DOCSLIB.ORG

Flood Risk Management in Slovenia

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Flood Risk Management in Slovenia Flood Risk Management in Slovenia Luka Stravs, M.Sc. Flood Risk Management in Slovenia introduction, some publicly known data, some observations; EU Floods Directive implementation in Slovenia (PFRA, APSFRs, FHRMs, FRMP (methodology of the FRMP preparation, catalog of measures, CB method…); some good flood risk management practices in Slovenia (eVode/eWater platform, Water Management Atlas, free and public LIDAR data distribution for Slovenia); Flood damage data for Slovenia direct damages after larger flood events in the last 25 years: 1990 cca 580 mio EUR, 1998 cca 180 mio EUR, 2007 cca 200 mio EUR, 2009 cca 25 mio EUR, 2010 cca 190 mio EUR, 2012 cca 310 mio EUR and 2014 cca 255 mio EUR. last 25 years cca 1750 mio EUR (cca 2150 mio EUR); last 10 years cca 980 mio EUR (cca 1200 mio EUR): only direct damages included! quick estimation – 150 mio EUR per year of flood related damages in Slovenia! Flood damages in Slovenia Flood damages in Slovenia Flood damages in Slovenia Flood damages in Slovenia EU Floods Directive Implementation in Republic of Slovenia Premilinary Flood Risk Assessment – done (22.12.2011), published (22.12.2011) and reported to EC (22.03.2012); Areas with Potential Significant Flood Risk –61 APSFRs identified (14.02.2013) and reported to EC (21.03.2013); Flood Hazard and Flood Risk Maps – reported to EC (20.03.2014); Flood Risk Management Plan (work in progress). Preliminary Flood Risk Assessment for Slovenia http://www.mop.gov.si/fileadmin/mop.gov.si/pageuploads/podrocja/voda/predhodna_ocena_popl avne_ogrozenosti.pdf 61 APSFRs in Slovenia (42 APSFRs in the Sava River Basin / 51 APSFRs in the Danube River Basin) PFRA data and APSFRs in Slovenia 61 APSFRs (130000 inhabitants, 90000 working places, ...) approx. 50% of all potential flood damages 600 mio EUR (510 mio EUR for structural measures) = 4-5 years of damages Kresnice APSFR - situation Kresnice APSFR - situation Kresnice APSFR – Flood Hazard – Q10 (publicly accessible flood hazard maps) Kresnice APSFR – Flood Hazard – Q100 (publicly accessible flood hazard maps) Kresnice APSFR – Flood Hazard – Q500 (publicly accessible flood hazard maps) Publicly accessible flood risk maps (example for Ljubljana APSFR – Q500) Flood Risk Management Plan (61 APSFRs) Flood Risk Management Plan (61 APSFRs grouped in 17 river basins) Flood Risk Management Plan – includes 17 ‚mini‘ FRMPs – Savinja Flood Risk Management Plan – flood hazard and flood risk maps - Savinja Flood Risk Management Plan Flood Risk Management Plan Flood Risk Management Plan Flood Risk Management Plan – flood risk reduction measures Flood Risk Management Plan – flood risk reduction measures Flood Risk Management Plan – flood risk reduction measures FRMP – Savinja River Basin – flood risk reduction measures FRMP – Savinja River Basin – flood risk reduction measures (details) FRMP – Savinja River Basin (NWRM) FRMP – Savinja River Basin (struct.) FRMP – Savinja River Basin (monit.) FRMP – Savinja River Basin – projects (ideas, on-going ones, expected results) FRMP – Savinja River Basin – FP projects for each basin (details) FRMP – Savinja River Basin – FP projects for each basin (details) Examples: - DAMWARM (cca 3.5 mio EUR); - CRO – SI CBC bilateral FP project (cca 12 mio EUR); - Gradaščica structural FP measures (cca 40 mio EUR); - Selška Sora structural FP measures (cca 21 mio EUR) - detailed mapping; -… FRMP CBA methodology COSTS - costs of the structural flood protection measures can be calculated (inclusion of annual maintanence and operation costs); COSTS - estimation of the costs of non-structural flood protection measures can be quite a difficult task ; BENEFITS - how to assess the benefits of the FP measures? structural – methodology based on reduction of expected annual damage; non-structural - % of risk reduction approximations; FRMP CBA – methodology for the assessment of benefits of flood protection measures - elements at risk FRMP CBA methodogy – Expected annual damage before the implementation of the measure FRMP CBA methodology – implementing the measure CBA mtdlgy–benefit of the FP measure Additional (re)sources (free & publicly accessible and downloadable) eVode (eWater) web portal/platform; Atlas voda (Water Management Atlas); LIDAR data downloader (free!); eWater portal (eVode) http://evode.arso.gov.si/ eWater portal (eVode) http://evode.arso.gov.si/ eWater portal (eVode) http://evode.arso.gov.si/ eWater portal (eVode) http://evode.arso.gov.si/ eWater portal (eVode) http://evode.arso.gov.si/ Water Management Atlas (Atlas voda) http://gis.arso.gov.si/evode/profile.aspx?id=atlas_voda@Arso Water Management Atlas (Atlas voda) http://gis.arso.gov.si/evode/profile.aspx?id=atlas_voda@Arso Water Management Atlas (Atlas voda) http://gis.arso.gov.si/evode/profile.aspx?id=atlas_voda@Arso Water Management Atlas (Atlas voda) http://gis.arso.gov.si/evode/profile.aspx?id=atlas_voda@Arso Free&public LIDAR data distribution (via http://gis.arso.gov.si/evode/profile.aspx?id=atlas_voda@Arso or http://gis.arso.gov.si/evode/profile.aspx?id=atlas_voda_Lidar@Arso) Free&public LIDAR data distribution (via http://gis.arso.gov.si/evode/profile.aspx?id=atlas_voda@Arso or http://gis.arso.gov.si/evode/profile.aspx?id=atlas_voda_Lidar@Arso) Free&public LIDAR data distribution (via http://gis.arso.gov.si/evode/profile.aspx?id=atlas_voda@Arso or http://gis.arso.gov.si/evode/profile.aspx?id=atlas_voda_Lidar@Arso) Free&public LIDAR data distribution (via http://gis.arso.gov.si/evode/profile.aspx?id=atlas_voda@Arso or http://gis.arso.gov.si/evode/profile.aspx?id=atlas_voda_Lidar@Arso) Some open issues for discussion during the workshop EU 7-year cycle financial pl. 2007-2013, 2014-2020, 2021-2027, 2028-2034 EU RBMP and FRMP 6-year cycle pl. 2010-2015, 2016-2021, 2022-2027, 2028-2033 is EU Floods Directive really just a „daughter“ directive in relation to the EU Water Framework Directive? WFD measures can be in conflict with FD objectives of reducing existing flood risk as well! do we really need two management plans for the same river? (hint: integrated river basin management planning!) Thank you for your attention!.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • From Urban Geodiversity to Geoheritage: the Case of Ljubljana (Slovenia)
    Jure Tičar eT al. QUAESTIONES GEOGRAPHICAE 36(3) • 2017 FROM URBAN GEODIVERSITY TO GEOHERITAGE: THE CASE OF LJUBLJANA (SLOVENIA) Jure Tičar, Blaž Komac, maTiJa Zorn, maTeJa FerK, mauro HrvaTin, roK ciglič Anton Melik Geographical Institute, Research Centre of the Slovenian Academy of Sciences and Arts, Ljubljana, Slovenia Manuscript received: March 31, 2017 Revised version: June 19, 2017 Tičar J., Komac B., Zorn M., FerK M., HrvaTin M., ciglič R., 2017. From urban geodiversity to geoheritage: the case of Ljubljana (Slovenia). Quaestiones Geographicae 36(3), Bogucki Wydawnictwo Naukowe, Poznań, pp. 37–50. 7 figs, 1 table. aBsTracT: The city of Ljubljana lies at the intersection of various geomorphological regions that have strongly influ- enced its spatial organization. Prehistoric settlements were built on marshland, a Roman town was built on the first river terrace of the Ljubljanica River, and in the Middle Ages a town was built in a strategic position between the Lju- bljanica River and Castle Hill. The modern city absorbed all usable space between the nearby hills. This paper reviews some relief features in Ljubljana, their influence on the city’s spatial development, and urban geoheritage. The results indicate new possibilities for urban geoheritage tourism in the Slovenian capital and its surroundings. Key words: geoheritage, geomorphology, urbanization, spatial growth, Ljubljana Corresponding author: Jure Tičar, [email protected] Introduction connecting the diversity of geomorphological and geological elements with their interpretation During the 1990s, geologists and geomorphol- and recreation (Necheş 2016). Consenquently ogists started using the term geodiversity to de- many geoparks dedicated to protect and to pro- scribe the diversity of nonliving nature (Sharples mote the nonliving elements of nature are being 1993, Wiedenbein 1994, Zwolinski 2004).
    [Show full text]
  • World Bank Document
    work in progress for public discussion Public Disclosure Authorized Water Resources Management in South Eastern Public Disclosure Authorized Europe Volume II Country Water Notes and Public Disclosure Authorized Water Fact Sheets Environmentally and Socially Public Disclosure Authorized Sustainable Development Department Europe and Central Asia Region 2003 The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development / The World Bank 1818 H Street, N.W., Washington, DC 20433, USA Manufactured in the United States of America First Printing April 2003 This publication is in two volumes: (a) Volume 1—Water Resources Management in South Eastern Europe: Issues and Directions; and (b) the present Volume 2— Country Water Notes and Water Fact Sheets. The Environmentally and Socially Sustainable Development (ECSSD) Department is distributing this report to disseminate findings of work-in-progress and to encourage debate, feedback and exchange of ideas on important issues in the South Eastern Europe region. The report carries the names of the authors and should be used and cited accordingly. The findings, interpretations and conclusions are the authors’ own and should not be attributed to the World Bank, its Board of Directors, its management, or any member countries. For submission of comments and suggestions, and additional information, including copies of this report, please contact Ms. Rita Cestti at: 1818 H Street N.W. Washington, DC 20433, USA Email: [email protected] Tel: (1-202) 473-3473 Fax: (1-202) 614-0698 Printed on Recycled Paper Contents
    [Show full text]
  • Case Study Slovenia
    TOWN Small and medium sized towns in their functional territorial context Applied Research 2013/1/23 Case Study Report | Slovenia Version 05/09/2013 ESPON 2013 1 This report presents the interim results of an Applied Research Project conducted within the framework of the ESPON 2013 Programme, partly financed by the European Regional Development Fund. The partnership behind the ESPON Programme consists of the EU Commission and the Member States of the EU27, plus Iceland, Liechtenstein, Norway and Switzerland. Each partner is represented in the ESPON Monitoring Committee. This report does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the members of the Monitoring Committee. Information on the ESPON Programme and projects can be found on www.espon.eu The web site provides the possibility to download and examine the most recent documents produced by finalised and ongoing ESPON projects. This basic report exists only in an electronic version. © ESPON & University of Leuven, 2013. Printing, reproduction or quotation is authorised provided the source is acknowledged and a copy is forwarded to the ESPON Coordination Unit in Luxembourg. List of authors Nataša Pichler-Milanović, University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Civil and Geodetic Engineering, Ljubljana, Slovenia Samo Drobne, University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Civil and Geodetic Engineering, Ljubljana, Slovenia Miha Konjar, University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Civil and Geodetic Engineering, Ljubljana, Slovenia © Institute UL-FGG d.o.o, Jamova 2, SI-1001 Ljubljana, Slovenia ESPON 2013 i Table of contents
    [Show full text]
  • Preliminary Flood Risk Assessment in the Sava River Basin
    PRELIMINARY FLOOD RISK ASSESSMENT IN THE SAVA RIVER BASIN July, 2014 Date Document Revision History Document Author/Reviser 23 September 2013 Initial draft – sent to PEG FP for comments Secretariat/ PEG FP 17 December 2013 Draft 2 – sent to PEG FP for comments Secretariat/ V. Tusić, M. Babić Mladenović 30 January 2014 Draft 2.1 – reviewed at 23rd PEG FP meeting Secretariat/ PEG FP 20 March 2014 Draft 3 – sent to PEG FP for comments Secretariat/ V. Tusić, A. Bezdrob 14 April 2014 Draft 3.1 – sent as doc. for 24th PEG FP meeting Secretariat/ PEG FP 02 June 2014 Draft 4 – sent to PEG FP for comments Secretariat/ V. Tusić 10 June 2014 Draft 4.1 – sent to PEG FP for approval Secretariat/ PEG FP (no comments) 18 June 2014 Draft 5 – sent to ISRBC Secretariat/ ISRBC 01 July 2014 ISRBC accepted and approved publishing on web ISRBC International Sava River Basin Commission Kneza Branimira 29 10 000 Zagreb, Croatia T: + 385 1 488 69 60 F: + 385 1 488 69 86 [email protected] www.savacommission.org TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................................... 1 2 GENERAL INFORMATION ON THE SAVA RIVER BASIN .................................................................. 3 3 OVERALL APPROACH AND METHODOLOGY ..................................................................................... 4 3.1 SLOVENIA ...........................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Analysis of Flood Fatalities–Slovenian Illustration
    water Article Analysis of Flood Fatalities–Slovenian Illustration Maruša Špitalar 1,2,*, Mitja Brilly 1, Drago Kos 2 and Aleš Žiberna 2 1 Faculty of Civil and Geodetic Engineering, University of Ljubljana, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia; [email protected] 2 Faculty of Social Science, University of Ljubljana, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia; [email protected] (D.K.); [email protected] (A.Ž.) * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +386-4164-1735 Received: 31 October 2019; Accepted: 15 December 2019; Published: 23 December 2019 Abstract: Floods not only induce vast economic damages but also pose a great danger to human life. In Slovenia, floods rank number one on the scale of damage magnitude. Different factors external to the hazard of flooding influence the gravity and extent of the impacts. A comprehensive collection and analysis of the information related to the understanding of causative factors of human impacts can substantially contribute to the mitigation and the minimisation of fatalities and injuries. In this work, historical analysis was performed for flood fatalities in the years between 1926 and 2014, with 10 flood events that induced 74 casualties considered. A detailed collection and review on human impacts was made. Victims in cars have seemed to increase in recent years and rural areas tend to be more vulnerable and susceptible to having victims of flooding. With regards to gender, the majority of victims are male. The focus was on demographic aspects (age and gender) of fatalities and analysis of the circumstances of loss of life. Based on a description of the activities of victims during flood events and repetitive patterns, groups were made based on the type of flood fatality.
    [Show full text]
  • Surface Water Bodies in the Sava River Basin
    Sava River Basin Management Plan Background paper No.1 Surface water bodies in the Sava River Basin March 2013 This document has been produced with the financial assistance of the European Union. The contents of this document are the sole responsibility of the beneficiaries and can under no circumstances be regarded as reflecting the position of the European Union. Sava River Basin Management Plan Table of Contents 1. Introduction ......................................................................................................... 5 2. Description of the Sava River and its main tributaries ......................... 5 2.1 Sectioning of the River Sava.................................................................................................. 8 3 Delineation of surface water bodies ............................................................ 10 4 Surface water monitoring network in the Sava River Basin ............... 18 4.1 Introduction .................................................................................................................................... 18 4.2 Assessment of the existing national and Danube basin wide monitoring networks .................................................................................................................................... 19 4.3 Danube Transnational Monitoring Network ...................................................................... 21 4.4 Comparability of monitoring results ....................................................................... 23 4.5 Monitoring
    [Show full text]
  • Proceedings from the Transboundary Training Workshop on Governance
    Transboundary Training Workshop Governance and Technology for Flood Risk Reduction: Linking Early Warning to Emergency Management in the Sava River Basin Proceedings Zagreb, Croatia 5-7 December 2017 May 2019 Prepared by: ISRBC Secretariat in cooperation with UNESCO Regional Bureau for Science and Culture in Europe (Science Unit) within the framework of the I-REACT project (http://www.i-react.eu/) © International Sava River Basin Commission (ISRBC), 2019 The right of publication in print, electronic and any other form and in any language is reserved by ISRBC. Short extracts from ISRBC publications may be reproduced without authorisation, provided that the complete source is clearly indicated. Editorial correspondence and requests to publish, reproduce or translate this publication in part or in whole should be addressed to: International Sava River Basin Commission Kneza Branimira 29, Zagreb Croatia Tel: +385 1 488 69 60 Fax: +385 1 488 69 86 E-mail: [email protected] Note The designations employed and the presentation of material throughout this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of UNESCO and ISRBC concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The mention of specific companies or products does not imply that they are endorsed or recommended by UNESCO and ISRBC in preference to others of a similar nature, which are not mentioned or advertised. The authors are responsible for the choice and the presentation of the facts contained in this publication and for the opinions expressed therein, which are not necessarily those of UNESCO and ISRBC and do not commit them.
    [Show full text]
  • 2010 Floods in the Danube River Basin Brief Overview of Key Events and Lessons Learned
    / / / / / а н ї а р к У / // / va do ol / M /// ия р га л ъ Б / / / / a i n â m o R / / / / a r o G a n r C / / / / а ј и б р С / / / / a n i v o g e c r e H i a n s 2010 o B / // / a Floods in the k s at rv H Danube River Basin //// ija ven /// Slo Brief overview of key events //// Slovensko //// Magyarország / á republika // C ˇ esk and lessons learned ch // rrei ste // Ö // nd la h c ts u e D / / / / Foreword According to climatic data, the 2009 – 2010 hydrological year (measured from November to November) produced the largest amount of precipitation ever observed in many parts of the Danube region. The layer of snow and rain along the central Danube exceeded the multiannual average by 1.5 to 2.0 times, a maximum never observed since systematic instrumental weather observations have been available. Contrary to the massive single flood events on the Danube as occurred in 2002 or 2006 due to high precipitation volume in a short time, in 2010 the scattered character of the rainfall throughout the whole year and throughout the most of the Danube River Basin led to a high number of damaging flood events at the local level. Except of German and Austrian part of the Danube River Basin, where only minor floods occurred, all other countries suffered from considerable flooding causing casualties and massive damages. This report gives a brief overview of the flood events in the basin in 2010, reviews the responses of the countries and the damages registered and brings forward the lessons learned.
    [Show full text]
  • From Urban Geodiversity to Geoheritage: the Case of Ljubljana (Slovenia)
    Jure Tičar eT al. QUAESTIONES GEOGRAPHICAE 36(3) • 2017 FROM URBAN GEODIVERSITY TO GEOHERITAGE: THE CASE OF LJUBLJANA (SLOVENIA) Jure Tičar, Blaž Komac, maTiJa Zorn, maTeJa FerK, mauro HrvaTin, roK ciglič Anton Melik Geographical Institute, Research Centre of the Slovenian Academy of Sciences and Arts, Ljubljana, Slovenia Manuscript received: March 31, 2017 Revised version: June 19, 2017 Tičar J., Komac B., Zorn M., FerK M., HrvaTin M., ciglič R., 2017. From urban geodiversity to geoheritage: the case of Ljubljana (Slovenia). Quaestiones Geographicae 36(3), Bogucki Wydawnictwo Naukowe, Poznań, pp. 37–50. 7 figs, 1 table. aBsTracT: The city of Ljubljana lies at the intersection of various geomorphological regions that have strongly influ- enced its spatial organization. Prehistoric settlements were built on marshland, a Roman town was built on the first river terrace of the Ljubljanica River, and in the Middle Ages a town was built in a strategic position between the Lju- bljanica River and Castle Hill. The modern city absorbed all usable space between the nearby hills. This paper reviews some relief features in Ljubljana, their influence on the city’s spatial development, and urban geoheritage. The results indicate new possibilities for urban geoheritage tourism in the Slovenian capital and its surroundings. Key words: geoheritage, geomorphology, urbanization, spatial growth, Ljubljana Corresponding author: Jure Tičar, [email protected] Introduction connecting the diversity of geomorphological and geological elements with their interpretation During the 1990s, geologists and geomorphol- and recreation (Necheş 2016). Consenquently ogists started using the term geodiversity to de- many geoparks dedicated to protect and to pro- scribe the diversity of nonliving nature (Sharples mote the nonliving elements of nature are being 1993, Wiedenbein 1994, Zwolinski 2004).
    [Show full text]
  • Water & Climate Adaptation Plan for the Sava River Basin
    Trust Fund for Environmentally & Socially Sustainable Development Public Disclosure Authorized Water & Climate Adaptation Plan for the Sava River Basin Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized FINAL REPORT Public Disclosure Authorized August 2015 © 2015 The World Bank 1818 H Street NW Washington DC 20433 Telephone: 202-473-1000 Internet: www.worldbank.org Water & Climate Adaptation Plan for the Sava River Basin FINAL REPORT August 2015 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This work was made possible by the financial contribution of the World Bank’s Water Partnership Program (WPP), a multi-donor trust fund that promotes water security for inclusive green growth (water.worldbank.org/water/wpp), and the Trust Fund for Environmentally & Socially Sustainable Development (TFESSD). DISCLAIMER This work is a product of the World Bank with external contributions. The findings, interpretations, and conclusions expressed in this work do not necessarily reflect the views of the World Bank, its Board of Executive Directors, or the governments they represent. The World Bank does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this work. The boundaries, colors, denominations, and other information shown on any map in this work do not imply any judgment on the part of The World Bank concerning the legal status of any territory or the endorsement or acceptance of such boundaries. RIGHTS AND PERMISSIONS The material in this work is subject to copyright. Because the World Bank encourages the dissemination of its knowledge, this work may be reproduced, in whole or in part, for noncommercial purposes as long as full attribution is given. Any queries on rights and licenses, including subsidiary rights, should be addressed to the Office of the Publisher, the World Bank, 1818 H Street NW, Washington, DC 20433, USA; fax: 202-522-2422; e-mail: [email protected].
    [Show full text]
  • Workshop on Flood Risk Management Measures & Links to EU
    Proceedings of the Workshop on Flood Risk Management Measures & Links to EU WFD Zagreb, Croatia 11 – 12 November 2015 © International Sava River Basin Commission (ISRBC), 2016 The right of publication in print, electronic and any other form and in any language is reserved by ISRBC. Short extracts from ISRBC publications may be reproduced without authorization, provided that the complete source is clearly indicated. Editorial correspondence and requests to publish, reproduce or translate this publication in part or in whole should be addressed to: International Sava River Basin Commission Kneza Branimira 29, Zagreb Croatia Tel: +385 1 488 69 60 Fax: +385 1 488 69 86 E-mail: [email protected] NOTE The designations employed and the presentation of material throughout this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of ISRBC concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The mention of specific companies or products does not imply that they are endorsed or recommended by ISRBC in preference to others of a similar nature which are not mentioned or advertised. The author is responsible for the choice and the presentation of the facts contained in this book and for the opinions expressed therein, which are not necessarily those of ISRBC and do not commit ISRBC. This publication has been produced with the assistance of UNESCO Venice Office. The contents of this publication are the sole responsibility of the signatory institutions and can in no way be taken to reflect the views of UNESCO Venice Office.
    [Show full text]
  • Water Resources in Europe and Central Asia
    WATER RESOURCES IN EUROPE AND CENTRAL ASIA VOLUME II COUNTRY WATER NOTES AND SELECTED TRANSBOUNDARY BASINS 2003 The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development / The World Bank 1818 H Street, N.W., Washington, DC 20433, USA Manufactured in the United States of America Second Printing August 2003 This publication is in two volumes: (a) Volume I—Water Resources in Europe and Central Asia: Issues and Strategic Directions; and (b) the present Volume II—Water Resources in Europe and Central Asia: Country Water Notes and Selected Transboundary Basins. The Environmentally and Socially Sustainable Development (ECSSD) Department is distributing this report to disseminate findings of work-in-progress and to encourage debate, feedback and exchange of ideas on important issues in the Europe and Central Asia region. The report carries the names of the authors and should be used and cited accordingly. The findings, interpretations and conclusions are the authors’ own and should not be attributed to the World Bank, its Board of Directors, its management, or any member countries. For submission of comments and suggestions, and additional information, including copies of this report, please contact Ms. Rita Cestti at: 1818 H Street N.W. Washington, DC 20433, USA Email: [email protected] Tel: (1-202) 473-3473 Fax: (1-202) 614-0698 Printed on Recycled Paper TABLE OF CONTENTS Weights and Measures...................................................................................................................ii Acronyms and Abbreviations ......................................................................................................iii
    [Show full text]