of Significance Design Importance The Parliament House Vista is the central designed landscape of Canberra, that expresses the core of the Walter Burley Griffin design vision for Canberra. It is highly significant for its symbolic representation of the democratic interchange between the people and their elected representatives and its use of the natural landforms to generate a strong planning geometry. It expresses a masterly synthesis and ordering of topographical features and administrative functions to meet the needs of a national capital. The vista landscape embraces the central land axis and part of the water axis and
Load more

Recommended publications
  • John Gorton Building and Former Communications Centre
    Register of Significant Architecture RSTCA No: R085 Name of Place: John Gorton Building and former Communications Centre Other/Former Names: Administrative Building, Parkes Address/Location: Parkes Place, corner of King Edward Terrace, Parkes, ACT Block 1 Section 35 of Parkes Listing Status: Registered Other Heritage Listings: CHL, RNE, Part of Parliamentary Vista. Date of Listing: 15 December 1994 Level of Significance: Regional Citation Revision No: 2 Category: Government Citation Revision Date: 1 March 2017 Style: Stripped Classical Dates of Design: 1924, 1946, 1974 Designers: G Sydney Jones/Robertson & Marks, Dept of Interior, Dept of Works & Housing Construction Period: 1947-1956, 1977 Client/Owner/Lessee: Commonwealth of Australia Date of Addition: 1977 Builder: 1947 Concrete Constructions of Sydney STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE The John Gorton Building resulted from the winning Academic Classical style design in a 1924 Federal Capital Advisory Committee architectural competition for an administrative building. Only the siting and general layout of that design were followed when the building was redesigned in 1946 in the Inter-War Stripped Classical style and completed in 1956. It is a rare large-scale example of a public office building in that style. Key indicators of the style displayed in the building include: symmetrical facades; divisions into vertical bays indicating classical origins; vestigial classical columns; simple surfaces and spandrels between storeys subdued to emphasize verticality. Good use of light wells allows internal office areas to be well lit by daylight. Design elements which retain a high level of integrity are the exterior, foyer, lift lobbies and central corridors. The former underground Communications Centre, added in 1977, is a unique windowless secure environment for Government activities, with design elements, particularly in the foyer, evocative of the period – a mural, luminous ceilings, bright chrome pillars, curved walls, wall hangings by artist/weavers and plant containers.
    [Show full text]
  • The National Capital Canberra
    EXPLORING CIVICS AND CITIZENSHIP Through a visit to the national capital canberra UPPER PRIMARY Student Resource Book A classroom resource to support the Parliament and Civics Education Rebate (PACER) program EXPLORING CIVICS AND CITIZENSHIP Through a Visit to the National Capital, Canberra Upper Primary Student Resource Book A classroom resource to support the PACER program ISBN: 978-0-642-77926-7 (PDF) ISBN: 978-0-642-77927-4 (RTF) First published 2008 Second edition 2010 © 2010 This work is copyright. Permission is given by the Commonwealth for this booklet and CD-ROM to be copied without payment by educational institutions within Australia solely for educational purposes. Any other use will require written permission of the Department of Education, Employment and Workplace Relations (DEEWR) and may require the written permission of other copyright owners. Copies should include this copyright statement or an appropriate acknowledgement. All other rights are reserved. Apart from any use permitted above or under the Copyright Act 1968, no part of this booklet or CD-ROM may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, including electronic, digital, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without prior permission of DEEWR. To the best of DEEWR’s knowledge, copyright permission has been obtained for any non-Commonwealth material used in this booklet and for the use of such material for educational purposes. If you believe there has been an error or omission in any of the material, please contact DEEWR. For inquiries about reproduction or other uses of this publication, please contact the Department of Education, Employment and Workplace Relations at www.deewr.gov.au/.
    [Show full text]
  • Australian War Memorial
    Commonwealth of Australia Gazette No. S 64, Tuesday, 25 April 2006 SPECIAL Published by the Commonwealth of Australia Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 INCLUSION OF A PLACE IN THE NATIONAL HERITAGE LIST I, Ian Gordon Campbell, Minister for the Environment and Heritage, having considered, in relation to the place listed in the Schedule of this instrument - (a) the Australian Heritage Council’s assessment whether the place meets any of the National Heritage criteria; and (b) the comments given to the Council under section 324G of the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999; and being satisfied that the place specified in the Schedule has the National Heritage value or values specified in the Schedule include, pursuant to section 324J of the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999, the place listed in the Schedule in the National Heritage List. Dated 20 April 2006 [SIGNED] Ian Gordon Campbell Minister for the Environment and Heritage Cat. No. S6406 ISSN 1032-2345 © Commonwealth of Australia 2006 Commonwealth of Australia Gazette Commonwealth of Australia Gazette 2 Special Gazette No. S 64, 25 April 2006 No. S 64, 25 April 2006 Special Gazette 3 SCHEDULE STATE/TERRITORY Name: Location / Boundary Criteria / Values AUSTRALIAN CAPITAL TERRITORY Australian War Memorial and the Memorial Parade: About 25ha, in Reid and Campbell, comprising the whole of Anzac Parade (including the median strip) from the northern alignment of Constitution Avenue to the southern boundary of Section 39 Reid; Anzac Park (comprising Block 1 Section 41 Reid, Block 4 Section 39 Reid, Block 1 Section 1 Campbell, Block 2 Section 60 Campbell); the whole of Section 39 Campbell; that part of Limestone Avenue to the east of the alignment of the south-eastern most boundary of Block 5 Section 39 Reid; and that part of Fairbairn Avenue to the west of the alignment of the north west boundary of Block 3 Section 60 Campbell.
    [Show full text]
  • Heritage Management Plan Final Report
    Australian War Memorial Heritage Management Plan Final Report Prepared by Godden Mackay Logan Heritage Consultants for the Australian War Memorial January 2011 Report Register The following report register documents the development and issue of the report entitled Australian War Memorial—Heritage Management Plan, undertaken by Godden Mackay Logan Pty Ltd in accordance with its quality management system. Godden Mackay Logan operates under a quality management system which has been certified as complying with the Australian/New Zealand Standard for quality management systems AS/NZS ISO 9001:2008. Job No. Issue No. Notes/Description Issue Date 06-0420 1 Draft Report July 2008 06-0420 2 Second Draft Report August 2008 06-0420 3 Third Draft Report September 2008 06-0420 4 Fourth Draft Report April 2009 06-0420 5 Final Draft Report (for public comment) September 2009 06-0420 6 Final Report January 2011 Contents Page Glossary of Terms Abbreviations Conservation Terms Sources Executive Summary......................................................................................................................................i How To Use This Report .............................................................................................................................v 1.0 Introduction............................................................................................................................................1 1.1 Background..........................................................................................................................................1
    [Show full text]
  • Heritage Management Plan 2015–2020 A
    Old Parliament House and Curtilage Heritage Management Plan 2015–2020 A OLD PARLIAMENT HOUSE AND CURTILAGE HERITAGE MANAGEMENT PLAN 2015–2020 I Acknowledgements This Old Parliament House and Curtilage Heritage Management Plan 2015-2020 is based heavily on the previous version; please see a copy of Version 1.0 (2008-2013) for a full list of original contributors. This Old Parliament House and Curtilage Heritage Management Plan 2015-2020 (Version 2.0) is the result of a review, including public consultation, and update by Old Parliament House staff. For further information or enquiries regarding this plan please contact: Deputy Director, Business Operations & Heritage Old Parliament House King George Terrace, Parkes ACT 2600 www.moadoph.gov.au Old Parliament House is an agency of the Australian Government © Commonwealth of Australia 2015 ISBN 0 642 75366 0 Old Parliament House and Curtilage Heritage Management Plan Version 1.0: Old Parliament House and Curtilage Heritage Management Plan 2008-2013; published 2008 Version 2.0: Old Parliament House and Curtilage Heritage Management Plan 2015-2020; published 2015 Maps by Hannah Gason Design and layout by giraffe.com.au Printed by New Millennium Print Old Parliament House and Curtilage Heritage Management Plan 2015–2020 A Director’s foreword We are shaping a fresh role for the Museum of Australian Democracy at Old Parliament House as a new kind of town square for Canberra and the nation. During Canberra’s early years, Old Parliament House was the social, geographic and political heart of the new Australian capital. In its heyday, the building was like a town within the city of Canberra: it had its own library, post office, barber, carpentry workshop, bars and dining room.
    [Show full text]
  • Australian War Memorial Annual Report 2009-2010
    Australian War Memorial War Australian Annual Report 2009-2010 Annual Report Australian War Memorial Annual Report 2009-2010 Australian War Memorial Annual Report 2009–2010 Then Prime Minister of Australia, the Honourable The Council Chair walks with Governor-General Her Excellency Kevin Rudd MP, delivers the Address on ANZAC Ms Quentin Bryce through the Commemorative Area following Day 2010. the 2009 Remembrance Day ceremony. Australian War Memorial Annual Report 2009–2010 Annual report for the year ended 30 June 2010, together with the financial statements and the report of the Auditor-General Images produced courtesy of the Australian War Memorial, Canberra Cover image: New Eastern Precinct development at night (AWM PAIU2010/028.11) Back cover image: The sculpture of Sir Edward ‘Weary’ Dunlop overlooks the Terrace at the Memorial cafe (AWM PAIU2010/028.01) Copyright © Australian War Memorial ISSN 1441 4198 This work is copyright. Apart from any use as permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, no part may be reproduced, copied, scanned, stored in a retrieval system, recorded, or transmitted in any form or by any means without the prior written permission of the publisher. Australian War Memorial GPO Box 345 Canberra, ACT 2601 Australia www.awm.gov.au Australian War Memorial Annual Report 2009–2010 iii Australian War Memorial Annual Report 2009–2010 iv Australian War Memorial Annual Report 2009–2010 Introduction to the Report The Annual Report of the Australian War Memorial for the year ended 30 June 2010 follows the format for an Annual Report for a Commonwealth Authority in accordance with the Commonwealth Authorities and Companies (CAC) (Report of Operations) Orders 2005 under the CAC Act 1997.
    [Show full text]
  • Spring Newsletter 2016
    Newsletter 2016 Spring Don’t forget! National Recycling Week 7–13 November Come and visit us at Garema place on 11 November. Materials Recovery Facility Tour Wednesday 9 November – 11:30am and 1pm Come along and discover what happens to the recycling from your workplace. RSVP to [email protected] Actsmart Accredited Cleaners Workshop Business Sustainability Expo Is your cleaner Actsmart accredited? Visit the website for more information. After a huge day of seminars, education and networking, the actsmart.act.gov.au Business Sustainability Expo is done and dusted for another year. Dorte’s message Held at a new venue, the Expo featured 45 stallholders and a Welcome to the 2016 spring 30% increase in attendees – our most successful event to date! edition of the Actsmart Industry professionals from around Australia flocked to Business newsletter. Canberra to show off new products and technologies. The This edition highlights Actsmart’s Lighting Efficiency webtool was also launched. This free events and ongoing achievements. tool provides advice about improving the lighting efficiency The annual Business Sustainability of your business. Check out the Actsmart website for more Expo was held in early September at the National Convention Centre information. with 45 great exhibitors. Information and solutions to Lish Fejer from 666 ABC Canberra hosted the main stage improve waste management and assist with energy and and interviewed stallholders throughout the day. She also sat water savings were on display for all. down for a chat with our special guest, Barry Du Bois from Complementing the Expo, the Actsmart for Change Ten Network’s The Living Room.
    [Show full text]
  • Attachment A
    ATTACHMENT A Original Referral, October 2019 LIST OF ATTACHMENTS ATTACHMENT DESCRIPTION STATUS Submission, October 2019 Included A Action Area Location Plan Included B Action Area Site Plan and Disturbance Areas Included C Indigenous Consultation Summary (Redacted) Superseded by ATTACHMENT S of the Final Preliminary Documentation September 2020 Resubmission D Stakeholder Engagement and Consultation Report Superseded by ATTACHMENT S of the Final Preliminary Documentation September 2020 Resubmission E AWM Redevelopment HIA Superseded by ATTACHMENT D of the Final Preliminary Documentation September 2020 Resubmission F Mitigation Measures Included G ACT Standard Construction Environmental Management Plan Included H Energy and Environmental Policy, May 2019 Included I National Collection Environmental Management Plan Included (NCEMP) EPBC Act referral Note: PDF may contain fields not relevant to your application. These fields will appear blank or unticked. Please disregard these fields. Title of proposal 2019/8574 - Australian War Memorial Redevelopment Section 1 Summary of your proposed action 1.1 Project industry type Commonwealth 1.2 Provide a detailed description of the proposed action, including all proposed activities Overview The proposed action is the redevelopment of the Australian War Memorial (the Memorial), specifically the Southern Entrance, Parade Ground Anzac Hall and new glazed courtyard. The Project is being undertaken to address current constraints in available display space (including future provision) and visitor amenity, enabling the Memorial to fulfil its role of telling the story of Australian’s experience in conflicts, peacekeeping and humanitarian operations. The action proposed is consistent with the Project’s Detailed Business Case (DBC) as announced by the Commonwealth Government in November 2018 and funded in the Mid-Year Economic and Fiscal Outlook 2018-19 (Ref.
    [Show full text]
  • Determining the Effectiveness of Vegetation Management Programs Measures and Methodologies - Literature Review
    Determining the Effectiveness of Vegetation Management Programs Measures and Methodologies - Literature Review RIRDC/LWRRDC/FWPRDC Joint Venture Agroforestry Program (supported by the Natural Heritage Trust and the Murray Darling Basin Commission) and Environment Australia RIRDC Publication No 99/130 RIRDC Project No MS967-43 © 2000 Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation. All rights reserved. ISBN 0 642 57936 9 ISSN 1440-6845 Determining the Effectiveness of Vegetation Management Programs – Measures and Methodologies Publication no 99/130 Project no. MS967-43 The views expressed and the conclusions reached in this publication are those of the authors and not necessarily those of persons consulted. RIRDC shall not be responsible in any way whatsoever to any person who relies in whole or in part on the contents of this report. This publication is copyright. However, RIRDC encourages wide dissemination of its research, providing the Corporation is clearly acknowledged. For any other enquiries concerning reproduction, contact the Publications Manager on phone 02 6272 3186. Researcher Contact Details Centre for International Economics CSIRO GPO Box 2203 Division of Wildlife and Ecology Canberra ACT 2601 Gungahlin Homestead Barton highway Phone: 02 6248 6699 CRACE ACT 2911 Fax: 02 6247 7484 GPO Box 284 Email: [email protected] CANBERRA CITY ACT 2601 Phone: 02 6242 1600 Website: http://www.csiro.au/index.asp RIRDC Contact Details Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation Level 1, AMA House 42 Macquarie Street BARTON
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction
    1 Introduction The Parliamentary Zone “The Parliamentary Zone will be given meaning as the Place of the People, accessible to all Australians so that they can more fully understand and appreciate the collective experience and rich diversity of this country.” – National Capital Plan. 1.1 Walter Burley Griffin’s plan for Canberra was designed to reflect the values of an emerging nation1 and includes that which has come to be known as the National Triangle. The southern apex of the triangle, known as the Parliamentary Zone, is described in the National Capital Plan as “the physical manifestation of Australian democratic government and home of the nation's most important cultural and judicial institutions and symbols”.2 The institutions within the Zone represent the Australian people, their values and achievements.3 In general terms, the Parliamentary Zone includes the Parliament House site within Capital Circle and extends to the land lying east of Commonwealth Avenue and west of Kings Avenue to Lake Burley Griffin, and the land south of Lake Burley Griffin lying between the two avenues. 1 National Capital Authority, Consolidated National Capital Plan, February 2002, p 285. 2 National Capital Authority, Consolidated National Capital Plan, February 2002, p 29. 3 John Lauder, Submissions, p 132. 2 1.2 The Parliamentary Zone covers a total area of 1,081,048 square metres, approximately 14 per cent of which is taken up by surface parking and 5.6 per cent of which is taken up by buildings. These buildings include the national institutions which consist of Reconciliation Place, Commonwealth Place, the National Gallery of Australia, the High Court of Australia, the National Science and Technology Centre, Old Parliament House and the National Portrait Gallery, the National Library of Australia and the National Archives of Australia4.
    [Show full text]
  • Public Environmental Report
    Darwin 10 MTPA LNG Facility Public Environmental Report March 2002 Darwin 10 MTPA LNG Facility Public Environmental Report March 2002 Prepared for Phillips Petroleum Company Australia Pty Ltd Level 1, HPPL House 28-42 Ventnor Avenue West Perth WA 6005 Australia by URS Australia Pty Ltd Level 3, Hyatt Centre 20 Terrace Road East Perth WA 6004 Australia 12 March 2002 Reference: 00533-244-562 / R841 / PER Darwin LNG Plant Phillips Petroleum Company Australia Pty Ltd ABN 86 092 288 376 Public Environmental Report PUBLIC COMMENT INVITED Phillips Petroleum Company Australia Pty Ltd, a subsidiary of Phillips Petroleum Company, proposes the construction and operation of an expanded two-train Liquefied Natural Gas facility with a maximum design capacity of 10 million tonnes per annum (MTPA). The facility will be located at Wickham Point on the Middle Arm Peninsula adjacent to Darwin Harbour near Darwin, NT. The proposed project will include gas liquefication, storage and marine loading facilities and a dedicated fleet of ships to transport LNG product. A subsea pipeline supplying natural gas from the Bayu-Undan field to Wickham Point and a similar, but smaller 3 MTPA LNG plant were the subject of a detailed Environmental Impact Assessment process and received approval from Commonwealth and Northern Territory Environment Ministers during 1998. The environmental assessment of the expanded LNG facility is being conducted at the Public Environmental Report (PER) level of the Northern Territory Environmental Assessment Act and the Commonwealth Environmental Protection (Impact of Proposals) Act. The draft PER describes the expanded LNG facility with particular emphasis on its differences from the previously approved LNG facility and addresses the potential environmental impacts and mitigation measures associated with the project.
    [Show full text]
  • Australian War Memorial Annual Report 2006–2007 Australian War Memorial Annual Report 2006–2007
    AUSTRALIAN WAR MEMORIAL ANNUAL REPORT 2006–2007 AUSTRALIAN WAR MEMORIAL ANNUAL REPORT 2006–2007 The Hon. John Howard MP, Prime Minister of Australia, in the Courtyard Gallery on Remembrance Day. Annual report for the year ended 30 June 2007, together with the financial statements and the report of the Auditor-General. Images produced courtesy of the Australian War Memorial, Canberra Cover: Children in the Vietnam environment in the Discovery Zone Child using the radar in the Cold War environment in the Discovery Zone Air show during the Australian War Memorial Open Day Firing demonstration during Australian War Memorial Open Day Children in the Vietnam environment in the Discovery Zone Big Things on Display, part of the Salute to Vietnam Veterans Weekend Back cover: Will Longstaff, Menin Gate at midnight,1927 (AWM ART09807) Stella Bowen, Bomber crew 1944 (AWM ART26265) Australian War Memorial Parade Ground William Dargie, Group of VADs, 1942 (AWM ART22349) Wallace Anderson and Louis McCubbin, Lone Pine, diorama, 1924–27 (AWM ART41017) Copyright © Australian War Memorial 2007 ISSN 1441 4198 This work is copyright. Apart from any use as permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, no part may be reproduced, copied, scanned, stored in a retrieval system, recorded, or transmitted in any form or by any means without the prior written permission of the publisher. Australian War Memorial GPO Box 345 Canberra, ACT 2601 Australia www.awm.gov.au iii AUSTRALIAN WAR MEMORIAL ANNUAL REPORT 2006–2007 iv AUSTRALIAN WAR MEMORIAL ANNUAL REPORT 2006–2007 INTRODUCTION TO THE REPORT The Annual Report of the Australian War Memorial for the year ended 30 June 2007 follows the format for an Annual Report for a Commonwealth Authority in accordance with the Commonwealth Authorities and Companies (CAC) (Report of Operations) Orders 2005 under the CAC Act 1997.
    [Show full text]